Abstract
Levofloxacin disk susceptibility test criteria were evaluated by testing 350 bacterial isolates. Either 5- or 10-micrograms disks could be used satisfactorily. A 5-micrograms levofloxacin disk with zone size breakpoints of < or = 12 mm for resistance (MIC, > or = 8.0 micrograms/ml) and > or = 16 mm for susceptibility (MIC, < or = 2.0 micrograms/ml) is recommended.
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barry A. L., Jones R. N. Temafloxacin disk potency and tentative interpretive criteria for susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Dec;27(12):2861–2863. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.12.2861-2863.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cherubin C. E., Eng R. H., Smith S. M., Tan E. N. A comparison of antimicrobial activity of ofloxacin, L-ofloxacin, and other oral agents for respiratory pathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Feb;15(2):141–144. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90038-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foleno B., Fu K. P. In vitro activity of l-ofloxacin against norfloxacin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;15(6):557–559. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu K. P., Lafredo S. C., Foleno B., Isaacson D. M., Barrett J. F., Tobia A. J., Rosenthale M. E. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of levofloxacin (l-ofloxacin), an optically active ofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Apr;36(4):860–866. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.4.860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs P. C., Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C. Proposed disk diffusion susceptibility criteria for ofloxacin. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):310–311. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.310-311.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs P. C., Jones R. N., Barry A. L., Gavan T. L. Ofloxacin susceptibility testing quality control parameters for microdilution and disk diffusion, and confirmation of disk diffusion interpretive criteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jan;27(1):49–52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.1.49-52.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lode H., Höffken G., Olschewski P., Sievers B., Kirch A., Borner K., Koeppe P. Pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin after parenteral and oral administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1338–1342. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Metzler C. M., DeHaan R. M. Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations. J Infect Dis. 1974 Dec;130(6):588–594. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.6.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu H. C., Chin N. X. In vitro activity of S-ofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Jul;33(7):1105–1107. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.7.1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okazaki O., Kojima C., Hakusui H., Nakashima M. Enantioselective disposition of ofloxacin in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Oct;35(10):2106–2109. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.10.2106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Une T., Fujimoto T., Sato K., Osada Y. In vitro activity of DR-3355, an optically active ofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Sep;32(9):1336–1340. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.9.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
