Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1989 Jan;27(1):118–119. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.1.118-119.1989

Evaluation of BACTEC system for urine culture screening.

D Colombrita 1, G Ravizzola 1, F Pirali 1, M Manni 1, N Manca 1, E Savoldi 1, A Turano 1
PMCID: PMC267245  PMID: 2643615

Abstract

We compared urine culturing performed by the calibrated loop method with a screening system (BACTEC). A total of 852 urine specimens were examined by both the conventional loop method and the BACTEC system. With the loop method, 193 (22.6%) urine samples were positive, whereas with the BACTEC system, 185 (21.7%) were positive (sensitivity, 96.01%). At a breakpoint of 10(4) CFU/ml, eight false-negatives were detected (sensitivity, 87.09%), and at a breakpoint of 10(5) CFU/ml, four false-negatives were observed (sensitivity, 97.6%). The specificity of the BACTEC system was 100%. We propose the BACTEC method as an effective alternative to the other growth-dependent screening tests for bacteriuria.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander M. K., Khan M. S., Dow C. S. Rapid screening for bacteriuria using a particle counter, pulse-height analyser, and computer. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Feb;34(2):194–198. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.2.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bixler-Forell E., Bertram M. A., Bruckner D. A. Clinical evaluation of three rapid methods for the detection of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jul;22(1):62–67. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.62-67.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cady P., Dufour S. W., Lawless P., Nunke B., Kraeger S. J. Impedimetric screening for bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Mar;7(3):273–278. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.3.273-278.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hale D. C., Wright D. N., McKie J. E., Isenberg H. D., Jenkins R. D., Matsen J. M. Rapid screening for bacteriuria by light scatter photometry (Autobac): a collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):147–150. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.147-150.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewis J. F., Alexander J. Microscopy of stained urine smears to determine the need for quantitative culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Oct;4(4):372–374. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.4.372-374.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nicholson D. P., Koepke J. A. The Automicrobic System for urines. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Dec;10(6):823–833. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.823-833.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scherstén B., Dahlqvist A., Fritz H., Köhler L., Westlund L. Screening for bacteriuria with a tet paper for glucose. JAMA. 1968 Apr 15;204(3):205–208. doi: 10.1001/jama.1968.03140160015004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shaw S. T., Jr, Hopp M., St Geme J. W., Jr Quantitative urine culture with calibrated bacteriologic loop: office laboratory technique. Minn Med. 1966 May;49(5):749–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smalley D. L., Dittmann A. N. Use of leukocyte esterase-nitrate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1256–1257. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1256-1257.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallis C., Melnick J. L., Longoria C. J. Colorimetric method for rapid determination of bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Sep;14(3):342–346. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.342-346.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu T. C., Williams E. C., Koo S. Y., MacLowry J. D. Evaluation of three bacteriuria screening methods in a clinical research hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May;21(5):796–799. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.796-799.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES