Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1988 Apr;26(4):692–695. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.4.692-695.1988

Comparison of Meritec-Strep with Streptex for direct colony grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci from primary isolation and subculture plates.

J R Hamilton 1
PMCID: PMC266413  PMID: 3366863

Abstract

Meritec-Strep (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) a coagglutination method, was compared with Streptex (Wellcome Diagnostics, Research Triangle Park, N.C.), a latex agglutination method, for the identification of beta-hemolytic streptococcal groups A, B, C, F, and G by the direct colony method. A total of 124 beta-hemolytic streptococcal isolates were tested, which included 77 from group A, 15 from group B, 10 from group C, 1 from group F, and 21 from group G. All were tested from subculture, and 74 (60%) were also tested from primary isolation plates. For Meritec-Strep, usually one colony was directly applied to the reaction card for testing each grouping reagent, while for Streptex, five colonies were tested after a 1-h extraction process. Complete agreement was obtained for all isolates tested from subculture with the kits. From primary isolation plates, Meritec-Strep correctly identified 97.3% of the isolates compared with 94.6% correctly identified for Streptex. Meritec-Strep produced a false-negative for one group A isolate and positive reactions for group A and F reagents with another group A isolate. A diphtheroid contaminant caused the positive group F reaction. Streptex produced false-negative results for one group A and three group C isolates. Most positive reactions were strong and rapid (less than 30 s) for both kits. The negative test control provided in the individual group A and B kits was nonreactive for all isolates. Meritec-Strep accurately identified isolated colonies of beta-hemolytic streptococci on primary isolation and subculture plates. It provided faster results than Streptex by eliminating the time and manipulation of antigen extraction and needed fewer colonies when individual group A or B reagents were used.

Full text

PDF
692

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bixler-Forell E., Martin W. J., Moody M. D. Clinical evaluation of the improved streptex method for grouping streptococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;2(2):113–118. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90006-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdash N. M., West M. E., Newell R. T., Teti G. Group identification of streptococci. Evaluation of three rapid agglutination methods. Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Dec;76(6):819–822. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/76.6.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castle D., Kessock-Philip S., Easmon C. S. Evaluation of an improved Streptex kit for the grouping of beta-haemolytic streptococci by agglutination. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jul;35(7):719–722. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.7.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Facklam R. R., Cooksey R. C., Wortham E. C. Evaluation of commercial latex agglutination reagents for grouping streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):641–646. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.641-646.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Keville M. W., Doern G. V. Comparison of the API 20S Streptococcus identification system with an immunorheophoresis procedure and two commercial latex agglutination tests for identifying beta-hemolytic streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):92–95. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.92-95.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Slifkin M., Engwall C., Pouchet G. R. Direct-plate serological grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci from primary isolation plates with the Phadebact streptococcus test. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Apr;7(4):356–360. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.4.356-360.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Slifkin M., Interval G. Serogrouping single colonies of beta-hemolytic streptococci from primary throat culture plates with nitrous acid extraction and Phadebact streptococcal reagents. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):541–545. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.541-545.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Slifkin M., Pouchet-Melvin G. R. Evaluation of three commercially available test products for serogrouping beta-hemolytic streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Mar;11(3):249–255. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.3.249-255.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yajko D. M., Lawrence J., Nassos P., Young J., Hadley W. K. Clinical trial comparing bacitracin with Strep-A-Chek for accuracy and turnaround time in the presumptive identification of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):431–434. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.431-434.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES