Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
The present pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of an aerobic exercise training (AET) program alone or combined with an antihypertensive agent (irbesartan) to reduce blood pressure (BP) and enhance heart rate variability (HRV) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.
METHODS:
Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with exercise and placebo (n=11) or exercise and irbesartan (n=10). Subjects underwent 24 h BP monitoring and 24 h electrocardiographic recording before and after the 12-week AET. HRV was investigated using three indexes from the power spectral analysis and three indexes calculated from the time domain. The AET program consisted of exercising on a calibrated ergocycle for 30 min three times per week. Five patients in the placebo group were excluded during follow-up because they were not compliant.
RESULTS:
There was no change in 24 h systolic and diastolic BP before (130±14 mmHg and 70±3 mmHg, respectively) and after (128±8 mmHg and 70±8 mmHg, respectively) exercise training in the placebo group, whereas in the irbesartan group systolic and diastolic BP decreased from 135±9 mmHg and 76±9 mmHg to 126±12 mmHg and 72±8 mmHg, respectively (P<0.02). There were no changes in HRV parameters in either group.
CONCLUSIONS:
The present study suggests that a 12-week AET program is not associated with a significant reduction in BP or enhancement in HRV, whereas an AET program combined with irbe-sartan is associated with a reduction in 24 h BP.
Keywords: Autonomic nervous system, Exercise training, Hypertension, Respiratory disease
Abstract
HISTORIQUE ET OBJECTIFS :
La présente étude pilote a été entre-prise pour évaluer l’efficacité d’un programme d’entraînement aérobique (EA), seul ou allié à un antihypertenseur (irbesartan), à réduire la tension artérielle (TA) et à améliorer la variabilité de la fréquence cardiaque (VFC) en présence de bronchopneumopathie obstructive chronique (BPOC).
MÉTHODES :
Les auteurs ont assigné aléatoirement 21 patients à un traitement à double insu reposant sur l’exercice et un placebo (n = 11) ou sur l’exercice et l’irbesartan (n = 10). Les sujets ont été soumis à une surveillance de la tension artérielle et du rythme cardiaque des 24 heures avant, puis après les 12 semaines d’EA. La VFC a été vérifiée à l’aide de trois indices de l’analyse spectrale de puissance et de trois indices calculés à partir du domaine temporel. Le programme d’EA comportait une séance d’entraînement sur un ergocycle calibré pendant 30 minutes, trois fois par semaine. Cinq patients du groupe sous placebo ont été exclus durant le suivi en raison de leur piètre fidélité au protocole.
RÉSULTATS :
On n’a observé aucun changement de la TA systolique et diastolique des 24 heures avant (130 ± 14 mm Hg et 70 ± 3 mm Hg, respectivement) et après (128 ± 8 mm Hg et 70 ± 8 mm Hg, respectivement) la séance d’exercice dans le groupe sous placebo, tandis que dans le groupe sous irbesartan, la TA systolique et diastolique est passée de 135 ± 9 mm Hg et de 76 ± 9 mm Hg à 126 ± 12 mm Hg et 72 ± 8 mm Hg, respectivement (p < 0,02). On n’a noté aucun changement quant aux paramètres de la VFC dans les deux groupes.
CONCLUSIONS :
La présente étude laisse supposer qu’un programme d’EA de 12 semaines n’est associé à aucune réduction significative de la TA ni amélioration de la VFC, tandis qu’un programme d’EA allié à un traitement par irbesartan est associé à une réduction de la TA des 24 heures.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide (1), and is increasing in prevalence (2). Furthermore, COPD is frequently associated with comorbidities leading to cardiovascular diseases (3). Of note, patients with COPD are at two- to threefold increased risk of ischemic heart disease, stroke and sudden cardiac death, independent of other risk factors (4,5). However, the mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular diseases in COPD patients remain largely speculative (6). High blood pressure (BP) at rest and during exercise is common in COPD patients (7–9). High BP is a well-known risk factor of cardiovascular diseases (10), and may be an important mechanism of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in COPD patients. Because aerobic exercise training (AET) has been shown to reduce high BP in healthy subjects (11), this treatment modality might be effective at reducing systemic BP in COPD patients.
Previous studies (12–15) have shown that normoxemic and hypoxemic patients with COPD appear to have impaired cardiac autonomic modulation at rest, as reflected by reduced heart rate variability (HRV). Decreased HRV is associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction (16–19), and it is also associated with a higher incidence of cardiac events among subjects without previous coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure (20,21). While AET has been associated with an increase in parasympathetic activity and the concomitant decrease of sympathetic activity in healthy subjects (22,23), cardiac autonomic response to exercise training has not been well characterized in patients with COPD.
We hypothesized that AET could be an effective intervention to enhance HRV and lower BP in patients with COPD. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of an AET program alone or combined with an anti-hypertensive agent (irbesartan) on 24 h ambulatory BP and HRV in patients with COPD.
METHODS
Originally, 38 COPD patients from the cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program at Laval Hospital (Quebec City, Quebec) were recruited to participate in the present study. The patients included had a diagnosis of COPD based on previous or current smoking history, clinical evaluation and pulmonary function tests. Subjects with one of the following criteria were excluded from the study: recent heart failure or acute coronary syndrome (within three months), hepatic or renal dysfunction, significant thyroid disease, use of benzodi-azepines or medications known to influence the autonomic nervous system (beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers, alpha-agonists), any connective tissue disease, osteoporosis and a history of malignancy. The patients were required to have an office resting BP greater than 140/90 mmHg or an exercise BP greater than 220/100 mmHg for inclusion in the present study. Current use of an antihypertensive agent was not an exclusion criterion, except for angiotensin receptor inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. After a baseline evaluation, 21 patients were included in this protocol. The present study had a duration of three months. The participants were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with exercise and placebo (n=11) or exercise and irbesartan (n=10). The research protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and signed informed consent was obtained from each subject.
Choice of antihypertensive medication
Several classes of antihypertensive medication are not well tolerated in individuals with COPD: beta-blockers may cause bronchospasm; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are often associated with cough; and calcium channel blockers may cause peripheral edema, a common problem in COPD. Angiotensin II receptor inhibitors are well tolerated and are usually free of adverse effects that may prevent their use in patients with COPD. A regimen of 150 mg of irbesartan once per day was used.
Assessments
Before starting the present study, all patients underwent initial screening assessment that included a medical history and a physical examination.
Anthropometric measurements
Body weight and height were obtained from all participants. Body mass index was calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in metres).
Pulmonary function tests and arterial blood gases
Standard pulmonary function tests (including spirometry), lung volumes and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide were obtained in all COPD patients according to recommended procedures (24). Results were compared with predicted normal values from the European Community for Coal and Steel/European Respiratory Society (25). Arterial O2 partial pressure and CO2 partial pressure were measured (AVL 995, AVL Scientific Corp, USA).
Resting BP measurement
Office BP measurements were obtained from each patient in the supine position after 15 min of rest. BP was taken in both arms and the highest measurement was used for analysis.
24 h BP monitoring
Ambulatory BP monitoring was conducted during a typical day. A 24 h ambulatory BP monitor measured BP at 20 min intervals between 06:00 and 11:00 (daytime), and at 30 min intervals between 23:00 and 06:00 (nighttime). Mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) values were computed based on all valid readings. Accuracy of the ambulatory BP monitor was validated against a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer. To demonstrate adequate validity, the mean of three clinic and ambulatory BP measurements taken simultaneously were required to match within plus or minus 5 mmHg (model 90207, SpaceLabs Inc, USA).
Exercise test
Subjects were seated on an electrically braked cycle ergometer (Corival 400, Lode, Netherlands) and connected to an expired gas analysis circuit through a mouthpiece. The gas analysis circuit consisted of a pneumotachograph, O2 and CO2 analyzers, and a mixing chamber (Qplex, Quinton Instruments Co, USA). After a 5 min period of rest, a progressive stepwise exercise test was performed until exhaustion. Five-breath averages of ventilation, oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and CO2 production were obtained. These parameters were measured at rest and during exercise testing. Each exercise stage lasted 1 min and increments of 10 W were used. Heart rate and BP were measured at 1 min and 2 min intervals, respectively, during the exercise test. BP measurements were taken with an automatic BP monitor (model 410, Quinton Instruments Co, USA).
Exercise training
The AET program for the COPD patients consisted of exercising on a calibrated ergocycle for 30 min three times per week for 12 weeks. The work rate was set at 80% of the maximal power output evaluated during the V̇O2 max evaluation. During the training sessions, patients were closely supervised by a physiotherapist and an exercise physiologist to help them reach their target training workload intensity. The session also included upper extremity exercises, self-pace walking, stretching and relaxing. Detailed information on exercise prescription and supervision modalities used in this program have been previously published (26).
HRV
The presence of subclinical cardiac autonomic dysfunction was evaluated with HRV indexes. HRV was derived from a 24 h electrocardiographic (ECG) recording (Holter series 8500, Marquette Electronics, USA) assessed while subjects performed their usual daily activities. HRV, using frequency and time domains, was assessed and several indexes were determined. The powers of very low frequency (LF) (0.0033 Hz to 0.04 Hz) and LF (0.04 Hz to 0.15 Hz) are considered to be an index of both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, whereas the power of high frequency (HF) (0.15 Hz to 0.4 Hz) is considered to be an index of solely parasympathetic activity. The LF/HF ratio was calculated, which reflects sympathovagal balance. Using the time domain, the SD of the normal-to-normal (NN) intervals, which is the square root of variance and which reflects all the cyclic components responsible for variability in the period of recording, was calculated; it is an estimate of overall HRV. NN intervals included all intervals between adjacent QRS complexes resulting from sinus node depolarization in the entire 24 h ECG recording. The square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals, which is an estimate of short-term components of HRV, was also calculated. Finally, the SD of the average NN intervals calculated over 5 min periods, which is an estimate of long-term components of HRV, was determined. The complete signal was carefully edited using visual checks and manual correction of individual NN intervals and QRS complex classifications.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to compare characteristics of the two groups. Data were reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired t test to compare the irbesartan and placebo groups at baseline and after the training program, and a paired t test was used to compare the effect of physical training and treatment in both groups. A Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used when the equal variance test failed. A χ2 test and a Fisher’s exact test were performed to compare proportions when appropriate. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Study sample
At the beginning of the recruitment, 38 COPD patients performed baseline evaluation. However, some of them met exclusion criteria: 10 patients took antihypertensive medication such as angiotensin receptor inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, five patients had a resting BP below 140/90 mmHg, and two patients had decided not to participate in the exercise program. Thus, only 21 patients were randomly assigned in the present study (10 in the irbe-sartan group and 11 in the placebo group). Furthermore, five patients in the placebo group were excluded during the follow-up. The reasons for premature withdrawal during this double-blind treatment period included the presence of side effects and noncompliance to placebo or exercise training. Thus, for the analysis, 10 patients were in the irbesartan group and six patients were in the placebo group.
Baseline evaluation
The characteristics of patients in the irbesartan group and in the placebo group who completed the study are shown in Table 1. Age and body mass index were comparable between both groups. Airflow obstruction was more severe in the placebo group than in the irbesartan group (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity: 42±7% predicted versus 56±14% predicted, respectively; P<0.05). Arterial blood gases were similar between the two groups. Table 2 shows that resting BP, 24 h BP, daytime BP, nighttime BP and maximal exercise BP were comparable between the irbesartan group and the placebo group at baseline. The HRV indexes in the time and frequency domains were also similar at baseline between both groups (Table 3).
TABLE 1.
Characteristic | Irbesartan n=10 | Placebo n=6 |
---|---|---|
Age, years | 67±7 | 72±5 |
Sex (female/male) | 3/7 | 5/1 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 28.9±6.3 | 23.6±4.1 |
FVC, L | 2.19±0.68 | 1.76±0.56 |
FVC, % predicted | 63±16 | 63±15 |
FEV1, L | 1.21±0.45 | 0.72±0.21* |
FEV1, % predicted | 50±19 | 39±9 |
FEV1/FVC | 56±14 | 42±7* |
Total lung capacity, % predicted | 117±20 | 129±15 |
Residual volume, % predicted | 179±48 | 244±71 |
Residual volume/total lung capacity | 53±11 | 61±11 |
DLCO, % predicted | 80±19 | 63±18 |
PaO2, mmHg | 87±13 | 88±12 |
PaCO2, mmHg | 41±6 | 43±5 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated.
P<0.05 versus irbesartan. DLCO Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC Forced vital capacity; PaCO2 Partial pressure of CO2; PaO2 Partial pressure of O2
TABLE 2.
Irbesartan plus exercise (baseline) | Placebo plus exercise (baseline) | Irbesartan plus exercise (post-training) | Placebo plus exercise (post-training) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Resting SBP, mmHg | 151±19 | 140±15 | 131±18* | 136±15 |
Resting DBP, mmHg | 78±8 | 72±8 | 71±10* | 68±10 |
24 h SBP, mmHg | 135±9 | 130±14 | 126±12† | 128±8 |
24 h DBP, mmHg | 76±9 | 70±3 | 72±8* | 70±8 |
Daytime SBP, mmHg | 139±11 | 130±14 | 129±15† | 131±8 |
Daytime DBP, mmHg | 80±11 | 71±2 | 74±10* | 72±7 |
Nighttime SBP, mmHg | 125±8 | 128±16 | 121±10 | 121±9 |
Nighttime DBP, mmHg | 68±6 | 66±6 | 67±7 | 65±8 |
Maximal exercise SBP, mmHg | 237±27 | 211±34 | 220±27* | 195±36 |
Maximal exercise DBP, mmHg | 98±17 | 102±28 | 86±14* | 82±31 |
Work rate, W | 95±27 | 48±20 | 107±29* | 54±19 |
Peak V̇O2, mL/min/kg | 15±3 | 11±4 | 16±3 | 11±3 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
P<0.05 before and after irbesartan;
P<0.01 before and after irbesartan. DBP Diastolic blood pressure; SBP Systolic blood pressure; V̇O2 Oxygen uptake
TABLE 3.
Irbesartan plus exercise (baseline) | Placebo plus exercise (baseline) | Irbesartan plus exercise (post-training) | Placebo plus exercise (post-training) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SDNN, ms | 134±30 | 121±27 | 144±36 | 113±38 |
p-NN50, % | 9±9 | 10±9 | 9±8 | 10±8 |
r-MSSD, ms | 30±12 | 31±11 | 29±11 | 30±10 |
VLF, ms | 3.27±0.20 | 3.06±0.25 | 3.27±0.21 | 3.09±0.51 |
LF, ms | 2.92±0.32 | 2.76±0.44 | 2.91±0.32 | 2.77±0.42 |
HF, ms | 2.41±0.34 | 2.42±0.37 | 2.40±0.41 | 2.37±0.45 |
LF/HF ratio | 2.96±1.25 | 2.12±1.00 | 3.06±1.32 | 2.38±0.95 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. HF High frequency; LF Low frequency; p-NN50 Percentage of adjacent normal-to-normal (NN) intervals differing by more than 50 ms; r-MSSD Square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals; SDNN Standard deviation of all NN intervals; VLF Very low frequency
Effects of exercise training on BP
In the study, 16 patients completed the 12-week training program and participated in an average of 30±2 sessions (range, 26 to 33 sessions) representing a compliance rate of 91±6%. Resting BP, 24 h BP, daytime BP and maximal exercise BP decreased significantly in the irbesartan group, whereas these parameters did not change significantly in the placebo group (Table 2). Nighttime SBP and DBP did not change in both groups.
Effects of exercise training on HRV
HRV indexes did not change following the 12-week AET program in either group (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this is the first report evaluating the effects of an AET program alone or combined with an antihypertensive agent on resting BP, 24 h ambulatory BP, maximal exercise BP and HRV in patients with COPD. The present study suggests that a 12-week AET program was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in resting BP, 24 h ambulatory BP, daytime BP, nighttime BP, maximal exercise BP or an enhancement in HRV in COPD patients. However, we observed that AET combined with irbesartan was associated with a reduction in resting BP, 24 h BP, daytime BP and maximal exercise BP. However, AET combined with irbesartan failed to reduce nighttime BP or to enhance HRV indexes in patients with COPD.
Exercise programs that primarily involve endurance activity constitute a cornerstone therapy for the primary prevention, treatment and control of systemic hypertension. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (10), the Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension (27) and the European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines (28) recommend regular physical exercise for the prevention of high BP and the management of patients with hypertension. Although the optimal training frequency, intensity, time and type of exercise needs to be better defined to optimize the BP lowering influence of exercise (11), particularly in specific populations such as COPD patients, we applied the recommended exercise prescription for patients with high BP in our study. However, the positive effect of exercise on hypertension in older individuals is not clear (29,30). Indeed, randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of chronic aerobic exercise on resting BP in normotensive and hypertensive adults (older than 50 years of age) have led to conflicting results (29,30). In the study by Hagberg et al (30), it was reported that moderate intensity exercise training (70% to 85% V̇O2 max) in hypertensive older individuals (60 to 69 years of age) failed to reduce resting SBP significantly. In contrast, Cononie et al (29) showed that endurance exercise training produces a significant reduction in resting SBP in individuals 70 to 79 years of age. Results regarding the impact of AET on ambulatory BP in older adults are also conflicting (31–33). Seals and Reiling (33) showed that 24 h BP was unchanged in older hypertensive individuals after six months of regular AET. In contrast, Jessup et al (32) reported that a 16-week endurance exercise training program decreases mean 24 h ambulatory SBP and DBP significantly in normotensive older adults. In this study, the participants completed a 16-week endurance exercise training program, and the training consisted of exercising for 1 h three times a week on treadmills and stair-climbers. In our study, the patients performed a 12-week AET program, 30 min three times a week on an ergocycle. In the study by Jessup et al (32), peak V̇O2 increased by 14% (P=0.001), whereas it did not change significantly in our patients; perhaps our exercise stimulus was too light to increase exercise capacity and therefore decrease SBP.
In the present study, mean resting and 24 h ambulatory SBP were 140±15 mmHg and 130±14 mmHg, respectively, at baseline in the placebo group. The patients in our study were practically normotensive at baseline. Exercise training is recognized as being more effective at reducing BP in young hypertensive patients compared with young normotensive patients (11). Therefore, it may not be surprising that the decrease in resting and ambulatory BP were not significant after the training program, especially in light of no significant increase in V̇O2 maximum. In accordance with the literature, maximal exercise BP was unchanged after AET in our study (34).
AET is recognized as an efficient modality to enhance HRV in healthy subjects. More specifically, Schuit et al (35) demonstrated that regular physical activity increases HRV in older healthy subjects and effects of training were more pronounced in the most sedentary subjects at baseline. COPD patients may be considered inactive compared with healthy subjects matched for age. Nevertheless, we found that a 12-week aerobic program was not associated with enhanced HRV in COPD patients.
Irbesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist recognized to reduce resting and ambulatory BP (36). Once-daily administration of irbesartan to healthy subjects and individuals with mild-to-moderate systemic hypertension lowered BP 24 h after intake in a dose-dependent manner (36). In our study, exercise training combined with irbesartan reduced resting BP, 24 h ambulatory BP, daytime BP and maximal exercise BP in COPD patients.
Exercise training combined with irbesartan was not efficient at enhancing HRV in patients with COPD. Losartan, another angiotensin II receptor antagonist, has been reported to enhance HRV in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (37). However, clinical trials regarding the impacts of antihypertensive treatment on HRV have reported mixed results (37,38). These studies varied considerably in study design, including age and types of participants (healthy subjects versus hypertensive patients), BP regimen, duration and route of antihypertensive therapy, and methodology of assessment of HRV, making comparison in terms of the influence of treatment on HRV limited. COPD patients are a specific population and the lack of effect of irbesartan on HRV needs further study.
The major limitation of the current study is the number of participants at the end of the study. Only six patients in the placebo group and 10 patients in the irbesartan group completed the training program. One of these patients refused to complete the final evaluation, including the 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring and the 24 h ECG recording. Thus, data reported here should be considered as pilot findings.
CONCLUSIONS
The present results suggest that AET is not associated with a reduction in BP or enhanced HRV in COPD patients. The addition of AET with irbesartan may be effective at decreasing resting BP, 24 h ambulatory BP, daytime BP and maximal exercise BP in this specific population.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Marthe Bélanger, Marie-Josée Breton and Brigitte Jean for their technical assistance.
Footnotes
FUNDING: This study was supported by a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFICTS OF INTEREST: P Poirier is a clinician-scientist of the Fonds de recherche en Santé du Québec. F Maltais is a research scholar of the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec. K Marquis is a recipient of a PhD training award of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pauwels RA, Rabe KF. Burden and clinical features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Lancet. 2004;364:613–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16855-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1498–504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Agusti AG, Noguera A, Sauleda J, Sala E, Pons J, Busquets X. Systemic effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2003;21:347–60. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00405703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Friedman GD, Klatsky AL, Siegelaub AB. Lung function and risk of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:1071–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197605132942001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Engström G, Lind P, Hedblad B, et al. Lung function and cardiovascular risk: Relationship with inflammation-sensitive plasma proteins. Circulation. 2002;106:2555–60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000037220.00065.0d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sin DD, Man SF. Why are patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases? The potential role of systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation. 2003;107:1514–9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000056767.69054.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maltais F, Whittom F, LeBlanc P, Marquis K, Belleau R, Jobin J. Blood pressure and double product increase during exercise in patients with COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:A451. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Antonelli Incalzi R, Fuso L, De Rosa M, et al. Co-morbidity contributes to predict mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2794–800. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10122794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fabbri LM, Rabe KF. From COPD to chronic systemic inflammatory syndrome? Lancet. 2007;370:797–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61383-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pescatello LS, Franklin BA, Fagard R, Farquhar WB, Kelley GA, Ray CA. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:533–53. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000115224.88514.3a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stewart AG, Waterhouse JC, Howard P. Cardiovascular autonomic nerve function in patients with hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 1991;4:1207–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Volterrani M, Scalvini S, Mazzuero G, et al. Decreased heart rate variability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1994;106:1432–7. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.5.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stein PK, Nelson P, Rottman JN, et al. Heart rate variability reflects severity of COPD in PiZ alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 1998;113:327–33. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scalvini S, Porta R, Zanelli E, et al. Effects of oxygen on autonomic nervous system dysfunction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 1999;13:119–24. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.13111999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wolf MM, Varigos GA, Hunt D, Sloman JG. Sinus arrhythmia in acute myocardial infarction. Med J Aust. 1978;2:52–3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1978.tb131339.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Jr, Moss AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:256–62. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90795-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bigger JT, Jr, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992;85:164–71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farrell TG, Bashir Y, Cripps T, et al. Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:687–97. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90791-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsuji H, Venditti FJ, Jr, Manders ES, et al. Reduced heart rate variability and mortality risk in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;90:878–83. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ, Jr, et al. Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1996;94:2850–5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.11.2850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Melanson EL, Freedson PS. The effect of endurance training on resting heart rate variability in sedentary adult males. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;85:442–9. doi: 10.1007/s004210100479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tuomainen P, Peuhkurinen K, Kettunen R, Rauramaa R. Regular physical exercise, heart rate variability and turbulence in a 6-year randomized controlled trial in middle-aged men: The DNASCO study. Life Sci. 2005;77:2723–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. [Standardisation of spirometry.] Rev Mal Respir. 2007;24:2, S27–49. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Work Group on Standardization of Respiratory Function Tests. European Community for Coal and Steel. Official position of the European Respiratory Society. Rev Mal Respir. 1994;11(Suppl 3):S5–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maltais F, LeBlanc P, Simard C, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptation to endurance training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:442–7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.2.8756820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Touyz RM, Campbell N, Logan A, Gledhill N, Petrella R, Padwal R. The 2004 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part III – Lifestyle modifications to prevent and control hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2004;20:55–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.2003European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension J Hypertens 2003211011–53.(Errata in 2003;21:2203–4 and 2004;22:435). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cononie CC, Graves JE, Pollock ML, Phillips MI, Sumners C, Hagberg JM. Effect of exercise training on blood pressure in 70- to 79-yr-old men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:505–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hagberg JM, Montain SJ, Martin WH, 3rd, Ehsani AA. Effect of exercise training in 60- to 69-year-old persons with essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:348–53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90533-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pescatello LS, Kulikowich JM. The aftereffects of dynamic exercise on ambulatory blood pressure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1855–61. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200111000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jessup JV, Lowenthal DT, Pollock ML, Turner T. The effects of endurance exercise training on ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive older adults. Geriatr Nephrol Urol. 1998;8:103–9. doi: 10.1023/a:1008287320868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seals DR, Reiling MJ. Effect of regular exercise on 24-hour arterial pressure in older hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 1991;18:583–92. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.18.5.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Van Hoof R, Hespel P, Fagard R, Lijnen P, Staessen J, Amery A. Effect of endurance training on blood pressure at rest, during exercise and during 24 hours in sedentary men. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:945–9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90145-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schuit AJ, van Amelsvoort LG, Verheij TC, et al. Exercise training and heart rate variability in older people. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:816–21. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fogari R, Ambrosoli S, Corradi L, et al. 24-hour blood pressure control by once-daily administration of irbesartan assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Irbesartan Multicenter Investigators’ Group. J Hypertens. 1997;15:1511–8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715120-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chern CM, Hsu HY, Hu HH, Chen YY, Hsu LC, Chao AC. Effects of atenolol and losartan on baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in uncomplicated essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006;47:169–74. doi: 10.1097/01.fjc.0000199225.17928.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ylitalo A, Airaksinen KE, Sellin L, Huikuri HV. Effects of combination antihypertensive therapy on baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:885–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]