Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Vector Borne Dis. 2006 Jun;43(2):77–83.

Relationship between malaria and filariasis transmission indices in an endemic area along the Kenyan Coast

Ephantus J Muturi a, Charles M Mbogo b, Zipporah W Ng'ang'a c, Ephantus W Kabiru c, Charles Mwandawiro d, Robert J Novak a, John C Beier e
PMCID: PMC2673496  NIHMSID: NIHMS99757  PMID: 16967820

Abstract

Background & objectives:

An entomological survey was conducted to determine the relationship between malaria and lymphatic filariasis transmission by Anopheles gambiae s.l. and An. funestus in two inland villages along the Kenyan coast.

Methods:

Mosquitoes were sampled inside houses by pyrethrum spray sheet collection (PSC). In the laboratory, the mosquitoes were sorted to species, dissected for examination of filarial infection and the anophelines later tested for Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite proteins by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results:

From a total of 2,032 female mosquitoes collected indoors, An. gambiae s.l constituted 94.4% while the remaining 5.6% comprised of An. funestus and Culex quinquefasciatus. None of the Cx. quinquefasciatus was positive for filarial worms. P. falciparum sporozoite rate for An. gambiae s.l. from both villages was significantly higher than Wuchereria bancrofti infectivity rate. Similarly, the entomological inoculation rate for An. gambiae s.l. was significantly higher than the corresponding W. bancrofti infective biting rate and transmission potential for both the villages. Mass treatment of people with filaricidal drugs in Shakahola in the ongoing global elimination of lymphatic filariasis campaign seemed to have reduced the indices of filariasis transmission but had no effect on malaria transmission.

Interpretation & conclusion:

These results indicate the intensity of malaria transmission by anophelines to be much higher than that of lymphatic filariasis in areas where both diseases co-exist and re-emphasise the need to integrate the control of the two diseases in such areas.

Keywords: An. funestus, An. gambiae s.l., Kenyan coast, Plasmodium falciparum, transmission, Wuchereria bancrofti

Introduction

Malaria and lymphatic filariasis (LF) are Africa's most important vector-borne diseases. Current estimates indicate that 90% of the 1.5–3 million deaths due to malaria occur in Africa1 and over one-third of the 146 million people infected with LF are from this continent2. In rural areas of the Kenyan coast, both diseases co-exist in the same human populations with Anopheles gambiae s.s., An. arabiensis and An. funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) playing the dual role in their transmission3, 4. In addition, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) initially considered an urban vector of LF has also been shown to be an equally important vector in rural settings4, 5. Thus most communities in these areas are at continued risk of contracting and experiencing the morbidity associated with both diseases.

Despite the co-endemicity of malaria and LF in the same human communities and the sharing of common vectors, control programmes have been targeting each disease, individually, operating in a “vertical” orientation with little concern for other health problems in the same area6. However, the World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa is currently implementing a new framework for vector control based on a strategy of integrated vector-management targeting both diseases simultaneously. This strategy is perceived not only to be cost-effective7 but also feasible and has received a boost from successful results of insecticide-treated bednets against malaria and LF vectors3, 8-10. Moreover, a combination of albendazole and ivermectin currently used in the ongoing global programme for elimination of lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) has been reported to have an added advantage of reducing the burden of intestinal helminthes in children11 and this corresponds positively with their school performance12. These findings demonstrate that the integrated control of parasitic infections is possible.

The first step towards designation and implementation of an integrated, simultaneous attack against malaria and LF would be to understand their local transmission characteristics. Studies in India13 and South America14 have demonstrated the occurrence of malaria and LF in the same human hosts. A similar study in Papua New Guinea reported the occurrence of multiple infections of malaria and LF in mosquitoes15. Our preliminary findings along the Kenyan coast revealed the occurrence of concomitant infections of malaria and LF both in humans and in mosquitoes16. Although we did not observe any significant interaction between malaria and filarial parasites in humans, Wuchereria-infected An. gambiae s.l. had significantly higher Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite rate than non-infected mosquitoes. However, concurrent transmission of such infections appeared rare, presumably due to reduced survival rates of mosquitoes. We therefore, hypothesised that differential control of either malaria or LF would reduce the number of mosquitoes carrying mixed infections of the two diseases thereby increasing their survival rates. This would in turn result in increased transmission of the other disease and hence, the need for integrating the control of the two diseases. The aim of the current study was, therefore, to compare the relationship between the intensity of malaria and LF transmission by anophelines in an area endemic for both the diseases in Malindi, Kenya. The results provide important baseline information necessary for designation and implementation of the currently advocated integrated disease control strategy.

Material & Methods

The study was conducted in Shakahola and Jilore villages in Malindi district in coastal, Kenya between September 2002 and February 2003. The study area and the sampling design have been described in details elsewhere16. In brief, the study area is hot and humid all year round with the annual mean temperatures ranging between 22.5 and 34°C and the average relative humidity ranging between 60 and 80%. Rainfall is bimodal with the long rainy season between April and June and the short spell during October–November. The population is mainly composed of the Giriama, one of the nine tribes of Miji Kenda occupying the Kenyan Coast. Giriama houses are palm-thatched huts with mud walls and no ceiling. Domestic water in both villages is collected from the permanent Sabaki River. In Jilore, there is a small lake called ‘Lake Jilore’ where some fishing is carried out. Hospital records indicate malaria due to P. falciparum to be an important health problem in both villages, and accounted for 40.5 and 29.5% of the total clinical cases in Jilore and Shakahola, respectively in the year 200217. However, the field entomological and parasitological indices of malaria transmission in the two villages are unknown. Lymphatic filariasis is also endemic in both villages as depicted by the high number of people with overt symptoms of the disease (Mwandawiro, personal communication). Currently, there is an ongoing LF control programme in Shakahola, while in Jilore there has never been any LF control programme. Five months before the commencement of this study, all the inhabitants in Shakahola village had taken the first annual single dose combination of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole drugs. The prevalence of micro-filariaemia in humans before treatment was 17.7% while the filarial infectivity rate was 3% in An. gambiae s.l. and 1% in An. funestus (Mwandawiro, unpublished report).

Mosquitoes were sampled indoors by pyrethrum spray sheet technique18 between 0700 and 1000 hrs. Due to logistical difficulties sampling in the two villages was uneven. In Shakahola, mosquitoes were collected in each of the ten houses once in a month over a three-month period namely; September 2002, and January and February 2003. In Jilore, the collections were done over a 6-month period between September 2002 and February 2003. All the mosquitoes were identified morphologically to species using taxonomic keys19. The head, thorax and abdomen of each An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes were put on a slide, macerated separately in a drop of phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4) and examined under a compound microscope for filarial worms20. The number of larvae were counted to determine the infection load per mosquito. The debris of each dissected Anopheles mosquito was then preserved individually in plastic vials and later tested for P. falciparum circumsporozoite proteins using ELISA21.

The indices of malaria and LF transmission were calculated according to Bruce-Chwatt22, Bushrod20 and World Health Organization23. The sporozoite rate was taken as the proportion of mosquitoes positive for P. falciparum sporozoites out of the total number of mosquitoes tested. The daily human biting rate (HBR) was obtained by dividing the total number of blood fed and half gravid mosquitoes caught in a house by the total number of people who slept in that house the night preceding collection. The product of the average daily HBR and the number of days in the 3-month and the 6-month sampling period in Shakahola and Jilore, respectively yielded the HBR for the entire sampling period. The entomological inoculation rate (EIR) for the same period was derived as the product of HBR and sporozoite rate.

Filarial infectivity rate was calculated as the proportion of mosquitoes carrying at least one infective (L3) larva while the infective biting rate (IBR) was derived as the product of the HBR and filarial infectivity rate. Worm load, the average number of worms per infective mosquito was calculated by dividing the total number of infective larvae by the number of mosquitoes carrying infective larvae. The transmission potential (TP) was derived as the product of worm load and the IBR.

Data were entered into the computer using the FoxPro programme and analysed using SPSS software (version 11 for widows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The differences in malaria and filariasis transmission indices in each village were compared by independent sample t-test. Results were considered significant, when p < 0.05.

Results & Discussion

Three vector species—An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus, and Cx. quinquefasciatus were collected in the study area. An. gambiae s.l., and An. funestus harboured both malaria and filaria infections while none of the 53 Cx. quinquefasciatus collected was positive for filaria infections. Table 1 shows the entomological indices for the transmission of malaria and Bancroftian filariasis by An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus in two villages. In Jilore, the HBR for An. gambiae s.l. (n = 1,734) over the 6-month period was 768.4 while that of An. funestus (n = 58) was 116.8. The corresponding value in Shakahola over the 3-month period was 463.1 for An. gambiae s.l. (n = 185). HBR for An. funestus was not estimated in Shakahola because only two specimens of this species were captured. Based on EIR and TP results, An. gambiae s.l. was the main vector of malaria and LF in two villages over the sampling period, with An. funestus playing a secondary role. The sporozoite rate for each village was significantly higher than the corresponding infectivity rate (t = 9.593 and 2.945, p < 0.05). The EIR of 59.15 for An. gambiae s.l. in Jilore was 7-fold higher than the corresponding LF IBR, whereas in Shakahola, the EIR for An. gambiae s.l. was 27 and 12-fold higher than the corresponding IBR. The overall EIR value for Jilore was 2-fold higher than the transmission potential (TP) whereas in Shakahola, the EIR value was 12-fold higher than that of TP (t = 9.867 and 3.095, p < 0.05).

Table 1.

Entomological parameters for the transmission of malaria and Bancroftian filariasis in Jilore and Shakahola villages in Malindi, Kenya

Village Species No. dissected Proportion
infective for
filarial worms
HBR IBR Worm
load
TP SP EIR
Jilore An. gambiae s.l. 1734 0.011 768.4 8.5 3.8 32.1 0.077 59.2
An. funestus 58 0.017 116.8 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.017 2.0
Shakahola An. gambiae s.l. 185 0.005 463.1 2.33 1.0 2.4 0.059 27.33
An. funestus 2 0 0

HBR: Human biting rate; IBR: Infective biting rate; TP: Transmission potential; SP: Sporozoite rates; EIR: Entomological inoculation rate.

This study identified An. gambiae s.l. to be the main vector of P. falciparum and W. bancrofti in the study area with An. funestus playing a minor role. Each individual from the two villages receives a single malaria-infective bite from An. gambiae s.l. every three days compared with 91 days for An. funestus in Jilore. Similarly, an individual receives a single infective bite from An. gambiae s.l. every six days in Jilore and every 39 days in Shakahola compared with 91 days for An. funestus. These results are within the range that have been reported previously along the Kenyan coast3-5, and indicate that the intensity of malaria and LF transmission is species-specific. We did not, however, attempt to compare the transmission indices for the two villages because the sampling effort for the two villages was unequal due to logistical difficulties, making the samples for the two villages incomparable. We, therefore, treated each village separately and by doing so we are conservative in reporting the site-to-site variation in indices of transmission by An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus although it appeared evident and has also been reported previously4,5. Moreover, we were unable to implicate Cx. quinquefasciatus with LF transmission in the study area despite previous reports that it is equally an important vector in rural areas of coastal Kenya5.

The study indicates that although An. gambiae s.l. played the dual role in transmission of P. falciparum and Wuchereria bancrofti, the intensity of malaria transmission (P. falciparum) was higher compared to that of LF transmission. Transmission indices for malaria were higher than those of LF in both the village. It is known that the latent period of W. bancrofti in the vector is usually long in relation to the vector life expectancy24. In contrast, the extrinsic cycle of malaria parasites lasts 9–10 days but can sometimes last for only five days25. Consequently more filarial-infected mosquitoes than malaria-infected ones are likely to die before the parasites mature to the infective stage. A support for this is seen in our previous work in the same study area where 17 mosquitoes harboured both P. falciparum sporozoites and immature stages of W. bancrofti while only two had sporozoites and infective larvae16. Moreover, Maxwell et al26 argue that mosquitoes sampled using knockdown spray collection, are likely to yield fewer mosquitoes with infective larvae of W. bancrofti, as most infective larvae are lost during feeding. However, the number of infective mosquitoes caught by knockdown spray collection did not differ significantly from those of the human landing catches5.

Our results indicate that although one round of mass administration of filaricidal drugs may significantly reduce the intensity of LF transmission, it has no effect on the intensity of malaria transmission. In Shakahola where mass administration of DEC and albendazole had been conducted five months before the present study, the EIR was 12-fold higher than that of filariasis TP. These findings are consistent with those from Papua New Guinea, where one round of mass administration of DEC alone reduced the ATP of Anopheles-transmitted W. bancrofti by 76–79% and microfilariae intensity by 64–75%27. Previously, we have documented that in areas where the two diseases co-exist, the life span of An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes that pick-up both parasites concurrently seem to be greatly reduced to allow for simultaneous transmission of the two parasites16. Similar observations have been reported in An. punctulatus in Papua New Guinea15. Thus, control of LF alone may result to an increase in mosquito survival probability resulting to intense transmission of malaria. These findings support the need for integrated control of two diseases. Currently, the roll back malaria (RBM) partnership aims to ensure that malaria is no longer a public health problem by 2025, while the global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) aims to achieve a similar result for LF by 2020. Since the two diseases share common vectors, some synergy between the two programmes not only seems feasible and cost-effective but will also ensure that vector control, which is currently not well defined in GPELF as it is in RBM, becomes an integral part of LF control.

Due to logistical difficulties we were unable to conduct blood meal analysis and identification of sibling species of An. gambiae s.l. We assumed that all blood fed and half gravid An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus mosquitoes collected had taken their blood meals from humans. Previous studies along the Kenyan coast have reported a high human blood index among An. funestus and the three sibling species of An. gambiae complex occurring along the Kenyan coast—An. gambiae s.s., An. arabiensis and An. merus28,29. The proportion of An. gambiae s.l. sibling species in these areas has been reported to be 81.9, 12.8 and 5.3% for An. gambiae s.s., An. arabiensis and An. merus, respectively4.

In conclusion, this study has evaluated the intensity of malaria and LF transmission along the Kenyan coast. The results indicate that the intensity of malaria and LF transmission is species-specific. The results further demonstrate that in areas where the two diseases co-exist and share common vectors, the intensity of malaria transmission is higher than that of LF transmission. In addition, these findings demonstrate how differential control of LF may impact negatively on malaria transmission as a result of increased survival of vector mosquitoes. There is, therefore, an urgent need to adopt an integrated control of the two diseases in areas where they coexist, taking into account the local transmission characteristics.

Acknowledgement

We thank the staff of Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Centre for Microbiological Research, Nairobi, particularly Sammy Njenga, Moses Wamwea, Doris Nzomo and Charles Lang'at for their assistance in mosquito sampling. We are also grateful to the entire staff of Entomology Department, Kilifi Unit for their technical support. This study was supported by NIH grants. The paper is published with the permission of the Director, Kenya Medical Research Institute.

References

  • 1.Africa Malaria Report. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Michael E, Bundy D. Global mapping of lymphatic filariasis. Parasit Today. 1997;13:472–7. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(97)01151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pedersen E, Mukoko D. Impact of insecticide-treated materials on filaria transmission by the various species of vector mosquito in Africa. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:S91–S95. doi: 10.1179/000349802125002437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mbogo C, Mwangangi J, Nzovu J, Gu W, Yan G, Gunter JT, Swalm C, Keating J, Regens L, Shililu J, Githure J, Beier JC. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of Anopheles mosquitoes and Plasmodium falciparum transmission along the Kenyan coast. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:734–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mwandawiro C, Fujimaki Y, Mitsui YMK. Mosquito vectors of Bancroftian filariasis in Kwale district Kenya. East African Med J. 1997;74:288–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buck A, Anderson R, MacRae A. Epidemiology of polyparasitism: occurrence, frequency and distribution of multiple infections in rural communities in Chad, Peru, Afganistan and Zaire. Tropenmed Parasit. 1978;29:61–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Manga L. Vector-control synergy between ‘Roll Back Malaria’ and the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis, in the African Region. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:S129–S132. doi: 10.1179/000349802125002473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maxwell C, Myamba J, Njunwa K, Greenwood B, Curtis CF. Comparison of bednets impregnated with different pyrethroids for their impact on mosquitoes and on re-infection with malaria after clearance of pre-existing infections with chlorproguanil-dapsone. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:4–11. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90158-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mbogo C, Baya N, Ofulla A, Githure J, Snow R. The impact of permethrin-impregnated bednets on malaria vectors of the Kenyan coast. Med Vet Entomol. 1996;10:251–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bogh C, Pedersen E, Mukoko D, Ouma J. Permethrin-impregnated bednet effects on resting and feeding behaviour of lymphatic filariasis vector mosquitoes in Kenya. Med Vet Entomol. 1998;12:52–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Michael JB, Thomas GS, David GA, Rosette P, Jacquelin MR, Patrick JL. Assessment of combined ivermectin and albendazole for treatment of intestinal helminth and Wuchereria bancrofti infections in Haitian schoolchildren. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:479–86. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sternberg RJ, Powell C, Mcgrane P, Grantham-Mcgregor SM. Effects of a parasitic infection on cognitive functioning. J Exptl Psychol. 1997;3:67–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ghosh S, Yadav R. Naturally acquired concomitant infections of Bancroftian filariasis and human Plasmodia in Orissa. Indian J Malariol. 1995;32:32–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chadee DD, Rawlins C, Tiwari T. Concomitant malaria and filariasis infections in George Town, Guyana. Trop Med Int Hlth. 2003;8:140–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burkot T, Molineaux L, Graves R, Paru R, Battistutta D, Dagoro H, Barnes A, Wirtz R, Garner P. The prevalence of naturally acquired multiple infections of Wuchereria bancrofti and human malaria in anophelines. Parasitol. 1990;100:369–75. doi: 10.1017/s003118200007863x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Muturi JE, Mbogo CM, Ng'ang'a ZW, Kabiru EW, Mwandawiro C, Beier JC. Concomitant infections of Plasmodium falciparum and Wuchereria bancrofti on the Kenyan coast. Filaria J. 2006;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1475-2883-5-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Malindi District Health Report for 2001–2002 & 2003. Ministry of Health; Govt. of Kenya: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Methods and Techniques. pt II. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1975. Manual on practical entomology in malaria. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afro-tropical region), Johannesberg. Publ South Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:1–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bushrod FM. Studies on filariasis transmission in Kwale, a Tanzanian coastal village, and the results of mosquito control measures. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1979;73:277–85. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1979.11687257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wirtz R, Zavala F, Graves P, Andre G. Field evaluation of ELISA for P. falciparum and P. vivax sporozoites in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from Papua New Guinea. J Med Entomol. 1987;24:433–7. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/24.4.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bruce-chwatt L. Essential malariology. II edn. William Heinemann Medical Books; London: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lymphatic filariasis: IV report of the WHO expert committee on filariasis. No 702. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dye C. The analysis of parasite transmission by blood sucking insects. Ann Rev Entomol. 1992;37:1–19. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bradley D, Newbold CI, Warrell DA. Malaria. In: Weatherall D, Ledingham JGG, Warrell DA, editors. Oxford Textbook of Medicine. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Maxwell C, Curtis CF, Haji H, Kisumku S, Thalib AI, Yahya SA. Control of Bancroftian filariasis by integrating therapy with vector control using polystyrene beads in wet pit latrines. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84:709–14. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(90)90158-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bockarie MJ, Hii JL, Alexander ND, Bockarie F, Dagoro H, Kazura JW, Alper MP. Mass treatment with ivermectin for filariasis control in Papua New Guinea: impact on mosquito survival. Med Vet Entomol. 1999;13:120–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00159.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mbogo C, Kabiru EW, Muiruri SK, Nzovu MJ, Ouma JH, Githure JI, Beier J. Bloodfeeding behaviour of Anopheles gambiae s.l. and Anopheles funestus in Kilifi district, Kenya. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc. 1993;9:225–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mwangangi J, Mbogo C, Nzovu J, Githure J, Yan G, Beier J. Blood meal analysis for anopheline mosquitoes sampled along the Kenyan coast. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc. 2003;19:371–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES