Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2009 Apr 7;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-40

Progress in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection in Ukraine: results from a birth cohort study

Claire Thorne 1,✉, Igor Semenenko 2, Tatyana Pilipenko 2, Ruslan Malyuta 2; the Ukraine European Collaborative Study Group
PMCID: PMC2674441  PMID: 19351387

Abstract

Background

Ukraine was the epicentre of the HIV epidemic in Eastern Europe, which has the most rapidly accelerating HIV epidemic world-wide today; national HIV prevalence is currently estimated at 1.6%. Our objective was to evaluate the uptake and effectiveness of interventions for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) over an eight year period within operational settings in Ukraine, within the context of an ongoing birth cohort study.

Methods

The European Collaborative Study (ECS) is an ongoing birth cohort study in which HIV-infected pregnant women identified before or during pregnancy or at delivery were enrolled and their infants prospectively followed. Three centres in Ukraine started enrolling in 2000, with a further three joining in September 2006.

Results

Of the 3356 women enrolled, 21% (689) reported current or past injecting drug use (IDU). Most women were diagnosed antenatally and of those, the proportion diagnosed in the first/second trimester increased from 47% in 2000/01 (83/178) to 73% (776/1060) in 2006/07 (p < 0.001); intrapartum diagnosis was associated with IDU (Adjusted odds ratio 4.38; 95%CI 3.19–6.02). The percentage of women not receiving any antiretroviral prophylaxis declined from 18% (36/205) in 2001 to 7% in 2007 (61/843) (p < 0.001). Use of sdNVP alone substantially declined after 2003, with a concomitant increase in zidovudine prophylaxis. Median antenatal zidovudine prophylaxis duration increased from 24 to 72 days between 2000 and 2007. Elective caesarean section (CS) rates were relatively stable over time and 34% overall. Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rates decreased from 15.2% in 2001 (95%CI 10.2–21.4) to 7.0% in 2006 (95%CI 2.6–14.6). In adjusted analysis, MTCT risk was reduced by 43% with elective CS versus vaginal delivery and by 75% with zidovudine versus no prophylaxis.

Conclusion

There have been substantial improvements in use of PMTCT interventions in Ukraine, including earlier diagnosis of HIV-infected pregnant women and increasing coverage with antiretroviral prophylaxis and the initial MTCT rate has more than halved. Future research should focus on hard-to-reach populations such as IDU and on missed opportunities for further reducing the MTCT rate.

Background

Ukraine has the most severe HIV epidemic in the whole of Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States with an estimated 440,000 people living with HIV/AIDS and an adult HIV prevalence rate of 1.6% [1-3]. Ukraine was the epicentre of the HIV epidemic in the region [4] and although injecting drug use (IDU) was the main driver of the epidemic, heterosexual transmission has subsequently increased substantially [5-8]. The increased heterosexual transmission of HIV is closely linked to risky sexual behaviour among and with injecting drug users [3]. Women account for nearly half of the infected population, with an estimated 190,000 women living with HIV/AIDS, the vast majority in their child-bearing years [8].

Most HIV infections in children occur through mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), which can take place in utero, intrapartum and through breastfeeding [9]. The WHO/UNAIDS Strategic response to prevention of HIV infection in infants involves four "pillars"-primary prevention of infection in women, prevention of unintended pregnancies in HIV-infected women, prevention of transmission from HIV-infected women to their infants and provision of treatment, care and support to HIV-infected women and their families [10,11]. Interventions effective for the prevention of MTCT (PMTCT) include antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis, elective caesarean section (CS) and avoidance of breastfeeding [12]. In resource-rich settings, where antenatal highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is extensively used, MTCT rates have declined from around 16–25% in non-breastfeeding women to less than 1–2% [13-15]. In resource-limited settings, various abbreviated ARV prophylactic regimens have been shown to be effective PMTCT interventions, with single dose nevirapine (sdNVP) the most commonly used to date, although concerns exist regarding emergence of resistance following sdNVP exposure [12,16].

Ukraine adopted its first Programme for Preventing HIV in Newborns in 2001 [17], involving an opt-out universal antenatal HIV testing policy, sdNVP for infected mothers and their infants and provision of free infant formula. Following a review in 2003, the programme was updated with zidovudine (ZDV) starting from at least 28 weeks gestation and one week of neonatal ZDV prophylaxis to replace sdNVP; for women identified as HIV-infected after 28 weeks gestation, the addition of sdNVP to ZDV for mother and infant was recommended, while infants of mothers identified intrapartum should also receive extended (four weeks) ZDV prophylaxis [18].

Our aim was to evaluate the uptake and effectiveness of PMTCT interventions over an eight year period in Ukraine, within a multicentre cohort study of HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants, the European Collaborative Study (ECS).

Methods

Study setting and subjects

The ECS is an ongoing birth cohort study, in which HIV-1 infected pregnant women are enrolled and their infants prospectively followed according to a standard protocol. The ECS was established in 1985 in Western Europe to estimate the rate of and risk factors for MTCT [19]. Centres from Ukraine joined in 2000: sites in Odessa, Mykolaiv and Simferopol started enrolling at the start of 2000 and those in Kiev, Donetsk and Mariupol in September 2006 [15].

In Ukraine, antenatal care services are free of charge (including HIV testing), and antenatal care coverage increased from 90% in 1999 to 99% in 2007, with almost all deliveries taking place in health facilities. For 2003–2007, the infant mortality estimate was 14 per 1,000 live births [20]. Pregnant women in Ukraine are screened for HIV infection at pregnancy registration and for those testing negative there is repeat testing at around 30 weeks gestation. HIV testing is free and included within the standard antenatal care package. A national policy for offering rapid testing during labour for women who have presented with unknown HIV status, was introduced in 2003, those who were tested positive received sdNVP prophylaxis. All pregnant women identified as HIV-infected before or during pregnancy, or through intrapartum testing, were invited to participate in the ECS, with informed consent. Data are collected anonymously on standard questionnaires, using study serial numbers, without personal identifiers (linked anonymous data). Information collected includes maternal socio-demographic and clinical information, delivery and infant characteristics. Flow cytometry became available in Odessa and Simferopol in 2004; Donetsk and Kiev had this capacity from their first enrolments in autumn 2006. HIV-infected infants were diagnosed based on persistence of HIV antibody beyond age 18 months up until the start of 2006; subsequently, early diagnosis of HIV-exposed infants with PCR testing was introduced nationwide, with facilities in three inter-regional laboratories. However, coverage (both nationally and within ECS sites) remains patchy due to slow uptake of the rapid testing service in some AIDS centres and a period when no rapid testing was available at one of the inter-regional laboratories due to technical problems [21]; 40% (276/698) of infants born in 2006 and enrolled in the ECS had PCR test results available.

Definitions

Infants with persistence of antibody beyond 18 months of age and/or a positive virological marker of infection regardless of age were included as HIV-infected. If a child was HIV antibody-negative and no virus had been detected, (s)he was classified as uninfected, regardless of age. Elective CS deliveries were classified as occurring before rupture of membranes and onset of labour. Premature delivery was defined as occurring before 37 completed weeks of gestation. Injecting drug use (IDU) history (current or past) was assigned according to self-report, clinical report or neonatal drug withdrawal symptoms. Maternal moderate/severe HIV symptoms were defined as those in WHO Clinical stage 3 or 4. Multiple births (32 twin pairs) were treated as separate mother-child pairs.

Data analysis

Univariable comparisons were assessed with the χ2 test for categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to obtain unadjusted odd ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in analyses identifying factors associated with timing of maternal HIV diagnosis and to investigate risk factors for non-receipt of ARV prophylaxis and for MTCT. The analyses for factors associated with pre-pregnancy diagnosis were limited to 2871 women with complete data available on: mode of HIV acquisition, time period, maternal age and HIV symptoms. The regression analyses of intrapartum maternal diagnosis included the above variables and were limited to 2336 women with unknown HIV status at conception. The analysis investigating non-receipt of ARV prophylaxis included time of maternal HIV diagnosis, maternal age, mode of acquisition, gestational age and time period, with 3224 women with complete data included. The analysis of MTCT risk included 1635 mother-child pairs with known infant infection status and no missing information on the explanatory variables (prematurity, mode of delivery, ARV prophylaxis, IDU history and breastfeeding). Statistical analyses were performed with SAS (v8.02, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Ethics approval

The ECS has been approved by the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust/Institute of Child Health Ethics Committee.

Results

HIV-infected pregnant women

By January 2008, 3356 mother-child pairs had been enrolled. Most women were young, nulliparous, married or cohabiting and reported no specific HIV acquisition risk factors (Table 1). Fifteen (0.5%) women were born outside Ukraine, mostly elsewhere in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Of the 689 women with an IDU history, 357 (52%) were current and 332 (48%) previous users. The proportion of women reporting an IDU history declined from 36% (88/245) in 2000/01 to 29% (152/530) in 2002/03, 24% (230/978) in 2004/05 and 14% (219/1537) in 2006/07 (χ2trend = 96.1, p < 0.001).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants

N (%)
Median age (range) 25.6 years (14–44)
Parity at enrolment (n = 3324)
0 2026 (61)
1 966 (29)
≥2 332 (10)
History of pregnancy termination (n = 3325)
0 1948 (59)
1 715 (21)
≥2 662 (20)
Age at leaving full-time education
Median (IQR) 17 years (16–19)
Marital status (n = 3328)
Married 1372 (41)
Cohabiting 1324 (40)
Single, divorced, widowed 632 (19)
Mode of acquisition of HIV (n = 3356)
Injecting drug use 689 (21)
Injecting drug using partner 735 (22)
Other heterosexual contact 375 (11)
Other risk 9
No specific risk factor reported 1548 (47)
Timing of mother's first positive HIV test (n = 3356)
Before pregnancy 893 (27)
First/second trimester 1517 (45)
Third trimester 631 (19)
In pregnancy (date not specified) 81 (2)
Delivery 234 (7)
Maternal HIV clinical stage (n = 2956)
Asymptomatic/mild symptoms 2838 (96)
Moderate/severe symptoms 118 (4)
Gestational age (n = 3354)
<37 weeks 298 (9)
≥37 weeks 3056 (91)
Birth weight (n = 3354)
Median (range) 3100 g (850–5000 g)
Neonatal prophylaxis (n = 3356)
None 484 (14)
sdNVP only 773 (23)
ZDV 1907 (57)
sdNVP and ZDV 121 (4)
Type not recorded 71 (2)
Open in a new tab

Timing of maternal HIV diagnosis

Most women received their first HIV diagnosis in pregnancy (Table 1). The proportion of women with a pre-pregnancy HIV diagnosis increased slightly from 25% (58/236) in 2000/01 to 31% (476/1536) in 2006/07, whilst the proportions diagnosed in the third trimester and intrapartum more than halved, decreasing in the same years from 30% (71/236) to 14% (219/1536) and from 10% (24/236) to 4% (65/1536) respectively. Among women with unknown HIV status at the start of pregnancy, the proportion diagnosed in the first or second trimester increased from 47% in 2000/01 (83/178) to 73% (776/1060) in 2006/07 χ2 = 49.4, p < 0.001).

Factors associated with mothers having received a pre-pregnancy HIV diagnosis were investigated (Table 2). An IDU history, having an IDU sexual partner, moderate/severe HIV symptoms and older age were significantly associated with pre-pregnancy diagnosis; additionally, women enrolling in 2006/07 were nearly twice as likely to know their infection status before pregnancy as those enrolling in 2000/01. Maternal HIV diagnosis intrapartum was associated with IDU, with IDUs having a four-fold increased risk of diagnosis at this late stage than other women (Table 3). The reduced likelihood of intrapartum diagnosis in the later years of the study lost statistical significance in the adjusted model.

Table 2.

Factors associated with diagnosis of HIV infection prior to pregnancy

N N (%) diagnosed pre-pregnancy Odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), p value
Mode of acquisition
Non IDU, no IDU sex partner 1573 338 (21) 1.00 1.00
Non IDU, IDU sex partner 696 195 (28) 1.42 (1.16–1.75) 1.46 (1.19–1.80) p < 0.001
IDU 601 263 (44) 2.85 (2.33–3.48) 2.94 (2.38–3.63) p < 0.001
Maternal age
<25 years 1303 298 (23) 0.65 (0.52–0.80) 0.79 (0.63–0.99) p = 0.04
25–30 years 939 300 (32) 1.02 (0.82–1.27) 1.12 (0.90–1.41) p = 0.31
≥30 years 629 198 (31) 1.00 1.00
Maternal moderate/severe HIV symptoms
No 2753 733 (27) 1.00 1.00
Yes 118 63 (53) 3.16 (2.18–4.58) 2.32 (1.57–3.42) p < 0.001
Time period of delivery
2000–2001 187 45 (24) 1.00 1.00
2002–2003 431 99 (23) 0.94 (0.63–1.41) 1.06 (0.70–1.60) p = 0.8
2004–2005 977 243 (25) 1.05 (0.73–1.51) 1.19 (0.81–1.74) p = 0.37
2006–2007 1276 409 (32) 1.49 (1.04–2.12) 1.87 (1.29–2.72) p < 0.001
Open in a new tab

95%CI – 95% confidence interval

Table 3.

Factors associated with intrapartum diagnosis of HIV infection

N N (%) diagnosed intra-partum Odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), p value
Mode of acquisition
Non IDU, no IDU sex partner 1433 97 (7) 1.00 1.00
Non IDU, IDU sex partner 523 26 (5) 0.72 (0.46–1.12) 0.73 (0.47–1.14) p = 0.17
IDU 380 99 (26) 4.85 (3.57–6.60) 3.62 (2.61–5.03) p < 0.001
Maternal age
<25 years 1117 75 (7) 1.00 1.00
25–30 years 727 73 (10) 1.55 (1.11–2.17) 1.30 (0.92–1.85) p = 0.17
≥30 years 492 74 (15) 2.46 (1.75–3.46) 1.90 (1.32–2.72) p < 0.001
Marital status
Single, divorced, widowed 425 69 (16) 1.00 1.00
Married or cohabiting 1911 153 (8) 0.45 (0.33–0.61) 0.55 (0.39–0.76) p < 0.001
Time period of delivery
2000–2001 169 21 (12) 1.00 1.00
2002–2003 373 49 (13) 1.07 (0.62–1.84) 1.27 (0.72–2.26) p = 0.40
2004–2005 734 87 (12) 0.95 (0.57–1.58) 1.16 (0.67–1.98) p = 0.60
2006–2007 1060 65 (6) 0.46 (0.27–0.78) 0.66 (0.38–1.15) p = 0.14
Open in a new tab

95%CI – 95% confidence interval

Use of antenatal and intrapartum antiretroviral prophylaxis

Overall, 93% of women received ARV drugs in pregnancy or in labour (Table 1) and Figure 1 illustrates the time trends in use of prophylaxis. The percentage of women receiving no prophylaxis declined from 18% (36/205) in 2001 to 7% in 2007 (61/843) (χ2 = 11.0 p < 0.001). Intrapartum HIV diagnosis, premature delivery and IDU were associated with increased likelihood of women receiving no prophylaxis, whilst increasing calendar period was associated with a substantially decreased risk (Table 4). Women receiving both ZDV and sdNVP were more likely to have been diagnosed in the third trimester than women receiving ZDV alone (23% [245/1088] vs 11% [125/1126] χ2 = 51.8, p < 0.001), reflecting national policy; duration of ZDV prophylaxis among women receiving ZDV+sdNVP was half of that among women receiving ZDV only (35 days vs 71 days). Median ZDV prophylaxis duration increased from 24 to 72 days between 2000 and 2007. The proportion of women taking antenatal ZDV for less than 31 days decreased from 62% in 2000/01 (63/101) and 2002/03 (204/330) to 24% (153/643) in 2004/05 and 7.5% (87/1160) in 2006/07 (χ2trend = 493.0, p < 0.001). Antenatal HAART use increased from 1.6% (1/61) in 2001 to 7% (60/844) in 2007. Of the 174 women on HAART, 16 (9%) had initiated this before pregnancy, with a median duration of 82 weeks (range 44–160) before pregnancy. The remaining women received HAART for a median of 11 weeks (range 1–36) during pregnancy.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Trends in use of antenatal and intrapartum antiretroviral prophylaxis/treatment.

Table 4.

Factors associated with non-receipt of antenatal or intrapartum antiretroviral prophylaxis

N N (%) with non-receipt Odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Time of maternal HIV diagnosis
Pre-pregnancy 886 93 (11) 1.00 1.00
1st/2nd trimester 1500 18 (1) 0.10 (0.06–0.17) 0.12 (0.07–0.20) p < 0.001
3rd trimester 617 50 (8) 0.75 (0.52–1.08) 0.79 (0.54–1.15) p = 0.21
Intrapartum 221 68 (31) 3.79 (2.65–5.42) 3.43 (2.34–5.01) p < 0.001
Maternal age
<25 years 709 69 (10) 1.00 1.00
25–30 years 1453 84 (6) 0.57 (0.41–0.79) 0.87 (0.60–1.25) p = 0.45
≥30 years 1062 76 (7) 0.72 (0.51–1.01) 0.86 (0.59–1.24) p = 0.41
Mode of acquisition
Non IDU, no IDU sex partner 1829 106 (6) 1.00 1.00
Non IDU, IDU sex partner 728 27 (4) 0.63 (0.41–0.96) 0.60 (0.38–0.93) p < 0.001
IDU 667 96 (14) 2.73 (2.04–3.66) 1.44 (1.03–2.01) p < 0.001
Gestational age at delivery
≥37 2937 176 (6) 1.00 1.00
<37 287 53 (18) 3.55 (2.54–4.97) 2.21 (1.53–3.18) p < 0.001
Time of delivery
2000–2001 224 38 (17) 1.00 1.00
2002–2003 488 26 (5) 0.28 (0.16–0.47) 0.23 (0.13–0.41) p < 0.001
2004–2005 978 68 (7) 0.37 (0.24–0.56) 0.37 (0.23–0.60) p < 0.001
2006–2007 1534 97 (6) 0.33 (0.22–0.50) 0.43 (0.28–0.68) p < 0.001
Open in a new tab

95%CI – 95% confidence interval

Infants

Overall, 34% (n = 1153) of infants were delivered by elective CS, 3% (n = 104) by emergency CS and 63% (n = 2099) vaginally. Among mother-child pairs from the three centres enrolling since 2000 (n = 2809) elective CS rates increased from 30% (62/205) in 2001 to 41% (210/509) in 2007 (χ2trend = 12.6, p < 0.001). Overall, there were substantial centre differences, with an elective CS rate of 60% (410/689) in Simferopol versus 10% (11/115) in Kiev. Most neonates received ZDV prophylaxis (Table 1), of whom, 85% (1708/2016) received one week of ZDV syrup and 15% (n = 294) four weeks (no data on duration for 12 children). Type of antenatal and/or intrapartum prophylaxis was significantly associated with neonatal ZDV use, with neonatal prophylaxis taken by 44% (108/246), 35% (228/654), 68% (1546/2281) and 83% (145/174) of infants born to mothers who received no ARV prophylaxis, sdNVP only, antenatal ZDV and HAART respectively (χ2 = 296.4, p < 0.001).

A total of 35 (1%) infants were breastfed; there was no significant trend over time, with 1.5% (4/267) breastfed in 2000/01, 0.7% (4/574) in 2002/03, 1.3% (13/978) in 2004/05 and 0.9% (14/1537) in 2006/07 (p = 0.6). Three of the breastfeeding mothers were diagnosed as HIV-infected following intrapartum rapid testing, 14 through antenatal testing and the remaining 18 (51%) diagnosed pre-pregnancy. Median breastfeeding duration among the 10 mother-child pairs with information available was 2 weeks (range 1–23).

MTCT rates and risk factors

The overall MTCT rate was 11.4% (95%CI 9.9–13.0), with 192 children infected and 1498 uninfected; 1666 had indeterminate status, of whom 1132 (68%) were aged <18 months at the time of analysis. MTCT rates decreased from 15.2% in 2001 (26/171, 95%CI 10.2–21.4) to 7.0% in 2006 (6/86, 95%CI 2.6–14.6; limited to children aged ≥18 months old at last follow-up visit). Unadjusted MTCT rates by mode of delivery were 14.0% (141/1010, 95%CI 11.9–16.3) for vaginal deliveries, 19.3% (11/57, 95%CI 10.0–31.9) for emergency CS and 6.5% (40/623, 95%CI 4.7–8.8) for elective CS deliveries. Among women receiving no ARV prophylaxis, the unadjusted MTCT rate was 26.7% (32/120, 95%CI 19.0–35.5), decreasing to 15.7% (62/395, 95%CI 12.3–19.7) with sdNVP only, 7.0% (20/286, 95%CI 4.3–10.6) with ZDV, 9.2% (75/813, 95%CI 7.3–11.4) with ZDV and sdNVP and 3.9% (3/76, 95%CI 0.8–11.1) with HAART. Overall, IDUs had a significantly higher unadjusted MTCT rate compared with women with no IDU history (16.4% [67/409] vs 9.9% [121/1226] χ2 = 12.2, p < 0.001), but within the IDU group MTCT rates were similar between women with current and prior use (16.5% [33/200] vs 16.3% [34/209] respectively, p = 0.95). Sixteen of the 35 breastfed infants had known infection status at last follow up, of whom 6 (37.5%) were infected (95%CI 15.2–64.6%).

Maternal HIV clinical disease stage (classified as asymptomatic/mild [WHO clinical stages 1 and 2] vs moderate/severe [stages 3 and 4]) was not significantly associated with MTCT risk (p = 0.96). MTCT risk more than doubled with premature delivery, increased 1.8-fold with maternal IDU history and five-fold with any breastfeeding in univariable analysis, while use of ARV prophylaxis and elective CS significantly decreased transmission risk (Table 5). In adjusted analysis, risk of transmission was reduced by 43% for women delivering by elective CS versus vaginal delivery and use of sdNVP halved transmission risk, with the reduction increasing to 86% for women on antenatal HAART (Table 5). Women receiving ZDV only were 72% less likely to transmit than those untreated (Table 5), and 50% less likely than women on sdNVP only (AOR 0.50; 95%CI 0.29–0.88, p = 0.02).

Table 5.

Risk factors associated with mother-to-child transmission

N Odds ratio (95%CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI), p value
Premature delivery
No 1491 1.00 1.00
Yes 144 2.22 (1.44–3.43) p < 0.001 1.43 (0.90–2.28) p = 0.13
Mode of delivery
Vaginal 964 1.00 1.00
Emergency CS 57 1.44 (0.73–2.86) p = 0.29 1.58 (0.78–3.19) p = 0.20
Elective CS 614 0.42 (0.29–0.61) p < 0.001 0.57 (0.38–0.86) p = 0.007
Antenatal/intrapartum ARVs
None 110 1.00 1.00
SdNVP 370 0.49 (0.30–0.81) p = 0.006 0.55 (0.33–0.92) p = 0.02
ZDV 280 0.20 (0.11–0.36) p< 0.001 0.28 (0.14–0.53) p < 0.001
ZDV with sdNVP 799 0.26 (0.16–0.42) p < 0.001 0.41 (0.24–0.69) p < 0.001
HAART 76 0.11 (0.03–0.36) p < 0.001 0.16 (0.05–0.54) p = 0.004
IDU history
No 1266 1.00 1.00
Yes 409 1.79 (1.30–2.47) p < 0.001 1.31 (0.92–1.86) p = 0.13
Breastfeeding
None 1620 1.00 1.00
Any 15 5.27 (1.85–15.0) p = 0.002 3.07 (1.02–9.24) p = 0.046
Open in a new tab

95%CI – 95% confidence interval

Discussion

In this cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants, we have explored the effectiveness of the Ukraine PMTCT programme in operational settings. We have documented earlier diagnosis of HIV-infected pregnant women, increasing coverage with ARV prophylaxis and decreasing MTCT rates, against a background of increasing annual enrolments. The absolute numbers of IDU women enrolling in the study actually increased in 2007 compared to 2006 (data not shown), but we report a declining proportion of women with IDU history over time, reflecting trends towards increasing heterosexual transmission in the Ukraine [3,15]. MTCT rates more than halved between 2001 and 2006, with around one in fourteen women transmitting infection to their infants in 2006.

Prompt identification of HIV-infected pregnant women is essential for a successful PMTCT programme [12]. Around one in four women here were aware of their HIV diagnosis before conception, and nearly three-quarters had been diagnosed by the start of their third trimester. Women with IDU histories or IDU sexual partners and those with HIV symptoms were more likely to have a pre-pregnancy HIV diagnosis than other women which probably indicates their increased likelihood of accessing voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) outside pregnancy compared with other women. The increased likelihood of pre-pregnancy diagnosis in 2006/07 versus 2000/01 suggests improvements in VCT coverage over time; a national protocol for VCT was not approved by the Ministry of Health until December 2005, which is consistent with this time trend. Access to harm reduction programmes for IDUs increased nationwide within the framework of a Global Fund supported programme, particularly during 2005–2007, which is also likely to have contributed to increasing coverage of VCT for IDUs, including female IDUS.

Among women becoming pregnant with unknown HIV status, IDUs were more than 3.5 times more likely to be diagnosed through intrapartum rapid testing than women with a non-IDU-related mode of acquisition, indicating reduced access to antenatal care and thus the application of less effective PMTCT interventions. It is well recognised that this marginalised group of women frequently experience problems accessing health and social services [22,23]. In a study in St Petersburg, Russian Federation among women presenting in labour with unknown HIV status, largely without antenatal care, two-thirds were IDUs [24]; HIV seroprevalence was 6.5% among women without antenatal testing, substantially higher than the 1–2% among women accessing antenatal care [25,26].

Our results indicate the greater effectiveness of antenatal ZDV compared with sdNVP in PMTCT, consistent with previous findings [12]. As the few women receiving antenatal HAART had clinical and/or immunological indications for HIV treatment, which are associated with increased MTCT risk [9], one might potentially expect a greater reduction in transmission risk than the 84% seen here associated with HAART use if HAART were implemented as prophylaxis for all women [13,15], which is planned for Ukraine's next PMTCT programme, from 2009. Around 18% of women delivering in 2007 received sdNVP alone or with ZDV. Although current WHO guidelines [12] recommend that where possible a 3TC and ZDV "tail" should be provided postnatally for mothers receiving sdNVP, to reduce the likelihood of NVP resistance developing [16], this was not included within the Ukraine PMTCT programme. It remains unclear to what extent NVP resistance could compromise success of subsequent treatment of mother and child with NNRTI-containing regimens [27-30].

Elective CS was an effective PMTCT intervention in this setting, associated with a near-halving of risk, consistent with earlier results in Western Europe [14,31-33]. However, we documented considerable variation in the application of this PMTCT intervention across our study sites. Ukraine is a setting where formula feeding is acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable and safe and this is recommended for all HIV-positive women within the national policy. Although free breast milk substitutes are theoretically available, there are historic reports of limited access for some women [18,34]. Only around 1% of infants were breastfed, mostly for short durations. Breastfeeding was associated with a three-fold increased MTCT risk, although we were unable to determine the timing of transmission among HIV-positive breastfed infants. These findings are a pertinent reminder that appropriate feeding counselling and support for HIV-infected women [35] are needed even in settings where avoidance of breastfeeding is not generally perceived as problematic.

The halving of the MTCT rate since 2001 documented here marks the success of the national PMTCT programme, although key challenges remain which must be addressed if the country is to achieve the Dublin Declaration target of "virtual elimination" of HIV transmission to infants by 2010 [36]. Women least likely to receive ARV prophylaxis included IDUs and those diagnosed intrapartum, which mirrors findings from elsewhere in Europe [37-39]. Efforts are needed to address barriers that these women may face in accessing services, particularly as many may have concurrent infections, including hepatitis C [40] and sexually transmitted infections [41]. Linkages between harm reduction, oral substitution therapy and PMTCT services need to be established, with development of services targeted at hard-to-reach IDU pregnant women. It will also be important to improve quality of PMTCT interventions, including better access to CD4 count monitoring and HAART and improved coverage of early infant diagnosis. Primary prevention of HIV acquisition in women is the most effective approach for preventing infections in infants [11,23], but services in Ukraine remain under-developed, both those directed to at risk populations, such as IDUs, and for the general population. Nearly half of the women here reported no specific risk factors for HIV and most likely acquired infection heterosexually. As Ukraine has an HIV prevalence exceeding 1.5%, increasing heterosexual transmission and a young HIV-positive population (three-quarters aged 30 or less) [8,42], it is essential that concerted effort is directed towards primary prevention, as recommended by the recent UNAIDS-coordinated External Evaluation of the National AIDS Response [38].

Our study was limited by the observational nature of the data and although we adjusted for confounding factors in our multivariable analyses, there is potential for unmeasured confounding. Other limitations included the paucity of maternal CD4 counts and lack of HIV RNA measurements, which were not widely available within routine clinical practice. In a setting with limited access to early diagnosis for HIV-exposed infants, scope for loss to follow-up before infection status can be determined is considerable. Here, 15% of infants had indeterminate infection status despite being aged >18 months; applying the relevant transmission risks for the five strata of ARV prophylaxis applicable to these 535 children, we estimate that an estimated 65 (12.1%) would be infected. Adding this figure to the 1690 children with known infection status gives an overall MTCT estimate of 11.6% (c.f. 11.4% reported). Regarding the generalizability of our results, of the estimated 2731 HIV-infected women who delivered nationally in 2007 [38], nearly a third were enrolled in the ECS, suggesting that our cohort is representative of the HIV-infected pregnant population in Ukraine. Of note, as the ECS only includes women who deliver, characteristics may differ from women terminating their pregnancies.

Conclusion

Data from our study not only provide valuable information for the evaluation and strengthening of Ukraine's PMTCT programme, but also for the ongoing development of strategies for prevention of HIV infection in infants elsewhere in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The experience in Ukraine highlights that it is possible for a lower income country to make a substantial impact on MTCT (in this case, having of the MTCT rate in only five years) and underscores the appropriateness of the public health approach to prevention of HIV infections in infants recommended by WHO [10] and adopted in Ukraine with obvious success. Future research should focus on hard-to-reach populations such as IDU, in addition to the urgent issues of primary prevention and prevention of unintended pregnancies among HIV-positive women. In particular, scaling-up prevention of heterosexual transmission of HIV from and among IDUs will contribute to PMTCT in Ukraine.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CT and RM contributed to study concept and CT, RM, IS and TP contributed to study design. RM, IS and TP were involved in the acquisition of data. CT drafted the manuscript and performed the statistical analyses. The Ukraine European Collaborative Study Group contributed to the design and/or data collection for this study. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The ECS is a coordination action of the European Commission (PENTA/ECS 018865). Claire Thorne is supported by a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship. Some of this work was undertaken at GOSH/UCL Institute of Child Health which received a proportion of funding from the UK Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. The Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics also benefits from funding support from the Medical Research Council in its capacity as the MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/40/prepub

Contributor Information

Claire Thorne, Email: c.thorne@ich.ucl.ac.uk.

Igor Semenenko, Email: semenenkoigor@gmail.com.

Tatyana Pilipenko, Email: tanyaodessa@gmail.com.

Ruslan Malyuta, Email: rmalyuta@yahoo.com.

the Ukraine European Collaborative Study Group, Email: ecsadmin@ich.ucl.ac.uk.

Acknowledgements

The Ukraine European Collaborative Study Group consists of the following members who have contributed to this study: Dr K England, Prof ML Newell (UCL Institute of Child Health, UK), Y. Khomout (Perinatal Prevention of AIDS Initiative, Odessa, Ukraine), Dr S Posokhova (Regional Hospital, Odessa, Ukraine), Dr T Kaleeva, Dr. A. Shelyag, Dr. S. Servetsky (Odessa Regional Centre for HIV/AIDS, Ukraine), Dr A. Stelmah, Dr. G. Kiseleva, Dr O. A. Zalata (Crimean Republic Centre for HIV/AIDS, Ukraine), Dr. S. Solokha, Dr M. P. Grazhdanov (Donetsk Regional Centre for HIV/AIDS, Ukraine), Dr. N. Bashkatova (Marioupol AIDS Center, Ukraine), Dr. I. Raus, Dr O. V. Yurchenko (Kiev City Centre for HIV/AIDS, Ukraine), Dr. Z. Ruban, Dr. O. Gloushenko (Mikolaiv Regional Centre for HIV/AIDS, Ukraine).

References

  1. UNAIDS. 2008 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kruglov YV, Kobyshcha YV, Salyuk T, Varetska O, Shakarishvili A, Saldanha VP. The most severe HIV epidemic in Europe: Ukraine's national HIV prevalence estimates for 2007. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(Suppl 1):i37–i41. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.031195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. UNAIDS. Ukraine National Report on Monitoring Progress towards UNGASS Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS, Jan 2006–Dec 2007. Kiev: UNAIDS; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thomson MM, de Parga EV, Vinogradova A, Sierra M, Yakovlev A, Rakhmanova A, Delgado E, Casado G, Munoz M, Carmona R, Vega Y, Perez-Alvarez L, Contreras G, Medrano L, Osmanov S, Najera Rl. New insights into the origin of the HIV type 1 subtype A epidemic in former soviet union's countries derived from sequence analyses of preepidemically transmitted viruses. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:1599–604. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamers FF, Downs AM. HIV in central and eastern Europe. Lancet. 2003;361:1035–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12831-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aceijas C, Stimson GV, Hickman M, Rhodes T. Global overview of injecting drug use and HIV infection among injecting drug users. AIDS. 2004;18:2295–303. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200411190-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Semaille C, Alix J, Downs AM, Hamers FF. The HIV infection in Europe: large East-West disparity. Euro Surveill. 2003;8:57–64. doi: 10.2807/esm.08.03.00403-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. UNAIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update: December 2007. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thorne C, Newell ML. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection and its prevention. Curr HIV Res. 2003;1:447–62. doi: 10.2174/1570162033485140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Interagency Task Team on Prevention of HIV infection in pregnant women matc: Guidance on global scale up of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Towards universal access for women, infants and young children and eliminating HIV and AIDS among children. Geneva: WHO; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. World Health Organization. Strategic framework for the prevention of HIV infection in infants in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office For Europe; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants: towards universal access. Recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Townsend CL, Cortina-Borja M, Peckham CS, de RA, Lyall H, Tookey PA. Low rates of mother-to-child transmission of HIV following effective pregnancy interventions in the United Kingdom and Ireland, 2000–2006. AIDS. 2008;22:973–81. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f9b67a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warszawski J, Tubiana R, Le Chenadec J, Blanche S, Teglas JP, Dollfus C, Faye A, Burgard M, Rouzioux C, Mandelbrot L. Mother-to-child HIV transmission despite antiretroviral therapy in the ANRS French Perinatal Cohort. AIDS. 2008;22:289–99. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3d63c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. European Collaborative Study. The mother-to-child HIV transmission epidemic in Europe: evolving in the East and established in the West. AIDS. 2006;20:1419–27. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000233576.33973.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Arrive E, Newell ML, Ekouevi DK, Chaix ML, Thiebaut R, Masquelier B, Leroy V, Perre PV, Rouzioux C, Dabis F. Prevalence of resistance to nevirapine in mothers and children after single-dose exposure to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:1009–21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malyuta R, Newell ML, Ostergren M, Thorne C, Zhilka N. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection: Ukraine experience to date. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16:123–7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thorne C, Newell ML, Zhylka N. Prevention of HIV infection in infants: Documenting and learning from the Ukraine experience. Kiev: UNICEF; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. European Collaborative Study. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection. Lancet. 1988;2:1039–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. UCSR and Macro International. Ukraine Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. UNAIDS. Comprehensive External Evaluation of the National AIDS Response in Ukraine. Consolidated Report. Kiev, Ukraine: UNAIDS; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinkham S, Malinowska-Sempruch K. Women, harm reduction and HIV. New York: International Harm Reduction Development Program of the Open Society Institute; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ostergren M, Malyuta R. Elimination of HIV infection in infants in Europe – challenges and demand for response. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11:54–7. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2005.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hillis SD, Rakhmanova A, Vinogradova E, Voronin E, Yakovlev A, Khaldeeva N, Akatova N, Samarskaya M. Rapid HIV testing, pregnancy, antiretroviral prophylaxis and infant abandonment in St Petersburg. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18:120–2. doi: 10.1258/095646207779949781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kissin DM, Akatova N, Rakhmanova AG, Vinogradova EN, Voronin EE, Jamieson DJ, Glynn MK, Yakovlev A, Robinson J, Miller WC, Hillis S. Rapid HIV testing and prevention of perinatal HIV transmission in high-risk maternity hospitals in St. Petersburg, Russia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:183–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Khaldeeva N, Hillis SD, Vinogradova E, Voronin E, Rakhmanova A, Yakovlev A, Jamieson DJ, Ryder RW. HIV-1 seroprevalence rates in women and relinquishment of infants to the state in St Petersburg, Russia, 2002. Lancet. 2003;362:1981–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jourdain G, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Le Coeur S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Kantipong P, Leechanachai P, Ariyadej S, Leenasirimakul P, Hammer S, Lallemant M. Perinatal HIV Prevention Trial Group. Intrapartum exposure to nevirapine and subsequent maternal responses to nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:229–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Coffie PA, Ekouevi DK, Chaix ML, Tonwe-Gold B, Clarisse AB, Becquet R, Viho I, N'dri-Yoman T, Leroy V, Abrams EJ, Rouzioux C, Dabis F. Maternal 12-month response to antiretroviral therapy following prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV type 1, Ivory Coast, 2003–2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:611–21. doi: 10.1086/526780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chi BH, Sinkala M, Stringer EM, Cantrell RA, Mtonga V, Bulterys M, Zulu I, Kankasa C, Wilfert C, Weidle PJ, Vermund SH, Stringer JS. Early clinical and immune response to NNRTI-based antiretroviral therapy among women with prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine. AIDS. 2007;21:957–64. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32810996b2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lockman S, Shapiro RL, Smeaton LM, Wester C, Thior I, Stevens L, Chand F, Makhema J, Moffat C, Asmelash A, Ndase P, Arimi P, van Widenfelt E, Mazhani L, Novitsky V, Lagakos S, Essex M. Response to antiretroviral therapy after a single, peripartum dose of nevirapine. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:135–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. European Collaborative Study. Maternal viral load and vertical transmission of HIV-1: an important factor but not the only one. The European Collaborative Study. AIDS. 1999;13:1377–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. European Mode of Delivery Collaboration. Elective caesarean-section versus vaginal delivery in prevention of vertical HIV-1 transmission: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1035–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. The International Perinatal HIV Group. The mode of delivery and the risk of vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 – a meta-analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:977–87. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904013401301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Justice A, Drew D, Lee S. Review of the National Program to Prevent Mother-to-child Transmission of HIV/AIDS in Ukraine. Kiev: USAID; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  35. World Health Organization. HIV and infant feeding. Update based on the Technical Consultation held on behalf of the Inter-agency Task Team (IATT) on Prevention of HIV Infection in Pregnant Women, Mothers and their Infants. Geneva: WHO; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dublin Declaration on Partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia. Geneva: UNICEF; 2004. http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/The_Dublin_Declaration.pdf [Google Scholar]
  37. Mayaux MJ, Teglas JP, Blanche S. French Pediatric HIV Infection Study Group. Characteristics of HIV-infected women who do not receive preventive antiretroviral therapy in the French Perinatal Cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:338–43. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200311010-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. European Collaborative Study. HIV-infected pregnant women and vertical transmission in Europe since 1986. AIDS. 2001;15:761–70. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200104130-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. NHS Audit IaAU, UK and Ireland National Study for HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood, UK Children's HIV Association. Perinatal transmission of HIV in England, 2002–2005. London: NHS AIAU; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  40. Landes M, Newell ML, Barlow P, Fiore S, Malyuta R, Martinelli P, Posokhova S, Savasi V, Semenenko I, Stelmah A, Tibaldi C, Thorne C. Hepatitis B or hepatitis C coinfection in HIV-infected pregnant women in Europe. HIV Medicine. 2008;9:526–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Landes M, Thorne C, Barlow P, Fiore S, Malyuta R, Martinelli P, Posokhova S, Savasi V, Semenenko I, Stelmah A, Tibaldi C, Newell ML. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in HIV-1 infected pregnant women in Europe. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:925–36. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. World Health Organization Europe. European Health for All Database. Copenhagen: WHO Europe; 2008. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES