Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1992 May;30(5):1134–1139. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1134-1139.1992

Evaluation of four serological tests for bovine paratuberculosis.

D C Sockett 1, T A Conrad 1, C B Thomas 1, M T Collins 1
PMCID: PMC265237  PMID: 1583110

Abstract

The standard complement fixation (CF) test, a commercial agarose gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test (ImmuCell Corporation, Portland, Maine), and two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs; Allied Laboratories, Glenwood Springs, Colo. [Allied ELISA], and the CSL, Limited, [Parkville, Victoria, Australia] enzyme immunoassay [CSL ELISA]) were evaluated by using sera from the Repository for Paratuberculosis Specimens. The case definition of subclinical bovine paratuberculosis was isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from fecal samples or internal organs of dairy cattle without diarrhea or weight loss. Animals designated as free of the disease originated exclusively from certified paratuberculosis-free herds in Wisconsin. None of the cattle evaluated had been vaccinated for paratuberculosis. Among 177 M. paratuberculosis-infected cattle, the CF test, the AGID test, the Allied ELISA, and the CSL ELISA had test sensitivities of 38.4, 26.6, 58.8, and 43.4%, respectively, and specificities of 99.0, 100.0, 95.4, and 99.0%, respectively. Only 108 of the infected cattle were confirmed by culture or by a commercial DNA probe (IDEXX Corporation, Portland, Maine) to be shedding the organism in fecal samples at the time of serological testing. Among the 108 M. paratuberculosis fecal shedders, the CF test, the AGID test, the Allied ELISA, and the CSL ELISA were positive for 54.6, 40.7, 65.7, and 56.5% of the cows, respectively; and among the 69 cows that were nonshedders, the tests were positive for 14.5, 4.3, 47.8, and 24.6% of the cows, respectively. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the rate of positive test results for all four tests between these two groups of animals. The CF test performed well when it was compared with the other serological tests if a titer of >/- 1.8 was classified as a positive test result.

Full text

PDF
1134

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auer L. A., Schleehauf S. M. Antibodies to mycobacteria in cattle not infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Microbiol. 1988 Sep;18(1):51–61. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(88)90115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiodini R. J., Van Kruiningen H. J., Merkal R. S. Ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): the current status and future prospects. Cornell Vet. 1984 Jul;74(3):218–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colgrove G. S., Thoen C. O., Blackburn B. O., Murphy C. D. Paratuberculosis in cattle: a comparison of three serologic tests with results of fecal culture. Vet Microbiol. 1989 Feb;19(2):183–187. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins M. T., Kenefick K. B., Sockett D. C., Lambrecht R. S., McDonald J., Jorgensen J. B. Enhanced radiometric detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by using filter-concentrated bovine fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2514–2519. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2514-2519.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins M. T., Morgan I. R. Economic decision analysis model of a paratuberculosis test and cull program. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Dec 15;199(12):1724–1729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins M. T., Sockett D. C., Ridge S., Cox J. C. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):272–276. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.272-276.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cox J. C., Drane D. P., Jones S. L., Ridge S., Milner A. R. Development and evaluation of a rapid absorbed enzyme immunoassay test for the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. Aust Vet J. 1991 May;68(5):157–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1991.tb03167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim Y. G., Bech-Nielsen S., Gordon J. C., Slemons R. D., Spangler E. Comparison of two methods for isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Jul;50(7):1110–1113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LARSEN A. B., VARDAMAN T. H., MERKAL R. S. AN EXTENDED STUDY OF A HERD OF CATTLE NATURALLY INFECTED WITH JOHNE'S DISEASE. II. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COMPLEMENT-FIXATION TEST. Am J Vet Res. 1963 Sep;24:948–950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Merkal R. S., Larsen A. B., Kopecky K. E. Comparison of examination and test methods for early detection of paratuberculous cattle. Am J Vet Res. 1968 Aug;29(8):1533–1538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Merkal R. S., Larsen A. B., Velicer L. F., Thurston J. R. Serologic and allergenic effects of 3 Mycobacterium paratuberculosis antigens. Am J Vet Res. 1965 Nov;26(115):1267–1270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Milner A. R., Lepper A. W., Symonds W. N., Gruner E. Analysis by ELISA and Western blotting of antibody reactivities in cattle infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after absorption of serum with M phlei. Res Vet Sci. 1987 Mar;42(2):140–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Milner A. R., Mack W. N., Coates K. J., Hill J., Gill I., Sheldrick P. The sensitivity and specificity of a modified ELISA for the diagnosis of Johne's disease from a field trial in cattle. Vet Microbiol. 1990 Nov;25(2-3):193–198. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ransohoff D. F., Feinstein A. R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rice C. E., Konst H., Smith A. N. Studies Of Johne's Disease In Canada. III. Diagnostic Complement-Fixation Tests. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1958 Jul;22(7):249–254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ridge S. E., Morgan I. R., Sockett D. C., Collins M. T., Condron R. J., Skilbeck N. W., Webber J. J. Comparison of the Johne's absorbed EIA and the complement-fixation test for the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. Aust Vet J. 1991 Aug;68(8):253–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1991.tb03230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Riemann H. P., Abbas B. Diagnosis and control of bovine paratuberculosis (Johne's disease). Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 1983;27:481–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Seitz S. E., Heider L. E., Heuston W. D., Bech-Nielsen S., Rings D. M., Spangler L. Bovine fetal infection with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989 May 15;194(10):1423–1426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sherman D. M., Bray B., Gay J. M., Bates F. Evaluation of the agar gel immunodiffusion test for diagnosis of subclinical paratuberculosis in cattle. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Apr;50(4):525–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sherman D. M., Gay J. M., Bouley D. S., Nelson G. H. Comparison of the complement-fixation and agar gel immunodiffusion tests for diagnosis of subclinical bovine paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res. 1990 Mar;51(3):461–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sherman D. M., Markham R. J., Bates F. Agar gel immunodiffusion test for diagnosis of clinical paratuberculosis in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Jul 15;185(2):179–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spangler L., Bech-Nielsen S., Heider L. E. A prospective evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and agar gel immunodiffusion test (AGID) relative to fecal culture in the diagnosis of clinical and subclinical paratuberculosis in cattle in central Ohio. Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1988;84:243–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thoen C. O., Muscoplat C. C. Recent developments in diagnosis of paratuberculosis (Johne's disease). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979 Apr 15;174(8):838–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsai S. J., Hutchinson L. J., Zarkower A. Comparison of dot immunobinding assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunodiffusion for serodiagnosis of paratuberculosis. Can J Vet Res. 1989 Oct;53(4):405–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tyler J. W., Cullor J. S. Titers, tests, and truisms: rational interpretation of diagnostic serologic testing. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989 Jun 1;194(11):1550–1558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. VARDAMAN T. H., LARSEN A. B. Bovine tuberculosis--studies of complement-fixation antigens. Am J Vet Res. 1961 Mar;22:204–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vary P. H., Andersen P. R., Green E., Hermon-Taylor J., McFadden J. J. Use of highly specific DNA probes and the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 May;28(5):933–937. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.5.933-937.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Whipple D. L., Callihan D. R., Jarnagin J. L. Cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal specimens and a suggested standardized procedure. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1991 Oct;3(4):368–373. doi: 10.1177/104063879100300424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilesmith J. W. Johne's disease: a retrospective study of vaccinated herds in Great Britain. Br Vet J. 1982 Jul-Aug;138(4):321–331. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)31037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Woodruff T. S., Shulaw W. P., Bech-Nielsen S., Hoffsis G. F., Spangler E., Heider L. E. Serodiagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis by use of a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Vet Res. 1991 Feb;52(2):217–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yokomizo Y., Merkal R. S., Lyle P. A. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of bovine immunoglobulin G1 antibody to a protoplasmic antigen of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res. 1983 Nov;44(11):2205–2207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yokomizo Y., Yugi H., Merkal R. S. A method for avoiding false-positive reactions in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1985 Feb;47(1):111–119. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.47.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. de Lisle G. W., Samagh B. S., Duncan J. R. Bovine paratuberculosis II. A comparison of fecal culture and the antibody response. Can J Comp Med. 1980 Apr;44(2):183–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES