Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1993 Dec;31(12):3336–3339. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3336-3339.1993

Reliability of the E test for detection of ampicillin, vancomycin, and high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus spp.

J E Schulz 1, D F Sahm 1
PMCID: PMC266427  PMID: 8308134

Abstract

By comparison with agar dilution results, the E test was investigated for the ability to detect high-level aminoglycoside (gentamicin and streptomycin), ampicillin, and vancomycin resistance among strains representing six enterococcal species. For ampicillin and vancomycin, disk diffusion results also were obtained. No false high-level aminoglycoside resistance occurred, and no false gentamicin susceptibility was noted. With the high-range streptomycin E test (2,048 micrograms), 24% of the 38 resistant strains were falsely susceptible. However, these discordances could likely be reconciled by adjustments in incubation duration and by using broth microdilution rather than agar screen breakpoint criteria, or by using the lower-range (1,024-micrograms) strip. For ampicillin, category results obtained by E test and disk diffusion showed good agreement with agar dilution; E test MICs were generally comparable to agar dilution MICs. The E test was more sensitive than disk diffusion for detecting vancomycin-intermediate strains, but for these strains and those exhibiting low-level vancomycin resistance (MIC, 32 to 128 micrograms/ml), disk diffusion and E test inhibition zones must be interpreted with caution. Given the reliability of E test for detecting resistance to anti-enterococcal agents, the decision to use this method should be based on convenience, cost, testing frequency, and satisfaction with currently used methods.

Full text

PDF
3336

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker C. N., Stocker S. A., Culver D. H., Thornsberry C. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):533–538. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.533-538.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bush L. M., Calmon J., Cherney C. L., Wendeler M., Pitsakis P., Poupard J., Levison M. E., Johnson C. C. High-level penicillin resistance among isolates of enterococci. Implications for treatment of enterococcal infections. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Apr 1;110(7):515–520. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-7-515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Courvalin P. Resistance of enterococci to glycopeptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Dec;34(12):2291–2296. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.12.2291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Facklam R. R., Collins M. D. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):731–734. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.731-734.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grayson M. L., Eliopoulos G. M., Wennersten C. B., Ruoff K. L., De Girolami P. C., Ferraro M. J., Moellering R. C., Jr Increasing resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics among clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium: a 22-year review at one institution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Nov;35(11):2180–2184. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.11.2180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang M. B., Baker C. N., Banerjee S., Tenover F. C. Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3243–3248. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3243-3248.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Louie M., Simor A. E., Szeto S., Patel M., Kreiswirth B., Low D. E. Susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):41–45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.41-45.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Murray B. E. Beta-lactamase-producing enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Nov;36(11):2355–2359. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.11.2355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray B. E. The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jan;3(1):46–65. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ngui-Yen J. H., Bryce E. A., Porter C., Smith J. A. Evaluation of the E test by using selected gram-positive bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2150–2152. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2150-2152.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sahm D. F., Boonlayangoor S., Iwen P. C., Baade J. L., Woods G. L. Factors influencing determination of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Sep;29(9):1934–1939. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.9.1934-1939.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sahm D. F., Boonlayangoor S., Schulz J. E. Detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci other than Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2595–2598. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2595-2598.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sahm D. F., Kissinger J., Gilmore M. S., Murray P. R., Mulder R., Solliday J., Clarke B. In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1588–1591. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sahm D. F., Olsen L. In vitro detection of enterococcal vancomycin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1846–1848. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sanchez M. L., Barrett M. S., Jones R. N. The E-Test applied to susceptibility tests of gonococci, multiply-resistant enterococci, and Enterobacteriaceae producing potent beta-lactamases. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;15(5):459–463. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90090-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sanchez M. L., Barrett M. S., Jones R. N. Use of the E test to predict high-level resistance to aminoglycosides among enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):3030–3032. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.3030-3032.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Swenson J. M., Ferraro M. J., Sahm D. F., Charache P., Tenover F. C. New vancomycin disk diffusion breakpoints for enterococci. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Working Group on Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2525–2528. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2525-2528.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Willey B. M., Kreiswirth B. N., Simor A. E., Willaims G., Scriver S. R., Phillips A., Low D. E. Detection of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1621–1624. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1621-1624.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES