Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2009 Apr 2;4(4):e5101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005101

Diffusion Spectrum Imaging Shows the Structural Basis of Functional Cerebellar Circuits in the Human Cerebellum In Vivo

Cristina Granziera 1,*, Jeremy Dan Schmahmann 2, Nouchine Hadjikhani 3,4, Heiko Meyer 5, Reto Meuli 6, Van Wedeen 3, Gunnar Krueger 7
Editor: Christoph Kleinschnitz8
PMCID: PMC2659746  PMID: 19340289

Abstract

Background

The cerebellum is a complex structure that can be affected by several congenital and acquired diseases leading to alteration of its function and neuronal circuits. Identifying the structural bases of cerebellar neuronal networks in humans in vivo may provide biomarkers for diagnosis and management of cerebellar diseases.

Objectives

To define the anatomy of intrinsic and extrinsic cerebellar circuits using high-angular resolution diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI).

Methods

We acquired high-resolution structural MRI and DSI of the cerebellum in four healthy female subjects at 3T. DSI tractography based on a streamline algorithm was performed to identify the circuits connecting the cerebellar cortex with the deep cerebellar nuclei, selected brainstem nuclei, and the thalamus.

Results

Using in-vivo DSI in humans we were able to demonstrate the structure of the following cerebellar neuronal circuits: (1) connections of the inferior olivary nucleus with the cerebellar cortex, and with the deep cerebellar nuclei (2) connections between the cerebellar cortex and the deep cerebellar nuclei, (3) connections of the deep cerebellar nuclei conveyed in the superior (SCP), middle (MCP) and inferior (ICP) cerebellar peduncles, (4) complex intersections of fibers in the SCP, MCP and ICP, and (5) connections between the deep cerebellar nuclei and the red nucleus and the thalamus.

Conclusion

For the first time, we show that DSI tractography in humans in vivo is capable of revealing the structural bases of complex cerebellar networks. DSI thus appears to be a promising imaging method for characterizing anatomical disruptions that occur in cerebellar diseases, and for monitoring response to therapeutic interventions.

Introduction

The cerebellum is a complex structure that plays a major role in motor control [1] as well as in cognitive-emotional processing [2], [3]. Knowledge regarding structure of the human cerebellum is essential for understanding the functional consequences of congenital and acquired neurological diseases of the cerebellum including sporadic and hereditary ataxias, the consequences of focal lesions such as stroke, and the cerebellar component of neuropsychiatric diseases including schizophrenia, Asperger's syndrome and autism [4][8].

Investigations of the gross anatomy of the human cerebellum date back to the 18th century [9][11] and have been further elaborated upon in recent human MRI atlases [12][15]. In contrast, knowledge of intrinsic neural circuits of the cerebellum and extracerebellar connections with spinal cord, brainstem and cerebral hemispheres has been derived exclusively from tract tracing studies and physiological investigations in animals because there has been no method available for the study of these pathways and circuits in the human brain [16][22]. Recent developments in MRI technology, however, have enabled the study of the anatomical basis of cerebellar circuits in humans using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) methodology. Some advances have been made using DTI [23] but the underlying diffusion tensor model has intrinsic limitations that permit only partial visualization of cerebellar white matter tracts, and limited capability to reveal complex anatomical details of the cerebellar circuits [23].

In contrast, diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI), a high angular resolution diffusion technique [24], is able to define more complex structures such as crossing fibers. DSI has proven useful in studying the fiber tracts and connections of the human cerebrum and cerebellar systems in vitro [25], [26]. We hypothesized that DSI would yield new insights into the organization of the human cerebellum in vivo. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that the connections of the human cerebellum in vivo would reflect those identified in the experimental animal, and be consistent with findings of the limited published post mortem studies to date.

Methods

Image acquisition and DSI tractography reconstruction

Four healthy female participants (age: 26±4 yrs) underwent magnetic resonance DSI in a commercial 3T scanner (Trio a Tim System, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a 32-channel head helmet coil. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Siemens AG, Healthcare Sector, Imaging, Magnetic Resonance, Process Lifecycle Management (H IM MR PLM, Erlangen, Germany). All subjects provided written informed consent prior to the imaging session. DSI was performed using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) product sequence and the following parameters: TR/TE = 6600/138, FoV = 212 mm, 34 slices, 2.2 mm isotropic resolution, GRAPPA = 2, 258 diffusion directions covering a half q-space 3D grid with radial grid size of 5, b(max) = 8000 s/mm2 and one image acquired at b = 0 s/mm2 (referred to here as b0-image), total acquisition time = 28:44 min. DSI scans centered in the cerebellum were acquired twice and averaged subsequently. Diffusion encoding was performed using a bipolar encoding scheme to minimize distortion effects due to residual eddy-current effects introduced by the diffusion gradient pulses [27]. High and low b-value scans were interleaved to qualitatively assess subject motion. For anatomical reference a whole brain high-resolution MPRAGE was acquired using the parameters described in the ADNI protocol (http://www.loni.ucla.edu/ADNI/Research/Cores/ADNI_Siemens_3T_TrioTimVB13.pdf) (TR: 2400 ms, TE: 3.59 ms, 0.8 mm isotropic resolution, FOV256×256). DSI reconstruction was performed with Diffusion toolkit [28] using data from single DSI acquisitions and from the averaged raw images. Subsequently, DSI tractography was performed based on a FACT-like streamline algorithm [29] using the TrackVis software [28]. We seeded a path for every orientation density function (odf) max vector at every voxel, extending the path along the vector of least curvature in a new voxel, and stopping the process if this curvature ≥35°. The colour-coding of the obtained fibers is based on standard RGB code applied to the vector at every segment of each fiber. Blue indicates the rostro-caudal direction; red the medio-lateral plane; and green the dorso-ventral orientation.

Region of interest (ROIs) selection

We used the TrackVis 3-D tool to select the ROI in b0 images. The anatomical structure corresponding to the desired ROIs was initially localized in MRI atlases of the cerebellum [12], [13], subsequently identified in the MPRAGE images, and then selected in the co-registered b0 dataset. The following regions were defined as seed-point for the analysis: 1) the inferior olivary nucleus; 2) deep cerebellar nuclei; 3) ventrolateral region of thalamus; 4) red nucleus; and 5) the superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP), 6) middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), and 7) inferior cerebellar peduncle (ICP). The pathways identified by performing tractography through the ROIs were compared with known anatomical pathways as defined in human gross anatomy texts [30] and in connectional studies in experimental animals [31][33].

Results

The following pathways and connections were consistently observed and visualized in all four subjects:

1. Connections between the inferior olivary nucleus and the cerebellar cortex, and collaterals to the deep cerebellar nuclei ( figure 1 A and B-I).

Figure 1. Olivary-cerebellar cortex connections and olivary-dentate-olivary loop.

Figure 1

A) Sagittal tractography view, in a DWI image background on the left, showing the connections between (i) the Inferior olivary nucleus (green region of interest -ROI) and the cerebellar cortex (light bright green fiber trajectories) and (ii) the Inferior olivary nucleus and the Dentate nucleus (dark green fiber trajectories). The ROI in the Inferior olive is shown in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes in the images at bottom (from left to right). B), C) and D) Axial tractography view, in a DWI background, showing: B) the connections between (i) the Inferior olivary nucleus (green ROI) and the dentate nucleus (DN) through Dentate nucleus climbing fibers (DNCF) and (ii) the connections between the inferior olivary nucleus (green ROI) and the cortex through cortical climbing fibers (CCF); C) the intersection between the CCF and parallel fibers (PF) from the granule cell axons. D) PF in the cerebellar cortex. E) and F) Tractography magnification of an axial view of the cerebellar cortex, in DWI background. PF and on the left, PF intersecting CCF. G), H), I) 3D tractography view, in a DWI background, showing: G) some PF traversing the cerebellar cortex. H) PF crossing CF that are oriented perpendicular to them. I) Higher magnification of H).

We positioned a ROI in an area corresponding to the inferior olivary nucleus, situated in the rostral medulla oblongata between the pyramidal tract and the lateral reticular nucleus (green ROI, figure 1 A). Tracking from this ROI, we identified a pathway entering the cerebellum through the ICP and connecting to: 1) the dentate nucleus (light green, figure 1 A) and 2) the cerebellar cortex (dark green, figure 1 A). This pathway is consistent with the trajectory of the olivocerebellar climbing fiber system.

Figure 2. Dentate nucleus connections.

Figure 2

A) Sagittal view and B) sagittal and axial 3D view of the Dentate nucleus (DN - see yellow ROI) in a b0 background image. We show: (i) a subset of connections between DN and the cerebellar cortex (lateral hemisphere) and (ii) fibers identified by the ROI in the DN travelling in the MCP and the SCP. C) 3D localization of the Dentate Nucleus (yellow ROI) in a b0 background image in sagittal, coronal, and axial views (from left to right).

The collaterals to the dentate nucleus constitute a reciprocal loop connecting the inferior olivary nucleus with the deep cerebellar nuclei (olivary-dentate-olivary loop, figure 1 B). Fiber solutions that do not connect to the dentate nucleus reach the cerebellar cortex (olivary-cerebellar cortex connections, figure 1 B- I), crossing at right angles with fibers in the cortex that have a location and orientation consistent with parallel fibers. This intersection of fiber trajectories in the cerebellar cortex could be identified using the 3D display of the TrackVis software [28].

From the same ROI, we also visualized fiber tracts within the pyramidal tract (blue, figure 1 A), because of the close proximity of the inferior olivary nucleus and the pyramid in the medulla.

2. Connections between the cerebellar cortex and the dentate nucleus ( figure 2 A, B ), emboliform and globose nuclei ( figure 3 A, B ), and the fastigial nucleus ( figure 3 C, D ).

Figure 3. Interpositus and Fastigial nuclei connections.

Figure 3

A) Sagittal view of the region containing the Globose and Emboliform nuclei (interpositus nucleus (IN) yellow ROI), in a b0 background image. We show (i) the connections between the IN and the cerebellar cortex (intermediate cortex) and (ii) the fibers that link these deep cerebellar nuclei with the SCP. B) 3D localization of the location of the Globose and Emboliform nuclei (yellow ROI) in a b0 background image in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, from left to right. C) Sagittal view of the Fastigial nucleus (FN) (see orange ROI), in a b0 background image. We show (i) the connections between the FN and the cerebellar cortex (vermis) and (ii) the fibers that link the FN with the SCP and ICP D) 3D localization of the FN (see orange ROI) in a b0 background in bottom figures in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, from left to right.

The Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex project to those parts of the deep cerebellar nuclei that are closest to them, conforming to a zonal, parasagittal orientation [16], [17], [19], [34], [35]. Thus, the lateral hemispheres project to the dentate nucleus (figure 2 A, B); the intermediate cortex project to the globose and emboliform nuclei (figure 3 A); and the vermis projects to the fastigial nucleus (figure 3 C).

We were able to show only a subset of the fibers expected to connect the dentate nucleus with the lateral hemispheres of the cerebellar cortex, most likely a consequence of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and angular resolution limitations. Similarly, we were unable to visualize the predicted connections between the fastigial nucleus and lobules IX-X of the vermis [33].

3. Efferent projections from the deep cerebellar nuclei conveyed in the three cerebellar peduncles ( figures 2 A, B, C and 3 A–D ).

After identifying a ROI in the area corresponding to each deep nucleus (figure 2 and 3), we visualized fiber trajectories travelling in 1) the SCP and the MCP linked to the dentate nucleus (figure 2 A, B); 2) the SCP from the interpositus nucleus (figure 3 A, B); and 3) the SCP and ICP from the fastigial nucleus (figure 3 C, D). In order to better visualize the characteristic morphology of the MCP, we also obtained a 3D view showing this tract coursing around the basis pontis in the axial plane (figure 2 B).

4. Complex crossing intersections between the SCP and the ICP ( figure 4 A–C ), and the intersection between the MCP and the ICP ( figure 4 B, C, D ). We positioned 3 ROIs along the 1) SCP (upper pons, figure 4 A–D) 2) MCP (lower pons, figure 4 B–D) and 3) ICP (medulla oblongata, figure 4 A–C). In this way, we visualized the intersection between the SCP and the ICP (figure A–C) and the 3D spatial relationship between the MCP and the SCP/ICP respectively (figure 4 B, D).

Figure 4. The three cerebellar peduncles.

Figure 4

Sagittal b0 image showing the superior (SCP- see purple ROI) and Inferior cerebellar peduncles (ICP – see yellow ROI) crossing in the cerebellar white matter core. From the yellow ROI in the brainstem, a pathway connecting to the diencephalon is also tracked B) Sagittal b0 image showing the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP – see red ROI & white arrow). C) Sagittal view, no background showing the fiber-crossing region (FC) between the inferior and the superior cerebellar peduncles (white arrows) at higher magnification. D) Coronal b0 image showing the precise location of the ROI used to seed the MCP (red ROI, white arrow).

5. Connections that link the deep cerebellar nuclei with the red nucleus and thalamus (ventro-lateral region) ( figure 5 A and B ).

Figure 5. Thalamic – and Rubro-cerebellar connections.

Figure 5

A) Sagittal b0 image showing cerebellar connections with thalamus (green). The ROI (yellow) is positioned in the ventro-lateral thalamus, as seen on the left in sagittal, coronal and axial slices, from above to below. Some fiber trajectories connecting the thalamus to the brainstem are also shown (blue fiber tracts). B) The 3D localization of the ROI (red) in the red nucleus is shown at left in the sagittal, coronal and axial slices, from above to below. The sagittal b0 image shows the rubro-cerebellar connections (green). Some fiber trajectories connecting the red nucleus to the brainstem are also identified (blue fiber tracts).

When the ROI is placed in the region of the ventro-lateral thalamus, fiber trajectories decussate to the contralateral cerebellum and penetrate the medullary core of the cerebellum in the region of the deep cerebellar nuclei. Some fiber trajectories that emanate from the thalamic ROI towards cerebellum cannot be traced to the cerebellum itself. Other fiber solutions identified by the thalamic ROI continue into the spinal cord, likely reflecting ascending spino-thalamic fiber systems.

The ROI placed in the red nucleus (figure 5 B) results in a contingent of fibers that courses into the cerebellum, consistent with the known efferent pathway leading from the interpositus nucleus via red nucleus to thalamus. Other fiber solutions course towards spinal cord. This may reflect fibers in the rubrospinal tract, but it is also possible that it reflects corticospinal fibers in the cerebral peduncles adjacent to the ROI in the red nucleus.

Discussion

In this study, we used Diffusion Spectrum MRI to test whether it is feasible to examine the intrinsic and extrinsic cerebellar circuits in the living human brain. Such ability represents a necessary step in defining pathological anatomy of the spinocerebellar and other ataxic disorders, in describing the cerebellar component of neuropsychiatric illness, and developing biomarkers for disease progression and modifying interventions. We show, for the first time in humans, that DSI has the capacity to elucidate the structural basis of neural circuits in the human cerebellum in vivo.

We improved the intrinsic low-sensitivity of the DSI method by optimizing the acquisition protocol and by using a 32-channel head coil array at 3T to a level that allowed us to reconstruct and visualize cerebellar circuits and pathways.

The study of cerebellar connectional networks is only partially possible with DTI techniques, because DTI suffers from the limitation of being unable to resolve the convergence of multiple fiber bundles/connections into relatively small structures, as occurs in the white matter in the medullary core of the cerebellum, and within the cerebellar cortex itself [23], [36]. DSI, a high angular resolution method which images complex distributions of intra-voxel fiber-orientations, overcomes this limitation of the DTI technique and has the demonstrated capability of identifying fiber crossings within neural structures [24]. This is exemplified by the DSI demonstration of long association fibers pathways in the monkey cerebral hemisphere, observations that were supported by comparison with the results of tract tracing studies using the autoradiographic technique [25]. Further, DSI is sufficiently powerful to map regions of fiber-crossing not only in cerebral white matter, but also in the basis pontis and the cerebral and cerebellar cortices in monkey and human brains post-mortem [26]. It is noteworthy that related techniques such as q-ball imaging may lead to very similar results [37], [38]. However, since DSI represents the most general approach to disentangle complex structures it was used in this investigation. To our knowledge, no attempt has been made to map cerebellar connectivity networks with DSI in humans in vivo.

Combining the ROI-based DSI tractography with high-resolution anatomical images, we were able to visualize the olivo-cerebellar circuits in humans in vivo. The fiber tracks that we demonstrated linking the inferior olivary nucleus with the cerebellar cortex and with collaterals to the deep cerebellar nuclei (olivary-cerebellar nucleus-olivary loop), likely correspond to the course and connectional patterns of the climbing fibers that originate in the inferior olivary nucleus. We were also able to identify essential elements of the intrinsic cerebellar circuitry: the cortico-nuclear projection between deep cerebellar nuclei (fastigial, interpositus and dentate) and the cerebellar cortex; and the intrinsic cerebellar cortical circuitry, characterised by fiber solutions corresponding to the granule cell axons' parallel fibers that traverse the long axis of the cerebellar folium, intersecting with the perpendicularly arranged fiber-tracks consistent with climbing fibers of the olivocerebellar system traced from the ROI in the inferior olive [39]. From tract tracing studies and physiological investigations in animals [16][18], [34], it is known that climbing fibers (CF) originate from neurons in the inferior olivary nucleus and terminate around the proximal dendrites of the Purkinje cell (PC). Parallel fibers (PF), axons of the granule cells, synapse with the distal dendrites of the PC. The CF and PF thus constitute part of the connectivity substrate of the molecular layer in the cerebellar cortex. DSI cannot reach to the level of the synapse, but it does identify the perpendicular orientation of these two cerebellar afferent fiber systems that intersect in the cerebellar molecular layer, and it does so in vivo.

We show the extracerebellar pathways that are linked with the deep cerebellar nuclei in the SCP, MCP and ICP. The capability of the DSI method to resolve crossing fibers also makes it possible to provide a visualization in human in vivo of the complex fiber intersections between the three cerebellar peduncles, previously shown in tracing studies [16], [17], [19]. Such a demonstration has not been possible using DTI.

We have also provided evidence of the ability using DSI to identify the thalamo-cortical pathway in humans by seeding the ventrolateral region of thalamus, and the rubro-cerebellar connection by placing the ROI seed in the red nucleus.

Advantages and limitations of the methodology

Optimizations of the acquisition protocol and the use of a dedicated 32-channel coil with excellent SNR properties based on Wiggins et al. [40], aimed at compensating for some of the unfavorable SNR properties in high b-value diffusion MRI, including averaging of consecutive scans [41]. Using this state-of-the-art methodology and TrackVis 3D for interactive visualization of fiber trajectories, we could map complex cerebellar tracts and connectional pathways.

We note that accuracy of the tractography method is user dependent because reconstruction threshold, turn angle, and mask threshold have to be adapted according to scan parameters and image properties. To address this limitation, we applied identical tracking parameters to all the data processing.

Further, despite the advanced technology and methods used for DSI acquisition, in some cases we could only partially map the cerebellar circuit of interest. For example, we could visualize only a subset of the fibers tracks connecting the dentate nucleus ROI to the cerebellar cortex.

We hypothesize that this could have happened for three reasons: first, the dentate nucleus is located deep within the cerebellum. Due to the coil design the highest sensitivity and SNR is provided in the superficial layers [40], whereas regions closer to the center of the brain, such as the deep cerebellar structure are imaged with a lower SNR rendering our method less sensitive in these regions. Second, the dentate nucleus is a small structure where fiber trajectories potentially diverge at smaller angles than the angular resolution power of our DSI acquisition scheme.

For similar reasons, we could not track the complete path connecting the ROI in thalamus and brainstem to the cerebellar cortex via the deep cerebellar nuclei. Two separate fiber bundles belonging to these pathways had to be delineated: first from the ROI in thalamus and brainstem to the cerebellar deep nuclei, and then from the deep nuclei to the cortex. Third, subject motion as well as brain pulsation originating from cardiac and respiration cycles may limit DSI tracking. Future iterations of this DSI approach could be enhanced by combining specific higher SNR and angular resolution at reduced scan times, as well as adding image registration methods.

It is notable that all subjects tolerated the scan protocol with minimal or no evidence of motion according to qualitative visual inspections of the low b-value images, i.e. motion is evaluated to be in the sub-voxel regime and thus of minimal influence for our analysis.

In sum, we were able for the first time to visualize human cerebellar circuits in vivo non-invasively using DSI. We demonstrate pathways and connections that are in general agreement with histological tract tracing studies in animal models. In vivo DSI of the cerebellum has the potential to introduce new insights into the pathophysiology of neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases, and to provide anatomical and connectional biomarkers of cerebellar disease.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Hubertus Fischer, Dr. Thorsten Feiweier and Karsten Jahns, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany, for their outstanding coil development work and their continuous support of this investigation for technical support. The authors also thank Dr. Patric Hagmann for initiating the DSI work at the Lausanne facility. The valuable assistance of Jason MacMore BA is also appreciated.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The co-authors H. Meyer and G. Krueger are Siemens AG employees.

Funding: The work was supported by the Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM) of Geneva - Lausanne, the Universities of Geneva and Lasuanne as welll as the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), the foundations Leenaards and Louis-Jeantet and Siemens AG (Erlangen). NH was also supported by NIH 5PO1NS 35611.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Holmes G. The cerebellum of man. Brain. 1939;62:1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schmahmann JD. An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:1178–1187. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530230086029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121 (Pt 4):561–579. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.4.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schmahmann JD. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16:367–378. doi: 10.1176/jnp.16.3.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bauman ML, Kemper TL. Neuroanatomic observations of the brain in autism: a review and future directions. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2005;23:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Okugawa G, Nobuhara K, Minami T, Takase K, Sugimoto T, et al. Neural disorganization in the superior cerebellar peduncle and cognitive abnormality in patients with schizophrenia: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006;30:1408–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schmahmann JD, Weilburg J, Sherman J. The neuropsychiatry of the cerebellum – insights from the clinic. Cerebellum. 2007;6:254–267. doi: 10.1080/14734220701490995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Catani M, Jones D, Daly E, Embiricos N, Deeley Q, et al. Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome. NeuroImage. 2008;41:1184–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malacarne M. Nuova esposizione della struttura del cervelletto umano. Turino: G Brolio; 1776. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolk L. In: Das Cerebellum der Saugetiere. Bohn F, editor. Jena: Fischer; 1906. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Larsell O, Jansen J. The Comparative Anatomy and Histology of the Cerebellum. The Human Cerebellum, Cerebellar Connections, and Cerebellar Cortex. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duvernoy HM. The Human Brainstem and Cerebellum: Surface, Structure, Vascularization, and Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy With MRI. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schmahmann JD, Doyon J, Toga A, Evans A, Petrides M. MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dimitrova A, Weber J, Redies C, Kindsvater K, Maschke M, et al. MRI atlas of the human cerebellar nuclei. Neuroimage. 2002;17:240–255. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Essen DC. Surface-based atlases of cerebellar cortex in the human, macaque, and mouse. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;978:468–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb07588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jansen J, Brodal A. Experimental studies on the intrinsic fibres of the cerebellum. II. The cortico-nuclear projection. J Comp Neurol. 1940;73:267–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jansen J, Brodal A. Experimental studies on the intrinsic fibres of the cerebellum. III. The cortico-nuclear projection in the rabbit and the monkey (Macacus rhesus). Norske Vid Akad, Avh I, Math Nat KI. 1942;3:1–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Snider RS, Eldred E. Cerebrocerebellar relationships in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1952;15:27–40. doi: 10.1152/jn.1952.15.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chambers WW, Sprague JM. Functional localization in the cerebellum. I. Organization in longitudinal cortico-nuclear zones and their contribution to the control of posture, both extrapyramidal and pyramidal. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1955;103:105–129. doi: 10.1002/cne.901030107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Middleton FA, Strick PL. Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function. Science. 1994;266:458–461. doi: 10.1126/science.7939688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schmahmann JD, editor. The Cerebellum and Cognition. Int Rev Neurobiol vol. 41. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nandi D, Aziz TZ, Liu X, Stein JF. Brainstem motor loops in the control of movement. Mov Disord. 2002;17(Suppl 3):S22–27. doi: 10.1002/mds.10139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Salamon N, Sicotte N, Drain A, Frew A, Alger JR, et al. White matter fiber tractography and color mapping of the normal human cerebellum with diffusion tensor imaging. J Neuroradiol. 2007;34:115–128. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wedeen VJ, Hagmann P, Tseng WY, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM. Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1377–1386. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN, Wang R, Dai G, D'Arceuil HE, et al. Association fibre pathways of the brain: parallel observations from diffusion spectrum imaging and autoradiography. Brain. 2007;130:630–653. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wedeen VJ, Wang RP, Schmahmann JD, Benner T, Tseng WY, et al. Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers. Neuroimage. 2008;41:1267–1277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ. Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:177–182. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang R, Wedeen VJ. Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis. Berlin: Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2007. www.trackvis.org.
  • 29.Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:265–269. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199902)45:2<265::aid-ana21>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haines D. Neuroanatomy: An Atlas of Structures, Sections, and Systems. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brodal P, Brodal A. The olivocerebellar projection in the monkey. Experimental studies with the method of retrograde tracing of horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol. 1981;201:375–393. doi: 10.1002/cne.902010306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Voogd J, Ruigrok TJ. The organization of the corticonuclear and olivocerebellar climbing fiber projections to the rat cerebellar vermis: the congruence of projection zones and the zebrin pattern. J Neurocytol. 2004;33:5–21. doi: 10.1023/B:NEUR.0000029645.72074.2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schmahmann JD. Cerebellum and Spinal Cord - Principles of Development, Anatomical Organization, and Functional Relevance. In: Brice A, Pulst S, editors. Spinocerebellar Degenerations: The Ataxias and Spastic Paraplegias. New York: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chambers WW, Sprague JM. Functional localization in the cerebellum. II. Somatotopic organization in cortex and nuclei. American Medical Association Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry. 1955;74:653–680. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1955.02330180071008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haines DE, Dietrichs E. Nonsomatic cerebullar circuits: a broader view of cerebellar involvements in locomotion. J Mot Behav. 1989;21:518–525. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Habas C, Cabanis EA. Anatomical parcellation of the brainstem and cerebellar white matter: a preliminary probabilistic tractography study at 3 T. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:849–863. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0267-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tuch DS. Q-ball imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:1358–1372. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tuch DS, Wisco JJ, Khachaturian MH, Ekstrom LB, Kotter R, et al. Q-ball imaging of macaque white matter architecture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360:869–879. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Braitenberg V, Heck D, Sultan F. The detection and generation of sequences as a key to cerebellar function: experiments and theory. Behav Brain Sci. 1997;20:229–245. discussion 245–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wiggins GC, Triantafyllou C, Potthast A, Reykowski A, Nittka M, et al. 32-channel 3 Tesla receive-only phased-array head coil with soccer-ball element geometry. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:216–223. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.DeLano MC, Cao Y. High b-value diffusion imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2002;12:21–34. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5149(03)00068-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES