Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2009 Feb 1;10(2):395–406. doi: 10.3390/ijms10020395

Investigation on the Protective Effect of α-Mannan against the DNA Damage Induced by Aflatoxin B1 in Mouse Hepatocytes

Eduardo Madrigal-Santillán 1,2, José Antonio Morales-González 2, Manuel Sánchez-Gutiérrez 2, Alicia Reyes-Arellano 3, Eduardo Madrigal-Bujaidar 1,*
PMCID: PMC2660659  PMID: 19333414

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 is a contaminant of agricultural and dairy products that can be related to mutagenic and carcinogenic effects. In this report we explore the capacity of α-mannan (Man) to reduce the DNA damage induced by AFB1 in mouse hepatocytes. For this purpose we applied the comet assay to groups of animals which were first administered Man (100, 400 and 700 mg/kg, respectively) and 20 min later 1.0 mg/kg of AFB1. Liver cells were obtained at 4, 10, and 16 h after the chemical administration and examined. The results showed no protection of the damage induced by AFB1 with the low dose of the polysaccharide, but they did reveal antigenotoxic activity exerted by the two high doses. In addition, we induced a co-crystallization between both compounds, determined their fusion points and analyzed the molecules by UV spectroscopy. The obtained data suggested the formation of a supramolecular complex between AFB1 and Man.

Keywords: AflatoxinB1, mannan, mouse hepatocytes, antigenotoxicity

1. Introduction

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a highly toxic difuranocoumarin compound produced by the fungi Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus, among other species. Its mutagenic effects have been well documented in a number of in vitro and in vivo models, where the presence of DNA adducts, DNA breaks, gene mutations, induction of DNA synthesis, and inhibition of DNA repair have been determined, as well as increases in the rate of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) [1,2]. AFB1 is also a strong (Class I) carcinogen in mammalian species, where its exposure can give rise to different types of tumors, particularly in the liver [3]. Moreover, contamination with the chemical may produce considerable economic losses by attacking distinct steps (from sowing to the industrialization process) of different agricultural and dairy products, such as corn, nut, rice, peanut, and sorghum as well as various milk-made products [3,4]. However, the range of contaminated products differs, depending on the country; for example, in Japan, aflatoxins were detected in about 50% of peanut butter and bitter chocolate samples while their presence was not found in corn products; in contrast, a study in China reported 70% contaminated corn products [5,6].

A number of strategies have been tried to minimize the economic and biological problems raised by AFB1 contamination, including the application of adsorbents, heat, irradiation or chemical inactivation [7,8]. Also, the experimental use of genotoxic inhibitors has been assayed; with regard to this last aspect, the beneficial effects of probiotics have been evaluated. We have verified a protective activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in mice fed with AFB1 contaminated corn for six weeks and treated at the same time with the yeast; our results showed an inhibition as high as 70% of the micronuclei and SCE induced by the mycotoxin [9]. Such an effect was related with the presence of polysaccharides in the yeast cell wall. In fact, a number of investigations on this type of chemicals including glucan, α-mannan (Man), and glucomannan have shown interesting beneficial properties related with their antigenotoxic, antioxidative, immunomodulating, anti-infective, and antitumoral capacities [10]. Man in particular, is a highly branched oligosaccharide constituted by a main chain of mannoses linearly joined through α-1–6 bonds, and with α-1–2 and 1–3 bonds in the branches. In an earlier report we showed that the administration of Man for four weeks to mice fed with AFB1 contaminated corn reduced the frequency of micronuclei and SCE about 70 % [11]. Other authors have demonstrated a significant in vitro antimutagenic effect of the compound by reduction of the damage induced by ofloxacin and acridine orange in the chloroplast DNA of Euglena gracilis[12].

Based on these antecedents, we established as the purpose of the present study to determine whether Man can prevent the DNA damage produced by AFB1 in mouse hepatocytes. Another aim was to explore whether the antigenotoxicity of Man could be related to the formation of a chemical complex with the mutagen.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals and animals

The following compounds were purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St Louis, Mo. USA): AFB1, Man, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Triton® X-100, EDTA, low melting point agarose (LMPA), ethidium bromide, trizma base, phosphate buffer saline (PBS), sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, methanol, ethanol (HPLC grade), calcium chloride and disodium sulphate. Normal melting point agarose (NMPA) was obtained from Invitrogen-Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

The experiment was done using eleven-week-old NIH male mice weighing 20 ± 2.0 g, which were obtained from CENID-Microbiology, a department of the Mexican Ministry of Agriculture. The animals were maintained at 23 °C in polypropylene cages (five individuals per cage) with heat-treated hard wooden bedding, in a 12 h dark-light cycle, and 50 ± 10% humidity. They were allowed to freely consume tap water and Purina rodent food. The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee of Ethics and Biosecurity at the National School of Biological Sciences.

2.2. Genotoxicity/antigenotoxicity protocol

2.2.1. Experimental design

AFB1 was dissolved in DMSO/corn oil (1:1), and Man in distilled water. All compounds were administered in a few seconds, without anesthesia, by force feeding using an intragastric cannula to the following seven groups constituted by 15 individuals each: a) a group of mice administered with 0.02 mL of corn oil, b) a group treated with 0.02 mL of DMSO, c) a group treated with 700 mg/kg of Man, d) one more group treated with 1.0 mg/kg of AFB1 and, e) three last groups which were first administered Man (100, 400 and 700 mg/kg, respectively), and 20 min later with 1.0 mg/kg of AFB1. The administered doses were selected on the basis of preliminary assays that evaluated the potential genotoxicity and systemic toxicity of the involved chemicals. Results obtained in animals treated with DMSO/corn oil (1:1) were similar to the determined with the independent compounds.

At 4, 10, and 16 h post-administration, five mice per group were cervically dislocated and dissected to obtain their liver in iced PBS; a fraction of the organ was then macerated to obtain a cell suspension which was adjusted to about 10,000 cells/mL. The trypan blue method was used to determine the number of viable cells, which was always more than 85%.

2.3. Unicellular alkaline electrophoresis (comet) assay

We followed a previously reported method [13,14]. First, we deposited NMPA (110 μL) on a fully frosted slide, and onto this layer we then put a mixture of the cell suspension (10 μL) plus LMPA (75 μL), and finally, we added another layer of LMPA (75 μL). After a few minutes, the mixture solidified and the slide was placed at 4° C in a Coplin jar containing the lysis solution (NaCl 2.5 M, EDTA 100 mM, trizma base 10 mM, 1% Triton® X-100, and 10% DMSO). Twenty-four hours later the nuclei were placed in alkaline buffer (NaOH 30 mM and EDTA 1 mM, pH >13) for 30 min, and then in an electrophoresis chamber for 20 min at 300 mA, 23 V, and pH>13. Slides were subsequently washed three times (5 min each) with a 0.4 M trizma solution made in deionized water, pH 7.5 to neutralize the earlier process, and dried at room temperature. Finally, the nucleoids were stained with ethidium bromide (50 μL).

Observations were made at 400X in an epifluorescent microscope (Axiophot-1, Carl Zeiss) equipped with a digital camera (ZWS-47DE), and a program for capturing, processing and analyzing images (Carl Zeiss, KS400 version 3.01). In 100 nucleoids per dose/time, we recorded the extent of DNA damage caused by the mutagen and the protection exerted by the polysaccharide. For this purpose we obtained the length-to-width index (T/N index) measuring the image length and dividing the result by the head diameter [13,15]. The obtained data were statistically analyzed with the ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman Keuls test, using the GraphPad Instat program, version 2 (for Windows). In addition, we also determined the percentage of cells without DNA migration and those with migration according to 4 grades of damage, where grade 0 corresponded to intact nuclei with no DNA displacement, grade 1 to comets with a length no more than half of the nuclear diameter, grade 2 to no more than the length of one nuclear diameter, and grade 3 to more than one nuclear diameter.

2.4. Crystallization, melting point determination, and spectroscopic analysis

The tested chemicals were co-crystallized following preliminary assays to determine the appropriate experimental conditions. Based on these results, we dissolved AFB1 (5 mg) in HPLC grade ethanol (5 mL), and Man in a mix of ethanol-deionized water (1:1). Then, each solution (1 mL) was mixed in the dark (at 26 °C, pH=7.0); crystals were formed for 11 days by means of the hanging drop technique [16]. The obtained uncolored crystals were dried with CaCl2 for 72 h; after that, their melting point was obtained twice using electrothermal equipment (Barnstead/Thermoline). Finally, the remaining crystals were dissolved in ethanol-deionized water (1:1) and UV analyzed in the range 200–400 nm with a Perkin Elmer Lambda 19 spectrophotometer.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the comet measurements obtained in our assay. To summarize, at the fourth hour of the schedule we found no significant DNA damage induced by the tested chemicals: mice treated with the control agents had a mean T/N index of 1.1, and animals treated with AFB1 as well as those administered with 100 mg/kg of Man plus the mutagen had a slight comet increase. At 10 h we found similar behavior regarding the control and the Man treated animals, although in mice administered only AFB1 we determined a T/N index increase of about four times as much. With respect to the groups treated with the combination of chemicals, no protection was observed when the low dose of Man was applied. However, a clear antigenotoxic effect was found with the two high doses; particularly with 700 mg/kg of Man, the prevention of DNA damage was about 50%. Then, at 16 h, the genotoxicity of AFB1 and the protection exerted by Man continued although to a lesser extent. The higher level of DNA damage at 10 h with respect to that found in the other evaluated times corresponds to the schedule where maximum breakage is present in our model, and it agrees with results reported for an acute comet assay with a single administration; moreover, because the assay also detects the repair process [17] which, in our case, can begin after 10 h of exposure to the chemicals.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Antigenotoxic effect of α-mannan (Man) against the DNA damage induced by aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in mouse hepatocytes.

Results are the mean ± SD of 5 mice per group (100 nuclei per doses) a statistically significant difference with respect to the value of the control groups and, b with respect to the value obtained in mice treated with AFB1 only. ANOVA and Student–Newman Keuls tests, p ≤ 0.05.

Table 1 shows percentages describing the grades of damage determined in the experiment. The data agree with the comet measurements presented earlier. Nucleoids of control animals, as well as those treated with Man alone corresponded mostly to grades 0 and 1; however, nucleoids of mice treated with the mutagen and with the low dose of Man plus AFB1 had a significant increase of grade 2 and 3, but with the high dose of Man plus AFB1, they showed more than a 50 % reduction in the rate of such grades of damage.

Table 1.

Grades of damage determined in the hepatocytes of mice treated with α-mannan (Man), and with aflatoxin B1 (AFB1).

Agent/dose Time (h) Grades of damage (%)

G0 G1 G2 G3
Corn oil
0.02 mL
4 84 13 2 1
10 87 11 2 0
16 92 4 3 1

DMSO
0.02 mL
4 77 17 4 2
10 87 5 4 4
16 86 8 4 2

Man
700 mg/kg
4 91 7 2 0
10 85 10 3 2
16 89 6 3 2
AFB1 1.0 mg/kg 4 72 12 8 8
10 2 9 24 65
16 18 18 27 37

Man + AFB1
100 + 1.0 mg/kg
4 67 8 10 15
10 4 10 29 57
16 16 20 30 34

Man + AFB1
400 + 1.0 mg/kg
4 75 12 8 5
10 23 20 23 35
16 32 15 25 28

Man + AFB1
700 + 1.0 mg/kg
4 80 14 3 3
10 42 18 17 23
16 36 28 19 17

Data were obtained from 100 nuclei/mouse (5 mice per group).

Data corresponding to the melting point of the obtained crystals are presented in Table 2. Crystals formed by AFB1 plus Man exhibited an intermediate value in comparison with the melting point of the independent compounds. The melting point of the joined compounds was higher than that of AFB1 but lower than that of Man.

Table 2.

Melting points of the crystals formed by aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) plus α-mannan (Man), and of the independent compounds.

Chemical Melting point (°C)
AFB1/Man 182.5
AFB1 132.5
Man 246.0

Figure 2a shows the UV spectrum of the crystals obtained. The presence of AFB1 in the mixture is clear, as indicated by its characteristic maximum peaks at 223, 261, and 364 nm, which were very similar to those detected in the spectrum of the mutagen in independent form (Figure 2b). Moreover, the spectrum obtained with the crystals differs sharply from that obtained with the polysaccharide alone, which showed no peaks in the range from 220 to 400 nm (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

UV spectrum of the crystals formed by aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) plus Man (a), and the corresponding to AFB1 (b). The λ values in the ordinate of (a) vary from 0.06 to 3.50, in (b) the values are from 0.06 to 1.00. The maximum peaks in (a) (224, 266, and 363 nm) show a correspondence with the detected in (b) (222, 264, and 358 nm).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

UV spectrum of the crystals formed by Man. The λ values in the ordinate vary from 0.005 to 0.230. No peaks were found in the spectrum.

There is experimental and epidemiological evidence that naturally occurring compounds, including polysaccharides, have the ability to protect against mutagenic damage. Furthermore, the cell wall of yeasts is also known to be composed of complex polymers of β-glucans, α-mannans, mannoproteins, and a minor amount of chitin, all of which have a number of bioprotective properties [18]. In the field of antimutagenesis and chemoprevention, however, Man seems the less studied component of the yeast cell wall, although its positive in vitro effect against oxidant and intercalating agents has been reported, as has its capacity to reduce chromosome alterations induced in vivo by AFB1 [11,12].

In the present assay we determined its capacity to partially prevent the DNA damage induced by AFB1 in mouse hepatocytes. Our results also suggest a probable better response with higher doses of Man, in light of the absence of systemic toxicity reported for the chemical in mouse and because of the very favorable antigenotoxic effect achieved with the high dose tested. Other authors have used the comet assay in the human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) to determine the chemopreventive effect of β-glucan against benzo(a)pyrene [19], and they found results similar to those reported in the present in vivo study.

In regard to polysaccharides, including Man, at least two antigenotoxic mechanisms of action have been proposed. One of these refers to their action as antioxidant agents, an activity suggested in various models that have evaluated the mutagenicity induced by acetaminophen, cyclophosphamide, adryamicin, cisplatin, and ofloxacin, [12,20,21]. Moreover, glucans and mannans have proven to be antioxidants by applying various methods in vitro and in vivo [2224]. The other chemopreventive mechanism is related to its adsorbing effect. In regard to this mechanism, a number of epidemiological reports have suggested that a low fat, high fiber diet is beneficial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, as well as of colon and breast cancer, in the latter cases probably by absorbing carcinogens and promoters, and increasing stool bulk to facilitate their elimination [25,26]. Preclinical studies have also revealed that phytochemicals act to retard, block, or reverse carcinogenesis, as in the case of coffee fiber (arabino-galactose polymer) and pectin which significantly reduced the rate of azoxymethane-induced aberrant colonic cripts in rat [27], likewise, wheat bran arabinoxylans have shown induction of the detoxifying enzyme glutathione S-transferase and reduction of genotoxicity by hydrogen peroxide and 4-hydroxynonenal in HT29 colon cancer cells [28].

AFB1 mutagenicity is related to its metabolic activation by CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and/or CYP1A2, forming an exo-8,9 epoxide which is highly reactive and binds to the N-7 position of guanine residues in DNA [29]. In developing countries in particular, AFB1 contamination may pose a significant health problem due to discontinuous monitoring and inefficient storage conditions, as shown by tumor development which seriously affect various countries, particularly in Africa [30]. This is compelling evidence that decreasing such contamination is important. In the experimental conditions of the present study, the comet assay detected genotoxic damage produced by the mutagen after its rapid absorption by the small intestine and its transportation to the liver cells by the mesenteric blood, as well as residual DNA damage that Man (which is not absorbed in the intestine) was unable to eliminate from the digestive tract, probably because of incomplete adsorption. In this respect, Man probably envelops the mutagen and both compounds constitute a supramolecular complex. We suggest this protective mechanism of Man because, considering the melting point which is a criterion of chemical purity, we detected an intermediate value in the AFB1-Man crystals in comparison to the value obtained for the independent compounds; other reasons are that the spectrum of the AFB1-Man crystals does not correspond to the characteristics of Man, and that the melting point data show that the crystal was not formed solely by AFB1. Interestingly, however, the AFB1-Man spectrum apparently had no changes in the mycotoxin structure. These data agree with the formation of a supramolecule, where the subunits are joined by non-covalent bonds, and where the chemical architecture can be supported by weak interactions such as hydrogen bonds, C-H π, or π- π among others [31, 32, 33]. In our study, the -OH groups from the polysaccharide (which is an H donor) may perhaps be joined to the O atoms of AFB1, especially to the vicinal C=O groups, thereby forming a cyclic supramolecular synthon.

4. Conclusions

In the present investigation we demonstrated the capacity of Man to protect against the DNA damage induced by AFB1 in mouse hepatocytes, and consequently, the potential preventive effect of the compound against cancer development. Moreover, we provided evidence which suggests that such an effect was due to a supramolecular complex formed between the two involved compounds. This information is congruent with previous reports on the bioprotective effects of Man, as well as with studies on other polysaccharides of the cell wall of yeasts. However, our data also suggest the need to explore other experimental conditions, so as to improve the observed effect of Man and to determine this capacity on damaged colon cells. This is so, moreover, because the interaction of the tested compounds with other molecules of the diet can influence the effect in this organ. Besides, it seems pertinent to extend in vivo studies on the matter in regard to all yeast polysaccharides, as well as to perform long time assays.

References

  • 1.Wang JS, Groopman JD. DNA Damage by Mycotoxins. Mutat. Res. 1999;424:167–181. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Witt KL, Knapton A, Wehr CM, Hook GJ, Mirsalis J, Shelby MD, MacGregor JT. Micronucleated Erythrocyte Frequency in Peripheral Blood of B6C3F(1) Mice from Short-Term, Prechronic, and Chronic Studies of the NTP Carcinogenesis Bioassay Program. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2000;36:163–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Steyn PS. Mycotoxins, General View, Chemistry and Structure. Toxicol Lett. 1995;82–83:843–851. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03525-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cleveland TE, Dowd PE, Desjardins AE, Bhatnagar D, Coty PJ. United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service. Research on Preharvest Prevention of Mycotoxins and Mycotoxigenic Fungi in US Crops. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2003;59:629–642. doi: 10.1002/ps.724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kumagai S, Nakajima M, Tabata S, Ishikuro E, Tanaka T, Norizuki H, Itoh Y, Aoyama K, Fujita K, Kai S, Sato T, Yoshiike N, Sugita-Konishi Y.Aflatoxin and ochratoxin. A Contamination of Retail Foods and Intake of These Mycotoxins in Japan Food Add Contam 2008August151–6. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang J, Liu XM. Contamination of Aflatoxins in Different Kinds of Foods in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2007;20:483–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Samarajeewa U, Sen AC, Cohen MA, Wei CI. Detoxification of Aflatoxins in Foods and Feeds by Physical and Chemical Methods. J Food Prot. 1990;53:489–501. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-53.6.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Robb J. Mycotoxins: Contamination and Decontamination. Feed Mix. 1993;1:18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Madrigal-Santillan E, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Marquez-Marquez R, Reyes A. Antigenotoxic Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the Damage Produced in Mice Fed with Aflatoxin B1 Contaminated Corn. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006;44:2058–2063. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kogan G, Pajtinka M, Babincova M, Miadoková E, Rauko P, Slamenova D, Korolenko TA. Yeast Cell Wall Polysaccharides as Antioxidants and Antimutagens: Can They Fight Cancer? Neoplasma. 2008;55:387–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Madrigal-Santillan E, Alvarez-Gonzalez I, Marquez-Marquez R, Velazquez-Guadarrama N, Madrigal-Bujaidar E. Inhibitory Effect of Mannan on the Toxicity Produced in Mice Fed Aflatoxin B1 Contaminated Corn. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007;53:466–472. doi: 10.1007/s00244-006-0074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Križková L, Ďuracková Z, Šandula J, Sasinková V, Krajčovič J. Antioxidative and Antimutagenic Activity of Yeast Cell Wall Mannans in Vitro. Mutat. Res. 2001;497:213–222. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00257-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hartmann A, Agurell E, Beevers C, Brendler-Schaab S, Burlinson B, Clay P, Collins A, Smith A, Speit G, Thybaud V, Tice RR. Recommendations for Conducting the in Vivo Alkaline Comet Assay. Mutagenesis. 2003;18:45–51. doi: 10.1093/mutage/18.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ralph S, Petras M. Comparison of Sensitivity to Methyl Methanesulphonate Among Tadpole Developmental Stages Using the Alkaline Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet) Assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1998;31:374–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Castillo-Cadena J, Tenorio-Vieyra LE, Quintana-Carabia AI, Garcia-Fabila MM, Ramirez-San Juan E, Madrigal-Bujaidar E. Determination of DNA Damage in Floriculturists Exposed to Mixtures of Pesticides. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006(2):1–12. doi: 10.1155/JBB/2006/97896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bergfors TM. Protein Crystallization Technique Strategies and Tips A Laboratory Manual. International University Line; La Jolla, California, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tice RR. The single cell gel comet assay A microgel electrophoretic technique for the detection of DNA damage and repair in individual cells. In: Phillips DH, Venitt S, editors. Environmental mutagenesis. Bios Scientific Publishers; Oxford, UK: 1995. pp. 315–339. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miadoková E, Svidová S, Ulčová V, Dǜhová V, Nad’ová S, Rauko P, Kogan G. Diverse Biomodulatory Effects of Glucomannan from Candida utilis. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2006;20:649–657. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Friedman Angeli JP, Ribeiro LJ, Ferreira Bellini M, Mantovani MS.β-Glucan Extracted from the Medicinal Mushroom Agaricus blazei Prevents the Genotoxic Effects of Benzo(a)pyrene in the Human Hepatoma Cell Line HepG2 Arch Toxicol 2008June5 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tohamy AA, El Ghor AA, El Nahas SM, Noshy MM. β-Glucan Inhibits the Genotoxicity of Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and Cisplatin. Mutat. Res. 2003;541:45–53. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(03)00184-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Toklu HS, Öser Seirli A, Velioğlu-Öğunc A, Centinel S, Sener G. Acetaminophen-Induced Toxicity is Prevented by β-D-Glucan Treatment in Mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;543:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Babincova M, Bacova Z, Machova E, Kogan G. Antioxidant Properties of Carboxymethyl Glucan: Comparative Analysis. J. Med. Food. 2002;5:79–83. doi: 10.1089/109662002760178159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Križkova L, Žitňanová I, Mislovičová D, Masárová J, Sasinková V, Ďuračková Z, Krajčovič Antioxidant and Antimutagenic Activity of Mannan Neoglycoconjugates: Mannan-Human Serum Albumine and Mannan-Penicillin G Acylase. Mutat Res. 2006;606:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Toklu HZ, Şener G, Jahovic N, Uslu B, Arbak S, Yeğen B. B-Glucan Protects Against Burn-Induced Oxidative Organ Damage in Rats. Intern. Immunopharmacol. 2006;6:156–169. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Weisburger JH. Antimutagens, Anticarcinogens, and Effective Worldwide Cancer Prevention. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 1999;18:85–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weisburger JH. Lifestyle, Health and Disease Prevention: The Underlying Mechanisms. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;(Suppl 2):51–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rao CV, Chou D, Simi B, Ku H, Reddy BS. Prevention of Colonic Aberrant Crypt Foci and Modulation of Large Bowel Microbial Activity by Dietary Coffee Fiber, Inulin and Pectin. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:1815–1819. doi: 10.1093/carcin/19.10.1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Glei M, Hofman T, Küster K, Hollmann J, Linhahuer MG, Pool-Zobel BL. Both Weath (Triticum aestivum) Bran Arabinoxylans and Gut Flora-Mediated Fermentation Products Protect Human Colon Cells from Genotoxic Activities of 4-Hydroxynonenal and Hydrogen Peroxide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54:2088–2095. doi: 10.1021/jf052768e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miranda DDC, Arçari DP, Ladeira MSP, Calori-Dominguez MA, Romero AC, Salvadori DMF, Gloria EM, Pedrazzoli J, Jr, Ribeiro ML. Analysis of DNA Damage Induced by Aflatoxin B1 in Dunkin-Hartley Guinea Pigs. Mycopathologia. 2007;163:275–280. doi: 10.1007/s11046-007-9014-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anderson D, Yu T-W, Hambly RJ, Mendy M, Wild CP. Aflatoxin Exposure and DNA Damage in the Comet Assay in Individuals from the Gambia, West Africa. Teratog, Carcinog, Mutagen. 1999;19:147–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Steed JW, Turner DR, Wallace KJ. Core Concepts in Supramolecular Chemistry and Nanochemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2007. pp. 5–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reyes-Arellano A, Rose R, Steller I, Sustmann R. Crystal engineering: Supramolecular Structures by Cocrystallization of meso-1,2-diphenyl-1,2-ethanediol and bisimines. Simple Cases of Moleular Recognition. J. Struct. Chem. 1995;6:391–396. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reyes A, Nájera J, Mendoza R, Molins I, Grau E, Espinosa E, Salgado H, Tamariz J, Soriano M, Paneerselvam K. Bisimines in Supramolecular Synthesis. Supramol Chem. 1999;11:17–24. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES