Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1988 May;26(5):962–964. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.962-964.1988

Comparative evaluation of Oxoid Signal and BACTEC radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

M P Weinstein 1, S Mirrett 1, L B Reller 1
PMCID: PMC266496  PMID: 3384917

Abstract

The Oxoid Signal (Oxoid U.S.A., Inc., Columbia, Md.) blood culture system is a newly described, innovative method for visually detecting growth of microorganisms (D. Sawney, S. Hinder, D. Swaine, and E.Y. Bridson, J. Clin. Pathol. 39:1259-1263, 1986). We did 5,999 paired comparisons of equal volumes (10 ml) of blood in the Oxoid Signal and BACTEC (Johnson Laboratories, Towson, Md.) radiometric blood culture systems at two university hospitals that use identical methods of obtaining and processing specimens. Overall, more microorganisms were detected in the BACTEC system (P less than 0.001), in particular, streptococci (P less than 0.01), fungi (P less than 0.001), and nonfermentative gram-negative rods, especially Acinetobacter species (P less than 0.001). Trends favoring the BACTEC system for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus species, and Neisseria species were noted. There were no differences in the yield of staphylococci, members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, and anaerobic bacteria. When both systems detected sepsis, the BACTEC did so earlier (P less than 0.001). This advantage was most notable at 24 h (70% of BACTEC positives detected versus 48% of Oxoid positives). The proportion of positives detected after 48 h, however, was similar (BACTEC, 84%; Oxoid, 78%). Revisions in the Oxoid Signal system itself or in the processing of Oxoid bottles appear to be necessary to improve its performance in detecting certain microorganism groups, especially fungi.

Full text

PDF
962

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. King A., Bone G., Phillips I. Comparison of radiometric and gas capture system for blood cultures. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Jun;39(6):661–665. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.6.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Reimer L. G., McDaniel J. D., Mirrett S., Reller L. B., Wang W. L. Controlled evaluation of supplemented peptone and Bactec blood culture broths for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):531–534. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.531-534.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sawhney D., Hinder S., Swaine D., Bridson E. Y. Novel method for detecting micro-organisms in blood cultures. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Nov;39(11):1259–1263. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.11.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Stratton C. W., Reimer L. G., Wang W. L. Controlled evaluation of the agar-slide and radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221–225. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.221-225.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Murphy J. R., Lichtenstein K. A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35–53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES