Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2008 Oct 10;117(4):568–573. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800012

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Associated with Body Burden Levels of Dioxin and Related Compounds among Japan’s General Population

Hirokazu Uemura 1,, Kokichi Arisawa 1,2, Mineyoshi Hiyoshi 1, Atsushi Kitayama 1, Hidenobu Takami 1, Fusakazu Sawachika 1, Satoru Dakeshita 1, Kentaro Nii 1, Hiroshi Satoh 2, Yoshio Sumiyoshi 2, Kenji Morinaga 2, Kazunori Kodama 2, Taka-ichiro Suzuki 2, Masaki Nagai 2, Tsuguyoshi Suzuki 2,*
PMCID: PMC2679600  PMID: 19440495

Abstract

Background

Environmental exposure to some persistent organic pollutants has been reported to be associated with a metabolic syndrome in the U.S. population.

Objectives

We evaluated the associations of body burden levels of dioxins and related compounds with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among the general population in Japan.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1,374 participants not occupationally exposed to these pollutants, living throughout Japan during 2002–2006. In fasting blood samples, we measured biochemical factors and determined lipid-adjusted concentrations of 10 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), 7 polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and 12 dioxin-like poly-chlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs) all of which have toxic equivalency factors. We also performed a questionnaire survey.

Results

The toxic equivalents (TEQs) of PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs and total TEQs had significant adjusted associations with metabolic syndrome, whether or not we excluded diabetic subjects. By analyzing each component of metabolic syndrome separately, the DL-PCB TEQs and total TEQs were associated with all components, and the odds ratios (ORs) in the highest quartile of DL-PCB TEQs in four of the five components were higher than those for PCDDs or PCDFs. We also found congener-specific associations with metabolic syndrome; in particular, the highest quartiles of PCB-126 and PCB-105 had adjusted ORs of 9.1 and 7.3, respectively.

Conclusions

These results suggest that body burden levels of dioxins and related compounds, particularly those of DL-PCBs, are associated with metabolic syndrome. Of the components, high blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, and glucose intolerance were most closely associated with these pollutants.

Keywords: cross-sectional study, metabolic syndrome, dioxins, PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs, poly-chlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins


Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), collectively called dioxins, are produced through the burning of garbage and some types of chemical manufacturing processes. Legal regulations of dioxins in the 1990s in Japan have achieved a 95% reduction in their emissions from incinerators (Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan 2004). Some forms of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which are persistent organic pollutants (POPs), exhibit toxic actions similar to 2,3,7,8-tetra chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and are called dioxin-like PCBs (DL-PCBs). PCDDs/PCDFs and DL-PCBs are widely persistent in the environment because they are lipophilic and resistant to biological and chemical degradation. Several congeners of these pollutants exhibit various biological and toxic actions, such as dermal toxicity, immunotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and adverse effects on reproductive, neuro behavioral, and endocrine functions (Lindström et al. 1995; Weisglas-Kuperus 1998). Johnson et al. (2001) and Lee et al. (2006) have suggested that these actions could be induced by low-level exposure to these pollutants.

Metabolic syndrome, characterized by a cluster of metabolic disorders including central obesity, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, has been increasing in developed countries (Flegal et al. 2002; Ford 2005). The health impact of each component of the metabolic syndrome may be small, but the co-occurrence of several components may have considerably greater impact than any one alone (Nakanishi et al. 2003). Subjects suffering from metabolic syndrome may be at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (Lorenzo et al. 2003; Sattar et al. 2003) and cardiovascular diseases (Lakka et al. 2002; Malik et al. 2004; McNeill et al. 2005). Recently, background environmental exposure to some POPs has been reported to be associated with increased risk of diabetes (Lee et al. 2006) and with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (Lee et al. 2007) in the U.S. population in the 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Metabolic syndrome has become widely preva lent in the populations in Asian countries, including Japan, but whether similar associations exist among Asian populations has not been evaluated. A survey on the accumulation of dioxins and related compounds in humans was carried out beginning in 2002 under the supervision of the Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. In this article, we report the recent 5-year results of a cross-sectional study to evaluate the associations of body burden levels of PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, and with the prevalence of its components, among general inhabitants in Japan.

Materials and Methods

Survey areas and participants

We conducted this survey from 2002 to 2006 in Japan on 1,374 participants (627 male and 747 female) 15–73 years of age. The selection of survey areas and the recruitment of the participants have been reported previously (Uemura et al. 2008). Briefly, we divided the whole of Japan into five regional blocks (Table 1) and selected a single prefecture from each regional block every survey year. We recruited approximately 50 individuals in each prefecture; approximately 20 were from urban areas, 15 from farming village areas, and 15 from fishing village areas, with almost equal distribution of age and sex among the three areas. As a whole, the subjects participated from 75 different residential areas of 25 prefectures through 5 survey years and were evenly distributed in age and sex among the urban, farming, and fishing village areas in each survey year. Participants were required to have been living in the same area for at least 10 years, to have had no known occupational exposure to PCDDs/PCDFs and DL-PCBs, and to have no known severe anemia or other health problems that interfere with blood sampling. Participation in this study was essentially voluntary, and after we explained the details of this survey, we obtained written informed consent from each participant. We designed the study to recruit at least 250 participants every survey year; few subjects were excluded because of known severe anemia or other health problems during the survey years. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics (%) of the participants.

Both sexes (n = 1,374) Male (n = 627) Female (n = 747)
Age (years)
 15–29 20.7 22.7 19.0
 30–39 18.7 20.6 17.1
 40–49 21.9 20.3 23.3
 50–59 24.0 23.3 24.6
 60–73 14.7 13.2 15.9
Regional block
 Hokkaido/Tohoku 19.9 19.1 20.5
 Kanto/Koshin’etsu 20.0 17.2 22.4
 Tokai/Hokuriku/Kinki 20.5 24.4 17.3
 Chugoku/Shikoku 19.3 21.2 17.7
 Kyushu/Okinawa 20.3 18.0 22.2
Residential area
 Urban 40.2 37.6 42.3
 Farming village 32.0 33.0 31.2
 Fishing village 27.8 29.4 26.5
Survey year
 2002 18.9 18.7 19.0
 2003 19.8 19.6 20.0
 2004 19.2 17.9 20.4
 2005 21.0 21.5 20.5
 2006 21.2 22.3 20.2
Smoking habit
 Current 21.8 40.2 6.3
 Past 13.1 22.0 5.6
 Never 64.6 37.5 87.4
 Unknown 0.5 0.3 0.7
Drinking habit
 Regular 20.7 36.8 7.1
 Often 22.3 27.3 18.2
 Rarely or never 53.7 32.7 71.4
 Unknown 3.3 3.2 3.3

Questionnaire

We asked participants to complete a questionnaire to obtain data on individual characteristics, including body height and weight, residential and occupational histories, smoking and drinking habits, and past history of diseases and treatments. Regarding drinking habits, subjects were asked how often they had consumed beer, sake, shochu (rough distilled spirits), and whisky over the previous month. The frequency of each item in the questionnaire was classified into five categories: almost everyday (6 times/week), 3–4 times/week (3.5/week), 1–2 times/week (1.5/week), 1–2 times/month (0.35/week), and almost never (0.1/week). We did not specify the unit or portion of each item. The frequency of alcohol consumption was summarized as the sum of the frequency of each item and then divided into three categories: regular, ≥ 6 times/week; often, 1.5 to < 6 times/week; rarely or never, < 1.5 times/week.

Measurements

We obtained approximately 25 mL fasting venous blood from each participant, with 20 mL collected into Vacutainer tubes containing sodium heparin (VT-100H, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan; or 367677, Becton Dickinson and Company, Tokyo, Japan). PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs were analyzed in whole blood at the Institute of General Science for the Environment, METOCEAN Environment (currently IDEA Consultants, Inc., Shizuoka, Japan) by isotope dilution high-resolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, after liquid/liquid extraction and gel cleanup. The detailed analytical procedure of these chemicals has been previously reported (Nakamura et al. 2008). Percent blood lipid was measured gravimetrically using a sulfuric ammonium-ethanol/hexane technique. Concentrations of 7 PCDD congeners, 10 PCDF congeners, and 12 DL-PCB congeners that have toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). The limit of detection (LOD) was 1 pg/g lipid for PCDDs/PCDFs with four or five chlorine atoms, 2 pg/g lipid for PCDDs/PCDFs with six or seven chlorine atoms, 4 pg/g lipid for PCDDs/PCDFs with eight chlorine atoms, and 10 pg/g lipid for DL-PCBs.

We calculated toxic equivalents (TEQs) using the 1998 World Health Organization TEF (Van den Berg et al. 1998). We assigned zero concentrations to pollutant levels < LOD.

We determined high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the blood with an automatic biochemical analyzer (model 7450; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Blood pressure was measured in each subject sitting at rest. If a measurement was extremely high or low or far from everyday values, we tried again after a short rest and used the second measurement as the final measurement.

Assessment of metabolic syndrome

We assessed the prevalence of metabolic syndrome using a modification of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) definition (NCEP 2002). Some studies in Asia have suggested that the criteria of central obesity proposed by the NCEP, which is based on the data from Caucasians, is inappropriate for Asian populations, whose builds are generally smaller than those of Caucasians (Ko et al. 2005; Tan et al. 2004). Therefore, we diagnosed subjects with metabolic syndrome when they satisfied three or more of the following five criteria: a) body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 (rather than by abdominal waist circumference); b) serum triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL; c) serum HDL < 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/dL in women; d) systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg, or self-reported history of physician-diagnosed hypertension; e ) HbA1c ≥ 5.6% (rather than fasting serum glucose), or self-reported history of physician-diagnosed diabetes.

The association of diabetes mellitus with PCBs and other POPs is well established, and diabetes mellitus is a partial component of metabolic syndrome. Therefore, we further investigated the associations of these pollutants with metabolic syndrome in the absence of diabetes mellitus by excluding subjects who either self-reported a history of physician-diagnosed diabetes or had plasma HbA1c > 6.1%. This HbA1c level predicts fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, the standard for determining diabetes, with a sensitivity of 63.2% and a specificity of 97.4% (Rohlfing et al. 2000).

Statistical analysis

We evaluated the sex difference of BMIs by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We analyzed the associations of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, DL-PCBs, and total TEQs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome by excluding or including prevalent diabetes in logistic regressions, nonadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, smoking and drinking habits, regional block, residential area, and survey year. We tested the adjusted associations of the TEQs with the five components of metabolic syndrome in logistic regressions. We also evaluated separately the adjusted associations of the concentrations of the 16 selected congeners for which > 75% of the subjects had concentrations > LOD with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in logistic regressions: 1,2,3,7,8-penta (Pe) CDD, 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexa (Hx) CDD, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-hepta (Hp) CDD, octaCDD (OCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF, PCB-126, PCB-169, PCB-105, PCB-114, PCB-118, PCB-123, PCB-156, PCB-157, PCB-167, and PCB-189. In these analyses, we defined the first quartile (< 25th percentile) as the reference; created dummy variables for sex, regional block, residential area, survey year, smoking habit, and drinking habit; and included all except reference categories in the model. We conducted tests of trend using the median value for each quartile of the TEQs or the concentrations of the congeners in logistic models. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 8.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All p-values are two-tailed, and we considered those < 0.05 statistically significant.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. Of the 1,374 subjects, 627 (45.6%) were male and 747 (54.4%) were female. The medians (25th–75th percentiles) of BMI were 23.4 (21.6–25.7) kg/m2 and 21.6 (20.0–23.9) kg/m2 in male and female subjects, respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). Table 2 shows the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its five components in the subjects. Of the 1,374 subjects, we defined 160 (11.6%) subjects as having metabolic syndrome (105 men, 55 women). High blood pressure had a higher prevalence than the other components.

Table 2.

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its five components in the participants (%).

Both sexes (n = 1,374) Male (n = 627) Female (n = 747)
Metabolic syndrome
 Yes 11.6 16.7 7.4
 No 87.0 81.5 91.6
 Unknown 1.4 1.8 1.1
Componentsa
 BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2
  Yes 23.7 32.4 16.5
  No 75.3 66.2 82.9
  Unknown 1.0 1.4 0.7
Blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or a history of physician-diagnosed hypertension
  Yes 41.3 50.4 33.7
  No 58.6 49.6 66.1
  Unknown 0.1 0.0 0.1
Triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL
  Yes 16.2 26.3 7.8
  No 83.5 73.4 92.0
  Unknown 0.3 0.3 0.3
HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL in men or 50 mg/dL in women
  Yes 10.3 10.4 10.3
  No 89.4 89.3 89.4
  Unknown 0.3 0.3 0.3
HbA1c ≥ 5.6% or a history of physician-diagnosed diabetes
  Yes 11.2 13.4 9.4
  No 88.8 86.6 90.6
  Unknown 0.0 0.0 0.0
a

We diagnosed metabolic syndrome as the presence of three or more of these five components.

Table 3 lists the concentrations and TEQs for each PCDD, PCDF, and DL-PCB congener in the blood of the subjects. The medians of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, DL-PCBs, and total TEQs were 7.4, 4.5, 7.6, and 20 pg TEQ/g lipid, respectively.

Table 3.

Concentrations and TEQs for PCDD, PCDF, and DL-PCB congener in the blood of the subjects.

Congener Concentration [pg/g lipid; median (25%–75%)] TEFa TEQ [pg TEQ/g lipid; median (25%–75%)]
PCDDs
 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.0 (0.0–2.0) 1 1.0 (0.0–2.0)
 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 5.0 (3.0–7.0) 1 5.0 (3.0–7.0)
 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.0 (0.0–3.0) 0.1 0.0 (0.0–0.30)
 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 15 (9.0–21) 0.1 1.5 (0.90–2.1)
 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 3.0 (0.0–4.0) 0.1 0.30 (0.0–0.40)
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 12 (9.0–18) 0.01 0.12 (0.09–0.18)
 OCDD 140 (89–230) 0.0001 0.01 (0.01–0.02)
  Total PCDDs 7.4 (4.6–11.2)

PCDFs
 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.1 0.10 (0.0–0.20)
 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.05 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 7.0 (5.0–11.0) 0.5 3.5 (2.5–5.5)
 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 3.0 (0.0–4.0) 0.1 0.30 (0.0–0.40)
 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 3.0 (2.0–5.0) 0.1 0.30 (0.20–0.50)
 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.1 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.1 0.0 (0.0–0.20)
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2.0 (0.0–3.0) 0.01 0.02 (0.0–0.03)
 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.01 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
 OCDF 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0001 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
  Total PCDFs 4.5 (2.9–6.8)
Total PCDDs/PCDFs 12 (7.7–18)

PCBs
 PCB-77 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0001 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
 PCB-81 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0001 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
 PCB-126 40 (22–78) 0.1 4.0 (2.2–7.8)
 PCB-169 30 (20–50) 0.01 0.30 (0.20–0.50)
 Non-ortho PCBs 4.4 (2.4–8.3)
  PCB-105 1,300 (750–2,400) 0.0001 0.13 (0.08–0.24)
  PCB-114 460 (250–830) 0.0005 0.23 (0.13–0.42)
  PCB-118 7,500 (4,200–13,000) 0.0001 0.75 (0.42–1.3)
  PCB-123 100 (60–200) 0.0001 0.01 (0.01–0.02)
  PCB-156 2,800 (1,500–4,800) 0.0005 1.4 (0.75–2.4)
  PCB-157 770 (420–1,300) 0.0005 0.39 (0.21–0.65)
  PCB-167 1,300 (730–2,300) 0.00001 0.01 (0.01–0.02)
  PCB-189 320 (180–580) 0.0001 0.03 (0.02–0.06)
 Mono-ortho PCBs 3.0 (1.6–5.1)
  Total DL-PCBs 7.6 (4.4–13)
  Total TEQs 20 (12–31)

TCDF, tetrachlorodibenzofuran.

Table 4 lists the nonadjusted and adjusted associations of the TEQs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. All of the TEQs for PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs and total TEQs had significant nonadjusted and adjusted associations with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (tests of trend were all significant). The highest quartile of total TEQs had a high adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 5.3 (2.3–13) compared with the referent. Table 5 lists the nonadjusted and adjusted associations of the TEQs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, excluding the subjects with prevalent diabetes. Among the 65 diabetic subjects, we diagnosed 38 subjects with metabolic syndrome. When we excluded prevalent diabetes from the analyses, we defined 122 subjects as having metabolic syndrome. The adjusted associations of the TEQs of DL-PCBs with metabolic syndrome were strengthened, whereas those of PCDFs were slightly attenuated (p for trend = 0.07).

Table 4.

Nonadjusted and adjusted associations of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, DL-PCBs and total TEQs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

OR (95% CI)
TEQs No. of subjects No. of cases Nonadjusted Adjusteda
PCDDs
 < 4.60 343 15 Referent Referent
  ≥ 4.60 to < 7.39 344 39 2.8 (1.5–5.4) 2.2 (1.2–4.4)
  ≥ 7.39 to < 11.20 339 38 2.7 (1.5–5.2) 2.1 (1.1–4.3)
  ≥ 11.20 348 68 5.4 (3.1–10) 3.2 (1.6–6.7)
p for trend < 0.01 < 0.01

PCDFs
 < 2.90 330 9 Referent Referent
  ≥ 2.90 to < 4.50 347 40 4.6 (2.3–10) 4.0 (1.9–9.3)
  ≥ 4.50 to < 6.80 352 48 5.6 (2.9–12) 4.1 (1.9–9.7)
  ≥ 6.80 345 63 8.0 (4.1–17) 4.4 (2.0–11)
p for trend < 0.01 0.04

DL-PCBs
 < 4.40 339 14 Referent Referent
  ≥ 4.40 to < 7.60 339 27 2.0 (1.1–4.1) 1.9 (0.95–4.0)
  ≥ 7.60 to < 13.00 325 39 3.2 (1.7–6.2) 2.8 (1.3–6.2)
  ≥ 13.00 371 80 6.4 (3.6–12) 4.8 (2.2–11)
p for trend < 0.01 < 0.01

Total TEQs
 < 12.00 303 10 Referent Referent
  ≥ 12.00 to < 20.00 363 29 2.6 (1.3–5.6) 2.3 (1.1–5.3)
  ≥ 20.00 to < 31.00 353 47 4.5 (2.3–9.7) 3.7 (1.7–8.7)
  ≥ 31.00 355 74 7.7 (4.1–16) 5.3 (2.3–13)
p for trend < 0.01 < 0.01
a

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking habit, drinking habit, regional block, residential area, and survey year (model df = 19).

Table 5.

Nonadjusted and adjusted associations of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, DL-PCBs and total TEQs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, excluding the subjects with prevalent diabetes.

OR (95% CI)
TEQs No. of subjects No. of cases Nonadjusted Adjusteda
PCDDs
 < 4.49 325 12 Referent Referent
  ≥ 4.49 to < 7.27 329 31 2.7 (1.4–5.6) 2.2 (1.1–4.8)
  ≥ 7.27 to < 11.00 311 28 2.6 (1.3–5.3) 2.1 (0.99–4.7)
  ≥ 11.00 344 51 4.6 (2.5–9.2) 3.4 (1.6–7.6)
p for trend < 0.01 < 0.01

PCDFs
 < 2.83 326 9 Referent Referent
  ≥ 2.83 to < 4.40 326 31 3.7 (1.8–8.3) 3.5 (1.6–8.2)
  ≥ 4.40 to < 6.60 323 37 4.5 (2.2–10) 3.8 (1.7–9.2)
  ≥ 6.60 334 45 5.5 (2.8–12) 3.8 (1.6–9.7)
p for trend < 0.01 0.07

DL-PCBs
 < 4.28 327 9 Referent Referent
  ≥ 4.28 to < 7.40 320 24 2.9 (1.4–6.7) 3.1 (1.4–7.4)
  ≥ 7.40 to < 12.87 334 35 4.2 (2.1–9.4) 5.0 (2.1–13)
  ≥ 12.87 328 54 6.9 (3.5–15) 7.3 (2.9–20)
p for trend < 0.01 < 0.01

Total TEQs
 < 12.00 303 10 Referent Referent
  ≥ 12.00 to < 19.00 318 22 2.2 (1.0–4.9) 2.2 (0.98–5.0)
  ≥ 19.00 to < 30.00 345 35 3.3 (1.7–7.2) 3.2 (1.4–7.6)
  ≥ 30.00 343 55 5.6 (2.9–12) 5.1 (2.1–13)
p for trend < 0.01 < 0.01
a

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking habit, drinking habit, regional block, residential area, and survey year (model df = 19).

The adjusted associations of the TEQs with the prevalence of each component of metabolic syndrome are shown in Table 6. All of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs and total TEQs were associated with high blood pressure and elevated triglycerides (tests of trend were all significant). The TEQs of PCDDs and DL-PCBs and total TEQs showed trends for the associations with high HbA1c (p for trends all < 0.01). In particular, the highest quartiles of DL-PCBs and total TEQs had adjusted ORs of 8.0 and 8.6, respectively, in the prevalence of high HbA1c. Of note, the TEQ of DL-PCBs as well as total TEQs showed trends for the associations with all five components of metabolic syndrome, and the ORs in the highest quartile of the TEQ of DL-PCBs in four of the five components were higher than those for PCDDs or PCDFs. In contrast, the TEQs of PCDFs were not associated with high BMI (p for trend = 0.56) or low HDL (p for trend = 0.12).

Table 6.

Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of the prevalence of each component of metabolic syndrome by quartiles of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs and total TEQs (quartile 1 is the referent).

Component Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 p for trend
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
 PCDDs 1.5 (0.97–2.2) 1.5 (0.93–2.3) 1.5 (0.91–2.4) 0.30
 PCDFs 1.3 (0.85–2.0) 1.5 (0.97–2.4) 1.3 (0.79–2.2) 0.56
 DL-PCBs 1.7 (1.1–2.6) 1.8 (1.1–3.0) 2.6 (1.5–4.7) < 0.01
 Total TEQs 1.3 (0.86–2.1) 1.9 (1.2–3.1) 1.9 (1.1–3.3) 0.07

Blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or a history of physician-diagnosed hypertension
 PCDDs 0.99 (0.68–1.4) 1.0 (0.70–1.6) 1.6 (1.0–2.5) 0.01
 PCDFs 1.3 (0.92–2.0) 1.6 (1.1–2.4) 1.9 (1.2–3.0) < 0.01
 DL-PCBs 1.0 (0.71–1.6) 1.1 (0.69–1.7) 1.9 (1.1–3.1) < 0.01
 Total TEQs 1.3 (0.86–1.9) 1.2 (0.81–1.9) 1.9 (1.1–3.1) < 0.01

Triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL
 PCDDs 2.1 (1.3–3.5) 2.1 (1.2–3.7) 2.7 (1.5–4.8) < 0.01
 PCDFs 1.5 (0.87–2.5) 2.1 (1.2–3.6) 2.2 (1.2–4.1) 0.02
 DL-PCBs 2.4 (1.4–4.3) 3.4 (1.8–6.6) 5.2 (2.6–11) < 0.01
 Total TEQs 2.0 (1.1–3.5) 3.0 (1.6–5.6) 3.8 (1.9–7.5) < 0.01

HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL in males or 50 mg/dL in females
 PCDDs 1.5 (0.83–2.8) 1.8 (0.93–3.4) 3.2 (1.7–6.4) < 0.01
 PCDFs 1.5 (0.85–2.8) 2.0 (1.0–3.7) 1.9 (0.98–4.0) 0.12
 DL-PCBs 1.1 (0.58–1.9) 1.9 (0.98–3.8) 2.1 (0.98–4.5) 0.06
 Total TEQs 1.3 (0.72–2.5) 1.9 (0.97–3.8) 2.7 (1.3–5.9) < 0.01

HbA1c ≥ 5.6% or a history of physician-diagnosed diabetes
 PCDDs 2.7 (1.2–6.6) 3.5 (1.6–8.7) 4.6 (2.0–12) < 0.01
 PCDFs 2.1 (0.93–5.2) 3.9 (1.8–9.6) 3.2 (1.4–8.3) 0.06
 DL-PCBs 2.1 (0.90–5.3) 3.1 (1.3–8.0) 8.0 (3.2–22) < 0.01
 Total TEQs 3.3 (1.3–10) 4.5 (1.7–14) 8.6 (3.1–28) < 0.01

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking habit, drinking habit, regional block, residential area, and survey year (model df = 19).

Table 7 lists the adjusted associations of concentrations of selected congeners with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. We found significant trends for associations with metabolic syndrome for 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Hp-CDD, OCDD, 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, PCB-126, PCB-105, PCB-114, PCB-118, PCB-123, and PCB-167. The highest quartiles of PCB-126 and PCB-105 had adjusted ORs (95%-CI) of 9.1-(4.1–21) and 7.3-(3.4–17), respectively, compared with the respective referents.

Table 7.

Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome by quartiles of the concentrations of the selected congeners (Q1 = referent).

Congener Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 p for trend
PCDDs
 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 2.8 (1.2–8.4) 2.0 (0.77–6.4) 3.7 (1.4–12) 0.04
 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 2.5 (1.3–5.6) 3.0 (1.4–6.7) 3.6 (1.7–8.2) < 0.01
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2.1 (1.1–3.8) 3.0 (1.7–5.5) 4.5 (2.4–8.6) < 0.01
 OCDD 1.9 (1.1–3.5) 3.0 (1.7–5.5) 3.7 (2.0–6.9) < 0.01

PCDFs
 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 3.8 (1.7–9.8) 4.1 (1.8–11) 5.3 (2.2–14) < 0.01
 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.2 (0.40–3.7) 2.9 (1.3–7.9) 2.8 (1.2–8.0) 0.06

PCBs
 PCB-126 2.5 (1.1–5.6) 4.9 (2.4–11) 9.1 (4.1–21) < 0.01
 PCB-169 1.7 (0.78–4.2) 1.7 (0.79–4.2) 1.4 (0.60–3.7) 0.73
 PCB-105 1.9 (0.87–4.2) 4.6 (2.3–9.9) 7.3 (3.4–17) < 0.01
 PCB-114 3.1 (1.5–7.1) 3.6 (1.6–8.7) 6.4 (2.7–17) < 0.01
 PCB-118 2.5 (1.3–5.3) 3.8 (1.8–8.3) 6.5 (3.0–15) < 0.01
 PCB-123 1.8 (0.90–3.7) 3.4 (1.7–6.9) 5.9 (2.8–13) < 0.01
 PCB-156 1.5 (0.76–3.2) 1.7 (0.78–3.7) 2.0 (0.84–4.9) 0.23
 PCB-157 1.3 (0.65–2.5) 1.1 (0.51–2.3) 1.2 (0.54–2.8) 0.81
 PCB-167 2.3 (1.1–4.8) 2.7 (1.3–6.1) 4.1 (1.8–9.7) < 0.01
 PCB-189 0.69 (0.34–1.4) 1.1 (0.54–2.3) 0.98 (0.42–2.3) 0.79

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking habit, drinking habit, regional block, residential area, and survey year (model df = 19).

Discussion

Several studies of veterans exposed to high levels of dioxins have suggested that one of the plausible diseases associated with dioxins is type 2 diabetes (Henriksen et al. 1997; Michalek et al. 1999). This association is supported by similar epidemiologic studies in subjects exposed to high levels of dioxins in Seveso, Italy (Pesatori et al. 2003), and Korean Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange (Kim et al. 2003). However, a causal association of dioxins or other POPs with diabetes is far from established. Recently, low levels of exposure to dioxins were reported to be associated with increased risk of diabetes (Lee et al. 2006), and additionally with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (Lee et al. 2007), in the U.S. population in the 1999–2002 NHANES. Metabolic syndrome has been increasing in Asian countries, including Japan, with the Westernization of lifestyle. We studied whether associations similar to those found in the U.S. population exist among the Japanese population. Lee et al. (2007) investigated the associations between some POPs and metabolic syndrome among nondiabetic subjects. However, excluding diabetic subjects could result in a sample less representative of general inhabitants. Therefore, in the present study we examined the associations both including and excluding the diabetic subjects.

We found that all of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs and total TEQs had significant nonadjusted and adjusted associations with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. The highest quartile of total TEQs had a high adjusted OR of 5.3. Analyses of each component of metabolic syndrome indicated that all of the TEQs of PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs and total TEQs were associated with high blood pressure and elevated triglycerides. The TEQs of PCDDs and DL-PCBs and total TEQs showed significant trends for associations with high HbA1c. In particular, the highest quartiles of DL-PCB TEQs and total TEQs had high adjusted ORs of 8.0 and 8.6, respectively, in the prevalence of high HbA1c. Also, the DL-PCB TEQs and total TEQs were associated with all five components of metabolic syndrome, and the ORs in the highest quartile of the TEQ of DL-PCBs in four of the five components were higher than those for PCDDs or PCDFs. From these findings, of the five components of metabolic syndrome, high blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, and glucose intolerance may be most closely associated with these pollutants, particularly with DL-PCBs. In contrast, high BMI was not associated with TEQs except for DL-PCBs. Of the five components, high BMI might be the least associated with exposure to these pollutants.

TEQ-based analyses can be justified if the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor is the mechanism involved. PCDDs/PCDFs and DL-PCBs that have been assigned a TEF are known to exhibit various biological and toxic actions through binding with Ah receptors, so we conducted the TEQ-based analyses. However, Lee et al. (2007) recently reported that the background exposure to some POPs may be closely related to metabolic syndrome, with different POPs related to different metabolic syndrome traits. To examine whether Ah-receptor–mediated mechanisms of the examined pollutants are critical in their link to metabolic syndrome, we further analyzed the associations of the concentration of each congener separately with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. We found that 12 of the selected 16 congeners, widely distributed among PCDDs, PCDFs, and DL-PCBs, had trends for association with metabolic syndrome. In particular, the highest quartiles of PCB-126 and PCB-105 had adjusted ORs of 9.1 and 7.3, respectively, a finding consistent with that of the TEQ-based analyses.

We found associations of PCDD and PCDF TEQs with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome; in contrast, Lee et al. (2007) found no such associations. These associations in our TEQ-based analyses agreed with the results of our congener-specific analyses. Lee et al. (2007) also reported that the risk of metabolic syndrome was highest in the third quartile and then plateaued in the case of DL-PCBs, whereas we found a significant trend for the association between the TEQ of DL-PCBs and metabolic syndrome. This association in our study persisted or strengthened when diabetic subjects were excluded from the analyses. Although we could not clearly explain this discrepancy between the findings of Lee et al. (2007) and ours, the difference in prevalence of metabolic syndrome (24.3% and 9.3%, respectively, when excluding diabetic subjects) might influence this discrepancy.

The associations observed in this cross-sectional study should be carefully interpreted regarding cause–effect relations. For diabetic subjects, slower elimination of dioxins was not supported in a study on Vietnam veterans (Michalek et al. 2003), in which no difference in TCDD half-life was reported between diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. However, for subjects with metabolic syndrome, elimination half-life of dioxins has not been investigated. Some previous studies have shown that individuals with higher BMI, which was one component of metabolic syndrome in our study, have reduced dioxin clearance (Blanck et al. 2000; Flesch-Janys et al. 1996). Therefore, suffering from metabolic syndrome might impair the metabolism or the excretion of these pollutants and might lead to a greater accumulation in the body. Further prospective studies will be needed to clarify this causality.

Metabolic syndrome has recently become prevalent, whereas the body burden levels of PCDDs/PCDFs and DL-PCBs have a decreasing trend (Konishi et al. 2001; Porta 2006; Wittsiepe et al. 2000). Therefore, the dose–response relations of the TEQs or the concentrations of these pollutants in the blood with metabolic syndrome observed in this study or another (Lee et al. 2007) seem to conflict. One possible explanation is that toxic actions of these pollutants may be strengthened in obesity. This explanation is supported by a recent molecular epidemiologic study of diabetogenic effects of dioxin exposure, which showed an inverse correlation between the ratio of GLUT4 to nuclear factor kappa B and serum dioxin concentrations in obesity and family history of diabetes (Fujiyoshi et al. 2006). To clarify this hypothesis in our data, we further analyzed the associations between the concentrations of these pollutants and the prevalence of each component of metabolic syndrome except BMI after stratifying by BMI (≥ 25 kg/m2 and < 25 kg/m2). However, the associations did not show expected tendencies (data not shown), so the reliability of this hypothesis should be further verified. Another explanation is that PCDDs/PCDFs or DL-PCBs contribute to the occurrence of metabolic syndrome, but other factors including the Westernization of lifestyle also affect the occurrence of metabolic syndrome.

The strength of the present study is that our subjects represent the general population of Japan. This study has several limitations. First, as stated above, the findings in this study should be interpreted with caution regarding cause–effect relationships because of the cross-sectional design. Second, we diagnosed metabolic syndrome using a criterion of BMI instead of waist circumference, but BMI may not rigorously reflect central obesity. Similarly, we used HbA1c as a criterion instead of fasting serum glucose because we did not have data on fasting serum glucose.

In conclusion, this representative data among the general population of Japan showed significant associations of body burden levels of dioxins and related compounds with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Of the five components of metabolic syndrome, high blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, and glucose intolerance may be closely associated with the blood levels of these pollutants, especially with DL-PCBs. Basic studies in animals and further epidemiologic studies using longitudinal designs should be further conducted to define the mechanism and the causality between exposure to these pollutants and metabolic syndrome.

Footnotes

We performed this study under the supervision of the Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. We thank T. Kitamado and M. Hasegawa (Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan) and M. Hijiya and Y. Chisaki (IDEA Consultants, Inc.) for their cooperation and encouragement during the study. We also thank members of the committee of the “Accumulation of Dioxins in Humans”: I. Uchiyam (Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University), F. Kayama (Jichi Medical University), H. Saito (Nagasaki University), N. Suzuki (National Institute for Environment Studies), T. Sobue (National Cancer Center Research Institute), S. Tominaga (Aichi Health Promotion Foundation), H. Miyata (Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Setsunan University), M. Morita (National Institute for Environment Studies/Ehime University), C. Tohyama (Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, University of Tokyo), and S. Watanabe (National Institute of Health and Nutrition).

References

  1. Blanck HM, Marcus M, Hertzberg V, Tolbert PE, Rubin C, Henderson AK, et al. Determinants of polybrominated biphenyl serum decay among women in the Michigan PBB cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:147–152. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–1727. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flesch-Janys D, Becher H, Gurn P, Jung D, Konietzko J, Manz A, et al. Elimination of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in occupationally exposed persons. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1996;47:363–378. doi: 10.1080/009841096161708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford ES. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2745–2749. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fujiyoshi PT, Michalek JE, Matsumura F. Molecular epidemiologic evidence for diabetogenic effects of dioxin exposure in U.S. Air Force veterans of the Vietnam War. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1677–1683. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henriksen GL, Ketchum NS, Michalek JE, Swaby JA. Serum dioxin and diabetes mellitus in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand. Epidemiology. 1997;8:252–258. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199705000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson E, Shorter C, Bestervelt L, Patterson D, Needham L, Piper W, et al. Serum hormone levels in humans with low serum concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Toxicol Ind Health. 2001;17:105–112. doi: 10.1191/0748233701th096oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim JS, Lim HS, Cho SI, Cheong HK, Lim MK. Impact of Agent Orange exposure among Korean Vietnam veterans. Ind Health. 2003;41:149–157. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.41.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ko GT, Cockram CS, Chow CC, Yeung V, Chan WB, So WY, et al. High prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Hong Kong Chinese—comparison of three diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;69:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Konishi Y, Kuwabara K, Hori S. Continuous surveillance of organochlorine compounds in human breast milk from 1972 to 1998 in Osaka, Japan. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;40:571–578. doi: 10.1007/s002440010212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002;288:2709–2716. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee DH, Lee IK, Porta M, Steffes M, Jacobs DR., Jr Relationship between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among non-diabetic adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. Diabetologia. 2007;50:1841–1851. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0755-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee DH, Lee IK, Song K, Steffes M, Toscano W, Baker BA, et al. A strong dose–response relation between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: results from the National Health and Examination Survey 1999–2002. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1638–1644. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindström G, Hooper K, Petreas M, Stephens R, Gilman A. Workshop on perinatal exposure to dioxin-like compounds. V. Summary. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(suppl 2):135–142. doi: 10.1289/ehp.103-1518837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lorenzo C, Okoloise M, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM. The metabolic syndrome as predictor of type 2 diabetes: the San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3153–3159. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, Kamath TV, L’Italien GJ, Pio JR, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation. 2004;110:1245–1250. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140677.20606.0E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McNeill AM, Rosamond WD, Girman CJ, Golden SH, Schmidt MI, East HE, et al. The metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:385–390. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.2.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Michalek JE, Akhtar FZ, Kiel JL. Serum dioxin, insulin, fasting glucose, and sex hormone-binding globulin in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1540–1543. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.5.5663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Michalek JE, Ketchum NS, Tripathi RC. Diabetes mellitus and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin elimination in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2003;66:211–221. doi: 10.1080/15287390306373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Dioxins and Furans Inventory [in Japanese] Tokyo: Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakamura T, Nakai K, Matsumura T, Suzuki S, Saito Y, Satoh H. Determination of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls in breast milk, maternal blood and cord blood from residents of Tohoku, Japan. Sci Total Environ. 2008;394:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakanishi N, Suzuki K, Tatara K. Clustered features of the metabolic syndrome and the risk for increased aortic pulse wave velocity in middle-aged Japanese men. Angiology. 2003;54:551–559. doi: 10.1177/000331970305400504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. NCEP ATP-III (National Cholesterol Education Program) Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. [[accessed 23 February 2009]];Circulation. 2002 106:3143–3421. Available: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/reprint/106/25/3143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pesatori AC, Consonni D, Bachetti S, Zocchetti C, Bonzini M, Baccarelli A, et al. Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in the population exposed to dioxin after the “Seveso Accident”. Ind Health. 2003;41:127–138. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.41.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Porta M. Persistent organic pollutants and the burden of diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:558–559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69174-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rohlfing CL, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, England JD, Madsen R, Harris MI, et al. Use of GHb (HbA1c) in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:187–191. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sattar N, Gaw A, Scherbakova O, Ford I, O’Reilly DSJ, Haffner SM, et al. Metabolic syndrome with and without C-reactive protein as a predictor of coronary heart disease and diabetes in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation. 2003;108:414–419. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080897.52664.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tan CE, Ma S, Wai D, Chew SK, Tai ES. Can we apply the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel definition of the metabolic syndrome to Asians? Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1182–1186. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Uemura H, Arisawa K, Hiyoshi M, Satoh H, Sumiyoshi Y, Morinaga K, et al. Associations of environmental exposure to dioxins with prevalent diabetes among general inhabitants in Japan. Environ Res. 2008;108:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld AT, Brunstrom B, Cook P, Feeley M, et al. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106:775–792. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weisglas-Kuperus N. Neurodevelopmental, immunological and endocrinological indices of perinatal human exposure to PCBs and dioxins. Chemosphere. 1998;37:1845–1853. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(98)00250-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wittsiepe J, Schrey P, Ewers U, Selenka F, Wilhelm M. Decrease of PCDD/F levels in human blood from Germany over the past ten years (1989–1998) Chemosphere. 2000;40:1103–1109. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES