Abstract
The standardization of yeast inocula has been identified as an important variable in the performance of reproducible in vitro fungal susceptibility testing. We investigated the precision and accuracy of an electronic particle counter in preparing yeast inocula, with quantitative culture used as a "gold standard." Suspensions of Candida albicans and Torulopsis glabrata standardized with a particle counter at 10(6) counts per ml were highly reproducible when cultured quantitatively (coefficients of variation, 6.7 and 6.8%, respectively). Accuracies of particle counts, compared with those of quantitative culture, were -8.5 and +2.8% for the two species, respectively. Electronic cell counts were highly linear between 5 X 10(6) and 5 X 10(4) CFU/ml (R2 greater than 0.99). Multiple electronic counts of a single suspension of C. albicans had less variation than did multiple quantitative cultures of a suspension of the same organism (coefficients of variation, 2.4 versus 8.9%; P less than 0.01), suggesting that impedance counting is probably more precise than quantitative culture. Electronic particle counters can be used to prepare accurate, reproducible yeast inocula. The method may be more accurate and is more precise than other techniques commonly used to standardize yeast suspensions.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Block E. R., Jennings A. E., Bennett J. E. Variables influencing susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-fluorocytosine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Oct;4(4):392–395. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.4.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brass C., Shainhouse J. Z., Stevens D. A. Variability of agar dilution-replicator method of yeast susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Jun;15(6):763–768. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.6.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calhoun D. L., Roberts G. D., Galgiani J. N., Bennett J. E., Feingold D. S., Jorgensen J., Kobayashi G. S., Shadomy S. Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):298–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.298-301.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiani J. N. Antifungal susceptibility tests. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Dec;31(12):1867–1870. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.12.1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiani J. N., Reiser J., Brass C., Espinel-Ingroff A., Gordon M. A., Kerkering T. M. Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1343–1347. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiant J. N., Stevens D. A. Turbidimetric studies of growth inhibition of yeasts with three drugs: inquiry into inoculum-dependent susceptibility testing, time of onset of drug effect, and implications for current and newer methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):249–254. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kallings L. O., Lantorp K., Gunne I. Counting and assessing the size of bacteria with an automatic particle counter. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1969;76(3):447–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1969.tb03274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Burmeister L., Bartlett M. S., Rinaldi M. G. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437–1441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]