Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1987 May;25(5):819–823. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.819-823.1987

Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system.

R B Thomson Jr, T M File Jr, J S Tan, B L Evans
PMCID: PMC266095  PMID: 3294885

Abstract

A blood culture was performed by adding a vented Septi-Chek bottle (Roche Diagnostics, Div. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, N.J.) to a standard BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.) blood culture. The yield of bacteremic patients, the clinical significance of organisms detected, and the cost of the combination system were compared with those of the standard BACTEC system alone. Each culture included 20 ml of blood divided among a BACTEC 6B aerobic bottle (5 ml), a BACTEC 7D anaerobic bottle (5 ml), and a Septi-Chek bottle equipped with a slide subculture attachment (10 ml). Significant isolates grew in 9.6% of the 2,269 cultures evaluated. The combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek system detected 25% more bacteremic patients than the BACTEC system alone, 129 patients versus 103. The 26 bacteremic patients detected by only the added Septi-Chek bottle included 7 whose organism was isolated from blood alone and 19 whose organism was in mixed or pure culture from a second source. Detection of the organism resulted in alteration of antimicrobial therapy in 17 of these 26 patients. The combination system, which cultured a 20-ml blood volume, cost $11,000 more during the study period than the BACTEC system alone, which cultured a 10-ml volume. Reimbursement under the diagnosis-related group system was increased by $23,000 as a result of documentation of sepsis in these 26 patients. Blood volume and, possibly, the use of multiple blood culture systems are important factors when selecting a blood culture procedure for routine use.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brannon P., Kiehn T. E. Large-scale clinical comparison of the lysis-centrifugation and radiometric systems for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):951–954. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.951-954.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):107–110. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Plorde J. J., Tenover F. C., Carlson L. G. Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):292–295. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.292-295.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Stratton C. W., Reimer L. G., Wang W. L. Controlled evaluation of the agar-slide and radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221–225. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.221-225.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES