Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1987 May;25(5):840–844. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.840-844.1987

Impact of prolonged incubation on disk diffusion susceptibility test results for Staphylococcus aureus.

M E Mulligan, D M Citron, R Y Kwok, J P Wheelock, F K Farrohi, J A Hindler, L Johnston
PMCID: PMC266100  PMID: 3584420

Abstract

Because strains of Staphylococcus aureus that are resistant to penicillinase-resistant penicillins may be difficult to detect in the clinical laboratory, a variety of changes in methodology have been suggested to increase their detection. In 1984, the West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center experienced an increase in clinically significant strains of oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. To insure that such strains would not be missed by the disk diffusion test methods employed for routine testing, changes in methodology were insituted. These included interpreting zone diameters around oxacillin disks at 48 h of incubation. We collected 139 isolates from patients thought to have oxacillin-resistant S. aureus based on these test results and later retested the isolates using microdilution MIC testing. Only 85 isolates (61%) had microdilution oxacillin MICs of greater than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml, whereas 54 (39%) had oxacillin MICs of less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml. A review of medical records revealed that in 1 year there were 98 patients with isolates appearing resistant by disk diffusion but not confirmed by microdilution MICs; many patients were placed in isolation and treated with specific antimicrobial agents. We conclude that incubation of oxacillin disk diffusion tests for longer than 24 h in conjunction with disregard for resistance to other classes of antimicrobial agents may result in an unacceptably high degree of false resistance results. Because the resistance of S. aureus has important therapeutic and infection control implications, it is necessary to recognize problems that may result in ambiguous or inaccurate susceptibility results.

Full text

PDF
840

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haley R. W., Hightower A. W., Khabbaz R. F., Thornsberry C., Martone W. J., Allen J. R., Hughes J. M. The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in United States hospitals. Possible role of the house staff-patient transfer circuit. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):297–308. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hansen S. L., Freedy P. K. Variation in the abilities of automated, commercial, and reference methods to detect methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):494–499. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.494-499.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hindler J. A., Inderlied C. B. Effect of the source of Mueller-Hinton agar and resistance frequency on the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):205–210. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.205-210.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McDougal L. K., Thornsberry C. New recommendations for disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;19(4):482–488. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.4.482-488.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McDougal L. K., Thornsberry C. The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 May;23(5):832–839. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.5.832-839.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peacock J. E., Jr, Moorman D. R., Wenzel R. P., Mandell G. L. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: microbiologic characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and assessment of virulence of an epidemic strain. J Infect Dis. 1981 Dec;144(6):575–582. doi: 10.1093/infdis/144.6.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sabath L. D. Mechanisms of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):339–344. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thornsberry C., McDougal L. K. Successful use of broth microdilution in susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1084–1091. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1084-1091.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Welch W. D., Southern P. M. Unusual susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, and tetracycline at 30 degrees C but not at 35 degrees C. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):831–833. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.831-833.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES