Skip to main content
Molecular Medicine logoLink to Molecular Medicine
. 2009 Mar 14;15(5-6):144–151. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00014

A novel recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the human norepinephrine transporter retains oncolytic potential and facilitates deep tissue imaging

Nanhai Chen 1, Qian Zhang 1, Yong A Yu 1, Jochen Stritzker 1,6, Peter Brader 2,7, Andreas Schirbel 3, Samuel Samnick 3, Inna Serganova 4, Ronald Blasberg 2,4, Yuman Fong 5, Aladar A Szalay 1,6,
PMCID: PMC2654849  PMID: 19287510

Abstract

Noninvasive and repetitive monitoring of a virus in target tissues and/or specific organs of the body is highly desirable for the development of safe and efficient cancer virotherapeutics. We have previously shown that the oncolytic vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 can target and eradicate human tumors in mice and that its therapeutic effects can be monitored using optical imaging. Here, we report on the development of a novel recombinant vaccinia virus (VACV) GLV-1h99, a derivative of GLV-1h68, which was constructed to carry the human norepinephrine transporter gene (hNET) under the VACV synthetic early promoter placed at the F14.5L locus for deep tissue imaging. The hNET protein was expressed at high levels on the membranes of cells infected with this virus. Expression of the hNET protein did not negatively affect virus replication, cytolytic activity in cell culture, and in vivo virotherpeutic efficacy. GLV-1h99-mediated expression of the hNET protein in infected cells resulted in specific uptake of the radiotracer [131I]-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). In mice, GLV-1h99-infected tumors were readily imaged by [124I]-MIBG positron emission tomography. To our knowledge, GLV-1h99 is the first oncolytic virus expressing the hNET protein that can efficiently eliminate tumors and simultaneously allow deep tissue imaging of infected tumors.

Keywords: hNET, PET, oncolytic virotherapy, vaccinia virus, pancreatic cancer,

INTRODUCTION

Oncolytic viral therapy exploits the life cycle of viruses to specifically infect, replicate within, and lyse cancer cells. Many virus types, including adenoviruses (1), herpes simplex viruses (2), Newcastle disease virus (3), myxoma virus (4), vaccinia virus (VACV) (5), and vesicular stomatitis virus (6), are being investigated as potential agents for oncolytic virotherapy of cancer in humans. One of the most attractive reasons for using these live vectors is that they generally kill cancer cells that are high in ribonucleotide reductase, high in DNA repair enzymes, and resistant to apoptosis, all characteristics that would make the tumor cells resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy (7, 8). VACV is particularly attractive as an agent for human treatment because versions of this virus have been given to millions of humans during the smallpox eradication campaign (9).

It is of general interest to try to develop imaging techniques that would track therapeutic gene delivery in gene therapy protocols. The potential importance of noninvasive tracking techniques in human oncolytic virotherapy trials is well documented. A deep tissue imaging technique in tracking virus-infected cells in the body would also allow potential real time, ongoing assessment of therapy and obviate the need for multiple and repeated tissue biopsies. The tracking of viral delivery could give clinicians the ability to correlate efficacy and therapy, as well as monitor of virus toxicity.

This paper describes the construction and functional testing of an engineered virus strain designed to be traceable by molecular imaging in infected tissues. The chosen reporter system is the cell surface human norepinephrine transporter (hNET), which can be imaged by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) using the radiotracer meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) (10, 11). The use of hNET-MIBG reporter imaging is particularly attractive from an investigative standpoint because hNET is a human protein that will not induce immune responses in humans and is only expressed in the central and peripheral sympathetic nervous systems (12). Moreover, MIBG is a standard radiopharmaceutical approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Previously, attempts to image gene transfer therapy by PET using hNET-MIBG reporter imaging were successful in transduced cells and xenografts (11). The feasibility of imaging non-replicating adenovirus expressing the hNET using hNET/11C-m-hydroxyephedrine reporter gene/probe has also been demonstrated (13). However, only one of three adenovirus-transduced tumors could be visualized due to low transduction efficiency and lack of replication. We have previously reported that recombinant VACV GLV-1h68 does preferentially enter and replicate well within human tumors. The viral titer in colonized tumors reached as high as 1 × 109 plaque forming units (PFUs) per gram of tissue (5). Thus, we expect that the higher expression levels of the hNET protein in tumors will result in a higher sensitivity of PET imaging. Here, we report on the construction and characterization of a novel recombinant vaccinia virus GLV-1h99, a derivative of GLV-1h68, which carries the hNET expression cassette under the control of the VACV synthetic early promoter (PE). We have shown that expression of the hNET protein did not have negative effects on virus replication, cytolytic activity in cell culture, or in vivo virotherapeutic efficacy. GLV-1h99 efficiently eliminated tumors in mice, and the tumors infected with GLV-1h99 were readily imaged by [124I]-MIBG PET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Virus and cell culture

African green monkey kidney fibroblast CV-1 cells and human pancreatic ductal carcinoma PANC-1 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Mediatech, Inc., Herndon, VA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Mediatech, Inc., Herndon, VA) at 37°C under 5% CO2. GI-101A cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 1% HEPES, 1% sodium pyruvate, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution and 20% FBS. GLV-1h68 was derived from VACV LIVP, as described previously (5).

Construction of hNET transfer vector

hNET cDNA inserted in a pBluescript II KS+ backbone using the Not I and BamH I sites was provided by Dr. Inna Serganova (Blasberg lab at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center). It was PCR-amplified using pBSII-hNET as the template with primers hNET5 (5′-GTCGAC (Sal I) GCCACCATGCTTCTGGCGCGGATGAA-3′) and hNET3 (5′-GATATC (EcoR V) TCAGATGGCCAGCCAGTGTT-3′). The PCR product was gel-purified, and cloned into the pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vector using the Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). The resulting construct pCRII-hNET1 was sequence-confirmed. The hNET cDNA was released from pCRII-hNET1 with Sal I and EcoR V, and subcloned into the intermediate vector pCR-SE1, precut with Sal I and Sma I. This step put hNET cDNA downstream of the sequence for PE. The viral hNET expression cassette (PE-hNET) was then released from this intermediate construct by BamH I and Hind III and inserted into the same cut viral transfer vector pNCVVf14.5T (Chen, N et al, unpublished data). The final construct FSE-hNET1 was sequence-confirmed and used for insertion of PE-hNET into the F14.5L locus in GLV-1h68.

Generation of hNET-expressing VACV

CV-1 cells were infected with GLV-1h68 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 for 1 hour (hr), then transfected using Fugene (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) with the hNET transfer vector FSE-hNET1. Two days post-infection (dpi), infected/transfected cells were harvested and the recombinant viruses were selected and plaque purified as described previously (14). The genotype of hNET-expressing VACV GLV-1h99 was verified by PCR and sequencing. Also, the lack of expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy. Expression of β-galactosidase and β-glucuronidase was demonstrated by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal, Stratagene, La Jolla, California) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid (X-GlcA, Research Product International Corp., Mt. Prospect, Illinois) staining, respectively.

Protein expression analysis

PANC-1 cells grown in 6-well plates were mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.5. Six, 12, 24, or 48 hours post-infection (hpi)., cells were harvested and lysed in RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The cell lysates were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE, and proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose transfer membrane (Whatman GmbH, Dassel, Germany). The membrane was then incubated with an anti-hNET monoclonal antibody (NET17-1, Mab Technologies, Stone Mountain, CA) at a dilution of 1:500, and detected using a horseradish peroxidase labeled secondary antibody (R1349HRP, Acris Antibodies GmbH, Hiddenhausen, Germany) at a dilution of 1:2000, followed by enhanced chemiluminescence. Quantitative results were obtained using a NightOWL LB 981 imaging system (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany) and were expressed as % expression of maximum level.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

PANC-1 cells grown in a 24-well plate were mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.001. Twenty-four hours after infection the cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and non-permeabilized cells were incubated with an anti-hNET monoclonal antibody (NET17-1, Mab Technologies) at a dilution of 1:500, followed by the incubation with a phycoerythrin-conjugated goat antimouse antibody (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA) at a dilution of 1:100. The pictures were taken using an Olympus 1X71 inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a MicroFire True Color Firewire microscope digital charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Optronics, Goleta, California).

Viral growth curves

PANC-1 cells grown in 6-well plates were infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.01 for 1 hr at 37°C. The inoculum was aspirated and the cell monolayers were washed twice with 2 ml of DPBS (Mediatech, Inc., Herndon, VA). Two ml of cell culture medium containing 2% FBS were added into each well. Three wells of each virus were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. The harvested cells were subject to three cycles of freeze-thaw and were sonicated three times for 1 minute at full power before titration. The virus was titrated in CV-1 cells in duplicates.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay

PANC-1 cells were plated at 2 × 104 cells per well in 96-well plates and incubated in a CO2 incubator overnight. Cells were either mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at MOIs of 0.01 and 10. Viral cytotoxicity was assayed daily for 5 days. Ten μl of culture medium or lysis buffer (9% Triton X-100) were added into each four wells of infected cells. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the cell supernatant and lysate was quantified using a CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results are expressed as the percentage of surviving cells. This percentage was determined using the formula: (cell lysate-supernatant)tx/(cell lysate-supernatant)t0 × 100. In the formula, (cell lysate-supernatant)tx and (cell lysate-supernatant)t0 represent LDH activity in the cells after and before infection, respectively.

Therapy of PANC-1 tumors in nude mice

All mice were cared for and maintained in accordance with animal welfare regulations under an approved protocol by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Explora Biolabs (San Diego Science Center, San Diego, CA). PANC-1 xenograft tumors were developed in 6- to 8-week-old male nude mice (NCI:Hsd:Athymic Nude-Foxn1nu, Harlan) by implanting 5 × 106 PANC-1 cells subcutaneously on the right hind leg. Tumor growth was recorded once a week in three dimensions using a digital caliper. Tumor volume was calculated as ([length × width × height]/2) and reported in mm3. Twenty-seven days after tumor cell implantation, groups of 8 mice were injected with a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of 5 × 106 PFUs of GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 in 100 μl of PBS.

Radiopharmaceuticals

131I-labeled MIBG ([131I]-MIBG) was either purchased from GE Healthcare Buchler GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) or synthetized as described (15). [124I]-MIBG was prepared following a procedure previously reported by Moroz and coworkers (11). The radiochemical purity of the final product was >95% with an overall yield of >80% and the specific activity of 18.5 ± 5.2 MBq/μmol (0.5 ± 0.14 mCi/μmol). The maximum specific activities (no carrier-added synthesis) for the [123I]- and [124I]-labeled compounds were 8.9 and 1.2 TBq/μmol (241 and 33 Ci/μmol), respectively.

In vivo imaging

All animal studies were performed in compliance with all applicable policies, procedures and regulatory requirements of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, the Research Animal Resource Center of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the National Institutes of Health “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”. Two animals bearing two subcutaneous PANC-1 xenografts, one on each flank, measuring ~ 50 mm3, were injected with 1 × 107 PFUs of GLV-1h99 intratumorally into the right flank tumors. Two days after infection 9.25 MBq (250 μCi) of [124I]-MIBG were administered via the tail vein. Potassium iodide was used to block the uptake of radioactive iodide by the thyroid. A [124I]-MIBG PET image was acquired over 10 minutes, 2 hours after tracer administration. Imaging was performed using a Focus 120 microPET dedicated small-animal PET scanner (Concorde Microsystems Inc, Knoxville, TN). Data acquisition and reconstruction was performed as previously described (16). Image analysis was performed using ASIPr (Siemens Pre-clinical Solutions, Knoxville, TN). Regions of Interest (ROIs) were manually drawn over the tumor. Four ROI’s from each tumor were averaged for comparison. The measured radioactivity was expressed as %ID/g; the mean value ± standard deviation was recorded.

Statistical analysis

The significance of differences between different groups was determined using a two-tailed unpaired t-test (Excel 2003, Microsoft, Redmond, WA). P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Construction of the recombinant VACV expressing hNET, GLV-1h99

The construct of GLV-1h99 used in this study was derived from GLV-1h68 by replacing the Renilla luciferase-green fluorescent protein (RUC-GFP) expression cassette at the F14.5L locus with the hNET expression cassette by homologous recombination in infected cells. In GLV-1h99, hNET expression is under the control of the VACV PE. The genotype of GLV-1h99 (Figure 1) was verified by PCR and sequencing. Lack of GFP expression was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and expression of β-galactosidase and β-glucuronidase was demonstrated by X-gal and X-GLcA staining, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1 online).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the genomic structure of the GLV-1h99 novel virus strain. GLV-1h99 was derived from GLV-1h68 by replacing the RUC-GFP expression cassette at the F14.5L locus with the hNET expression cassette through in vivo homologous recombination. Both viruses contain lacZ and gusA expression cassettes at J2R and A56R loci, respectively. PE, PE/L, P11, and P7.5 are VACV synthetic early, synthetic early/late, 11K, and 7.5K promoters, respectively. TFR is human transferrin receptor inserted in the reverse orientation with respect to the promoter PE/L.

hNET protein expression detected by Western blot

To show hNET protein expression by GLV-1h99, PANC-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h99 or its parent virus GLV-1h68, and harvested at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hpi. The hNET protein was detected by Western blot analysis using monoclonal anti-hNET antibody. As shown in Figure 2, only GLV-1h99-infected cells expressed the hNET protein with increasing concentration of the protein during the first 24 hpi and slightly decreased hNET expression at 48 hpi when compared to the maximum at 24 hpi. Cells either mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 did not express the hNET protein. Two major bands (approximate 35 and 47 kDa) were detected in GLV-1h99-infected cells. The band of 47 kDa was similar to the reported unglycoslated form of the hNET protein (17). The 35 kDa band might be a degradation product. The hNET protein was also detected in CV-1 cells infected with GLV-1h99 (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Western blot analysis on the hNET protein expression in PANC-1 cells infected with GLV-1h99. PANC-1 cells were either mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.5 for 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, respectively. The hNET protein was detected by Western blot analysis using monoclonal anti-hNET antibody. Only GLV-1h99-infected cells expressed the hNET protein, but cells either mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 did not. The arrows indicate the different forms of the hNET protein detected in GLV-1h99-infected cells. The molecular weight marker bands (in kDa) are shown on the left.

hNET protein present on the cell surface

The hNET protein belongs to a family of Na+/Cl-dependent transporters that contain multiple transmembrane domains. To determine whether the hNET protein expressed by GLV-1h99 was correctly presented on the cell membrane, PANC-1 cells were infected with GLV-1h99 and fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde without cell permeabilization. The hNET protein was visualized using a monoclonal anti-hNET antibody NET17-1 that recognizes the extracellular domain of the protein. As shown in Figure 3, mock or GLV-1h68-infected cells (as demonstrated by GFP expression) did not show hNET protein expression, whereas the hNET protein on the cell surface of PANC-1 cells infected with GLV-1h99 was readily detectable by immunofluorescence microscopy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Localization of the hNET protein on the cell membrane of non-permeabilized PANC-1 cells infected with GLV-1h99. PANC-1 cells were mock-infected or infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.001 for 24 hours. The hNET protein was detected by immunofluorescence microscopy using monoclonal anti-hNET antibody NET17-1, which recognizes the extracellular domain of the protein. Mock- or GLV-1h68-infected cells (as demonstrated by GFP expression) did not express the hNET protein, whereas the hNET protein on the cell membrane of PANC-1 cells infected with GLV-1h99 was readily detectable.

Expression of the hNET protein under the control of the PE did not have negative effects on virus growth in vitro

Whether hNET protein expression would affect VACV replication was unknown. To evaluate the effect of hNET protein expression on VACV replication, PANC-1 cells were infected with either GLV-1h99 or its parent virus, GLV-1h68, at a MOI of 0.01 and the infected cells were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. The viral titers at each time point were determined in CV-1 cells using standard plaque assays. GLV-1h99 gave significantly higher viral yields (P < 0.01) at all time points in comparison with its parent virus, GLV-1h68 (Figure 4), indicating that expression of the hNET protein under the control of the PE did not have negative effects on virus growth in vitro. This experiment was repeated once and similar results were obtained.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GLV-1h99 growth curve in PANC-1 cells. PANC-1 cells grown in 6-well plates were infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.01. Three wells of each virus were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. GLV-1h99 gave significantly higher viral yields (P < 0.01) at all time points compared with its parent virus, GLV-1h68. The values are the mean of triplicate samples, and the bars indicate SD. Representative of two independent experiments.

Expression of the hNET protein did not affect cytolytic activity of VACV in cell cultures

To investigate whether expression of hNET would affect cytolytic activity of VACV in cell cultures, PANC-1 cells were infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at both low (0.01) and high (10) MOIs. Viral cytotoxicity was measured daily for 5 days. At the MOI of 10, initially most of the tumor cells were infected. The survival curves for GLV-1h68 and GLV-1h99 were almost identical, indicating that the cells infected by either of the virus strains were dying at similar levels. The infected cells started to die on the second day of infection. By day 4, about 70% of the tumor cells were killed by both virus strains (Figure 5). However, at the MOI of 0.01, initially only small portion of cells was infected. The cells in infected wells continued to grow within two days of infection, and thereafter cell numbers started to decline on day 3 post-infection. By day 5, more than 90% of the cells were killed by GLV-1h68 as well as by GLV-1h99. Although survival curves for GLV-1h68 and GLV-1h99 were similar, the percentages of cell survival after GLV-1h99 infection were consistently lower than after GLV-1h68 infection at all time points except for 72 hpi. The difference in percentages of cell survival after GLV-1h99 and GLV-1h68 infection was statistically significant (P < 0.001) at 96 hpi, indicating that GLV-1h99 showed slightly better cytolytic activity. This finding is consistent with the enhanced replication of GLV-1h99 in PANC-1 cells as shown earlier. It is important to note that the growth pattern of infected tumor cells in tissue culture mimicked the infected tumor growth pattern in mice. This experiment was repeated once and similar results were obtained.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Tumor cell killing in cell cultures by GLV-1h99. PANC-1 cells were infected with GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99 at MOIs of 0.01 and 10. Cell viability was determined using CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Cell viability before infection was set at 100%. The values are the mean of quadruple samples, and the bars indicate SD. Representative of two independent experiments.

Expression of the hNET protein did not have a negative effect on vaccinia virotherapy

Previously, we showed that GLV-1h68 was able to eradicate solid human breast and pancreatic tumors in nude mice after a single i.v. application (5, 18). To find out whether replacing the RUC-GFP expression cassette in GLV-1h68 with the hNET expression cassette would negatively affect its viral-therapeutic effects, we treated human pancreatic tumors in nude mice with either GLV-1h68 or GLV-1h99. The growth of tumors treated with GLV-1h68 occurred in three distinct phases: growth, inhibition, and regression, as described previously (5). The tumors treated with GLV-1h99 showed a similar growth pattern but tumor shrinkage was observed one week earlier than with GLV-1h68-treated tumors (Figure 6). The size of tumors treated with GLV-1h99 was significantly smaller than that treated with GLV-1h68 on day 21 after virus administration and thereafter (P < 0.05). Obviously, expression of the hNET protein did not seem to have a negative effect on vaccinia virotherapy. The accelerated tumor shrinkage by GLV-1h99 was predicted by the enhanced viral replication and cytotoxicity in tissue culture in comparison with its parental virus, GLV-1h68. This experiment was repeated once and similar results were obtained. GLV-1h99 showed also better therapeutic efficacy than GLV-1h68 when human breast GI-101A tumors in nude mice were treated (data not shown).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Therapy of human pancreatic ductal carcinoma PANC-1 in nude mice with GLV-1h99. Both GLV-1h68 and GLV-1h99 can shrink PANC-1 tumors. The tumors treated with GLV-1h99 started to shrink one week earlier than GLV-1h68-treated tumors. The values are the mean of eight samples, and the bars indicate SD. Representative of two independent experiments.

In vivo imaging of tumors infected with GLV-1h99

Next we wanted to investigate whether the GLV-1h99-mediated expression of the hNET protein resulted in specific uptake of the radiotracer [131I]-MIBG. This radiotracer can be used for non-invasive imaging of functional norepinephrine transporter (19). Preliminary studies were performed to confirm that [131I]-MIBG accumulated in GLV-1h99-infected GI-101A and PANC-1 cells in vitro (results not shown). GLV-1h68 Mock-infected PANC-1 cells retained only minimal amounts of the radiotracer. Therefore, GLV-1h99 led to expression of a functional norepinephrine transporter, which resulted in the specific uptake of [131I]-MIBG.

After successful cell culture uptake studies we wanted to show the feasibility of using GLV-1h99 in combination with MIBG to image infected PANC-1 tumors. Therefore, the hNET protein expression in the PANC-1 tumor-bearing animals after GLV-1h99 administration was visualized by [124I]-MIBG PET. [124I]-MIBG was intravenously administered 48 hours after intratumoral virus injection and PET imaging was performed 2 hours after radiotracer administration. Tumor radioactivity values (%ID/g) were measured. The levels of radioactivity in the PANC-1 tumors after injection of GLV-1h99 were 1.56 ± 0.64 and 1.74 ±0.61, compared with 0.88 ± 0.10 and 0.83 ±0.11 in tumors that were injected with PBS 48 hrs prior to [124I]-MIBG administration. The values from PBS-injected tumors were hardly above the background uptake that made the tumors hardly visible whereas the GLV-1h99-injected tumors were readily detectable (Figure 7). Usually radioactivity of 1.5 to 2X above the background is easily detected by PET scanning. A GLV-1h68 control was not included in this experiment since the in vitro radiotracer uptake experiment showed that PANC-1 cells infected with GLV-1h68 did not significantly take up the radiotracer, and nearly the same low tumor-to-organ radioactivity ratios were found for the GLV-1h68 and PBS control groups of animals (data not shown). In another experiment, 5 athymic nu/nu female mice with orthotopic pleural mesothelioma were injected with 1 × 107 PFUs of GLV-1h99 intrapleurally. The viral localization was successfully visualized by [124I]-MIBG PET imaging of the hNET protein expression in tumors both at 48 and 72 hpi, although the highest levels of radioactivity in the tumors were found 48 hpi. The only low levels of radioactivity were observed in the tumors injected with GLV-1h68 or PBS (data not shown). The presence of the virus in tumors was confirmed by immunohistochemistry staining of tumors using X-gal for lacZ expression (data not shown).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

[124I]-MIBG PET scan 48 hours after infection. 1 × 107 PFUs of GLV-1h99 were injected intratumorally into the right flank tumor (~50mm3) of the mouse bearing PANC-1 tumors on both sides. The scan was obtained 2 hours after systemic radiotracer administration.

DISCUSSION

VACV is arguably the most successful biologic therapy agent, since versions of this virus were given to millions of humans during the smallpox eradication campaign (20). Recently, attention has focused on using this family of viruses in the treatment of cancer, either as cancer vaccines or as oncolytic virotherapeutic agents. Various recombinant versions of this virus have been used to lyse tumor cells ex vivo and in vivo in order to stimulate the native immune response to cancer (21, 22). More recently, engineered VACVs have also been successfully used as direct oncolytic agents, capable of preferentially infecting, replicating within, and killing a wide variety of cancer cell types (2325). One such promising virus strain is GLV-1h68. This strain has shown efficacy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, breast cancer, anaplastic thyroid cancer, and pancreatic cancer (5, 18, 23, 26), and is currently being tested in phase I human trials. In this report we describe experiments that led to the generation of a novel recombinant VACV derived from GLV-1h68 with the additional capability of facilitating noninvasive imaging of tumors and metastases. To our knowledge, GLV-1h99 is the first oncolytic virus expressing the hNET protein that can efficiently eliminate tumors and simultaneously facilitate deep tissue imaging of infected tumors. We believe that the GLV-1h99 virus construct is a promising candidate for future clinical studies combining deep tissue imaging and oncolytic virotherapy.

VACV gene transcription occurs in a temporal manner with early genes transcribed within the core of the virus particle soon after infection, whereas intermediate and late genes transcribe in the cytoplasm of infected cells after viral DNA replication. The early, intermediate, and late mRNA synthesis was detectable within 20, 100, and 140 minutes of infection, respectively (27). The strength of vaccinia promoters also varies. The vaccinia promoters PE, synthetic early/late (PE/L), and synthetic late (PL) are very well studied. PE is the weakest among the three promoters, but is stronger than native early promoters, whereas PE/L is comparable to or slightly stronger than PL. Initially, we tried to generate recombinant VACVs expressing the hNET protein under the control of all three promoters (PE, PE/L and PL) in order to evaluate the effect of the levels and temporal manner of the hNET protein expression on virus replication, therapy, and imaging. The use of a PE/L or PL at the F14.5L locus failed to generate any recombinants. Over-expression and/or constitutive expression of hNET seemed to be toxic to the virus. We were able to generate, however, a recombinant virus strain that expressed the hNET protein under the control of the PE. Western blot studies showed that the hNET protein expression in PANC-1 cells infected with GLV-1h99 at a MOI of 0.5 became detectable at 6 hpi and reached the maximum at 24 hpi, followed by a slight decline at 48 hpi. The lower level of the protein detected at 48 hpi was probably due to the cell killing by the virus. The hNET protein was properly transported to the cell membrane, as demonstrated by fluorescence microscopy.

The hNET protein belongs to a family of Na+/Cl-dependent transporters that contain multiple transmembrane domains, mediating the transport of norepinephrine, dopamine, and epinephrine across the cell membrane. GLV-1h99-mediated expression of the hNET protein in both infected PANC-1 and GI-101A cells resulted in specific uptake of the radiotracer [131I]- MIBG, indicating that the functional hNET protein was expressed on the cell membrane of GLV-1h99-infected cells. In PANC-1 cells, the uptake of [131I]-MIBG reached the maximum at 24 hpi and started to decrease at 48 hpi, correlating well with the hNET protein expression level observed in the Western blot studies. In mice, two PANC-1 tumors infected with GLV-1h99 were readily detectable by PET. In a separate experiment, five GLV-1h99-infected orthotopic pleural mesothelioma tumors were also successfully imaged by [124I]-MIBG PET. In contrast, only 1 of 3 tumors transduced by the hNET expressing non-replicating adenovirus was reported to be visible by PET (13). The better performance by GLV-1h99 could be due to its higher infection efficiency, replication and spreading capabilities. To our knowledge, GLV-1h99 is the first oncolytic virus that expresses hNET.

The most important characteristic of an oncolytic agent, however, is its ability to infect, replicate within, and kill tumor cells. The exploitation of the natural life cycle of viruses is the basis of the entire field of oncolytic virotherapy. VACV has many characteristics desirable in an oncolytic virus: 1) It has a short, well-characterized life cycle and spreads very rapidly from cell to cell; 2) It is highly cytolytic for a broad range of tumor cell types; 3) It has a large insertion capacity (> 25 kb) for the expression of exogenous genes; 4) It is genetically very stable; 5) It is amenable to large scale production of high levels of infectious virus; 6) It does not cause any known diseases in humans; 7) It does not integrate into the host genome; 8) It was used as smallpox vaccine in millions of people with well-documented side effects. These features make VACV an excellent choice as a therapeutic agent for cancer virotherapy. Other viruses, including adenoviruses, herpes simplex viruses, and Newcastle disease viruses, underwent or are presently undergoing clinical testing for cancer therapy in humans. The novel strain GLV-1h99 was effective in cell culture and in a xenograft model at killing cancer cells and eradicating tumors. This indicated that expression of the hNET protein did not negatively affect virus replication, cytolytic activity in cell culture, or in vivo virotherpeutic efficacy. In fact, viral replication and oncolytic effects seem to be slightly improved due to the exchange of expression cassettes. These enhanced effects could not be due to the function of the hNET protein. Instead, the difference in promoter strength between the PE that drives hNET expression and the PE/L that controls the substituted RUC-GFP expression in GLV-1h68 might explain the difference in viral replication. PE/L was shown to be more than 100 times stronger than PE (28). We also found that virus replication in cell culture was inversely proportionate to the strength of promoters used in foreign gene expression inserted into the viral genome (data not shown).

The tumor system studied in the current paper was pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This is an aggressive cancer that is almost uniformly fatal, with a median survival of 6–12 months (29). Furthermore, most pancreatic adenocarcinomas are resistant to chemotherapy and to radiation therapy. Thus, the significant efficacy that GLV-1h99 showed against pancreatic tumors justifies further studies, as well as the initiation of clinical trials. These encouraging results should not only stimulate future studies of the use of MIBG scanning in the monitoring of GLV-1h99 therapy, but also suggest its dual function in general as a therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Supplemental Data

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Terry Trevino, Johanna Langbein and Rosana Magpantay for excellent technical support, and Andrea Feathers for editorial support. This work was supported by grants from Genelux Corporation (R&D facility in San Diego). The hNET plasmid construction and imaging was supported by NIH grants R25T-CA096945, P50 CA86438, and DOE grant FG03-86ER60407. Services provided by the MSKCC Small-Animal Imaging Core Facility, supported in part by NIH Small-Animal Imaging Research Program (SAIRP) Grant No R24 CA83084 and NIH Center Grant No P30 CA08748, are gratefully acknowledged. YF was partly supported by a grant from the Flight Attendant’s Medical Research Institute.

Footnotes

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Nanhai Chen, Qian Zhang, Yong A. Yu, Jochen Stritzker and Aladar Szalay, are affiliated with Genelux Corporation. No competing financial interests exist for Peter Brader, Andreas Schirbel, Samuel Samnick, Inna Serganova, Ronald Blasberg and Yuman Fong.

REFEFENCES

  • 1.Vasey PA, Shulman LN, Campos S, et al. Phase I trial of intraperitoneal injection of the E1B-55-kd-gene-deleted adenovirus ONYX-015 (dl1520) given on days 1 through 5 every 3 weeks in patients with recurrent/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1562–1569. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adusumilli PS, Stiles BM, Chan MK, et al. Real-time diagnostic imaging of tumors and metastases by use of a replication-competent herpes vector to facilitate minimally invasive oncological surgery. FASEB J. 2006;20:726–728. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5316fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sinkovics JG, Horvath JC. Newcastle disease virus (NDV): brief history of its oncolytic strains. J Clin Virol. 2000;16:1–15. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(99)00072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Woo Y, Kelly KJ, Stanford MM, et al. Myxoma virus is oncolytic for human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2329–2335. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9924-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang Q, Yu YA, Wang E, et al. Eradication of solid human breast tumors in nude mice with an intravenously injected light-emitting oncolytic vaccinia virus. Cancer Res. 2007;67:10038–10046. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barber GN. Vesicular stomatitis virus as an oncolytic vector. Viral Immunol. 2004;17:516–527. doi: 10.1089/vim.2004.17.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adusumilli PS, Chan MK, Hezel M, et al. Radiation-induced cellular DNA damage repair response enhances viral gene therapy efficacy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:258–269. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9127-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Petrowsky H, Roberts GD, Kooby DA, et al. Functional interaction between fluorodeoxyuridine-induced cellular alterations and replication of a ribonucleotide reductase-negative herpes simplex virus. J Virol. 2001;75:7050–7058. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.7050-7058.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roizman B, Joklik W, Fields B, Moss B. The destruction of smallpox virus stocks in national repositories: a grave mistake and a bad precedent. Infect Agents Dis. 1994;3:215–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shulkin BL, Shapiro B, Tobes MC, et al. Iodine-123-4-amino-3-iodobenzylguanidine, a new sympathoadrenal imaging agent: comparison with iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:1138–1142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moroz MA, Serganova I, Zanzonico P, et al. Imaging hNET reporter gene expression with 124I-MIBG. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:827–836. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Axelrod J, Kopin IJ. The uptake, storage, release and metabolism of noradrenaline in sympathetic nerves. Prog Brain Res. 1969;31:21–32. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buursma AR, Beerens AM, de Vries EF, et al. The human norepinephrine transporter in combination with 11C-m-hydroxyephedrine as a reporter gene/reporter probe for PET of gene therapy. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:2068–2075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Falkner FG, Moss B. Transient dominant selection of recombinant vaccinia viruses. J Virol. 1990;64:3108–3111. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.6.3108-3111.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Samnick S, Kirsch CM. A simple and rapid routine preparation of no-carrier added meta-I-123- and I-131-iodobenzylguanidine (I-123-MIBG and I-131-MIBG) for clinical nuclear medicine applications. Nuklearmedizin. 1999;38:292–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brader P, Stritzker J, Riedl CC, et al. Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 facilitates tumor detection by positron emission tomography and optical imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2295–2302. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Melikian HE, McDonald JK, Gu H, Rudnick G, Moore KR, Blakely RD. Human norepinephrine transporter. Biosynthetic studies using a site-directed polyclonal antibody. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12290–12297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu YA, Galanis C, Woo Y, et al. Regression of human pancreatic tumor xenografts in mice after a single systemic injection of recombinant vaccinia virus GLV-1h68. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:141–151. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anton M, Wagner B, Haubner R, et al. Use of the norepinephrine transporter as a reporter gene for non-invasive imaging of genetically modified cells. J Gene Med. 2004;6:119–126. doi: 10.1002/jgm.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thorne SH, Hwang TH, Kirn DH. Vaccinia virus and oncolytic virotherapy of cancer. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2005;7:359–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pantuck AJ, van Ophoven A, Gitlitz BJ, et al. Phase I trial of antigen-specific gene therapy using a recombinant vaccinia virus encoding MUC-1 and IL-2 in MUC-1-positive patients with advanced prostate cancer. J Immunother. 2004;27:240–253. doi: 10.1097/00002371-200405000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marshall JL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, et al. Phase I study of sequential vaccinations with fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM alone and sequentially with vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:720–731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin SF, Yu Z, Riedl C, et al. Treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in vitro with a mutant vaccinia virus. Surgery. 2007;142:976–983. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.017. discussion 976–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chalikonda S, Kivlen MH, O'Malley ME, et al. Oncolytic virotherapy for ovarian carcinomatosis using a replication-selective vaccinia virus armed with a yeast cytosine deaminase gene. Cancer Gene Ther. 2008;15:115–125. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chang E, Chalikonda S, Friedl J, et al. Targeting vaccinia to solid tumors with local hyperthermia. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16:435–444. doi: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kelly KJ, Woo Y, Brader P, et al. Novel oncolytic agent GLV-1h68 is effective against malignant pleural mesothelioma. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19:774–782. doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baldick CJ, Jr, Moss B. Characterization and temporal regulation of mRNAs encoded by vaccinia virus intermediate-stage genes. J Virol. 1993;67:3515–3527. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.6.3515-3527.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chakrabarti S, Sisler JR, Moss B. Compact, synthetic, vaccinia virus early/late promoter for protein expression. Biotechniques. 1997;23:1094–1097. doi: 10.2144/97236st07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferrone CR, Brennan MF, Gonen M, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:701–706. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0384-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at North Shore LIJ

RESOURCES