Skip to main content
Chemistry Central Journal logoLink to Chemistry Central Journal
. 2009 Mar 19;3:6. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-3-6

Heavy metal ions in wines: meta-analysis of target hazard quotients reveal health risks

Declan P Naughton 1,✉, Andrea Petróczi 1
PMCID: PMC2672085

Abstract

Correction to Naughton DP, Petroczi A: Heavy metal ions in wines: meta-analysis of target hazard quotients reveals health risks. Chem Central J 2008, 2:22.

Correction

During preparation of a subsequent paper, we observed a computational error in the Target Hazard Quotients (THQ) listed in this work which have been inadvertently overestimated [1]. The overall results and conclusion of our paper with the corrected figures have remained valid. Corrections for Figures Four, Five and Six are given below in tabular form. The correct values with EFr = 365 days, EDtot-male = 63.9 years and EDtot-female = 66.7 years; BWmale = 83.11 kg, BWfemale = 69.81 kg, AT = 6 years and 30 years (non-carcinogenic) are shown in Tables 1 and 2 (For Fig Four); and Tables 3 and 4 (for Figs Five and Six). Although in keeping with the literature, THQ values were calculated for AT = 30 years, given the effect metals are assumed to have on health and delayed onset, AT is likely to be below 30 years. As noted in the paper, the THQ values calculated are concerning in that they are mainly above the safe level of THQ ≤ 1, which premise holds for many cases with the adjusted THQ values. It must be emphasized that the THQ value is to be judged as either below or above 1, where any value above 1 is a cause for health concern. It is notable that i) choices in value input into averaging time (AT), ii) uncertainty factor regarding the oral reference dose (RfD) and iii) bioavailability can have significant effect on the THQ value. The THQ is designed to be a conservative estimate. However, further research is required in order to provide guidance on appropriate value choices.

Table 1.

corrected combined THQ values for countries (AT = 6 years)

Country SUM Male
min
SUM Male max SUM Female min SUM Female max
Argentinean 0.021624 0.038379 0.026872 0.047693

Australian 0.080282 0.359869 0.099765 0.447204

Austrian 2.243322 5.447014 2.787739 6.768916

Brazilian 0.000192 0.001068 0.000239 0.001327

Czech 0.705472 2.476704 0.876679 3.077760

French 2.114068 8.136375 2.627117 10.11094

German 0.483296 5.512977 0.600584 6.850887

Greek 0.192215 3.015917 0.238863 3.747830

Hungarian 0.535830 14.63428 0.647560 17.45348

Italian 0.000491 0.000726 0.000610 0.000902

Jordanian 0.040045 2.405039 0.049763 2.988702

Macedonian 0 1.441614 0 1.791470

Portuguese 3.524521 5.126613 4.379865 6.370758

Serbian 0.221963 1.438181 0.275829 1.787204

Slovakian 0.000128 12.81552 0.000159 15.92563

Spanish 0.864379 5.742503 1.074150 7.136116

Table 2.

corrected combined THQ values for countries (AT = 30 years)

Country SUM Male
min
SUM Male max SUM Female min SUM Female max
Argentinean 0.004325 0.007676 0.005374 0.009539

Australian 0.016056 0.071974 0.019953 0.089441

Austrian 0.448664 1.089403 0.557548 1.353783

Brazilian 0.000038 0.000214 0.000048 0.000265

Czech 0.141094 0.495341 0.175336 0.615552

French 0.422814 1.627275 0.525423 2.022188

German 0.096659 1.102595 0.120117 1.370177

Greek 0.038443 0.603183 0.047773 0.749566

Hungarian 0.107166 2.926856 0.129512 3.490697

Italian 0.000098 0.000145 0.000122 0.000180

Jordanian 0.008009 0.481008 0.009953 0.597740

Macedonian 0.000000 0.288323 0.000000 0.358294

Portuguese 0.704904 1.025323 0.875973 1.274152

Serbian 0.044393 0.287636 0.055166 0.357441

Slovakian 0.000026 2.563103 0.000032 3.185127

Spanish 0.172876 1.148501 0.214830 1.427223

Table 3.

Corrected mean THQ values for individual metals comparing red and white wines (AT = 6 years)

Portuguese Red Portuguese White Czech
Red
Czech
White
V (male) 0.775268 1.890116 2.082331 2.386671

V (female) 0.963413 2.348816 2.587678 2.965878

Mn (male) 0.201139 0.237065 0.230353 0.179058

Mn (female) 0.249953 0.294597 0.286256 0.222512

Ni (male) 0.029153 0.039244 0.061402 0.043649

Ni (female) 0.036227 0.048768 0.076303 0.054242

Zn (male) 0.068557 0.070586 0.078310 0.046986

Zn (female) 0.085194 0.087716 0.097314 0.058389

Cu (male) 0.189812 0.039244 0.140157 0.122137

Cu (female) 0.235877 0.048768 0.174171 0.151777

Cr (male) 0.000562 0.000699

Cr (female) 0.000518 0.000644

Pb (male) 0.000410 0.000308 0.000342 0.000667

Pb (female) 0.000510 0.000383 0.000425 0.000829

Table 4.

Corrected mean THQ values for individual metals comparing red and white wines (AT = 30 years)

Portuguese Red Portuguese White Czech
Red
Czech
White
V (male) 0.155054 0.378023 0.416466 0.477334

V (female) 0.192683 0.469763 0.517536 0.593176

Mn (male) 0.040228 0.047413 0.046071 0.035812

Mn (female) 0.049991 0.058919 0.057251 0.044502

Ni (male) 0.005831 0.007849 0.012280 0.008730

Ni (female) 0.007245 0.009754 0.015261 0.010848

Zn (male) 0.013711 0.014117 0.015662 0.009397

Zn (female) 0.017039 0.017543 0.019463 0.011678

Cu (male) 0.037962 0.007849 0.028031 0.024427

Cu (female) 0.047175 0.009754 0.034834 0.030355

Cr (male) 0.000112 0.000104

Cr (female) 0.000140 0.000129

Pb (male) 0.000082 0.000062 0.000068 0.000133

Pb (female) 0.000102 0.000077 0.000085 0.000166

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Declan P Naughton, Email: D.Naughton@kingston.ac.uk.

Andrea Petróczi, Email: A.Petroczi@kingston.ac.uk.

References

  1. Naughton DP, Petroczi A. Heavy metal ions in wines: meta-analysis of target hazard quotients reveals health risks. Chem Central J. 2008;2:22. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-2-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chemistry Central Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES