Abstract
Childhood exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is a serious threat to public health and can be influenced by parental lifestyle habits and beliefs. Taking the above into account we aimed at locating predictors of parental induced exposure to SHS in the house and family car among 614 children who visited the emergency department of two large pediatric hospitals in Athens, Greece. The multivariate analysis revealed that the factors found to mediate household exposure to paternal SHS were the number of cigarettes smoked per day (O.R 1.13, p<0.001) while, having a non-smoking spouse had a protective effect (O.R 0.44, p=0.026). Maternally induced household SHS exposure was related to cigarette consumption. For both parents, child exposure to SHS in the family car was related to higher numbers of cigarettes smoked (p<0.001), and for fathers was also more often found in larger families. Additionally, lower educated fathers were more likely to have a spouse that exposes their children to SHS inside the family car (O.R 1.38 95%C.I: 1.04–1.84, p=0.026). Conclusively, efforts must be made to educate parents on the effects of home and household car exposure to SHS, where smoke free legislation may be difficult to apply.
Keywords: Passive smoking, environmental exposure, preschool children, smoking, determinants, parents, Greece, home exposure, behavior
1. Introduction
Children’s exposure to second hand smoke (SHS) is a serious threat to public health and is a potent mixture of carcinogens, volatile toxins and chemicals [1,2]. It has been estimated that at least 1,000 million adults are smokers worldwide and that at least 700 million children breathe air polluted by tobacco smoke at home [3].
Exposure to cigarette smoke during childhood is related to the ever increasing frequency of childhood diseases such as respiratory illness, asthma, otitis media, and sudden infant death syndrome [4,5] and may lead to a predisposition towards vascular dysfunction and cancer [6,7] a fact that comes to stress the ever growing necessity for smoke-free households and cars.
Children’s exposure to SHS is usually involuntary, arising from smoking mainly by adults, in the places where children live and play, with an emphasis on SHS exposure in the home or the household car. [8,9] In places and households where people smoke, infants are not only directly exposed to SHS toxins through its direct inhalation, but also through other pathways of exposure including the inhalation and ingestion of contaminated dust and skin contact with both smokers and contaminated household surfaces [10]
The investigation into the specific parental characteristics that are related to childhood SHS exposure is of interest, as it seems that these characteristics differ between different social groups and between different nationalities with the majority of findings focused towards maternal smoking habits [11,12]. Previous research has indicated that predictors of SHS exposure during childhood are factors such as the parent’s social class and educational level, the season of the year (winter has higher levels of SHS exposure), the household dimensions, the day of sample collection, the number of children in the family as also the child’s gender, while medically at risk children are among the most venerable populations towards SHS exposure [9–17].
Taking the above into account, the purpose of this study was to investigate into the possible predictors of childhood SHS exposure due to parental smoking, and to investigate into the relationships between the parents’ characteristics and their children’s exposure to cigarette smoke inside the house or family car among a pediatric population in Greece.
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Design-Study Population
The study population was comprised of 662 children, younger than 12 years of age (342 males and 320 females, with a mean age 4.8 ± 2.5 years) that visited the Emergency Departments of the two Pediatric Hospitals of Athens “Aghia Sophia” and “Aglaia Kyriakou” between September and December, 2004. These two pediatric hospitals cover almost the entire child population within the area of Attica, (which includes the city of Athens), while many children from other parts of Greece are often hospitalised in these institutions as the Greek health care system allows patients to obtain health care from any public hospital of their choice.
Data was collected from the children’s mothers through personal interviews, with the use of a structured questionnaire that investigated into parental demographic, social and educational characteristics in relationship to smoking in the house or family car.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Bioethics board of the “Agia Sofia” hospital (192525/02), while written consent was obtained from the mothers prior to completing the questionnaire. No mother refused to participate (response rate of 100%) however; some mothers did not answer some of the questions. Exposure to household SHS was defined as “as least one of the parents smokes in front of their child ≥1 cigarette per day”.
2.2. Sample Size Estimation
The adequate number of people for investigating into the relationship between the independent variables with the frequency of exposure to SHS was estimated. For each test with a p-value of 0.05 and statistical power (1-β) of 0.80, and according to our estimations at least 47 people were needed. Subsequently, for testing the 13 associations included in the questionnaire, at least 611 people were estimated to be needed. The week that the limit of 611 persons was exceeded, collection of data stopped therefore finalizing the total number of participants at 662.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was performed with the use of the statistical package SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). In order to explore the relationship between parental characteristics and child exposure to cigarette smoke, two-sided tests were performed. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, while qualitative variables are depicted with the use of frequencies. Initially, a univariate analysis was performed so as to investigate into whether one or more of the parents’ and children’s characteristics were related to the existence of parental induced SHS exposure. In addition to the above univariate model a backward stepwise logistic regression model was applied so as to investigate into the main determinants of childhood exposure to parental SHS in the house or family car. Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were also derived. Relationships with a p-value (p) ≤0.05 were considered as statistically significant. The variables entered during step 1 of the stepwise backward logistic regression analysis model include: the child’s gender, child’s age, number of children in the family, the father’s educational status (low<12 years education vs. high >12 years education), the mother’s educational status (low<12 years education vs. high >12 years education), the father’s and mother’s number of cigarettes per day, whether friends or relatives are allowed to smoke in the house, the belief that they do not want their child to become a smoker and the spouse’s smoking status (modified in each case according to whether maternal or paternal characteristics were investigated into).
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive and Demographic Characteristics
The study population’s descriptive characteristics are depicted in Table 1 below. Children of pre-school age (4–6 years old) comprised the largest age group (47%), followed by toddlers of 1–3 years (31.7%). Sixty six percent of the fathers and 50% of the mothers were smokers with an average consumption of 16.3 and 9.3 cigarettes per day. The parental smoking habits were similar in regards to only the type of tobacco consumed as almost all participants consumed cigarettes (except two men, who smoked cigars), while when investigating into the percentage of households that were exposed to parental smoke (mother or father a smoker) 69.2% of households had at least one parent that smokes in front of their child, exposing it to SHS, while in 19.6% of the households both parents’ reported smoking in front of their children.
Table 1.
Descriptive characteristics of the study population.
| Variable | Data |
|---|---|
| Children’s’ gender % (n) | |
| Boy | 51.7 (342) |
| Girl | 48.3 (320) |
| Children’s’ age category % (n) | |
| 0–3 | 31.7 (210) |
| 4–6 | 47.1 (312) |
| 7+ | 21.1 (140) |
| Smokers % (n)* | |
| Father | 66.3 (439) |
| Mother | 50.0 (331) |
| Number of cigarettes smoked/day Mean ± SD* | |
| Father | 16.3 ±12.8 |
| Mother | 9.32 ± 9.9 |
| Parent smokes inside the house around children % (n/N) * | |
| Father | 85.4 (375/439) |
| Mother | 57.1 (189/331) |
| Parentally induced SHS exposure in the household % (n) | |
| No parents | 30.8 (204) |
| One parent | 49.5 (328) |
| Both parents | 19.6 (130) |
| Parent smokes inside the car when children are inside % (n/N) * | |
| Father | 56.5 (248/439) |
| Mother | 10.3 (34/331) |
n/N: positive answers/total answers, SD= standard deviation;
Smoking participants only
In addition to the above, the mean age was 4.8 years for both males and females (p=0.813). Fathers on average were older (36.4 vs. 32.1 years) and had a higher level of education than mothers with 71.9% percent of the fathers having a higher university education, in comparison to 58.2% of the mothers.
3.2. Factors Related to Parental Induced SHS Exposure in the Car and House
To investigate into the parental characteristics which were associated with reports of household SHS exposure (None vs. reported household exposure to parental SHS), initially a univariate analysis was performed. Specifically the fathers’ level of education, parental smoking habits, the mothers’ age and the number of smokers in the house were found to be significantly related (p<0.05) to household exposure to parental SHS as seen in Table 2.
Table 2.
Characteristics associated to the self reported SHS exposure in the home in the univariate analysis.
| Variable | Non-exposed | SHS-exposed | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Childs age*mean±SD | 5.0 ±2.9 | 4.7 ± 2.3 | 0.066 |
| Fathers age* | 37.2±6.5 | 36.1±6.7 | 0.050 |
| Mothers age* | 32.9±5.8 | 31.7±5.9 | 0.023 |
| Number of smokers in the house* | 0.6±0.6 | 1.5±0.5 | <0.001 |
| Number of children* | 1.8±0.7 | 1.9±0.7 | 0.314 |
| Paternal cigarettes per day* | 6.1±10.2 | 20.9±11.2 | <0.001 |
| Maternal cigarettes per day* | 4.3±7.6 | 11.6±10.0 | <0.001 |
| Childs gender** | |||
| Male | 34.2 (117) | 65.8 (225) | 0.05 |
| Female | 27.2 (87) | 72.8 (233) | |
| Housing** | |||
| Apartment building | 29.3 (127) | 70.7 (307) | 0.372 |
| Free standing house | 32.9 (74) | 67.1 (151) | |
| Maternal education** | |||
| Lower | 31.8 (87) | 68.2 (187) | 0.733 |
| Higher | 30.4 (116) | 69.6 (265) | |
| Paternal education** | |||
| Lower | 41.6 (77) | 58.4 (108) | <0.001 |
| Higher | 26.4 (125) | 73.6 (349) | |
| Friends/relatives smoke at home** | |||
| Yes | 28.8 (115) | 71.2 (284) | 0.164 |
| No | 34.1 (86) | 65.9 (166) | |
| Bothers you if your child becomes a smoker** | |||
| Yes | 32.5 (160) | 67.5 (333) | 0.124 |
| No | 26.0 (44) | 74.0 (125) | |
Student t-test, equal variances assumed, results depicted as mean±standard deviation
Chi-squared test, exact, two sided, presented as % (n)
In addition to the univariate analysis used to investigate into the predictors of household SHS exposure a second univariate analysis was performed to investigate into the characteristics that were related with childhood exposure to SHS in the family car (data not shown). The analysis revealed that the higher the number of cigarettes smoked per day by the father (p<0.001) and the larger number of children in the family were significantly associated to exposure to paternal related smoking in the car (p=0.019). On the contrary the fathers level of education (p=0.507), the child’s gender (p=0.924), the child’s age (p=0.687), and the fathers age (p=0.714), were not found to be significantly associated with paternal smoking in the car. Similar findings were also found when investigating into the relationship between maternal characteristics and maternal smoking in the family car, with only the number of cigarettes smoked per day found to be associated with parental SHS in the family car, while the mothers age (p=0.227) and level of education (p=0.575) as also the child’s gender (p=0.469) and age (p=0.471), were not related to maternal self reported smoking in the car.
3.3. Paternal Characteristics Found to Mediate Childhood SHS Exposure in the House and Family Car
The multivariate logistic regression analysis provided a clearer insight into the actual characteristics that influence paternal induced childhood exposure to SHS in the house and family car. According to the performed backward stepwise multivariate analysis, (Table 3), household SHS exposure due to paternal smoking was associated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day the father (p<0.001), the child’s age (younger children were more likely to be exposed to paternal smoke) (p=0.026) and if his spouse is a non smoker (O.R 0.44 95%C.I: 0.24–0.80, p=0.007), additionally a trend was noticed for lower educated fathers to be less likely to expose their children to SHS in the house in comparison to their higher educated peers (O.R 0.57 95%C.I: 0.30–1.07, p=0.077).
Table 3.
Adjusted Odds Ratio of the paternal characteristics that were found to be significantly associated with childhood exposure to SHS due to parental smoking*.
| B coefficient | O.R | 95% C.I. | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Paternal smoking in the house in front of the children** | |||||
| Paternal Educational status (Low) | −0.57 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 1.07 | 0.077 |
| Paternal cigarettes per day | 0.12 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 1.19 | <0.001 |
| Spouse smokes (No) | −0.82 | 0.44 | 0.24 | 0.80 | 0.007 |
| Childs age | −0.12 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 0.026 |
| Paternal smoking in the family car with children as passengers** | |||||
| Maternal Educational status (Low) | −0.36 | 0.78 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.078 |
| Paternal cigarettes per day | 0.06 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 1.09 | <0.001 |
| Number of children in the family | 0.33 | 1.38 | 1.04 | 1.84 | 0.026 |
Smoking fathers only (n=439)
A Stepwise backward logistic regression model was applied. Variables entered on step 1: child’s gender, child’s age, number of children, father’s educational status, mother’s educational status, father’s number of cigarettes per day, spouse smoker (no vs. yes), friends or relatives allowed to smoke in the house, belief that they do not want their child to become a smoker.
An additional regression analysis was performed so as to reveal the characteristics that would influence paternal smoking in the family car with children as passengers. Again the number of cigarettes consumed per day by the father affected childhood SHS exposure (p<0.001), as also the number of children in the family (B coefficient = 0.33, p=0.026). Although a trend was noticed for the spouses lower educational status to have a protective effect on paternal smoking habits in the car (controlling for her smoking status), this relationship did not reach the point of statistical significance.
3.4. Maternal Characteristics Found to Mediate Childhood SHS Exposure in the House and Family Car
The characteristics that wee found to influence childhood exposure to SHS due to the mothers smoking habits as seen in Table 4. The only factor that was found to significantly influence maternal smoking inside the house or family car in the presence of her children were the number of cigarettes smoked by the mother per day (p=0.019 and p<0.001 respectively), while a tendency for lower educated mothers to expose their children higher to SHS was also noted although it did not reach the level of statistical significance (O.R 1.51 95%C.I: 0.95–2.40, p=0.083). While the fathers educational status was not associated with maternal smoking habits in the house, a borderline tendency for his educational status to influence maternal smoking in the car was noticed (p=0.054) with mothers who smoke inside the car more likely to have a lower educated spouse (O.R 2.23, 95%C.I: 0.99–5.01, p=0.054).
Table 4.
Adjusted Odds Ratio of the maternal characteristics that were found to be significantly associated with childhood exposure to SHS due to maternal smoking*.
| B coefficient | O.R | 95% C.I. | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
|
Maternal smoking in the house in front of the children** | |||||
| Maternal Educational status (Low) | 0.41 | 1.51 | 0.95 | 2.40 | 0.083 |
| Maternal cigarettes per day | 0.04 | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 0.019 |
|
Maternal smoking in the family car with children as passengers** | |||||
| Paternal Educational status (Low) | 0.80 | 2.23 | 0.99 | 5.01 | 0.054 |
| Maternal cigarettes per day | 0.16 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 1.26 | <0.001 |
Smoking mothers only (n=331)
A Stepwise backward logistic regression model was applied. Variables entered on step 1: child’s gender, child’s age, number of children, father’s educational status, mother’s educational status, father’s number of cigarettes per day, spouse smoker, friends or relatives allowed to smoke in the house, belief that they do not want their child to become a smoker.
4. Discussion
4.1. Main Findings
According to our study’s findings, a high percentage of Greek households and cars were not found to be smoke-free. The noted predictors of household SHS exposure due to maternal or paternal smoking were the number of cigarettes smoked by both the mother and father per day and the child’s age, while the mothers’ educational level was borderline not statistically related to SHS household exposure. As for parentally induced SHS in the family car, again the number of cigarettes smoked per day was found to be a strong predictor of SHS exposure as also the number of children in the family. In addition to the above, the other parent’s educational status seemed to affect the spouses habits in the family car with lower educated husbands found to be more likely to have a spouse that smokes in the family car with their children present.
The percentage of parents that smoke in our study were substantially higher than both the prevalence of smoking at a national level as also the percentage of parents of preschool children that smoke [9,18]. A large population based study spanning the prefecture of Chania, Crete indicated that 63% of households with children of our age group, had at least one parent a smoker [8] (52% of the fathers and 36% of the mothers were active smokers), lower than the 69.2% within our hospital based study population, a factor indicative of the effect household exposure to SHS has on ones health [8]. It is also alarming that in almost 20% of the households both parents reported smoking in front of their children, while almost all of the fathers who smoked were reported to expose their children to SHS.
4.2. Household SHS Exposure
We identified the fact that both maternal and paternal smoking habits have a strong effect on child SHS exposure, with the number of cigarettes smoked by the parent directly associated with exposing their children to SHS. Using quantitative calculations and biomarker assessment, childhood SHS exposure has been positively associated with the number of cigarettes smoked by both parents, separately and in total, with maternal smoking habits found to play a more important role in exposure during early childhood [13]. Paternal smoking in the household was influenced by the child’s age, with younger children less likely to be exposed to SHS, a finding similar to findings from other studies, which indicate that the age of the youngest child in the household is a strong predictor of the presence and uptake of a smoke-free home [19,20]. Although research has indicated that a low educational status has also been related to the regression of smoking bans in the household [19], it is a paradox that we found higher educated fathers to be more likely to smoke in front of their children in comparison to their less educated peers. This regional difference could be attributed to disparities in socioeconomical status, a fact that we could not take into account during the analysis. Although it has been found in Greece that higher educated mothers and those of higher socioeconomical status are more likely to be smokers, to our knowledge this has not been found for Greek males yet [17].
Pizacani et al., had indicated that full household smoking bans, and thus lower SHS exposure, were strongly associated with awareness of the harm of SHS [21]. We found that among mothers that smoke and controlling for their spouses smoking habits, a tendency for less educated mothers were one and a half times more likely to smoke in front of their children in comparison to their higher educated peers, a fact that could be indicative of the lack of knowledge that Greek mothers have on the effect SHS has on their child’s health and development.
Parental smoking in the home, not only influences childhood SHS exposure but can also lead to the social acceptance of smoking by the child. It is documented that parents play an important role as role models and can influence substance use and health beliefs, as parental smoking status has been recognised as a strong predictor of smoking experimentation during childhood [22], Additionally, exposure to their parents’ smoking habits may lead adolescents to develop the perception that smoking is a normative adult behaviour [23], and in correlation with social norms and peer pressure may additionally promote tobacco use and experimentation among youth.
4.3. Family Car SHS Exposure
Air monitoring studies have documented the extremely high levels of SHS exposure one is exposed to, when a passenger in a car smokes [24,25]. Children and infants, due to their higher ventilation rates and smaller body mass, inhale elevated levels of SHS for the same level of exposure, and thus are more vulnerable during the short but intense exposure to SHS, within the family car. Due to the above fact, there are strong ethical and public health arguments for governmental interventions and regulations, despite the ongoing debate on the ethics of making private vehicles mandatory smoke-free [26]. Research has indicated the strength and necessity of implementing smoking bans in cars as the number of cigarettes smoked in the car and the number of cigarettes smoked by the owner are associated with nicotine contamination of the interior, while air nicotine levels in smoker cars with bans were not significantly different from those found in nonsmoker cars [27]. Previous research among German preschool children’s exposure to SHS in their family car has indicated that the family’s large size and higher parental education were factors that reduced childhood SHS exposure [28]. Our findings are not identical but similar as although we too found mothers twice more likely to smoke in the family car if their spouse was of a lower level of education in comparison to women with higher educated husbands. Despite the above noticed trend (without it reaching the level of statistical significance), we on the contrary found that husbands were less likely to smoke in the family car if their spouse was of a lower educational level, a fact that we could not explain. Further research is warranted to investigate into the above paradox.
4.4. Main Strengths and Limitations
We must state that the ideal method of evaluating SHS exposure, using the biomarker cotinine, the main metabolite of nicotine, was not performed during this study and the results are based on self reported household exposure to SHS and thus subject to recall and response bias. Biomarker assessment would have permitted a more in depth quantitative analysis into the factors that predict household SHS exposure, opposed to the current qualitative analysis. The conclusions drawn in this manuscript are based on cross sectional survey data, and are thus limited in ability to attribute cause and effect. During the analysis and due to insubstantial data we were not able to investigate neither into inter-hospital clustering nor into the ages of the participants’ siblings, two factors that we must note as a limitation and should be taken into account when designing studies that investigate into SHS exposure.
Despite the above, the use of the two largest pediatric hospitals in Athens, and the statistically derived sample size allow us to interpret with confidence the results and compare them to those of other qualitative SHS exposure studies. Further research is needed with the use of biomarker assessment so as to investigate into any possible “dose-response” effects and would allow for a more in-depth analysis of the determinants that modify household and family car SHS exposure among children in Greece.
5. Conclusions
Parental smoking habits and the number of children in the family were found to be predictors of parentally induced SHS exposure among Greek children in both the household and family car. As a large percentage of public places in Greece will go smoke free within 2009, efforts must be made to inform and educate Greek families on the effects of household exposure to SHS, where smoke free legislation is difficult to apply. The identification of these parental characteristics provides valuable information for the configuration of both mass media and community based educational and prevention programs, which when applied in coherence with nation wide smoke free legislation, may lead to a noted reduction in childhood SHS exposure [29,30].
Acknowledgments
Part of this research project was supported by a US Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI) award for research on secondhand smoke (CIV). We have no conflict of interest to declare.
Footnotes
Author contributions
VM participated in data collection, interpretation and manuscript preparation and had the main role in the study design. EK and KP participated in data collection, management and manuscript preparation, while CIV perform the necessary statistical analysis and had the main role in data interpretation and manuscript preparation.
References
- 1.WHO Report on tobacco smoke and child health: consultation report. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 2.International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC Monographs Programmme on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Human 200283http://www.iarc.fr (accessed December 3, 2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.WHO 1999Consultation report. World Health Organization Division of Noncommunicable Disease, Tobacco Free Initiative International Consultation on Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) and Child Health WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 1999http://www.who.int/tobacco/research/en/ets_report (accessed December 3, 2008). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chilmonczyk B, Salmun L, Metathlin K, Neveux L, Palomaki G, Knight G, Pulkkinen A, Haddow J. Association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and exacerbation of asthma in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:1659–1665. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306103282303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schoendorf K, Kiely J. Relationship of sudden infant death syndrome to maternal smoking during and after pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1992;90:905–908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kosecik M, Erel O, Sevinc E, Selek S. Increased oxidative stress in children exposed to passive smoking. Int J Cardiol. 2005;100:61–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tang D, Warburton D, Tannenbaum SR, Skipper P, Santella RM, Cereijido GS, Crawford FG, Perera F. Molecular and genetic damage from environmental tobacco smoke in young children. Cancer Epidem. Biomarker. Prev. 1999;8:427–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vardavas CI, Tzatzarakis M, Tsatsakis A, Athanasopoulos D, Balomenaki E, Linardakis M, Kafatos A. Biomarkers of Passive Smoking among Greek Preschool Children. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2006;165:891–896. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0196-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vardavas CI, Athanasopoulos D, Balomenaki E, Linardakis M, Kafatos A. Smoking habits of Greek preschool children’s parents. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Matt G, Bernet J, Hovell M. Measuring Secondhand smoke exposure in Children: an ecological measurement approach. J. Pediat. Psychol. 2008;33:156–175. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Douglas R, Woodward A, Miles H, Bueto S, Morris D. A prospective study of proneness to acute respiratory illness in the first two years of life. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1994;23:818–826. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.4.818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lund KE, Skrondal A, Vertio H, Helgason A. To what extent do parents strive to protect their children from environmental tobacco smoke in the Nordic countries? A population-based study. Tob. Control. 1998;7:56–60. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jarvis MJ, Strachan DP, Feyerabend C. Determinants of passive smoking in children in Edinburgh, Scotland. Amer. J. Public Health. 1992;82:1225–9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.9.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thaqi A, Franke K, Merkel G, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J. Biomarkers of exposure to passive smoking of school children: frequency and determinants. Indoor Air. 2005;15:302–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00361.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cornelius MD, Goldschmidt L, Dempsey DA. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in low-income 6-years-olds: Parent report and urine cotinine measures. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2003;5:333–339. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Emmons KM, Hammond K, Fava JL, Velicer WF, Evans JL, Monroe AD. A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children. Pediatrics. 2001;10:18–24. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income. Prev. Med. 2005;40:756–764. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vardavas CI, Kafatos A. Tobacco policy and smoking prevalence in Greece. Eur. J. Public Health. 2006;17:211–213. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Anderson S, Fong GT. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15:iii, 42–50. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.012492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Crone MR, Reijneveld SA, Burgmeijer RJ, Hirasing RA. Factors that influence passive smoking in infancy: a study among mothers of newborn babies in The Netherlands. Prev. Med. 2001;32:209–217. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pizacani BA, Martin DP, Stark MJ, Koepsell TD, Thompson B, Diehr P. Household smoking bans: which households have them and do they work? Prev. Med. 2003;36:99–107. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Otten R, Engels R, van de Ven M, Bricker J. Parental smoking and adolescent smoking stages: The role of parents’ current and former smoking, and family structure. J. Behav. Med. 2007;30:143–154. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9090-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall; Englewood cliffs, New Jersey, USA: 1986. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vardavas CI, Linardakis M, Kafatos A. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in motor vehicles. Tob. control. 2006;15:415. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.017459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rees VW, Connolly GN. Measuring air quality to protect children from secondhand smoke in cars. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2006;31:363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thompson G, Wilson N.Public attitudes to laws for smoke-free private vehicles: a brief review Tob. control 2008. Doi:10.1136/tc.2008.027672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Matt GE, Quintana PJ, Hovell MF, Chatfield D, Ma DS, Romero R, Uribe A. Residual tobacco smoke pollution in used cars for sale: air, dust, and surfaces. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2008;10:1467–1475. doi: 10.1080/14622200802279898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bolte G, Fromme H.For the GME Study Group. Socioeconomic determinants of children’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure and family’s home smoking policy Eur J Public Health 2008November25 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Akhtar P, Currie D, Currie C, Haw S. Changes in child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (CHETS study) after implementation of smoke free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2007;335:545–549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39311.550197.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zakarian J, Hovell M, Sandweiss R, Hofstetter C, Matt G, Bernet T, Pirkle J, Hammond SK. Behavioural counselling for reducing childrens ETS exposure: Implementation in community clinics. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2004;6:1061–1074. doi: 10.1080/1462220412331324820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]