Abstract
We evaluated the performance of the Autoscan Walkaway (W/A) system (MicroScan, Sacramento, Calif.) in conjunction with the fluorometric Neg Combo panels for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. Fermentative and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli were tested in parallel with the W/A system and the Cathra Repliscan replicator (C/R) system (Cathra, St. Paul, Minn.). Conventional biochemical testing and agar dilution testing were used to resolve the identification and susceptibility testing discrepancies. Of 495 clinical isolates tested, 445 (90%) were correctly identified by the W/A system and 483 (98%) were correctly identified by the C/R system. Repeat testing by using updated versions of the W/A system's computer identification software failed to demonstrate improved identification accuracy. For susceptibility testing, the W/A system demonstrated 5.6% total interpretative category errors, including only 0.9% major and very major errors. The comparative C/R system produced only 1% errors overall, including 0.2% major and very major errors. Although the W/A system is highly automated and is capable of producing results rapidly, our findings suggest that additional identification and susceptibility testing refinements are needed before the system will be suitable for routine use.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M., Balfour L. C. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):902–905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.902-905.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):659–662. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.659-662.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly M. T., Matsen J. M., Morello J. A., Smith P. B., Tilton R. C. Collaborative clinical evaluation of the Autobac IDX system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;19(4):529–533. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.4.529-533.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Sahm D., O'Hara C., Ciaglia C., Yu M., Yamane N., Scharnweber G., Rhoden D. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1422–1428. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1422-1428.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reiber N. E., Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M., Tison D. L., Hysmith R. M. Comparison of the Cathra Repliscan II, the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card, and the Micro-Media System Fox Panel for dilution susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;21(6):959–962. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.6.959-962.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenover F. C., Mizuki T. S., Carlson L. G. Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A automated microbiology system for the identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1628–1634. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1628-1634.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]