Skip to main content
Translational Oncology logoLink to Translational Oncology
. 2009 May;2(2):84–88. doi: 10.1593/tlo.08226

Polymorphisms of Metabolizing Enzymes and Susceptibility to Ethmoid Intestinal-type Adenocarcinoma in Professionally Exposed Patients1

Elisa Pastore *, Federica Perrone *, Marta Orsenigo *, Luigi Mariani , Clara Millefanti *, Stefano Riccio , Sarah Colombo , Giulio Cantù , Marco A Pierotti §,2, Silvana Pilotti *,2
PMCID: PMC2670575  PMID: 19412423

Abstract

Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) of ethmoid is a rare tumor associated with occupational exposure to wood and leather dusts. Polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes play an important role in gene-environment interactions and may contribute to a high degree of variance in individual susceptibility to cancer risk. The aim of this study was to investigate by polymerase chain reaction the role of polymorphisms at CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genes in 30 ethmoid ITAC patients and 79 healthy donors. The distribution of Thr/Asn genotype at CYP1A1 codon 461 was significantly overrepresented among the patients (23.3%; P = .0422), whereas the Ile/Val genotype at CYP1A1 codon 462 was not significantly different between cases and controls (P = .76). The GSTM1 null genotype was not significantly different between cases and control (P = 1), but we observed that the combined codon 461 Thr/Asn and GSTM1 null genotype was overrepresented in the patient group (P = .0019). The results reveal that patients with CYP1A1 codon 461 polymorphism may be at high genetic risk of ITAC and that the risk increases in the presence of combined polymorphism of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 null genotype. This strongly suggests that CYP1A1 codon 461 and GSTM1 null genotype may be useful in selecting exposed individuals at risk for ethmoid ITAC.

Introduction

Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) of the ethmoid is a rare tumor characterized by high local aggressiveness, predominance among males, and association with occupational exposure in particular to wood and leather dust [1–3]. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma is the most common histotype in all European series of patients treated with anterior craniofacial resection [4–6], whereas it is very rare in American series [7–9]. A widespread use of masks and aspiration devices in American furniture industries may probably explain this difference. The standard treatment of this tumor remains surgery and radiotherapy [10], even if recently complemented by chemotherapy [11].

Given the close correlation between ethmoid ITAC and exposure to wood and leather dust, the relationship between polymorphisms of genes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics and cancer susceptibility is of significant interest because they are thought to predispose the risk of an individual if exposed to a chemical.

Most carcinogens are processed by metabolizing enzymes in two broad steps. The phase I enzymes (CYP450 superfamily) mediate the metabolic “activation” of environmental carcinogens that is required for their interactions with DNA and their genotoxic effect. The phase II enzymes (glutathione S-transferase, or GST family) are responsible for biotransforming and detoxifying carcinogens. Competition and interplay between phase I and II metabolic pathways modulate the levels of DNA adducts, and so the genetic variability in metabolic activities related to these enzymes may influence the risk of cancer development.

Two polymorphisms of the CYP1A1 gene, belonging to CYP450 superfamily, have been related to cancer susceptibility: a C → A transition leading to a substitution of threonine for asparagine at codon 461 (Thr461Asn) [12] and an A → G transition leading to a substitution of isoleucine for valine at codon 462 (Ile462Val) [13]. Moreover, GST gene polymorphisms consisting of a structural deletion that confers a null genotype have been associated with a higher risk of cancer [14,15].

A number of groups have investigated the possible association between the polymorphic variants of metabolizing enzymes such as CYP1A1 and GSTM1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), sometimes with conflicting results. One study of a Japanese patient cohort found that patients with specific polymorphisms in these genes have a genetically higher risk of tumor development [16], whereas no such association was observed in a German population [17]. Considering other tumor types and the smoking habit, it has been reported that the CYP1A1 Ile462Val variant is associated with a three-fold increased risk of lung carcinoma in Japan [18], although this was not confirmed by a similar study in Finland [19]. It has also been reported that CYP1A1-GSTM1 polymorphisms are associated with a grater risk of colorectal cancer [20].

The aim of this case-control study was to investigate ethmoid ITACs for polymorphisms of the CYP1A1 and GSTM1 metabolizing enzymes. We found (and reported for the first time to the best of our knowledge) that CYP1A1 codon 461 polymorphism is overrepresented in ITAC patients in comparison with controls, and often associated with the GSTM1 null genotype, thus suggesting that these polymorphisms may be associated with a high degree of susceptibility to this type of tumor.

Materials and Methods

Study Group

The patients' cohort consisted of a total of 30 patients with histologically documented ITAC of ethmoid, surgically resected at the Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, between 1988 and 2007.

All patients were male and presented a disease onset mean age of 60 years (range, 41–78 years). Nineteen patients were occupationally exposed to wood dust, and 10 to leather dust; the one remaining showed a nonspecific exposure (Table 1).

Table 1.

Gender, Age, Histotype, and Professional Exposure of the Patients Involved in the Study.

N Age/Gender Histotype Professional Exposure
T1 58/M PTCC II Leather dust
T2 56/M PTCC II Wood dust
T3 75/M PTCC II Wood dust
T4 67/M PTCC II Wood dust
T5 63/M AGE Leather dust
T10 50/M PTCC II Wood dust
T11 55/M AGE Leather dust
T12 51/M PTCC II Wood dust
T13 43/M PTCC II Wood dust
T14 78/M PTCC II + AGE Leather dust
T16 63/M PTCC II Wood dust
T17 49/M PTCC II Leather dust
T18 63/M PTCC II Wood dust
T19 64/M SRC Aspecific
T21 77/M PTCC II Wood dust
T22 41/M PTCC II Wood dust
T23 64/M PTCC II Wood dust
T24 63/M PTCC II Leather dust
T26 68/M AGE Wood dust
T27 67/M PTCC II Wood dust
T28 58/M PTCC II Wood dust
T29 69/M AGE Leather dust
T30 63/M PTCC II Wood dust
T31 68/M PTCC II Leather dust
T32 64/M PTCC II Wood dust
T33 50/M PTCC II Wood dust
T34 72/M AGE Leather dust
T35 60/M PTCC II Leather dust
T36 51/M PTCC II Wood dust
T37 43/M PTCC II Wood dust

AGE indicates alveolar-globet cell; M, male; PTCC, papillary-tubular cylinder cell; SRC, signetring cell.

The first 15 cases were previously investigated for alterations in the TP53, p14ARF, p16INKα, and HRAS genes [21] and for deregulation of the APC-βcatenin and KRAS-BRAF pathways, along with loss of heterozygosity at 18q [22]. In this study, we applied the same case numeration as that used in our previous studies.

The control group consisted of 79 consecutive blood donors with no history of cancer (a patient/control ratio of approximately 1:2) who were firstly surveyed by means of a questionnaire to determine their suitability to be blood donor and to obtain information about demographic factors. This control group including 79 men (mean age, 53 years; range, 31–70 years) was homogeneous in terms of race (whites) and residence (Italy) without any documented exposure history.

DNA Extraction

For the first 15 patients, the analyses were made using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, whereas fixed and/or whole blood samples were available for the remaining patients.

DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sections and peripheral blood following the instructions of DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA).

CYP1A1 Analysis

The Thr461Asn and Ile462Val polymorphisms were detected by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primer sequences 5′-AACGGTTTCTCACCCCTGAT-3′ and 5′-GGTCATGTCCACCTTCACG-3′. The PCR was carried out with 100 ng of genomic DNA in 25 µl of a mixture containing 25 mM MgCl2, 2.5 µl of 1x PCR Buffer (Bionova, Cambridge, United Kingdom), 0.4 µM of each primer, 0.2 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, and 2.5 U of Taq Gold (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). After initial denaturation at 95°C for 8 minutes, amplification was performed for 35 cycles at 95°C (30 seconds), 59°C (30 seconds), 72°C (1 minute), followed by final elongation at 72°C (7 minutes). The PCR products were resolved by means of agarose gel electrophoresis, and DNA fragments were sequenced using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM, 3100, Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

GSTM1 Analysis

The null genotype assay was carried out by a comparative duplex PCR. The primers used to amplify a 230-bp fragment of GSTM1 gene were 5′-GAACTCCCTGAAAAGCTAAAGC-3′ and 5′-GTTGGGCTCAAATATACGGTGG-3′ [23].

β-Globin gene was amplified in the same reaction as an internal positive control with primers 5′-ACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC-3′ and 5′-GCAAGACTTCTCCTCAGGAG-3′. Amplification was performed for 35 cycles under the following conditions: 30-second denaturation at 97.5°C, 1-minute primer annealing at 50°C, and 30-second primer extension at 72°C.

Statistical Analysis

The CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms were described by reporting the absolute frequencies and corresponding percentages of CYP1A1 codon 461 and 462 and GSTM1 genotypes in ITAC patients and controls as a whole or in subgroups defined by age (≤60 years or >60 years). CYP1A1 codon 461 was also analyzed according to the GSTM1 genotype because it was possible to anticipate an interaction between them.

The observed and expected genotype frequencies in the controls were compared using the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium theory. The differences in the frequencies of genotypes and the individual alleles between cases and controls, as well as between the subgroups, were assessed using Fisher's exact tests. Exact odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence limits (CL) were also calculated as a measure of association, with ORs of 1 denoting the absence of association and those more than or less than 1 indicating an overrepresented or underrepresented genotype, respectively, in the cases compared with controls. The possible interaction between CYP1A1 codon 461 and GSTM1 genotypes was checked using the Breslow-Day test. All P values reported are two-sided, and the threshold used for statistical significance was 5%.

Results

CYP1A1 Polymorphisms: Thr461Asn and Ile462Val

Firstly, the analyses were performed on 15 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ITAC samples (T1–T21) of which blood samples were not available. Subsequently, we analyzed both fixed tumor and the corresponding blood samples available in four new patients (T22–T26). The genotypes Thr/Thr and Thr/Asn at codon 461 of CYP1A1 were found in three and one fixed ITACs, as well as in the corresponding blood samples. Thus, we exclusively analyzed the blood samples of 11 additional new ITAC patients (T27–T37).

The distribution of CYP1A1 codon 461 and 462 polymorphisms in ethmoid ITAC cases and controls is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Distribution of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 Polymorphisms among ITAC Patients and Control Subjects, OR Estimates with 95% CL, and Fisher's Exact P Values for Testing the Difference in Genotype Distribution between Cases and Controls.

Genotype Cases Controls OR (95% CL)* P
N % N %
Overall series: 30 cases
CYP1A1 Thr461Asn
Thr/Thr 23 76.7 73 92.4 1.00
Thr/Asn 7 23.3 6 7.6 3.70 (1.13, 12.1) 0.0422
Asn/Asn 0 - 0 - -
CYP1A1 Ile462Val
Ile/Ile 29 96.7 70 92.1 1.00
Ile/Val 1 3.3 5 6.6 0.48 (0.01, 4.62) 0.7644
Val/Val 0 - 1 1.3 -
GSTM1
Positive 11 45.8 34 44.7 1.00 1.000
Null 13 54.2 42 55.3 0.96 (0.35, 2.69)
*

The reference distribution for ORs computation is that of controls.

The frequencies of the Thr/Thr, Thr/Asn, and Asn/Asn genotypes at codon 461 in the control group were 92.4%, 7.6%, and 0%, respectively, in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (exact P = 1.00); the corresponding frequencies in the ITAC one were of 76.7%, 23.3%, and 0%, respectively. The overall difference between cases and controls for CYP1A1 polymorphism at codon 461 was statistically significant (P = .0422) and corresponded to a more frequent Asn allele (from 3.8% in controls to 11.7% in the cases). The Thr/Asn genotype was significantly overrepresented among the cases (OR = 3.70; 95% CL, 1.13, 12.1; Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CYP1A1 polymorphism analysis. The assay was carried out by DNA amplification through PCR and automatic sequencing. The CYP1A1 nucleotide sequence analysis shows a C → A transition at codon 461 leading to the Thr/Asn genotype in a ITAC sample. The genotype Ile/Ile was present at codon 462.

The frequencies of Ile/Ile, Ile/Val, and Val/Val genotypes at codon 462 among the controls were 92.1%, 6.6%, and 1.3%, respectively, again in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (exact P = .13), whereas the corresponding figures among the cases were 96.7%, 3.3%, and 0%, respectively. The genotype distribution was not significantly different between cases and controls (P = .76).

GSTM1 Null Genotype Assay

The analysis was performed in 24 ethmoid ITAC cases owing to an unsuccessful PCR amplification of the other six specimens.

Thirteen ethmoid ITAC patients (54%) carried the GSTM1 null genotype and 11 (46%) revealed the GSTM1-positive genotype (Table 2 and Figure 2). In the control group, 42 (55.3%) of 76 people showed a GSTM1 null genotype and 34 (44.7%) carried a GSTM1-positive genotype (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

GSTM1 null genotype analysis. The assay was carried out by a comparative duplex PCR. The GSTM gene (lower band) was coamplified with a β-globin fragment gene (upper band). A visible specific GSTM PCR product in lane 3 indicates the retention of GSTM, whereas the absence of the PCR product in lanes 1 and 2 indicates the GSTM null genotype. The presence of the housekeeping β-globin PCR product in all lanes indicates a good DNA integrity. M indicates marker (1-kb ladder).

The GSTM1 null genotype was not significantly different between cases and control (P = 1).

CYP1A1 Codon 461 and GSTM1 Interaction

The distribution of CYP1A1 codon 461 polymorphism in the cases and controls in relation to GSTM1 genotype is shown in the Table 3.

Table 3.

Distribution of CYP1A1 Codon 461 Polymorphism among ITAC Patients and Control Subjects, OR Estimates with 95% CL, and Fisher's Exact P Values for Testing the Difference in Genotype Distribution between Cases and Controls.

GSTM1 Genotype: 24 Cases Cases Controls OR (95% CL)* P
N % N %
Positive: 11 cases
CYP1A1 Thr461Asn
Thr/Thr 10 90.9 29 85.3 1.00 1.000
Thr/Asn 1 9.1 5 14.7 0.58 (0.01, 6.24)
Null: 13 cases
CYP1A1 Thr461Asn
Thr/Thr 8 61.5 41 97.6 1.00
Thr/Asn 5 38.5 1 2.4 25.6 (2.23, >50.0) 0.0019

Figures are shown according to the GSTM1 genotype.

*

The reference distribution for ORs computation is that of controls.

P = .0107 for the interaction.

Among the subjects with GSTM1-positive genotype, the distribution of codon 461 polymorphism was similar between cases and controls, whereas the number of people carrying both CYP1A1 codon 461 polymorphism and GSTM1 null genotype was significantly higher among the ethmoid ITAC patients than controls (P = .0019, OR = 25.6).

The test for interaction between CYP1A1 codon 461 and GSTM1 polymorphisms was also significant (P = .0107).

Discussion

Ethmoid ITACs are uncommon tumors associated with occupational exposure to wood and other industrial dusts. In a previous study of TP53, p16INKa, and p14ARF deregulation in a series of ITAC, we observed a high occurrence of gene alterations, in particular, a high rate of p16INKa and p14ARF methylation and TP53 mutations consisting of a G:C → A:T transition [21], which is a type of mutation that is typically related to carcinogen exposure [24].

Starting from these findings suggesting a causal relationship between the presence of genotoxic agents and gene alterations, we decided to compare the genotypes of the metabolizing enzymes CYP1A1 and GSTM1 in these patients with those found in a group of healthy donors to verify whether it is possible to identify subjects with tumor risk.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the association between CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms has been evaluated in ITAC.

The results showed that Thr/Asn genotype at CYP1A1 codon 461 was significantly overrepresented among these patients, suggesting that Thr/Asn genotype could lead to greater susceptibility to ethmoid ITAC. On the contrary, no significant difference was found in the distribution of the CYP1A1 codon 462 and GSTM1 null genotype between cases and controls. Little is known about the biological significance of CYP1A1 codon 461 polymorphism, but, on the basis of the current preclinical evidence [25–27], it is possible that the 461 variant may lead to greater catalytic activity, thus favoring an accumulation of activated carcinogens, which, coupled with a less-efficient detoxification by GSTM1, could increase the risk of ethmoid ITAC.

We therefore assessed the relative risks for the combinations of the CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotypes and observed that a combined codon 461 Thr/Asn and GSTM1 null genotype segregated among ethmoid ITAC patients with an odds ratio of 25.6. This value was higher than that observed for the CYP1A1 Thr/Asn polymorphism alone (OR = 3.70). Similar results have been reported by Sato et al. [16], whose study revealed an higher occurrence of oral SCC in patients with both polymorphisms, although the CYP1A1 gene polymorphism was at codon 462 instead of codon 461. These findings indicate that the loss of metabolic balance between the activation of carcinogens by the Thr/Asn genotype of CYP1A1 and their detoxification by GSTM1 is synergistic, perhaps involving CYP1A1 different codons depending on the tumor type.

Polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genes have also been described in colorectal cancer [20], a tumor with histopathological resemblance to ITAC despite a different etiology. Interestingly, we have previously reported genetic alterations in ethmoid ITAC patients that are similar to those observed in colorectal cancer, including TP53, APC, and KRAS mutations and loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 18q [21,22]. In this context, our findings of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms in ethmoid ITAC provide further evidence that the morphologic similarities between ITAC and CRC mirror resemblance at a genetic level. However, recent results showed in ITAC absence of microsatellite instability, occurring in 10% to 15% of colorectal cancer [28], and a pattern of gains and losses only partially similar to colorectal cancer [29].

No information of genotype distribution is expected from age because of the small number of patients and from gender because of the preponderance of males among subjects with ITAC of ethmoid due to occupational exposure.

In conclusion, starting from the overrepresentation of the deregulation of the two metabolizing enzymes here investigated in ethmoid ITAC patients, we can assume that individuals with CYP1A1 codon 461 polymorphism are genetically at high risk of developing ITAC of ethmoid and that the risk increases in the presence of combined genotyping of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genes. Nevertheless, to draw definitive conclusions, these preliminary results need to be confirmed in a larger number of ITAC cases and extended to a control group represented by a cohort of professionally exposed individuals who did not develop the disease. If these future analyses will confirm the role of these two polymorphisms in the ITAC susceptibility, CYP1A1 codon 461 and GSTM1 null genotype characterization may be useful in selecting and monitoring individuals at risk for developing ethmoid ITAC due to occupational exposure to carcinogens. Furthermore, as different populations with other tumor types, such as HNSCC and lung carcinoma [15–17], show variations in the distribution of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms, it is necessary to verify whether such epidemiological and geographical differences can also be observed in ethmoid ITAC patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Gianni Roncato for photographic assistance. All authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata 2004) and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro.

References

  • 1.Donhuijsen K, Hattenberger S, Schroeder HG. Nasal sinus carcinoma after wood dust exposure. Morphological spectrum of 100 cases. Pathologe. 2004;25:14–20. doi: 10.1007/s00292-003-0668-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Acheson ED. Nasal cancer in the furniture and boot and shoe manufacturing industries. Prev Med. 1976;5:295–315. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(76)90046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luce D, Leclerc A, Morcet JF, Casal-Lareo A, Gérin M, Brugère J, Haguenoer JM, Goldberg M. Occupational risk factors for sinonasal cancer: a case-control study in France. Am J Ind Med. 1992;21:163–175. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700210206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cantu G, Solero CL, Mariani L, Salvatori P, Mattavelli F, Pizzi N, Riggio E. Anterior craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors—a series of 91 patients. Head Neck. 1999;21:185–191. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199905)21:3<185::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lund VJ, Howard DJ, Wei WI, Cheesman AD. Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses—a 17-year experience. Head Neck. 1998;20:97–105. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199803)20:2<97::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roux FX, Pages JC, Nataf F, Devaux B, Laccourreye O, Menard M, Brasnu D. Malignant ethmoid-sphenoidal tumors. 130 cases. Retrospective study. Neurochirurgie. 1997;43:100–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McCutcheon IE, Blacklock JB, Weber RS, DeMonte F, Moser RP, Byers M, Goepfert H. Anterior trancranial (craniofacial) resection of tumors of the paranasal sinuses: surgical technique and results. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:471–480. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Richtsmeier WJ, Briggs RJ, Koch WM, Eisele DW, Loury MC, Price JC, Mattox DE, Carson BS. Complications and early outcome of anterior craniofacial resection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:913–917. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880090029010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shah JP, Kraus DH, Bilsky MH, Gutin PH, Harrison LH, Strong EW. Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:1312–1317. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900120062010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choussy O, Ferron C, Védrine PO, Toussaint B, Liétin B, Marandas P, Babin E, De Raucourt D, Reyt E, Cosmidis A, et al. Adenocarcinoma of ethmoid: a GETTEC retrospective multicenter study of 418 cases. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:437–443. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815b48e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Licitra L, Suardi S, Bossi P, Locati LD, Mariani L, Quattrone P, Lo Vullo S, Oggionni M, Olmi P, Cantù G, et al. Prediction of TP53 status for primary cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin chemotherapy in ethmoid sinus intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4901–4906. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cascorbi I, Brockmoller J, Roots I. A C4887A polymorphism in exon 7 of human CYP1A1: population frequency, mutation linkages, and impact on lung cancer susceptibility. Cancer Res. 1996;56:965–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hayashi SI, Watanabe J, Nakachi K, Kawajiri K. PCR detection of an A/G polymorphism within exon 7 of the CYP1A1 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:4797. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.17.4797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katoh T, Nagata N, Kuroda Y, Itoh H, Kawahara A, Kuroki N, Ookuma R, Bell DA. Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 (GSTT1) genetic polymorphism and susceptibility to gastric and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:1855–1859. doi: 10.1093/carcin/17.9.1855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lafuente A, Pujol F, Carretero P, Villa JP, Cuchi A. Human glutathione S-transferase mu (GST mu) deficiency as a marker for the susceptibility to bladder and larynx cancer among smokers. Cancer Lett. 1993;68:49–54. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(93)90218-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sato M, Sato T, Izumo T, Amagasa T. Genetically high susceptibility to oral squamous cell carcinoma in terms of combined genotyping of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genes. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:267–271. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matthias C, Bockmuhl U, Jahnke V, Jones PW, Hayes JD, Alldersea J, Gilford J, Bailey L, Bath J, Worrall SF, et al. Polymorphism in cytochrome P450 CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2E1 and glutathione S-transferase, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers: studies in upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8:91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kiyohara C, Wakai K, Mikami H, Sido K, Ando M, Ohno Y. Risk modification by CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms in the association of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a case-control study in Japanese nonsmoking women. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:139–144. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hirvonen A, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, Karjalainen A, Anttila S, Vainio H. Point-mutational MspI and Ile-Val polymorphisms closely linked in the CYP1A1 gene: lack of association with susceptibility to lung cancer in a Finnish study population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1992;1:485–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Slattery ML, Samowitz W, Ma K, Murtaugh M, Sweeney C, Levin TR, Neuhausen S. CYP1A1, cigarette smoking, and colon and rectal cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:842–852. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Perrone F, Oggionni M, Birindelli S, Suardi S, Tabano S, Romano R, Moiraghi ML, Bimbi G, Quattrone P, Cantu G, et al. TP53, p14ARF, p16INK4a and H-ras gene molecular analysis in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:196–203. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frattini M, Perrone F, Suardi S, Balestra D, Caramuta S, Colombo F, Licitra L, Cantù G, Pierotti MA, Pilotti S. Phenotype-genotype correlation: challenge of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Head Neck. 2006;28:909–915. doi: 10.1002/hed.20433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gronau S, Koenig-Greger D, Jerg M, Riechelmann H. GSTM1 enzyme concentration and enzyme activity in correlation to the genotype of detoxification enzymes in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Dis. 2003;9:62–67. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.02866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4855–4878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwarz D, Kisselev P, Cascorbi I, Schunck WH, Roots I. Differential metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol by human CYP1A1 variants. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:453–459. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.3.453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singh V, Rastogi N, Sinha A, Kumar A, Mathur N, Singh MP. A study on the association of cytochrome-P450 1A1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in north Indian women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:73–81. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9264-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kisselev P, Schunck WH, Roots I, Schwarz D. Association of CYP1A1 polymorphisms with differential metabolic activation of 17beta-estradiol and estrone. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2972–2978. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martínez JG, Pérez-Escuredo J, López F, Suárez C, Alvarez-Marcos C, Llorente JL, Hermsen MA. Microsatellite instability analysis of sinonasal carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hermsen MA, Llorente JL, Pérez-Escuredo J, López F, Ylstra B, Alvarez-Marcos C, Suárez C. Genome-wide analysis of genetic changes in intestinaltype sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Head Neck. 2009;31:290–297. doi: 10.1002/hed.20973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Translational Oncology are provided here courtesy of Neoplasia Press

RESOURCES