Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nucl Med Biol. 2009 Jan;36(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.10.010

Synthesis and Biodistribution of Lipophilic Monocationic Gallium Radiopharmaceuticals Derived from N,N′-bis(3-aminopropyl)-N,N-dimethylethylenediamine: Potential Agents for PET Myocardial Imaging with 68Ga

Yui-May Hsiao 1, Carla J Mathias 1, Shiaw-Pyng Wey 1, Phillip E Fanwick 1, Mark A Green 1
PMCID: PMC2655349  NIHMSID: NIHMS95779  PMID: 19181267

Abstract

Introduction

In locations that lack nearby cyclotron facilities for radionuclide production, generator-based 68Ga-radiopharmaceuticals might have clinical utility for positron emission tomography (PET) studies of myocardial perfusion and other physiologic processes.

Methods

The lipophilic, monocationic 67Ga-labeled gallium chelates of five novel hexadentate bis(salicylaldimine) ligands, the bis(salicylaldimine), bis(3-methoxysalicylaldimine), bis(4-methoxysalicylaldimine), bis(6-methoxysalicylaldimine), and bis(4,6-dimethoxysalicylaldimine) of N,N′-bis(3-aminopropyl)-N,N-dimethylethylenediamine (BAPDMEN), were prepared. The structure of the unlabeled [Ga(4-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]+PF6 salt was determined by X-ray crystallography, and the biodistribution of each of the 67Ga-labeled gallium chelates determined in rats following i.v. administration and compared to the biodistribution of [86Rb]rubidium chloride.

Results

The [Ga(4-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]+PF6 complex exhibits the expected pseudo-octahedral N4O22− coordination sphere about the Ga3+ center with a trans-disposition of the phenolate oxygen atoms. All five of the 67Ga-radiopharmaceuticals were found to afford the desired myocardial retention of the radiogallium. The [67/68Ga][Ga(3-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]1+ radiopharmaceutical appears to have the best properties for myocardial imaging, exhibiting 2% of the injected dose in the heart at both 1-minute and 2-hours post-injection and very high heart/non-target ratios (heart/blood ratios of 7.6 ± 1.0 and 54 ± 10 at 1-min and 120-min, respectively; heart/liver ratios of 1.8 ± 0.4 and 39 ± 3 at 1-min and 120-min, respectively).

Conclusions

Most of these new agents, particularly [67/68Ga][Ga(3-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]1+, would appear superior to previously reported bis(salicyaldimines) of N,N-bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine as candidates for PET imaging of the heart with 68Ga.

Keywords: Gallium-68, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Radiopharmaceuticals, Myocardial Imaging

INTRODUCTION

The 68Ge/68Ga parent/daughter radionuclide generator is a potential source of positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals in the absence of a nearby cyclotron facility [16]. The 271-day half-life [7] of the 68Ge parent gives this generator a long shelf-life, while the 68-minute half-life [7] of the positron-emitting 68Ga daughter is adequate for radiopharmaceutical synthesis. The 68Ga half-life can potentially be exploited in PET data collections over an extended time frame, either for improving counting statistics in images of a tracer that is trapped in tissue, or for kinetic modeling with an agent exhibiting more complicated pharmacokinetics. Numerous gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals have been reported [16, 821] and some have found use in human studies [2227].

The clinical importance of myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease has motivated attempts to develop 68Ga-labeled PET agents that could substitute for the widely used 99mTc SPECT heart agents, Cardiolite® ([99mTc]Tc-sestamibi) and Myoview™ ([99mTc]Tc-tetrofosmin). However, identification of suitable lipophilic 68Ga-radipharmaceuticals for perfusion imaging has proven somewhat elusive [815]. High, and ideally complete, first-pass extraction of an agent from blood into tissue is desired, since this will assure that the distribution of tracer maps regional tissue perfusion.

We have previously investigated [810] neutral gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals with tripodal hexadentate tris(salicylaldimine) ligands, identifying some 67/68Ga-tracers capable of producing extremely high myocardial uptake and very high heart/blood ratios in the rat at 1 minute post-injection (~2.4% of the injected dose in myocardium at 1 minute with heart/blood ratios as high as 17:1) [10]. In the dog, excellent myocardial images were obtained with [68Ga]Ga[(sal)3tame-O-iso-Bu], without blood-pool subtraction, that compare favorably to blood-pool-subtracted 15O-water images [10]. Unfortunately, all of the studied neutral 68Ga-compounds of this type were found to clear rather rapidly from myocardium [810], which we believe undermines their potential clinical utility. A 68Ga radiopharmaceutical for imaging the heart with PET may be much more attractive if, following very high first-pass myocardial extraction, the radiolabel is retained in myocardium, thereby allowing use of long image acquisition periods for improved image quality.

With the goal of obtaining lipophilic gallium radiopharmaceuticals that not only exhibit high heart uptake following intravenous administration, but also afford myocardial retention of the 68Ga-radiolabel (similar to the myocardial retention observed with the lipophilic monocationic 99mTc-myocardial perfusion agents, Cardiolite® and Myoview™), we have also prepared and evaluated a series of monocationic Ga(III) complexes with hexadentate bis(salicylaldimine) ligands [1113]. The compounds studied in this regard have been bis(salicylaldimines) derived from N,N-bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine (BAPEN) that provide a N4O22− coordination sphere for the octahedral Ga3+ ion. Such chelates consistently provided the desired myocardial retention of radiogallium, but myocardial uptake was always less than 1.1% of the injected dose in the rat model [12]. A PET study with [68Ga]Ga[(4,6-MeO2sal)2BAPEN]1+ in the dog clearly delineated the heart with good heart-to-blood and heart-to-lung contrast in images similar to those observed in a 15O-water perfusion study performed immediately prior to injection of the 68Ga radiopharmaceutical [11]. Tracer retained in myocardium, as well as excreted in bile, appears to be the intact gallium radiopharmaceutical [13]. However, while the 1% tracer uptake in myocardium observed with these compounds is substantial, it remains slightly lower than the myocardial uptake of 99mTc-Sestamibi in this rat model [11].

The utility of a 68Ga-radiopharmaceutical for myocardial perfusion imaging would seemingly be improved with: (i) heart uptake in the range of 2–3% of the injected dose, suggesting very high 1st-pass myocardial extraction; (ii) prolonged myocardial retention of the extracted 68Ga radiotracer; and (iii) high heart/blood, heart/lung, and heart/liver ratios. The ability of the monocationic gallium bis(salicylaldimine) radiopharmaceuticals to provide high heart/liver contrast appears to derive largely from their susceptibility to transport by the MDR1 P-glycoprotein, which is expressed on the biliary surface of hepatocytes and can speed tracer clearance from liver to bile [2830].

We report here the synthesis and biodistribution of a related series of gallium bis(salicylaldimine) radiopharmaceuticals derived from N,N′-bis(3-aminopropyl)-N,N-dimethylethylenediamine (BAPDMEN) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

General structural formula for the hexadentate bis(salicylaldiminato) ligands derived from N,N-Bis(3-AminoPropyl)-N,N′-DiMethyl-ethylenediamine (BAPDMEN, incorporating “en” as the standard acronym for the ethylenediamine fragment). The substituents R3, R4, and R6 are either –H or –OCH3, as specified in Table 1. These ligands bind to the octahedral Ga(III) ion via the two phenolate O atoms, the two imine N atoms, and the two amine N atoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The reagents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. Gallium(III)-acetylacetonate [Ga(acac)3] was purchased from Strem Chemical Co. (Newburyport, MA). 1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker 300 MHz spectrometer. [67Ga]Gallium chloride in HCl solution was obtained from Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc. (St. Louis, MO). No-carrier-added [86Rb]rubidium chloride was purchased from DuPont/NEN Research Products (N. Billerica, MA). Radiochromatograms were analyzed with a Berthold Tracemaster 20 Automatic TLC Linear-Analyzer. Radiopharmaceutical biodistribution in rats was determined as described previously following intravenous injection (1–5 μCi or 0.037–0.185 MBq in 0.1–0.2 mL) via the femoral vein of ether-anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats [1012]. Blood was assumed to account for 7% of total body mass, and muscle to account for 42% of total body mass [31]. All animal studies were carried out in accordance with procedures approved by the Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee.

Cold Synthesis

N,N′-bis(3-aminopropyl)-N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine (BAPDMEN)

To 1.7 g (5 mmol) of KOH in 50 mL of absolute ethanol was added 10 g (11 mmol) of N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine. The mixture was refluxed under nitrogen at 70°C for 2 h, following which 60 g (22 mmol) of N-3-bromopropylphthalimide was added. This cloudy mixture was refluxed for 16 h. The hot solution was then filtered and the solvent removed by rotary evaporation to give 20 g of a yellow semisolid. Four hundred mL of 6 N HCl was slowly added to the isolated semisolid, and the mixture was refluxed for about 18 h. A clear solution was obtained, and upon cooling to 0°C, a white crystalline solid precipitated. The solution was filtered and the filtrate evaporated on a rotary evaporator to give 20 g of white solid. This solid was neutralized with NaOH solution to give two layers. The upper layer was collected and dried over NaOH. The pure product was obtained as a clear oil (2.2 g, 20% yield) by fractional vacuum distillation at 93°C (0.12 torr). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.38 (s, br, NH2, 4 H); 1.57 (quintet, CH2CH2CH2, 4 H); 2.18 (s, N-CH3, 6 H); 2.36 (t, H2N-CH2, 4 H); 2.42 (s, NCH2CH2N, 4 H); 2.68 (t, CH2-NCH3, 4 H).

H2[(sal)2BAPDMEN] (1)

The bis(salicylaldimine) of BAPDMEN was obtained by mixing a solution of salicylaldehyde (370 mg; 3.03 mmol) in 15 mL of dry methanol, with 300 mg BAPDMEN (1.45 mmol) in 15 mL of dry methanol. The mixture was refluxed for 40 min and then stirred until cooled to 25 °C. A yellow oil was obtained after the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. This yellow oil was dissolved in diethyl ether, the solution was filtered to remove unreacted salicylaldehyde, and then cooled to 0 °C for 2 days. The resultant solution was filtered and the solvent was removed by rotor evaporation and dried under vacuum to give yellow to orange oil (0.3 g, 65% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.67 (quintet, CH2CH2CH2, 4 H); 2.23 (s, CH3, 6 H); 2.43 (t, CH2-N, 4 H); 2.46 (s, NCH2CH2N, 4 H); 3.61 (t, CH2-N=, 4 H); 6.8–7.3 (m, C6H4, 8 H); 8.33 (s, CH=N, 2 H); 13.6 (s, br, OH, 2 H).

H2[(4-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN] (2)

The bis(4-methoxysalicylaldimine) of BAPDMEN was obtained by reaction of BAPDMEN (400 mg; 1.98 mmol) with 605 mg (3.98 mmol) 2-hydroxy-4-methoxy benzaldehyde in a manner analogous to 1, allowing isolation of 0.4 g (80 % yield) of 2 as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.78 (quintet, CH2CH2CH2, 4 H); 2..19 (s, CH3, 6 H); 2.37 (t, CH2-N, 4 H); 2.42 (s, NCH2CH2N, 4 H); 3.50 (t, CH2-N=, 4 H); 3.76 (s, OCH3, 6 H); 6.3–7.0 (m, C6H3, 6 H); 8.1 (s, CH=N, 2 H); 14.0 (s, br, OH, 2 H).

H2[(4,6-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN] (3)

The bis(4,6-dimethoxysalicylaldimine) of BAPDMEN was obtained by reaction of BAPDMEN (400 mg; 1.98 mmol) with 725 mg (3.96 mmol) 4,6-dimethoxysalicylaldehyde, yielding 0.45 g (85% yield) of 3. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.78 (quintet, CH2CH2CH2, 4 H); 2.19 (s, CH3, 6 H); 2.37 (t, CH2-N, 4 H); 2.42 (s, NCH2CH2N, 4 H); 3.46 (t, CH2-N=, 4 H); 3.73 (s, OCH3, 12 H); 5.3–6.0 (m, C6H2, 4 H); 8.3 (s, CH=N, 2 H); 14.1 (s, br, OH, 2 H).

H2[(3-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN] (4)

The bis(3-methoxysalicylaldimine) of BAPDMEN was obtained by reaction of BAPDMEN (100 mg; 0.5 mmol) with 151 mg (1.0 mmol) of 3-methoxysalicylaldehyde, yielding 0.38 g (80 % yield) of 4 as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.78 (quintet, CH2CH2CH2, 4 H); 2.14 (s, CH3, 6 H); 2.35 (t, CH2-N, 4 H); 2.34 (s, NCH2CH2N, 4 H); 3.54 (t, CH2-N=, 4 H); 3.81 (s, OCH3, 6 H); 6.3–7.0 (m, C6H3, 6 H); 8.23 (s, CH=N, 2 H); 13.4 (s, br, OH, 2 H).

H2[(6-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN] (5)

The bis(6-methoxysalicylaldimine) of BAPDMEN was obtained by reaction of BAPDMEN (25 mg; 0.13 mmol) with 38 mg (0.26 mmol) 6-methoxysalicylaldehyde, providing 70 mg (60 % yield) of 5 as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) 1.78 (quintet, CH2CH2CH2, 4 H); 2.22 (s, CH3, 6 H); 2.48 (t, CH2-N, 4 H); 2.49 (s, NCH2CH2N, 4 H); 3.54 (t, CH2-N=, 4 H); 3.76 (s, OCH3, 6 H); 6.0–7.0 (m, C6H3, 6 H); 8.7 (s, CH=N, 2 H); 14.0 (s, br, OH, 2 H).

[Ga(4-MeO-sal)2BAPDMEN]+PF6

To 15 mL of a methanol solution of 2 (142 mg, 0.3 mmol) was added Ga(acac)3 (110 mg, 0.3 mmol) in 15 mL of warm methanol. The mixture was refluxed for 2 hr, after which 150 mg of KPF6 in 1 mL of water was added to the hot methanol solution. A white solid precipitate was obtained on cooling to room temperature. Crystalline product was obtained by dissolving the white solid in 3 mL acetonitrile, then the solution filtered, layered with diethyl ether, and cooled to 0 °C (80% yield). The ESI fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectrum of the product shows the parent ion peak at m/e = 537.21 (expected = 537.20) for [C26H44N4O4Ga]1+.

The structure of [Ga(4-MeO-sal)2BAPDMEN]PF6 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Preliminary examination and data collection for [Ga(4-MeO-sal)2BAPDMEN]PF6 were performed with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å) on an Enraf-Nonius CAD4 computer controlled kappa axis diffractometer equipped with a graphite crystal, incident beam monochromator. Crystal data for C26H36N4O4F6PGa: a = 10.701 (1) Å, b = 13.310 (2) Å, c = 20.723 (2) Å; β = 93.27 (6)°; V = 2946.8 (8)Å3; Z = 4 in monoclinic space group P21/n; T = 293 K; calc = 1.54 g cm−3; μ = 24.75 cm−1; R(F) = 4.7%, Rw(F) = 6%. The structure was solved using the Patterson heavy-atom method which revealed the position of the Ga atom. The remaining atoms were located in succeeding difference Fourier syntheses. Hydrogen atoms were located and added to the structure factor calculations but their positions were not refined. Complete details are provided in the deposited supporting material.

[67Ga]Ga-Bis(salicylaldimine) Radiopharmaceuticals

Each of the hexadentate bis(salicylaldimine) ligands was used to prepare the corresponding [67Ga]Ga-bis(salicylaldimine) radiopharmaceutical following the general procedure described previously [11,12]. Briefly, the dilute HCl solution of 67Ga3+ (3.7 MBq; 0.1 mCi) was evaporated to dryness in a test tube while heating under a flow of N2. The radioactive 67Ga3+ was immediately redissolved in ethanol containing 0.002 wt% acetylacetone, transferred to a clean test tube, and then 1 mg of the bis(salicylaldimine) ligand (ca. 10mg/mL ethanol) added. The mixture was heated in a water bath at 70°C for 20 minutes to form the gallium(III) complex. The reaction mixture was then diluted to 5–10% ethanol with saline and filtered through a sterile 0.2 μm polytetrafluoroethylene filter before use. The radiochemical purity of the product was evaluated by thin-layer chromatography on C18-silica gel plates eluted with methanol containing 10% saline.

The octanol/water partition coefficients of the 67Ga-radiotracers were measured between 1-octanol and isotonic TRIS-buffered saline (pH 7.4). The octanol phase from the partitioning was repartitioned three times with fresh buffer to insure that trace hydrophilic 67Ga impurities did not alter the calculated P values. The reported log P values (Table 1) are the mean (± standard deviation) of the second, third and fourth (or third and fourth) (n = 4–6).

Table 1.

The bis(salicylaldiminato) ligands studied, and the lipophilicity of the corresponding 67Ga-chelates. The substituents R3, R4, and R6 are numbered as in Figure 1.

Free Ligand Acronym of Deprotonated Ligand (L) R3 R4 R6 log P [Ga-L]1+
1 [(sal)2BAPDMEN]2− H H H 1.59 ± 0.03
2 [(4-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]2− H OCH3 H 1.92 ± 0.01
3 [(4,6-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]2− H OCH3 OCH3 2.97 ± 0.04
4 [(3-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]2− OCH3 H H 1.39 ± 0.01
5 [(6-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]2− H H OCH3 2.56 ± 0.02

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cold Chemistry

A series of five hexadentate bis(salicylaldimine) ligands were prepared using the N,N′-bis(3-aminopropyl)-N,N-dimethylethylenediamine (BAPDMEN) tetraamine backbone (Figure 1 and Table 1). These differ from the N,N-bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine (“BAPEN”) ligands examined previously [1113] by the addition of methyl substituents on each of the two nitrogen atoms of the central ethylenediamine fragment. The X-ray structure of the 4,6-dimethoxysalicylaldimine derivative, [67Ga][Ga-2]1+•PF61−, (Figure 2) confirms that these ligands retain their ability to bind the nearly octahedral Ga(III) center as hexadentate ligands in which the phenolic oxygen atoms adopt a trans-geometry. The Ga-Nimine and Ga-O bond distances of 2.05 Å, and 1.93 Å, respectively, are similar to the values seen in other gallium(III) bis(salicylaldimine) chelates derived from a N,N-bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine backbone [12, 28], while the Ga-Namine distances of 2.14 Å are slightly longer than those seen in the related gallium chelates lacking the N-methyl substituents [12, 28].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ORTEP drawing illustrating the crystallographically-determined structure of the [Ga(4-MeOsal)2BAPDMEN]1+ ([Ga-2]1+) cation. Selected bond distances (Å): Ga–O(102) 1.9279(2); Ga–O(122) 1.929(2); Ga–N(1) 2.053(3); Ga–N(5) 2.139(3); Ga–N(8) 2.147(3); Ga–N(12) 2.045(3). Selected bond angles (degrees): O(102)–Ga–O(122) 179.4(1); O(102)–Ga–N(1) 88.7(1); O(102)–Ga–N(5) 92.1(1); O(102)–Ga–N(8) 87.3(1); O(102)–Ga–N(12) 90.9(1); O(122)–Ga–N(1) 91.7(1); O(122)–Ga–N(5) 88.4(1); O(122)–Ga–N(8) 92.4(1); O(122)–Ga–N(12) 88.5(1); N(1)–Ga–N(5) 86.1(1); N(1)–Ga–N(8) 169.6(1); N(1)–Ga–N(12) 102.8(1); N(5)–Ga–N(8) 84.4(1); N(5)–Ga–N(12) 170.6(1); N(8)–Ga–N(12) 86.9(1). (Numbers in parentheses are estimated standard deviations in the least significant digits.)

Radiochemistry

While it is ultimately 68Ga that is of the greatest interest as a radiopharmaceutical label, 67Ga was employed as a surrogate in the present studies due to the experimental convenience offered by its longer physical half-life. The 67Ga-labeled gallium chelates of the five new salicylaldimine ligands (Figure 1 and Table 1) were obtained with >93% radiochemical purity and were used without further purification. Each bis(salicylaldimine) radiopharmaceutical migrated as single radioactive peak with Rf values in the range 0.3–0.6 on C18-plates developed with methanol containing 10% saline, conditions under which the [67Ga]Ga(acac)3 precursor remains at the origin (Rf = 0).

The lipophilicity of the five BAPDMEN chelates of 67Ga, assessed via their octanol/water partition coefficients, spanned log P values from 1.4 to 3.0 (Table 1), which is the range where optimum myocardial uptake was observed in previous studies of gallium bis(salicylaldimine) chelates derived from the BAPEN tetraamine backbone [12]. For the salicylaldimine, 4-methoxysalicylaldimine, and 4,6-dimethoxysalicylaldimine chelates of the BAPDMEN backbone, where the corresponding BAPEN derivatives were previously studied, it was found that each additional N-methyl substituent of the BAPDMEN backbone (i.e., methyl groups replacing the amino N-H of the BAPEN ligands) increases log P by approximately 0.4. This is in keeping with the substituent effect one would predict from the work of Hansch on the variation of octanol/water partition coefficients in simple organic molecules bearing aliphatic amine substituents [32, 33].

Biodistribution of 67Ga-chelates vs. 86RbCl

The biodistribution of each of the 67Ga-chelates was determined in rats at 1-minute and 2-hours following intravenous injection (Tables 26). For reference, the biodistribution of 86Rb+ was similarly evaluated (Table 7), since the aqueous 82Rb+ cation is an FDA-approved agent for PET assessment of myocardial perfusion [34, 35]. The data shown is expressed as a percentage of the injected dose per organ, allowing direct assessment of total delivery to the heart and other major organs. The corresponding values for the percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue (wet mass) are provided for reference in the electronic “Supporting Data.” The tracers are all rapidly cleared from blood following intravenous administration (Tables 27).

Table 2.

Biodistribution of [67Ga][Ga-1]1+ in Rats

Percentage of Injected Dose per Organ*
Organ 1 min 120 min
Blood 4.97 ± 0.11 0.99 ± 0.11
Heart 1.68 ± 0.06 1.81 ± 0.12
Lungs 1.44 ± 0.17 1.15 ± 0.11
Liver 16.9 ± 1.10 1.67 ± 0.26
Spleen 0.39 ± 0.07 0.37 ± 0.09
Kidney (1) 7.90 ± 0.14 2.38 ± 0.14
Brain 0.045 ± 0.001 0.030 ± 0.002
Muscle 6.73 ± 0.63 8.44 ± 1.97
*

Values shown are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) of data from male rats, 158–172 g.

Table 6.

Biodistribution of [67Ga][Ga-5]1+ in Rats

Percentage of Injected Dose per Organ*
Organ 1 min 120 min
Blood 15.0 ± 1.0 0.69 ± 0.07
Heart 1.43 ± 0.05 1.36 ± 0.02
Lungs 2.7 ± 0.2 0.96 ± 0.14
Liver 20 ± 4 2.2 ± 0.4
Spleen 0.57 ± 0.13 0.72 ± 0.13
Kidney (1) 7.57 ± 0.63 5.34 ± 0.72
Brain 0.09 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01
Muscle 8.6 ± 1.5 7.4 ± 1.6
*

Values shown are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) of data from male rats, 161–185 g.

Table 7.

Biodistribution of [86Rb]RbCl in Rats

Organ Percentage of Injected Dose per Organ*
1 min 120 min
Blood 3.61 ± 0.28 1.43 ± 0.08
Heart 2.86 ± 0.38 0.69 ± 0.02
Lungs 2.0 ± 0.3 1.11 ± 0.01
Liver 5.4 ± 0.8 14 ± 1
Spleen 0.32 ± 0.08 0.71 ± 0.13
Kidney (1) 6.7 ± 1.1 1.01 ± 0.04
Brain 0.08 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.01
Muscle 17 ± 4 42 ± 2
*

Values shown are the mean ± standard deviation of data from male rats, 153–176 g; n = 7 at 1 minute, n = 3 at 120 minutes.

All of these lipophilic monocationic 67Ga-agents afford significant myocardial uptake, and retention, of the radiolabel. With the exception of the most lipophilic, the 4,6-dimethoxy chelate [67Ga][Ga-3]1+, the new 67Ga agents all provide higher myocardial uptake than observed with the structurally analogous radiopharmaceuticals derived from the BAPEN tetraamine backbone [11, 12], with myocardial uptake of the 3-methoxy- derivative, [67Ga][Ga-4]1+, reaching 2% of the injected dose (Table 5). The latter level of myocardial uptake exceeds that which we have previously reported for the 99mTc myocardial perfusion tracer Cardiolite® (99mTc-sestamibi) in the rat model [11], but remains below the maximum myocardial uptake observed with 86Rb+ (Table 7) and the neutral [67/68Ga]gallium tris(salicylaldimine) chelates [10]. Nevertheless, the myocardial retention of the [67/68Ga][Ga-4]1+ radiopharmaceutical would make this the more attractive candidate for clinical use in PET myocardial imaging, since extended image acquisition periods could be used to improve counting statistics.

Table 5.

Biodistribution of [67Ga][Ga-4]1+ in Rats

Percentage of Injected Dose per Organ*
Organ 1 min 120 min
Blood 5.3 ± 0.6 0.70 ± 0.11
Heart 2.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1
Lungs 1.8 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.1
Liver 13 ± 2 0.56 ± 0.03
Spleen 0.45 ± 0.03 0.24 ± 0.05
Kidney (1) 7.5 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 0.24
Brain 0.057 ± 0.004 0.030 ± 0.002
Muscle 6.3 ± 0.3 7.8 ± 1.6
*

Values shown are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) of data from male rats, 152–173 g.

High myocardial uptake and retention are not the sole determinants of the quality expected in PET myocardial images — one also needs high heart/blood, heart/lung, and heart/liver contrast. Heart/blood and heart/lung contrast are observed to vary among the five new 67Ga-radiopharmaceuticals studied (Table 8), but for at least the salicylaldimine ([67Ga][Ga-1]1+), 4-methoxysalicylaldimine ([67Ga][Ga-2]1+), and 3-methoxysalicylaldimine ([67Ga][Ga-4]1+) tracers, would appear quite adequate for myocardial imaging using PET and 68Ga. There is also considerable variation in the level of heart/liver contrast (Table 8 and Figure 3), with the 3-methoxy complex, [67Ga][Ga-4]1+, providing outstanding heart/liver contrast due to its extremely efficient clearance from liver into bile. The rapid hepatobiliary clearance of [67Ga][Ga-4]1+ is presumed to indicate this agent to be the most effectively transported by the MDR1 P-glycoprotein of hepatocytes, and is consistent with our prior finding that 3-methoxy- and 3-ethoxy-substituted Ga-chelates appeared to be the best MDR1 Pgp-transport substrates obtained using the bis(2,2-dimethyl-3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine (Me4BAPEN) ligand backbone [28].

Table 8.

Myocardium-to-Non-target Tissue Ratios in Rats, Based on Radiotracer Biodistribution Calculated as a Percentage of the Injected Dose per Gram Tissue Wet Mass.

Heart/Blood
Heart/Lung
Heart/Liver
Radiopharmaceutical 1 min 2 hrs 1 min 2 hrs 1 min 2 hrs

[67Ga][Ga-1]1+ 6.5 ± 0.3 33.8 ± 4.9 2.13 ± 0.12 2.8 ± 0.4 1.13 ± 0.09 10.9 ± 2.2
[67Ga][Ga-2]1+ 4.0 ± 0.4 23.3 ± 2.7 1.97 ± 0.29 2.6 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.8
[67Ga][Ga-3]1+ 0.68 ± 0.08 6.4 ± 1.3 0.58 ± 0.04 1.58 ± 0.08 0.33 ± 0.02 2.7 ± 0.3
[67Ga][Ga-4]1+− 7.6 ± 1.0 54 ± 10 1.85 ± 0.17 2.9 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.4 39.0 ± 3.0
[67Ga][Ga-5]1+ 1.86 ± 0.08 37.9 ± 3.5 1.00 ± 0.05 2.4 ± 0.3 0.85 ± 0.22 7.2 ± 1.9
[99mTc]Tc-Sestamibi1+* 11.1 ± 0.2 208 ± 25 1.3 ± 0.2 6.5 ± 1.7 1.7 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 1.7
*

From reference 11.

Data from 60-minutes rather than 120-minutes post-injection.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Heart/Liver Ratios for the [67Ga]Ga-bis(salicylaldimine) chelates and [99mTc]Tc-Sestamibi and [86Rb]rubidium chloride reference tracers. The [99mTc]Tc-Sestamibi data shown are from reference 11.

CONCLUSIONS

The results seen with some of these new 67Ga-chelates, particularly the 3-methoxysalicylaldimine derivative, [Ga-4]1+, suggest that the corresponding 68Ga-radiopharmaceuticals could be superior to [99mTc]Tc-sestamibi as markers of myocardial perfusion. However, it must be noted that the extrapolation of such tracer performance from rodents to humans can be fraught with pitfalls, with species-dependent binding to plasma proteins potentially altering the efficiency of radiopharmaceutical delivery to myocardium [36]. Further work will be required to define whether, and how, the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of such agents varies between species.

Supplementary Material

01

Table 3.

Biodistribution of [67Ga][Ga-2]1+ in Rats

Percentage of Injected Dose per Organ*
Organ 1 min 120 min
Blood 7.80 ± 0.16 1.34 ± 0.08
Heart 1.70 ± 0.14 1.60 ± 0.17
Lungs 1.31 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.15
Liver 28.0 ± 3.40 2.60 ± 0.16
Spleen 0.44 ± 0.04 0.35 ± 0.04
Kidney (1) 7.15 ± 0.70 3.42 ± 0.42
Brain 0.05 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01
Muscle 7.49 ± 2.15 7.86 ± 2.03
*

Values shown are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) of data from male rats, 179–198 g.

Table 4.

Biodistribution of [67Ga][Ga-3]1+ in Rats

Percentage of Injected Dose per Organ*
Organ 1 min 120 min
Blood 23.0 ± 1.70 1.87 ± 0.40
Heart 0.85 ± 0.03 0.59 ± 0.03
Lungs 2.44 ± 0.22 0.71 ± 0.08
Liver 33.2 ± 1.10 2.79 ± 0.23
Spleen 0.68 ± 0.15 0.85 ± 0.30
Kidney (1) 6.13 ± 0.31 5.50 ± 0.37
Brain 0.104 ± 0.013 0.034 ± 0.006
Muscle 4.86 ± 0.79 3.91 ± 0.48
*

Values shown are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) of data from male rats, 184–196 g.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants R01-CA46909 and R01-CA092403 awarded by the U.S. Public Health Service.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Green MA, Welch MJ. Gallium Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry. Nucl Med Biol. 1989;16:435–448. doi: 10.1016/0883-2897(89)90053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Green MA. The potential for generator-based PET perfusion tracers. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1641–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Green MA. Gallium and copper radiopharmaceutical chemistry. In: Emram AM, editor. New Trends in Radiopharmaceutical Synthesis, Quality Assurance and Regulatory Control. New York: Plenum; 1991. pp. 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weiner RE, Thakur ML. Chemistry of gallium and indium radiopharmaceuticals. In: Welch MJ, Redvanly C, editors. Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals. New York: Wiley; 2003. pp. 363–399. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.AL-Nahhas A, Win Z, Szyszko T, Singh A, Khan S, Rubello D. What can gallium-68 PET add to receptor and molecular imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2007;34:1897–1901. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0568-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Breeman WAP, Verbruggen AM. The 68Ge/68Ga generator has high potential, but when can we use68Ga-labelled tracers in clinical routine? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2007;34:978–981. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0387-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lederer CM, Shirley VS, editors. Table of Isotopes. 7. New York: Wiley; 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Green MA, Welch MJ, Mathias CJ, Fox KAA, Knabb RM, Huffman JC. Gallium-68 1,1,1-tris(5-methoxysalicylaldiminomethyl)ethane: a potential tracer for evaluation of regional myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:170–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Green MA. Synthesis and biodistribution of a series of lipophilic gallium-67 tris(salicylaldimine) complexes. J Labelled Compds Radiopharm. 1986;23:1227–1229. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Green MA, Mathias CJ, Neumann WL, Fanwick PE, Janik M, Deutsch EA. Potential gallium-68 tracers for imaging the heart with PET: Evaluation of four gallium complexes with fucntionalized tripodal tris(salicylaldimine) ligands. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:228–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsang BW, Mathias CJ, Green MA. A gallium-68 radiopharmaceutical that is retained in myocardium: 68Ga[(4,6-(MeO)2sal)2BAPEN]+ J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1127 – 1131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tsang BW, Mathias CJ, Fanwick PE, Green MA. Structure-distribution relationships for metal-labeled myocardial imaging agents: comparison of a series of cationic gallium(III) complexes with hexadentate bis(salicylaldimine) ligands. J Med Chem. 1994;37:4400–4406. doi: 10.1021/jm00051a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsang BW, Mathias CJ, Green MA. Structure-activity relationships for cationic Ga(III) bis(salicylaldimine) radiopharmaceuticals that are retained in myocardium. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:79P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kung HF, Liu BL, Mankoff D, Kung MP, Billings JJ, Francesconi L, et al. A new myocardial imaging agent: synthesis, characterization, and biodistribution of gallium-68-BAT-TECH. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1635–1640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Plössl K, Chandra R, Qu W, Lieberman BP, Kung MP, Zhou R, et al. A novel gallium bisaminothiolate complex as a myocardial perfusion imaging agent. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moerlein SM, Daugherty A, Sobel BE, Welch MJ. Metabolic imaging with gallium-68- and indium-111-labeled low-density lipoprotein. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:300–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Klivényi G, Schuhmacher J, Patzelt E, Hauser H, Matys R, Moock M, et al. Gallium-68 chelate imaging of human colon carcinoma xenografts pretargeted with bispecific anti-CD44V6/anti-gallium chelate antibodies. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1769–1776. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoffend J, Mier W, Schuhmacher J, Schmidt K, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss L, et al. Gallium-68-DOTA-albumin as a PET blood-pool marker: experimental evaluation in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32 :287 – 292. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith-Jones PM, Stolz B, Bruns C, Albert R, Reist HW, Fridrich R, et al. Gallium-67/Gallium-68-[DFO]-Octreotide—A potential radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors: synthesis and radiolabeling in vitro and preliminary in vivo studies. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:317–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Griffiths GL, Chang CH, McBride WJ, Rossi EA, Sheerin A, Tejada GR, et al. Reagents and methods for PET using bispecific antibody pretargeting and 68Ga-radiolabeled bivalent hapten-peptide-chelate conjugates. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:30–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jeong JM, Hong MK, Chang YS, Lee YS, Kim YJ, Cheon GJ, et al. Preparation of a promising angiogenesis PET imaging agent: 68Ga-labeled c(RGDyK)–isothiocyanatobenzyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid and feasibility studies in mice. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:830–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hawkins RA, Phelps ME, Huang SC, Wapenski SA, Grimm PD, Parker RG, et al. A kinetic evaluation of blood-brain barrier permeability in human brain tumors with 68Ga-EDTA and PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1984;4:507–515. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1984.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Calandrino FS, Anderson DJ, Mintun MA, Schuster DP. Pulmonary vascular permeability during the adult respiratory distress syndrome: a positron emission tomography study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138:421–8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.2.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mintun MA, Dennis DR, Welch MJ, Mathias CJ, Schuster DP. Measurements of pulmonary vascular permeability with PET and gallium-68 transferrin. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:1704–1716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Hipp P, Kowalski J, Becker DW, Doll J, et al. PET imaging of somatostatin receptors ssing [68GA]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1053–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Mäcke HR, Eisenhut M, et al. Exceptional increase in somatostatin receptor expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour, visualised with (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2004;31:466. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1436-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hohenberger P, Haberkorn U, Mäcke HR, Eisenhut M, Strauss LG. 68Ga-labeled bombesin studies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1245–1250. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharma VJ, Beatty A, Wey S-P, Dahlheimer J, Pica CM, Crankshaw CL, et al. Novel gallium(III) complexes transported by MDR1 P-glycoprotein: potential PET imaging agents for probing P-glycoprotein-mediated transport activity in vivo. Chem Biol. 2000;7:335–343. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(00)00111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sharma V, Crankshaw CL, Piwnica-Worms D. Effects of multidrug resistance (MDR1) P-glycoprotein expression levels and coordination metal on the cytotoxic potency of multidentate (N4O2) (ethylenediamine)bis[propyl(R-benzylimino)]metal(III) cations. J Med Chem. 1996;39:3483–3490. doi: 10.1021/jm950823c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sharma V, Prior JL, Belinsky MG, Kruh GD, Piwnica-Worms D. Characterization of a 67Ga/68Ga radiopharmaceutical for SPECT and PET of MDR1 P-glycoprotein transport activity in vivo: validation in multidrug-resistant tumors and at the blood-brain barrier. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:354–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Donaldson HH. The Rat. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute; 1915. p. 75. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Iwasa J, Fujita T, Hansch C. Substituent constants for aliphatic functions obtained from partition coefficients. J Med Chem. 1965;8:150–3. doi: 10.1021/jm00326a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Leo A, Hansch C, Elkins D. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem Rev. 1971;71:525 – 616. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schwaiger M. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:693–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Merhige ME, Breen WJ, Shelton V, Houston T, D’Arcy BJ, Perna AF. Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and 82Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1069–1076. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deutsch E, Ketring AR, Libson K, Vanderheyden J, Hirth WW. The Noah’s Ark experiment: species dependent biodistributions of cationic 99mTc complexes. Nucl Med Biol. 1989;16:191–232. doi: 10.1016/0883-2897(89)90003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES