Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2009 Apr 1;587(Pt 7):1385–1386. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.170621

Calcium-activated potassium current: a novel ion channel candidate in atrial fibrillation

Stanley Nattel 1
PMCID: PMC2678214  PMID: 19336611

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia, and an important contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (Kannel & Benjamin, 2008). Currently available therapeutic options for AF are limited, and there is hope that rapidly developing knowledge about the pathophysiology of AF will lead to newer and better treatment possibilities targeting underlying mechanisms (Nattel, 2002).

A wide variety of mechanistic paradigms have been postulated for AF, with evidence for involvement of both ectopic impulse formation and atrial re-entry (Nattel, 2002). Abnormalities in atrial K+ channel function have been implicated in AF on the basis of both experimental models and genetic evidence (Andalib et al. 2008; Michael et al. 2009). In a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, Li et al. (2009) provide the first direct evidence implicating the Ca2+-activated K+ channel (Ca/K channel) in atrial repolarization and AF.

How do K+ channel abnormalities lead to AF?

The most accepted mechanism by which K+ channel abnormalities lead to AF is via increased function and acceleration of repolarisation. Since K+ is at a higher concentration inside the cell than outside, K+ channel opening causes positively charged potassium ions to move down their concentration gradient (i.e. to leave the cell), with the positive-ion egress bringing the cell back to its resting potential faster after depolarisation. Thus, the cell repolarises faster after firing, abbreviating the cardiac action potential and decreasing the cellular refractory period. Decreased refractory periods allow cardiac impulses to re-enter more easily and cause arrhythmias like AF (Nattel, 2002).

Surprisingly, loss of K+ channel function may also promote AF. The first evidence came from animal models (Satoh & Zipes, 1998) and then a single nucleotide polymorphism associated with clinical AF was shown to reduce K+ current by impairing K+ channel cell-membrane trafficking (Ehrlich et al. 2005). Reduced K+ current delays repolarisation by decreasing the K+ egress that is responsible for terminating the action potential. Reduced K+ current can lead to AF by causing early afterdepolarisations (EADs), such as those well-recognised to cause ventricular Torsades de Pointes arrhythmias in long-QT syndrome (Michael et al. 2009). Indeed, recent work shows increased AF risk in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome (Johnson et al. 2008). EADs cause ectopic beats that can initiate AF in a re-entry substrate or, if repetitive and rapid, sustain AF. Reduced K+ current could also promote AF via increases in the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of refractoriness that promote re-entry (Ehrlich et al. 2005).

The determination of AF-promoting ionic mechanisms in man is difficult because of limited access to human tissue samples. However, AF-promoting genetic abnormalities are instructive because they indicate specific ion channel abnormalities associated with arrhythmia. To date, gain-of-function K+ channel mutations are much more commonly associated with familial AF than loss-of-function, but there are also some AF-related loss-of-function K+ channelopathies (Andalib et al. 2008).

Ca2+-activated K+ channels, atrial repolarisation and AF

A variety of Ca/K channels play a crucial role in vascular physiology (Ledoux et al. 2006). Ca2+ entry via Ca2+ channels causes contractile-filament movement in vascular smooth muscle cells, increasing vascular tone. Unopposed, Ca2+ entry could cause excessive vasoconstriction. Ca/K channels, which open in response to the same Ca2+ entry that causes vasoconstriction, induce cellular hyperpolarisation that reduces Ca2+ channel activation, promotes vasodilatation and limits Ca2+-dependent vasoconstriction (Ledoux et al. 2006). Ca/K channels are divided into three classes based on their single channel conductance: small (‘SK’)-, intermediate (‘IK’)- and big (‘BK’)-conductance channels. In the 1970s, there were a number of suggestions for a role of Ca/K channels in the heart, but subsequent evidence called this idea into question (Eisner & Vaughan-Jones, 1983).

Until the late 1990s, no convincing evidence for cardiac Ca/K channels was presented. In 1999, Wang et al. detected Ca/K currents and SK3 subunits in the H9c2 cell-line derived from rat ventricles (Wang et al. 1999). In 2003, Xu et al. described substantial Ca2+-activated K+-current in mouse cardiomyocytes and biochemical evidence for the presence and atrial-selective distribution of SK2 channels in human and mouse hearts (Xu et al. 2003). Tuteja et al. subsequently detected all three small-conductance Ca/K channel subunits (SK1–3) in mouse hearts, with SK1 and SK2 having an atrial-selective distribution (Tuteja et al. 2005).

The first connection between Ca/K channels and AF was presented by Ozgen et al. who observed that intermittent burst pacing of pulmonary vein (PV) cardiomyocyte-sleeves (to mimic PV tachycardias implicated in AF) causes progressive PV action-potential shortening due to increased Ca2+-activated K+ current and increased membrane trafficking of SK2 (Ozgen et al. 2007). However, the Ozgen study offered only circumstantial evidence for a potential role of Ca/K channels in AF. Now Li et al. (2009) have provided direct evidence. In an elegant series of experiments, they showed that mice engineered to lack SK2 have prolonged atrial action potentials, show inducible AF upon programmed stimulation, and demonstrate atrial EADs under appropriate conditions.

Taken together, the Li and Ozgen articles point clearly to a role of Ca/K channels in AF. On the other hand, their observations raise some questions. The Ozgen study implicates increased SK2 function in AF, but the Li study shows that loss of SK2 function promotes AF induction in the mouse. This apparent discrepancy may not be significant, however, because both enhancement and suppression of repolarisation can produce arrhythmogenesis (Michael et al. 2009) and both have been implicated in clinical AF (Andalib et al. 2008). The Li et al. study used mice with a generalized SK2 knockout (Li et al. 2009). Thus, indirect mechanisms for the AF diathesis (e.g. loss of vascular SK2 causing hypertension and secondary cardiac manifestations) are not excluded. Finally, AF predisposition was demonstrated with premature extrastimulation protocols, which are much less effective in precipitating EAD arrhythmias (as postulated by Li et al.) than re-entry, which should have been made less likely by APD prolongation. These issues notwithstanding, the Li and Ozgen studies do suggest potentially important roles of Ca/K channels, long thought to be insignificant in the heart, in atrial repolarization and AF.

Potential clinical applications

AF remains an arrhythmia of great clinical importance with suboptimal therapeutic options. The cumulative evidence for atrial-selective expression of Ca/K channel SK1 and SK2 isoforms from the Chiamvimonvat laboratory (Xu et al. 2003; Tuteja et al. 2005; Li et al. 2009) raises the possibility that drugs targeting such channels may prevent AF without ventricular proarrhythmic risk. There is hope that better mechanistic understanding may lead to improved AF therapy (Nattel 2002), and evidence for a role of Ca/K channels should lead to additional research that may provide new pathophysiologically relevant insights. Finally, the knowledge that Ca/K channels may contribute to cardiac disease should direct broader study into the role of such channels in determining heart disease risk and as possible targets for preventive therapy. New insights gained by studies like those of Li et al. can only help to improve our understanding of AF pathophysiology, prevention and management.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 44365), the Quebec Heart Foundation, the Fondation Leducq (European-North American Atrial Fibrillation Research Alliance, ENAFRA) and the Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems (MITACS) Network of Centers of Excellence.

References

  1. Andalib A, Brugada R, Nattel S. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23:176–183. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3282fa7142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ehrlich JR, Zicha S, Coutu P, Hébert TE, Nattel S. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;67:520–528. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisner DA, Vaughan-Jones RD. Cell Calcium. 1983;4:371–386. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(83)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson JN, Tester DJ, Perry J, Salisbury BA, Reed CR, Ackerman MJ. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:704–709. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kannel WB, Benjamin EJ. Med Clin North Am. 2008;92:17–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2007.09.002. ix. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ledoux J, Werner ME, Brayden JE, Nelson MT. Physiology (Bethesda) 2006;21:69–78. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00040.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li N, Timofeyev V, Tuteja D, Xu D, Lu L, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Singapuri A, Albert T, Rajagopal A, Bond CT, Periasamy M, Adelman JP, Chiamvimonvat N. J Physiol. 2009;587:1087–1100. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.167718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Michael G, Xiao L, Qi XY, Dobrev D, Nattel S. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;81:491–499. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nattel S. Nature. 2002;415:219–226. doi: 10.1038/415219a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ozgen N, Dun W, Sosunov EA, Anyukhovsky EP, Hirose M, Duffy HS, Boyden PA, Rosen MR. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;75:758–769. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Satoh T, Zipes DP. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:970–975. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tuteja D, Xu D, Timofeyev V, Lu L, Sharma D, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Nie L, Vázquez AE, Young JN, Glatter KA, Chiamvimonvat N. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H2714–2723. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00534.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang W, Watanabe M, Nakamura T, Kudo Y, Ochi R. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1999;276:H1559–1566. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.5.H1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu Y, Tuteja D, Zhang Z, Xu D, Zhang Y, Rodriguez J, Nie L, Tuxson HR, Young JN, Glatter KA, Vázquez AE, Yamoah EN, Chiamvimonvat N. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:49085–49094. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307508200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES