Abstract
Free radicals are important mediators of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion
injury. Nitrone spin traps have been shown to scavenge free radicals. The
cardioprotective effect of the spin trap, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline
N-oxide (DMPO), was investigated in an isolated heart model of global
ischemia and reperfusion. Rat hearts were perfused and subjected to global
ischemia for 30 min followed by reperfusion with four treatment groups of
varying DMPO concentration (0.5-10 mM) administered before induction of
ischemia. DMPO treatment improved the recovery of left ventricular (LV)
function and coronary flow over the 30-min period of reperfusion compared with
untreated hearts. Enhanced recovery was observed for all doses studied but was
highest with 1 mM treatment with 2.4-fold higher recovery of LV developed
pressure and 37% reduction in infarct size. Superoxide was measured by tissue
fluorometry using the
probe hydroethidine. Hearts treated with 1 mM DMPO showed a significant
reduction in
production
compared with control hearts both over the first 5 min of ischemia and upon
reperfusion after 30 min of global ischemia. Studies of mitochondrial function
demonstrated that 1 mM DMPO increased the recovery of function of complexes I,
II/III, and IV after 30 min of reperfusion. Immunoblotting with antibodies
against complexes I, II, and IV further revealed marked up-regulation of
mitochondrial proteins, suggesting that DMPO prevents their ischemic
degradation via scavenging oxygen radicals generated during
ischemia/reperfusion. Thus, DMPO functions as a protective agent against
ischemic and postischemic injury via radical scavenging, conferring robust
dose-dependent protection with salvage of mitochondrial function and redox
homeostasis.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in a variety of
pathophysiological disorders. ROS generation during early reperfusion is a
major cause of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury
(Zweier, 1988;
Zweier and Talukder, 2006).
The spin trap, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO)
(Fig. 1), has been employed
widely in the detection and identification of various free radicals such as
superoxide (
), hydroxyl
(HO·), and carbon-centered radicals to form persistent spin
adducts that are detectable by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
(Villamena and Zweier, 2004).
The capacity of DMPO to trap radicals suggests its potential use as an
antioxidant. In fact, DMPO and α-phenyl-tert-butyl-nitrone
(PBN) (Fig. 1) have exhibited
pharmacological activity, such as in the treatment of neurodegenerative
disease and acute stroke (Floyd et al.,
1997; Floyd and Hensley,
2000).
Fig. 1.
Chemical structures.
Several groups have evaluated the use of DMPO as a potential
cardioprotective agent against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury
(Tosaki and Braquet, 1990;
Bradamante et al., 1993;
Pietri et al., 1998;
Maurelli et al., 1999). A
reperfusion-associated burst of
generation has been shown
to occur when isolated hearts are subjected to ischemia and reperfusion
(Zweier et al., 1987,
1989). However, the slow
reactivity of DMPO with
and the low efficiency of spin trapping led investigators to use high-spin
trap concentrations from 5 to 40 mM
(Bradamante et al., 1993;
Pietri et al., 1998;
Maurelli et al., 1999).
Administration of DMPO during the preischemic period or during reperfusion was
assumed inconsequential in determining the extent of left ventricular (LV)
functional recovery (Hearse and Tosaki,
1987; Bolli et al.,
1989; Pietri et al.,
1998). Both of these assumptions were predicated on the belief
that the only cardioprotective effect of DMPO is due to its radical scavenging
property during reperfusion.
Conflicting studies have been reported in regards to the mode of DMPO action although spin trapping of free radicals may be the most plausible mechanism for its cardioprotective property against reperfusion injury. Bradamente et al. (1993) showed that DMPO in millimolar concentrations did not show cardioprotection from ischemia-reperfusion injury using Langendorff rat heart preparations, but Pietri et al. (1998) and Tosaki et al. (1990) reported protection. Moreover, 1,2,2,4,5,5-hexamethyl-3-imidazoleine-oxide (HMIO) (Tosaki et al., 1992) or pyrrolidine (PyH) (Pietri et al., 1998) (Fig. 1), which are structurally related compounds but not spin traps, did not exhibit improvement in cardiac function, further confirming the role of the nitrone moiety in cardioprotection.
The mechanism of nitrone antioxidant activity is perplexing because the
reactivity of
to DMPO is
slow at neutral pH; however, at mildly acidic pH, the reactivity is much
faster (Finkelstein et al.,
1980; Allouch et al.,
2007). The high reactivity of
in acidic pH is due to
the protonation of
to
form hydroperoxyl radical
(
)
(pKa for
is 4.8), and
is known to be a
stronger oxidizing agent than
. Furthermore, the
pKa of DMPO was established to be 6.0
(Burgett et al., 2008) and that
protonation of DMPO at mildly acidic pH can considerably increase its
reactivity to
, comparable
with the favorability of addition of
to DMPO. Therefore,
because the production of
is ubiquitous during ischemic events, and because acidosis occurs during
ischemia, it is possible that the rate of
DMPO-
formation can be
enhanced and may exhibit cardioprotective effects during reperfusion
(Simonis et al., 1998;
Xiong et al., 2004).
It was also demonstrated that the
adduct of DMPO decomposes
to yield nitric oxide (NO), and this characteristic could potentially exhibit
therapeutic properties (Locigno et al.,
2005). Moreover, it has been shown that spin trapping of carbonate
radical anion (
) by DMPO
results in the formation of nitrite anions
(Villamena et al., 2007). The
potentially damaging role of
has been gaining some
attention because inorganic anions are ubiquitous in most biological and
environmental systems. Therefore, potentially efficacious cardioprotective
interventions will probably require targeting and inhibiting ROS-related
cascades generated during both ischemia and reperfusion
(Bolli, 2001).
We hypothesize that the free radical scavenging property of DMPO may offer cardioprotection from radical-mediated tissue injuries by salvaging key cellular enzymes that are susceptible to oxidative insult such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain. This study evaluated whether DMPO when administered only immediately before the initiation of global normothermic ischemia can confer myocardial preservation with enhanced postischemic recovery of cardiac function. The dose dependence of this cardiac protection and the mechanisms involved in this process were determined. It was observed that DMPO was highly effective in preventing postischemic myocardial injury with marked preservation of mitochondrial function and electron transport
Materials and Methods
Langendorff Heart Preparation. All procedures were in accordance with the Ohio State University Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing ∼350 g were anesthetized with pentobarbital (∼50 mg/kg i.p.) and heparinized with 0.1 ml of 1000 IU/kg. After hemithoractomy, hearts were rapidly excised, and aorta were cannulated under retrograde coronary perfusion at 80 mm Hg with Krebs-Henseleit buffer (120.0 mM NaCl, 5.9 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 16.7 mM glucose, 25.0 mM NaHCO3, 0.5 mM EDTA, bubbled with 95%/5% O2/CO2). An elastic balloon was inserted into the LV and adjusted to a constant volume, yielding end diastolic pressure (EDP) between 8 and 12 mm Hg over the first 10 min of a preischemic 20-min baseline period. Hearts were immersed in a buffer-filled glass chamber with a water jacket. Temperature was measured every 10 min using a Physitemp thermoprobe to ensure normothermic conditions during baseline, global ischemia, and reperfusion intervals. Perfusate and hearts were maintained at 37°C ± 0.2°C with the water jacket chamber connected to an external circulating heat bath.
Global Ischemia/Reperfusion with LV Function and Coronary Flow Measurement. All hearts were subjected to a 20-min baseline period under constant perfusion pressure. Hearts were randomly assigned to one of five study groups including control and four DMPO treatment groups. Immediately before global ischemia, with the perfusion rate set at ∼2 ml/min, these groups received 4 ml of oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer with varying concentrations of DMPO (0, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mM). After 30 min of global ischemia, hearts were reperfused for an additional 30 min. LV pressures were continuously recorded using Powerlab 4/25 ADC (ADInstruments Ltd., Chalgrove, Oxfordshire, UK) and Chart software. The following derived indices of LV mechanical function were instantaneously recorded: peak systolic pressure, EDP, left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP = peak systolic pressure - EDP), heart rate (HR), and rate pressure product (RPP = LVDP × HR). Coronary flow (CF) was continuously measured using the Transonic Systems TS410 flowmeter (Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY).
ROS Fluorescence of Perfused Rat Hearts. In another series of
experiments, rat hearts were perfused as described above in a separate
perfusion system designed for fluorescent measurements. Data were collected in
control and 1 mM DMPO-treated hearts during a 20-min baseline, 30-min ischemic
interval, and 30-min reperfusion. Light interference was minimized by
enclosing the perfusion system in an internally painted black box. A single
coil containing optical fibers for emission and excitation was carefully
positioned directly on the LV surface of the heart for epifluorescence
measurements. The hydroethidine (HE)/ethidium (ET) fluorescent probe was used
to detect intracellular ROS production in isolated rat hearts. HE (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) is a neutral fluorescent probe specifically sensitive to
, but not to
H2O2. The concentrated HE stock was made in
N,N-dimethylacetamide (Acros Organics, Fairlawn, NJ)
(Zuo et al., 2000;
Zuo and Clanton, 2002), and
for infusion, this was diluted >400-fold in perfusate. The heart was
infused with 4 ml of a 44 μM HE solution for 2 min followed by 5-min
washout. In response to ROS, HE is oxidized, resulting in the formation of ET.
ET is positively charged and has better cellular retention and stability
compared with HE. Thus, ET formation was chosen as an indicator of ROS
production, which is a common method when using this probe
(Nethery et al., 1999;
Zuo et al., 2000;
Zuo and Clanton, 2002). ROS
fluorescence was measured using a tissue fluorometer (C&L Instruments,
Inc., Hershey, PA). The excitation beam from a 150-W xenon lamp was focused on
a 6-mm-diameter fiber optic coil, and the light passed through a filter wheel
containing four specific band-pass filters. A second filter wheel with four
emission filters was used to separate emission light at specific wavelengths.
This light was focused on the photomultiplier tube, and the signal was
imported to a computer equipped with FluorMeasure version 2.7 acquisition
monitor interface via the A/D board (C&L Instruments, Inc.). The ET
excitation filter was set at 515 ± 20 nm, and the ET emission was set
at 590 ± 25 nm.
Assay of Enzymatic Activities of Mitochondrial ETC. At the end of the experiments, the myocardium of the left ventricle of rat hearts were excised and immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen. The tissue was homogenized in ice-cold HEPES buffer (3 mM, pH 7.2) containing sucrose (0.25 M), EGTA (0.5 mM), and protease inhibitor cocktail (1:40; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). The tissue homogenate was centrifuged at 600g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was subjected to analysis of mitochondrial electron transfer activities in situ using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The electron transfer activity (ETA) of complex I [NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (NQR)] was determined by following the rotenone-sensitive ubiquinone-1 (Q1; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) stimulated NADH oxidation (Busch et al., 1996). In brief, an appropriate amount of tissue homogenate was added to an assay mixture (0.5 ml) containing potassium phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 8.0), NaN3 (2 mM), Q1 (0.1 mM), and NADH (0.15 mM). The complex I activity (nanomoles of NADH oxidized per minute per milligram of protein) was determined by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm, confirmed by inhibition with rotenone (20 μM), and calculated using an extinction coefficient of 6.22 mM/cm. The ETA of succinate-cytochrome c reductase (SCR; complex II/III) in the tissue homogenate was assayed by measuring ferricytochrome c (from horse heart; Sigma-Aldrich) reduction (Busch et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2000). In brief, an appropriate amount of tissue homogenate was added to an assay mixture (0.5 ml) containing potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4), EDTA (0.3 mM), KCN (100 μM), succinate (20 mM), and ferricytochrome c (50 μM). The SCR activity (nanomoles of cytochrome c reduced per minute per milligram of protein) was determined by measuring the increase in absorbance at 550 nm, confirmed by inhibition with antimycin A (20 μM; Sigma-Aldrich), and calculated with a millimolar extinction coefficient of 18.5 mM/cm. The ETA of complex IV [cytochrome c oxidase (CcO)] was assayed by measuring ferrocytochrome c oxidation and was further confirmed by inhibition with KCN (Busch et al., 1996; Chen et al., 2000). In brief, an appropriate amount of tissue homogenate was added to an assay mixture (0.5 ml) containing potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) and ferrocytochrome c (60 μM). The CcO activity (nanomoles of ferrocytochrome c oxidized per minute per milligram of protein) was determined by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 550 nm, confirmed by inhibition with KCN (50 μM), and calculated with an extinction coefficient of 18.5 mM/cm (Chen et al., 2000).
Immunoblotting Analysis. Myocardial tissues were minced and homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer (250 W, 10 s for three times) in ice-cold HEPES buffer (3 mM, pH 7.2) containing sucrose (0.25 M), EGTA (0.5 mM), and protease-inhibitor cocktail (1:40). The supernatant of tissue homogenate was collected by centrifugation at 600g for 20 min. The reaction mixture was mixed with the Laemmli sample buffer at a ratio of 4:1 (v/v) in the presence of β-mercaptoethanol, incubated at 70°C for 10 min, and then immediately loaded onto a 4 to 20% Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gradient gel. Samples were run at room temperature for 2 h at 100 V. Protein bands were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 10% methanol. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TTBS) and 5% dry milk (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The blots were then incubated overnight with anti-51-kDa (for complex I) polyclonal antibody or anti-70-kDa (for complex II) polyclonal antibody or anti-CoXI and anti-CoXVb (for complex IV) monoclonal antibodies at 4°C. Blots were then washed three times in TTBS and incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit/mouse IgG in TTBS at room temperature. The blots were again washed twice in TTBS and twice in Tris-buffered saline and then visualized using ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare, Fairfield, CT). Measurements were repeated six times for each assay.
Myocardial Infarct Size Measurement. To delineate the viable and infarcted myocardium, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) was used, which stains viable myocardium red, and areas of infarction appear white, as described previously (Talukder et al., 2008). Hearts were subjected to a 20-min baseline period under constant perfusion pressure and randomly assigned to control or DMPO treatment groups. Immediately before global ischemia, with the perfusion rate set at ∼2 ml/min, these groups received 4 ml of oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer with or without 1 mM DMPO. Hearts were then subjected to 30 min of global ischemia and 120 min of reflow and then immediately removed and prepared for sectioning. After freezing, the hearts were serially sectioned into 2-mm slices using a heart slicer and then incubated in 1% TTC (in phosphate-buffered saline) for 15 min. Staining was stopped by removing sections and placing them overnight in 10% neutrally buffered formaldehyde. Images were taken after 12 h using NIS Elements F 2.20 software and analyzed with MetaMorph software.
Statistical Analysis. All data were reported as group averages ± S.E.M. Statistical analyses of LV function and coronary flow were performed at the end of the baseline period and at the end of 30-min reperfusion using one-way analysis of variance followed by least significant difference multiple-comparison test. Evaluation of infarct size was performed by two-tailed Student's t test. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
DMPO Protects Myocardial Function Recovery. Figure 2 shows the recovery of LVDP throughout the 30-min period of reperfusion after 30 min of global ischemia for each of the four DMPO-treated and control groups. Administering 0.5 to 10 mM DMPO immediately before the onset of global ischemia dose-dependently conferred robust cardioprotection during reperfusion with all doses studied. Compared with controls, impairment of LV function at the end of 30 min of reperfusion with DMPO treatment was greatly decreased in the 1 mM DMPO treatment group, with 43.0 ± 5.0% recovery of LVDP versus 17.6 ± 3.6% in the untreated control group (n = 8, p < 0.01). However this protection decreased as the dose of DMPO increased [43.0 ± 5.0% (1 mM DMPO) versus 31.4 ± 3.6% (10 mM) (n = 6), p < 0.05]. Figure 3 shows that the RPP recovered to 46.2 ± 4.5% of preischemic baseline levels in the 1 mM DMPO group compared with only 13.4 ± 2.1% (n = 8, p < 0.01) in controls. This protection was seen in all DMPO-treated groups; however, the recovery decreases as the doses rise [46.2 ± 4.5% (1 mM DMPO) versus 30.8 ± 4.3% (10 mM, n = 6), p < 0.05]. Figure 4 illustrates that LV EDP was also dramatically and dose-dependently improved in all treated groups compared with controls (p < 0.05). DMPO treatment also enhanced the recovery of coronary flow with significantly higher recovery seen with 1, 5, and 10 mM DMPO treatment (Fig. 5).
Fig. 2.
Time course of recovery of LVDP for various DMPO concentrations. The graphs show the preischemic values after 20 min baseline equilibrium (EQ 20′) and the time course of reperfusion (R) in minutes. Data are presented as percentage of baseline (*, p < 0.05, control versus various DMPO treatments at the end of 30-min reperfusion; †, p < 0.05, 1 mM DMPO versus 10 mM DMPO treatments at the end of 30-min reperfusion). Data are average ± S.E.M. with n = 8 for 0 and 1 mM; n = 4 for 0.5 and 5 mM; n = 6 for 10 mM.
Fig. 3.
Time course of recovery of RPP for various DMPO concentrations. The graphs show the preischemic values after 20-min baseline equilibrium (EQ 20′) and the time course of reperfusion (R) in minutes. Data are presented as described in Fig. 1. *, p < 0.05, control versus various DMPO treatments at the end of 30-min reperfusion; †, p < 0.05, 1 mM DMPO versus 10 mM DMPO treatments at the end of 30-min reperfusion.
Fig. 4.
Time course of recovery of EDP for various DMPO concentrations. Data are presented for the hearts described in Fig. 1 with measured values shown in mm Hg. *, p < 0.05, control versus various DMPO treatments at the end of 30-min reperfusion.
Fig. 5.
Time course of recovery of CF for various DMPO concentrations. A, time course of CF recovery, for the hearts as described in Fig. 1. To more clearly depict the differences in CF recovery without data overlap, the bar graph in B shows the final values for each group. Data are presented as percentage recovery of basal flow. *, p < 0.05, control versus 1 mM DMPO treatment.
DMPO Reduces ROS Formation in the Isolated Heart. As shown in Fig. 6, measurements of ROS with HE/ET in separate groups of control-untreated or 1 mM DMPO-treated hearts revealed that DMPO significantly reduced the increase of ROS observed in untreated control hearts during global ischemia and after reperfusion (n = 6, p < 0.05). This supports the efficacy of DMPO in scavenging oxygen radicals during ischemia and reperfusion.
Fig. 6.
Plots of peak ET fluorescence within 5 min during the onset of ischemia and reperfusion of untreated (controls) versus treated hearts (1 mM DMPO) relative to baseline. Control (I), onset of global ischemia; DMPO (I), onset of global ischemia with 1 mM DMPO treatment; control (R), onset of reperfusion; DMPO (R), onset of reperfusion with 1 mM DMPO pretreatment (**, p < 0.05 versus 1 mM DMPO treatment). Data are mean ± S.E.M. with n = 6.
DMPO Decreases Infarct Size. Measurements of myocardial infarction were performed in untreated and DMPO-treated hearts subjected to 30 min of global ischemia followed by 120 min of reperfusion. TTC staining revealed that hearts treated with 1 mM DMPO had a reduced infarct size compared to control, with infarct sizes of 14.4 ± 2.6 and 23.0 ± 3.0%, respectively (p = 0.05) (Fig. 7). Thus, with 1 mM DMPO treatment, decreased myocardial infarction is seen accompanying the improved recovery of LV function.
Fig. 7.
Comparison of infarct size in DMPO and untreated hearts. Infarct size as percentage LV was measured by TTC staining after 2 h of global ischemia. Data are mean ± S.E.M. with n = 6. *, p = 0.05 versus control.
DMPO Increases the Recovery of Mitochondrial Function. Figure 8 shows the enzymatic activities of mitochondrial electron transport chain, including complex I (NQR), SCR (a supercomplex of complexes II and III), and complex IV (CcO) that were assayed in the tissue homogenate of postischemic hearts. In postischemic hearts without pretreatment of DMPO, myocardial NQR, SCR, and CcO activities were significantly decreased to 26.9 ± 6.6, 57.9 ± 10.7, and 50.9 ± 8.6% of those detected in the baseline control, respectively (n = 6, p < 0.01), indicating oxidative impairment of mitochondrial electron transport chain during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Nevertheless, in DMPO-treated hearts, all the enzymatic activities of myocardial NQR, SCR, and CcO activity were significantly protected and close to the baseline level at the end of reperfusion (n = 6, p < 0.01). These results show that the impairment of the mitochondrial function is markedly diminished during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion by pretreatment with 1 mM DMPO, thus confirming the protective efficacy of DMPO.
Fig. 8.
The enzymatic activity of mitochondrial electron transport chain in the tissue homogenates of postischemic rat hearts (n = 6). A, NQR activity. B, SCR activity. C, CcO activity. *. p < 0.05 versus reperfusion (R) + 1 mM DMPO.
DMPO Prevents Ischemic Degradation and Increases the Levels of Mitochondrial Proteins. Tissue homogenates of postischemic hearts were further probed with a polyclonal antibody against 51-kDa FMN-binding protein (nuclear DNA encoded) of complex I, a polyclonal antibody against 70-kDa FAD-binding protein (nuclear DNA encoded) of complex II, and monoclonal antibodies against subunit I (CoXI, mitochondrial DNA encoded) and subunit Vb (CoXVb, nuclear DNA encoded) of complex IV. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as a loading control for Western blotting. As indicated in Fig. 9, protein expression of mitochondrial electron transport chain was generally down-regulated in the postischemic heart. In the presence of DMPO, protein expression in the postischemic heart was significantly up-regulated by ∼150% for NQR (Fig. 9A, p < 0.05, n = 6), by ∼96% for complex II (Fig. 9B, p < 0.01, n = 6), and by ∼400% for CcO (CoXI, Fig. 9C, p < 0.01, n = 6). These results implicate that DMPO improved the recovery of mitochondrial function through inhibiting ischemic degradation and inducing marked up-regulation of the electron transport chain proteins.
Fig. 9.
Effect of DMPO treatment on the protein expression of mitochondrial electron transport chain in the postischemic heart. Tissue homogenates of untreated and 1 mM DMPO-treated postischemic hearts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then immunoblotted with antibodies against mitochondrial electron transport complex (A-D). The antibodies used are: anti-51 kDa (FMN-binding subunit) polyclonal antibody for complex I, anti-70 kDa (FAD-binding subunit) polyclonal antibody for complex II, and anti-CoX I and anti-CoX Vb monoclonal antibodies for complex IV. The signals were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as indicated. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. of six independent experiments. **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05 versus postischemic heart without DMPO treatment.
Discussion
This work has demonstrated that cardioprotection of LV contractile function
by the spin trap, DMPO, occurs in a dose-dependent manner
(Table 1). Enhanced recovery
was observed for all doses studied but was highest with 1 mM treatment, with
2.4-fold higher recovery of LV developed pressure and 3.4-fold higher recovery
of rate pressure product after 30 min of reperfusion with 37% reduction in
infarct size after 2 h of reperfusion. DMPO also preserved mitochondrial
enzyme activities during reperfusion when administered as a single bolus
immediately before the onset of global ischemia in the rat Langendorff model.
The underlying mechanism for this pharmacologic action of DMPO is still
unclear. The protocol in this study employed introduction of a single short
bolus of DMPO as opposed to DMPO loading over the whole period of baseline
equilibration. This single loading of DMPO solution would result in its
further dilution because of its diffusion to the extravascular compartments.
In a previous study, with 5 mM DMPO treatment, Maurelli et al.
(1999) reported a large
increase in ATP for 20-min reperfusion-treated hearts. A single study using a
working heart model reperfused hearts for 10 min in the Langendorff mode with
100 μM DMPO (no preischemic loading of DMPO) reported a significant
increase in developed pressure over that observed in controls after 30-min
ischemia and 30-min reperfusion (Tosaki et
al., 1990). It is interesting that DMPO concentrations used in
prior studies did not yield any therapeutic efficacy over the range from 5 to
40 mM (Bradamante et al., 1993;
Maurelli et al., 1999),
whereas the only reported cardioprotective effect in the perfused rat heart
was observed at a reperfusion-only concentration of 100 μM
(Tosaki et al., 1990). Because
the DMPO reactivity with
is significantly enhanced at mildly acidic pH as demonstrated in the work of
Allouch et al. (2007) and
Burgett et al. (2008), it may
exhibit a more robust protection during ischemia. In the current report, DMPO
reduced the magnitude of increase in EDP at all doses tested. This suggests
that a part of DMPO related therapeutic potential may be due to the prevention
of intracellular calcium overload. It has been shown that the reperfusion
associated burst of oxygen radical generation leads to myocyte calcium loading
with impaired function of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase
(Zweier and Talukder, 2006).
The observation that treatment with 1 mM DMPO prevented the increase of ROS
observed in controls indirectly supports this hypothesis. Other factors
contributing to this protection include potential inhibition of calcium entry
through sarcolemmal L-type Ca2+ channels reducing cytosolic calcium
overload and adduct formation with protonated
inhibiting deleterious
downstream free radical cascades and regulating ROS related signal
transduction (Anderson et al.,
1993; Konorev et al.,
1993).
TABLE 1.
Hemodynamic and coronary flow data
|
DMPO Concentrations
|
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 mM
|
0.5 mM
|
1 mM
|
5 mM
|
10 mM
|
||||||
| Basal | End Reflow | Basal | End Reflow | Basal | End Reflow | Basal | End Reflow | Basal | End Reflow | |
| LV systolic pressure (mm Hg) | 171.5 ± 11.0 | 141.1 ± 8.4 | 142.5 ± 12.5 | 136.3 ± 2.5 | 162.1 ± 6.5 | 145.0 ± 4.3 | 159.2 ± 18.0 | 142.8 ± 1.8 | 156.3 ± 6.9 | 132.8 ± 5.0 |
| LV EDP (mm Hg) | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 117.8 ± 6.1 | 8.7 ± 2.1 | 92.8 ± 8.3 | 8.9 ± 0.7 | 79.1 ± 4.8 | 9.3 ± 1.2 | 84.5 ± 7.3 | 8.8 ± 0.9 | 87.7 ± 3.2 |
| LVDP (mm Hg) | 162.1 ± 11.1 | 23.3 ± 5.2 | 133.8 ± 14.4 | 43.5 ± 6.0 | 153.2 ± 6.4 | 65.9 ± 7.8 | 150.0 ± 18.8 | 58.3 ± 6.3 | 147.6 ± 7.5 | 45.2 ± 5.7 |
| HR (beats/min) | 269.3 ± 6.4 | 255.3 ± 37.7 | 297.8 ± 5.5 | 314.0 ± 13.5 | 290.6 ± 6.9 | 316.0 ± 6.7 | 297.3 ± 12.2 | 294.0 ± 23.4 | 290.0 ± 9.4 | 280.0 ± 13.0 |
| RPP (103 mm Hg/min) | 43.6 ± 2.6 | 50.5 ± 0.8 | 40.0 ± 4.9 | 13.7 ± 2.1 | 44.8 ± 2.8 | 20.6 ± 2.1 | 44.1 ± 4.6 | 17.2 ± 2.4 | 42.6 ± 1.8 | 12.9 ± 1.9 |
| CF (ml/min) | 17.1 ± 0.9 | 9.3 ± 0.9 | 18.0 ± 2.4 | 11.8 ± 3.3 | 15.6 ± 0.7 | 11.0 ± 1.1 | 16.3 ± 0.8 | 11.4 ± 1.2 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | 12.9 ± 2.0 |
Data are mean ± S.E.M.
The unimolecular decomposition of
DMPO-
adduct involves
subsequent release of NO via a ring opening mechanism
(Locigno et al., 2005). We
have shown recently that impairment of endothelial function during myocardial
ischemia results from eNOS uncoupling via oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin
(Dumitrescu et al., 2007).
Depletion of tetrahydrobiopterin by
can then decrease NO
bioavailability and, through the formation of
DMPO-
and its subsequent
decomposition to form NO, can play a significant role in restoring endothelial
function. Although NO is regarded as a potent vasodilator through activation
of cGMP, which then can increase the respiratory substrate to mitochondria
exerting other beneficial effects, NO at relatively high levels can cause
cellular injury by reacting with
to form the highly
oxidizing species, peroxynitrite. The peroxynitrite species is formed in the
postischemic heart and has been shown to induce necrosis and apoptosis and to
inhibit mitochondrial respiration (Wang
and Zweier, 1996). Thus, if DMPO is metabolized to form NO, higher
concentrations could exert adverse effects and toxicity. This could be one
reason for our observations that at the 1 mM level, DMPO provided the maximal
protection in recovery of both LVDP and RPP throughout the reperfusion period,
whereas with 10 mM treatment, less protection was seen.
It has been reported that DMPO can exert direct blockage effects on Ca2+ channels with induction of relaxation in preconstricted smooth muscles (Anderson et al., 1993; Konorev et al., 1993). Therefore, the decrease in therapeutic efficacy observed in the hearts treated with 10 mM DMPO also could be due to toxic interactions with L-type calcium channels. This may be one of the reasons why at higher doses, DMPO partially loses its cardioprotective efficacy.
The higher reactivity of DMPO to
at mildly acidic pH makes
this mechanism an attractive rationale for the antioxidant activity of DMPO
during ischemia (Burgett et al.,
2008). DMPO may provide a protective signaling role via partial
prevention of the deleterious ROS-mediated signaling cascade during ischemia
while retaining beneficial signaling activation. Our study has shown that 1 mM
DMPO significantly decreased ROS production during both ischemia and
reperfusion. There has been much evidence that ROS contribute to many
pathological processes associated with cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury
(Zweier and Talukder, 2006).
The mitochondrial electron transport chain (METC) (complexes I and III in
particular) is an important source of ROS production during ischemia and
pathological conditions of postischemic injury
(Zweier et al., 1987;
Ambrosio et al., 1993;
Paradies et al., 2001).
Previous studies also have shown that under cardiac ischemia/reperfusion, ROS
have been a major cause of mitochondria dysfunction via inactivation of the
METC complexes (Paradies et al.,
2001; Chen et al.,
2007). Similar studies on Langendorff-perfused rat hearts showed
that perfusion for 3 to 10 min with anoxic buffer before the onset of 1-h
global ischemia results in significant protection of complex I against
ischemia-reperfusion-induced damage
(Veitch et al., 1992). In
vitro studies, however, showed that inhibition of complex 1 promotes radical
formation and subsequently can inactivate Krebs cycle enzymes such as
α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase and aconitase
(Sadek et al., 2002).
Mitochondrial respiration also has been shown to modulate eNOS activity, in
which increased NO metabolites were observed under hyperoxic and
sheared-stress conditions (Jones et al.,
2008). Antioxidants targeting mitochondria such as MitoQ decreased
heart dysfunction and mitochondrial damage from ischemia-reperfusion-induced
injury (Adlam et al., 2005).
Therefore, DMPO presumably can scavenge the oxygen free radicals overproduced
by the mitochondrial electron transport chain during ischemia/reperfusion,
exerting a protective effect on mitochondrial function
(Fig. 8). In the presence of
DMPO, the decreased levels of ROS along with the preservation of METC
complexes activity imply that ROS play a major role in the initiation of
oxidative stress during ischemia/reperfusion. The role of
in initiation of
mitochondrial dysfunction also has been further demonstrated by electron
paramagnetic resonance spin-trapping studies using
5-diethoxylphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide using isolated
complex II/III and superoxide dismutase (Chen et al.,
2006,
2007).
Immunoblotting analysis of myocardial tissue homogenates with antibodies
(anti-51 kDa) against the FMN-binding subunit of complex I, antibodies
(anti-70 kDa) against the FAD-binding subunit of complex II, and antibodies
(anti-CoXI and anti-CoXVb) against the subunits I and Vb of complex IV,
indicates that marked up-regulation of mitochondrial protein expression occurs
in the postischemic heart pretreated with DMPO
(Fig. 9, A-D). Subunit I of
complex IV is encoded by the mitochondrial DNA, and others are encoded by the
nuclear DNA. Therefore, pretreatment of DMPO synchronized up-regulation of
mitochondrial proteins encoded by both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. It is
likely that DMPO may exert cardioprotection, in part through either inhibiting
ischemic degradation or increasing biosynthesis of METC proteins that are
required for bioenergetic function. This may occur through the scavenging of
oxygen free radicals by DMPO, and this oxygen radical scavenging could enhance
NO levels. NO has been reported to trigger mitochondrial biogenesis and METC
biosynthesis (McLeod et al.,
2005). eNOS-derived NO has been shown to contribute to
mitochondrial biogenesis under the physiological conditions of thermogenesis
(Nisoli et al., 2003). Thus,
NO salvaged either by the DMPO-induced scavenging of
or alternatively
decomposed from DMPO itself under ischemic conditions directly or indirectly
exerts cardioprotection through increasing mitochondrial biogenesis.
Furthermore, immunoblotting analysis with the antibodies (anti-CoXVb) against
complex IV also revealed that the precursor of complex IV subunit Vb in the
cytosol modestly accumulated in the postischemic heart (data not shown).
However, subunit Vb accumulation in the cytosol was decreased in the
postischemic heart pretreated with DMPO, leading to up-regulation of matured
subunit Vb in the mitochondria (Fig.
9D). This result implicates that DMPO may also exert
cardioprotection through enhancing the efficiency of protein transport from
cytosol to mitochondria and increasing the accuracy of mitochondrial protein
processing and assembly in mitochondria, which in turn preserves mitochondrial
function in the postischemic heart.
The nitrone spin trap DMPO exerted strong cardioprotective effects when administered in low millimolar concentrations immediately before the onset of ischemia with marked enhancement in the recovery of cardiac contractile function and decreased infarct size. It was shown to decrease ROS levels upon reperfusion and greatly enhance the preservation and recovery of the function of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Future studies will be needed to further characterize the precise molecular mechanisms of how DMPO exhibits myocardial and mitochondrial protection. The development and use of nitrone spin traps targeted for specific cellular compartments may enhance their efficacy and minimize toxicity. Recently, it has been shown that a broad range of drugs including nitrones can be conjugated to a mitochondria-targeted lipophilic triphenylphosphonium cation (Hardy et al., 2007). Such intracellularly targeted nitrones derived from or similar to DMPO may offer even more robust pharmacological protection at lower drug levels.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Brian Palmer for valuable input on the early stages of the project and Dr. Hassan Talukder for helpful comments and support.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [Grants HL63744, HL65608, HL38324, HL81248, HL83237].
J.L.Z. and F.A.V. contributed equally to this work.
doi:10.1124/jpet.108.143479.
ABBREVIATIONS: ROS, reactive oxygen species; DMPO, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide; LV, left ventricular; NO, nitric oxide; EDP, end diastolic pressure; LVDP, left ventricular developed pressure; HR, heart rate; RPP, rate pressure product; CF, coronary flow; HE, hydroethidine; ET, ethidium; ETA, electron transfer activity; NQR, NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase; SCR, succinate-cytochrome c reductase; CcO, cytochrome c oxidase; TTBS, Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20; TTC, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride; eNOS, endothelial nitric-oxide synthase; METC, mitochondrial electron transport chain.
References
- Adlam VJ, Harrison JC, Porteous CM, James AM, Smith RA, Murphy MP, and Sammut IA (2005) Targeting an antioxidant to mitochondria decreases cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J 19 1088-1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allouch A, Lauricella RP, and Tuccio BN (2007) Effect of pH on superoxide/hydroperoxyl radical trapping by nitrones: an EPR/kinetic study. Mol Phys 105 2017-2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ambrosio G, Zweier JL, Duilio C, Kuppusamy P, Santoro G, Elia PP, Tritto I, Cirillo P, Condorelli M, Chiariello M, et al. (1993) Evidence that mitochondrial respiration is a source of potentially toxic oxygen free radicals in intact rabbit hearts subjected to ischemia and reflow. J Biol Chem 268 18532-18541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson DE, Yuan XJ, Tseng CM, Rubin LJ, Rosen GM, and Tod ML (1993) Nitrone spin-traps block calcium channels and induce pulmonary artery relaxation independent of free radicals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 193 878-885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolli R (2001) Cardioprotective function of inducible nitric oxide synthase and role of nitric oxide in myocardial ischemia and preconditioning: an overview of a decade of research. J Mol Cell Cardiol 33 1897-1918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolli R, Jeroudi MO, Patel BS, Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, Lai EK, and McCay PB (1989) Marked reduction of free radical generation and contractile dysfunction by antioxidant therapy begun at the time of reperfusion. Evidence that myocardial “stunning” is a manifestation of reperfusion injury. Circ Res 65 607-622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradamante S, Jotti A, Paracchini L, Monti E, and Morti E [corrected to Monti E] (1993) The hydrophilic spin trap, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide, does not protect the rat heart from reperfusion injury. Eur J Pharmacol 234 113-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgett RA, Bao X, and Villamena FA (2008) Superoxide radical anion adduct of 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO). 3. Effect of mildly acidic pH on the thermodynamics and kinetics of adduct formation. J Phys Chem A 112 2447-2455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Busch AE, Schuster A, Waldegger S, Wagner CA, Zempel G, Broer S, Biber J, Murer H, and Lang F (1996) Expression of a renal type I sodium/phosphate transporter (NaPi-1) induces a conductance in Xenopus oocytes permeable for organic and inorganic anions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93 5347-5351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen YR, Chen CL, Pfeiffer DR, and Zweier JL (2007) Mitochondrial complex II in the post-ischemic heart: oxidative injury and the role of protein S-glutathionylation. J Biol Chem 282 32640-32654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen YR, Chen CL, Yeh A, Liu X, and Zweier JL (2006) Direct and indirect roles of cytochrome b in the mediation of superoxide generation and NO catabolism by mitochondrial succinate-cytochrome c reductase. J Biol Chem 281 13159-13168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen YR, Deterding LJ, Tomer KB, and Mason RP (2000) Nature of the inhibition of horseradish peroxidase and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase by cyanyl radical. Biochemistry 39 4415-4422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dumitrescu C, Biondi R, Xia Y, Cardounel AJ, Druhan LJ, Ambrosio G, and Zweier JL (2007) Myocardial ischemia results in tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) oxidation with impaired endothelial function ameliorated by BH4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 15081-15086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finkelstein E, Rosen GM, and Rauckman EJ (1980) Spin Trapping: kinetics of the reaction of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals with nitrones. J Am Chem Soc 102 4994-4999. [Google Scholar]
- Floyd RA and Hensley K (2000) Nitrone inhibition of age-associated oxidative damage. Ann N Y Acad Sci 899 222-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Floyd RA, Liu RJ, and Wong PK (1997) Nitrone radical traps as protectors of oxidative damage in the central nervous system, in Handbook of Synthetic Antioxidants (Packer L and Cadenas E eds) pp 339-350, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
- Hardy M, Rockenbauer A, Vásquez-Vivar J, Felix C, Lopez M, Srinivasan S, Avadhani N, Tordo P, and Kalyanaraman B (2007) Detection, characterization, and decay kinetics of ROS and thiyl adducts of Mito-DEPMPO spin trap. Chem Res Toxicol 20 1053-1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hearse DJ and Tosaki A (1987) Reperfusion-induced arrhythmias and free radicals: studies in the rat heart with DMPO. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 9 641-650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones CI 3rd, Han Z, Presley T, Varadharaj S, Zweier JL, Ilangovan G, and Alevriadou BR (2008) Endothelial cell respiration is affected by the oxygen tension during shear exposure: role of mitochondrial peroxynitrite. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295 C180-C191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konorev EA, Baker JE, Joseph J, and Kalyanaraman B (1993) Vasodilatory and toxic effects of spin traps on aerobic cardiac function. Free Radic Biol Med 14 127-137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Locigno EJ, Zweier JL, and Villamena FA (2005) Nitric oxide release from the unimolecular decomposition of the superoxide radical anion adduct of cyclic nitrones in aqueous medium. Org Biomol Chem 3 3220-3227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maurelli E, Culcasi M, Delmas-Beauvieux MC, Miollan M, Gallis JL, Tron T, and Pietri S (1999) New perspectives on the cardioprotective phosphonate effect of the spin trap 5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide: an hemodynamic and 31P NMR study in rat hearts. Free Radic Biol Med 27 34-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLeod CJ, Pagel I, and Sack MN (2005) The mitochondrial biogenesis regulatory program in cardiac adaptation to ischemia-a putative target for therapeutic intervention. Trends Cardiovasc Med 15 118-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nethery D, Stofan D, Callahan L, DiMarco A, and Supinski G (1999) Formation of reactive oxygen species by the contracting diaphragm is PLA2 dependent. J Appl Physiol 87 792-800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nisoli E, Clementi E, Paolucci C, Cozzi V, Tonello C, Sciorati C, Bracale R, Valerio A, Francolini M, Moncada S, et al. (2003) Mitochondrial biogenesis in mammals: the role of endogenous nitric oxide. Science 299 896-899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paradies G, Petrosillo G, Pistolese M, and Ruggiero FM (2001) Reactive oxygen species generated by the mitochondrial respiratory chain affect the complex III activity via cardiolipin peroxidation in beef-heart submitochondrial particles. Mitochondrion 1 151-159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pietri S, Liebgott T, Fréjaville C, Tordo P, and Culcasi M (1998) Nitrone spin traps and their pyrrolidine analogs in myocardial reperfusion injury: hemodynamic and ESR implications-evidence for a cardioprotective phosphonate effect for 5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide in rat hearts. Eur J Biochem 254 256-265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sadek HA, Humphries KM, Szweda PA, and Szweda LI (2002) Selective inactivation of redox-sensitive mitochondrial enzymes during cardiac reperfusion. Arch Biochem Biophys 406 222-228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simonis G, Marquetant R, Röthele J, and Strasser RH (1998) The cardiac adrenergic system in ischaemia: differential role of acidosis and energy depletion. Cardiovasc Res 38 646-654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talukder MA, Kalyanasundaram A, Zuo L, Velayutham M, Nishijima Y, Periasamy M, and Zweier JL (2008) Is reduced SERCA2a expression detrimental or beneficial to postischemic cardiac function and injury? Evidence from heterozygous SERCA2a knockout mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294 H1426-H1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tosaki A, Blasig IE, Pali T, and Ebert B (1990) Heart protection and radical trapping by DMPO during reperfusion in isolated working rat hearts. Free Radic Biol Med 8 363-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tosaki A and Braquet P (1990) DMPO and reperfusion injury: arrhythmia, heart function, electron spin resonance, and nuclear magnetic resonance studies in isolated working guinea pig hearts. Am Heart J 120 819-830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tosaki A, Haseloff RF, Hellegouarch A, Schoenheit K, Martin VV, Das DK, and Blasig IE (1992) Does the antiarrhythmic effect of DMPO originate from its oxygen radical trapping property or the structure of the molecule itself? Basic Res Cardiol 87 536-547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veitch K, Hombroeckx A, Caucheteux D, Pouleur H, and Hue L (1992) Global ischemia induces a biphasic response of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Anoxic preperfusion protects against ischemic damage. Biochem J 281 709-715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villamena FA, Locigno EJ, Rockenbauer A, Hadad CM, and Zweier JL (2007) Theoretical and experimental studies of the spin trapping of inorganic radicals by 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO). 2. Carbonate radical anion. J Phys Chem A 111 384-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villamena FA and Zweier JL (2004) Detection of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by EPR spin trapping. Antioxid Redox Signal 6 619-629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P and Zweier JL (1996) Measurement of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite generation in the postischemic heart: evidence for peroxynitrite-mediated reperfusion injury. J Biol Chem 271 29223-29230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong ZG, Zhu XM, Chu XP, Minami M, Hey J, Wei WL, MacDonald JF, Wemmie JA, Price MP, Welsh MJ, et al. (2004) Neuroprotection in ischemia: blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels. Cell 118 687-698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuo L, Christofi FL, Wright VP, Liu CY, Merola AJ, Berliner LJ, and Clanton TL (2000) Intra- and extracellular measurement of reactive oxygen species produced during heat stress in diaphragm muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279 C1058-C1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuo L and Clanton TL (2002) Detection of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in tissues using redox-sensitive fluorescent probes. Methods Enzymol 352 307-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zweier JL (1988) Measurement of superoxide derived free radicals in the reperfused heart: evidence for a free radical mechanism of reperfusion injury. J Biol Chem 263 1353-1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zweier JL, Flaherty JT, and Weisfeldt ML (1987) Direct measurement of free radical generation following reperfusion of ischemic myocardium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84 1404-1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zweier JL, Kuppusamy P, Williams R, Rayburn BK, Smith D, Weisfeldt ML, and Flaherty JT (1989) Measurement and characterization of postischemic free radical generation in the isolated perfused heart. J Biol Chem 264 18890-18895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zweier JL and Talukder MA (2006) The role of oxidants and free radicals in reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 70 181-190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]









