Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2009 Apr 1;9:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-39

Seroprevalence and factors associated with herpes simplex virus type 2 among HIV-negative high-risk men who have sex with men from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a cross-sectional study

Junia Rodrigues 1, Beatriz Grinsztejn 1,, Francisco I Bastos 2, Luciane Velasque 1, Paula M Luz 1, Claudia TV de Souza 1, Ingebourg Georg 1, Jose H Pilotto 1, Valdilea G Veloso 1
PMCID: PMC2670309  PMID: 19335922

Abstract

Background

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is the leading cause of genital ulcer disease in developing countries, including Brazil, and is especially prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM). HSV-2 infection represents a risk factor for the acquisition and transmission of other sexually transmitted diseases. The goal of the present cross-sectional study was to estimate HSV-2 seroprevalence and to determine the factors associated with HSV-2 seropositivity in HIV-negative high-risk MSM from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Methods

Stored sera were tested to estimate HSV-2 seroprevalence, while socio-demographic and sexual behavior data were used to measure associations between risk factors and HSV-2 seropositivity. Using the Poisson regression model with robust variance, prevalence ratios (PR) were used to estimate de degree of association between risk factors and HSV-2 seropositivity in bivariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Seroprevalence of HSV-2 was of 45.7% (184 out of 403). Factors independently associated with HSV-2 seroprevalence in the multivariate model were: older age (≥ 26 years, PR: 1.41 95% Confidence Interval: 1.11–1.78), non-white race (PR: 1.32 95%CI: 1.06–1.64), positive serology for syphilis (PR: 1.65 95%CI: 1.33–2.05), positive serology for hepatitis B (PR: 1.25 95%CI: 0.99–1.57), stable male partner in the past 6 months (PR: 1.42 95%CI: 1.12–1.79), and unprotected anal sex with a stable female partner (PR: 1.46 95%CI: 1.05–2.04) in the 6 months preceding the cross-sectional assessment.

Conclusion

The present study made evident a high prevalence of HSV-2 infection in a sample of HIV-negative high-risk MSM from Rio de Janeiro. This finding indicates the need and urgency for implementing integrated programs for the prevention of HSV-2 and other sexually transmitted diseases, and, in particular, programs targeting high-risk MSM.

Background

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is the leading cause of genital ulcer disease worldwide, and the main etiological agent of genital herpes [1-3]. Although HSV-2 causes anal-genital vesicles and ulcers that can be severe and recurrent, most infections are asymptomatic with intermittent genital excretion of the virus [4-6]. Transmission of HSV-2 to a sexual partner occurs within the whole clinical spectrum of this infection, i.e., in the presence of clinical manifestations, during subclinical episodes and even during periods of asymptomatic virus excretion [7,8]. HSV-2 is most frequently transmitted through the contact with skin or mucosal lesions, or through genital or oral secretions. Although contact with ulcerated lesions is the most common route of transmission, contact with asymptomatic patients can also lead to virus transmission [6,8,9].

HSV-2 infection represents a risk factor for the acquisition and transmission of other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) [3,10-12]. Observational epidemiological studies have shown that HSV-2 facilitates the acquisition and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a fact that indicates the relevance of the pathogenesis and epidemiology of HSV-2 [2,5,13-16]. Despite its importance, data on the seroprevalence of HSV-2 in different populations are still limited when compared to other STDs, especially in developing countries. Most published data are derived from female populations or from patients seen at STD clinics which are considered to be at higher risk of infection with HSV-2 than the general population [17]. Among men who have sex with men (MSM), reported seroprevalences of HSV-2 vary as a function of HIV status: high (80%) seroprevalences are observed among those co-infected with HIV [18,19] while lower (20%–50%) seroprevalences are reported for those not infected with HIV [20-23].

Significant progress in the understanding of HSV-2 infection has occurred due to the development of highly sensitive and specific serological tests (for the detection of HSV type-specific antibodies) [4]. These tests permit the identification of antibodies specific to HSV-2 [2]. The goal of the present cross-sectional study was to estimate HSV-2 seroprevalence and to determine the factors associated with HSV-2 seropositivity among HIV-negative high-risk MSM from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Methods

Study population and study design

A total of 1165 MSM were interviewed at the Evandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute (IPEC), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, between January 1994 and December 1998, to evaluate eligibility to the open cohort of HIV-negative individuals ('Projeto Rio', [24]). Cohort eligibility criteria were men aged from 18 to 50 years who engaged in sexual activity with other men and who were HIV-negative at enrollment [25]. 'Projeto Rio' was conceived to estimate important epidemiological measurements, including HIV prevalence and incidence rates, and to prepare local infrastructure for future HIV/STD interventions [24]. The project was funded by the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Joint Program on AIDS (UNAIDS), and the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Additional information on cohort's methods, procedures and aims are available elsewhere [24]. Several studies have been published on data generated through 'Projeto Rio', including HIV incidence rates [25], risk behavior and perception of HIV vulnerability [26], illicit drug use [27], and willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials [28].

A total of 647 MSM met the eligibility criteria of 'Projeto Rio' thus effectively enrolling in the cohort. At study entry, participants had a blood sample drawn (for HIV, hepatitis B and syphilis testing) and responded to a social and behavioral questionnaire which was administered by a trained psychologist [24]. The present study evaluated HSV-2 seroprevalence for the 403 MSM who first enrolled in 'Projeto Rio'.

Laboratory procedures

The 403 serum samples obtained at enrollment and stored frozen at the Laboratory of Immunology of IPEC (the original serum bank of 'Projeto Rio') were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of IgG class antibodies to HSV-2 glycoprotein G2 (HerpeSelect, Focus Technologies, Cypress, CA). HSV-2 seropositivity was defined by a reactive ELISA with an index ratio ≥ 3.5 in order to increase the specificity of the assay [29-31].

Syphilis testing was performed using two serological assays: the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test and the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA). Using both assays, two variables were defined: (1) active syphilis when antibody titer with the VDRL test was ≥ 1/8 and the TPHA was positive, and (2) positive serology for syphilis when the VDRL test was not reactive or < 1/8 and TPHA was positive. Positive serology for hepatitis B was assessed by the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBC) indicating previous infection.

Statistical analyses

Factors potentially associated with HSV-2 seropositivity were explored including covariates and confounders previously identified as being related to HSV-2 seropositivity among MSM. Due to the high prevalence of HSV-2 among participants prevalence ratios (PR) were used to estimate the degree of association between HSV-2 infection and potential factors [32]. Using a Poisson regression model with robust variance [32], associations were first evaluated in bivariate analysis. Covariates found to be associated with HSV-2 assuming a threshold level of significance of 0.20 were included in the initial multivariate Poisson regression model. The final multivariate Poisson regression model was reached by stepwise removal of covariates not significantly associated with the outcome, starting with the variable with the highest p-value. Covariates with borderline association for which clinical and/or biological relevance was assumed were kept in the final model. Interactions identified during the modeling process were evaluated in subsequent models; no interaction remained in the final model. Stata Corporation for Windows, version 7.0, was used for the statistical analyses.

Ethical approval

Written approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of IPEC, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, in order to conduct the HSV-2 serological test on the stored sera. This procedure complies with the National Health Council regulation on research conducted on stored samples.

Results

The mean and median age of the 403 men was 27.5 (standard error: 7.3 years) and 26 years (interquartile range: 18–49 years), respectively. One hundred and eighty eight (47.2%) men reported 8 years of formal education or less, 251 (66.6%) received 3 minimal-wages or less, and 266 (67.3%) were working (Table 1). Only 38 (9.4%) men reported living with a partner and 339 (84.3%) reported being single.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the HIV-negative high-risk MSM that participated in the cross-sectional study.

Characteristic Number* (%)
Age
< 21 79 (19.6)
21–30 195 (48.4)
> 30 129 (32.0)

Race
White 205 (52.4)
Non-white 186 (47.6)

Educational level
≤ 8 years 188 (47.2)
> 8 years 210 (52.8)

Monthly income
None 50 (13.3)
1–3 minimal wages 201 (53.3)
> 3 minimal wages 126 (33.4)

Working
No 129 (32.7)
Yes 266 (67.3)

Living with
Parents or relatives 215 (53.3)
Alone 82 (20.3)
Partner 38 (9.4)
Friend 33 (8.2)
Wife and children 19 (4.7)
Others 16 (4.0)

Marital status
Single 339 (84.3)
Married 27 (6.7)
Divorced 14 (3.5)
Other 22 (5.5)

*Totals by characteristic vary because of missing values.

One hundred and eighty one men (45.5%) self identified themselves as MSM, while 217 (54.5%) self identified themselves as bisexuals (Table 2). The reported age at first sexual intercourse was less than 16 years for 272 (68.7%) of the men (interquartile range: 12–16 years), the median age at first sexual intercourse did not differ by the gender of the partner. The first sexual intercourse occurred with a woman for 307 (76.2%) of the men. Thirty eight percent of the men reporting sex with women at least once in their lives had their first sex act with another man. More than half of the participants reported having a stable male partner in the past six months (228, 56.6%), and, during this period, unprotected anal sex with a stable male partner was reported by 136 (33.7%) men. Also for the previous six months, 267 (66.3%) men reported having an occasional male partner, and, during this period, unprotected anal sex with an occasional partner was reported by 222 (55.1%) men. Sex with a woman in the past six months was reported by 101 (25.1%) men. Unprotected vaginal sex with a stable and an occasional female partner was reported by 71 (18.3%) and 51 (13.1%) men, respectively. During sexual encounters happening in the past six months, 202 (52.9%) men reported alcohol consumption, while 41 (11.3%) reported cocaine use.

Table 2.

Behavioral characteristics and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases among the HIV-negative high-risk MSM that participated in the cross-sectional study.

Characteristic Number* (%)
Sexual orientation
Homosexual 181 (45.5)
Bisexual 217 (54.5)

Age at first sexual intercourse
< 12 82 (20.7)
12–15 190 (48.0)
16–18 90 (22.7)
> 18 34 (8.6)

Age at first sexual intercourse with man
< 12 33 (13.3)
12–15 76 (30.5)
16–18 83 (33.3)
> 18 57 (22.9)

Age at first sexual intercourse with woman
< 12 16 (6.3)
12–15 120 (47.2)
16–18 87 (34.3)
> 18 31 (12.2)

First sexual intercourse with
Man 96 (23.8)
Woman 307 (76.2)

Exchange of sex for money
Never 228 (56.6)
Sometimes 175 (43.4)

Sex with a woman
Never 140 (34.7)
Sometimes 263 (65.3)

Sex with a woman in the past 6 months
Yes 101/403 (25.1)

Occasional male partner in the past 6 months
Yes 267/403 (66.3)

Stable male partner in the past 6 months
Yes 228/403 (56.6)

Unprotected anal sex with stable male partner in the past 6 months
Yes 136/403 (33.7)

Unprotected anal sex with occasional male partner in the past 6 months
Yes 222/403 (55.1)

Unprotected vaginal sex with stable female partner in the past 6 months
Yes 71/388 (18.3)

Unprotected anal sex with stable female partner in the past 6 months
Yes 34/390 (8.7)

Unprotected vaginal sex with occasional female partner in the past 6 months
Yes 51/390 (13.1)

Unprotected anal sex with occasional female partner in the past 6 months
Yes 36/389 (9.3)

Alcohol use during sexual encounter in the past 6 months
Yes 202/382 (52.9)

Cocaine use during sexual encounter in the past 6 months
Yes 41/362 (11.3)

Herpes simplex virus type 2
Yes 184/403 (45.7)

Active syphilis**
Yes 31/403 (7.7)

Positive serology for syphilis**
Yes 140/403 (34.7)

Positive serology for Hepatitis B***
Yes 134/403 (33.3)

* Totals by characteristic vary because of missing values. Totals are given next to the number for "No/Yes" dichotomous variables.

** Active syphilis implies that the antibody titer with the VDRL test was ≥ 1/8 and the TPHA was positive, while positive serology for syphilis implies that the VDRL test was not reactive or < 1/8 and TPHA was positive.

*** Positive serology for hepatitis B was assessed by the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBC) indicating previous infection.

The point prevalence of HSV-2 was 45.7% (184 out of 403 men, 95% confidence interval: 39.3–53.7%, Table 2). Active syphilis was detected in 31 (7.7%) men and positive serology for syphilis was detected in 140 (34.7%) men. Positive serology for hepatitis B was detected in 134 (33.3%) men.

In the bivariate analysis (Table 3), demographic factors most strongly associated with HSV-2 seropositivity were: older age (≥ 26 years, PR: 1.54 95% Confidence Interval: 1.24–1.92), non-white race (PR: 1.36 95%CI: 1.09–1.70), and living with a partner (PR: 1.41 95%CI: 1.14–1.37). Among behavioral risk factors, younger age at first sexual intercourse with a man (= 15 years PR: 1.28 95%CI: 1.00–1.63), and unprotected anal sex with stable partner in the past 6 months, irrespective of the gender of the partner (PR: 1.20 95%CI: 0.97–1.49 for male partner and PR: 1.46 95%CI: 1.11–1.93 for female partner), were significantly associated with HSV-2 seroprevalence. Positive serology for syphilis (PR: 1.75 95%CI: 1.43–2.15) and hepatitis B (PR: 1.65 95%CI: 1.33–2.05) were also significantly associated with HSV-2 seropositivity.

Table 3.

Factors associated with herpes simplex virus type-2 seropositivity in the bivariate analysis among the HIV-negative high-risk MSM that participated in the cross-sectional study.

Characteristic PR 95%CI p-value
Age
≤ 26 1.00
> 26 1.54 1.24–1.92 < 0.001

Race
White 1.00
Non-white 1.36 1.09–1.70 0.005

Educational level
≤ 8 years 1.16 0.93–1.45 0.16
> 8 years 1.00

Working
No 1.00
Yes 1.07 0.84–1.35 0.553

Living with a partner
Yes 1.41 1.14–1.37 0.001
No 1.00

Marital status
Not married 1.00
Married 1.05 0.96–1.15 0.264

Sexual orientation
Homosexual 1.00
Bisexual 1.04 0.83–1.29 0.708

Age at first sexual intercourse
≤ 15 years 1.21 0.94–1.56 0.122
> 15 years 1.00

Age at first sexual intercourse with man
≤ 15 years 1.28 1.00–1.63 0.045
> 15 years 1.00

Age at first sexual intercourse with woman
≤ 15 years 1.05 0.82–1.33 0.683
> 15 years 1.00

First sexual intercourse with
Man 1.05 0.86–1.39 0.448
Woman 1.00

Exchange of sex for money
Never 1.00
Sometimes 1.09 0.88–1.35 0.407

Sex with a woman
Never 1.00
Sometimes 1.08 0.85–1.37 0.499

Sex with a woman in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.02 0.82–1.28 0.82

Occasional male partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.1 0.87–1.39 0.394

Stable male partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.27 1.02–1.60 0.032

Unprotected anal sex with stable male partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.2 0.97–1.49 0.088

Unprotected anal sex with occasional male partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 0.86 0.67–1.10 0.236

Unprotected vaginal sex with stable female partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.17 0.90–1.51 0.223

Unprotected anal sex with stable female partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.46 1.11–1.93 0.006

Unprotected vaginal sex with occasional female partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 0.83 0.57–1.19 0.313

Unprotected anal sex with occasional female partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 0.7 0.43–1.12 0.142

Alcohol use during sexual encounter in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.21 0.97–1.52 0.085

Active syphilis*
No 1.00
Yes 1.3 0.94–1.79 0.107

Positive serology for syphilis*
No 1.00
Yes 1.75 1.43–2.15 < 0.001

Hepatitis B**
No 1.00
Yes 1.65 1.33–2.05 < 0.001

* Active syphilis implies that the antibody titer with the VDRL test was ≥ 1/8 and the TPHA was positive, while positive serology for syphilis implies that the VDRL test was not reactive or < 1/8 and TPHA was positive.

** Positive serology for hepatitis B was assessed by the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBC) indicating previous infection.

In the multivariate model (Table 4), factors independently associated with HSV-2 seroprevalence were: older age (= 26 years, PR: 1.41 95%CI: 1.11–1.78), non-white race (PR: 1.32 95%CI: 1.06–1.64), positive serology for syphilis (PR: 1.65 95%CI: 1.33–2.05), and hepatitis B (PR: 1.25 95%CI: 0.99–1.57). From the behavioral factors evaluated, those that remained independently associated with HSV-2 seropositivity were stable male partner in the past 6 months (PR: 1.42 95%CI: 1.12–1.79), unprotected anal sex with a stable female partner in the 6 months preceding the baseline interview (PR: 1.46 95%CI: 1.05–2.04).

Table 4.

Factors associated with herpes simplex virus type-2 seropositivity in the final multivariate model among the HIV-negative high-risk MSM that participated in the cross-sectional study.

Characteristic PR 95%CI p-value
Age
≤ 26 1.00
> 26 1.41 1.11–1.78 0.004

Race
White 1.00
Non-white 1.32 1.06–1.64 0.011

Stable male partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.42 1.12–1.79 0.003

Unprotected anal sex with stable female partner in the past 6 months
No 1.00
Yes 1.46 1.05–2.04 0.023

Positive serology for syphilis*
No 1.00
Yes 1.65 1.33–2.05 < 0.001

Hepatitis B**
No 1.00
Yes 1.25 0.99–1.57 0.053

* Active syphilis implies that the antibody titer with the VDRL test was ≤ 1/8 and the TPHA was positive, while positive serology for syphilis implies that the VDRL test was not reactive or < 1/8 and TPHA was positive.

** Positive serology for hepatitis B was assessed by the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBC) indicating previous infection.

Discussion

The present study made evident a high prevalence of HSV-2 infection (45.7%) in this sample of HIV-negative high-risk MSM from Rio de Janeiro. This result is consistent with other studies conducted among MSM from other countries and in Brazil as well [18,23,33-35]. This finding indicates the need and urgency for implementing integrated programs for the prevention of HSV-2 and other STDs, and, in particular, programs targeting high-risk MSM. HSV-2 is the STD most frequently associated with the genesis of genital ulcer disease in developing countries, including Brazil [3,36,37], and is especially prevalent among MSM [21].

The median age of the studied population was 26 years and chronological age was found to be independently associated with HSV-2 infection. This finding is consistent with published results of other investigators made within the national and international context [4,21,34,38]. The risk of contracting HSV-2 infection shows a practically linear increase with age [39-44], probably reflecting a higher chance of acquiring HSV-2 given a longer exposure time (cumulative exposure) and not an increased susceptibility to infection as a function of age or alterations in immunity as a result of aging, such as observed for other infections/diseases [16,45]. In addition, HSV-2 infection is persistent and, therefore, no spontaneous elimination of the virus occurs [6].

In agreement with the findings of other investigators [1,4,20,21,40,43], non-white race was an independent predictor of HSV-2 seropositivity. This result probably relates to current or historical factors, including racial and ethnic differences associated with poverty, access to health services, behaviors and practices related to health in general and to the sex and age composition of different population strata, and patterns of sexual behavior and affective interaction [1,12]. The high seroprevalence among non-whites strongly suggests that the transmission of HSV-2 infection is influenced by factors other than those related to individual sexual behavior, i.e. by contextual and social factors as mentioned above [40].

Among the variables related to sexual behavior, stable male partner and unprotected anal sex with stable female partner were found associated with HSV-2 seropositivity. These findings could be related to characteristics which are central to the transmission of HSV-2, contributing to the cumulative risk of HSV-2 exposure, which are: repeated exposure in stable affective relationships and the lack of condom use in these stable relationships as repeatedly reported in different behavioral studies [46-48]. The systematic use of condoms is not a common practice among stable partners due to their proximity and intimacy, with protective methods often being considered as impairment to emotional involvement and mutual trust [46-48]. Furthermore, the characteristics of HSV-2 infection, i.e., its chronic and recurrent character [6,8], also contribute to the lack of use of condoms (since, if there is no supposed reason for protection, there is no motivation for the adoption of protective measures).

In the present study, positive serology for syphilis and hepatitis B were associated with HSV-2 seropositivity, and remained independently associated with HSV-2 seropositivity in the multivariate model. Several studies have shown that a history of another (hypothetically previous) STD represents an independent predictor of HSV-2 seropositivity [4,23,40,49]. Specifically with respect to syphilis, positive serology has been independently associated with the acquisition of HSV-2 [41]. The association with syphilis may suggest a residual confounding factor in terms of underlying sexual behaviors and/or HSV-2 infection as a cofactor in syphilis transmission (that is, an inverse association). That is, although the association between HSV-2 infection and other STDs probably reflects common behavioral risk factors, the possibility of biological interactions between different infections also exists [3,12]. It is possible that syphilis is a cofactor associated with a higher excretion of HSV-2 or with a higher susceptibility to the latter infection as documented for HIV infection [10]. However, in the present study the simultaneous analysis of possible risk factors and outcomes prevents any inference regarding the direction and possible temporal sequence of the observed associations.

It is well known that the cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the baseline interview of a cohort does not allow for the establishment of causal relationships since the reverse causality of the observed associations cannot be ruled out (unless, of course, the reverse association is biologically impossible). However, the central questions of this study mainly benefit from the careful analysis of the statistical associations as long as they are interpreted in view of the pertinent literature.

In the present study behavioral information was obtained through self-report. Social and psychological factors may influence answers given to sensitive questions, such as the sexual behavior and condom use. However, evidence suggests that well-designed questionnaires provide acceptable data when administered in an appropriate manner [50]. In this study, questionnaires were applied by a study psychologist [24].

The population of 403 men included in this study corresponds to only 62% of all eligible men and the findings therefore cannot be extrapolated to all high-risk MSM who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of 'Projeto Rio'. Moreover, although our results are consistent with other studies conducted among MSM [33-35], our findings also do not necessarily apply to the whole MSM population of Rio de Janeiro or Brazil. Indeed, our population is composed of high-risk individuals who were sought out to participate in a prospective HIV seroincidence cohort. It is possible that these first 403 men were at higher risk of HSV-2 when compared to those that later entered the study. If this were true, our results would be over-estimating the HSV-2 seroprevalence. In contrast, it is also possible that the first 403 men represented an inverse selection bias, that is, were indeed more healthy than the remaining participants, and thus our results could be under-estimating the HSV-2 seroprevalence. The basis for this reasoning is the recruitment strategy of the study which sought participants outside the health care clinic environment and independent of clinical symptoms. That is, although the individuals were not ill they agreed to participate in the study, possibly indicating that they were concerned with their health.

The present study analyzes secondary data retrospectively, i.e., the original study was designed with other purposes [24]. Accordingly, a more detailed investigation of specific risk factors for HSV-2 seropositivity, such as the presence or absence of signs or symptoms of herpes in the partner of the participant, the number of partners the participant had throughout life and the occurrence and duration of herpes infection in the participant, was not possible.

However, the present study profits from the use of statistical methods tailored at the high prevalence of the event under analysis. Although the logistic regression model and the calculation of the respective odds ratios are the most frequent approaches used in prevalence studies, in the present investigation we used the Poisson regression model since it allows for the direct estimation of the prevalence ratio. This is the proper approach when the basic assumption underlying the use of logistic models, i.e., the rarity of the event analyzed, is violated. In contrast to the logistic regression model, which overestimates the effective prevalence ratio in these cases, the Poisson model yields adequate estimates. Finally, it was necessary to use a method of robust variance estimation in the application of the Poisson model for better fit [32].

This study made evident a high seroprevalence of HSV-2 among high-risk MSM. This high seroprevalence is a matter of concern for healthcare workers and clinicians, and represents a challenge with respect to the establishment of preventive and control measures. The control and prevention of HSV-2 infection is a growing public health concern because of its infectivity, persistence, and role as a cofactor in the transmission and acquisition of other STDs, including HIV [2,3,5,6,8,10,13]. Also, the costs resulting from HSV-2 infection are significant [11]. Acknowledgment of the burden of HSV-2 is needed in order to appropriately address the control and prevention of this disease and its associated co-morbidities.

Conclusion

Seroprevalence of HSV-2 among HIV-negative high-risk men was of 45.7%. Factors independently associated with HSV-2 seroprevalence were: older age (= 26 years, PR: 1.41 95% CI: 1.11–1.78), non-white race (PR: 1.32 95%CI: 1.06–1.64), positive serology for syphilis (PR: 1.65 95%CI: 1.33–2.05), positive serology for hepatitis B (PR: 1.25 95%CI: 0.99–1.57), stable male partner in the past 6 months (PR: 1.42 95%CI: 1.12–1.79), and unprotected anal sex with a stable female partner (PR: 1.46 95%CI: 1.05–2.04) in the 6 months preceding the cross-sectional assessment.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

BG, JHP and VGV conceived, designed and coordinated the study, guided the discussion of the results, and drafted the manuscript. JR retrieved the data and participated in the statistical analysis and in the discussion of the results. FIB participated in the study design and in the discussion of the results. LV performed the statistical analysis and participated in the discussion of the results. PML participated in the statistical analysis, in the discussion of the results, and in the writing of the manuscript. CTS was responsible for the cross-sectional data used in this study. IG performed the herpes serologic testing and participated in the interpretation of results. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/39/prepub

Contributor Information

Junia Rodrigues, Email: junia.rodrigues@gmail.com.

Beatriz Grinsztejn, Email: gbeatriz@ipec.fiocruz.br.

Francisco I Bastos, Email: chicao29@hotmail.com.

Luciane Velasque, Email: velasque@fiocruz.br.

Paula M Luz, Email: paula.luz@ipec.fiocruz.br.

Claudia TV de Souza, Email: clau@cpqhec.fiocruz.br.

Ingebourg Georg, Email: inge@ipec.fiocruz.br.

Jose H Pilotto, Email: jose.pilotto@ipec.fiocruz.br.

Valdilea G Veloso, Email: vgveloso@ipec.fiocruz.br.

Acknowledgements

B. Grinsztejn acknowledges funding from the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) and the Research Funding Agency of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ). The authors are grateful to Dr Frits Sutmöler for lending the serum bank and data used in this study.

References

  1. Fleming DT, McQuillan GM, Johnson RE, Nahmias AJ, Aral SO, Lee FK, St Louis ME. Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(16):1105–1111. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wald A, Link K. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in herpes simplex virus type 2-seropositive persons: a meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2002;185(1):45–52. doi: 10.1086/338231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wald A, Corey L, Handsfield HH, Holmes KK. Influence of HIV infection on manifestations and natural history of other sexually transmitted diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:19–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh AE, Romanowski B, Wong T, Gourishankar S, Myziuk L, Fenton J, Preiksaitis JK. Herpes simplex virus seroprevalence and risk factors in 2 Canadian sexually transmitted disease clinics. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(2):95–100. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000151415.78210.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wald A, Corey L. How does herpes simplex virus type 2 influence human immunodeficiency virus infection and pathogenesis? J Infect Dis. 2003;187(10):1509–1512. doi: 10.1086/374976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sacks SL, Griffiths PD, Corey L, Cohen C, Cunningham A, Dusheiko GM, Self S, Spruance S, Stanberry LR, Wald A. HSV shedding. Antiviral Res. 2004;63(Suppl 1):S19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2004.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wald A, Zeh J, Selke S, Ashley RL, Corey L. Virologic characteristics of subclinical and symptomatic genital herpes infections. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(12):770–775. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509213331205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sacks SL, Griffiths PD, Corey L, Cohen C, Cunningham A, Dusheiko GM, Self S, Spruance S, Stanberry LR, Wald A. HSV-2 transmission. Antiviral Res. 2004;63(Suppl 1):S27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2004.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lowhagen GB, Jansen E, Nordenfelt E, Lycke E. Epidemiology of genital herpes infections in Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol. 1990;70(4):330–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75(1):3–17. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wasserheit JN. Epidemiological synergy. Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19(2):61–77. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199219020-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wasserheit JN. Effect of changes in human ecology and behavior on patterns of sexually transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(7):2430–2435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Celum C, Levine R, Weaver M, Wald A. Genital herpes and human immunodeficiency virus: double trouble. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(6):447–453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Corey L, Wald A, Celum CL, Quinn TC. The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(5):435–445. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200404150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn JR, Cross PL, Whitworth JA, Hayes RJ. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Aids. 2006;20(1):73–83. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000198081.09337.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Renzi C, Douglas JM Jr, Foster M, Critchlow CW, Ashley-Morrow R, Buchbinder SP, Koblin BA, McKirnan DJ, Mayer KH, Celum CL. Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection as a risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus acquisition in men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(1):19–25. doi: 10.1086/345867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith JS, Herrero R, Munoz N, Eluf-Neto J, Ngelangel C, Bosch FX, Ashley RL. Prevalence and risk factors for herpes simplex virus type 2 infection among middle-age women in Brazil and the Philippines. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(4):187–194. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200104000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lama JR, Lucchetti A, Suarez L, Laguna-Torres VA, Guanira JV, Pun M, Montano SM, Celum CL, Carr JK, Sanchez J. Association of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and syphilis with human immunodeficiency virus infection among men who have sex with men in Peru. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(10):1459–1466. doi: 10.1086/508548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Langenberg A, Benedetti J, Jenkins J, Ashley R, Winter C, Corey L. Development of clinically recognizable genital lesions among women previously identified as having "asymptomatic" herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110(11):882–887. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown EL, Wald A, Hughes JP, Morrow RA, Krantz E, Mayer K, Buchbinder S, Koblin B, Celum C. High risk of human immunodeficiency virus in men who have sex with men with herpes simplex virus type 2 in the EXPLORE study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(8):733–741. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mark HD, Sifakis F, Hylton JB, Celentano DD, Mackellar DA, Valleroy LA, Zenilman J. Sex with women as a risk factor for herpes simplex virus type 2 among young men who have sex with men in Baltimore. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(11):691–695. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000175402.55952.d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mertz GJ, Schmidt O, Jourden JL, Guinan ME, Remington ML, Fahnlander A, Winter C, Holmes KK, Corey L. Frequency of acquisition of first-episode genital infection with herpes simplex virus from symptomatic and asymptomatic source contacts. Sex Transm Dis. 1985;12(1):33–39. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198501000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Santos FC, de Oliveira SA, Setubal S, Camacho LA, Faillace T, Leite JP, Velarde LG. Seroepidemiological study of herpes simplex virus type 2 in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in the city of Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101(3):315–319. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762006000300016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sutmoller F, de Souza CT, Monteiro JC, Penna T. The Rio de Janeiro HIV vaccine site-II. Recruitment strategies and socio-demographic data of a HIV negative homosexual and bisexual male cohort in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997;92(1):39–46. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02761997000100009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sutmoller F, Penna TL, de Souza CT, Lambert J. Human immunodeficiency virus incidence and risk behavior in the 'Projeto Rio': results of the first 5 years of the Rio de Janeiro open cohort of homosexual and bisexual men, 1994–98. Int J Infect Dis. 2002;6(4):259–265. doi: 10.1016/S1201-9712(02)90158-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Souza CT, Bastos FI, Lowndes CM, Szwarcwald CL, dos Santos EM, De Castilho EA, Sutmoller F. Perception of vulnerability to HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual/bisexual men in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation STD/HIV Prevention Group. AIDS Care. 1999;11(5):567–579. doi: 10.1080/09540129947721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Souza CT, Diaz T, Sutmoller F, Bastos FI. The association of socioeconomic status and use of crack/cocaine with unprotected anal sex in a cohort of men who have sex with men in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29(1):95–100. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200201010-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. de Souza CT, Lowndes CM, Szwarcwald CL, Sutmoller F, Bastos FI. Willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials among a sample of men who have sex with men, with and without a history of commercial sex, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS Care. 2003;15(4):539–548. doi: 10.1080/0954012031000134773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ashley RL. Performance and use of HSV type-specific serology test kits. Herpes. 2002;9(2):38–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Golden MR, Ashley-Morrow R, Swenson P, Hogrefe WR, Handsfield HH, Wald A. Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) Western blot confirmatory testing among men testing positive for HSV-2 using the focus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(12):771–777. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000175377.88358.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Laeyendecker O, Henson C, Gray RH, Nguyen RH, Horne BJ, Wawer MJ, Serwadda D, Kiwanuka N, Morrow RA, Hogrefe W. Performance of a commercial, type-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of herpes simplex virus type 2-specific antibodies in Ugandans. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(4):1794–1796. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1794-1796.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Corey L. The current trend in genital herpes. Progress in prevention. Sex Transm Dis. 1994;21(2 Suppl):S38–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Konda KA, Klausner JD, Lescano AG, Leon S, Jones FR, Pajuelo J, Caceres CF, Coates TJ. The epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in low-income urban populations in coastal Peru. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(9):534–541. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000175413.89733.ae. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Laar MJ van de, Termorshuizen F, Slomka MJ, van Doornum GJ, Ossewaarde JM, Brown DW, Coutinho RA, Hoek JA van den. Prevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection: evaluation of behavioural risk factors. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(1):127–134. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ballard RC, Fehler HG, Htun Y, Radebe F, Jensen JS, Taylor-Robinson D. Coexistence of urethritis with genital ulcer disease in South Africa: influence on provision of syndromic management. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(4):274–277. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.4.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Da Rosa-Santos OL, Goncalves Da Silva A, Pereira AC Jr. Herpes simplex virus type 2 in Brazil: seroepidemiologic survey. Int J Dermatol. 1996;35(11):794–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1996.tb02976.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Carvalho M, de Carvalho S, Pannuti CS, Sumita LM, de Souza VA. Prevalence of herpes simplex type 2 antibodies and a clinical history of herpes in three different populations in Campinas City, Brazil. Int J Infect Dis. 1999;3(2):94–98. doi: 10.1016/S1201-9712(99)90016-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cusini M, Cusan M, Parolin C, Scioccati L, Decleva I, Mengoli C, Suligoi B, Palu G. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection among attendees of a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Italy. Italian Herpes Forum. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(5):292–295. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200005000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gottlieb SL, Douglas JM Jr, Schmid DS, Bolan G, Iatesta M, Malotte CK, Zenilman J, Foster M, Baron AE, Steiner JF. Seroprevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in five sexually transmitted-disease clinics. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(10):1381–1389. doi: 10.1086/344317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mihret W, Rinke de Wit TF, Petros B, Mekonnen Y, Tsegaye A, Wolday D, Beyene A, Aklilu M, Sanders E, Fontanet AL. Herpes simplex virus type 2 seropositivity among urban adults in Africa: results from two cross-sectional surveys in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(3):175–181. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200203000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rodriguez AC, Castle PE, Smith JS, Bratti C, Hildesheim A, Schiffman M, Viscidi R, Burk RD, Ashley RL, Castellsague X. A population based study of herpes simplex virus 2 seroprevalence in rural Costa Rica. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79(6):460–465. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.6.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wald A, Koutsky L, Ashley RL, Corey L. Genital herpes in a primary care clinic. Demographic and sexual correlates of herpes simplex type 2 infections. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24(3):149–155. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199703000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Weiss HA, Buve A, Robinson NJ, Van Dyck E, Kahindo M, Anagonou S, Musonda R, Zekeng L, Morison L, Carael M. The epidemiology of HSV-2 infection and its association with HIV infection in four urban African populations. Aids. 2001;15(Suppl 4):S97–108. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200108004-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Reynolds SJ, Risbud AR, Shepherd ME, Zenilman JM, Brookmeyer RS, Paranjape RS, Divekar AD, Gangakhedkar RR, Ghate MV, Bollinger RC. Recent herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and the risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 acquisition in India. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(10):1513–1521. doi: 10.1086/368357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Donovan B, Ross MW. Preventing HIV: determinants of sexual behaviour. Lancet. 2000;355(9218):1897–1901. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02302-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Svenson GR, Ostergren PO, Merlo J, Rastam L. Action control and situational risks in the prevention of HIV and STIs: individual, dyadic, and social influences on consistent condom use in a university population. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(6):515–531. doi: 10.1521/aeap.14.8.515.24111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Williamson NE, Liku J, McLoughlin K, Nyamongo IK, Nakayima F. A qualitative study of condom use among married couples in Kampala, Uganda. Reprod Health Matters. 2006;14(28):89–98. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(06)28268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Martinez MJ, Navarrete N, Santander E, Garmendia ML, Gubelin W. [Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection in two clinics for sexually transmitted diseases in Santiago, Chile] Rev Med Chil. 2005;133(3):302–306. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872005000300005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Weinhardt LS, Forsyth AD, Carey MP, Jaworski BC, Durant LE. Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice. Arch Sex Behav. 1998;27(2):155–180. doi: 10.1023/A:1018682530519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES