Abstract
Signaling via interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interleukin-9 receptors (IL-2R and IL-9R) involves heteromeric interactions between specific interleukin receptor subunits, which bind Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and the JAK3 binding common γ chain (γc). The potential existence and roles of homomeric and heteromeric complexes before ligand binding and their modulation by ligand and JAK3 are unclear. Using computerized antibody-mediated immunofluorescence co-patching of epitope-tagged receptors at the surface of live cells, we demonstrate that IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, and γc each display a significant fraction of ligand-independent homomeric complexes (24-28% co-patching), whereas control co-patching levels with unrelated receptors are very low (7%). Heteromeric complex formation of IL2-Rβ or IL-9Rα with γc is also observed in the absence of ligand (15-30%). Ligand binding increases this hetero-oligomerization 2-fold but does not affect homo-oligomerization. Co-expression of IL-2Rα does not affect the hetero-oligomerization of IL-2Rβ and γc. Recruitment of γc into heterocomplexes is partly at the expense of its homo-oligomerization, suggesting that a functional role of the latter may be to keep the receptors inactive in the absence of ligand. At the same time, the preformed complexes between γc and IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα promote signaling by the JAK3 A572V mutant without ligand, supporting a pathophysiological role for the constitutive oligomerization in triggering ligand-independent activation of JAK3 (and perhaps other JAK mutants) mutants identified in several human cancers.
Interleukin-2 and -9 (IL-2 and IL-9)6 signaling pathways and receptors (IL-2R and IL-9R) are of high medical relevance in view of their important roles in the immune response and the frequent involvement of their loss or mutation in immunodeficiency and pathological autoimmune conditions (1-5). IL-2 is critically involved in regulating T cell proliferation (6). Loss of IL-2 (3), IL-2Rα (4), IL-2Rβ (5), or of the STAT5 transcription factor (2, 7) results in autoimmune diseases due to ineffective induction of anergy in peripheral T cells. IL-9 is known to induce proliferation and differentiation of mast cells as well as stimulation of murine T cell lymphomas (1). It also stimulates the proliferation of the B1 subset of B lymphocytes and of erythroid progenitors (8) and has been implicated in the induction of certain forms of asthma (9).
IL-2 and IL-9 act through binding to specific cell-surface receptors. The high affinity IL-2R is comprised of three separate chains, termed α (CD25), β (CD122), and γ (γc, CD132), which is a Janus tyrosine kinase 3 (JAK3)-interacting chain common to many cytokine receptors, including IL-2 and IL-9 receptors (10-15). IL-2Rα by itself has only low affinity to IL-2 and is not directly involved in signal transduction (16). On the other hand, in the absence of IL-2Rα, the IL-2Rβ/γc heterocomplex is sufficient to support IL-2 binding and signaling (17, 18). We, therefore, focused on the interactions of the latter subunits. In contrast, the IL-9R has only one ligand binding chain (designated IL-9Rα), which interacts with γc for signaling via activation of JAK3 (8, 19-21). Thus, the lack of a “modulatory” chain equivalent to IL-2Rα makes it interesting to compare the interactions between the subunits of the IL-9R and those of the IL-2R system.
Complex formation among the subunits of these receptors is an essential feature of their signaling, as they function as heteromeric complexes between the ligand binding receptor chain and the common γc that recruits JAK3 to the complex (20-22). Early fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based studies were conducted on IL-2R but not on IL-9R. In that study (23) the existence of preassembled heterocomplexes between α/β, β/γc, or α/γc of the IL-2R, which were modulated by ligand binding, was reported. However, the experiments were conducted mostly on cells expressing a high excess of IL-2Rα over the other subunits and did not explore homomeric complexes. Recent crystallographic studies on the quaternary structure of the soluble ectodomains of IL-2R subunits suggested that IL-2 first binds to IL-2Rα, enhancing IL-2 binding to IL-2Rβ, followed by recruitment of γc to the IL-2/IL-2Rβ complex (14, 15).
Despite the functional importance of IL-2R and IL-9R oligomerization, many aspects of the interaction between the subunits comprising these receptors and their potential modulation by ligand binding and/or JAK1 and JAK3 are still unclear, especially in their native milieu (the plasma membrane of live cells). We tackled these questions by combining computerized immunofluorescence co-patching (24, 25) to quantify both homomeric and heteromeric complex formation of IL-2R and IL-9R subunits with signaling assays in live cells. Our data demonstrate that the signaling subunits of both receptors (IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, and γc) display a subpopulation of preassembled homomeric complexes, which is not altered by ligand. On the other hand, hetero-oligomerization of both IL-2Rβ and IL-9Rα with γc existed before ligand binding but was significantly augmented by the relevant ligands, and IL-2Rβ/γc complex formation was insensitive to co-expression of IL-2R. The hetero-oligomerization of IL-2 and IL-9 receptor subunits with γc, even in the presence of JAK3, did not result in activation unless ligand was present, suggesting that oligomerization per se does not suffice for activation. However, we hypothesized that such preformed complexes could serve as scaffolds for activation of mutated JAK proteins, such as those recently described for JAK1 (26) and JAK3 (27). Indeed, we show that preformed complexes of IL-2Rβ or IL9Rα and γc support signaling by the constitutively active JAK3 A572V.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Culture—BOSC23 cells (derived from HEK293T cells and expressing the gag, pol, and env proteins of the Moloney leukemia ecotropic virus (28)) and HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum (Biological Industries Beit Haemek or Invitrogen) as described (29, 30). Ba/F3 cells (IL-3-dependent mouse pro-B cells) were maintained and transduced as described (31). BETT cells (human T-ALL cells) were maintained in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal calf serum.
Plasmids and Recombinant Virus Vectors—The human IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, and γc cDNAs were cloned in the pMX-IRES-GFP1.1 retroviral vector (32). The cDNAs encoding these proteins were cloned upstream of the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) followed by a GFP construct, such that transfection can be monitored by low level expression (at a level that does not interfere with regular immunofluorescence studies) of GFP (32, 33). Each construct was tagged extracellularly with either the 12CA5 influenza hemagglutinin (HA) tag (YPYDVPDYA) or the 9E10 Myc tag (EQKLISEEDL), with tags being introduced downstream of the predicted signal sequence cleavage site as described earlier (30). Thus, in IL-2Rβ the tags were inserted between residues Thr-31 and Ser-32, in IL-9Rα between residues Gln-26 and Gly-27 (designating the Met followed immediately by the signal sequence as 1, where the actual translation starts), and in γc between residues Ile-27—Leu-28. IL-2Rα cDNA (untagged) and human wild-type or JAK3 A572V mutant cDNAs were subcloned in pREX-IRES-CD4 (34). FLAG-tagged murine thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) containing the IL-7R signal sequence (35) was cloned in pMX-IRES-GFP1.1 (30). Myc-tagged type II transforming growth factor-β (TβRII) in pcDNA3 was described (36).
Generation of Stable Cell Lines—High titer replication-defective retroviral supernatants were generated from BOSC23 cells (serving as a packaging cell line) after transfection with the retroviral bicistronic vectors encoding the constructs mentioned above as described (32). The viruses thus produced were used to transduce Ba/F3 cells by centrifugation in the presence of 4 μg/ml Polybrene (Sigma). The efficiency of infection was usually 40-50%. Populations of cells expressing the GFP marker above a predetermined level (top 10%) were isolated by FACS sorting.
Immunofluorescence Co-patching—BOSC23 cells were plated on glass coverslips in 6-well dishes (2 × 105 cells/dish). After 24 h, they were co-transfected with the different epitope-tagged IL-R subunits at various combinations using 1 μg of DNA of each construct complemented to 6 μg by empty vector. In some cases expression vectors for untagged IL-9Rα, IL-2Rβ, or IL-2Rα were also included (see Fig. 3 legend). Experiments were performed 44-48 h after transfection with calcium phosphate (Sigma). To measure receptor oligomerization, we employed antibody-mediated immunofluorescence co-patching (24, 37). Cells expressing pairs of receptors carrying different epitope tags (e.g. Myc-IL-9Rα together with HA-IL-9Rα) were washed twice with serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and incubated 30 min at 37 °C to allow digestion of serum-derived ligands. After washing twice with cold Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) supplemented with 20 mm Hepes (pH 7.4) and 2% BSA (HBSS/Hepes/BSA; all from Sigma), the cells were incubated with normal goat γ globulin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories; 200 μg/ml, 30 min, 4 °C) to block nonspecific binding. This was followed by successive incubation in the cold (to avoid internalization) in HBSS/Hepes/BSA with primary anti-tag IgGs (20 μg/ml each, 45 min); that is, rabbit HA.11 against the HA tag (anti-HA) together with 9E10 mouse anti-Myc (both from Covance Research Products) followed by labeling/patching with secondary Alexa594-goat anti-rabbit and Alexa488-goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes; 20 μg/ml each, 30 min, 4 °C). In some control experiments using a FLAG-tagged construct, mouse anti-FLAG IgG (M2; Sigma) was employed. The cells were washed and fixed in methanol (5 min, -20 °C) and acetone (3 min, -20 °C) and mounted in Prolong Antifade (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes). In experiments where ligands were present, human IL-9 (750 units/ml; produced in baculovirus as described in Renauld et al. (38)) or IL-2 (500 units/ml; Sigma) was added at 4 °C 30 min before labeling with IgGs and maintained during all subsequent incubations. For Ba/F3 cells, a similar protocol was employed, except that incubations with IgGs were carried out on cells in 100 μl of suspension. For washing, Ba/F3 cells were centrifuged for 1 min and resuspended in 100 μl of HBSS/Hepes/BSA. After antibody labeling, the Ba/F3 cells were mounted onto poly-l-lysine-coated coverslips using cytospin centrifuge (5 min, medium speed) as described (34) followed by fixation in methanol and acetone.
FIGURE 3.
Quantification of the co-patching experiments between the different IL-R subunits. Co-patching experiments were conducted as in Fig. 1 (homo-oligomerization) and in Fig. 2 (heteromeric co-patching) on cells co-expressing two differently tagged versions of IL-R subunits. Regions of interest were counted on 20 cells per sample, counting the numbers of red (R), green (G), and overlapping (yellow, Y) patches by Image-Pro as described in Figs. 1 and 2. The % co-patching (% of a receptor carrying a given tag in mutual patches with a receptor carrying another tag) is given by 100 × [Y/(Y + R)] or 100 × [Y/(Y + G)] for the red- and green-labeled receptors, respectively. Because these values were very close, only one mean ± S.E. value is depicted for each pair. The randomized control co-patching (15-17%) for each pair was subtracted. A, IL-2 and IL-9 selectively enhance γc heteromeric co-patching with IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα. Homomeric co-patching was measured on cells co-transfected by pairs of vectors encoding HA- and Myc-tagged versions of the same IL-R subunits. Heteromeric co-patching was measured between HA-IL-2Rβ or HA-IL-9Rα and Myc-γc. To measure the potential effect of IL-2Rα, expression vector encoding untagged IL-2Rα was included at a 4-fold excess over the vectors encoding HA-IL-2Rβ and Myc-γc (middle pair of bars of heteromeric complexes). Control experiments for co-patching between an IL-R subunit (HA-IL-9Rα) and an unrelated receptor (Myc-TβRII or FLAG-TpoR) are shown on the right; similar results (not shown) were obtained with HA-IL-2Rβ. Incubation with ligands (IL-2 or IL-9) was as in Fig. 2. Asterisks indicate a significant increase in the level of co-patching upon the addition of ligand (**, p < 2 × 10-4, Student's t test). B, co-expression with IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα reduces the homomeric co-patching of γc. HA-γc and Myc-γc were co-expressed with or without a 4-fold excess of untagged IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα. Asterisks indicate a significant reduction in the homomeric co-patching of γc (**, p < 3 × 10-4).
Fluorescence digital images were recorded using a CCD camera as described (25). The Alexa488 (green) and Alexa594 (red) images were exported in TIFF format to Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics) and subjected to quantitative analysis of the extent of co-patching using an algorithm we have recently developed (25). Briefly, the program segments the patches in a user-defined region of interest, subtracts the background, and identifies the center of each object in the green and red images. This is followed by nearest-neighbor analysis, calculating the distances from the center of green patch to that of the nearest red patch (and vice versa). Patches whose nearest neighbor is within one optical resolution unit (up to 0.2 μm) are considered colocalized (25). The % co-patching of e.g. green with red patches is given by dividing the number of the green patches colocalized with red patches by the total number of green patches. 20-25 cells were analyzed in each case.
Dual-luciferase Reporter Assay—HEK293 cells grown in 24-well plates were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with vectors encoding the IL-R ligand binding subunits and γc as well as wild-type or mutant JAK3 A572V where indicated (200 ng DNA/well each vector, replacing JAK3 vector with empty vector in controls). To test for STAT transcriptional activation, the STAT3-responsive or STAT5-responsive luciferase constructs (250 ng/well) were co-transfected into the cells together with 100 ng/well of a control vector (pRL-TK, expressing constitutively active Renilla luciferase; Promega) to calibrate for transfection efficiency. STAT5-mediated transcription was evaluated with the pLHRE-luc reporter gene constructs harboring tandem copies of the STAT5-inducible lactogenic hormone response element (LHRE) of the rat β-casein gene promoter, inserted upstream a luciferase gene (39). STAT3-mediated transcription was evaluated with pGL3-pap1-luc plasmid containing the luciferase gene under the control of the STAT3-inducible rat Pap1 (pancreatitis-associated protein-1) promoter (40). After 4 h the cells were stimulated with 100 units/ml IL-2 or 100 units/ml IL-9 for 20 h and lysed with passive lysis buffer as described (31). Firefly (STAT reporter) and Renilla (control vector) luciferase activities were measured with the dual-luciferase reporter kit (Promega). To normalize for transfection efficiency, the results of firefly luciferase activity were divided by those of the respective Renilla luciferase activity.
FACS Analysis—BETT (T-ALL) cells or Ba/F3 cells expressing HA-tagged human IL-2Rβ and Myc-tagged human γc were washed in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% fetal calf serum. 3 × 105 cells were stained by monoclonal anti-human IL-2Rβ (R&D systems) or anti-human γc (BD Biosciences) antibody coupled with phycoerythrin, according to manufacturer's recommendations (1 h, 4 °C). These antibodies detect both untagged endogenous receptor subunits and transduced tagged receptors and, thus, provide a means to compare cell surface levels. After washing by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were resuspended in 200 μl of PBS with 0.1% fetal calf serum, and cell surface expression of human IL-2Rβ and human γc was analyzed on 104 cells by a BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). An aliquot of non-stained cells was used as autofluorescence control. We employed quantitative fluorescence cytometry to measure absolute levels of receptors at the cell surface expressed as molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF values). To the obtained MESF values Sphero Rainbow Calibration particles were used to calibrate the flow cytometer scale. The mean/median relative fluorescence intensity channel value for each bead population was calculated using Cell Quest software. A calibration curve was constructed, and subsequent data from the analyzed samples obtained from mean/median relative fluorescence intensity were converted to MESF for each antibody. All data were corrected for autofluorescence quantified in the same way.
RESULTS
Cell-surface IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, and γc Form Ligand-independent Homomeric Complexes—In view of the proposed importance of the oligomeric state of IL-2 and IL-9 receptors for their activation, we conducted experiments to determine whether the ligand binding chains of these receptors (IL-2Rβ and IL-9Rα) form stable homo-oligomers before ligand binding or only in the presence of ligand (ligand-induced oligomerization). To detect the formation of homomeric complexes of the intact receptor chains in their natural environment (the plasma membrane of live cells), we employed a computerized digital analysis version of immunofluorescence co-patching (Ref. 25; see “Experimental Procedures”). This method, which we have formerly used to demonstrate homo- and hetero-oligomerization of several transmembrane receptors (24, 30, 41), is based on the expression at the surface of live cells of two receptors tagged with different epitope tags at their extracellular termini. One receptor is forced into micropatches by a double layer of bivalent IgGs using a fluorescent (e.g. green) secondary IgG. The co-expressed receptor, which carries a different epitope tag, is patched/labeled by anti-tag primary IgG from another species and secondary antibodies coupled to another fluorophore (red). Receptors in mutual oligomers are swept into mutual micropatches, which appear yellow when the two images are overlapped. To measure the homo-oligomerization of IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, or γc, we co-expressed Myc and HA-tagged versions of each protein in BOSC23 cells and subjected them to immunofluorescence co-patching studies in the absence or presence of ligand. Co-patching was determined by algorithms written for Image-Pro Plus, defining green and red patches as overlapping if their intensity peaks were separated by less than 0.2 μm (25). To evaluate the level of random co-patching (uncorrelated overlap of patches) in the same image (which depends on the surface density of the patches), a “randomized” region of interest was created by overlaying the green image of a given region of interest upon the red image of an identically sized neighboring region (see Fig. 1, C and G). This way, any co-localization reflects random overlap of patches due to their finite density at the cell surface. These randomized values can then be subtracted to obtain the actual co-patching (% co-patching). Typical images showing the co-patching between differently tagged forms of the same receptor chain (IL-9Rα or IL-2Rβ) in the absence of ligand are shown in Fig. 1. Similar experiments were conducted in the presence of IL-2 or IL-9. Quantitative average data derived from many such experiments with IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, or γc both in the absence and presence of ligands are depicted in Fig. 3A. These studies demonstrate that 23-29% of each of the receptor subunits examined are already co-patched in the absence of ligand. It should be noted that if one assumes that the homo oligomers are dimeric, the percentage of homodimerization is higher than the percentage of co-patching by a factor of 3/2; as discussed by us earlier (30, 37), this occurs because homodimers containing identically tagged receptors may form but would not be swept into mutual patches. Interestingly, for all the receptor subunits examined, the homo-oligomerization did not increase significantly upon ligand binding. In control experiments (an HA-tagged IL-R chain co-expressed with an unrelated receptor-Myc-TβRII or FLAG-TpoR) the co-patching level was very low (5-10%; Fig. 3A).
FIGURE 1.
Typical immunofluorescence co-patching images of homomeric complex formation between IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα subunits in the absence of ligand. BOSC23 cells were co-transfected with pairs of pMX-IRES-GFP1.1 expression vectors encoding HA- and Myc-tagged versions of IL-9Rα or IL-2Rβ. After 44-48 h, live cells were labeled consecutively in the cold by a series of antibodies to mediate patching and fluorescent labeling, as described under “Experimental Procedures.” The patching/labeling protocol resulted in Alexa 594-labeled HA-tagged receptors (red fluorescent patches) and Alexa 488-labeled Myc-tagged receptors (green patches). A and E, typical images of cells subjected to co-patching. The white borders depict regions of interest that were analyzed for co-patching (panels B and F) and for randomized co-localization (panels C and G). Bars, 10 μmin panels A and E and 2 μmin panels B, C, F, and G. B and F, zoomed images of region I in panels A and E, respectively. Using an algorithm written for Image-Pro Plus, a green and red patch were defined as overlapping (co-patched) if their centers were separated by less than 0.2 μm (25). C and G, zoomed randomized images to evaluate random overlap between the red and green patches (control for occasional overlap due to finite density of patches). Random images were created from two adjacent regions of interest by merging the green channel of region I with the unrelated red channel of region II. D and H, computer analysis results of the specific images shown for total and randomized % co-patching of IL-2Rβ (panel D) or IL-9Rα (panel H).
Hetero-oligomers of IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα with γc Form before Ligand Binding and Are Enhanced by Ligand—Because IL-2 and IL-9 signal transduction is mediated via hetero-oligomerization between the ligand binding chain and γc in the presence of ligand (8, 17-19), we proceeded to measure the hetero-oligomerization of IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα with the common γc chain. BOSC23 cells were co-transfected by HA-IL-9Rα or HA-IL-2Rβ together with Myc-γc. The cells were then subjected to immunofluorescence co-patching studies as in Fig. 1 in the presence or absence of the respective ligands. Fig. 2 shows representative results of co-patching experiments obtained for HA-IL-9Rα heterocomplex formation with γc; analogous results were obtained for the association of HA-IL-2Rβ with γc. The average data of many such experiments are summarized in Fig. 3A. As shown in these figures, both IL-2Rβ and IL-9Rα had a subpopulation of receptors (15% for IL-2Rβ, 25% for IL-9Rα) residing in preformed heteromeric complexes with γc before ligand binding. However, unlike the situation encountered for homodimerization of the ligand binding subunits, the addition of the respective ligands enhanced the heterodimerization measured on live cells by nearly 100%, demonstrating ligand-mediated heterocomplex formation.
FIGURE 2.
Representative immunofluorescence co-patching images showing heterocomplex formation between IL-9Rα and γc. The experiments were conducted as in Fig. 1 on cells co-expressing HA-IL-9Rα and Myc-γc. The IgG labeling/patching protocol resulted in HA-IL-9Rα in red patches and Myc-γc in green patches. A and E, typical images of cells subjected to co-patching in the absence (panel A) or presence (panel E) of IL-9. In the latter case the ligand (750 units/ml) was added for 30 min at 4 °C before antibody labeling and maintained during all subsequent incubations. The white borders depict regions of interest that were analyzed for co-patching (panels B and F) and for randomized co-localization (panels C and G). Bars, 10 μmin panels A and E and 2 μmin panels B, C, F, and G. B and F, zoomed images of region I in panels A and E, respectively, processed for co-patching by Image-Pro Plus as described in Fig. 1. C and G, zoomed randomized images to evaluate random overlap between red and green patches, constructed from the green channel of region I and the unrelated red channel of region II. D and H, computer analysis results of the specific images in the absence (B and C; shown in panel D) or presence (F and G; shown in panel H) of ligand.
In view of the role IL-2Rα chain has in enhancing ligand binding to IL-2Rβ, we also examined whether overexpression of IL-2Rα enhances IL-2Rβ/γc hetero-oligomerization. As shown in Fig. 3A, no significant effects were observed either in the absence or presence of ligand, suggesting that the basic interactions between IL-2Rβ and γc are largely unaffected.
A large fraction of the purified γc ectodomain was reported to exist in homo-oligomers, which were proposed to dissociate during its association into heterocomplexes with the other IL-2R chains (15). We, therefore, examined in our system whether co-expression with untagged IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα reduces the level of homomeric γc complexes. As shown in Fig. 3B, co-expression with either IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα significantly reduced the co-patching levels of HA-γc/Myc-γc (from 28 to 17-18%), suggesting that association of γc into heterocomplexes is indeed at the expense of its homo-oligomerization.
Oligomerization Results Are Confirmed in Hematopoietic Cells Stably Expressing Near-physiologic Levels of Tagged Receptor Subunits—The results in Fig. 3 were obtained in experiments on transiently expressing BOSC23 cells. Although the receptor expression levels are not very high due to the use of retroviral vectors, which harbor relatively weak promoters, they still represent overexpression as compared with the endogenous levels of the receptor subunits. To test whether some or all of the heteromeric complexes measured under these conditions are assembled due to overexpression, we prepared stable cell lines expressing tagged receptors. We have chosen the murine pro-B cell line Ba/F3 (42) and infected them with replication-defective retroviruses encoding the different epitope-tagged receptor chains ((33) see “Experimental Procedures”). In this manner we have created Ba/F3 cell lines stably co-expressing HA-IL-9Rα or IL-2Rβ together with Myc-tagged γc. These cells were subjected along with T-ALL cells that express endogenous receptors to FACS analysis for determining their cell surface levels of tagged receptors by using antibodies directed to the amino terminus of the receptors. The FACS analysis showed that for IL-2Rβ and for γc the tagged receptors were localized at the cell surface at levels within the same range to those normally expressed by the human T-ALL BETT cells, with γc being lower and IL-2Rβ being higher but within the same level of magnitude (Figs. 4, A and B). The stably transduced Ba/F3 cells were then subjected to immunofluorescence co-patching experiments in the absence or presence of ligands (IL-2 or IL-9). The results (Fig. 4C) were rather similar to those obtained in the transient expression experiments on BOSC23 cells, showing an even higher level of heteromeric co-patching for IL-2Rβ/γc and a somewhat lower (but still significant) level for IL-9Rα/γc co-patching. This suggests that the basic phenomenon, namely a certain degree of pre-existing hetero-oligomerization, which significantly increases upon ligand binding, is reproducible in stable cell lines and is not due to excessive overexpression.
FIGURE 4.
Heteromeric co-patching of IL-2Rβ and IL-9Rα with γc in stably expressing Ba/F3 cells. A and B, comparative cell surface localization of γc and IL2-Rβ between Ba/F3 cells stably transduced with Myc-γc or HA-IL2-Rβ and human T-ALL BETT cells expressing endogenous γc and IL-2Rβ chains. Cell surface localization of the respective chains was detected by FACS using antibodies recognizing the amino terminus region of γc (A) or of IL-2Rβ (B). Cell surface fluorescence was analyzed on 104 cells by a BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Quantitative fluorescence cytometry was employed to measure absolute levels of receptors at the cell surface expressed as MESF values, as described under “Experimental Procedures.” C, co-patching experiments. Ba/F3 cells stably expressing HA-IL-2Rβ or HA-IL-9Rα together with Myc-γc were subjected to co-patching experiments in the presence or absence of ligands, as described in Fig. 3. Bars, mean ± S.E. of experiments on 20 cells in each case. Asterisks indicate a significant increase in the level of co-patching upon the addition of ligand (*, p < 0.04; **, p < 1 × 10-4).
Preformed Oligomers of IL-9Rα or IL-2Rβ and γc Promote Signaling by Constitutively Active JAK3 A572 Mutant—Cytokine receptors lack intrinsic enzymatic activity and use cytosolic JAK proteins to phosphorylate tyrosines on the cytokine receptors themselves, STAT proteins, and additional proteins involved in signaling (43). This induces transcriptional activation of many genes (44, 45). JAK3 is recruited to interleukin receptor complexes via γc (20-22). We compared signaling by IL-2 and IL-9 receptor complexes in the presence and absence of JAK3 and the constitutively active JAK3 A572V mutant, which was recently described to be oncogenic and constitutively active (27). We co-transfected HEK293 cells (which are devoid of JAK3 but express the ubiquitous JAK1) with various combinations of cDNAs coding for JAK3, the ligand binding chains, and γc. To measure STAT transcriptional activation, two luciferase reporter constructs were included, one responsive mainly to STAT3 (pGL3-pap1-luc) and the other to STAT5 (pLHRE-luc), as well as the constitutively active Renilla luciferase plasmid pRL-TK). As shown in Fig. 5, A and B, JAK3 co-expression was necessary for transcriptional activation response to either IL-2 or IL-9; co-expression of the receptors in the absence of JAK3 was not sufficient to produce increased signaling unless JAK3 was also expressed. Signaling by IL-2 and IL-9 was marginally increased by providing extra-JAK1 to the endogenous levels in these cells, whereas under these conditions there was no detectable signaling in the absence of ligands (co-expression of specific chains, γc, JAK1, and JAK3 (empty bars, right-most columns of Fig. 5, A and B).
FIGURE 5.
Luciferase transcriptional activation assay demonstrating that JAK3 expression is required for IL-2 and IL-9 response and that preformed heteromeric complexes promote constitutive signaling by JAK3 A572V. HEK293 cells, which do not express endogenous JAK3, were co-transfected with pMX-IRES-GFP1.1 vectors encoding HA-tagged IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα in various combinations with HA-γc, JAK3, JAK1, JAK3 A572V, the STAT-responsive luciferase reporter vectors pGL3-pap1-luc (for STAT3 in the case of IL-9Rα, panel C), pLHRE-luc (for STAT5 in the case of IL-2Rβ, panel D), and the pRL-TK constitutively active Renilla luciferase vector. A and B, 4 h post-transcription, the cells were incubated overnight with ligands (solid bars) or with vehicle control (empty bars) and subjected to luciferase assays (“Experimental Procedures”). Results are the mean ± variation of duplicate samples, which are representative of three independent experiments. C and D, HEK293 cells were transfected with cDNA coding for HA-tagged IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα in various combinations with HA-γc along with cDNAs coding for JAK3 (empty bars), JAK3 A572V (solid bars), and when indicated the cDNA coding for JAK1. Shown are the means ± S.E. of two experiments, each performed in duplicate. C, *, p < 0.02; **, p < 3 × 10-4. D, **, p < 0.04; **, p < 3 × 10-4 (indicate a significant increase in the luciferase activity).
We the tested the effect of replacing JAK3 with the constitutively active A572V mutant. Like JAK2 V617F, which contains an intact FERM domain and which requires interaction with cytokine receptors for signaling, JAK3 A572V is predicted to interact with γc. In Fig. 5, C and D, we show that co-expression of JAK3 A572V with specific chains and JAK1 leads to significant constitutive signaling both in the case of IL-2Rβ and γc and IL-9Rα and γc complexes. Interestingly, preformed heteromeric complexes are required for constitutive signaling by JAK3 A572V, as no transcriptional activity was detected when only specific chains or only γc were expressed. These data suggest that preformed heteromeric oligomerization might provide an important support for mutated JAKs to induce signaling in the absence of ligand.
DISCUSSION
In the studies reported here we investigated homomeric and heteromeric complex formation among IL-2 or IL-9 receptor chains situated at the plasma membrane of intact cells. Our key finding is that all the IL-R subunits examined (IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, and γc) display a fraction of homomeric complexes at the cell surface independent of ligand binding. Heteromeric complexes between IL-9Rα or IL-2Rβ and γc are also formed in the absence of ligand, but unlike the insensitivity of the homomeric complexes to ligand, heteromeric complex formation was increased by 100% after ligand binding. The latter findings in transiently transfected BOSC23 cells were also validated in Ba/F3 cells stably expressing near-physiologic levels of tagged IL-R subunits. Importantly, the need for ligand binding to activate even the preformed heteromeric complexes of IL-2Rα or IL-9Rβ with γc suggests that the oligomeric interfaces between IL-9Rα or IL-2Rβ and γc must differ between the unliganded and liganded receptor complexes. Although strictly inactive, we propose that the preformed heteromeric complexes may act to prime signaling by low levels of ligands. This is reminiscent of the case of the erythropoietin receptor, where preformed dimers were also detected by immunofluorescence co-patching (30, 37) and by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (46). These preformed dimers require a conformational change for activation (47) in order to impose a productive dimeric interface necessary to activate JAK2.
The immunofluorescence co-patching studies on homo-oligomerization (Figs. 1 and 3) demonstrate that significant fractions of IL-2Rβ, IL-9Rα, or γc reside in homomeric complexes before ligand binding. The co-patching observed for the homomeric interactions of each chain was rather similar (23-29%; Figs. 1 and 3). As discussed earlier (30, 37), the % co-patching is identical to the percentage of dimerization in the case of heterodimers (where each interacting chain is necessarily labeled by a different tag) but not in the case of homo-oligomers. Thus, for a pure homodimeric population, the statistical prediction is for 66.6% (2/3) co-patching, as homodimers containing identically tagged chains may also form but would not be swept into mutual patches with similar chains carrying the other tag. For a homodimer, the fraction of “same tag” complexes is 1/3, leaving 2/3 as differently tagged dimers. Thus, 23-29% co-patching would actually reflect a proportion of 37-44% of receptor chains in homodimers. This level is significant, especially because it is obtained after the subtraction of the randomized co-localization of patches, which is enabled by the new computerized approach.
Importantly, for all the above receptor chains, the homomeric co-patching levels were not affected by ligands (IL-2 or IL-9), demonstrating that the homomeric complexes are ligand-independent. This situation is different from that reported for the epidermal growth factor receptor, where dimerization is ligand-dependent (48). However, it is in accord with earlier reports by us and by others, where the unliganded erythropoietin receptors were found to form homodimers at high efficiency (30, 47, 49, 51). Moreover, our present finding that a significant fraction of γc is in homo-oligomers (Fig. 3) is in accord with a recent report that the purified ectodomain of γc forms homo-oligomers, which may dissociate and incorporate into heteromeric signaling complexes upon incubation with the other IL-2 receptor chains in the presence of ligand (15). Indeed, co-expression with IL-2Rβ or IL-9Rα reduced the homo-oligomerization of γc (Fig. 3B), suggesting that the formation of heteromeric signaling complexes is at the expense of γc homo-oligomerization. Because heterocomplex formation is selectively increased in the presence of ligand (see below), γc homo-oligomerization may serve a physiological role by reducing the potential for activation in the absence of ligand.
A different picture was observed for the heteromeric association of IL-2Rβ and IL-9Rα with γc. Although detectable levels of heteromeric complexes were also observed before ligand binding both in transiently expressing BOSC23 cells and in stably expressing Ba/F3 cells (Figs. 2, 3, 4), the effect of ligand was strikingly different, inducing a significant increase (2-fold) in the percentage of heteromeric co-patching. This suggests that the binding of IL-2 or IL-9 to their respective ligand-binding subunits results in ligand-mediated increase in the association of these subunits with γc. These findings, obtained on full-length receptor chains situated at the plasma membrane of live cells, are in agreement with crystallographic studies on the quaternary structure of IL-2 in complex with IL-2Rα, IL-2Rβ, and γc (14, 15), where a large IL-2Rβ/γc interface was proposed to undergo stabilization following ligand binding. They are also in agreement with fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies (23) which reported the existence of some IL-2Rβ/γc complexes before ligand binding and their modulation in the presence of IL-2. Interestingly, the crystallographic studies on heterocomplexes comprised of the IL-2R subunits (14, 15) showed that IL-2Rα lacks contact with IL-2Rβ or γc, in accord with our demonstration (Fig. 3) that overexpression of IL-2Rα fails to affect IL-2Rβ/γc heteromeric complex formation. The insensitivity of IL-R homomeric complex formation to IL-2 or IL-9 binding contrasts with the significant augmentation mediated by the ligands in the formation of heteromeric complexes with γc. This implies that ligand binding alters the balance between homomeric and heteromeric complexes containing γc in favor of the latter. This notion is in accord with the reported shift of the ectodomain of γc from homotrimers into IL-2-containing quaternary complexes with the other receptor in the presence of ligand (15). Moreover, formation of IL-2Rβ/γc or IL-9Rα/γc heterocomplexes, even in the presence of JAK3, is not sufficient for signaling, which still requires ligand binding. This suggests that the oligomeric interfaces within the heteromeric complex differ between the unliganded and ligand-activated complexes. Furthermore, the requirement for JAK3 for signaling indicates that the ligand-induced conformation in the quaternary complex may be important for the proper positioning of JAK1 and JAK3 for cross-phosphorylation.
Recently, several point mutations have been identified in Janus kinases, especially in pseudokinase domains, which render them constitutively active for signaling. Such mutations have been genetically linked to different malignancies, i.e. myeloproliferative syndromes for JAK2 mutants (V617F and exon 12 mutations) (52-56), adult T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (JAK1 mutations) (26), and acute megakaryocytic leukemia (JAK3 mutations) (27). JAK2 V617F, the model for such mutant JAKs, and homologous mutants of JAK1 and Tyk2 are constitutively active when overexpressed (57). However, at low physiologic levels of expression, dimerization of a cytokine receptor before ligand binding (preformed dimers) was shown to be necessary for activation of JAK2 V617F (50). Our results show that subunits of IL-2R and IL-9R exhibit ligand-independent homomeric complexes as well as both preformed and ligand-induced heteromeric complexes. We tested whether, in an analogous manner with the described effect of preformed erythropoietin receptor dimers on JAK2 V617F (50), signaling by the constitutively active JAK3 A572V mutant is promoted by homomeric γc complexes or by heteromeric complexes between IL-2Rβ or IL9Rα and γc. These data suggest that although preformed heteromeric complexes are strictly inactive in the presence of ligand in the case of wild-type JAK proteins, they promote signaling by JAK3 A572V. We suggest that preformed heteromeric complexes of IL9-Rα and γc in megakaryocytic progenitors may explain the paradox where JAK3, the unique Janus kinase specific for γc, triggers megakaryocytic leukemia (27).
In contrast, homo-oligomerization of JAK3 A572V by γc homomeric complexes does not induce signaling, emphasizing the need for JAK1 and the cytosolic tyrosine residues of the other receptor chains for STAT signaling. These results point to a novel difference between the activation and signaling mechanisms of JAK3 A572V and mutants of the other three JAKs. Previously, it has been noted that introduction of a phenylalanine at the homologous V617 position activated all JAKs except JAK3 (57).
In conclusion our study provides evidence that in the absence of ligand, homomeric and heteromeric complexes are formed between the subunits of the IL-2 and Il-9 receptor complexes. Homomeric complexes of γc are formed at the expense of heteromeric complexes with IL-2Rβ and IL-9Rα. All preformed complexes are strictly inactive in the absence of ligand. We also show that signaling by an oncogenic mutant of JAK3 (A572V) is promoted by preformed heteromeric complexes of IL-2Rβ or IL9Rα and γc. We suggest that preformed oligomers of cytokine receptors might have a more general role in supporting ligand-independent oncogenic signaling by constitutively active forms of Janus kinases.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Israeli Ministry of Health Chief Scientist's Office (to Y. I. H.). This work was also supported by the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium), the Salus Sanguinis Foundation, the Action de Recherche Concertée MEXP31C1 (University Catholique de Louvain), the Fondation Contre le Cancer (Brussels), PAI Program BCHM61B5 (Belgium), and the Atlantic Philantropies, New York (to S. N. C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Footnotes
The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; IL-2R, IL-2 receptor; HA, influenza hemagglutinin; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; γc, γ chain; JAK, Janus tyrosine kinase; TpoR, thrombopoietin receptor; TβRII, type II transforming growth factor-β receptor; LHRE, lactogenic hormone response element; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; GFP, green fluorescent protein; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; BSA, bovine serum albumin; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; MESF, molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome; JAK1, Janus kinase 1.
References
- 1.Demoulin, J. B., and Renauld, J. C. (1998) Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther. 4 243-256 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moriggl, R., Sexl, V., Piekorz, R., Topham, D., and Ihle, J. N. (1999) Immunity 11 225-230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schorle, H., Holtschke, T., Hunig, T., Schimpl, A., and Horak, I. (1991) Nature 352 621-624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Willerford, D. M., Chen, J., Ferry, J. A., Davidson, L., Ma, A., and Alt, F. W. (1995) Immunity 3 521-530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suzuki, H., Kundig, T. M., Furlonger, C., Wakeham, A., Timms, E., Matsuyama, T., Schmits, R., Simard, J. J., Ohashi, P. S., Griesser, H., Taniguchi, T., Paige, C. J., and Mak, T. W. (1995) Science 268 1472-1476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.DiSanto, J. P., Certain, S., Wilson, A., MacDonald, H. R., Avner, P., Fischer, A., and de Saint Basile, G. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24 3014-3018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moriggl, R., Topham, D. J., Teglund, S., Sexl, V., McKay, C., Wang, D., Hoffmeyer, A., van Deursen, J., Sangster, M. Y., Bunting, K. D., Grosveld, G. C., and Ihle, J. N. (1999) Immunity 10 249-259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Knoops, L., and Renauld, J. C. (2004) Growth Factors 22 207-215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steenwinckel, V., Louahed, J., Orabona, C., Huaux, F., Warnier, G., McKenzie, A., Lison, D., Levitt, R., and Renauld, J. C. (2007) J. Immunol. 178 3244-3251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Leonard, W. J., Depper, J. M., Uchiyama, T., Smith, K. A., Waldmann, T. A., and Greene, W. C. (1982) Nature 300 267-269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sharon, M., Klausner, R. D., Cullen, B. R., Chizzonite, R., and Leonard, W. J. (1986) Science 234 859-863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Teshigawara, K., Wang, H. M., Kato, K., and Smith, K. A. (1987) J. Exp. Med. 165 223-238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takeshita, T., Asao, H., Ohtani, K., Ishii, N., Kumaki, S., Tanaka, N., Munakata, H., Nakamura, M., and Sugamura, K. (1992) Science 257 379-382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang, X., Rickert, M., and Garcia, K. C. (2005) Science 310 1159-1163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stauber, D. J., Debler, E. W., Horton, P. A., Smith, K. A., and Wilson, I. A. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 2788-2793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang, H. M., and Smith, K. A. (1987) J. Exp. Med. 166 1055-1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nelson, B. H., Lord, J. D., and Greenberg, P. D. (1994) Nature 369 333-336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nakamura, Y., Russell, S. M., Mess, S. A., Friedmann, M., Erdos, M., Francois, C., Jacques, Y., Adelstein, S., and Leonard, W. J. (1994) Nature 369 330-333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kimura, Y., Takeshita, T., Kondo, M., Ishii, N., Nakamura, M., Van Snick, J., and Sugamura, K. (1995) Int. Immunol. 7 115-120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leonard, W. J., Shores, E. W., and Love, P. E. (1995) Immunol. Rev. 148 97-114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nelson, B. H., and Willerford, D. M. (1998) Adv. Immunol. 70 1-81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hofmann, S. R., Lam, A. Q., Frank, S., Zhou, Y. J., Ramos, H. L., Kanno, Y., Agnello, D., Youle, R. J., and O'Shea, J. J. (2004) Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 5039-5049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Damjanovich, S., Bene, L., Matko, J., Alileche, A., Goldman, C. K., Sharrow, S., and Waldmann, T. A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 13134-13139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Constantinescu, S. N., Keren, T., Russ, W. P., Ubarretxena-Belandia, I., Malka, Y., Kubatzky, K. F., Engelman, D. M., Lodish, H. F., and Henis, Y. I. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278 43755-43763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lachmanovich, E., Shvartsman, D. E., Malka, Y., Botvin, C., Henis, Y. I., and Weiss, A. M. (2003) J. Microsc. 212 122-131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Flex, E., Petrangeli, V., Stella, L., Chiaretti, L., Hornakova, T., Knoops, L., Ariola, C., Fodale, V., Clappier, E., Paoloni, F., Martinelli, S., Fragale, A., Sanchez, M., Tavolaro, S., Messina, M., Cazzaniga, G., Camera, A., Pizzolo, G., Tornesello, A., Vignetti, M., Battistini, A., Cavé, H., Gelb, B. D., Renauld, J.-C., Biondi, A., Constantinescu, S. N., Foà, R., and Tartaglia, M. (2008) J. Exp. Med. 205 751-758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Walters, D. K., Mercher, T., Gu, T. L., O'Hare, T., Tyner, J. W., Loriaux, M., Goss, V. L., Lee, K. A., Eide, C. A., Wong, M. J., Stoffregen, E. P., McGreevey, L., Nardone, J., Moore, S. A., Crispino, J., Boggon, T. J., Heinrich, M. C., Deininger, M. W., Polakiewicz, R. D., Gilliland, D. G., and Druker, B. J. (2006) Cancer Cell 10 65-75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pear, W. S., Nolan, G. P., Scott, M. L., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90 8392-8396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Keren, T., Roth, M. G., and Henis, Y. I. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276 26356-26363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Constantinescu, S. N., Keren, T., Socolovsky, M., Nam, H. S., Henis, Y. I., and Lodish, H. F. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 4379-4384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Seubert, N., Royer, Y., Staerk, J., Kubatzky, K. F., Moucadel, V., Krishnakumar, S., Smith, S. O., and Constantinescu, S. N. (2003) Mol. Cell 12 1239-1250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu, X., Constantinescu, S. N., Sun, Y., Bogan, J. S., Hirsch, D., Weinberg, R. A., and Lodish, H. F. (2000) Anal. Biochem. 280 20-28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Constantinescu, S. N., Liu, X., Beyer, W., Fallon, A., Shekar, S., Henis, Y. I., Smith, S. O., and Lodish, H. F. (1999) EMBO J. 18 3334-3347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Royer, Y., Staerk, J., Costuleanu, M., Courtoy, P. J., and Constantinescu, S. N. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280 27251-27261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sabath, D. F., Kaushansky, K., and Broudy, V. C. (1999) Blood 94 365-367 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Henis, Y. I., Moustakas, A., Lin, H. Y., and Lodish, H. F. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126 139-154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gilboa, L., Nohe, A., Geissendorfer, T., Sebald, W., Henis, Y. I., and Knaus, P. (2000) Mol. Biol. Cell 11 1023-1035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Renauld, J. C., Goethals, A., Houssiau, F., Van Roost, E., and Van Snick, J. (1990) Cytokine 2 9-12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gerland, K., Bataille-Simoneau, N., Basle, M., Fourcin, M., Gascan, H., and Mercier, L. (2000) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 168 1-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Peelman, F., Iserentant, H., De Smet, A. S., Vandekerckhove, J., Zabeau, L., and Tavernier, J. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281 15496-15504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gilboa, L., Wells, R. G., Lodish, H. F., and Henis, Y. I. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140 767-777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Palacios, R., and Steinmetz, M. (1985) Cell 41 727-734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Watowich, S. S., Wu, H., Socolovsky, M., Klingmuller, U., Constantinescu, S. N., and Lodish, H. F. (1996) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12 91-128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Darnell, J. E., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. (1994) Science 264 1415-1420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ihle, J. N. (2001) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13 211-217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brown, R. J., Adams, J. J., Pelekanos, R. A., Wan, Y., McKinstry, W. J., Palethorpe, K., Seeber, R. M., Monks, T. A., Eidne, K. A., Parker, M. W., and Waters, M. J. (2005) Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12 814-821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Remy, I., Wilson, I. A., and Michnick, S. W. (1999) Science 283 990-993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schlessinger, J. (2000) Cell 103 211-225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Livnah, O., Stura, E. A., Middleton, S. A., Johnson, D. L., Jolliffe, L. K., and Wilson, I. A. (1999) Science 283 987-990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lu, X., Huang, L. J., and Lodish, H. F. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283 5258-5266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kubatzky, K. F., Ruan, W., Gurezka, R., Cohen, J., Ketteler, R., Watowich, S. S., Neumann, D., Langosch, D., and Klingmuller, U. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11 110-115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.James, C., Ugo, V., Le Couedic, J. P., Staerk, J., Delhommeau, F., Lacout, C., Garcon, L., Raslova, H., Berger, R., Bennaceur-Griscelli, A., Villeval, J. L., Constantinescu, S. N., Casadevall, N., and Vainchenker, W. (2005) Nature 434 1144-1148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baxter, E. J., Scott, L. M., Campbell, P. J., East, C., Fourouclas, N., Swanton, S., Vassiliou, G. S., Bench, A. J., Boyd, E. M., Curtin, N., Scott, M. A., Erber, W. N., and Green, A. R. (2005) Lancet 365 1054-1061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Levine, R. L., Wadleigh, M., Cools, J., Ebert, B. L., Wernig, G., Huntly, B. J., Boggon, T. J., Wlodarska, I., Clark, J. J., Moore, S., Adelsperger, J., Koo, S., Lee, J. C., Gabriel, S., Mercher, T., D'Andrea, A., Frohling, S., Dohner, K., Marynen, P., Vandenberghe, P., Mesa, R. A., Tefferi, A., Griffin, J. D., Eck, M. J., Sellers, W. R., Meyerson, M., Golub, T. R., Lee, S. J., and Gilliland, D. G. (2005) Cancer Cell 7 387-397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kralovics, R., Passamonti, F., Buser, A. S., Teo, S. S., Tiedt, R., Passweg, J. R., Tichelli, A., Cazzola, M., and Skoda, R. C. (2005) N. Engl. J. Med. 352 1779-1790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Scott, L. M., Tong, W., Levine, R. L., Scott, M. A., Beer, P. A., Stratton, M. R., Futreal, P. A., Erber, W. N., McMullin, M. F., Harrison, C. N., Warren, A. J., Gilliland, D. G., Lodish, H. F., and Green, A. R. (2007) N. Engl. J. Med. 356 459-468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Staerk, J., Kallin, A., Demoulin, J. B., Vainchenker, W., and Constantinescu, S. N. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280 41893-41899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





