Abstract
Cholangiocyte proliferation is triggered during extrahepatic bile duct obstruction induced by bile duct ligation, which is a common in vivo model used for the study of cholangiocyte proliferation and liver fibrosis. The proliferative response of cholangiocytes during cholestasis is regulated by the complex interaction of several factors, including gastrointestinal hormones, neuroendocrine hormones and autocrine or paracrine signalling mechanisms. Activation of biliary proliferation (ductular reaction) is thought to have a key role in the initiation and progression of liver fibrosis. The first part of this review provides an overview of the primary functions of cholangiocytes in terms of secretin-stimulated bicarbonate secretion – a functional index of cholangiocyte growth. In the second section, we explore the important regulators, both inhibitory and stimulatory, that regulate the cholangiocyte proliferative response during cholestasis. We discuss the role of proliferating cholangiocytes in the induction of fibrosis either directly via epithelial mesenchymal transition or indirectly via the activation of other liver cell types. The possibility of targeting cholangiocyte proliferation as potential therapy for reducing and/or preventing liver fibrosis, and future avenues for research into how cholangiocytes participate in the process of liver fibrogenesis are described.
The liver is the largest internal organ of the body and is composed of two types of epithelial cells, hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (Ref. 1). Hepatocytes account for approximately 70% and cholangiocytes for 3−5% of the endogenous liver cell population (Refs 1, 2). Cholangiocytes line the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct system of the liver (Ref. 1). The bile ductules and ducts comprise a branched system of interconnected tubes, which collects bile secreted at the canalicular membranes of hepatocytes (Ref. 3), and delivers it to the gallbladder or the duodenum (Refs 1, 4). Although cholangiocytes represent a small proportion of the cells of the liver, they have an important pathophysiological role in the modification of the composition of bile during transit in the bile ducts (Refs 1, 4, 5 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). This process involves the secretion and absorption of water, electrolytes and other organic solutes from hepatocellular bile.
One of the most important and well-studied functions of cholangiocytes is the excretion of bicarbonate into bile, which is stimulated by secretin. Secretin receptors belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors (Ref. 11), which signal through the activation of adenylyl cyclase and protein kinase A (PKA) (Ref. 11). In the liver, secretin receptors are expressed only on cholangiocytes, on the basolateral membrane (Refs 12, 13). Secretin stimulates ductal bile secretion by a series of coordinated events (Fig. 1). First, secretin binds to the basolateral secretin receptors, which induces elevation of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) leading to the activation of PKA (Ref. 14). Subsequently, PKA phosphorylates the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) triggering the opening of this Cl− channel leading to secretion of Cl− at the apical membrane of cholangiocytes, which results in membrane depolarisation (Ref. 15). The Cl− efflux from CFTR creates a Cl− gradient that favours activation of the apically located exchanger (Ref. 16), which results in secretin-stimulated bicarbonate-enriched bile (Refs 1, 4, 6, 8, 10). In addition to PKA, another downstream target of cAMP, EPAC (exchange proteins activated directly by cyclic AMP), can also regulate Cl− channel function independently of PKA (Fig. 1) (Ref. 17). This has not been directly demonstrated to have a role in the cAMP-dependent activation of CFTR in cholangiocytes. However, it was recently shown that EPAC isoform 2 is involved in the mechanism regulating purinergic-receptor-induced cAMP signalling, which regulates the chemosensory functions of cholangiocyte primary cilia, suggesting that EPAC participates in the regulation of Cl− efflux (Ref. 18).
Figure 1. Regulation of cholangiocyte bicarbonate secretion by secretin.

Cholangiocytes are the only cell types in the liver expressing the basolateral secretin receptor. Secretin binds to the G-protein-coupled secretin receptor (SR), stimulating increased intracellular cAMP levels, which results in the activation of protein kinase A (PKA). Subsequently, PKA phosphorylates cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), stimulating Cl− efflux from the apical domain of cholangiocytes thereby activating the exchanger (AE2) and secretion of bicarbonate into the bile.
A number of studies have suggested that secretin receptor expression is linked to cholangiocyte proliferative responses in animal models of biliary hyperplasia, such as BDL, partial hepatectomy, chronic feeding of bile acids (e.g. taurocholic acid) and cirrhosis induced by administration of high levels of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) (Refs 1, 4, 19, 20, 21, 22). These models of cholangiocyte hyperplasia are closely associated with increased secretin-stimulated choleresis, which is characterised by increased secretin-receptor gene expression, elevated secretin-stimulated cAMP levels, enhanced exchanger activity and amplified secretin-stimulated bicarbonate secretion (Refs 1, 4, 7, 22). Thus, the response to secretin and secretin-receptor expression is a valuable pathophysiological tool (Refs 1, 4, 8, 10, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) that can be used to evaluate cholangiocyte proliferation. However, any role for secretin itself in the regulation of cholangiocyte proliferation has yet to be explored.
Research over the past decade has greatly improved our knowledge and understanding of the cellular and molecular factors regulating biliary proliferation (Refs 1, 28). In particular, several papers have demonstrated that proliferating cholangiocytes display neuroendocrine phenotypes, and hence secrete and respond to a number of hormones, neuropeptides and neurotransmitters (Refs 1, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). During the course of cholestasis, cholangiocytes undergo neuroendocrine transdifferentiation regulated by a number of neuroendocrine hormones. In support of the concept of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation, proliferating cholangiocytes acquire phenotypic features of neuroendocrine epithelium (Ref. 28), including expression of neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A, glycolipid A2-B4, S-100 protein, neural cell adhesion molecule, and the addition of neuroendocrine granules (Refs 33, 34). Activation of the neuroendocrine phenotype in cholangiocytes (Ref. 28), which is similar to that of hepatic stellate cells during liver disease development (Ref. 35), might have a key role in the progression of biliary fibrosis during cholestatic liver diseases [such as primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)], which target cholangiocytes, resulting in increased biliary proliferation and/or apoptosis in these disease states (Refs 1, 36). In the following sections, we explore the factors that regulate cholangiocyte proliferation in relation to their acquired neuroendocrine phenotype and factors controlling the potential contribution of the biliary system to liver fibrosis.
Regulators of cholangiocyte proliferation
Gastrointestinal hormones
The role of secretin in the regulation of biliary physiology has been thoroughly studied (Refs 1, 4, 6, 8, 9). The gastrointestinal hormones somatostatin and gastrin inhibit cholangiocyte responses to secretin by inhibiting secretin-induced intracellular cAMP levels and bicarbonate excretion into bile (Refs 8, 9, 10). Somatostatin and gastrin also inhibit cholangiocyte proliferation (Refs 22, 24, 37, 38). The antiproliferative actions of somatostatin occur upon its interaction with the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) (Ref. 22) and have been observed in both in vivo and in vitro models (Refs 10, 22, 38). The somatostatin analogue octreotide decreases cholangiocyte proliferation and periportal extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition (i.e. fibrosis) in response to biliary obstruction (Ref. 38). In isolated large cholangiocytes from rats with BDL, somatostatin inhibited both secretin receptor expression and proliferation as evaluated by measurement of DNA synthesis and H3 histone expression (Ref. 22). Recently, in a preclinical study in polycystic kidney (PCK) rats (a model of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease), the somatostatin analogue octreotide inhibited cholangiocyte proliferation and reduced liver fibrosis (Ref. 39). This study provides strong evidence for the use of octreotide in the treatment of patients with polycystic liver diseases and also indicates that octreotide might reduce biliary fibrosis in other liver disease paradigms (Ref. 39).
Similarly to somatostatin, gastrin inhibited secretin-induced ductal secretion and secretin-induced cAMP levels by interacting with cholecystokinin-B (CCK-B) receptors (Ref. 8). Chronic administration of gastrin has also been shown to inhibit cholangiocyte proliferation in BDL rats (Ref. 24). Interestingly, when gastrin was administered to rats with established BDL a reversal of cholangiocyte proliferation was also observed (Ref. 37).
The importance of intracellular cAMP signalling as a regulator of cholangiocyte proliferation was also demonstrated by chronic administration of forskolin (an adenylate cyclase activator) (Ref. 23) to normal rats (Ref. 23). Compared with control animals, forskolin administration to normal rats increased the number of bile ducts, intracellular cAMP levels and secretin-induced choleresis, as observed in animals with BDL (Ref. 23). Forskolin also stimulated the proliferation of isolated cholangiocytes, which was blocked by the inhibition of the PKA–Src–MEK–ERK1/2 pathway providing the first evidence that this signalling pathway was critical for cholangiocyte proliferation (Ref. 23).
A recent study demonstrated that glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) modulates cholangiocyte adaptive responses to cholestasis (Ref. 29). In addition to having a role in the modulation of glucose homeostasis, GLP1 induces the acquisition of neuroendocrine phenotypes by pancreatic ductal cells – cells that share similar origins and features as cholangiocytes (Refs 40, 41). GLP1 and its receptor antagonist extendin-4 both have similar effects whereby they stimulate cholangiocyte proliferation in control rats as well as in isolated cultures from control and BDL rats (Ref. 29). Expression of the GLP1 receptor (GLP1R) protein was significantly upregulated in BDL rats compared with sham-operated animals (Ref. 29). Cholangiocytes from BDL animals express mRNA for preproglucagon, the precursor of GLP1, unlike cells from normal rats (Ref. 29). This finding suggests that GLP1 is important in biliary growth during cholestasis. In fact, administration of exendin-4 significantly decreased ductal mass and biliary functional activity in BDL rats (Ref. 29). The proproliferative effect of GLP1 is mediated through phosphoinositide 3-kinase, cAMP–PKA and Ca2+–CAMKIIα signalling mechanisms (Ref. 29), and is yet another example of the importance of cAMP signalling in the regulation of biliary proliferation during cholestasis. A summary of the cholangiocyte proliferative responses regulated by gastrointestinal hormones is shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2. Regulation of cholangiocyte proliferation by gastrointestinal hormones.
Cholangiocytes express CCKBR, SSTR2 and GLP1R G-protein-coupled receptors on their basolateral membranes. The gastrointestinal hormones gastrin and somatostatin both inhibit cholangiocyte proliferation through mechanisms that inhibit intracellular cAMP levels. In addition, the somatostatin analogue octreotide inhibits hepatic fibrosis in the polycystic kidney (PCK) rat model and in rats after bile duct ligation, indicating the potential to limit hepatic fibrosis associated with biliary proliferation via the targeting of SSTR2. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) stimulates cholangiocyte proliferation by increasing intracellular cAMP levels with the concomitant activation of PI3K and Ca2+-CAMKIIα. Abbreviations: CCKBR, cholecystokinin-B receptor; GLP1R, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor; SSTR2, somatostatin receptor subtype 2.
Bile acids
Bile acids accumulate during cholestasis, resulting in greater exposure of cholangiocytes to their effects (Ref. 20). Bile acids also have varied effects on biliary function, apoptosis and growth. In vitro, both taurocholate and taurolithocholic acid (TLC) stimulated cholangiocyte proliferation and increased the secretin-induced cAMP response and exchanger activity in isolated rat cholangiocytes (Ref. 42). We, and others, have demonstrated that cholangiocytes express the apical Na+-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT; official symbol, NTCP2; gene symbol, Slc10a2) providing a mechanism to mediate bile acid uptake (Refs 43, 44). The concept that bile acids stimulate biliary proliferation was expanded to an in vivo model. Normal rats were fed a diet containing taurocholate or TLC (1%) for 1−4 weeks in order to mimic the bile acid accumulation observed during cholestasis (Ref. 20). Following bile acid feeding, there was an increase in cholangiocyte proliferation, secretin receptor gene expression and secretin-induced cAMP levels, similar to levels found in animals with BDL (Ref. 20). Cholangiocytes from these mice displayed secretin-stimulated bile flow and bicarbonate secretion that was not observed in control animals, but which was again similar to that in animals with BDL (Refs 4, 10, 20). Bile acid feeding (with taurocholate and TLC) was also shown to increase cholangiocyte Slc10a2 expression in a PKC-dependent mechanism, indicating a link between proliferation and bile acid accumulation during cholestasis (Ref. 45). Finally, ursodeoxycholate and taurodeoxycholate have been shown to inhibit cholangiocyte proliferation of BDL cholangiocytes, both in vitro and in vivo (Ref. 46). Secretin has been demonstrated to stimulate colchicine-sensitive ASBT translocation to the cholangiocyte plasma membrane, which was associated with increased taurocholate uptake, greater-than-expected biliary lipid secretion and bile flow, and the prolongation of the biliary transit time of taurocholate (Ref. 47). This work provides evidence that secretin stimulates cholehepatic shunting of bile acids through increased ASBT levels on the cholangiocyte apical membrane (Ref. 47). These findings are consistent with studies demonstrating that alternative splicing of the Slc10a2 mRNA results in the formation of a truncated form termed t-ASBT (Ref. 48). Transport studies have revealed that t-ASBT can function as a bile acid efflux protein on the basolateral membrane of cholangiocytes (Ref. 48).
Angiogenic factors
The peribiliary vascular plexus (PBP) stems from the hepatic artery, nourishes the biliary epithelium, and sustains a countercurrent of substances, such as VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and other angiogenic factors that are reabsorbed from bile towards the hepatocytes (Ref. 49). VEGF is secreted by a number of epithelia and modulates cellular functions by both autocrine and paracrine mechanisms (Ref. 50). VEGF is a key regulator of biliary proliferation during cholestasis (Ref. 49). Gaudio and colleagues elegantly demonstrated that proliferation of cholangiocytes precedes the expansion of the PBP in the intrahepatic biliary tree (Ref. 49). This finding suggests a crosstalk mechanism between cholangiocytes and vascular cells – an interaction that mediates the adaptive changes of biliary cells and the microvascular system in cholestatic liver diseases (Ref. 49). Cholangiocytes express VEGF receptors VEGFR2 and VEGFR3, and respond to VEGF-A and VEGF-C with increased proliferation (Ref. 31). In the BDL model, cholangiocytes have upregulated VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 protein expression and secrete increased levels of VEGF compared with normal cholangiocytes (Ref. 31). Indeed, immunoneutralisation of VEGF-A and VEGF-C decreases biliary proliferation during BDL (Ref. 31). The importance of these growth factors during biliary proliferation was also revealed by increased proliferation of cholangiocytes in normal rats chronically treated with recombinant VEGF-A and VEGF-C (Ref. 31). Furthermore, in BDL rats, interruption of the flow of the hepatic artery by ligation (HAL) induced: (1) the disappearance of the PBP; (2) increased cholangiocyte apoptosis and impaired biliary proliferation and secretin-stimulated ductal secretion; and (3) decreased cholangiocyte VEGF secretion (Ref. 51). HAL effects on the PBP and cholangiocyte functions were prevented by administration of r-VEGF-A, which, by maintaining the integrity of the PBP and cholangiocyte proliferation, prevents apoptosis and functional damage of bile ducts following ischaemic injury (Ref. 51). In contrast to the gastrointestinal hormone GLP1, VEGF induced cholangiocyte proliferation by activation of the inositol-(1,4,5)-trisphosphate (IP3)–[Ca2+]i–PKCα pathway and phosphorylation of Src and ERK1/2 (Ref. 31). These findings indicated that VEGF regulates cholangiocyte proliferation in an autocrine mechanism through the upregulation of VEGF secretion induced by cholestasis, which is another example of the differentiation of proliferating cholangiocytes to a neuroendocrine phenotype.
Furthermore, another important study evaluated the expression and the effect of angiogenic factors in cholangiocytes from autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients and from a ADPKD mouse model (Pkd2WS25/−) (Ref. 52). Cholangiocytes stained positively for VEGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and Ang-2 in ADPKD and Caroli disease, and for Ang-1 and Tie-2 in ADPKD (Ref. 52). VEGF stimulated the growth of normal and ADPKD (at higher extent) cholangiocytes (Ref. 52). VEGF expression on cholangiocytes positively correlated with microvascular density and the expression of VEGF, VEGFR, Ang-1 and Tie-2 was higher in cholangiocytes from ADPKD (Ref. 52). VEGF and Ang-1 have an autocrine proliferative effect on cholangiocyte growth and a paracrine effect on portal vasculature, thereby promoting the growth of the cysts and their vascular supply (Ref. 52). Moreover, VEGF receptor inhibition by SU-5416 blocks liver cyst growth in Pkd2WS25/− mice (Ref. 53), further supporting the concept that the VEGF signalling pathway is an important therapeutic target in the treatment of liver cysts in ADPKD (Ref. 53). Cholangiocytes are a major source of hepatic endothelin-1 (ET-1) production during the development of hepatopulmonary syndrome after BDL, indicating that cholangiocyte-derived ET-1 may be an important endocrine mediator of experimental hepatopulmonary syndrome (Ref. 54). Further studies into the role of angiogenic factors such as angiopoietin and ET-1 on the growth and neuroendocrine nature of cholangiocytes are necessary.
Nerve growth factor, neuropeptides and neurotransmitters
Cholangiocytes express the M3 acetylcholine (ACh) receptor, and ACh, by acting on M3 receptor subtypes, induces a Ca+-calcineurin-mediated potentiation of the secretin-induced adenylyl cyclase activity (Ref. 5). The role of ACh and the cholinergic system in the regulation of cholangiocyte proliferation was also explored in the model of total vagotomy in rats with BDL (Ref. 55). Vagotomy impairs cholangiocyte proliferation and enhances apoptosis, leading to decreased ductal mass in response to BDL (Ref. 55). Similarly, secretin-induced choleresis of BDL rats was virtually eliminated by vagotomy in association with decreased cholangiocyte cAMP levels (Ref. 55). Maintenance of cholangiocyte cAMP levels by forskolin administration prevents the effects of vagotomy on cholangiocyte proliferation, apoptosis, and secretion, which highlights the importance of cholinergic innervation in the regulation of biliary mass and, as mentioned earlier, the dependence of cholangiocyte proliferation on intracellular cAMP-dependent signalling mechanisms (Ref. 55).
Previous studies have demonstrated that sympathetic innervation is necessary for both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte proliferation during liver regeneration (Ref. 56). Adrenergic denervation of BDL rats via the administration of a single intraportal injection of 6-hydroxidopamine (6-OHDA): (1) inhibits cholangiocyte proliferation, and the number of bile ducts; (2) decreases secretin-stimulated choleresis and cholangiocyte cAMP levels; and (3) increases the number of cholangiocytes undergoing apoptosis (Ref. 57). Chronic administration of clenbuterol (a β2-adrenergic agonist) and dobutamine (a β1-adrenergic agonist) prevents the decrease in cAMP levels and secretion induced by 6-OHDA-induced denervation, maintains cholangiocyte proliferation and decreases cholangiocyte apoptosis (Ref. 57). The induction of cholangiocyte apoptosis induced by adrenergic denervation by 6-OHDA was prevented by taurocholate feeding (Ref. 58), which also restored cholangiocyte proliferation and secretin-stimulated ductal secretion that was decreased after adrenergic denervation (Ref. 58). These finding suggest that adrenergic innervation might have a key role in regulating cholangiocyte proliferation during regeneration and proliferation associated with cholestasis and could be a therapeutic target area.
We have recently demonstrated that the neuroendocrine hormone serotonin has a key role in the autocrine regulation of cholangiocyte proliferation (Refs. 59). Serotonin is thought to play a role in the origins of pruritus and fatigue, which are classical clinical features of PBC (Ref. 60, 61). Cholangiocytes express the serotonin 1A and 1B receptors and secrete serotonin (Ref. 59). Stimulation of these receptors markedly inhibited the growth of rat cholangiocytes during cholestasis via IP3–Ca2+–PKC signalling mechanism resulting in the downregulation of the cAMP-dependent proliferative signalling (Ref. 59). Of great importance, hyperplastic cholangiocytes isolated from BDL rats secrete serotonin, and cholangiocyte proliferation in response to cholestasis was enhanced both in vitro and in vivo, if serotonin secretion was immunoneutralised (Ref. 59). Serotonin is postulated to counterbalance the excessive proliferation responses of biliary epithelium during cholestasis (Ref. 59). Recent studies also demonstrated that cholangiocytes secrete nerve growth factor (NGF) (Ref. 30). In vitro, NGF stimulated the proliferation of cholangiocytes via AKT- and ERK1/2-dependent mechanisms (Ref. 30). In vivo, immunoneutralisation of NGF during BDL in rats resulted in decreased biliary mass and reductions in proliferation and enhanced apoptosis (Ref. 30). We propose that regulation of cholangiocyte proliferation by stimulatory and inhibitory autocrine or paracrine loops such as serotonin and NGF during cholestasis has an important role in the pathogenesis of cholestatic liver diseases. Examples of the stimulatory and inhibitory autocrine or paracrine loops are illustrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Stimulatory and inhibitory autocrine and paracrine feedback loops controlling cholangiocyte proliferation during cholestasis.
During cholestasis, cholangiocytes secrete higher levels of NGF, which can stimulate cholangiocyte proliferation in autocrine or paracrine mechanisms via activation of Trk-A on the basolateral membrane of cholangiocytes through increases in ERK1/2 and AKT activity. By contrast, during cholestasis, cholangiocytes secrete higher levels of 5-HT, which negatively regulates cholangiocyte proliferation via activation of IP3–Ca2+–PKC-dependent signalling mechanisms, resulting in the downregulation of intracellular cAMP levels. Abbreviations: 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin); 5HT1A/B, 5-HT receptor 1A/B; IP3, inositol triphosphate; NGF, nerve growth factor; pAKT, phosphorylated AKT; pERK1/2, phosphorylated extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2; PKC, protein kinase C; Trk-A, neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1.
The aminergic peptide and neurotransmitter histamine is responsible for many functions in the body, such as neurogenic functions, inflammatory and allergic responses, and gastric secretion (Refs 62, 63, 64). Normal and BDL cholangiocytes express all of the G-protein-coupled histamine receptor subtypes (HRH1, HRH2, HRH3 and HRH4) (Refs 65, 66); however, the expression of H3R is significantly increased in proliferating cholangiocytes following BDL (Ref. 65). Activation of H3R by chronically administering the agonist (R)-(α)-(−)-methylhistamine dihydrobromide (RAMH) to rats for 7 days after BDL resulted in a decrease in the growth of the biliary tree with no difference in the rate of apoptosis, suggesting that H3R activation slows the rate of proliferation rather than reduces the number of cholangiocytes by a cell-death mechanism (Ref. 65). In addition, administration of histamine to this animal model of cholestasis also resulted in a decrease in cholangiocyte proliferation, and blocking histamine actions by using the selective H3R antagonist thioperamide maleate resulted in a partial reversal of these effects (Ref. 65).
We have very recently demonstrated that sensory hepatic innervation and biliary expression of the α-type calcitonin gene-related peptide 1 (α-CGRP) regulates cholangiocyte proliferation during cholestasis induced by BDL (Ref. 67). CGRP is a potent vasodilator peptide (Refs. 68, 69) that participates in the regulation of vascular tone and regional organ blood flow (Refs. 70, 71) and knockout of α-CGRP decreases intrahepatic bile duct mass in BDL mice (Ref. 67). In vitro, both α- and β-CGRP stimulated proliferation of BDL cholangiocytes by activation of PKA and CREB (Ref. 67). These studies indicate that sensory innervation is important for regulation of biliary proliferation, and other sensory neuropeptides such as substance P could have a role in the chronic inflammation observed in certain cholangiopathies (Refs 72, 73, 74).
Steroid hormones
Steroid hormones such as oestrogen and progesterone have been shown to be proproliferative in a number of cell types (Refs 75, 76). Since PBC largely affects middle-aged women (when oestrogen and progesterone levels have dropped) (Ref. 77), a number of studies have evaluated the roles of oestrogen and progesterone in the regulation of biliary proliferation, in particular during cholestasis. Cholangiocytes express both the oestrogen (estrogen) receptor (ER)-α and ER-β subtypes, with a corresponding increase in the expression of ER-β in cholangiocytes isolated from rats with BDL for 3 weeks compared with control animals (Ref. 78). When cholangiocytes were stimulated in vitro with 17-β-estradiol, proliferation was significantly increased by ER-dependent activation of Src–Shc–ERK1/2 signalling mechanisms (Ref. 79). When BDL male rats were treated in vivo with anti-oestrogens such as tamoxifen or ICI182,760, or when BDL female rats were subjected to ovariectomy, the growth of the biliary tree was dramatically reduced, and cholangiocytes underwent cell death by apoptosis (Refs 78, 80). Based on these studies, the current working hypothesis is that oestrogens might delay the evolution of cholangiopathies into ductopaenia (Ref. 81). ER expression in cholangiocytes is markedly reduced in patients with late-stage PBC and ER modulators improve serum parameters of cholestasis in PBC patients (Refs 82, 83).
Recently, it has been demonstrated that the steroid hormone progesterone stimulates the proliferation of both male and female cholangiocytes (Ref. 84). Cholangiocytes express the PR-B nuclear receptor and several membrane receptors for progesterone (PRGMC1, PRGMC2 and mPRα) (Ref. 84). In vivo, progesterone increases the number of bile ducts of normal rats, whereas an antiprogesterone antibody inhibits cholangiocyte growth stimulated by BDL. Interestingly, normal and BDL cholangiocytes expressed the biosynthetic pathway (i.e. STAR, 3β-HSD, p450scc) produce and secrete progesterone (Ref. 84). In vitro studies performed in a normal rat cholangiocyte cell line (NRC) revealed that: (1) progesterone increased cholangiocyte proliferation; (2) supernatants collected from normal and BDL cholangiocytes increased cholangiocyte proliferation, which was partially inhibited by preincubation with antiprogesterone; and (3) inhibition of progesterone steroidogenesis with aminoglutethimide prevented cholangiocyte proliferation (Ref. 84). These findings further support the concept that neuroendocrine, autocrine or paracrine mechanisms have a key role in the modulation of cholangiocyte proliferative responses to cholestasis.
Other factors
Alvaro and colleagues have shown that cholangiocytes are a target cell type for the growth hormone (GH)–insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) pathway (Ref. 85). They demonstrated that GH induces IGF1 expression and release in isolated cholangiocytes, which is associated with the consequent stimulation of cell growth by IGF1 (Ref. 85). In addition, a recent study (Ref. 86) has demonstrated the expression of IGF1 isoforms in rat hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, and their involvement in the protection against cholestatic liver injury. Specifically, the authors have shown that the ‘locally acting’ IGF1 isoforms (expressed by hepatocytes and cholangiocytes) decreased during cell damage and increased during cell proliferation (Ref. 86). Furthermore, the ‘locally acting’ IGF1 was more active than the ‘circulating’ isoform in protecting cholangiocytes from glycochenodeoxycholate-induced cytotoxicity (Ref. 86). These findings indicate the presence of a stimulatory autocrine or paracrine loop in cholangiocytes.
The interaction of CD44 and hyaluronic acid was also among the proproliferative factors for cholangiocytes in cholestatic livers (Ref. 87). CD44 is a multifunctional cell adhesion molecule, which takes part in cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions (Refs 88, 89). Hyaluronic acid, the main component of the ECM, is the primary ligand of CD44 (Ref. 90). High levels of hepatic CD44 expression have been observed in patients with PSC and cholangiocarcinoma (Refs 91, 92). Compelling evidence that the proliferative cholangiocytes lining the intrahepatic ducts are a prime source of hepatic CD44 was reported when CD44-positive cholangiocytes were found closely associated with extracellular hyaluronan accumulated in the portal tracts of BDL livers (Ref. 87). In vitro, cholangiocyte proliferation was stimulated by hyaluronan treatment, and blocked by siRNA against CD44 or anti-CD44 antibody (Ref. 87). The interaction between CD44 and hyaluronan might have a pathogenic role in the development of cholestatic liver diseases by enhancing biliary proliferation (Ref. 87).
Secretion of profibrogenic factors by cholangiocytes
Several studies have demonstrated that proliferating cholangiocytes secrete profibrotic factors. During biliary fibrosis, proliferating bile duct epithelial cells are the predominant source of the profibrogenic connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (Ref. 93). In addition to hepatic stellate cells, activated bile duct epithelial cells are an important source of profibrogenic CTGF during biliary fibrosis (Ref. 93). One study aimed to localise the cellular sources of the collagens excessively deposited in the liver in the course of secondary biliary fibrosis (Ref. 94). Epithelial cells of newly formed bile ducts express mRNA for α1(IV) procollagen, indicating that proliferating cholangiocytes are a source of hepatic collagen during fibrosis (Ref. 94). Transforming growth factor-β2 (TGF-β2) expression is also a specific property of proliferating bile duct epithelial cells, and its expression is thought to be related to the formation of specialised periductular connective tissue during bile duct proliferation (Ref. 95).
Laminin synthesis occurs in mesenchymal, endothelial and bile duct epithelial cells in the liver (Ref. 96). In addition, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is expressed in proliferating cholangiocytes during experimental biliary fibrosis in rats (Ref. 97). Pentoxifylline exerts an antifibrogenic effect by reducing PDGF-induced ERK-dependent signalling and proliferation of ECM-producing cells (Ref. 98). Recently, it was demonstrated that the oral administration of an endothelin-A receptor antagonist blocks collagen synthesis and deposition in a rat model of liver fibrosis (Ref. 99). Indeed, proliferating cholangiocytes are the major source of hepatic ET-1 (Ref. 54), implicating cholangiocytes once again the process of hepatic fibrosis. The targeting of the profibrogenic programme that is activated in proliferating cholangiocytes, and the profibrogenic factors they secrete should enable the development of novel therapies for liver diseases that are associated with biliary fibrosis.
Evidence for biliary epithelium involvement in fibrosis associated with chronic liver diseases
Studies observing ductular reaction, which involves activation of the oval cell compartment, have pointed to the potential involvement of the biliary epithelium in fibrosis associated with other chronic liver diseases (Ref. 100). Although this area remains somewhat controversial as to cell origin (i.e. oval cell or cholangiocyte) and contribution, ductular reaction has also been shown to be associated with the severity of nonbiliary chronic liver diseases (Ref. 100). There is an association between the severity of liver disease and an increase in the number of oval cells (i.e. ductular reaction), consistent with the hypothesis that oval cell proliferation is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease (Ref. 100). Patients that underwent liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were shown to have a fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis demarcated by thin, perisinusoidal bands of fibrosis extending from portal tracts to surround plates of ductular-type epithelium (Ref. 101). Ductular reaction was also present in livers with fibrosis due to alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis C infection and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Refs. 102, 103, 104).
Cholangiocyte proliferation and activation of portal fibrosis
Liver fibrosis during acute and chronic cholestasis involves the stepwise process of ‘ductular reaction’, which refers to an increasing number of ductules (i.e. cholangiocyte proliferation), accompanied by polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and an increase in matrix, leading to periportal fibrosis and eventually biliary cirrhosis (Ref. 105). A number of studies have suggested that proliferating cholangiocytes have a role in the induction of fibrosis, either directly via epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), or indirectly via activation of other liver cell types. A number of very recent articles have implemented biliary EMT in the process of liver fibrosis. EMT refers to the process in which mature epithelial cells lose the cell–cell contacts and protein expression patterns characteristic of epithelia and acquire the phenotypic characteristics of mesenchymal cells. EMT has been shown to be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis by providing a source of fibrogenic myofibroblasts (Refs. 106, 107). Recently, EMT has been implicated as a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. In an elegant study of human samples from a variety of liver diseases, Diaz and colleagues present convincing histological data revealing that EMT occurs in human liver fibrosis, particularly in disease associated with prominent bile ductular proliferation, such as biliary atresia and PBC (Ref. 108). They observed significant colocalisation between CK19 (a cholangiocyte-specific epithelial marker) and other markers of EMT (vimentin, Snail and fibroblast-specific protein 1) in biliary atresia and PBC by using a multispectral imaging system. Interestingly, no evidence of hepatocyte EMT was observed in biliary atresia (Ref. 108). Robertson and co-workers also demonstrated that biliary EMT occurs during post-transplantation recurrence of PBC (Ref. 109). The biliary EMT was associated with cholangiocyte expression of S100A4 (a key marker of early fibroblast lineage), vimentin and pSMAD 2/3, and was driven by TGF-β (Ref. 109). S100A4 expression appears to occur before the appearance of other features of recurrent PBC, which suggests that EMT may be an initiating event and could explain the loss of bile duct epithelia in this disease (Ref. 109). Similar findings have been demonstrated by studies of rodents and humans, in which hepatic stellate cells and hepatic epithelial progenitor cells coexpress epithelial and mesenchymal markers, indicating that EMT occurs in adult livers (Ref. 110). Rygiel and colleagues have also clearly demonstrated that EMT contributes to portal tract fibrosis (Ref. 111). Their work shows that cholangiocytes forming small and mediumsized bile ducts, which then respond with ductular reaction, undergo EMT during chronic liver disease, which results in the formation of invasive fibroblasts (Ref. 111). The accumulating evidence indicates that EMT probably has a critical role in the process of portal fibrosis during chronic liver diseases.
In addition to EMT, studies have also demonstrated the potential for cholangiocytes to participate in crosstalk with other cell types in the liver, such as resident portal fibroblasts and injury-activated myofibroblastic hepatic stellate cells (Ref. 112). Hedgehog (Hh)-mediated mesenchymal–epithelial interactions have a role in modulation of the responses of both cell types during cholestasis induced by bile duct ligation (Ref. 112). Mesenchymal cells produce Hh ligands that enhance the viability and proliferation of cholangiocytes, which produce Hh ligands that promote the growth of myofibroblast cells. The authors of this study postulated that adult livers resurrect developmental signalling systems such as the Hh pathway to guide the remodelling of the biliary tree and stromal environments during cholestasis (Ref. 112). It has also been shown that proliferating cholangiocytes release PDGF-BB during biliary injury, stimulating the fibrogenic process (Refs 113, 114). PDGF-BB has been shown (1) to induce resident myofibroblast gene expression; (2) to promote the proliferation of lobular hepatic stem cells; and (3) to attract lobular myofibroblastic hepatic stellate cells into the portal tracts (Refs 113, 114). Other factors that stimulate cholangiocyte proliferation, such as steroid hormone and cAMP, might also contribute the crosstalk occurring during cholestasis. Further investigation of EMT and crosstalk interactions between cholangiocytes and myofibroblastic cells warrants further investigation and could provide novel therapeutic interventions for the fibrosis associated with chronic liver diseases.
Reducing fibrosis by targeting proliferating cholangiocytes
Several recent studies have demonstrated that the selected targeting of signalling mechanisms such as via avβ6 integrin and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) in cholangiocytes retards the progression of biliary fibrosis. Integrins are cellular receptors consisting of an α- and a β-subunit that form at least 24 different dimers, which mediate cell–cell and cell–ECM interactions (Ref. 115). Two recent studies have demonstrated that targeting avb6 integrin expressed by proliferating biliary epithelia might provide a novel antifibrotic therapy (Refs 116, 117). The avβ6 integrin is strongly upregulated in the proliferating biliary epithelium in animal models such as BDL, thioacetamide and Mdr2(Abcb4)−/− mice, and in human models of chronic hepatitis C (Refs 116, 117). This integrin also drives fibrogenesis via adhesion to fibronectin and stimulates autocrine or paracrine TFG-β1 activation (Ref. 116). Most importantly, a single dose of a small molecule αvβ6 integrin inhibitor in vivo induced expression of antifibrogenic and profibrolytic genes, reduced activated cholangiocyte proliferation and reduced adhesion to fibronectin (Refs 116, 117).
Troglitazone, an antidiabetic drug that activates PPARγ, inhibits bile duct proliferation and fibrosis during BDL in rodents (Ref. 118). The development of liver fibrosis was reduced in rats receiving troglitazone, as indicated by significant decreases of procollagen type I gene expression and liver hydroxyproline levels (Ref. 118). In addition, accumulation of cells expressing α-smooth muscle actin surrounding newly formed bile ducts after BDL, as well as total hepatic levels of SMA were partially inhibited by troglitazone treatment, indicating the presence of a reduced number and/or activation of hepatic stellate cells and myofibroblasts (Ref. 118). These findings suggest that limiting cholangiocyte proliferation might contribute to the reduced scarring seen in this system. Another area of interest for the development of future therapies may be targeted at the disruption of cholangiocyte secretion of profibrogenic factors, such as CTGF, or the blockade of their downstream signalling mechanisms in hepatic stellate cells.
Future perspectives
As our understanding of the autocrine and paracrine neuromodulators that regulate cholangiocyte proliferation during the progression of cholestatic liver diseases increases, so does our potential for the development of therapeutic strategies. The factors regulating cholangiocyte proliferation during cholestasis, which represent potential therapeutic targets are summarised in Table 1. Cholangiocyte proliferation is closely associated with a transdifferentiation of biliary epithelia to express neuroendocrine phenotypes and might provide unique signalling mechanisms that can be targeted for drug development (Ref. 28). Preventing or limiting cholangiocyte proliferation and the activation of expression of profibrotic genes and secretion of profibrotic factors during the progression of cholestatic liver diseases represent a novel first line defence to control and/or prevent fibrogenesis (Fig. 4). In addition, further studies addressing the interaction of proliferating cholangiocytes with other cell types, such as portal myofibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells, are needed. The potential connection between the switching on of the neuroendocrine phenotype in proliferating cholangiocytes and activation of liver fibrotic processes by fibroblasts should reveal potential novel signalling mechanisms that could be simultaneously targeted for therapeutic benefit. The challenge ahead will be to consistently and properly modulate these many signalling systems and the interactions between various cell types to implement successful pharmacological therapies.
Table 1.
Neuroendocrine and other factors affecting cholangiocyte proliferation
| Hormone | Receptor | Effect on proliferation | Role in fibrogenesis | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Somatostatin | SSTR2 | Counteracts the effect of secretin; inhibits proliferation | Somatostatin analogue octreotide inhibits cholangiocyte proliferation and hepatic fibrogenesis | 10, 22, 38 |
| Gastrin | CCKB/gastrin receptor | Counteracts the effect of secretin; reduces proliferation | Unknown | 24, 37 |
| GLP1 (Exendin-4) | GLP1R | GLP1 expressed by cholestatic cholangiocytes; stimulates proliferation | Unknown | 29 |
| VEGF | VEGR2 and VEGR3 | Secreted by cholangiocytes during cholestasis and stimulates cholangiocyte proliferation | Plays a role in rat liver fibrogenesis | 31, 119 |
| Oestrogen | ERα/β | Stimulates proliferation | Oestradiol has suppressive effects on dimethylnitrosamine-induced fibrosis of the liver in rats | 78, 79, 120 |
| Progesterone | PR-A/B | Stimulates proliferation of normal and cholestatic cholangiocytes | Unknown | 84 |
| NGF | Trk-A (NTRK1) | Secreted by cholestatic cholangiocytes; sustains the proliferative response to BDL | Markedly expressed in bile duct epithelial cells in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma | 30, 121 |
| Serotonin | 5HT1A and 5HT1B | Synthesised and secreted by cholangiocytes during cholestasis; reduces proliferation | Profibrogenic effects on hepatic stellate cells | 59, 122, 123 |
| Acetylcholine | M3 | Potentiates the effect of secretin; Required for cholangiocyte response to BDL; sustains cholangiocyte proliferation | Unknown | 5, 55, 124 |
| Ephinephrine, norepinephrine | β1-AR; β2-AR | Required for cholangiocyte response to BDL; sustains cholangiocyte proliferation | Sympathetic neurotransmitters promote liver fibrosis in mice | 57, 125 |
| Histamine (RAMH) | H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R | Reduces cholangiocyte proliferation in response to BDL | Increased hepatic histamine content during liver injury in rats | 65, 126 |
| CGRPα/β | CLR, RAMP1, RCP | CGRPα/β stimulate proliferation; lack of CGRP reduces biliary proliferation in response to BDL | Unknown | 67 |
| GH, IGF1 | GHR, IGF1R | Stimulates proliferation | Unknown | 85 |
| Troglitazone | PPARγ activator | Reduces ductular proliferation | Fibrosis during chronic cholestasis in rats | 118 |
| Hyaluronic acid | CD44 | Enhances proliferation during cholestasis | Marker of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C | 87, 127 |
Abbreviations: BDL, bile duct ligation; CCKB, cholecystokinin B; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; CLR, calcitonin-receptor-like receptor; ER, oestrogen (estrogen) receptor; GH, growth hormone; GLP1, glucagon-like peptide 1; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ; PR, progesterone receptor; RAMH, α-methyl histamine; RAMP1, receptor activity-modifying protein 1; RCP, receptor component protein; SSTR2, somatostatin receptor subtype 2; Trk-A, neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 4. Targeting cholangiocyte proliferation to limit or prevent fibrosis.
Cholangiocyte proliferation activated by cholestasis stimulates the neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of cholangiocytes. Cholangiocytes release autocrine or paracrine factors that regulate proliferative responses and also activate fibrogenic responses of portal fibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells, resulting in activated myofibroblasts and fibrogenesis. In addition, cholangiocytes can undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition and increase the number of fibrogenic cells in the portal areas. Therapies targeted to prevent and/or reduce cholangiocyte proliferation might play a novel role in the prevention and/or limitation of liver fibrosis.
Acknowledgements and funding
Portions of the studies discussed here were supported partly by a grant award from Scott & White to S.G., by the Dr Nicholas C. Hightower Centennial Chair of Gastroenterology from Scott & White; the VA Research Career Scientist Award, a VA Merit Award and the NIH grants DK76898, DK58411 and DK062975 to G.A. Alpini; by University and Federate Athenaeum funds from University of Rome “La Sapienza” to Eugenio Gaudio; and the MIUR grant PRIN #2007, prot. 2007HPT7BA_003 to D.A. The authors would like to thank the peer reviewers for their time and comments on the manuscript.
References
- 1.Alpini G, Prall RT, LaRusso NF. The pathobiology of biliary epithelia. In: Arias IM, et al., editors. In The Liver; Biology & Pathobiology, 4E. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 421–435. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Racanelli V, Rehermann B. The liver as an immunological organ. Hepatology. 2006;43:S54–62. doi: 10.1002/hep.21060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nathanson MH, Boyer JL. Mechanisms and regulation of bile secretion. Hepatology. 1991;14:551–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alpini G, et al. Biliary physiology in rats with bile ductular cell hyperplasia. Evidence for a secretory function of proliferated bile ductules. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1988;81:569–578. doi: 10.1172/JCI113355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alvaro D, et al. Role and mechanisms of action of acetylcholine in the regulation of rat cholangiocyte secretory functions. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1997;100:1349–1362. doi: 10.1172/JCI119655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alvaro D, et al. Effect of secretion on intracellular pH regulation in isolated rat bile duct epithelial cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1993;92:1314–1325. doi: 10.1172/JCI116705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Glaser S, et al. Heterogeneity of the intrahepatic biliary epithelium. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006;12:3523–3536. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i22.3523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Glaser S, et al. Gastrin inhibits secretin-induced ductal secretion by interaction with specific receptors on rat cholangiocytes. American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1997;273:G1061–1070. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1997.273.5.G1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kanno N, et al. Regulation of cholangiocyte bicarbonate secretion. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2001;281:G612–625. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.3.G612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tietz PS, et al. Somatostatin inhibits secretin-induced ductal hypercholeresis and exocytosis by cholangiocytes. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1995;269:G110–118. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1995.269.1.G110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ulrich CD, 2nd, Holtmann M, Miller LJ. Secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors, members of a unique family of G protein-coupled receptors. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:382–397. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70491-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Farouk M, et al. Secretin receptors in a new preparation of plasma membranes from intrahepatic biliary epithelium. Journal of Surgical Research. 1993;54:1–6. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1993.1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alpini G, et al. Upregulation of secretin receptor gene expression in rat cholangiocytes after bile duct ligation. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1994;266:G922–928. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1994.266.5.G922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alvaro D, Mennone A, Boyer JL. Role of kinases and phosphatases in the regulation of fluid secretion and exchange in cholangiocytes. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1997;273:G303–313. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1997.273.2.G303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McGill JM, et al. Secretin activates Cl2 channels in bile duct epithelial cells through a cAMP-dependent mechanism. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1994;266:G731–736. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1994.266.4.G731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martinez-Anso E, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of chloride/bicarbonate anion exchangers in human liver. Hepatology. 1994;19:1400–1406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Holz GG, et al. Cell physiology of cAMP sensor Epac. Journal of Physiology. 2006;577:5–15. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.119644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Masyuk AI, et al. Cholangiocyte primary cilia are chemosensory organelles that detect biliary nucleotides via P2Y12 purinergic receptors. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2008;295:G725–734. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90265.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.LeSage G, et al. Regrowth of the rat biliary tree after 70% partial hepatectomy is coupled to increased secretin-induced ductal secretion. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1633–1644. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(96)70027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alpini G, et al. Bile acid feeding induces cholangiocyte proliferation and secretion, evidence for bile acid-regulated ductal secretion. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:179–186. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70242-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alpini G, et al. gamma-Interferon inhibits secretin-induced choleresis and cholangiocyte proliferation in a murine model of cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. 1997;27:371–380. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alpini G, et al. Heterogeneity of the proliferative capacity of rat cholangiocytes after bile duct ligation. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1998;274:G767–775. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.274.4.G767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Francis H, et al. cAMP stimulates the secretory and proliferative capacity of the rat intrahepatic biliary epithelium through changes in the PKA/Src/MEK/ERK1/2 pathway. Journal of Hepatology. 2004;41:528–537. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Glaser S, et al. Gastrin inhibits cholangiocyte growth in bile duct-ligated rats by interaction with cholecystokinin-B/Gastrin receptors via D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-, Ca(2+)-, and protein kinase C alpha-dependent mechanisms. Hepatology. 2000;32:17–25. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.8265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.LeSage G, et al. Acute carbon tetrachloride feeding selectively damages large, but not small, cholangiocytes from normal rat liver. Hepatology. 1999;29:307–319. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.LeSage G, et al. Acute carbon tetrachloride feeding induces damage of large but not small cholangiocytes from BDL rat liver. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1999;276:G1289–1301. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1999.276.5.G1289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.LeSage G, et al. Regression of cholangiocyte proliferation after cessation of ANIT feeding is coupled with increased apoptosis. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2001;281:G182–190. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.1.G182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alvaro D, et al. Proliferating cholangiocytes, a neuroendocrine compartment in the diseased liver. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:415–431. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marzioni M, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and its receptor agonist exendin-4 modulate cholangiocyte adaptive response to cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:244–255. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gigliozzi A, et al. Nerve growth factor modulates the proliferative capacity of the intrahepatic biliary epithelium in experimental cholestasis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1198–1209. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gaudio E, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates rat cholangiocyte proliferation via an autocrine mechanism. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1270–1282. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marzioni M, et al. Control of cholangiocyte adaptive responses by visceral hormones and neuropeptides. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology. 2008 doi: 10.1007/s12016-008-8090-1. Jun 11 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roskams T, et al. Neuroendocrine features of reactive bile ductules in cholestatic liver disease. American Journal of Pathology. 1990;137:1019–1025. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Desmet V, Roskams T, Van Eyken P. Ductular reaction in the liver. Pathology, Research and Practice. 1995;191:513–524. doi: 10.1016/s0344-0338(11)80870-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ebrahimkhani MR, Elsharkawy AM, Mann DA. Wound healing and local neuroendocrine regulation in the injured liver. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine. 2008;10:e11. doi: 10.1017/S146239940800063X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lazaridis KN, Strazzabosco M, LaRusso NF. The cholangiopathies, disorders of biliary epithelia. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1565–1577. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Glaser S, et al. Gastrin reverses established cholangiocyte proliferation and enhanced secretin-stimulated ductal secretion of BDL rats by activation of apoptosis through increased expression of Ca2+- dependent PKC isoforms. Liver International. 2003;23:78–88. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2003.00814.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tracy TF, Jr., et al. Somatostatin analogue (octreotide) inhibits bile duct epithelial cell proliferation and fibrosis after extrahepatic biliary obstruction. American Journal of Pathology. 1993;143:1574–1578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Masyuk TV, et al. Octreotide inhibits hepatic cystogenesis in a rodent model of polycystic liver disease by reducing cholangiocyte adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1104–1116. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptides, regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Molecular Endocrinology. 2003;17:161–171. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bulotta A, et al. Cultured pancreatic ductal cells undergo cell cycle re-distribution and beta-cell-like differentiation in response to glucagon-like peptide-1. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 2002;29:347–360. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0290347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alpini G, et al. Bile acids stimulate proliferative and secretory events in large but not small cholangiocytes. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1997;273:G518–529. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1997.273.2.G518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alpini G, et al. Functional expression of the apical Na+-dependent bile acid transporter in large but not small rat cholangiocytes. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:1734–1740. doi: 10.1053/gast.1997.v113.pm9352879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lazaridis KN, et al. Rat cholangiocytes absorb bile acids at their apical domain via the ileal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1997;100:2714–2721. doi: 10.1172/JCI119816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alpini G, et al. Bile acid feeding increased proliferative activity and apical bile acid transporter expression in both small and large rat cholangiocytes. Hepatology. 2001;34:868–876. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.28884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alpini G, et al. Ursodeoxycholate and tauroursodeoxycholate inhibit cholangiocyte growth and secretion of BDL rats through activation of PKC alpha. Hepatology. 2002;35:1041–1052. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.32712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Alpini G, et al. Secretin activation of the apical Na+-dependent bile acid transporter is associated with cholehepatic shunting in rats. Hepatology. 2005;41:1037–1045. doi: 10.1002/hep.20653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lazaridis KN, et al. Alternative splicing of the rat sodium/bile acid transporter changes its cellular localization and transport properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97:11092–11097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200325297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gaudio E, et al. Hepatic microcirculation and peribiliary plexus in experimental biliary cirrhosis, a morphological study. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1118–1124. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(96)70081-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sartelet H, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGF-R1 [Flt-1] and VEGF-R2 [KDR/Flk-1]) in tumorlets and in neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of the lung. Human Pathology. 2004;35:1210–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gaudio E, et al. Administration of r-VEGF A prevents hepatic artery ligation-induced bile duct damage in bile duct ligated rats. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2006;291:G307–317. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00507.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fabris L, et al. Effects of angiogenic factor overexpression by human and rodent cholangiocytes in polycystic liver diseases. Hepatology. 2006;43:1001–1012. doi: 10.1002/hep.21143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Amura CR, et al. VEGF receptor inhibition blocks liver cyst growth in pkd2(WS25/-) mice. American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology. 2007;293:C419–428. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00038.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Luo B, et al. Cholangiocyte endothelin 1 and transforming growth factor beta1 production in rat experimental hepatopulmonary syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:682–695. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.LeSage G, et al. Cholinergic system modulates growth, apoptosis, and secretion of cholangiocytes from bile duct-ligated rats. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:191–199. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70567-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Iwai M, Shimazu T. Alteration in sympathetic nerve activity during liver regeneration in rats after partial hepatectomy. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System. 1992;41:209–214. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(92)90060-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Glaser S, et al. Adrenergic receptor agonists prevent bile duct injury induced by adrenergic denervation by increased cAMP levels and activation of Akt. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2006;290:G813–826. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00306.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Marzioni M, et al. Cytoprotective effects of taurocholic acid feeding on the biliary tree after adrenergic denervation of the liver. Liver International. 2007;27:558–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Marzioni M, et al. Autocrine/paracrine regulation of the growth of the biliary tree by the neuroendocrine hormone serotonin. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:121–137. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Swain MG, Maric M. Improvement in cholestasis-associated fatigue with a serotonin receptor agonist using a novel rat model of fatigue assessment. Hepatology. 1997;25:291–294. doi: 10.1002/hep.510250206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jones EA, Bergasa NV. The pathogenesis and treatment of pruritus and fatigue in patients with PBC. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 1999;11:623–631. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199906000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hou YF, et al. Modulation of expression and function of Toll-like receptor 3 in A549 and H292 cells by histamine. Molecular Immunology. 2006;43:1982–1992. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jancso G, et al. Inhibitory neurogenic modulation of histamine-induced cutaneous plasma extravasation in the pigeon. Regulatory Peptides. 2000;95:75–80. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(00)00140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Parsons ME, Ganellin CR. Histamine and its receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2006;147(Suppl 1):S127–135. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Francis H, et al. H3 histamine receptor agonist inhibits biliary growth of BDL rats by downregulation of the cAMP-dependent PKA/ERK1/2/ELK-1 pathway. Laboratory Investigation. 2007;87:473–487. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Francis H, et al. Small mouse cholangiocytes proliferate in response to H1 histamine receptor stimulation by activation of the IP3/CaMK I/CREB pathway. American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology. 2008;295:C499–513. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00369.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Glaser S, et al. Knockout of alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide reduces cholangiocyte proliferation in bile duct ligated mice. Laboratory Investigation. 2007;87:914–926. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tippins JR. CGRP, a novel neuropeptide from the calcitonin gene is the most potent vasodilator known. Journal of Hypertension. Supplement. 1986;4:S102–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Brain SD, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a potent vasodilator. Nature. 1985;313:54–56. doi: 10.1038/313054a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wimalawansa SJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptors, molecular genetics, physiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutic potentials. Endocrine Reviews. 1996;17:533–585. doi: 10.1210/edrv-17-5-533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.DiPette DJ, et al. Dose-dependent systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide. American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1989;297:65–70. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198902000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bang R, et al. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists protect mice from CD95- and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated apoptotic liver damage. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2004;308:1174–1180. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.059329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bang R, et al. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists CP-96,345 and L-733,060 protect mice from cytokine-mediated liver injury. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2003;305:31–39. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.043539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Neuhuber WL, Tiegs G. Innervation of immune cells, evidence for neuroimmunomodulation in the liver. Anatomical Record A. Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular and Evolutionary Biology. 2004;280:884–892. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Galtier-Dereure F, et al. Estradiol stimulates cell growth and secretion of procathepsin D and a 120-kilodalton protein in the human ovarian cancer cell line BG-1. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1992;75:1497–1502. doi: 10.1210/jcem.75.6.1464654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chalbos D, et al. Estrogens stimulate cell proliferation and induce secretory proteins in a human breast cancer cell line (T47D). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1982;55:276–283. doi: 10.1210/jcem-55-2-276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Beckmann MW, et al. Hormone replacement therapy after treatment of breast cancer, effects on postmenopausal symptoms, bone mineral density and recurrence rates. Oncology. 2001;60:199–206. doi: 10.1159/000055319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Alvaro D, et al. Estrogens stimulate proliferation of intrahepatic biliary epithelium in rats. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1681–1691. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.20184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Alvaro D, et al. Intracellular pathways mediating estrogen-induced cholangiocyte proliferation in the rat. Hepatology. 2002;36:297–304. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Alvaro D, et al. Effect of ovariectomy on the proliferative capacity of intrahepatic rat cholangiocytes. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:336–344. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Svegliati-Baroni G, et al. Estrogens maintain bile duct mass and reduce apoptosis after biliodigestive anastomosis in bile duct ligated rats. Journal of Hepatology. 2006;44:1158–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Alvaro D, et al. Estrogen receptors in cholangiocytes and the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. 2004;41:905–912. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Invernizzi P, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2004;39:1175–1176. doi: 10.1002/hep.20164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Glaser S, et al. Progesterone stimulates the proliferation of female and male cholangiocytes via autocrine/paracrine mechanisms. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2008;295:G124–136. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00536.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 85.Alvaro D, et al. The intrahepatic biliary epithelium is a target of the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor 1 axis. Journal of Hepatology. 2005;43:875–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gatto M, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 isoforms in rat hepatocytes and cholangiocytes and their involvement in protection against cholestatic injury. Laboratory Investigation. 2008;88:986–994. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.He Y, et al. Interaction of CD44 and Hyaluronic Acid Enhances Biliary Epithelial Proliferation in Cholestatic Livers. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2008;295:G305–312. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90229.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bajorath J. Molecular organization, structural features, and ligand binding characteristics of CD44, a highly variable cell surface glycoprotein with multiple functions. Proteins. 2000;39:103–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bartolazzi A, et al. Glycosylation of CD44 is implicated in CD44-mediated cell adhesion to hyaluronan. Journal of Cell Biology. 1996;132:1199–1208. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.6.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tammi MI, Day AJ, Turley EA. Hyaluronan and homeostasis, a balancing act. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:4581–4584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100037200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mikami T, et al. Significant correlations of E-cadherin, catenin, and CD44 variant form expression with carcinoma cell differentiation and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2001;116:369–376. doi: 10.1309/VV6D-3GAH-VEJM-DUJT. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Xu B, et al. High frequency of autoantibodies in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis that bind biliary epithelial cells and induce expression of CD44 and production of interleukin 6. Gut. 2002;51:120–127. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sedlaczek N, et al. Proliferating bile duct epithelial cells are a major source of connective tissue growth factor in rat biliary fibrosis. American Journal of Pathology. 2001;158:1239–1244. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64074-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Milani S, et al. Procollagen expression by nonparenchymal rat liver cells in experimental biliary fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:175–184. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91307-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Milani S, et al. Transforming growth factors beta 1 and beta 2 are differentially expressed in fibrotic liver disease. American Journal of Pathology. 1991;139:1221–1229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Milani S, et al. Cellular localization of laminin gene transcripts in normal and fibrotic human liver. American Journal of Pathology. 1989;134:1175–1182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Grappone C, et al. Expression of platelet-derived growth factor in newly formed cholangiocytes during experimental biliary fibrosis in rats. Journal of Hepatology. 1999;31:100–109. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80169-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Pinzani M, et al. Inhibition by pentoxifylline of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation by platelet-derived growth factor in hepatic stellate cells. British Journal of Pharmacology. 1996;119:1117–1124. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16012.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cho JJ, et al. An oral endothelin-A receptor antagonist blocks collagen synthesis and deposition in advanced rat liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:1169–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lowes KN, et al. Oval cell numbers in human chronic liver diseases are directly related to disease severity. American Journal of Pathology. 1999;154:537–541. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65299-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Davies SE, et al. Hepatic histological findings after transplantation for chronic hepatitis B virus infection, including a unique pattern of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Hepatology. 1991;13:150–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ray MB, et al. Bile duct changes in alcoholic liver disease. The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. Liver. 1993;13:36–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1993.tb00603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Clouston AD, et al. Fibrosis correlates with a ductular reaction in hepatitis C, roles of impaired replication, progenitor cells and steatosis. Hepatology. 2005;41:809–818. doi: 10.1002/hep.20650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Richardson MM, et al. Progressive fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, association with altered regeneration and a ductular reaction. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:80–90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Roskams T, Desmet V. Ductular reaction and its diagnostic significance. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology. 1998;15:259–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Robertson H, et al. Chronic renal allograft dysfunction, the role of T cell-mediated tubular epithelial to mesenchymal cell transition. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2004;15:390–397. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000108521.39082.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Burns WC, Kantharidis P, Thomas MC. The role of tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition in progressive kidney disease. Cells Tissues Organs. 2007;185:222–231. doi: 10.1159/000101323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Diaz R, et al. Evidence for the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in biliary atresia fibrosis. Human Pathology. 2008;39:102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Robertson H, et al. Biliary epithelial-mesenchymal transition in posttransplantation recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45:977–981. doi: 10.1002/hep.21624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sicklick JK, et al. Evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in adult liver cells. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2006;291:G575–583. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00102.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Rygiel KA, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition contributes to portal tract fibrogenesis during human chronic liver disease. Laboratory Investigation. 2008;88:112–123. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Omenetti A, et al. Hedgehog-mediated mesenchymal-epithelial interactions modulate hepatic response to bile duct ligation. Laboratory Investigation. 2007;87:499–514. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kinnman N, et al. The myofibroblastic conversion of peribiliary fibrogenic cells distinct from hepatic stellate cells is stimulated by platelet-derived growth factor during liver fibrogenesis. Laboratory Investigation. 2003;83:163–173. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000054178.01162.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kinnman N, et al. Hepatic stellate cell proliferation is an early platelet-derived growth factor-mediated cellular event in rat cholestatic liver injury. Laboratory Investigation. 2001;81:1709–1716. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Luo BH, Springer TA. Integrin structures and conformational signaling. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2006;18:579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Patsenker E, et al. Inhibition of integrin alphavbeta6 on cholangiocytes blocks transforming growth factor-beta activation and retards biliary fibrosis progression. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:660–670. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Popov Y, et al. Integrin alphavbeta6 is a marker of the progression of biliary and portal liver fibrosis and a novel target for antifibrotic therapies. Journal of Hepatology. 2008;48:453–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Marra F, et al. Thiazolidinedione treatment inhibits bile duct proliferation and fibrosis in a rat model of chronic cholestasis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005;11:4931–4938. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i32.4931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Yoshiji H, et al. Angiotensin-II and vascular endothelial growth factor interaction plays an important role in rat liver fibrosis development. Hepatology Research. 2006;36:124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.hepres.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Yasuda M, et al. Suppressive effects of estradiol on dimethylnitrosamine-induced fibrosis of the liver in rats. Hepatology. 1999;29:719–727. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Rasi G, et al. Nerve growth factor involvement in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2007;13:4986–4995. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i37.4986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Li T, et al. Effects of 5-hydroxytamine and its antagonists on hepatic stellate cells. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International. 2006;5:96–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ruddell RG, et al. A role for serotonin (5-HT) in hepatic stellate cell function and liver fibrosis. American Journal of Pathology. 2006;169:861–876. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Marzioni M, et al. Taurocholate prevents the loss of intrahepatic bile ducts due to vagotomy in bile duct-ligated rats. American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2003;284:G837–852. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00398.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Oben JA, et al. Hepatic fibrogenesis requires sympathetic neurotransmitters. Gut. 2004;53:438–445. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.026658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Umezu K, Yuasa S, Sudoh A. Change of hepatic histamine content during hepatic fibrosis. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1985;34:2007–2011. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(85)90323-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Schiavon LL, et al. Serum levels of YKL-40 and hyaluronic acid as noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis in haemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. 2008;15:666–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



