Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1989 Jan;27(1):49–52. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.1.49-52.1989

Ofloxacin susceptibility testing quality control parameters for microdilution and disk diffusion, and confirmation of disk diffusion interpretive criteria.

P C Fuchs 1, R N Jones 1, A L Barry 1, T L Gavan 1
PMCID: PMC267230  PMID: 2492304

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 221 clinical isolates to ofloxacin were tested simultaneously by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods with commercially prepared 5-micrograms ofloxacin disks. The acceptability of the following previously proposed zone diameter breakpoints was confirmed: greater than or equal to 16 mm, susceptible; 13 to 15 mm, intermediate; less than or equal to 12 mm, resistant. On the basis of a multilaboratory collaborative study, the following are proposed as acceptable ofloxacin MIC ranges for quality control organisms: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, 0.03 to 0.06 micrograms/ml; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, 0.12 to 0.5 micrograms/ml; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, 1.0 to 4.0 micrograms/ml. Ofloxacin quality control zone diameter ranges for the disk diffusion test are tentatively proposed, but variations in the performance of different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar may prove to be a serious problem for users.

Full text

PDF
49

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blaser J., Dudley M. N., Gilbert D., Zinner S. H. Influence of medium and method on the in vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria to ciprofloxacin and enoxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):927–929. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.5.927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuchs P. C., Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C. Proposed disk diffusion susceptibility criteria for ofloxacin. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):310–311. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.310-311.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lockley M. R., Wise R., Dent J. The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Dec;14(6):647–652. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.6.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lode H., Höffken G., Olschewski P., Sievers B., Kirch A., Borner K., Koeppe P. Pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin after parenteral and oral administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1338–1342. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mandell W., Neu H. C. Disk susceptibility of ofloxacin, a new carboxyquinolone. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):786–788. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.786-788.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sato K., Matsuura Y., Inoue M., Une T., Osada Y., Ogawa H., Mitsuhashi S. In vitro and in vivo activity of DL-8280, a new oxazine derivative. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):548–553. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.4.548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Seibert G., Limbert M., Klesel N. Comparison of the antibacterial in vitro and in vivo activity of ofloxacin (HOE 280 DL 8280) and nalidixic acid analogues. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;2(6):548–553. doi: 10.1007/BF02016563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wolfson J. S., Hooper D. C. The fluoroquinolones: structures, mechanisms of action and resistance, and spectra of activity in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):581–586. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.4.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES