Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1993 Dec;31(12):3165–3169. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993

Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.

C M O'Hara 1, F C Tenover 1, J M Miller 1
PMCID: PMC266369  PMID: 8308108

Abstract

We compared the API 20E (21 h) (API; bioMérieux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo.), the Vitek GNI card (4 to 18 h) (Vitek; bioMérieux Vitek), the identification portion of the MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid Neg Combo 3 panel (2 h) (W/A; Baxter Diagnostics, Inc., West Sacramento, Calif.), and the Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF rotor (21 h) (Cobas; Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.), versus conventional biochemicals for their abilities to identify accurately 252 strains of biochemically typical and atypical members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli. All strains used were included in the data base of each product. At the end of the initial incubation, 194 (77.0%), 213 (84.5%), 198 (78.6%), and 192 (76.2%) strains were correct to the genus and species levels with the API, Vitek, W/A, and Cobas systems, respectively. After additional biochemical tests were performed, as directed by each manufacturer's protocol, the numbers of strains correctly identified to the genus and species levels were 241 (95.6%), 234 (92.8%), 243 (96.4%), and 230 (91.3%) with the four systems, respectively. The errors were random in all systems, with the exception of two atypical Salmonella enteritidis strains, each of which was misidentified by three systems. After the initial recommended incubation period, both API and Cobas were significantly less accurate than Vitek (Yates' corrected P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted between the results of Vitek and W/A or between the results of API and W/A. After additional tests were completed, Cobas was significantly less accurate than W/A (P < 0.05) but was equal in accuracy to Vitek and API. API, Vitek, and W/A were equal in accuracy after these same additional tests. All four systems were significantly more accurate after additional biochemical testing than after the initial reporting period (194 of 252 versus 241 of 252 for API, 213 of 252 versus 234 of 252 for Vitek, 198 of 252 versus 243 or 252 for W/A, and 192 of 252 versus 230 of 252 for Cobas [P<0.05]).

Full text

PDF
3165

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Farmer J. J., 3rd, Davis B. R., Hickman-Brenner F. W., McWhorter A., Huntley-Carter G. P., Asbury M. A., Riddle C., Wathen-Grady H. G., Elias C., Fanning G. R. Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):46–76. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.46-76.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geiss H. K., Geiss M. Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;11(7):610–616. doi: 10.1007/BF01961667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. O'Hara C. M., Miller J. M. Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A system for rapid (2-hour) identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1541–1543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1541-1543.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. O'Hara C. M., Rhoden D. L., Miller J. M. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):123–125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pfaller M. A., Bale M. J., Schulte K. R., Koontz F. P. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):1–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.1-5.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pfaller M. A., Sahm D., O'Hara C., Ciaglia C., Yu M., Yamane N., Scharnweber G., Rhoden D. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1422–1428. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1422-1428.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Plorde J. J., Gates J. A., Carlson L. G., Tenover F. C. Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):251–257. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.251-257.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shayegani M., Maupin P. S., McGlynn D. M. Evaluation of the API 20E system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):539–545. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.539-545.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith P. B., Tomfohrde K. M., Rhoden D. L., Balows A. API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):449–452. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.449-452.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stager C. E., Davis J. R. Automated systems for identification of microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Jul;5(3):302–327. doi: 10.1128/cmr.5.3.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tenover F. C., Mizuki T. S., Carlson L. G. Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A automated microbiology system for the identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1628–1634. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1628-1634.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Truant A. L., Starr E., Nevel C. A., Tsolakis M., Fiss E. F. Comparison of AMS-Vitek, MicroScan, and Autobac Series II for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May-Jun;12(3):211–215. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Visser M. R., Bogaards L., Rozenberg-Arska M., Verhoef J. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek Automicrobic systems for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):979–984. doi: 10.1007/BF01967786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Washington J. A., 2nd, Yu P. K., Martin W. J. Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Sep;22(3):267–269. doi: 10.1128/am.22.3.267-269.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES