Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Oct 4;46(12):3780–3784. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.063

Phototoxicity of Phenylenediamine Hair Dye Chemicals in Salmonella typhimurium TA102 and Human Skin Keratinocytes

Hongtao Yu 1, Mosley-Foreman 1, Jaehwa Choi 1, Shuguang Wang 1
PMCID: PMC2655141  NIHMSID: NIHMS82356  PMID: 18940226

Abstract

Phenylenediamines (PD) are dye precursors used to manufacture hair dyes. The three PDs, 1,2-, 1,3-, and 1,4-PD and three chlorinated PDs, 4-chloro-1,2-PD, 4-chloro-1,3- PD, and 4,5-dichloro-1,2-PD were studied for their mutagenic effect in Salmonella typhimurium TA 102, cytotoxicity in human skin keratinocyte cells, and for DNA cleavage. The results show that all six compounds are not toxic/mutagenic in TA 102 bacteria or skin cells, and do not cause DNA cleavage in ΦX 174 phage DNA. If the same tests are carried out by exposing them to light irradiation concurrently, all three chlorinated PDs cause mutation in TA 102 bacteria and single strand cleavage in ΦX 174 phage DNA. This indicates that chlorination of the PDs makes these compounds more photochemically active and produces reactive species that cause DNA damage and mutation. For the photocytotoxicity test in skin cells, it appears there is no such structure-activity relationship. Two chlorinated PDs and two non-chlorinated PDs are cytotoxic at a fairly high concentration (1000 µM) upon exposure to light irradiation.

Introduction

Phenylenediamines (PD) are a class of aromatic amino compounds primarily used in the manufacture of dyes and pigments (Anderson, 2000; Corbett, 1999; Nagata et al., 1999; Nohynek et al., 2004; Sardas et al., 1997). It is believed that these chemicals contribute to the influx of worker-related cancer risk in the dye manufacturing industry (Altekruse et al., 1999; Ames et al., 1975; Callender, 1987; Gago-Dominguez et al., 2001; Gago-Dominguez et al., 2003; Green et al., 1987; Guthrie et al., 1995; Helzlsouer et al., 2003; Henley and Thun, 2001; Kogevinas et al., 2006; Nagata et al., 1999; Sardas et al., 1997). PD exposure is somewhat unavoidable, affecting approximately 15 million people since they are used in dyes directly as color-yielding compounds, including hair and fabric dyes or indirectly as intermediates and photographic development fluids. Toxicological studies of 1,2-PD (OPD) have found it to be toxic, a potential carcinogen, and a possible sensitizer (Burnett et al., 1982; Chen et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2007; Hueber-Becker et al., 2007; Imaida et al., 1983; Nishi and Nishioka, 1982). OPD dihydrochloride and 4-chloro-1,2-PD (4-Cl-OPD) demonstrated carcinogenic activity when tested in male Charles River CD rats, random-bred albino CD-1 mice derived from HaM/ICR and Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice of both sexes. Similarly, 1,3-PD (MPD) has been ascertained to be toxic and a possible mutagen with the risk of irreversible effects (Amo et al., 1988). Although MPD was not carcinogenic in rats or mice, the chlorine-substituted analogs at the position para to an amine group produced a carcinogenic compound (Callender, 1987; NCI, 1978; Staedtler et al., 1999; Suter et al., 1998; Willis, 1992). Hair coloring products are grouped into four categories: (1) oxidative dyes (permanent); (2) direct dyes (temporary or semi-permanent); (3) metal salts; and (4) natural dyes. All permanent hair coloring products contain an oxidizing agent and an alkalizing ingredient as part of their ammonia or ammonia substitute unit. Temporary hair coloring agents contain large pigment molecules unable to diffuse into the hair shaft, adsorbing to the hair follicle, which allows only surface coating. Semi-permanent dyes are formulated to deposit color on the hair shaft without lightening it; however, they have smaller molecules than temporary dyes and penetrate the hair shaft. Metal salts are applied to darken graying hair; while, natural dyes are made from plant extracts and less commonly used (Mederos et al., 1999). Amongst the primary intermediates is para-PD (PPD). Oxidation of primary intermediates and coupling with modifiers, which include meta-substituted aromatic derivatives such as MPD, results in colored reaction products.

It is known that aromatic compounds absorb sunlight and can cause phototoxicity (Arfsten et al., 1996; Yu, 2002). The PDs may belong to this type of compounds which can absorb sunlight and cause phototoxicity. For this study, we choose six commercially available PDs: three non-chlorinated and three chlorinated. They include OPD, 4-Cl-OPD, 4,5-dichloro-o-PD (4,5-Cl2-OPD), MPD, 4-chloro-m-PD (4-Cl-MPD), and PPD (Figure 1). We use the following assay to study whether these compounds are phototoxic/photomutagenic and whether the toxicity depends on the structure of the selected PDs: bacteria photomutagenicity, cytotoxicity in human skin cells, and DNA cleavage.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structure of chlorinated and non-chlorinated phenylenediamines for this study.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP), and PDs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, WI). Dr. Bruce Ames from the University of California (Berkeley, CA) provided the Salmonella typhimurium strain TA 102 (Levin et al., 1982; Levin et al., 1984; Maron and Ames, 1983). Dr. Norbert Fusenig of the German Cancer Research Centre (Heidelberg, Germany) kindly provided the HaCaT keratinocytes, the predominant cell type in the epidermis (Boukamp et al., 1988). The following materials were purchased from American Type Cell Culture (Manassas, VA): Trypsin EDTA, Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), and Dulbecco’s minimum essential medium (DMEM). Penicillin/streptomycin and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were from Fisher Scientific (Houston, TX).

Light source

The irradiation source used was a 300 W Xenon lamp from ORIEL Instruments (Stratford, CT). It encompasses the UVA, UVB, and visible light regions of the solar radiation. The emission spectrum of the lamp is similar to the solar radiation, but with higher percent of UVA light. A Pyrex glass filter was placed atop the platform aligned with the pathway of the light beam. This arrangement allowed the sample contained within its respective Petri dish to be placed atop the platform and irradiated by the light beam positioned beneath it. The Pyrex glass also served as a filter to remove light of wavelengths <300 nm. A 15 min irradiation produces a light dose of 3.3 J/cm2 of UVA and 6.3 J/cm2 of visible light

Photo-Ames test

The light-induced mutagenicity assay was carried out with Salmonella typhimurium bacteria strain TA 102 as previously described (Wang et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2005; Yan et al., 2004). PDs were dissolved in DMSO and adjusted to desired concentrations. Test tubes containing 3.5 mL of 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 700 µL of the PD solution in DMSO, and 700 µL of TA 102 in solution were vortexed and placed into the gyrorotatory incubator for 20 min at 210 rpm to homogenize. Then, the 0.7 mL of this bacteria-PD mixture was pipetted into test tubes containing 2.0 mL of the top agar prepared the previous day in the Dri-bath at 45°C. The mixture was gently vortexed and poured onto the minimal agar petri dishes. The control petri dishes were kept in the dark and covered with aluminum foil while the other petri dishes were irradiated in an inverted position on the light source platform for 15 min rotated at 7.5 min. Two negative controls containing 4% DMSO in culture medium were used with one placed in the gyrorotatory incubator for 20 min and the other not. The positive control chemical used in this study was 8-MOP (10 µg/plate) irradiated for 2 min. After irradiation, the control and irradiated petri dishes were incubated for 48 hrs at 37°C and the number of revertant colonies was counted with a colony counter (Bantex, Model 920A). A repeat experiment was carried out to ensure quality of the data.

Cytotoxicity in human skin keratinocytes

The culture and treatment of the human skin HaCaT keratinocytes followed the procedure published previously (Wang et al., 2007). The cells were grown in the media containing 10% FBS in DMEM and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in CO2 incubator (5% CO2) at 37°C. After reaching the desired cell concentration, it was washed twice with 1× PBS, treated with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, and incubated for an additional 10 min at 37°C to ensure cell detachment. The detached cells in suspension were centrifuged for 5 min at 2000 rpm, supernatant discarded, cell pellet washed twice with 1× PBS, and finally resuspended with 1× PBS to adjust the concentration to ~ 1 × 105 cells/mL.

Two 96-well plates (one as control without light irradiation) were divided into six nine-well regions. Equal volumes (100 µL) of the cell suspension and PD in 1×PBS with 4% DMSO were added to the designated regions of the nine wells of the 96-well plates. Each region of the plate represented a different PD concentration. The desired concentrations of PD in 4% DMSO were achieved via serial dilutions of the DMSO stock solution with PBS (0–50 µM or 0–1000 µM). The control plates were in the absence of light for a total of 135 min. The treated plates were irradiated region-by-region for 15 min each. After irradiation, each well is added with MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and the absorption at 540 nm was read to determine the amount of viable cells. The yellow tetrazolium MTT is a hydrogen acceptor that is absorbed by viable cells and reduced in the mitochondria. This results in the formation of an intracellular purple formazan salt.

DNA cleavage

The ability of causing light-induced DNA cleavage by PDs was examined with ΦX174 phage DNA (3.6 *106 Da, 5386 base pairs) as described before (Dong et al., 2000; Dong et al., 2000). Solutions of PDs in methanol were prepared and combined with the ΦX174 DNA solution in 3×8 Titertek plate wells. Each well contained 54 µL of the DNA solution (27 µM base pairs) and 6 µL of the PD solution in methanol. The blank control was added with 6 µL of methanol. The plate was irradiated with the 300 Xe lamp for 20 min. After irradiation, each well of the Titertek plate was added with 10 µL of a gel-loading dye solution (bromophenol blue and xylene cyanole in 50% glycerol). Then, 10 µL of the sample was loaded onto the pre-prepared 1% agarose gel and underwent electrophoresis. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and analyzed with the NucleoVision 740 Gel Documentation System (NucleoTech Inc.) for quantification of the DNA.

Statistical Analysis

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the statistical difference for the data. The P-value of < 0.05 indicated there was a significant difference in the data.

Results

Photomutagencity test in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA102

All six selected PDs were examined whether they are directly mutagenic or photomutagenic. As shown in Figure 2, if TA102 is exposed to 4-Cl-OPD without light irradiation, the number of revertant colonies remains the same in the concentration range examined. But, if it is also exposed to light irradiation (300 W Xenon), the number of revertant colonies increases with the increasing concentration of 4-Cl-OPD and reached over 2000 at 5 µM, and then starts to decrease. At the highest concentration examined (125 µM), the number of revertant colonies is 1251 (Table 1). This indicates that 4-Cl-OPD is not mutagenic without light irradiation, but it is mutagenic when irradiated. At high 4-Cl-OPD concentrations, it becomes phototoxic to TA 102 shown by the decreasing number of revertant colonies. 4-Cl-MPD and 4,5-Cl2-OPD are also photomutagenic, but with smaller number of revertant colonies (Table 1). However, OPD, MPD, and PPD are all not mutagenic or photomutagenic. It appears that chlorine substitution is critical for the PDs to be photomutagenic in TA 102.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photomutagenicity assay of 4-chloro-1,2-phenylenediamine in TA 102. Bacteria and a test chemical were mixed in agar plates and irradiated for 15 min by a 300 W Xe lamp. The light dose was 3.3 J/cm2 of UVA and 6.3 J/cm2 of visible light.

Table 1.

Number of revertant colonies/plate due to exposure to phenylenediamine alone (without light) or to light and phenylenediamine at 5 µM or 125 µM (with light)*

Conc. (µM) No light Std. Dev. With light Std. Dev.
OPD 5 330 50 596 21
125 335 42 715 90
MPD 5 293 103 367 32
125 335 69 536 195
PPD 5 234 28 752 170
125 160 29 917 131
4-Cl-OPD 5 358 28 2080 252
125 312 71 1251 255
4-Cl-MPD 5 371 48 880 60
125 275 60 1045 71
4,5-Cl2-OPD 5 307 62 1082 21
125 280 62 862 165
*

The number of revertant colonies caused by irradiation alone is about 500. Therefore, a number of >1000 of revertant colonies (bold faced) is scored as photomutagenic.

Photocytotoxicity in human skin keratinocyte cells

All six compounds were examined for possible cytotoxicity in human skin keratinocytes. The cells in culture were exposed to 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 µM of a PD derivative either with or without light irradiation. The viable cells were determined using MTT assay after the treatment. Without light irradiation, all six compounds, except 4,5-Cl2-OPD which is only soluble up to 100 µM, are not toxic to the keratinocytes up to 1000 µM (Figure 3 top). With light irradiation, four of the five compounds caused decrease in cell viability at 1000 µM. The decrease from three of the compounds are significant with P<0.05. Due to the large standard deviation, the decrease for 4-Cl-MPD is not significant at P<0.05. Only MPD did not cause a decrease in cell viability. Due to solubility problems, 4,5-Cl2-OPD was only examined up to 100 µM and there was no phototoxicity (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Top: HaCaT cell viability after exposure to phenylenediamines without light irradiation. Bottom: HaCaT cell viability after exposure to phenylenediamines with light irradiation. *These are statistically significant (P<0.05).

DNA Single Strand Cleavage caused by exposure to light and a chemical

In order to understand why some of the PDs are photomutagenic, DNA single strand cleavage was carried out using ΦX174 plasmid DNA. As seen in Figure 4, the ΦX174 DNA has two forms, supercoiled (sc-DNA) and open circular (oc-DNA). It is known that if a single strand cleavage occurred, the sc-DNA will convert to oc-DNA. On the left panel of Figure 4, the four controls, C1–C4, all yielded about the same amount of oc-DNA (20%) and sc-DNA (80%). This means either exposure to 4-Cl-OPD alone (C1) or light irradiation alone (C3) does not cause DNA cleavage. Starting in lane 5 when 4-Cl-OPD is introduced with increasing concentrations from 5–50 µM, the amount of sc-DNA decreased and the oc-DNA increased, indicating that concurrent exposure to 4-Cl-OPD and light irradiation caused DNA single strand cleavage. The similar pattern is seen for 4-Cl-MPD at a higher concentration (Figure 4 right). When the percent of DNA cleavage versus 4-Cl-OPD concentration is plotted, the concentration (C25) at which 25% of DNA cleavage is determined. These values are listed in Table 2. As can be seen, all three chlorine substituted compounds can cause DNA single strand cleavage with 4-Cl-OPD being the strongest. The three non-chlorinated compounds do not cause significant amount of DNA cleavage up to 1000µM.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

DNA (ΦX174) single strand cleavage caused by exposure to light and 4-Cl-1,2-phenylenediamine (4-Cl-OPD) or 4-Chloro-1,3-phenylenediamine (4-Cl-MPD). Controls: C1: 27 µM DNA alone; C2: DNA + 50 µM 4-Cl-OPD; C3: DNA + Light; C4: DNA + Light.

Table 2.

DNA cleavage caused by exposure to light and a selected chemical (C25 is the concentration of a chemical needed to cause 25% DNA cleavage)

C25 (µM)
OPD ND*
MPD ND*
PPD ND*
4-Cl-OPD 9.4
4-Cl-MPD 213
4,5-Cl2-OPD 325
*

ND means that C25 is greater than 1000 µM.

Discussion

Some of the PDs are toxic and mutagenic (Amo et al., 1988; Callender, 1987; Chen et al., 2006; Imaida et al., 1983; Kogevinas et al., 2006; Murata et al., 2006; Nagata et al., 1999; Nishi and Nishioka, 1982; Nohynek et al., 2004), but no report has appeared to test if they are also photomutagenic/phototoxic. It is inevitable that persons getting their hair dyed or working in this industry are contaminated with the PDs on their skin and exposed to sunlight. It is known that hair dyes can penetrate into the skin (Grams et al., 2003). Once in the skin, the combination of light irradiation and contamination of this class of chemicals may cause adverse effects to human health. In this report, our data indicate that the three chlorinated PDs are all photomutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA 102, while the three non-chlorinated PDs are not. At the same time, the three chlorinated PDs can cause light-induced DNA single strand cleavage, while the non-chlorinated PDs cannot. Phototoxicity or photomutagenicity are usually due to the formation of reactive species such as reactive oxygen species, free radicals, and reactive intermediate products (Yu, 2002). Therefore, it is clear that the chlorine substitution of PDs can produce reactive species different from the non-chlorinated PDs. However, we have not been able to identify these species that can cause DNA cleavage and mutation. Another possibility is the formation of more photomutagenic products due to photo-irradiation. It is known that irradiation of OPD or 4-Cl-OPD in an aqueous solution produces 2,3-diaminophenazine or 2,3-diamino-7-chlorophenazine, respectively (Fu et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008). These phenazine photoproducts can cause DNA cleavage and toxicity (Fu et al., 2005; Wagner et al., 1996; Watanabe et al., 1989).

As for photocytotoxicity in the skin cells, two of the three chlorinated PDs (4-Cl-OPD and 4-Cl-MPD) and two of the three non-chlorinated PDs (OPD and PPD) are cytotoxic at a very high concentration (1000 µM), while we were not able to test 4,5-Cl2-OPD at this concentration since it is not soluble enough to be tested. Only MPD is not photocytotoxic to skin keratinocytes. It is worth noting that OPD and PPD are cytotoxic in skin cells, but not mutagenic in bacteria or cause DNA cleavage.

In conclusion, cares must be taken for the use of chlorinated PDs in hair dyes. Non-chlorinated PDs are less phototoxic. People using or working with hair dyes containing chlorinated PDs must be aware of the phototoxic including photomutagenic potential of these chemicals. Whenever possible, sunlight exposure should be avoided after applying dyes containing chlorinated PDs.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was in part supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH-SCORE S06 GM08047). We thank NIH-RCMI for Core Molecular and Cellular Biology and Analytical Chemistry facilities established at JSU. Charity Mosley would like to thank the U.S. Department of Education for funding (Title III Grant P031B040101).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Altekruse SF, Henley SJ, Thun MJ. Death from hematopoietic and other cancers in relation in permanent hair dye use in a large prospective study. Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10:617–625. doi: 10.1023/a:1008926027805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames BN, Kammen HO, Yamasaki E. Hair dyes are mutagenic: Identification of a variety of mutagenic ingredients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A) 1975;72(6):2423–2427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amo H, Matsuyama M, Amano H, Yamada H, Kawai M, Miyata N, Nakadate M. Carcinogenicity and toxicity study of m-phenylenediamine administered in the drinking-water to (C57B2/6* C3H/He)F1 mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1988;26:893–897. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(88)90086-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson JS. The chemistry of hair colorants. Colorant Tech. 2000;116:193–196. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arfsten DP, Schaeffer DJ, Mulveny DC. The effects of near ultraviolet radiation on the toxic effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in animals and plants: a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety. 1996;33:1–24. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1996.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boukamp P, Petrussevska RT, Breitkreutz D, Hornung J, Markham A, Fusenig NE. Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line. J. Cell Biol. 1988;106:761–767. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.3.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burnett C, Fuchs C, Corbett J, Menkart J. The effect of dimethylsulfoxide on the mutagenicity of hair dye p-phenylenediamine. Mutat. Res. 1982;103:1–4. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(82)90077-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Callender J. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of permanent hair dyes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1987;25:419. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen S-C, Chen C-H, Chern C-L, Hsu L-S, Huang Y-C, Chung K-T, Chye S-M. p-Phenylenediamine induces p53-mediated apoptosis in Mardin-Darby canine kidney cells. Toxicol. in Vitro. 2006;20:801–807. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corbett JF. An historical review of the use of dye precursors in the formulation of commercial oxidation hair dyes. Dyes Pigments. 1999;41:127–136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong S, Hwang H-M, Harrison C, Holloway L, Shi X, Yu H. UVA light-induced DNA cleavage by selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000;64:467–474. doi: 10.1007/s001280000027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong S, Hwang H-M, Shi X, Holloway L, Yu H. UVA-induced DNA single strand cleavage by 1-hydroxypyrene and formation of covalent adducts between DNA and 1-hydroxypyrene. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2000;13:585–593. doi: 10.1021/tx990199x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu PK-L, Abuzakhm S, Turro C. Photoinduced DNA cleavage and cellular damage in human dermal fibroblasts by 2,3-diaminophenazine. Photochem. Photobiol. 2005;81:89–95. doi: 10.1562/2004-07-20-RA-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE, Yuan JM, Yu MC, Ross RK. Use of permanent hair dyes and bladder cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer. 2001;91:575–579. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::aid-ijc1092>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gago-Dominguez M, Hell DA, Walson MA, Jian-Min Y, Castelao JE, Hein DW, Chan KK, Coetzee GA, Ross RK, Yu MC. Permanent hair dyes and bladder cancer: risk modificaiton by cytochrome P450A2 and N-Acelyltransferase 1 and 2. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24(3):483–489. doi: 10.1093/carcin/24.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grams YY, Alaruikka S, Lashley L, Caussin J, Whitehead L, Bouwstra JA. Permeant lipophilicity and vehicle composition influence accumulation of dyes in hair follicles of human skin. Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2003;18:329–336. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0987(03)00035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Green A, Willet WC, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Bain C, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Use of permanent hair dyes and risk of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1987;79(2):253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guthrie JT, Kazlauciunas A, Rongong L, Rush S. The characterisation of treated and dyed hair. Dyes Pigments. 1995;29:23–44. [Google Scholar]
  19. Helzlsouer K, Rollison D, Pinney S. Association between hair dye use and health outcomes: Review of the literature published since 1992. Expert report submitted to the US Cosmetic Ingredient Review. J. Am. College Toxicol. 2003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Henley SJ, Thun MJ. Use of permanent hair dyes and bladder cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer. 2001;94:903–904. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang Y-C, Hung W-C, Kang W-Y, Chen W-T, Chai C-Y. p-Phenylenediamine induced DNA damage in SV-40 immortalized human uroepithelial cells and expression of mutant p53 and COX-2 proteins. Toxicol. Lett. 2007;170:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hueber-Becker F, Nohynek GJ, Dufour EK, Meuling WJA, de Bie ATHJ, Toutain H, Bolt HM. Occupational exposure of hairdressers to [14C]-para-phenylenediamine-containing oxidative hair dyes: A mass balance study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007;45:160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Imaida K, Ishihara Y, Nishio O, Nakanishi K, Ito N. Carcinogenicity and toxicity tests on PPD in F344 rats. Toxicol. Lett. 1983;16:259–269. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(83)90186-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kogevinas M, Fernandez F, Garcia-Closas M, Tardon A, Garcia-Closas R, Serra C, Carrato A, Castano-Vinyals G, Yeager M, Chanock SJ, Lloreta J, Rothman N, Real FX, Dosemeci M, Malats N, Silverman D. Hair dye use is not associated with risk for bladder cancer: Evidence from a case-control study in Spain. Eur. J. Cancer. 2006;42:1448–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levin DE, Hollstein M, Christman MF, Schwiers EA, Ames BN. A new Salmonella tester strain (TA102) with A·T base pairs at the site of mutation detects oxidative mutagens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1982;79:7445–7449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Levin DE, Marnett LJ, Ames BN. Spontaneous and mutagen-induced deletions: Mechanistic studies in Salmonella tester strain TA102. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1984;81:4457–4461. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maron DM, Ames BN. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res. 1983;113:173–215. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mederos A, Domínguez S, Hernández-Molina R, Sanchiz J, Brito F. Coordinating ability of ligands derived from phenylenediamines. Coord. Chem. Revs. 1999;193–195:857–911. [Google Scholar]
  29. Murata M, Nishimura T, Chen F, Kawanishi S. Oxidative DNA damage induced by hair dye components ortho-phenylenediamines and the enhancement by superoxide dismutase. Mutat. Res. 2006;607:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nagata C, Shimizu H, Hirashimas K, Kakishita E, Fujimura K, Niho Y, Karasawa M, Oguma S, Yoshida Y, Mizoguchi H. Hair dye use and occupational exposure to organic solvents as risk factors for myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia Res. 1999;23:57–62. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(98)00135-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. NCI. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health; 4-Chloro-o-phenylenediamine for possible carcinogenicity. 1978
  32. Nishi K, Nishioka H. Light induces mutagenicity of hair-dye PPD. Mutat. Res. Lett. 1982;104:347–350. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(82)90167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nohynek GJ, Fautz R, Benech-Kieffer F, Toutain H. Toxicity and human health risk of hair dyes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2004;42:517–543. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sardas S, Aygun N, Karakaya AE. Genotoxicity studies on professional hair colorists exposed to oxidation hair dyes. Mut. Res. 1997;394:153–161. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(97)00135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Staedtler F, Crespo-Perez J, Sagelsdorff P, Steiner S, Suter W. 4-Chloro-o-phenylenediamine induces a dose-related increase in G:C>T:A transversions and one major DNA adduct in the liver of Big BlueR mice after 26 weeks in feed treament. Mutat. Res. 1999;430:121–130. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00185-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Suter W, Staedtler F, Poetter-Locher F, Swingler T, Wilson L. 4-Chloro-o-phenylenediamine: a 26-week oral (in feed) mutagenicity study in Big Blue™ mice. Mutat. Res. 1998;414:149–156. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(98)00050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wagner ED, Cebulska-Wasilewska A, Connolly S, Plewa MJ. Mutagenic analysis of 2,3-diaminophenazine and 2-amino-3-hydroxyphenazine in Salmonella strains expressing different levels of O-acetyltransferase with and without plant mammalian activation. Mutat. Res. 1996;372:65–74. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00163-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang L, Yan J, Fu PP, Parekh KA, Yu H. Photomutagenicity of cosmetic ingredient chemicals azulene and guaiazulene. Mutat. Res. 2003;530:19–26. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(03)00131-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang L, Yan J, Hardy W, Mosley C, Wang S, Yu H. Light-induced mutagenicity in Salmonella TA102 and genotoxicity/cytotoxicity in human T-cells by 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine: A chemical used in the manufacture of dyes and pigments in tattoo inks. Toxicology. 2005;207:411–418. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang S, Mosley C, Stewart G, Yu H. Photochemical reaction of a dye precursor 4-chloro-1,2-phenylenediamine and its associated mutagenic effects. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2008;197:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang S, Sheng YH, Feng M, Leszczynski J, Wang L, Tachikawa H, Yu H. Light-induced cytotoxicity of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the US EPA Priority Pollutant List in human skin HaCaT keratinocytes: Relationship between phototoxicity and excited state properties. Environ. Toxicol. 2007;22:318–327. doi: 10.1002/tox.20241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Watanabe T, Hirayama T, Fukui S. Phenazine derivatives as the mutagenic reaction product from o- or m-phenylenediamine derivatives with hydrogen peroxide. Mutat. Res. 1989;227:135–145. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(89)90037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Willis L. Final report on the safety assessment of 2-chloro-p-phenylenediamine and 2-chloro-p-phenylenediamine sulfate. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1992;11:521–530. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yan J, Wang L, Fu PP, Yu H. Photomutagenicity of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the US EPA priority pollutant list. Mutat. Res. 2004;557:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu H. Environmental carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: photochemistry and phototoxicity. J. Environ. Sci. Health C: Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxic. Rev. 2002;20:149–183. doi: 10.1081/GNC-120016203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES