Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Entomol. 2004 Aug;29(3):210–213. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00410.x

Does environmental stress affect insect-vectored parasite transmission?

J G VONTAS 1, L McCARROLL 2, S H P P KARUNARATNE 3, C LOUIS 1,4, H HURD 5, J HEMINGWAY 2
PMCID: PMC2661066  EMSID: UKMS2093  PMID: 19330047

Introduction

In some insects, the cost of parasitic infection can be sufficient to elicit natural selection against competent hosts (Yan et al., 1997). This tendency may be compensated for by increased parasite susceptibility being linked to environmental stress. Obvious examples of variable environmental stress include insecticide selection from disease control operations and seasonal stress through heat and dehydration in some insect species. Vectorial capacity (i.e. the ability of mosquitoes to ingest parasites and to promote their maturation until the infective stage) and the rate of insect survival until parasite maturation (Failloux et al., 1995), can differ geographically according to insect strain (Crans, 1973; McGreevy et al., 1982). The sandfly, Phlebotomus papatasi, transmits cutaneous leishmaniasis in desert and savannah regions of the Old World, where seasonal stress and dehydration reduces the quantity of sugar in plant leaves that is available for insect feeding. Selection for hunger tolerance has produced a population of P. papatasi that has sufficient longevity from feeding on the sugar depleted leaves to deposit their eggs and transmit Leishmania (Schlein & Jacobson, 2000). This inherited trait may alter the insects' physiology and disrupt the interaction between insect and parasite, altering the insects' susceptibility to infection. A similar effect of selection for hunger tolerance on susceptibility to Leishmania major infection occurs in Jordanian P. papatasi (Schlein & Jacobson, 2001).

Another factor that may explain geographical differences in vectorial capacity is insecticide selection pressure. Many questions remain unresolved on the evolutionary fitness costs and vectorial capacity of insects that are resistant to insecticides (Ferdig et al., 1993; Kraaijeveld & Godfrey, 1997; Yan et al., 1997).

The primary means of controlling mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria and filariasis is by targeting the vector species using residual spraying with insecticides. The development of insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors is common (Hemingway & Ranson, 2000). Insecticides are still commonly used for Culex control, although the strategic plan for lymphatic filariasis elimination by 2020 (World Health Organization, 1999) is heavily dependent on drug treatment. Culex quinquefasciatus, the major vector of filariasis, uses one predominant esterase-based organophosphate resistance mechanism that occurs in more than 80% of insecticide-resistant populations worldwide (Raymond et al., 1991; Hemingway & Karunaratne, 1998). The most common variant of this mechanism originated once and spread rapidly to all continents (Raymond et al., 1991). This resistance depends on the stable germline amplification of two esterase enzymes and an aldehyde oxidase encoded on a 30-kb DNA amplicon (Hemingway et al., 2000). Up to 80 copies of this amplicon can be present per cell in resistant mosquitoes (Paton et al., 2000). In Anopheles mosquitoes, the major malaria vector worldwide, there is a wider variety of insecticide resistance mechanisms, with elevated glutathione S-transferases producing DDT resistance (Prapanthadara et al., 1995; Ranson et al., 2000), elevated P450 monooxygenases combined with an altered sodium channel (kdr) contributing to pyrethroid resistance (Vulule et al., 1999; Chandre et al., 2000) and elevated esterases and altered malathion carboxylesterases producing general organophosphorus and malathion specific resistance, respectively (Brogdon & Barber, 1990; Hemingway, 1982).

Insecticide resistance is assumed to increase the likelihood of mosquito-borne disease transmission by increasing the vector population size and allowing mosquitoes to live longer in the presence of insecticide. The validity of this assumption was tested using Sri Lankan Culex quinquefasciatus and lymphatic filariasis as a model system (McCarroll et al., 2000). In insecticide resistant C. quinquefasciatus, esterases are highly expressed in the midgut, subcuticular layer, Malpighian tubules and salivary glands, resulting in a change in the redox potential in these cells compared with their susceptible counterparts (Hemingway, 2000). Because most mosquito-borne parasites must pass through some of these tissues to complete their development, it is possible that parasite survival, and hence the vectorial capacity of the insect, may be directly affected by the insecticide status of the insects. The study by McCarroll et al. (2000) was the first to attempt to directly examine the relationship between vectorial capacity and insecticide resistance within an insect population. For the first time, this research has now been extended to data from a similar study of malaria, the most prevalent mosquito borne disease, and its Anopheles vectors.

Does insecticide resistance alter malaria parasite development in Anopheles vectors?

The study by McCarroll et al. (2000) demonstrated a negative correlation between filarial infection and insecticide resistance of Culex mosquitoes. Plasmodium, like filarial parasites in Culex, encounters a different cellular environment in insecticide resistant mosquitoes compared with insecticide susceptible mosquitoes, caused by physiological changes accompanying resistance that may affect parasite survival. Malaria parasites undergo a complex developmental cycle when passing through several different tissues within the mosquito vector.

The extensive use of pyrethroid impregnated bednets and other insecticides for malaria control in endemic regions has resulted in the emergence of insecticide resistance in many Anopheles vectors, which makes malaria control problematic. Anopheles gambiae is the major malaria vector in Africa, but pyrethroid resistance in laboratory strains of this species (such as the RSP isolated from East Africa) is relatively low (less than 10-fold). Target site insensitivity (kdr) is an important element in resistance, in combination with a metabolic-based resistance mechanism in East Africa (Nikou et al., 2003; Ortelli et al., 2003). By contrast, there are highly pyrethroid resistant strains of the major Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi, such as the pyrethroid-selected strain DUB-R with 182-fold resistance compared with a pyrethroid susceptible strain ‘BEECH’ (Enayati et al., 2003). Target site insensitivity only partially explains resistance in An. stephensi because the majority is contributed by up-regulation of metabolic enzymes, such as esterases, monooxygenases and glutathione S-transferases. These insecticide resistant and susceptible An. stephensi strains and the malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis, which develops very successfully in this Anopheles vector, were used to investigate any effect of resistance on malaria parasite survival.

Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis Killick-Kendrick (N67) was maintained in CD1 male mice (Ahmed et al., 1999) and parasitemias of infected mice were determined from Giemsa-stained blood films prepared from tail blood. The presence of exflagellating microgametocytes was confirmed by examination of fresh thick blood films before mosquito feeding. Larvae of the resistant (DUB-R) and susceptible (BEECH) An. stephensi strains (Enayati et al., 2003) were reared under standard conditions to produce adults of uniform size. Access to glucose solution was denied to the adult females 12 h before blood feeding. Discrete batches of 35 6-day-old mosquitoes from each strain were fed on the same mouse to ensure that any observed variation was not attributable to differences in the blood/infection quality or the body temperature of the mice. Female mosquitoes that were not fully engorged after feeding were removed from the cage. Four independent pair-wise experiments were performed. Mosquitoes were maintained under standard conditions for 8 days postinfection to determine the prevalence and intensity of infection.

Mosquito midguts were dissected and suspended in a 2% aqueous solution of mercurochrome to allow contrasting vital staining of the oocysts. The number of oocysts and melanization spots per gut was counted under a light microscope and the mean number of developing oocysts/midgut was determined.

Table 1 gives a comparison of the number of ookinetes that successfully traversed the midgut epithelium to form oocysts in pyrethroid resistant (DUBS-R) vs. susceptible (BEECH) An. stephensi. There was no significant difference between the two strains, and a similar number of melanized ookinetes were produced in both mosquito strains (data not shown).

Table 1.

Comparison of number of oocysts developed in insecticide resistant and susceptible Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes.

An. stephensi
species
Mouse Prevalence of
infection
Arithmetic mean
of oocysts
Arithmetic mean
of oocysts per group
Probability
(P=0.05)
BEECH 1 5.3% 16±11 (n=23) 14 P=0.41
2 8% 15±12 (n=25)
3 9.2% 13±10 (n=30)
4 7.8% 14±11 (n=29)
DUBS-R 1 5.3% 20±18 (n=27) 16
2 8% 16±18 (n=28)
3 9.2% 14±9 (n=25)
4 7.8% 13±9 (n=35)

Each replicate experiment used different batches of 25 mosquitoes from each strain, which were fed on the same infected mouse (1–4). The probability indicating whether the number of oocysts in the midgut of each strain are similar was determined by Student's t-test.

These data are in contrast to recent indications that insecticide resistance and the capacity of the Anopheles vector to host malaria parasite are correlated. For example, a recent morphological, biochemical and genomic approach demonstrated broad physiological differences between parasite refractory and susceptible Anopheles mosquitoes, implicating a detected elevated level of reactive oxygen species as a major factor contributing to parasite melanotic encapsulation (Kumar et al., 2003; Christophides et al., 2004). An enhanced ability of the insecticide resistant insects to tolerate oxidative stress was also implied by the protective role of glutathione S-transferases (Vontas et al., 2001), whereas comparison of superoxide dismutase activity (a major antioxidant enzyme) between the An. stephensi strains used in this study confirmed the presence of enhanced antioxidant defence in the resistant insects (Vontas, unpublished). The lower oxygen free radical damage in insecticide resistant insect tissues containing malaria parasites should improve pathogen survival, although the effect of elevated monooxygenases in the same tissues is not known. Finally, preliminary microarray data indicate that gene expression and associated physiological changes during insecticide metabolism strongly overlap with the oxidoreductative response of Anopheles gambiae to Plasmodium berghei infection (Vontas, Christophides and Ranson, unpublished data). Nevertheless, the redox–oxidoreductative link hypothesized by the above indications between vectorial capacity and insecticide resistance was not found in this study.

The vectorial capacity of various Anopheles taxa to different Plasmodia is highly influenced by the diverse ecoethological characteristics of the mosquitoes and the complex molecular interactions between the two organisms. The success of the ookinete to oocyst differentiation, which is a critical stage in parasite development, appears to differ significantly between different parasite–mosquito combinations (Christophides et al., 2004). The refractory phenotypes in a genetically selected strain of Anopheles vectors are highly Plasmodium species-specific with refractory strains remaining totally susceptible (Somboon et al., 1999), emphasizing the specificity of the interaction between mosquito and parasite. It is possible that the physiological differences, related to the production and detoxification of reactive oxygen species, identified in An. gambiae refractory and susceptible mosquitoes (Kumar et al., 2003) are specific to the An. gambiae–rodent P. berghei model system and this might explain our negative result in the An. stephensiP. y. nigeriensis system. However, there is sufficient justification for further investigation of the possible association between insecticide resistance and vectorial capacity phenotypes, in other mosquito-Plasmodium systems, such as the primary vector An. gambiae (using a recently isolated highly insecticide resistant strains from West Africa) and the rodent parasite P. berghei or human parasites. This work is ongoing. In addition, parasite survival at the sporozoite level is being determined in insecticide resistant vs. susceptible strains. The research should ultimately lead to novel measures for malaria control, via insect transgenesis or the development of ‘smart’ insecticides capable of disrupting interactions that are protective to the parasite and/or enhancing antagonistic ones.

Alternative forms of stress selection can produce a different response

By contrast to the decreased susceptibility resulting from insecticide pressure in Culex, selection for hunger tolerance in P. papatasi produced increased susceptibility to parasite infection (Schlein & Jacobson, 2001). Selection of a colony of P. papatasi of Jordanian origin for hunger tolerance increased susceptibility to L. major infection from 25% to between 80 and 64%. This increase in susceptibility was an inherited characteristic and not a direct result of preinfection hunger. It is not clear what physiological changes are being selected in the sandflies to produce the hunger tolerance, although simple gross differences in sandfly size have been ruled out. In this case, the selective effect seen in the laboratory colony also appeared to hold in the field, with larger proportions of the F1 sandflies from an arid (sugar deprived) area becoming infected compared with F1 insects from an oasis collection site. The results from both studies show the interdependence of different selectable insect characteristics, where phenotypes influenced by different environmental conditions can affect the balance between parasite and vector.

Acknowledgements

We thank Pam Taylor, Ann Underhill and Victoria Carter at Keele University for assistance. J.V. is supported by the General Secretarial of Research and Technology, Greece. L.McC. is supported by a special research fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust and the Medical Research Council. S.H.P.P.K. is supported by a Wellcome Trust Fellowship.

References

  1. Ahmed AM, Taylor P, Maingon R, Hurd H. The effect of Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis on the reproductive fitness of Anopheles gambiae. Invertebrate Reproductive Development. 1999;36:217–222. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brogdon WG, Barber AM. Fenitrothion-deltamethrin cross-resistance conferred by esterases in Guatemalan Anopheles albimanus. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 1990;37:130–139. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandre F, Darriet F, Duchon S, Finot L, Manguin S, Carnevale P, Guillet P. Modifications of pyrethroid effects associated with kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2000;14:81–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christophides GK, Vlachou D, Kafatos FC. Comparative and functional genomics of the innate immune system in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Immunological Reviews. 2004;198:127–148. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crans WJ. Experimental infection of Anopheles gambiae and Culex pipiens fatigans with Wuchereria bancrofti in coastal East Africa. Journal of Medical Entomology. 1973;10:189–93. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/10.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enayati AA, Vatandoost H, Ladonni H, Townson H, Hemingway J. Molecular evidence for a kdr-like pyrethroid resistance mechanism in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2003;17:138–144. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Failloux AB, Raymond M, Ung A, Glaziou P, Martin PM, Pasteur N. Variation in the vector competence of Aedes polynesiensis for Wuchereria bancrofti. Parasitology. 1995;111:19–29. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000064568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferdig MT, Beerntsen BT, Spray FJ, Li J, Christensen BM. Reproductive costs associated with resistance in a mosquito-filarial worm system. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1993;49:756–762. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.49.756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hemingway J. Genetics of organophosphate and carbamate resistance in Anopheles atroparvus (Diptera: Culicidae) Journal of Economic Entomology. 1982;75:1055–8. doi: 10.1093/jee/75.6.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hemingway J. The molecular basis of two contrasting mechanisms of insecticide resistance. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2000;30:1009–1015. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(00)00079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hemingway J, Karunaratne SHPP. Mosquito carboxylesterases: a review of the molecular biology and biochemistry of a major insecticide resistance mechanism. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 1998;12:1–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00082.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hemingway J, Ranson H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annual Review of Entomology. 2000;45:369–389. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hemingway J, Coleman M, Paton MG, McCarroll L, Vaughan A, DeSilva D. Aldehyde oxidase is coamplified with the worlds most common Culex mosquito insecticide resistance-associated esterases. Insect Molecular Biology. 2000;9:93–99. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kraaijeveld AR, Godfrey HCJ. Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1997;389:278–280. doi: 10.1038/38483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar S, Christophides GK, Cantera R, Charles B, Han YS, Meister S, Dimopoulos G, Kafatos FC, Barillas-Mury C. The role of reactive oxygen species on plasmodium melanotic encapsulation in Anopheles gambiae. Proceedinga of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 2003;100:14139–14144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2036262100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCarroll L, Hemingway J. Can insecticide resistance status affect parasite transmission in mosquitoes? Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2002;32:1345–1351. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(02)00097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCarroll L, Paton MG, Karunaratne SHPP, Jayasuryia HTR, Kalpage KSP, Hemingway J. Insecticides and mosquito-borne disease. Nature. 2000;407:961–962. doi: 10.1038/35039671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McGreevy PB, Kolstrup N, Tao J, McCreevey MM, Marshall TF. Ingestion and development of Wucheria bancrofti in Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti after feeding on humans with varying densities of microfilaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1982;76:288–296. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90170-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nikou D, Ranson H, Hemingway J. An adult-specific CYP6P450 gene is overexpressed in a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. Gene. 2003;318:91–102. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00763-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ortelli F, Rossiter LC, Vontas J, Ranson H, Hemingway J. Heterologous expression of four glutathione transferase genes genetically linked to a major insecticide-resistance locus from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Biochemical Journal. 2003;373:957–963. doi: 10.1042/BJ20030169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Paton MG, Karunaratne SHPP, Giakoumaki E, Roberts N, Hemingway J. Quantitative analysis of gene amplification in insecticide-resistant Culex mosquitoes. Biochemical Journal. 2000;346:17–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Prapanthadara L, Hemingway J, Ketterman AJ. DDT resistance in Anopheles gambiae Giles from Zanzibar, Tanzania, based on increased DDT-dehydrochlorinase activity of glutathione S-transferases. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 1995;85:267–274. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ranson J, Jensen B, Wang X, Prapanthadara L, Hemingway J, Collins FH. Genetic mapping of two loci affecting DDT resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Insect Molecular Biology. 2000;9:499–507. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Raymond M, Callaghan A, Fort P, Pasteur N. Worldwide migration of amplified insecticide resistance genes in mosquitoes. Nature. 1991;350:151–153. doi: 10.1038/350151a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlein Y, Jacobson RL. Photosynthesis Modulates the Plant Feeding of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) Journal of Medical Entomology. 2000;37:319–324. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/37.3.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schlein Y, Jacobson RL. Hunger tolerance and Leishmania in sandflies. Nature. 2001;414:168. doi: 10.1038/35102679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Somboon P, Prapanthadara L, Suwonkerd W. Selection of Anopheles dirus for refractoriness and susceptibility to Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 1999;13:355–361. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vontas JG, Small GJ, Hemingway J. Glutathione S-transferases as antioxidant defence agents confer pyrethroid resistance in Nilaparvata lugens. Biochemical Journal. 2001;357:65–72. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vulule JM, Beach RF, Atieli FK, McAllister JC, Brogdon WG, Roberts JM, Mwangi RW, Hawley WA. Elevated oxidase and esterase levels associated with permethrin tolerance in Anopheles gambiae from Kenyan villages using permethrin-impregnated nets. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 1999;13:239–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. World Health Organization Building partnerships for lymphatic filariasis; Strategic plan September 1999. WHO/FIL. 1999;99:198. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yan G, Severson DW, Christensen BM. Costs and benefits of mosquito refractoriness to malaria parasites. Implications for genetic variability of mosquitoes and genetic control of malaria. Evolution. 1997;51:441–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES