Abstract
We initiated a comparative study of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation: a spectrophotometric method, the Wickerham card method, a hemacytometer method, and the Prompt inoculation system. The variability in inoculum size obtained when each method was applied to two strains each of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Torulopsis glabrata, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae was analyzed in a single laboratory. Each method was performed in triplicate on the same day and on three separate days to provide estimates of within-day and between-day variations. Inoculum size was determined by viable colony counts. The greatest range of inoculum sizes was seen with the Wickerham card method. Viable counts ranged from 1.1 X 10(6) to 24.2 X 10(6) CFU/ml among the 12 yeast isolates. The greatest variation was observed with the Prompt system. Within-day coefficients of variation averaged 19% (range, 4 to 45%), and between-day coefficients of variation averaged 22% (range, 3 to 51%). Variation between laboratories was evaluated by comparing inoculum values obtained by each method in three different laboratories for two strains of C. albicans. The spectrophotometric method was the least variable and the Wickerham card and hemacytometer methods were the most variable methods between laboratories. The spectrophotometric method is recommended as the method of choice for preparation of a standardized inoculum suspension for susceptibility testing of yeasts.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Block E. R., Jennings A. E., Bennett J. E. Variables influencing susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-fluorocytosine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Oct;4(4):392–395. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.4.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calhoun D. L., Roberts G. D., Galgiani J. N., Bennett J. E., Feingold D. S., Jorgensen J., Kobayashi G. S., Shadomy S. Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):298–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.298-301.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dick J. D., Merz W. G., Saral R. Incidence of polyene-resistant yeasts recovered from clinical specimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jul;18(1):158–163. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.1.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiani J. N. Antifungal susceptibility tests. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Dec;31(12):1867–1870. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.12.1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiani J. N., Reiser J., Brass C., Espinel-Ingroff A., Gordon M. A., Kerkering T. M. Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1343–1347. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiant J. N., Stevens D. A. Turbidimetric studies of growth inhibition of yeasts with three drugs: inquiry into inoculum-dependent susceptibility testing, time of onset of drug effect, and implications for current and newer methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):249–254. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lund M. E., Hawkinson R. W. Evaluation of the Prompt inoculation system for preparation of standardized bacterial inocula. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):84–91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.84-91.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Gerarden T. The use of the Prompt Inoculation System in preparing a standardized yeast inoculum. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Dec;88(6):743–745. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/88.6.743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryley J. F., Wilson R. G., Barrett-Bee K. J. Azole resistance in Candida albicans. Sabouraudia. 1984;22(1):53–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiller R. L., Bennett J. E., Scholer H. J., Wall M., Polak A., Stevens D. A. Correlation of in vitro susceptibility test results with in vivo response: flucytosine therapy in a systemic candidiasis model. J Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;147(6):1070–1077. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.6.1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicks J. H., Nelson R. L., Krejcarek G. E. Rapid inoculum standardization system: a novel device for standardization of inocula in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):1114–1119. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.1114-1119.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]