Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1989 Oct;27(10):2300–2304. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2300-2304.1989

Visuwell Reagin, a non-treponemal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the serodiagnosis of syphilis.

T J White 1, S A Fuller 1
PMCID: PMC267013  PMID: 2584380

Abstract

A urease-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been developed for the detection of reagin antibodies in serum. Visuwell Reagin (ADI Diagnostics Inc., Rexdale, Ontario, Canada) is a non-treponemal screening test for the serodiagnosis of syphilis which has the benefits of large batch testing, automatability, and objective interpretation of results. Unheated, undiluted sera are incubated in 96-well microtiter plates coated with a modified cardiolipin-lecithin-cholesterol antigen. Antibody bound to the plate is detected by an anti-human immunoglobulin G-urease conjugate. The procedure consists of three steps, with a total test time of 60 min. Visuwell Reagin ELISA was compared with the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and the reagin screening test (RST) with the following results. For ELISA versus the VDRL test, the sensitivities for untreated syphilis (n = 37) were 97.3% for both ELISA and the VDRL test, the confirmatory positive values (n = 79) were 84.8% for ELISA and 72.2% for the VDRL test, and the specificities for normal samples (n = 1,327) were 98.8% for ELISA and 99.5% for the VDRL test. For ELISA versus RST, the sensitivities for untreated syphilis (n = 57) were 94.7% for ELISA and 87.7% for RST, the confirmatory positive values (n = 26) were 96.2% for ELISA and 92.3% for RST, and the specificities for normal samples (n = 1,891) were 99.6% for ELISA and 99.3% for RST. The overall concordance values of ELISA with VDRL test and RST were 96.7 and 97.9%, respectively. The specificity of ELISA compared with that of RST may be underestimated, since confirmatory data were not available for all apparent false-positive samples. Visuwell Reagin had increased sensitivity and similar specificity compared with flocculation tests.

Full text

PDF
2300

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chairez R., Schleicher J. B., Cesario A. J. Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunoassay with an indirect hemagglutination assay for the detection of antibodies to cytomegalovirus. J Virol Methods. 1984 Oct;9(2):153–161. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(84)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandler H. M., Cox J. C., Healey K., MacGregor A., Premier R. R., Hurrell J. G. An investigation of the use of urease-antibody conjugates in enzyme immunoassays. J Immunol Methods. 1982 Sep 17;53(2):187–194. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(82)90140-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. March R. W., Stiles G. E. The reagin screen test: a new reagin card test for syphilis. Sex Transm Dis. 1980 Apr-Jun;7(2):66–70. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198004000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. PORTNOY J., BREWER J. H., HARRIS A. Rapid plasma reagin card test for syphilis and other treponematoses. Public Health Rep. 1962 Aug;77:645–652. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pedersen N. S., Orum O., Mouritsen S. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to the venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) antigen in syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Sep;25(9):1711–1716. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1711-1716.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pettit D. E., Larsen S. A., Harbec P. S., Feeley J. C., Parham C. E., Cruce D. D., Hambie E. A., Perryman M. W. Toluidine red unheated serum test, a nontreponemal test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1141–1145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1141-1145.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pettit D. E., Larsen S. A., Pope V., Perryman M. W., Adams M. R. Unheated serum reagin test as a quantitative test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):238–242. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.238-242.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuurs A. H., Van Weemen B. K. Enzyme-immunoassay. Clin Chim Acta. 1977 Nov 15;81(1):1–40. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(77)90410-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES