Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to modulate intracellular effectors involved in cardiac function. We recently reported homocysteine (Hcy)-induced ERK-phosphorylation was suppressed by pertussis toxin (PTX), which suggested the involvement of GPCRs in initiating signal transduction. An activated GPCR undergoes down regulation via a known mechanism involving ERK, GRK2, β-arrestin1: ERK activity increases; GRK2 activity increases; β-arrestin1 is degraded. We hypothesized that Hcy treatment leads to GPCR activation and down regulation. Microvascular endothelial cells were treated with Hcy. Expression of phospho-ERK1 and phospho-GRK2 was determined using Western blot, standardized to ERK1, GRK2, and β-actin. Hcy was shown to dephosphorylate GRK2, thereby enhancing the activity. The results provided further evidence that Hcy acts as an agonist to activate GPCRs, followed by their down regulation. Hcy was also shown to decrease the content of the following G proteins and other proteins: β-arrestin1, Gαq/11, Gα12/13, Gi/o.
Keywords: G protein, GPCR, GRK2, ERK1, β-Arrestin1, c-Src, Desensitization, Heart failure, Hcy, Homocysteine
Introduction
Homocysteine (Hcy) is a homologue of cysteine and only differs in its side chain that contains an additional methylene group before the thiol group [1]. High plasma levels of Hcy are an independent risk factor in coronary artery disease [1, 2]. Moreover, elevated Hcy levels in CHF patients were also correlated with severity of disease and mortality [1, 3]. Another study showed that the presence of elevated Hcy (>12 μM) predicts progression of coronary plaque burden [4]. Moreover, HHcy exacerbated cardiac remodeling in response to hypertension, making Hcy a powerful stimulus for ventricular hypertrophy [5]. The Women’s Antioxidant and Folic Acid Cardiovascular Study (WAFACS) clinical study was conducted to examine the effects of administering relevant vitamin (B6, B12) co-factors that aid in converting Hcy into benign metabolic intermediates; although this study was unable to lower Hcy levels, it did not undermine the independent risk factor that Hcy imposes. Rather, it warrants further investigation for a solution to lowering elevated plasma Hcy levels.
ERK-phosphorylation was suppressed by pertussis toxin (PTX), which suggested that GPCRs were activated by Hcy that leads to ERK1 activation [6]. G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is a large class of receptors that can detect extracellular molecules and activate signal transduction pathways that lead to cellular responses [7]. In context of the cardiovasculature, GPCRs can also mediate function via regulation of calcium; this is true for the Gαq pathways that stimulates PLC-B to produce intracellular mediators of calcium, inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) [7]. This classical model of activation of GPCRs involves release of heterotrimeric G proteins that act as secondary messengers to activate other intracellular effectors. ERK1 was activated via this classical model of activation that could come from the Gαq class of G proteins [8].
There is a dampening of this signaling cascade via desensitization of GPCR receptors, leading to an uncoupling of the agonist-induced signal [9, 10]. One group of kinases, GPCR kinases (GRKs) only phosphorylate GPCRs that are agonist-bound [9, 11, 12]. After this process, referred to as desensitization, receptors can be removed from the cells’ surface. This process is referred to as endocytosis, sequestration, internalization, or down regulation of GPCR receptors; this is, in part, mediated by β-arrestins [9, 13].
β-arrestins are proteins found in the cytosol that migrate to the membrane and bind activated, phosphorylated GPCRs [9, 14, 15]. Binding of β-arrestins to the GPCRs provides a scaffold for the activation of MAPKS (mitogen-activated protein kinases), such as ERK 1/2 [9], and c-Src, an intracellular tyrosine kinase [9, 15, 16]. The β-arrestin1/c-SRC interaction is important for receptor internalization since c-Src is found to phosphorylate primary endocytic intermediates, such as dynamin [17]. β-arrestins can target receptors to clathrin-coated pits (CCPs) through binding with clathrin and clathrin adapter 2 (AP-2) complex [18]. GPCRs couple to specific classes of heterotrimeric G proteins [9]. When an agonist binds to a GPCR, the receptor shows an active conformation, and G proteins dissociate to further transduce the signal to other intracellular effectors [9].
Our experiment did not aim to discover the specific signaling pathway of Hcy on GPCR effectors (which would require many blockers), but rather to examine the effects of Hcy on many signaling effectors of an already established classical pathway of GPCR downregulation/desensitization. If there are any variations to how we already understand this pathway to operate, this manuscript could serve as a basis for that further investigation. Moreover, we were primarily interested in net G protein content available for signaling as well as expression/activity of the aforementioned ffectors.
Since administration of PTX leads to the inhibition of Hcy-induced ERK-phosphorylation, we hypothesized that Hcy acted as an agonist to GPCRs and will set in motion the classical pathway of GPCR desensitization. We aimed to perform a time-course evaluation for detecting activation of ERK1/2 (a common intermediate in GPCR activation), activation of GRK2, activation of β-arrestin1 and activation of c-Src with a standard dose of Hcy using Western blot analysis of treated rat micro-vascular endothelial cells (MVECs). Moreover, we determined net G protein content modulation for the following G proteins involved in calcium regulation: Gαq/11, Gα12/13, Gi/o.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
The antibody against GRK2, c-Src, ERK, p-ERK1, Gαq/11, Gα12/13, Gi/o, and β-arrestin1 was obtained from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA); p-GRK2, p-c-Src, p-β-arrestin1, and β-actin was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Plain DMEM/F-12 50/50 medium was obtained from Mediatech, Inc (Herndon, VA). Fetal bovine serum was acquired from Gemini Bio-Products, (West Sacramenta, CA). Claycomb medium was penicillin, streptomycin, trypsin-EDTA, and Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) were purchased from GIBCO-BRL (Grand Island, NY); DL-Hcy, NaCl, sodium orthovanadate, Tris, EDTA, EGTA, dithiothreitol, NP-40, protease inhibitor cocktail, fibronectin, agarose, from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); D,L-homocysteine was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Cell culture and treatments
Rat MVECs were procured from Cambrex (Walkersville, MD) and cultured in endothelial basal medium 2 supplemented with growth factors as described in the supplier’s protocol and 12% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated FCS maintained at 37°C in a 95% O2-5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. MVECs were used at passages 8–13, grown to near confluence, and serum starved overnight when treated with the indicated reagents for Western blot analysis.
Preparation of samples, Western blot analysis, and immunodetection
After treatment, medium was aspirated from six-well culture dishes and MVECs were washed twice with ice-cold 1x PBS. Ice-cold lysis buffer (in mM: 50 Tris Hcl, pH 7.4, 150 NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 EGTA) and freshly prepared inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 200 μM sodium orthovandate, and 1 μg/ml aprotinin) were added to each well. Plates were scraped on ice, and the supernatant containing cytosolic protein was collected and centrifuged at 5,500 g for 10 min at 4°C, and resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels and blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After being transferred, blots were washed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 5 min at room temperature and incubated in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were then incubated with the indicated primary antibodies [appropriate dilutions in 3% Milk solution of TBST, (0.1% Tween 20 + TBS: TBST)] overnight at 4°C using gentle agitation. The blots were washed four times (5-min wash each time) with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:3,000 dilution in 3% Milk-TBST). After being washed with TBST 4 times (10 min wash each time), the proteins of interest were detected using an ECL plus kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The membranes were then stripped using 0.2 M NaOH solution for 30 min at room temperature and reprobed with a standard: β-actin. ERK was normalized to β-actin, and p-ERK was normalized to ERK. Similarly, GRK2 was normalized to β-actin; p-GRK2 was normalized to GRK2. All other proteins were normalized to β-actin.
Data analysis and statistics
Values are means ± SE from at least three different experiments. The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test for comparison of the results between various treatment groups. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. GRK2 activity was determined as the reciprocal of phospho-GRK2 expression.
Results
Figure 1a shows that at a standard time point of 60 min, ERK1 showed the greatest increase at 10 μM and 100 μM treatments; significance was reached at only 10 μM. However, there was a trend of increasing ERK activation at 100 μM. We selected the higher concentration of 100 μM to perform our time-course evaluation of ERK activation for the following time points: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 min (Fig. 1b). There was a 1.3-fold increasing trend at 15 min. Significance was reached at 30 min with a 1.4-fold increase and returned to control levels at 45 min. At 60 min, there again was a 1.3-fold increasing trend. At 2 h, ERK1 activation returned to control levels.
Fig. 1.
(a) A significant increase of ERK1 activity at 5 and 100 μM Hcy with a standard 60 min time condition (P < 0.05, n = 3). (b) A time-course evaluation of ERK1 activity using 100 μM Hcy and an increasing trend at 15 min and 60 min with statistical significance reached at 30 min (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Figure 2a shows that GRK2 was dephosphorylated and, thereby, activated at the following concentrations with a standard 60 min treatment: A 100 μM Hcy treatment resulted in a 1.4-fold increasing trend of activity; 500 μM Hcy treatment showed a 1.7-fold statistical increase in activity. The time-course evaluation of activity showed an increasing trend at 60 min to 1.2-fold. Statistical significance was reached with an increase in activity at 120 min to 1.2-fold that of control levels (Fig. 2b). Figures 3a, b and 4a, b show similar results for two different proteins and phosphor-isoforms: c-Src and β -arrestin1. There was a statistically significant decrease of c-Src, p-c-Src, p-β-arrestin1, and β-arrestin1 with the following results: 60 min treatment c-Src (500 μM, 0.7 that of control values); 60 min treatment p-c-Src (500 μM, 0.5 that of control values); 60 min treatment p-β-Arrestin1 (500 μM, 0.7 that of control values); 60 min treatment β-arrestin1 (500 μM, 0.6 that of control values); Time-course evaluation p-c-Src (100 μM, 120 min, 0.7 that of controls); time-course evaluation c-Src (100 μM, 120 min, 0.8 that of controls); time-course evaluation β-arrestin1 (100 μM, 120 min, 0.7 that of controls); time-course evaluation p-β-arrestin1 (100 μM, 120 min, 0.8 that of controls).
Fig. 2.
(a) A dose-dependent increase in GRK2 activity: trend at 100 μM Hcy, 60 min, significance 500 μM Hcy, 60 min (P < 0.05, n = 3). (b) A time-course evaluation was performed with significance at 100 μM Hcy, 120 min (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Fig. 3.
(a) A dose-dependent decrease of p-β -Arrestin1 and β-arrestin1 content: significance at 500 μM Hcy, 60 min (P < 0.05, n = 3). (b) A time-course evaluation was performed showing a significant decrease at 100 μM Hcy 120 min (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Fig. 4.
(a) A dose-dependent decrease of p-c-Src and c-Src content: significance at 500 μM Hcy, 60 min (P < 0.05, n = 3). (b) A significant decrease in content of p-c-Src and c-Src with a time-course evaluation of 100 μM Hcy 120 min (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Figure 5 shows that Gαq/11 was decreased dose-dependently at 24 h with a trend beginning at 50 μM, and significance reached with the following concentrations: 75,100,500 μM 0.05. At 48 h, there was a significant decrease of Gαq/11 at 500 μM. Figure 6 shows no increase or decrease of Gα12/13 at 24 h at the following Hcy concentrations: 0,25,50,75,100,500 μM. Figure 6 shows a significant decrease of Gα12/13 at 48 h and 500 μM. At 48 h, there is a significant decrease of Gi/o using 500 μM Hcy treatment (Fig. 7).
Fig. 5.
Hcy treatment showed a dose-dependent decrease of Gαq/11 at 24 h for the following concentrations: 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 500 μM; significant decreases were found at 75, 100, and 500 μM (P < 0.05, n = 3). At 48 h, Gαq/11 content returned to baseline levels for all doses of Hcy except 500 μM where there was a significant decrease (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Fig. 6.
Western blot showed no significant increase or decrease of Gα12/13 for the following concentrations: 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 500 μM at 24 h (P < 0.05, n = 3). There was a significant decrease of Gα12/13 using 500 μM Hcy treatment for 48 h (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Fig. 7.
Western blot showed no significant increase or decrease of Gi/o for the following concentrations: 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 500 μM at 24 h (P < 0.05, n = 3). There was a significant decrease of Gi/o using 500 μM Hcy treatment for 48 h (P < 0.05, n = 3)
Discussion
A vessel consists of both an endothelial layer and smooth muscle layer [19]. The endothelial layer contains many GPCRs that affect signaling of the inner smooth muscle layer [20]. One study has already shown that Hcy increased intracellular calcium within MVEC [6]. Another study has shown that the increased [Ca2+]i of endothelial cells triggered a release of an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) from the endothelial cells, thereby relaxing the underlying muscle layer [21]. Other studies have linked an increase in endothelial calcium to an increase in Nitric oxide (NO) that may permeate the membrane and relax smooth muscle of vasculature [19]. Since we have shown much of the Gαq/11 (increases intracellular calcium) available for signaling has decreased in presence of Hcy, this would logically inhibit the ability of the vasculature to relax further with continued presence of Hcy. The continued down regulation of G proteins responsible for increase of calcium in endothelial layer may aggravate hypertension that is known to occur in HHcy Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

Our results suggested Hcy acts as an agonist to potentiate GPCRs and activate the classical GPCR desensitization pathway. We have shown an increase of ERK1 activity that is characteristic of GPCR activation followed by an increase in GRK2 activity and final degradation of β-arrestin1, which is known to occur in down regulation of Class B GPCRs. Moreover, Gαq/11, Gα12/13, and Gi/o G proteins that are involved in calcium regulation and attached to GPCRs are down regulated
A GPCR agonist can transduce an increase in ERK1 activity [22]. ERK-phosphorylation was suppressed by PTX (PTX inhibits both Gi/o and Gαq G proteins of GPCRs), which suggested that GPCRs were activated by Hcy that lead to ERK1 activation [6]. This suggested that initial binding of agonist to GPCRs activated ERK1 through a classical pathway (e.g. IP3, DAG); further ERK1 activation occured via scaffolding by GPCR receptor internalization protein species, β-arrestins and c-Src [23]. Consistent with GPCR activation, we witnessed an increasing trend of ERK1 activation at 15-min 100 μM Hcy; at 30 min there was a significant increase with this concentration. Our decision to use the greater Hcy concentration (100 μM) for ERK when only a trend was seen at the 60 min time point stems from past studies that have used higher concentrations for testing expressions of other proteins, like matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases [24, 25]. ERK is a very unique protein that is constantly phosphorylating and dephosphorylating; ERK may be phosphorylated at one time and concentration while dephosphorylated at a further time and same concentration (this can also be seen in the time-course using 100microMolar Hcy). ERK1 activity dropped to control levels at 45 min; however, there was an increasing trend at 60 min with 100 μM Hcy treatment.
GRK2 is a major player for the regulation of cardiac chronotropic and ionotropic response to catecholamines; in fact, its genetic ablation caused embryonic lethality in the developing embryo [11, 26–28]. The decrease in signaling activity of lymphocyte β2-adrenergic receptors was associated with an increase in expression of GRK2 [11, 28]. The inhibition of GRK2 also allows for enhanced response to circulating catecholamines since this reduces receptor desensitization [11, 28]. In vitro studies showed that GRK2 is capable of phosphorylating and desensitizing almost all GPCRs [11]. Overexpression of GRK2 can attenuate Gαq signaling; one example of this is for metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a [9]. In fact, our results show that an increase of activity of GRK2 was associated with a decrease in Gαq content.
Consistent with how GRK2 mediates signaling response, we found that the sympathoexcitatory molecule, Hcy, resulted in an increase in GRK2 activity, thereby decreasing the chronic activation of certain GPCRs. One site of phosphorylation for GRK2 is at a carboxyl-terminal serine residue (Ser670) [22]. The phosphorylation at Ser670 impaired ability of GRK2 to phosphorylate soluble and membrane-incorporated receptor substrates, thereby inhibiting activity; hence, dephosphorylation of GRK2 at this site indicated an increase in activity of this protein in phosphorylating agonist-bound GPCRs.
One caveat that should be mentioned is that although GRK activity is generally indicative of an agonist-bound GPCR activity, GRK2 can be phosphorylated by PKC and PKA [29]; although these kinases are major players in G protein pathways, PKC can also be activated by NMDA receptor activation [30]. Hcy has been shown to activate NMDA receptors [30]. Of course, this caveat may not be relevant considering there are several isoforms of these kinases that could be specific to a certain protein and pathway.
A classical role of desensitization is the binding of β-arrestin to GRK-phosphorylated receptors; this uncoupled the receptor from its G proteins and prevented further signal transduction [9, 11, 12, 31]. Dephosphorylation of Ser412 of β-arrestin1 is required for an association between β-arrestin1 and c-Src, as well as β-arrestin1/clathrin association that results in GPCR internalization [32, 33]. A decrease of ERK activity attenuated β-arrestin1 phosphorylation and, therefore, increased the concentration of dephosphorylated β-arrestin1 that can proceed in mediating endocytosis of a receptor [34]. We were unable to capture the increase in activity of β-arrestin1 at Ser412 since baseline levels of β-arrestin1 also decreased at our chosen concentration and time point (100 μM Hcy 120 min). This is easy to explain in context of how a receptor is down regulated. In the case of class B GPCRs, β-arrestin1 is degraded along with the receptor [35].
One study showed that c-Src regulated clathrin adapter protein 2 interaction with β-arrestin during clathrin-mediated internalization; c-Src-depleted cells show a delay in receptor internalization [18]. The anti-Tyr529 c-SRC was used to investigate the phosphorylation status of the regulatory tyrosine in the carboxyl terminus of c-Src [36]. In the inactive Src molecule, the Tyr529 is normally phosphorylated and engaged with the Src homology 2 domain of the amino terminus of Src; hence, dephosphorylation of this residue is typically required for activation of c-Src [36]. We had similar difficulty in testing for activity of c-Src as we did with β-arrestin1. Since c-Src is known to complex with β-arrestin1, this could suggested that c-Src is degraded along with the β-arrestin1/c-Src complex. However, as it stands, we are only witnessing the degradation of these proteins: c-Src, β-arrestin1.
A decrease in receptor number will also correspond with a decrease in the attached G proteins that a receptor utilizes. This was true when performing live cell imaging that shows Gαs and β2-adrenergic receptor internalizing via clathrin and dynamin mechanism [37]. Another study showed that β-adrenergic receptor stimulation promoted Gαs internalization though lipid rafts for further signaling and eventual degradation in absence of its receptor [38]. In fact, chronic activation of β2-adrenoceptor by salmeterol downregulated both β2-adrenoceptor along with the G protein it utilizes: Gαs [39].
The Gαq pathways is characterized by stimulation of PLC, producing intracellular messengers, IP3, and DAG; IP3 evokes a release of calcium from intracellular stores, while DAG recruits protein kinase C (PKC) [7], thereby effecting vasoconstriction. The Gi/o pathway is important since these G proteins can modulate K+channels and inhibit cyclic AMP (cAMP) that modulates calcium [7]. Interestingly, it was shown that 500 μM Hcy treatment for 48 h resulted in a significant decrease in Gi/o content in the cell. Consequently, the ability to inhibit calcium influx within the cell is impaired since this signaling molecule was absent under these conditions. Our results showed a significant decrease in Gα12/13, a protein known to mediate calcium signaling [40–42] content at only 0.5 mM conditions for 48 h. In alignment with our in vitro study, a final study found that Gαq and Gα12 protein levels decreased significantly in CHF [43].
In summary, we were able to witness portions of the classical pathway of GPCR desensitization: an increase in ERK1 activity characteristic of GPCR activation; activation of GRK2 warranting further evidence that Hcy binds to GPCRs and marks them for down regulation; degradation of β-arrestin1, consistent with how Class B GPCRs are down regulated. This provides further evidence that Hcy binds to GPCRs, marked by increased GRK2 activity to evoke the machinery involved in GPCR desensitization; in fact, net G protein content of the following G proteins decreased with various Hcy treatments: Gαq/11, Gα12/13, Gi/o.
Limitations
We did not detect the migration of β-arr-estin1 to the membrane or the attachment of c-Src to β-arrestin1 as a scaffold. However, these proteins are known to migrate to activated, phosphorylated GPCRs. We are also unsure what became of c-Src, but speculate it could be degraded along with β-arrestin-1, or is involved in some other pathway with this consequence. The concentrations of homocyseine required to evoke the greatest significant difference in phosphorylation and/or expression of various signaling proteins was 0.5 mM; however, as low as 75 μM Hcy treatment could produce a significant change in expression of G proteins, such as Gαq/11. The normal plasma concentration in adults is 5–15 μM; only in severe cases do levels reach 100 μM or more.
Acknowledgments
#This research was supported in part by American Heart Association Post-Doctoral training grant (award # 0625579B) to Karni S. Moshal, and NIH Grants HL-71010, HL-74185, HL-88012 and NS-51568 to Suresh C. Tyagi.
References
- 1.Herrmann M, Taban-Shomal O, Hubner U, et al. A review of homocysteine and heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:571–576. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ni M, Zhang XH, Jiang SL, et al. Homocystinemia as an independent risk factor in the Chinese population at a high risk of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:455–458. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gibelin P, Serre S, Candito M, et al. Prognostic value of homocysteinemia in patients with congestive heart failure. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(7):813–816. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rasouli L, Nasir K, Blumenthal R, et al. Plasma homocysteine predicts progression of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2005;181:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Joseph J, Lija J, Shekhart N, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia leads to pathological ventricular hypertrophy in normotensive rats. Am J Phsyiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H679–H686. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00145.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moshal KS, Sen U, Tyagi N, et al. Regulation of homocysteine-induced MMP-9 by ERK ½ pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Phsyiol. 2005;290:C883–C891. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00359.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Neves Susana, Prahlad Ram, Lyengar Ravi. G protein pathways. Science. 2002;296:1636–1639. doi: 10.1126/science.1071550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Budd DC, Willars GB, McDonald JE. Phosphorylation of the Gq/11-coupled M3-muscarinic receptor is involved in receptor activation of the ERK1/2 mitogen activated protein kinase pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000 November;:1–29. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008827200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shenoy S, Lefkowitz R. Multifaceted roles of B-arrestins in the regulation of seven-membrane-spanning receptor trafficking and signaling. Biochem J. 2003;375:503–515. doi: 10.1042/BJ2003 1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tsao Patricia, Cao Tracy, von Zastrow Mark. Role of endocytosis in mediating downregulation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22(2):91–96. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01620-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Metaye T, Gibelin H, Perdrisot R, et al. Pathophysiological roles of G-protein coupled receptor kinases. Cell Signal. 2005;17:917–928. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Petronila Penela, Murga Cristina, Ribas Catalina, et al. Mechanisms of regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;69(1):46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Menard L, Ferguson S, Zhang J. Synergistic regulation of B2-adrenergic receptor sequestration: intracellular complement of B-adrenergic receptor kinase and B-arrestin determine kinetics of internalization. Mol Pharmacol. 1997;51:800–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.DeWire SM, Ahn S, Lefkowitz RJ, Shenoy SK. β-Arrestins and Cell Signaling. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:483–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.022405.154749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shenoy S, Lefkowitz R. Seven-transmembrane receptor signaling through B-arrestin. Sci STKE. 2005 November;:1–4. doi: 10.1126/stke.2005/308/cm10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dalle Stephane, Imamura Takeshi, Rose David, et al. Insulin induces heterologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor and insulin-like growth factor I signaling by downregulating B-arrestin1. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(17):6272–6285. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.17.6272-6285.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miller William E, Maudsley Stuart, Ahn Seungkirl, Khan KhudaDad, et al. β-arrestin1 interacts with the catalytic domain of the tyrosine kinase c-SRC. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(15):11312–11319. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fessart D, Simaan M, Laporte S. c-Src regulates clathrin adapter protein2 interaction with B-arrestin and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor during clathrin-mediated internalization. Mol Endocrinol. 2005;19(2):491–503. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fleming I. Bobbing along crest wave. Circ Res. 2003;93:9–11. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000082769.87973.B9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blayney L, Gapper P, Newby A. Vasoconstrictor agonists activate G-protein-dependent receptor-operated calcium channels in pig aortic microsomes. Biochem J. 1992;282:81–84. doi: 10.1042/bj2820081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen GF, Suzuki H. Calcium dependency of the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in smooth muscle cells of the rabbit carotid artery. J Physiol. 1990;421:521–534. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pticher J, Tesmer J, Freeman J. Feedback inhibition of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) activity by extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(49):34531–34534. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.49.34531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang Jianyun, Sun Yutong, Huang Xin-Yun. Distinct roles for Src tyrosine kinase in B2-adrenergic receptor signaling to MAPK and in receptor internalization. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(20):21637–21642. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400956200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moshal KS, Zeldin DC, Sithu SD, Sen U, Tyagi N. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2J2 gene transfection attenuates MMP-9 via inhibition of NF-kappabeta in hyperhomocysteinemia. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215(3):771–781. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moshal KS, Singh M, Sen U, Rosenberger DS. Homocysteine-mediated activation and mitochondrial translocation of calpain regulates MMP-9 in MVEC. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291(6):H2825–H2835. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00377.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Matkovich S, Diwan A, Klanke J, et al. Cardiac-specific ablation of G-protein receptor kinase 2 redefines its roles in heart development and B-adrenergic signaling. Circ Res. 2006;99:996–1003. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000247932.71270.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lymperopoulos Anastasios, Rengo Giuseppe, Funakoshi Hajime, et al. Adrenal GRK2 upregulation mediates sympathetic overdrive in heart failure. Nat Med. 2007;13(3):315–323. doi: 10.1038/nm1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hata J, Koch W. GPCR kinases in heart disease. Mol Interv. 2003 August;:264–272. doi: 10.1124/mi.3.5.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Krasel C, Dammeier S, Winstel R, Brockmann J, Mischak H, Lohse MJ. Phosphorylation of GRK2 by protein kinase C abolishes its inhibition by calmodulin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(3):1911–1915. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008773200. Epub 2000 Oct 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen Li, Huang Li-YenMae. Protein kinase C reduces Mg2+ block of NMDA-receptor channels as a mechanism of modulation. Nature. 1992;356:521–523. doi: 10.1038/356521a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lipton SA, Kim WK, Choi YB, Kumar S, D’Emilia DM, Rayudu PV, Arnelle DR, Stamler JS. Neurotoxicity associated with dual actions of homocysteine at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(11):5923–5928. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ren Xiu-Rong, Reiter Eric, Ahn Seungkirl, et al. Different G protein-coupled receptor kinases goern G protein and B-arrestin-mediated signaling of V2 vasopressin receptor. PNAS. 2005;102(5):1448–1453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409534102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hupfeld C, Resnik J, Ugi S, et al. Insulin-induced B-arrestin1 Ser-412 Phosphorylation is a mechanism for desensitization of ERK activation by Galphai-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(2):1016–1023. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403674200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lin F-T, Chen W, Shenoy S, et al. Phosphorylation of B-arrestin2 regulates its function in internalization of B2-adrenergic receptors. Biochemistry. 2002;41:10692–10699. doi: 10.1021/bi025705n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lin F-T, Miller W, Luttrell L, et al. Feedback regulation of B-arrestin1 function by extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(23):15971–15974. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.23.15971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.BioCarta. [Accessed August 1 2008];B-arrestins in GPCR Desensitization. 2008 Available via DIALOG http://www.biocarta.com/pathfiles/m_bArrestinPathway.asp.
- 37.Davidson L, Pawson AJ, Millar RP, Maudsley S. Cytoskeletal reorganization dependence of signaling by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(3):1980–1993. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309827200. Epub 2003 Oct 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hynes Thomas, Mervine Stacy, Yost Evan, et al. Live cell imaging of Gs and the beta2-adrenergic receptor demonstrates that both alphas and beta1gamma7 internalize upon stimulation and exhibit similar trafficking patterns that differ from that of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(42):44101–44112. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405151200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Allen J, Yu J, Donati R, et al. Beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation promotes G alpha s internalization through lipid rafts: a study in living cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(5):1493–1504. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.008342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Finney P, Donnelly L, Belvisi M, et al. Chronic systemic administration of salmeterol to rats promotes pulmonary beta2-adrenoceptor desensitization and down-regulation of G alpha s. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132:1261–1270. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klages Birgit, Brandt Ursula, Simon Melvin, et al. Activation of G12/G13 results in shape change and Rho/Rho-Kinase-mediated myosin light chain phosphorylation in mouse platelets. J Cell Biol. 1999;144(4):745–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wettschureck N, Offermanns S. Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. Physiol Rev. 2005;85(4):1159–1204. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gohla A, Schultz G, Offermanns S. Role for G12/G13 in agonist-induced vascular smooth muscle cell contraction. Circ Res. 2000;87:221–227. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.3.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







