Abstract
Fifteen clinical isolates of Fusobacterium species were studied to determine their quality of growth on five agar media, their susceptibility to penicillin, cephalothin, cefoxitin, and cefotaxime, the inoculum effect, and the presence of L forms and beta-lactamase. Wilkins-Chalgren agar supported confluent growth best, but Fusobacterium nucleatum exhibited poor growth on all agar media. Most isolates exhibited poor reproducibility of MIC results with repeated agar dilution testing. However, most isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics at the breakpoint concentrations. No inoculum effect was observed, but preparation of an inoculum at a 0.5 McFarland nephelometric standard produced a lower than expected number of CFU (10(6) CFU) in some isolates. L forms were frequently seen. No beta-lactamase was found. The variability in MICs seen with beta-lactam antibiotics was not found when clindamycin was tested. MIC studies with Fusobacterium spp. may be complicated by poor growth on agar media, poor reproducibility, and small inoculum size.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72ea9/72ea932bbf29650b56510a2fed62b5a8d1ed56c8" alt="476"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/209f6/209f61cb1b653ff4fe0dcce8e5125e9e442d5b5a" alt="477"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f985/9f985ce688babe620cf304a8a34005bd223f1975" alt="478"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a42d1/a42d149d9da1d562339b64914cdb64da67f15794" alt="479"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bansal M. B., Chuah S. K., Thadepalli H. Susceptibility of intestinal anaerobes to new beta-lactam antibiotics. Chemotherapy. 1984;30(4):237–243. doi: 10.1159/000238274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgault A. M., Lamothe F. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1060–1064. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1060-1064.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgault A. M., Rosenblatt J. E. Characterization of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli by using rapid slide tests for beta-lactamase production. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jun;9(6):654–656. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.6.654-656.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chow A. W., Finegold S. M. In-vitro activity of ceftizoxime against anaerobic bacteria and comparison with other cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Nov;10 (Suppl 100):45–50. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_c.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Del Bene V. E., Carek P. J., Twitty J. A., Burkey L. J. In vitro activity of cefbuperazone compared with that of other new beta-lactam agents against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 May;27(5):817–820. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.5.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finegold S. M., Rolfe R. D. Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Mar;1(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gabay E. L., Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Rapid beta-lactamase testing in bacteroides. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Nov;8(5):413–416. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.5.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George W. L., Kirby B. D., Sutter V. L., Citron D. M., Finegold S. M. Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli: Their role in infection and patterns of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. II. Little-known Fusobacterium species and miscellaneous genera. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 May-Jun;3(3):599–626. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Höffler U., Pulverer G. Antibiotic sensitivity testing of anaerobic bacteria by the breakpoint method. Chemotherapy. 1984;30(6):392–397. doi: 10.1159/000238299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nord C. E., Olsson-Liljequist B. Anaerobic bacteria and beta-lactam antibiotics. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1984;42:72–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owens W. E., Finegold S. M. Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefmenoxime, cefotetan, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):626–629. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolfe R. D., Finegold S. M. Comparative in vitro activity of ceftriaxone against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Aug;22(2):338–341. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter V. L., Barry A. L., Wilkins T. D., Zabransky R. J. Collaborative evaluation of a proposed reference dilution method of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):495–502. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.4.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):736–752. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tunér K., Lindqvist L., Nord C. E. Purification and properties of a novel beta-lactamase from Fusobacterium nucleatum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Jun;27(6):943–947. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.6.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins T. D., Chalgren S. Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Dec;10(6):926–928. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.6.926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]