Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1993 Dec;31(12):3289–3295. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3289-3295.1993

Conservation of a protective surface antigen of Tritrichomonas foetus.

J S Ikeda 1, R H BonDurant 1, C M Campero 1, L B Corbeil 1
PMCID: PMC266404  PMID: 7508459

Abstract

Bovine trichomoniasis is a sexually transmitted disease caused by the flagellated protozoan Tritrichomonas foetus. A protective surface antigen was previously identified and immunoaffinity purified from T. foetus isolate D1 with cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) TF1.15 and TF1.17 (BonDurant, R. H., R. R. Corbeil, and L. B. Corbeil, Infect. Immun. 61:1385-1394, 1993). This antigen elicited antibody responses in the serum and cervicovaginal mucus of heifers. Thus, it may be useful as an immunodiagnostic reagent as well as a subunit vaccine. Conservation of the antigen in all strains would be crucial for either application. We investigated the conservation of this antigen among 36 isolates of T. foetus from Argentina, Costa Rica, and the United States using MAbs TF1.15 and TF1.17 in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MAb TF1.17 reacted with 32 of the 36 isolates, whereas MAb TF1.15 reacted with all of the isolates tested. One of the isolates which did not react with MAb TF1.17 (i.e., D1#3) was investigated further by Western blotting (immunoblotting) to determine the reason for the lack of reactivity with one of the two cross-reactive MAbs. The antigenic band that was reactive with MAb TF1.15 had a molecular mass slightly lower than that of the corresponding band from isolate D1, which reacted with both MAbs TF1.15 and TF1.17. Thus, at least a major portion of the antigen appeared to be conserved. This was confirmed in a study of heifers infected with isolate D1#3. The vaginal immunoglobulin A antibodies of these infected heifers reacted with the antigen of isolate D1 that was immunoaffinity purified with MAb TF1.17. Therefore, even though the epitope recognized by MAb TF1.17 was missing in the challenge isolate (D1#3), the heifers developed an immune response to the rest of the molecule. These results indicate that the major portion of the previously described protective antigen is conserved in different isolates of T. foetus. This portion contains the epitope that reacts with MAb TF1.15. Most isolates express the whole antigen, which possesses both TFl.15 and TF1.17 epitopes, but the few isolates that are missing the portion containing the TF1.17 epitope may still elicit an immune reponse to the conserved portion. Thus, the protective surface antigen is promising for use in immunodiagnosis or vaccination against bovine trichomoniasis.

Full text

PDF
3289

Images in this article

3293Image
on p.3293
3293Image
on p.3293

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderete J. F., Garza G. E. Soluble Trichomonas vaginalis antigens in cell-free culture supernatants. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1984 Oct;13(2):147–158. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(84)90109-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arroyo R., Alderete J. F. Trichomonas vaginalis surface proteinase activity is necessary for parasite adherence to epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1989 Oct;57(10):2991–2997. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.10.2991-2997.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BonDurant R. H., Anderson M. L., Blanchard P., Hird D., Danaye-Elmi C., Palmer C., Sischo W. M., Suther D., Utterback W., Weigler B. J. Prevalence of trichomoniasis among California beef herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 May 15;196(10):1590–1593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BonDurant R. H., Corbeil R. R., Corbeil L. B. Immunization of virgin cows with surface antigen TF1.17 of Tritrichomonas foetus. Infect Immun. 1993 Apr;61(4):1385–1394. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.4.1385-1394.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark B. L., Dufty J. H., Parsonson I. M. Immunisation of bulls against trichomoniasis. Aust Vet J. 1983 Jun;60(6):178–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1983.tb05957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark B. L., Emery D. L., Dufty J. H. Therapeutic immunisation of bulls with the membranes and glycoproteins of Tritrichomonas foetus var. brisbane. Aust Vet J. 1984 Feb;61(2):65–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1984.tb07197.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark B. L., Parsonson I. M., White M. B., Banfield J. C., Young J. S. Control of trichomoniasis in a large herd of beef cattle. Aust Vet J. 1974 Oct;50(10):424–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1974.tb06862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dennett D. P., Reece R. L., Barasa J. O., Johnson R. H. Observations on the incidence and distribution of serotypes of Tritrichomonas foetus in beef cattle in north-eastern Australia. Aust Vet J. 1974 Oct;50(10):427–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1974.tb06863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fíori P. L., Rappelli P., Manca C., Mattana A., Cappuccinelli P. Phenotypic variation of surface antigenic determinants in Trichomonas vaginalis detected by monoclonal antibodies. Microbiologica. 1992 Jul;15(3):227–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Herr S., Ribeiro L. M., Claassen E., Myburgh J. G. A reduction in the duration of infection with Tritrichomonas foetus following vaccination in heifers and the failure to demonstrate a curative effect in infected bulls. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1991 Mar;58(1):41–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodgson J. L., Jones D. W., Widders P. R., Corbeil L. B. Characterization of Tritrichomonas foetus antigens by use of monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun. 1990 Sep;58(9):3078–3083. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.9.3078-3083.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kvasnicka W. G., Hanks D., Huang J. C., Hall M. R., Sandblom D., Chu H. J., Chavez L., Acree W. M. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of inoculating cattle with a vaccine containing Tritrichomonas foetus. Am J Vet Res. 1992 Nov;53(11):2023–2027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kvasnicka W. G., Taylor R. E., Huang J. C., Hanks D., Tronstad R. J., Bosomworth A., Hall M. R. Investigations of the incidence of bovine trichomoniasis in nevada and of the efficacy of immunizing cattle with vaccines containing Tritrichomonas foetus. Theriogenology. 1989 May;31(5):963–971. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(89)90479-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parsonson I. M., Clark B. L., Dufty J. H. Early pathogenesis and pathology of Tritrichomonas foetus infection in virgin heifers. J Comp Pathol. 1976 Jan;86(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(76)90028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skirrow S. Z., BonDurant R. H. Immunoglobulin isotype of specific antibodies in reproductive tract secretions and sera in Tritrichomonas foetus-infected heifers. Am J Vet Res. 1990 Apr;51(4):645–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Skirrow S. Z., BonDurant R. H. Induced Tritrichomonas foetus infection in beef heifers. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Mar 15;196(6):885–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Talbot J. A., Nielsen K., Corbeil L. B. Cleavage of proteins of reproductive secretions by extracellular proteinases of Tritrichomonas foetus. Can J Microbiol. 1991 May;37(5):384–390. doi: 10.1139/m91-062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES