Abstract
Two new methods for typing Clostridium difficile, immunoblotting and plasmid fingerprinting, were compared with serotyping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Of these methods, immunoblotting was found to be the most valuable for use in a comprehensive typing system. More groups could be distinguished by immunoblotting than by serotyping or PAGE. Immunoblotting results were also more reproducible and distinctive than results by PAGE. Plasmid fingerprinting was an excellent marker for plasmid-bearing strains, but it had limited use because many isolates lacked plasmids. A unique plasmid profile observed for one group of isolates correlated with differences in phenotypic characteristics resolved by immunoblot analysis but not by serotyping or PAGE. Preliminary attempts to correlate typing results with pathogenicity of isolates were not successful but underscored the need for future studies to include careful assessment of the clinical significance of isolates.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1352d/1352d78cfed4723b4906f5f1138687b501efbb37" alt="41"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ea04/0ea042f136b93548e1ba5bd6aac71e2d1195eccb" alt="42"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a14ac/a14ac2700a3e18d4907d6fecc5ddeed1c1a6d487" alt="43"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4be9f/4be9f76dc41b452991cfb88772f1f97583046619" alt="44"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae3e5/ae3e579925477cc0d8eea12d5cb7ed2958c89629" alt="45"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7694/f7694a435a60b42e00056b17f45aba29c973023b" alt="46"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Birnboim H. C., Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 24;7(6):1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borriello S. P., Honour P. Concomitance of cytotoxigenic and non-cytotoxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):1006–1007. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.1006-1007.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdon D. W. Clostridium difficile: the epidemiology and prevention of hospital-acquired infection. Infection. 1982;10(4):203–204. doi: 10.1007/BF01666909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang T. W., Lauermann M., Bartlett J. G. Cytotoxicity assay in antibiotic-associated colitis. J Infect Dis. 1979 Nov;140(5):765–770. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.5.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmee M., Homel M., Wauters G. Serogrouping of Clostridium difficile strains by slide agglutination. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Mar;21(3):323–327. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.3.323-327.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmée M., Laroche Y., Avesani V., Cornelis G. Comparison of serogrouping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Dec;24(6):991–994. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.991-994.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George W. L., Sutter V. L., Citron D., Finegold S. M. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):214–219. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.214-219.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerding D. N., Olson M. M., Peterson L. R., Teasley D. G., Gebhard R. L., Schwartz M. L., Lee J. T., Jr Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis in adults. A prospective case-controlled epidemiologic study. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jan;146(1):95–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haslam S. C., Ketley J. M., Mitchell T. J., Stephen J., Burdon D. W., Candy D. C. Growth of Clostridium difficile and production of toxins A and B in complex and defined media. J Med Microbiol. 1986 Jun;21(4):293–297. doi: 10.1099/00222615-21-4-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heard S. R., O'Farrell S., Holland D., Crook S., Barnett M. J., Tabaqchali S. The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile with use of a typing scheme: nosocomial acquisition and cross-infection among immunocompromised patients. J Infect Dis. 1986 Jan;153(1):159–162. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heard S. R., Rasburn B., Matthews R. C., Tabaqchali S. Immunoblotting to demonstrate antigenic and immunogenic differences among nine standard strains of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):384–387. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.384-387.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyerly D. M., Wilkins T. D. Commercial latex test for Clostridium difficile toxin A does not detect toxin A. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Mar;23(3):622–623. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.622-623.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulligan M. E., Halebian S., Kwok R. Y., Cheng W. C., Finegold S. M., Anselmo C. R., Gerding D. N., Peterson L. R. Bacterial agglutination and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile. J Infect Dis. 1986 Feb;153(2):267–271. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.2.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Portnoy D. A., Moseley S. L., Falkow S. Characterization of plasmids and plasmid-associated determinants of Yersinia enterocolitica pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 1981 Feb;31(2):775–782. doi: 10.1128/iai.31.2.775-782.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poxton I. R., Aronsson B., Möllby R., Nord C. E., Collee J. G. Immunochemical fingerprinting of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from an outbreak of antibiotic-associated colitis and diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 1984 Jun;17(3):317–324. doi: 10.1099/00222615-17-3-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sell T. L., Schaberg D. R., Fekety F. R. Bacteriophage and bacteriocin typing scheme for Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):1148–1152. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.1148-1152.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toshniwal R., Silva J., Jr, Fekety R., Kim K. H. Studies on the epidemiology of colitis due to Clostridium difficile in hamsters. J Infect Dis. 1981 Jan;143(1):51–54. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsang V. C., Peralta J. M., Simons A. R. Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot techniques (EITB) for studying the specificities of antigens and antibodies separated by gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 1983;92:377–391. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)92032-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viscidi R., Willey S., Bartlett J. G. Isolation rates and toxigenic potential of Clostridium difficile isolates from various patient populations. Gastroenterology. 1981 Jul;81(1):5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson K. H., Sheagren J. N. Antagonism of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by nontoxigenic C. difficile. J Infect Dis. 1983 Apr;147(4):733–736. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.4.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wüst J., Sullivan N. M., Hardegger U., Wilkins T. D. Investigation of an outbreak of antibiotic-associated colitis by various typing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Dec;16(6):1096–1101. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.6.1096-1101.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]