Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Oncology
. 2008 Aug 11;26(29):4731–4738. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8941

Incidence of Suicide in Persons With Cancer

Stephanie Misono 1, Noel S Weiss 1, Jesse R Fann 1, Mary Redman 1, Bevan Yueh 1
PMCID: PMC2653137  PMID: 18695257

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to characterize suicide rates among patients with cancer in the United States and identify patient and disease characteristics associated with higher suicide rates. Prior studies, mostly in Europe, have suggested that patients with cancer may be at increased risk for suicide, but large cohort studies comparing patients with cancer with the general population have not been performed in the United States.

Methods

Patients in the study were residents of geographic areas served by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program who were diagnosed with cancer from 1973 to 2002. Comparisons with the general US population were based on mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. This was a retrospective cohort study of suicide in persons with cancer.

Results

Among 3,594,750 SEER registry patients observed for 18,604,308 person-years, 5,838 suicides were identified, for an age-, sex-, and race-adjusted rate of 31.4/100,000 person-years. In contrast, the suicide rate in the general US population was 16.7/100,000 person-years. Higher suicide rates were associated with male sex, white race, and older age at diagnosis. The highest suicide risks were observed in patients with cancers of the lung and bronchus (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] = 5.74; 95% CI, 5.30 to 6.22), stomach (SMR = 4.68; 95% CI, 3.81 to 5.70), oral cavity and pharynx (SMR = 3.66; 95% CI, 3.16 to 4.22), and larynx (SMR = 2.83; 95% CI, 2.31 to 3.44). SMRs were highest in the first 5 years after diagnosis with cancer.

Conclusion

Patients with cancer in the United States have nearly twice the incidence of suicide of the general population, and suicide rates vary among patients with cancers of different anatomic sites. Further examination of the psychological experience of patients with cancer, particularly that of patients with certain types of cancer, is warranted.

INTRODUCTION

Improved survival after cancer treatment has heightened the need for better insight into issues of cancer survivorship and quality of life.1 Ten years ago, the National Cancer Institute created the Office of Cancer Survivorship to focus on the needs of cancer survivors.2 Numerous institutions, including the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in conjunction with the Lance Armstrong Foundation3 and the Institute of Medicine,1,4 have funded initiatives to decrease the substantial psychosocial distress experienced by many cancer survivors.

Several studies have identified increased suicide rates among patients with cancer.5-13 Three Scandinavian studies have been large enough to compare suicide rates by anatomic cancer site, with inconsistent results among the studies. Particularly high rates were seen in patients with respiratory and breast cancers in Denmark14; respiratory and oropharyngeal cancers in Norway15; and esophageal, pancreatic, and respiratory cancers in Sweden.11

With the exception of one study that focused exclusively on women with breast cancer,16 anatomic site-specific suicide rates have not been examined in a large sample of patients with cancer in the United States. The aims of our study were to characterize suicide rates among persons with cancer in the United States relative to suicide rates in the general population and to identify patient and disease characteristics, such as anatomic site of cancer, that are associated with particularly high suicide rates.

METHODS

This study was approved by the University of Washington institutional review board (Certificate of Exemption No. 05-8654-X/A) and by the Veterans’ Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System Research Committee (Research and Development Information System approval No. 0030).

Data Sources

Patients with cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The SEER program is a network of population-based incident tumor registries from geographically distinct regions in the United States. The SEER registries contain data from more than 2,800,000 patients and cover approximately 26% of the US population.17 The Public Use version of data collected from the SEER13 registries from 1973 to 2002 was used for this study.18 Comparisons with the general US population were based on mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics spanning 1969 to 2002 and were accessed through the SEER program.19

Study Population and Inclusion Criteria

For analyses pertaining to all forms of cancer combined, all patients with a cancer diagnosis were included, except those for whom information was obtained solely from death certificate or autopsy and therefore had no survival time data (comprising 1.4% of the total patients in the registries). For organ site–specific analysis, patients with multiple primary tumors were excluded because suicides in these patients would not be ascribable to a single anatomic site of cancer.

Data are presented only for persons with those forms of cancer in whom 100,000 person-years or more of survival time accrued in the data obtained from the SEER registries. Thus results are not presented for persons with eye and orbital tumors, skeletal tumors, soft tissue tumors, esophageal tumors, pancreatic tumors, liver and biliary tumors, multiple myelomas, mesotheliomas, Kaposi's sarcomas, male breast cancers, and tumors designated as “other” in the SEER registries. The leukemias were analyzed as an aggregate group because no single type of leukemia accumulated sufficient person-years of survival to be analyzed individually.

Study Variables

Available data in the SEER files included sex, age at diagnosis, race, marital status, and year of diagnosis. Data for selected cancer variables such as anatomic site of disease, extent of disease (local, regional, and distant disease), date of last follow-up, and vital status at last follow-up were also available. Data on concomitant illnesses, such as comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions (including depression and substance abuse) were not available.

Patients were considered to have committed suicide if the cause of death variable was coded as “Suicide and Self-inflicted Injury (50220).” Patients with other cause of death values, including “Accidents and Adverse Effects (50210),” “Homicide and Legal Intervention (50230),” and “Other Cause of Death (50300),” were not classified as deaths due to suicide.

Because survival duration after cancer diagnosis was measured in months, the smallest nonzero value of survival duration was 1 month. Patients included in the analyses who did not survive a full month after diagnosis were therefore coded in the SEER data set as having a survival time of zero. For our analyses, these patients were assigned a survival time of one-half month according to standard epidemiologic convention.20

Statistical Analyses

Contingency tables of suicide rates (number of suicides divided by person-years of survival) were created to facilitate a comparison between the cancer population and the general population, as well as to compare rates by different anatomic sites. Analyses addressing the relation of suicide to demographic characteristics were adjusted to the distribution of the age at diagnosis in persons with cancer in the SEER registries. Suicide rates were standardized to the sex, race, and age (at diagnosis) distribution of the persons with cancer in the SEER registries. Five-year age categories were used for standardization. Staging for prostate tumors that were coded as locoregional in the SEER registries was analyzed as part of the localized group. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and 95% CIs were calculated as previously described.20-22 Analysis for relative suicide risk over time since diagnosis was adjusted for the sex and age distribution of persons with a single primary tumor in the SEER registries. Statistical analyses were performed with SEER*Stat 6.2.3 (Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) and STATA 9.1 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

A total of 5,838 suicides were identified among 3,594,750 persons with cancer observed for 18,604,308 person-years, giving an age-, sex-, and race-adjusted suicide rate of 31.4/100,000 person-years. The corresponding suicide rate in the general US population was 16.7/100,000 person-years. This gave an SMR of 1.88 (95% CI, 1.83 to 1.93). The range of survival time was 0 to 29.92 years, with mean survival time 5.10 years, which was calculated for all persons in the SEER registries regardless of cause of death.

Characteristics Associated With Higher Suicide Rates

Higher suicide rates among patients with cancer were associated with male sex, white race, and being unmarried. Suicide rates were also higher among patients with advanced disease at diagnosis, but not among patients with multiple primary tumors. For the population as a whole, suicide rates remained stable over the 30 years covered in the SEER data (Table 1). Higher suicide rates were noted with increasing age at diagnosis among men (Table 2).

Table 1.

Incidence of Suicide Among Patients With Cancer by Demographic and Tumor Characteristics

Characteristic Patients With Cancer in SEER
Suicides
Suicides per 100,000 Person-Years* SMR* 95% CI
No. % No. %
Sex
    Male 1,728,990 48.1 4,636 79.4 59.7 2.09 2.03 to 2.15
    Female 1,865,760 51.9 1,202 20.6 10.7 1.48 1.40 to 1.57
Race
    White 3,040,111 84.6 5,414 92.7 33.3 1.88 1.83 to 1.93
    Black 311,960 8.7 174 3.0 13.5 1.72 1.48 to 2.00
    Other 242,679 6.8 250 4.3 23.2 2.23 1.97 to 2.53
Marital status
    Unmarried 1,319,454 36.7 2,129 36.5 37.1 2.18 2.09 to 2.28
    Married 1,966,977 54.7 3,300 56.5 31.5 1.84 1.78 to 1.90
    Unknown 308,319 8.6 409 7.0 23.1 1.22 1.10 to 1.34
Stage at presentation
    In situ 307,766 8.6 364 6.2 16.1 0.80 0.72 to 0.89
    Localized 1,446,700 40.2 2,595 44.5 25.1 1.56 1.50 to 1.62
    Regional 733,294 20.4 1,216 20.8 36.1 2.21 2.08 to 2.33
    Distant 704,695 19.6 892 15.3 65.3 4.08 3.81 to 4.35
    Unstaged/unknown 403,295 11.2 771 13.2 59.4 3.59 3.34 to 3.85
No. of primary tumors
    Single 2,815,657 78.3 4,572 78.3 33.5 1.94 1.91 to 2.02
    Multiple 778,736 21.7 1,265 21.7 25.2 1.63 1.54 to 1.72
Year of diagnosis
    1973-1982 789,249 22.0 1,885 32.3 32.7 1.83 1.75 to 1.92
    1983-1992 1,147,389 31.9 2,407 41.2 31.9 1.94 1.87 to 2.02
    1993-2002 1,658,112 46.1 1,546 25.5 29.3 1.83 1.74 to 1.93
All patients with cancer 3,594,750 5,838 31.4 1.88 1.83 to 1.93

Abbreviations: SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; SMR, standardized mortality ratio.

*

Adjusted to the age distribution in the population served by the SEER program.

For the categories of sex and race, SMR reference population was the specific category in the US subpopulation (eg, the SMR for males is the observed number of suicides in men with cancer divided by the expected number of suicides based on the rate in men in the general population). For marital status, stage at presentation, number of primary tumors, and year of diagnosis, SMR reference population is the entire general US population from 1969 through 2002.

A total of 357 persons had an unknown number of primary tumors. There was one suicide in this group.

Table 2.

Suicide Rate in Persons With Cancer by Age at Diagnosis

Age at Diagnosis (years)* Suicide Rate in United States General Population Suicide Rate in SEER Cancer Population Survival Time (person-years)§ No. of Suicides§ SMR 95% CI Suicide Rate Among Male Patients in SEER Cancer Population Suicide Rate Among Female Patients in SEER Cancer Population
15-19 8.7 15.5 148,370 23 1.78 1.13 to 2.66 28.2 8.4
20-24 14.7 15.8 429,339 68 1.08 0.84 to 1.37 29.9 12.1
25-29 15.0 14.8 754,665 112 0.99 0.81 to 1.19 33.0 10.9
30-34 14.7 16.5 847,484 140 1.12 0.95 to 1.33 47.8 8.8
35-39 15.1 18.6 888,357 165 1.23 1.05 to 1.43 54.7 8.4
40-44 15.6 18.3 1,042,682 191 1.17 1.01 to 1.35 45.0 10.2
45-49 16.2 20.2 1,283,883 259 1.25 1.10 to 1.41 45.6 11.1
50-54 16.3 22.2 1,573,521 349 1.36 1.22 to 1.51 44.6 11.2
55-59 16.7 27.7 1,893,017 525 1.66 1.52 to 1.81 51.4 11.9
60-64 15.9 32.5 2,223,345 723 2.05 1.90 to 2.20 57.4 11.1
65-69 16.4 39.7 2,394,511 950 2.42 2.27 to 2.58 67.0 11.6
70-74 18.1 44.9 2,128,697 956 2.48 2.33 to 2.64 76.2 10.1
75-79 20.4 46.6 1,527,301 711 2.28 2.12 to 2.46 80.7 11.2
80-84 22.0 52.3 827,459 433 2.38 2.16 to 2.61 100.3 9.8
85+ 20.1 50.4 438,872 221 2.51 2.19 to 2.86 108.4 10.0

Abbreviations: SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; SMR, standardized mortality ratio.

*

Analysis was limited to age groups for which at least 100,000 person years were accrued.

Per 100,000 person-years.

Reference population: general US population, 1969 to 2002.

§

Among persons with cancer in the populations served by the SEER program.

Anatomic Sites of Tumor Associated With Higher Suicide Rates

Among 2,815,657 patients with a single primary tumor, who accumulated 14,094,889 person-years, 4,572 suicides occurred. Though suicide rates among patients with most types of cancer were higher than those of the general US population, rates were highest in patients with cancers of the lung and bronchus (81.7/100,000 person-years; SMR = 5.74; 95% CI, 5.30 to 6.22), followed by stomach cancers (71.7/100,000 person-years; SMR = 4.68; 95% CI, 3.81 to 5.70), cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx (53.1/100,000 person-years; SMR = 3.66; 95% CI, 3.16 to 4.22), and cancers of the larynx (46.8/100,000 person-years; SMR = 2.83; 95% CI, 2.31 to 3.44; Table 3). Cancers of the lung and bronchus, stomach, and oral cavity and pharynx remained associated with the highest suicide rates in both men and women (Table 3).

Table 3.

Suicide Rates by Anatomic Site of Cancer

Site* No. of Suicides No. of Patients Survival Time (person-years) Overall (male and female)
Male Patients
Female Patients
Suicide Rate SMR§ 95% CI§ Suicide Rate† SMR§ 95% CI§ Suicide Rate SMR§ 95% CI§
Lung and bronchus 610 362,163 541,310 81.7 5.74 5.30 to 6.22 171.4 6.04 5.54 to 6.57 24.8 4.18 3.27 to 5.27
Stomach 100 58,954 113,485 71.7 4.68 3.81 to 5.70 147.1 4.85 3.89 to 5.98 23.9 3.74 1.94 to 6.48
Oral cavity and pharynx 191 51,807 242,481 53.1 3.66 3.16 to 4.22 103.1 3.71 3.18 to 4.31 21.4 3.23 1.95 to 5.03
Larynx 100 24,524 147,142 46.8 2.83 2.31 to 3.44 88.4 2.83 2.29 to 3.46 20.3 2.84 1.04 to 6.06
Hodgkin's lymphoma 50 20,497 165,809 40.6 2.07 1.54 to 2.72 97.2 2.35 1.73 to 3.13 4.6 0.71 0.14 to 1.99
Kidney 90 52,699 237,446 39.7 2.05 1.65 to 2.52 68.7 2.06 1.63 to 2.58 21.2 2.00 1.07 to 3.39
Thyroid 39 38,446 330,246 38.7 1.08 0.77 to 1.47 81.5 1.26 0.80 to 1.88 11.5 0.89 0.51 to 1.44
Nervous system 38 44,151 135,497 35.8 2.33 1.65 to 3.20 63.3 2.13 1.42 to 3.08 18.3 3.17 1.52 to 5.76
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 156 98,475 406,503 35.1 2.24 1.90 to 2.62 65.8 2.26 1.88 to 2.69 15.7 2.16 1.47 to 3.06
Leukemias 77 75,438 271,126 30.1 1.86 1.47 to 2.32 52.1 1.75 1.34 to 2.25 16.1 2.45 1.40 to 3.96
Colorectal 524 317,951 1,529,946 29.1 1.90 1.74 to 2.07 60.2 2.03 1.85 to 2.23 9.4 1.39 1.10 to 1.74
Bladder 256 97,441 591,281 25.2 1.73 1.52 to 1.95 49.5 1.74 1.53 to 1.98 9.8 1.55 0.92 to 2.44
Skin, nonbasal 157 114,591 780,825 19.5 1.16 0.98 to 1.35 40.4 1.24 1.03 to 1.47 6.2 0.88 0.58 to 1.28
Testis 53 18,744 175,272 NA 89.7 1.29 0.97 to 1.68 NA
Prostate 976 364,460 1,946,650 NA 40.7 1.56 1.47 to 1.66 NA
Ovary 44 53,434 238,961 NA NA 18.9 2.47 1.79 to 3.31
Breast 294 417,821 2,837,667 NA NA 9.7 1.35 1.20 to 1.52
Cervix 198 158,969 1,777,803 NA NA 9.1 1.70 1.47 to 1.95
Uterus 63 85,350 756,290 NA NA 6.8 1.05 0.81 to 1.35
All cancer patients with single primary tumor 4,572 2,815,657 14,094,889 32.4 2.06 2.00 to 2.12 65.3 2.23 2.16 to 2.31 11.6 1.61 1.51 to 1.71
General US population 15.8 1 Reference 29.2 1 Reference 7.2 1 Reference

Abbreviations: SMR, standardized mortality ratio; NA, not applicable.

*

Analysis was limited to tumor sites for which at least 100,000 person years were accrued.

Per 100,000 person-years.

Adjusted to the age, race, and sex distributions of patients with a single primary tumor.

§

Reference population: general US population, 1969 to 2002.

Sex-specific analysis, adjusted for age and race distributions of patients with single primary tumor.

Suicide Risk Over Time After Diagnosis

The relative increase in suicide risk among persons with cancer was highest in the first 5 years after diagnosis with cancer and declined gradually thereafter, but remained elevated compared with that of the general US population 15 years after diagnosis. The highest relative suicide risks persisted over time in patients with cancers of the lung and bronchus, oral cavity and pharynx, larynx, nervous system, prostate, and cervix (Table 4).

Table 4.

Suicide in Patients With Cancer by Site and Years Since Diagnosis

Cancer Site* Time Since Diagnosis
0 to 5 Years 5 to 10 Years 10 to 15 Years 15 to 30 Years
All
    No. of suicides 3,202 858 313 199
    Person-years accrued 7,657,131 3,546,942 1,665,199 1,225,617
    SMR 2.38 1.58 1.43 1.43
    95% CI 2.30 to 2.46 1.47 to 1.69 1.28 to 1.60 1.24 to 1.64
Lung and bronchus
    No. of suicides 565 30 8 7
    Person-years accrued 410,217 81,196 31,885 18,012
    SMR† 6.60 2.00 1.42 2.31
    95% CI 6.07 to 7.17 1.35 to 2.86 0.61 to 2.75 0.93 to 4.67
Stomach
    No. of suicides 89 10 1 0
    Person-years accrued 78,953 20,269 8,886 5,378
    SMR 5.16 2.57 0.62 NA
    95% CI 4.15 to 6.35 1.24 to 4.68 0.02 to 3.07
Oral cavity and pharynx
    No. of suicides 142 27 10 12
    Person-years accrued 138,201 58,162 27,669 18,449
    SMR 4.65 2.23 1.81 3.38
    95% CI 3.92 to 5.48 1.47 to 3.23 0.87 to 3.29 1.75 to 5.85
Larynx
    No. of suicides 64 19 11 6
    Person-years accrued 77,607 37,869 19,039 12,628
    SMR 3.27 2.10 2.53 2.17
    95% CI 2.52 to 4.17 1.27 to 3.26 1.26 to 4.48 0.80 to 4.64
Hodgkin's lymphoma
    No. of suicides 25 15 7 3
    Person-years accrued 74,138 44,024 25,765 21,882
    SMR 2.27 2.39 1.96 1.02
    95% CI 1.47 to 3.33 1.34 to 3.92 0.79 to 3.96 0.21 to 2.85
Kidney
    No. of suicides 60 19 8 3
    Person-years accrued 135,349 58,227 26,327 17,542
    SMR 2.25 1.81 1.84 1.14
    95% CI 1.72 to 2.90 1.09 to 2.82 0.79 to 3.57 0.23 to 3.18
Thyroid
    No. of suicides 21 12 4 2
    Person-years accrued 144,650 86,983 50,786 47,828
    SMR 1.29 1.26 0.74 0.40
    95% CI 0.80 to 1.96 0.65 to 2.18 0.20 to 1.83 0.05 to 1.34
Nervous system
    No. of suicides 27 5 3 3
    Person-years accrued 78,245 30,561 15,298 11,394
    SMR 2.59 1.53 2.08 3.25
    95% CI 1.71 to 3.76 0.49 to 3.48 0.42 to 5.83 0.65 to 9.08
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    No. of suicides 116 26 11 3
    Person-years accrued 247,260 96,071 39,611 23,560
    SMR 2.62 1.66 1.81 0.89
    95% CI 2.17 to 3.15 1.08 to 2.42 0.91 to 3.21 0.18 to 2.48
Leukemias
    No. of suicides 56 14 2 5
    Person-years accrued 166,683 62,505 25,581 16,356
    SMR 2.01 1.60 0.68 3.50
    95% CI 1.52 to 2.61 0.88 to 2.67 0.08 to 2.29 1.13 to 7.96
Colorectal
    No. of suicides 367 103 34 20
    Person-years accrued 869,291 371,158 176,756 112,740
    SMR 2.19 1.56 1.16 1.15
    95% CI 1.97 to 2.43 1.27 to 1.89 0.80 to 1.61 0.71 to 1.78
Bladder
    No. of suicides 163 56 26 11
    Person-years accrued 315,809 154,763 73,444 47,266
    SMR 1.99 1.53 1.62 1.15
    95% CI 1.69 to 2.32 1.15 to 1.98 1.06 to 2.37 0.58 to 2.05
Skin, nonbasal
    No. of suicides 90 44 13 10
    Person-years accrued 405,177 202,785 100,902 71,961
    SMR 1.25 1.33 0.84 0.96
    95% CI 1.01 to 1.54 0.97 to 1.78 0.45 to 1.43 0.46 to 1.74
Testis§
    No. of suicides 23 17 8 5
    Person-years accrued 74,154 48,068 28,778 24,272
    SMR 1.35 1.54 1.22 0.91
    95% CI 0.86 to 2.02 0.90 to 2.46 0.53 to 2.36 0.29 to 2.07
Prostate§
    No. of suicides 612 259 80 25
    Person-years accrued 1,260,950 511,800 131,582 42,318
    SMR 1.43 1.55 1.97 2.09
    95% CI 1.31 to 1.54 1.37 to 1.75 1.56 to 2.45 1.35 to 3.08
Ovary§
    No. of suicides 34 7 1 2
    Person-years accrued 134,690 54,942 27,156 22,173
    SMR 3.45 1.74 0.5 1.23
    95% CI 2.39 to 4.81 0.70 to 3.53 0.02 to 2.50 0.14 to 4.17
Breast§
    No. of suicides 178 67 32 17
    Person-years accrued 1,521,683 744,074 343,563 228,346
    SMR 1.57 1.19 1.20 0.92
    95% CI 1.34 to 1.81 0.92 to 1.51 0.82 to 1.69 0.54 to 1.47
Cervix§
    No. of suicides 69 60 29 40
    Person-years accrued 662,264 510,507 308,014 297,018
    SMR 1.56 1.76 1.41 2.00
    95% CI 1.21 to 1.97 1.35 to 2.27 0.94 to 2.01 1.43 to 2.71
Uterus§
    No. of suicides 28 19 8 8
    Person-years accrued 313,013 194,311 122,842 126,120
    SMR 1.20 1.29 0.84 0.79
    95% CI 0.80 to 1.74 0.78 to 2.00 0.36 to 1.63 0.34 to 1.53

Abbreviations: SMR, standardized mortality ratio; NA, not applicable.

*

Analysis was limited to tumor sites for which at least 100,000 person years were accrued.

Adjusted to the age and sex distributions of patients with single primary tumor.

Reference population: general US population, 1969 to 2002.

§

Sex-specific analysis, adjusted to the age distribution of patients with single primary tumor.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of suicide in patients with cancer in the United States is approximately twice that of the general US population. European studies also have observed increased suicide rates in persons with cancer. Using a Danish cancer registry, Yousaf et al14 found SMRs of 1.7 and 1.4 for suicide among men and women, respectively, as compared with those of the general Danish population. In Norway, Hem et al15 reported SMRs of 1.55 and 1.35. In Sweden, Björkenstam et al11 observed an SMR of 2.5 (men and women combined) for the period from 1965 to 1974 and 1.5 for the period from 1985 to 1994. Smaller studies from the United States and Australia have also noted that a history of cancer is associated with increased risk of death by suicide.16,23,24

Using data from the United States similar to those in the present analysis, Kendal25 documented that suicides occurred in 19 per 10,000 men with cancer and four per 10,000 women with cancer. However, because no account was taken of the person-time at risk after a cancer diagnosis, no meaningful comparison could be made to the incidence of suicide in the population as a whole or across patients with different forms of cancer.

We found that lung, stomach, and head and neck cancers were associated with the highest suicide rates. Several studies have observed that cancers at certain anatomic sites are associated with particularly increased suicide rates. However, the sites associated with the greatest risk vary depending on the report.5,7-9,11,12,14,15 The European studies have shown similarly elevated suicide rates in patients with lung cancer, but have not been unanimous in identifying high rates of suicide among those with stomach and head and neck cancers.5,14,15 Although the reasons for particular types of cancers to be associated with increased suicide rates are unknown, it is possible that patients with lung cancer may struggle with their grave prognoses. One study found a 25% prevalence of depression among patients with lung cancer,26 and other work has suggested that lower quality of life in patients with lung cancer is related to emotional distress.27 Examination of psychological reactions in newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer showed high levels of psychological distress.28 Patients with head and neck cancers have a high prevalence of depression as well.29 Head and neck cancers could have a particularly devastating effect on quality of life through their impact on appearance and essential functions such as speech, swallowing, and breathing.30

Characteristics associated with suicide in the cancer population, such as older age and male sex, were similar to those in the general population.31 Suicide risk among patients with cancer as a group was highest in the years immediately after diagnosis, but remained increased for more than 15 years as compared with the suicide rates in the general population. This is similar to the elevation in suicide risk seen in breast cancer survivors in the SEER program, some of whom were included in this study, which lasted more than 25 years after diagnosis even after definitive treatment of their cancers.16 Interpretation of results from patients who survived 15 or more years after their cancer diagnosis was limited by small numbers of suicides associated with some cancer sites. However, in addition to lung and head and neck cancers, cancers of the nervous system, prostate, and cervix seemed to be associated with long-term increases in suicide risk. This is consistent with prior work that observed a high prevalence of depression and distress in patients with brain cancer.32 Other work demonstrated elevated suicide rates among men with prostate cancer in South Florida and suggested that depression was a significant risk factor.33 Similarly, a study in southern New England described depressive symptoms in long-term survivors of cervical cancer.34

Our findings should be interpreted in light of several limitations. First, cause of death may be subject to misclassification bias. Suicide is often difficult to distinguish from homicide or accidental injury and could potentially also be classified as an unexplained death. The literature is not conclusive as to the magnitude of such an effect,35-38 although some work has suggested that suicide codes are generally quite accurate.39

Second, we were unable to evaluate the potential confounding role of comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, including characteristics that could bear on the incidence of cancer (such as tobacco and alcohol use) that may also be associated with an increased risk of suicide. Tobacco40,41 and alcohol use42,43 have been associated with increased suicide risk, although the strengths of these associations vary widely (ranging from relative risk of 1.4 to 4.3) depending on the study. Because tobacco and alcohol use can be common in patients with lung and head and neck cancer,44,45 this may account for some of the increased suicide rates in these groups of patients.

Third, we were unable to censor patients with cancer who died of suicide from the general US population mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. Given the vastly larger number of patients who commit suicide in the general population, the impact of suicides among patients with cancer on the suicide rate of the overall US population can be expected to be negligible. In addition, any bias introduced in this manner would likely be conservative.

Our data suggest that the psychological experience of cancer survivors deserves further attention, as urged by the Institute of Medicine,1,4 particularly because appropriate use of psychosocial interventions in patients with cancer can make a positive impact on quality of life.46 The role of lifestyle factors and comorbidity in determining suicide risk among patients with cancer invites further investigation, and future analyses may be augmented by the SEER-Medicare data set,47 which may help elucidate important relationships with comorbid medical and psychiatric illnesses.

AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Stephanie Misono, Bevan Yueh

Collection and assembly of data: Stephanie Misono, Bevan Yueh

Data analysis and interpretation: Stephanie Misono, Noel S. Weiss, Jesse R. Fann, Mary Redman, Bevan Yueh

Manuscript writing: Stephanie Misono, Noel S. Weiss, Jesse R. Fann, Bevan Yueh

Final approval of manuscript: Stephanie Misono, Noel S. Weiss, Jesse R. Fann, Mary Redman, Bevan Yueh

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on August 11, 2008

Supported by National Institutes of Health Basic Sciences Training in Otolaryngology Grant No. DC00018 (S.M.) and by Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Excellence Grant HFP 83-027 (S.M. and B.Y.).

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Head and Neck Society, August 17-20, 2006, Chicago, IL.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Institute of Medicine and National Research Council: From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2006
  • 2.National Cancer Institute Office of Cancer Survivorship: About Cancer Survivorship Research: History. Rockville, MD, National Cancer Institute. http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/history.html
  • 3.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: A National Action Plan for Cancer Survivorship: Advancing Public Health Strategies. Atlanta, GA, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004
  • 4.Institute of Medicine: Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2007 [PubMed]
  • 5.Allebeck P, Bolund C, Ringback G: Increased suicide rate in cancer patients: A cohort study based on the Swedish Cancer-Environment Register. J Clin Epidemiol 42:611-616, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fox BH, Stanek EJ 3rd, Boyd SC, et al: Suicide rates among cancer patients in Connecticut. J Chronic Dis 35:89-100, 1982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Louhivuori KA, Hakama M: Risk of suicide among cancer patients. Am J Epidemiol 109:59-65, 1979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Levi F, Bulliard JL, La Vecchia C: Suicide risk among incident cases of cancer in the Swiss Canton of Vaud. Oncology 48:44-47, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Storm HH, Christensen N, Jensen OM: Suicides among Danish patients with cancer: 1971 to 1986. Cancer 69:1507-1512, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crocetti E, Arniani S, Acciai S, et al: High suicide mortality soon after diagnosis among cancer patients in central Italy. Br J Cancer 77:1194-1196, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Björkenstam C, Edberg A, Ayoubi S, et al: Are cancer patients at higher suicide risk than the general population? Scand J Public Health 33:208-214, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Allebeck P, Bolund C: Suicides and suicide attempts in cancer patients. Psychol Med 21:979-984, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Innos K, Rahu K, Rahu M, et al: Suicides among cancer patients in Estonia: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer 39:2223-2228, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yousaf U, Christensen ML, Engholm G, et al: Suicides among Danish cancer patients, 1971-1999. Br J Cancer 92:995-1000, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hem E, Loge JH, Haldorsen T, et al: Suicide risk in cancer patients from 1960 to 1999. J Clin Oncol 22:4209-4216, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schairer C, Brown LM, Chen BE, et al: Suicide after breast cancer: An international population-based study of 723,810 women. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1416-1419, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program: Overview of the SEER Program. http://www.seer.cancer.gov [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program: Public-Use Data (1973-2002). Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 2005
  • 19.Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results: Mortality–All COD, Public-Use with State, Total US (1969-2002), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program SEER*Stat Database. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 2005
  • 20.Koepsell TD, Weiss NS: Epidemiologic Methods: Studying the Occurrence of Illness. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2003
  • 21.Breslow NE, Day NE: Statistical methods in cancer research: Volume II—The design and analysis of cohort studies, New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp 1-406 [PubMed]
  • 22.Ury HK, Wiggins AD: Another shortcut method for calculating the confidence interval of a Poisson variable (or of a standardized mortality ratio). Am J Epidemiol 122:197-198, 1985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grabbe L, Demi A, Camann MA, et al: The health status of elderly persons in the last year of life: A comparison of deaths by suicide, injury, and natural causes. Am J Public Health 87:434-437, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruzicka LT, Choi CY, Sadkowsky K: Medical disorders of suicides in Australia: Analysis using a multiple-cause-of-death approach. Soc Sci Med 61:333-341, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kendal WS: Suicide and cancer: A gender-comparative study. Ann Oncol 18:381-387, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carlsen K, Jensen AB, Jacobsen E, et al: Psychosocial aspects of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 47:293-300, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sarna L, Padilla G, Holmes C, et al: Quality of life of long-term survivors of non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:2920-2929, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nordin K, Glimelius B: Psychological reactions in newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer patients. Acta Oncol 36:803-810, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Duffy SA, Ronis DL, Valenstein M, et al: Depressive symptoms, smoking, drinking, and quality of life among head and neck cancer patients. Psychosomatics 48:142-148, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Semple CJ, Sullivan K, Dunwoody L, et al: Psychosocial interventions for patients with head and neck cancer: Past, present, and future. Cancer Nurs 27:434-441, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spicer RS, Miller TR: Suicide acts in 8 states: Incidence and case fatality rates by demographics and method. Am J Public Health 90:1885-1891, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pelletier G, Verhoef MJ, Khatri N, et al: Quality of life in brain tumor patients: The relative contributions of depression, fatigue, emotional distress, and existential issues. J Neurooncol 57:41-49, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Llorente MD, Burke M, Gregory GR, et al: Prostate cancer: A significant risk factor for late-life suicide. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13:195-201, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McCorkle R, Tang ST, Greenwald H, et al: Factors related to depressive symptoms among long-term survivors of cervical cancer. Health Care Women Int 27:45-58, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kleck G: Miscounting suicides. Suicide Life Threat Behav 18:219-236, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maniam T: Suicide and undetermined violent deaths in Malaysia, 1966-1990: Evidence for the misclassification of suicide statistics. Asia Pac J Public Health 8:181-185, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mohler B, Earls F: Trends in adolescent suicide: Misclassification bias? Am J Public Health 91:150-153, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Phillips DP, Ruth TE: Adequacy of official suicide statistics for scientific research and public policy. Suicide Life Threat Behav 23:307-319, 1993 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Moyer LA, Boyle CA, Pollock DA: Validity of death certificates for injury-related causes of death. Am J Epidemiol 130:1024-1032, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miller M, Hemenway D, Bell NS, et al: Cigarette smoking and suicide: A prospective study of 300,000 male active-duty Army soldiers. Am J Epidemiol 151:1060-1063, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miller M, Hemenway D, Rimm E: Cigarettes and suicide: A prospective study of 50,000 men. Am J Public Health 90:768-773, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pirkola SP, Suominen K, Isometsa ET: Suicide in alcohol-dependent individuals: Epidemiology and management. CNS Drugs 18:423-436, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wilcox HC, Conner KR, Caine ED: Association of alcohol and drug use disorders and completed suicide: An empirical review of cohort studies. Drug Alcohol Depend 76:S11-S19, 2004. (suppl) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sturgis EM, Wei Q, Spitz MR: Descriptive epidemiology and risk factors for head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol 31:726-733, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wingo PA, Ries LA, Giovino GA, et al: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1996, with a special section on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:675-690, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rehse B, Pukrop R: Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: Meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Educ Couns 50:179-186, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, et al: Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: Content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40:IV-3-18, 2002. (suppl) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES