Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2008 Nov 8;134(1):26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.019

Controlled delivery of VEGF via modulation of alginate microparticle ionic crosslinking

Steven M Jay 1, W Mark Saltzman 1,*
PMCID: PMC2678414  NIHMSID: NIHMS107287  PMID: 19027807

Abstract

Clinical application of therapeutic angiogenesis is hampered by a lack of viable systems that demonstrate controlled, sustained release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Alginate has emerged as a popular material for VEGF delivery; however most alginate-based systems offer limited means to control the rate of VEGF release beyond reducing the VEGF:alginate ratio to suboptimal efficiency. This study describes methods to control the release of VEGF from small (<10 μm mean diameter) alginate microparticles via the use of different ionic crosslinkers. Crosslinking with Zn2+ versus Ca2+ reduced VEGF diffusional release and the combination of discrete populations of either Zn2+- or Ca2+-crosslinked particles allowed for control over the sustained release profiles for VEGF. The particle preparations were non-toxic and VEGF was bioactive after release. These results demonstrate that ionic modulation of alginate crosslinking is a viable strategy for controlling release of VEGF while retaining the high protein:polymer ratio that makes alginate an attractive carrier for delivery of protein therapeutics.

Keywords: VEGF, Protein drug delivery, Therapeutic angiogenesis, Controlled release, Microparticles

1. Introduction

Peripheral vascular disease, resulting from atherosclerosis, is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide through induction of critical limb ischemia (CLI) [1,2]. Therapeutic revascularization via delivery of angiogenic proteins, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been identified as a key strategy for treatment of CLI in numerous animal models and small clinical studies [36]. VEGF is a ~45 kDa angiogenic protein that plays a critical role in both physiologic and pathologic vascular development [7]. Its use as a potential treatment for peripheral and myocardial vascular disease is well established [8], but clinical trials investigating the effect of bolus injections of VEGF have largely failed to show efficacy [9,10], likely because IV administration of VEGF is limited by its short in vivo half life (~30 min) and overall dose is limited by off-target site toxicity issues [11,12]. Interestingly, recent data indicates that VEGF mono-therapy can be a successful means of angiogenic induction, but that control over delivery rate and total dose are essential for production of normally functioning vascular networks [13]. Unfortunately, despite numerous studies that have examined sustained release approaches [3,5,1425], delivery of VEGF at a high VEGF:vehicle ratio, such that therapeutic concentrations of VEGF can be achieved from non-toxic levels of delivery vehicle, is difficult to realize. However, one vehicle that has demonstrated the capacity to overcome this limitation is alginate [1517].

Alginate, a linear copolymer derived from various species of kelp, is able to be crosslinked in an aqueous environment and has been shown to increase VEGF stability and bioactivity [17,26]. In previous studies, VEGF has been delivered from macroscopic alginate gels or microbeads, the latter with diameters ranging from hundreds of microns to a millimeter or greater. We recently reported on the effectiveness of much smaller particles, with an average diameter of ~10 μm, that were crosslinked by CaCl2 and ZnCl2 [27]; these particles provide sustained VEGF delivery and in vivo efficacy in association with endothelial cell transplantation for treatment of ischemia. The present study builds on these observations by examining the relationship of controlled VEGF release from small alginate microparticles to the crosslinking ion used.

Crosslinking of alginate occurs when its constituent monomers, mannuronic acid (M) and guluronic acid (G), are formed into poly-M, poly-G, and alternating MG blocks in the presence of any of numerous divalent or trivalent cations [28]. Ca2+ is, by far, the most widely used crosslinking ion; Ca2+-crosslinked alginate is considered to be clinically safe [29]. Sr2+- and Ba2+-salts are also commonly considered to have low toxicity [28], and have been examined as crosslinkers for alginate microbeads and gels [30]. Zn2+ is also capable of crosslinking alginate, but is poorly suited as a crosslinking ion for pancreatic islet encapsulation, a common application for large alginate microbeads, due to sensitivity of beta cells to zinc [31]. Therefore, Zn2+ has scarcely been investigated as a crosslinker for alginate in protein delivery applications. However, zinc is capable of crosslinking alginate less specifically than other ions [32], forming GG, MG, and MM linkages whereas Ca2+ and Sr2+ form predominantly GG linkages and Ba2+ is incapable of linking M and G blocks together [30].

We hypothesized that the use of zinc, via increased crosslinking, could produce a drastically different VEGF release profile than those of particles crosslinked with other ions [33,34], especially when paired with an alginate possessing a high percentage of MG and MM blocks. Alginate derived from Macrocystis pyrifera is composed of a relatively high proportion of MM and MG blocks (84% combined), and so it was chosen for this study instead of other commercially available alginates with high-M content derived from Laminaria hyperborea (leaf) (74%) and Laminaria digitata (75%) [35]. The objective of this report was to examine the effect of crosslinking small alginate microparticles with Ba2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, and Zn2+, and combinations thereof, on release of VEGF and particle cytotoxicity. We further hypothesized that combining populations of particles with different release profiles would provide a means of controllable, sustained VEGF release that is typically not possible with alginate microparticle systems.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Alginate from M. pyrifera (viscosity of ~250 cps (2% solution at 25 °C), ~50 kDa) was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and subsequently purified of endotoxins based on the procedure of Klock et al.[36], with confirmation using an LAL QCL-1000 kit (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA). VEGF-A165 (VEGF) was a generous gift of the National Cancer Institute and received lyophilized 1:50 with bovine serum albumin (ultrapure, >98% albumin). Human VEGF DuoSet enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). EGM-2 medium was procured from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA). Cytodex 3 microcarriers were acquired from GE Healthcare (Chalfont St. Giles, UK). Fibrinogen, aprotinin, thrombin, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) and MTT reagent were all purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were a generous gift of Dr. Jordan Pober (Yale University).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Preparation of alginate microparticles

Alginate microparticles were prepared essentially as previously described [27] using an emulsification technique based on the method of Zheng et al. [37], with several modifications. Alginate and HPMC were co-dissolved in ultrapure H2O to a final concentration of slightly greater than 20 mg/ml (9:1 alginate:HPMC). BSA:VEGF (50:1) was then dissolved at 1 mg/ml (20 μg VEGF/ml) and added to the alginate solution at a volume to make the final alginate:HPMC concentration 20 mg/ml. The resulting solution was subsequently added dropwise to iso-octane+5% (v/v) Span 80 while homogenizing at 17,500 rpm. 30% (v/v) aqueous Tween 80 was then added dropwise to the emulsion, resulting in an acceptable HLB value. The emulsion was mixed for 3 min, followed by the dropwise addition of an ionic crosslinking solution at total concentrations ranging from 90 mM to 700 mM. After a further 3 min of mixing, 2-propanol was added and the particles were allowed to cure for 3 min. Particles were then centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 1 min, the supernatant was removed and particles were subsequently washed 2× for 8 min in 2-propanol. The particles were then air-dried, resuspended in ultrapure H2O, and lyophilized. Based on preliminary data, Zn2+ crosslinked particles were then soaked in M199 medium for 2 h at 4 °C, the medium was filtered and the particles were lyophilized again overnight. Particles were stored at −20 °C until use.

2.2.2. Microparticle characterization

Microparticle morphology was evaluated via brightfield (Olympus IX71) and scanning electron microscopy (EM) (Philips XL series ESEM). For EM, samples were mounted to aluminum stubs with double-sided carbon tape and sputter-coated (Cressington Sputtercoater 108auto) with gold prior to viewing. Particle size was determined in aqueous solution using a Beckman Coulter Multisizer 3. Encapsulation efficiency was determined via an extraction method. Particles were incubated at 1 mg/ml in PBS at 37 °C under intense agitation for 12 h. Protein was extracted into the aqueous supernatant via centrifugation and quantified using a BCA assay. The extraction procedure was performed a total of 3× for each particle type.

2.2.3. VEGF release

VEGF release profiles were obtained by incubating particles at 3 mg/ml in 24 well plates at 37 °C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere in triplicate. Particles were pooled from 3 different batches and plates were constantly agitated using an undulating platform. All VEGF concentrations were determined by ELISA and the release medium was 20%FBS-M199, with l-glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin supplements (complete M199).

To investigate the effect of crosslinking ion and concentration on the mechanism of VEGF release from small alginate microparticles, a semi-empirical model, known as the power law [38], was used:

Mt/M=ktn (1)

where Mt is the mass of drug released at a time t, M is the total mass of released drug, k is a constant incorporating morphologic characteristics of the delivery system, and n is the release exponent, provided that t is limited to times where Mt/M< 0.6. This model has been shown to correlate well for release of an agent from swellable hydrogels. For spherical release systems, an n value of 0.43 is indicative of a Fickian diffusion mechanism, a value between 0.43 and 0.85 indicates anomalous transport controlled by both diffusion and swelling, a value of 0.85 represents case-II transport (swelling controlled drug release), and values >0.85 indicate super case-II transport [39].

2.2.4. Particle cytotoxicity

HUVEC were routinely grown in complete M199 medium with endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS). HUVEC before passage 6 were used for all experiments. Particle cytotoxicity to HUVEC was evaluated via direct addition of particles to cells in culture. HUVEC were seeded into gelatin-coated 96-well plates at 10,000 cells/well in EGM-2 and allowed to adhere overnight. Medium was then aspirated and immediately replaced with fresh EGM-2 containing the desired concentration of microparticles and allowed to incubate for 48 h without changing medium before determination of cell survival by the MTT assay.

2.2.5. VEGF bioactivity

VEGF bioactivity was determined by a sprouting assay. Sprouts of HUVEC from microcarriers in fibrin clots following exposure to released VEGF from each particle type were counted following clot fixation overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde. Microparticles were incubated in EGM-2 without growth factors for a continuous period of 1, 5, 10, or 15 days. VEGF values were measured by ELISA and subsequently HUVEC were cultured on Cytodex 3 microcarriers overnight and suspended within fibrin clots in 24-well plates with EGM-2 with growth factors, but without VEGF, as previously reported [40]. Release supernatant was then added to wells to make an equivalent final VEGF concentration of 10 ng/ml. Native, non-encapsulated VEGF at 10 ng/ml was used as the 100% bioactivity benchmark, and wells with medium only (no VEGF) were employed as the negative control. An average of 106 microcarriers was evaluated per condition.

2.2.6. Data presentation and statistical analyses

Unless indicated, data are represented as mean±standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was determined using a student’s T-test with a 95% confidence interval, unless otherwise noted. Statistical calculations, non-linear curve fits, EC50 determinations and linear regressions were performed using a GraphPad Prism software.

3. Results

3.1. Particle morphology and VEGF encapsulation efficiency

Alginate microparticles crosslinked by CaCl2, ZnCl2, and SrCl2 exhibited spherical morphology in aqueous solution and swelled when placed in aqueous medium (Fig. 1a–f).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Morphology of small alginate microparticles. Scanning electron micrographs (a,c,e,g) and brightfield microscopy images (b,d,f,h) of alginate microparticles crosslinked by 700 mM CaCl2 (a,b), 700 mM ZnCl2 (c,d), 700 mM SrCl2 (e,f), and 700 mM BaCl2 (g,h). Scale bar=50 μm.

Particles crosslinked with BaCl2 also swelled in suspension, but appeared less spherical in nature (Fig. 1g–h). Swelling for all particle types occurred rapidly, and was essentially complete within 20 min of suspension in release medium (data not shown). Furthermore, particle diameters for all crosslinkers after 20 min in suspension were found to be statistically similar to those for the same particle populations after 2 weeks incubation, including seven changes of release medium, indicating high morphological stability for all formulations examined (not shown). CaCl2-crosslinked particles had statistically larger diameters than those crosslinked by other ions (Fig. 2a), but the values are too close to be practically considered different. No practical dependence of particle diameter on concentration of either ZnCl2 or CaCl2 was detected (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of crosslinking ion on microparticle size and encapsulation efficiency. Mean particle diameter was relatively unaffected by species of crosslinking ion (a), although Ca2+-crosslinked particles displayed statistically larger average diameters. Particle diameter was also essentially unchanged by variation of Ca2+ (squares) and Zn2+ (triangles) concentration (b). Species of crosslinking ion did have a significant effect on VEGF encapsulation efficiency (black bars, left y-axis) and total VEGF release (gray bars, right y-axis) (c). Like particle diameter, encapsulation efficiency was not affected by variation of Ca2+ (squares) and Zn2+ (triangles) crosslinker concentration. All data represents particles crosslinked by Cl salts at 700 mM unless otherwise noted, ***P<0.001, ^data is statistically significant from all other comparable data sets (P<0.01).

CaCl2- and SrCl2-crosslinked particles entrapped VEGF most effectively, while ZnCl2-crosslinked particles had substantially lower encapsulation efficiency than other formulations (Fig. 2c). However, ZnCl2-crosslinked particles released ~100% of their payload, while release from all other particles measured was significantly less (Fig. 2c). BaCl2-crosslinked particles displayed the poorest VEGF encapsulation, further indicating the potential unsuitability of Ba2+ as a crosslinking ion in this application. VEGF encapsulation efficiency was not significantly affected by crosslinking ion concentration for Ca2+ and Zn2+ (Fig. 2d).

3.2. Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxicity of alginate microparticles was evaluated in vitro by direct addition to HUVEC. Initially, ZnCl2-crosslinked particles were prepared without a post-emulsification wash step, as described in Methods. These unwashed particles (EC50 =795 μg/ml), as well as BaCl2-crosslinked particles (EC50 =78 μg/ml), significantly reduced HUVEC viability, even at low concentrations (Fig. 3a). By comparison, SrCl2-crosslinked particles were better tolerated at low concentrations, although the calculated EC50 of 817 μg/ml was not significantly greater than the EC50 value obtained for unwashed ZnCl2-crosslinked particles. CaCl2-crosslinked particles caused little reduction in cell viability until supersaturating particle concentrations were employed (EC50 =3091 μ/ml) (Fig. 3a). We hypothesized that Zn2+-induced cytotoxicity might be the result of a burst release of Zn2+ into the medium, as large, rapid increases in Zn2+ concentration can result in detrimental effects to cells and tissues [41]. Addition of a brief washing step resulted in a marked reduction in 700 mM ZnCl2-crosslinked particle-induced cytotoxicity (EC50 =1230 μg/ml) (Fig. 3b). A similar reduction in toxicity was seen when using particles crosslinked with a 90 mM ZnCl2 solution (EC50 =1843 μg/ml) (Fig. 3b). Also, the counter ion present in the Zn2+ salt used for crosslinking had an effect on cytotoxicity, with SO42 producing a lower toxicity at higher concentrations (EC50 =2234 μg/ml) while use of acetate proved to be significantly more toxic (EC50 =329 μg/ml) (Fig. 3c). The wash step resulted in less than a 30 ng VEGF/mg particle loss (or 3% of the theoretical maximum loading), as measured by ELISA. When an identical washing procedure was applied to all other particle populations, significantly higher VEGF losses were recorded, and so this wash step was limited to Zn-crosslinked particles. Finally, we also observed an increase in cell viability relative to control at low ZnCl2 concentrations; this was likely due to the anti-apoptotic effect of Zn2+ ions on endothelial cells [42].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Alginate microparticle cytotoxicity to HUVEC in vitro. The effect of alginate microparticles on HUVEC viability is dependant on crosslinker ion species (a). Washing the burst of Zn2+ ions from 700 mM ZnCl2-crosslinked particles significantly reduces particle cytotoxicity in a similar way to reducing the overall concentration of ZnCl2 during particle formulation (b). The counter ion present in the Zn2+ salt used for crosslinking has an effect on particle cytotoxicity (c). #Difference in cytotoxicity profile for CaCl2 was statistically significant compared to that of ZnCl2 (P <0.05) and BaCl2 (P <0.01), *Profiles for 700 mM ZnCl2 post-wash and 90 mM ZnCl2 were statistically different from 700 mM ZnCl2 pre-wash (P <0.05), as computed by a Bonferroni post-hoc test.

3.3. Release of VEGF

Choice of crosslinking ion had a substantial impact on the VEGF release profile from alginate microparticles in vitro. VEGF release from BaCl2- and SrCl2-crosslinked particles followed a similar pattern, with a dramatic burst release and greater mass released corresponding to a lower crosslinker concentration (Fig. 4a,b). Release of VEGF from CaCl2- and ZnCl2-crosslinked particles exhibited a different trend, with a higher mass release facilitated by copious amounts of crosslinking ion (Fig. 4c,d). Furthermore, ZnCl2-crosslinked particles displayed a significantly prolonged release of VEGF compared to particles formed with other ions. This profile of extended VEGF release was retained when another Zn2+ salt, zinc acetate, was used as the crosslinking ion (Fig. 4e), but not for ZnSO4 (Fig. 4f), suggesting that ionic dissociation in solution plays a role in the availability of divalent cations for crosslinking in alginate-containing emulsions.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Choice of crosslinking ion species alters VEGF release from alginate microparticles. In vitro release profiles of VEGF from small alginate microparticles crosslinked by BaCl2 (a), SrCl2 (b), CaCl2 (c), ZnCl2 (d), Zn(O2CCH3)2 (e), and ZnSO4 (f) at the indicated concentrations.

The effect of crosslinker modulation on the release mechanism of VEGF from small alginate microparticles was investigated using the power law expression (Eq. (1)). Based on this model, release of VEGF from 700 mM CaCl2-crosslinked particles was anomalous (Fig. 5a,c), suggesting that both diffusion and particle swelling are important in determining rate of release. For ZnCl2-crosslinked particles, the same analysis indicated a super class-II transport mechanism (Fig. 5b,c). It should be noted that alginate release systems are known to often exhibit a lag phase of release at very early time points [33]. In the case of ZnCl2-crosslinked particles in this study, the lag phase appears to be not only present, but extended significantly compared to that of CaCl2-crosslinked particles. Particles crosslinked by BaCl2 and SrCl2, as well as by lower concentrations of CaCl2, exhibited an extreme burst release of VEGF within the first several hours of incubation in the release medium, and so were excluded from this analysis.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Release mechanism of particles crosslinked by Zn2+ and Ca2+. Release data for 700 mM CaCl2-crosslinked (a) and 700 mM (closed squares), 350 mM (circles), 175 mM (open squares), and 90 mM (diamonds) Zn2+-crosslinked (b) particles were fit to the power law model for drug release, data summarized in (c) (values for n expressed as mean±95% confidence interval value).

3.4. Controlled release of bioactive VEGF

Given the nature of the VEGF release profiles for ZnCl2- and CaCl2-crosslinked particles, we hypothesized that combining populations of particles crosslinked by each of these ions could yield a method for controlling VEGF release from alginate. By combining particles at various ratios, we observed that release of VEGF depended on ZnCl2: CaCl2-crosslinked particle ratio (Fig. 6a). Combining both ZnCl2 and CaCl2 into the same crosslinking solution, at various concentration ratios, did not have the same effect (Fig. 6b). The cytotoxicity of a 1:1 ZnCl2/CaCl2 particle population was found to be nearly identical to that of a pure population of CaCl2-crosslinked particles (EC50 = 3967 μg/ml) (Fig. 6c), which have the most favorable biocompatibility characteristics of all alginate particles studied. Finally, we examined the bioactivity of VEGF encapsulated in particles crosslinked by ZnCl2 and CaCl2, as well as mixed populations of such particles, using a HUVEC sprouting assay. Between formulations, no significant differences in bioactivity were observed out to 15 days post-encapsulation (Fig. 6d). Furthermore, in this in vitro assay, encapsulated VEGF bioactivity was not significantly different from that of native VEGF (positive control) for up to 10d for all formulations.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Mixed populations of particles crosslinked by Zn2+ and Ca2+. Mixing particles formed by crosslinking with 700 mM ZnCl2 and 700 mM CaCl2 at various ratios results in intermediate release profiles of VEGF (a). Combining Zn2+ and Ca2+ ions into the same crosslinking solution results lower overall VEGF release dominated by Zn2+ crosslinking (b). A 1:1 mixture of 700 mM ZnCl2- and 700 mM CaCl2-crosslinked particles displays a cytotoxicity profile similar to the of particles crosslinked by 700 mM CaCl2 alone (c). Bioactivity of encapsulated VEGF is not significantly affected by choice of crosslinking ion species or combination of particles crosslinked by different species (d). For all formulations, VEGF bioactivity remains high relative to native VEGF for at least 2 weeks (positive control, top dashed line; bottom dashed line indicates negative control (no VEGF in media)).

4. Discussion

Alginate is an effective means for encapsulation and delivery of bioactive VEGF; however, in prior reports, control over rate and duration of delivery was limited. Aside from modification of protein loading or alginate concentration, a number of methods have been proposed for modification of protein release from alginate micro-particles. Most notably, addition of a polycation layer or other coating as an additional diffusion barrier has been applied in a number of studies [4346]. However, polycations are typically toxic [47] and can exacerbate the foreign body response to implanted alginate beads [48]. Our results support an alternative method for control of VEGF release: ionic modulation of alginate crosslinking allows control of release from small alginate microparticles without imparting toxicity.

Particle size was largely unaffected by the crosslinking ion used in particle formulation (Fig. 2a). Likewise, particle morphology was similar for all formulations except for those particles crosslinked with BaCl2 (Fig. 1g,h). Ba2+ has been used in the crosslinking of large alginate beads for cell encapsulation [4951]; it can induce formation of more stable capsules than those crosslinked by Ca2+ for certain alginate compositions [30,52]. However, Ba2+ was determined to be an undesirable crosslinking ion for this application due to the low encapsulation efficiency (Fig. 2c) and poor sustained release characteristics of BaCl2-crosslinked particles (Fig. 4a). This result is likely due to the alginate selected for this study; Ba2+ has been reported to have low affinity to alginate from M. pyrifera [53] based on its relative dearth of GG blocks (16%). As previously noted, alginate from M. pyrifera was selected for this study based on the likelihood of improved crosslinking with Zn2+. Additionally, preliminary data indicated a lack of sustained VEGF release from Ca2+-, Sr2+-, and Ba2+-crosslinked alginate derived from L. hyperborea (stem) (57% GG Blocks) (FMC Biopolymer, data not shown).

Surprisingly, Sr2+-crosslinked particles were spherical and retained their morphological stability over the duration of VEGF release (not shown). Sr2+ is also thought to be incapable of forming MG linkages [30], instead forming only GG crosslinks. We believe that it forms less stable particles with the alginate used in this study due to the low GG block content of alginate from M. pyrifera (~18%) [35]. Sr2+-crosslinked particles also show poor sustained release of VEGF (Fig. 4b), but VEGF encapsulation efficiency in Sr2+-crosslinked particles was much higher than that of particles crosslinked by Ba2+ (Fig. 2c), indicating less competition between Sr2+ ions and VEGF for alginate binding sites. The competitive nature of crosslinking ion and VEGF for alginate binding sites is confirmed by the trend of increasing total VEGF release with decreased ion concentration for both Sr2+ and Ba2+ (Fig. 4a,b). Overall, these data indicate that enhanced MM or MG linkage formation leads to decreased VEGF entrapment, and therefore that the electrostatically-based affinity interaction between VEGF and alginate is mediated predominantly by M-containing blocks in this system.

VEGF release after crosslinking with Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions revealed a different trend with ion concentration. While VEGF release decreased with increasing ion concentration at lower overall concentrations for both Zn2+ and Ca2+, as was also seen with Sr2+ and Ba2+, this trend was broken when particles were crosslinked by either 700 mM CaCl2 or 700 mM ZnCl2 (Fig. 4c,d). Notably, at 700 mM, Ca2+- and Zn2+-crosslinked particles released a significantly higher percentage of their payloads than did Ba2+- and Sr2+-crosslinked particles (Fig. 2c), indicative of a charge-shielding effect [54]. This leads to more complete crosslinking with these two ions, especially Zn2+, as ZnCl2-crosslinked particles released nearly all of their payloads. Interestingly, the concentrations required to overcome the trend of increasing ion concentration leading to reduced VEGF encapsulation in this emulsification system are much higher than the crosslinking ion concentrations used for more traditional gelation of alginate microbeads in aqueous media [30]. This is likely due to the varying exposure times to ionic solution between conventional external gelation and external gelation during emulsification. Crosslinking with a 700 mM solution, which brings the overall aqueous ionic concentration to ~350 mM, may be necessary to instantaneously saturate the available crosslinking sites during emulsification. The concentration ranges used in this study were based on preliminary experiments that showed lower concentrations did not reproducibly induce stable alginate gelation while higher concentrations tended to induce increased cytotoxic effects.

A key difference between VEGF release from alginate crosslinked with Zn2+ and Ca2+ was revealed when the power law model was fit to release data (Fig. 5). Values of the release exponent for 700 mM CaCl2-and 700 mM ZnCl2-crosslinked particles indicate a different mechanism of release between these two particle populations. However, this difference can be partially accounted for by the prolonged lag phase of release observed with ZnCl2-crosslinked particles; at later times, VEGF release from these particles appears to be governed predominately by diffusion. This lag effect has been noted before for Zn2+-crosslinked alginate [33], although it was previously attributed in part to an interaction between zinc and insulin, which was encapsulated in the earlier study. Another report noted no significant difference on the diffusion of a small molecule, acetaminophen, from alginate gels crosslinked with either Ca2+ or Zn2+ [32], but a decrease in permeability was observed to be associated with more complete crosslinking, such as that provided by Zn2+. The apparent predominance of diffusion on release from Ca2+- and Zn2+-crosslinked alginate observed for VEGF in this study is consistent with results noted by Chan et al. [34]. However, this same study also described an inability to form spherical particles with Zn2+ as the sole crosslinking ion. The results reported here might be different due to the use, in our study, of substantially lower concentrations of crosslinker, different Zn2+ counterion (Cl2 vs. SO4), alginate type (M. pyrifera vs. L. digitata), or other formulation parameters. Specifically, we observed that at higher Zn2+ concentrations (>1 M), substantial particle agglomeration occurred (data not shown). The release data for Zn2+-crosslinked particles in this study is also consistent with the findings of Pillay et al. [55], indicative that ionic crosslinker modulation to control release is not a VEGF-specific phenomenon, and may be applied more broadly for protein delivery from alginate.

We hypothesized that combining populations of particles would enable us to manipulate the VEGF release profile from small alginate microparticles. Indeed, several intermediate profiles were observed when combining different ratios of 700 mM CaCl2- and 700 mM ZnCl2-crosslinked particles (Fig. 6a), providing a degree of controlled release that is typically unobtainable for alginate-based systems, which are generally manipulated via different protein loadings or alginate concentrations. Reduction of protein loading is a problem with these systems, as high protein:polymer is a primary benefit of using this system [28]. Not surprisingly, combining CaCl2 and ZnCl2 in the same crosslinking solution at various concentration ratios did not have a similar effect (Fig. 6b). Due to the high MG and MM block content of the alginate used for this study, Zn2+ crosslinking was expected to dominate based on its affinity for these blocks. The data show that incorporating CaCl2 as a simultaneous crosslinker may prevent more extensive crosslinking by ZnCl2 by restricting matrix mobility through GG linkages, which are known to be more mechanically stiff than MM or MG linkages [30]. However, this approach to controlling VEGF delivery may still be of some use [34], as nearly linear release profiles were observed for VEGF over 7 days of release (Fig. 6b). It is notable that overall release of VEGF was significantly decreased using this type of ionic modulation.

The cytotoxicity of Zn2+-crosslinked alginate microparticles was significantly reduced by washing away the initial burst release of Zn2+ ions [41] (Fig. 3a,b). Also expectedly, Ca2+-crosslinked particles were the least cytotoxic, as Ca-alginate is generally considered to be clinically safe [28,29]. Interestingly, a 1:1 mixture of Ca2+- and Zn2+-crosslinked particles displayed nearly identical cytotoxicity to particles crosslinked by Ca2+ alone (Fig. 6c). The validity of this finding is further supported in the literature [56] and by our previous demonstration of the in vivo therapeutic utility of such particles in a preclinical model of hindlimb ischemia [27]. Furthermore, mixed populations of particles crosslinked by Zn2+ and Ca2+ had statistically similar VEGF bioactivity profiles in an in vitro sprouting assay (Fig. 6d), indicating that neither choice of crosslinking ion nor relative ratio of particle populations substantially affects VEGF bioactivity for this formulation process. More importantly, VEGF bioactivity was retained at or near levels of native VEGF for at least 15 days. These results are far superior to those seen with a different delivery vehicle, poly(lactic-co glycolic acid), in the same assay [27]. In addition, we have recently shown that a 1:1 mixture of Zn2+- and Ca2+-crosslinked particles release bioactive VEGF in vivo [27]. Taken together, these data suggest that mixing populations of particles crosslinked by Zn2+ and Ca2+ represents a viable approach for tunable, sustained release of VEGF from small alginate microparticles.

5. Conclusion

We developed new methods for the controlled, sustained release of VEGF from small alginate microparticles. Prior studies have encountered an inability to tune VEGF release from alginate-based systems; we overcame this limitation by mixing populations of particles crosslinked by different divalent cations, Zn2+ and Ca2+. The cytotoxicity and bioactivity of encapsulated VEGF in these particles was unaffected by this strategy, retaining the primary advantage of small alginate microparticles for VEGF delivery, namely the high VEGF:vehicle ratio needed for many clinical applications.

Acknowledgments

We thank Renee Wade and Andrew Shenoy for assistance with the data collection and Lichuan Qian for scientific discussions. The VEGF used was generously supplied by the Biological Resources Branch of the National Cancer Institute. This work was funded by NIH grant R01HL085416 (W.M.S.). The authors report no confiicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Regensteiner JG, Hiatt WR. Current medical therapies for patients with peripheral arterial disease: a critical review. Am J Med. 2002;112(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rissanen TT, Vajanto I, Yla-Herttuala S. Gene therapy for therapeutic angiogenesis in critically ischaemic lower limb – on the way to the clinic. Eur J Clin Invest. 2001;31(8):651–666. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00864.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Spatiotemporal control of vascular endothelial growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels enhances angiogenesis. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(3):590–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baumgartner I, Isner JM. Stimulation of peripheral angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Vasa. 1998;27(4):201–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hopkins SP, Bulgrin JP, Sims RL, Bowman B, Donovan DL, Schmidt SP. Controlled delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor promotes neovascularization and maintains limb function in a rabbit model of ischemia. J Vas Surg. 1998;27(5):886–895. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70269-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sun QH, Chen RR, Shen YC, Mooney DJ, Rajagopalan S, Grossman PM. Sustained vascular endothelial growth factor delivery enhances angiogenesis and perfusion in ischemic hindlimb. Pharm Res. 2005;22(7):1110–1116. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-5644-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(4):581–611. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takeshita S, Zheng LP, Brogi E, Kearney M, Pu LQ, Bunting S, Ferrara N, Symes JF, Isner JM. Therapeutic angiogenesis – a single intraarterial bolus of vascular endothelial growth-factor augments revascularization in a rabbit ischemic hind-limb model. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(2):662–670. doi: 10.1172/JCI117018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henry TD, Annex BH, McKendall GR, Azrin MA, Lopez JJ, Giordano FJ, Shah PK, Willerson JT, Benza RL, Berman DS, Gibson CM, Bajamonde A, Rundle AC, Fine J, McCluskey ER, Investigators V. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ischemia for vascular angiogenesis. Circulation. 2003;107(10):1359–1365. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000061911.47710.8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rajagopalan S, Mohler ER, III, Lederman RJ, Mendelsohn FO, Saucedo JF, Goldman CK, Blebea J, Macko J, Kessler PD, Rasmussen HS, Annex BH. Regional angiogenesis with vascular endothelial growth factor in peripheral arterial disease: a phase II randomized, double-blind, controlled study of adenoviral delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor 121 in patients with disabling intermittent claudication. Circulation. 2003;108(16):1933–1938. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093398.16124.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang R, Bunting S, Ko A, Keyt BA, Modi NB, Zioncheck TF, Ferrara N, Jin H. Substantially attenuated hemodynamic responses to Escherichia coli-derived vascular endothelial growth factor given by intravenous infusion compared with bolus injection. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;284(1):103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eppler SM, Combs DL, Henry TD, Lopez JJ, Ellis SG, Yi JH, Annex BH, McCluskey ER, Zioncheck TF. A target-mediated model to describe the pharmaco-kinetics and hemodynamic effects of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;72(1):20–32. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.126179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ozawa CR, Banfi A, Glazer NL, Thurston G, Springer ML, Kraft PE, McDonald DM, Blau HM. Microenvironmental VEGF concentration, not total dose, determines a threshold between normal and aberrant angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(4):516–527. doi: 10.1172/JCI18420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang M, Vitharana SN, Peek LJ, Coop T, Berkland C. Polyelectrolyte complexes stabilize and controllably release vascular endothelial growth factor. Biomacro-molecules. 2007;8(5):1607–1614. doi: 10.1021/bm061211k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elcin YM, Dixit V, Gitnick T. Extensive in vivo angiogenesis following controlled release of human vascular endothelial cell growth factor: implications for tissue engineering and wound healing. Artif Org. 2001;25(7):558–565. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025007558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gu F, Amsden B, Neufeld R. Sustained delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor with alginate beads. J Control Rel. 2004;96(3):463–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peters MC, Isenberg BC, Rowley JA, Mooney DJ. Release from alginate enhances the biological activity of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1998;9(12):1267–1278. doi: 10.1163/156856298x00389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gu F, Neufeld R, Amsden B. Sustained release of bioactive therapeutic proteins from a biodegradable elastomeric device. J Control Rel. 2007;117(1):80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.09.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim TK, Burgess DJ. Pharmacokinetic characterization C-14-vascular endothelial growth factor controlled release microspheres using a rat model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2002;54(7):897–905. doi: 10.1211/002235702760089009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.King TW, Patrick CW. Development and in vitro characterization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-loaded poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly (ethylene glycol) microspheres using a solid encapsulation/single emulsion/solvent extraction technique. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;51(3):383–390. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<383::aid-jbm12>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Faranesh AZ, Nastley MT, de la Cruz CP, Haller MF, Laquerriere P, Leong KW, McVeigh ER. In vitro release of vascular endothelial growth factor from gadolinium-doped biodegradable microspheres. Mag Res Med. 2004;51(6):1265–1271. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cleland JL, Duenas ET, Park A, Daugherty A, Kahn J, Kowalski J, Cuthbertson A. Development of poly-(D,L-lactide-coglycolide) microsphere formulations containing recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor to promote local angiogenesis. J Control Rel. 2001;72(1–3):13–24. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Richardson TP, Peters MC, Ennett AB, Mooney DJ. Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(11):1029–1034. doi: 10.1038/nbt1101-1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Patel ZS, Ueda H, Yamamoto M, Tabata Y, Mikos AG. In vitro and in vivo release of vascular endothelial growth factor from gelatin microparticles and biodegradable composite scaffolds. Pharm Res. 2008 doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9685-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rocha FG, Sundback CA, Krebs NJ, Leach JK, Mooney DJ, Ashley SW, Vacanti JP, Whang EE. The effect of sustained delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor on angiogenesis in tissue-engineered intestine. Biomaterials. 2008;29(19):2884–2890. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kawada A, Hiura N, Tajima S, Takahara H. Alginate oligosaccharides stimulate VEGF-mediated growth and migration of human endothelial cells. Arch Derm Res. 1999;291(10):542–547. doi: 10.1007/s004030050451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jay SM, Shepherd BR, Bertram JP, Pober JS, Saltzman WM. Engineering of multifunctional gels integrating highly efficient growth factor delivery with endothelial cell transplantation. FASEB J. 2008;22(8):2949–2956. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-108803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gombotz WR, Wee SF. Protein release from alginate matrices. Adv Drug Del Rev. 1998;31(3):267–285. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00124-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reis CP, Neufeld RJ, Vilela S, Ribeiro AJ, Veiga F. Review and current status of emulsion/dispersion technology using an internal gelation process for the design of alginate particles. J Microencap. 2006;23(3):245–257. doi: 10.1080/02652040500286086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morch YA, Donati I, Strand BL, Skjak-Braek G. Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on alginate microbeads. Biomacromol. 2006;7(5):1471–1480. doi: 10.1021/bm060010d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cai L, Li XK, Song Y, Cherian MG. Essentiality, toxicology and chelation therapy of zinc and copper. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(23):2753–2763. doi: 10.2174/092986705774462950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aslani P, Kennedy RA. Studies on diffusion in alginate gels.1. Effect of cross-linking with calcium or zinc ions on diffusion of acetaminophen. J Control Rel. 1996;42(1):75–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gray CJ, Dowsett J. Retention of insulin in alginate gel beads. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;31(6):607–612. doi: 10.1002/bit.260310613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chan LW, Jin Y, Heng PWS. Cross-linking mechanisms of calcium and zinc in production of alginate microspheres. Int J Pharm. 2002;242(1–2):255–258. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(02)00169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Penman A, Sanderso Gr. Method for determination of uronic acid sequence in alginates. Carbohydrate Res. 1972;25(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)81637-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Klock G, Frank H, Houben R, Zekorn T, Horcher A, Siebers U, Wohrle M, Federlin K, Zimmermann U. Production of purified alginates suitable for use in immunoisolated transplantation. Appl Micro Biotechnol. 1994;40(5):638–643. doi: 10.1007/BF00173321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zheng CH, Gao JQ, Zhang YP, Liang WQ. A protein delivery system: biodegradable alginate-chitosan-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) composite micro-spheres. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2004;323(4):1321–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm. 1983;15(1):25–35. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600721021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) Adv Drug Del Rev. 2001;48(2–3):139–157. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nakatsu MN, Sainson RCA, Perez-dei-Pulgar S, Aoto JN, Aitkenhead M, Taylor KL, Carpenter PM, Hughes CCW. VEGF(121) and VEGF(165) regulate blood vessel diameter through vascular endothelial growth fact or receptor 2 in an in vitro angiogenesis model. Lab Invest. 2003;83(12):1873–1885. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000107160.81875.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miao S, Cheng K, Weng W, Du P, Shen G, Han G, Yan W, Zhang S. Fabrication and evaluation of Zn containing fluoridated hydroxyapatite layer with Zn release ability. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(2):441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Meerarani P, Ramadass P, Toborek M, Bauer HC, Bauer H, Hennig B. Zinc protects against apoptosis of endothelial cells induced by linoleic acid and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(1):81–87. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.De S, Robinson D. Polymer relationships during preparation of chitosan-alginate and poly-L-lysine-alginate nanospheres. J Control Rel. 2003;89(1):101–112. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00098-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee DW, Hwang SJ, Park JB, Park HJ. Preparation and release characteristics of polymer-coated and blended alginate microspheres. J Microencap. 2003;20(2):179–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ribeiro AJ, Silva C, Ferreira D, Veiga F. Chitosan-reinforced alginate micro-spheres obtained through the emulsification/internal gelation technique. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2005;25(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Silva CM, Ribeiro AJ, Figueiredo M, Ferreira D, Veiga F. Microencapsulation of hemoglobin in chitosan-coated alginate microspheres prepared by emulsification/internal gelation. AAPS J. 2005;7(4):E903–E913. doi: 10.1208/aapsj070488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Prokop A, Hunkeler D, DiMari S, Haralson MA, Wang TG. Water soluble polymers for immunoisolation I: Complex coacervation and cytotoxicity. Microen-cap - Micro - Inifert. 1998;136:1–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Strand BL, Ryan L, Veld PI, Kulseng B, Rokstad AM, Skjak-Braek G, Espevik T. Poly-L-lysine induces fibrosis on alginate microcapsules via the induction of cytokines. Cell Transplant. 2001;10(3):263–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zekorn T, Horcher A, Siebers U, Schnettler R, Klock G, Hering B, Zimmermann U, Bretzel RG, Federlin K. Barium-cross-linked alginate beads – a simple, one-step method for successful immunoisolated transplantation of islets of langerhans. Acta Diab. 1992;29(2):99–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zekorn T, Siebers U, Horcher A, Schnettler R, Klock G, Bretzel RG, Zimmermann U, Federlin K. Barium-alginate beads for immunoisolated transplantation of islets of langerhans. Transplant Proc. 1992;24(3):937–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Siebers U, Zekorn T, Horcher A, Hering B, Bretzel RG, Zimmermann U, Federlin K. In vitro testing of rat and porcine islets microencapsulated in barium alginate beads. Transplant Proc. 1992;24(3):950–951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cui YX, Shakesheff KM, Adams G. Encapsulation of RIN-m5F cells within Ba2+ cross-linked alginate beads affects proliferation and insulin secretion. J Microencap. 2006;23(6):663–676. doi: 10.1080/02652040600789245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Haug A, Smidsrod O. Effect of divalent metals on properties of alginate solutions 2. Comparison of different metal ions. Acta Chem Scand. 1965;19(2):341–347. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mumper RJ, Hoffman AS, Puolakkainen PA, Bouchard LS, Gombotz WR. Calcium-alginate beads for the oral delivery of transforming growth factor-beta (1) – stabilization of Tgf-beta(1) by the addition of polyacrylic-acid within acid-treated beads. J Control Rel. 1994;30(3):241–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pillay V, Danckwerts MP, Muhidinov Z, Fassihi R. Novel modulation of drug delivery using binary zinc-alginate-pectinate polyspheres for zero-order kinetics over several days: Experimental design strategy to elucidate the crosslinking mechanism. Drug Devel Ind Pharm. 2005;31(2):191–207. doi: 10.1081/ddc-200047806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kidane A, Guimond P, Ju TCR, Sanchez M, Gibson J, North A, HogenEsch H, Bowersock TL. Effects of cellulose derivatives and poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) tri-block copolymers (Pluronic (R) surfactants) on the properties of alginate based microspheres and their interactions with phagocytic cells. J Control Rel. 2002;85(1–3):181–189. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00281-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES