Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1993 Nov;31(11):2851–2856. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2851-2856.1993

Comparison of quantitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay with culture methods and correlation with clinical disease.

M L Landry 1, D Ferguson 1
PMCID: PMC266143  PMID: 8263166

Abstract

Blood samples, obtained predominantly from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and solid-organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, were submitted to the clinical laboratory for detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and were processed by three methods: conventional culture, centrifugation culture, and CMV antigenemia assay with monoclonal antibodies (Clonab CMV; Biotest Diagnostic Corporation, Denville, N.J.) to CMV antigens. Of 496 blood samples tested, 107 were positive by one or more methods: 56 were positive by conventional culture, 27 were positive by centrifugation culture, and 97 were positive for CMV antigen (Ag) by the antigenemia assay. Forty-seven samples were positive by the CMV antigenemia assay only; in these samples, a mean of 12 Ag-positive cells was detected per 200,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes examined. In contrast, samples positive by the CMV antigenemia assay and both culture methods had a mean of 193 Ag-positive cells, and samples positive by the CMV antigenemia assay and conventional culture alone had a mean of 157 Ag-positive cells. In the antigenemia assay, paraformaldehyde fixation resulted in superior cell morphology when compared with acetone fixation. Use of immunofluorescence staining reduced sample processing time and the complexity of reagent preparation in comparison with immunoperoxidase staining. Differences in the sensitivities between the immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase staining techniques for detection of antigenemia were minor, with discrepant samples showing only one or two Ag-positive cells. Clinical disease was generally associated with high-level antigenemia, but exceptions were noted. The CMV antigenemia test is a rapid, quantitative assay that greatly facilitated the rapid diagnosis of CMV infection. However, quantitation of antigenemia is labor-intensive, requires processing of samples soon after collection, and does not always correlate with clinical disease in the individual patient.

Full text

PDF
2851

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boeckh M., Bowden R. A., Goodrich J. M., Pettinger M., Meyers J. D. Cytomegalovirus antigen detection in peripheral blood leukocytes after allogeneic marrow transplantation. Blood. 1992 Sep 1;80(5):1358–1364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buller R. S., Bailey T. C., Ettinger N. A., Keener M., Langlois T., Miller J. P., Storch G. A. Use of a modified shell vial technique to quantitate cytomegalovirus viremia in a population of solid-organ transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2620–2624. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2620-2624.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Erice A., Holm M. A., Gill P. C., Henry S., Dirksen C. L., Dunn D. L., Hillam R. P., Balfour H. H., Jr Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay is more sensitive than shell vial cultures for rapid detection of CMV in polymorphonuclear blood leukocytes. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2822–2825. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2822-2825.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerna G., Parea M., Percivalle E., Zipeto D., Silini E., Barbarini G., Milanesi G. Human cytomegalovirus viraemia in HIV-1-seropositive patients at various clinical stages of infection. AIDS. 1990 Oct;4(10):1027–1031. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199010000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerna G., Revello M. G., Percivalle E., Morini F. Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1232–1237. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1232-1237.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gleaves C. A., Hursh D. A., Meyers J. D. Detection of human cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens by centrifugation culture with a nonhuman cell line. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):1045–1048. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.1045-1048.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grefte J. M., van der Gun B. T., Schmolke S., van der Giessen M., van Son W. J., Plachter B., Jahn G., The T. H. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay: identification of the viral antigen as the lower matrix protein pp65. J Infect Dis. 1992 Sep;166(3):683–684. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.3.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller H., Rossier E., Milk R., Thomas C. Prospective study of cytomegalovirus antigenemia in allograft recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):1054–1055. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.1054-1055.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paya C. V., Wold A. D., Ilstrup D. M., Smith T. F. Evaluation of number of shell vial cell cultures per clinical specimen for rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Feb;26(2):198–200. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.198-200.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rabella N., Drew W. L. Comparison of conventional and shell vial cultures for detecting cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Apr;28(4):806–807. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.4.806-807.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wunderli W., Kägi M. K., Grüter E., Auracher J. D. Detection of cytomegalovirus in peripheral leukocytes by different methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Aug;27(8):1916–1917. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1916-1917.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Bij W., Schirm J., Torensma R., van Son W. J., Tegzess A. M., The T. H. Comparison between viremia and antigenemia for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Dec;26(12):2531–2535. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.12.2531-2535.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van der Bij W., Torensma R., van Son W. J., Anema J., Schirm J., Tegzess A. M., The T. H. Rapid immunodiagnosis of active cytomegalovirus infection by monoclonal antibody staining of blood leucocytes. J Med Virol. 1988 Jun;25(2):179–188. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890250208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. van der Giessen M., The T. H., van Son W. J. Cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2909–2910. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.12.2909-2910.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES