Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1993 Nov;31(11):3068–3070. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3068-3070.1993

Detection of cholera toxin gene in stool specimens by polymerase chain reaction: comparison with bead enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and culture method for laboratory diagnosis of cholera.

T Ramamurthy 1, A Pal 1, P K Bag 1, S K Bhattacharya 1, G B Nair 1, H Kurozano 1, S Yamasaki 1, H Shirai 1, T Takeda 1, Y Uesaka 1, et al.
PMCID: PMC266223  PMID: 8263204

Abstract

Stool specimens obtained from 123 hospitalized patients with acute secretory diarrhea admitted to the Infectious Diseases Hospital, Calcutta, India, were examined for isolation of Vibrio cholerae O1 by direct or enrichment plating on selective media for cholera toxin (CT) by bead enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bead-ELISA) and for the CT gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). V. cholerae O1 was isolated either by direct culture or by enrichment culture from 70 stool specimens, all of which gave positive results by PCR. Eleven specimens which were culture negative and bead-ELISA positive also gave positive results by PCR. In addition, 13 more specimens which were negative by both the culture method and bead-ELISA, were positive by PCR. With the combined results of both the culture method and the CT bead-ELISA, a confirmed laboratory diagnosis of cholera could be made from 81 stool specimens, while the combined results of the three methods, including PCR, yielded a positive result for 94 specimens examined. From these data, we conclude that PCR provides a more sensitive and specific assay for rapid diagnosis of cholera than currently available methods.

Full text

PDF
3068

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brian M. J., Frosolono M., Murray B. E., Miranda A., Lopez E. L., Gomez H. F., Cleary T. G. Polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection and hemolytic-uremic syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1801–1806. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1801-1806.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Germani Y., Guesdon J. L., Phalente L., Begaud E., Moreau J. P. Comparison of two GM1-erythrocyte assays to detect heat-labile Escherichia coli enterotoxin in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):995–999. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.995-999.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Merson M. H., Yolken R. H., Sack R. B., Froehlich J. L., Greenberg H. B., Huq I., Black R. W. Detection of Escherichia coli enterotoxins in stools. Infect Immun. 1980 Jul;29(1):108–113. doi: 10.1128/iai.29.1.108-113.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morgan D. R., DuPont H. L., Wood L. V., Ericsson C. D. Comparison of methods to detect Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin in stool and cell-free culture supernatants. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):798–802. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.798-802.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramamurthy T., Bhattacharya S. K., Uesaka Y., Horigome K., Paul M., Sen D., Pal S. C., Takeda T., Takeda Y., Nair G. B. Evaluation of the bead enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of cholera toxin directly from stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1783–1786. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1783-1786.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramamurthy T., Pal A., Nair G. B., Pal S. C., Takeda T., Takeda Y. Experience with toxin bead ELISA in cholera outbreak. Lancet. 1990 Aug 11;336(8711):375–376. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91917-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shirai H., Nishibuchi M., Ramamurthy T., Bhattacharya S. K., Pal S. C., Takeda Y. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of the cholera enterotoxin operon of Vibrio cholerae. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2517–2521. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2517-2521.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Svennerholm A. M., Wiklund G. Rapid GM1-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with visual reading for identification of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Apr;17(4):596–600. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.4.596-600.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Uesaka Y., Otsuka Y., Kashida M., Oku Y., Horigome K., Nair G. B., Pal S. C., Yamasaki S., Takeda Y. Detection of cholera toxin by a highly sensitive bead-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Microbiol Immunol. 1992;36(1):43–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1992.tb01641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wachsmuth I. K., Bopp C. A., Fields P. I., Carrillo C. Difference between toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 from South America and US gulf coast. Lancet. 1991 May 4;337(8749):1097–1098. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91744-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilde J., Eiden J., Yolken R. Removal of inhibitory substances from human fecal specimens for detection of group A rotaviruses by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reactions. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1300–1307. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1300-1307.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES