Abstract
Protein phosphorylation is a major mode of regulation of metabolism, gene expression and cell architecture. In chloroplasts, reversible phosphorylation of proteins is known to regulate a number of prominent processes, for instance photosynthesis, gene expression and starch metabolism. The complements of the involved chloroplast protein kinases (cpPKs) and phosphatases (cpPPs) are largely unknown, except 6 proteins (4 cpPKs and 2 cpPPs) which have been experimentally identified so far. We employed combinations of programs predicting N-terminal chloroplast transit peptides (cTPs) to identify 45 tentative cpPKs and 21 tentative cpPPs. However, test sets of 9 tentative cpPKs and 13 tentative cpPPs contain only 2 and 7 genuine cpPKs and cpPPs, respectively, based on experimental subcellular localization of their N-termini fused to the reporter protein RFP. Taken together, the set of enzymes known to be involved in the reversible phosphorylation of chloroplast proteins in A. thaliana comprises altogether now 6 cpPKs and 9 cpPPs, the function of which needs to be determined in future by functional genomics approaches. This includes the calcium-regulated PK CIPK13 which we found to be located in the chloroplast, indicating that calcium-dependent signal transduction pathways also operate in this organelle.
Key Words: Arabidopsis thaliana, chloroplast, chloroplast transit peptide, protein kinase, protein phosphatase, protein phosphorylation, proteomics.
INTRODUCTION
Phosphorylation of amino acid side chains can modulate the conformation, activity, localization and stability of proteins, and around one-third of all eukaryotic proteins are thought to be reversibly phosphorylated [1]. Therefore, protein phosphorylation plays a central role in regulating cellular functions, particularly in signal transduction pathways (reviewed in: [2, 3]). The reversible phosphorylation of proteins involves two types of enzymes: protein kinases (PKs) and phosphatases (PPs). In signaling pathways, PKs can be arranged in cascades, allowing amplification, feedback, cross-talk and branching in the transduction of the signal [2, 4, 5].
Various types of PKs and PPs exist in plants, classified according to the presence of domains in addition to the catalytic domain mediating (de)phosphorylation (e.g. receptor kinases), their regulation (e.g. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases) or their amino acid substrate (e.g. serine/threonine, tyrosine or histidine kinases) [4, 6-15]. The complete genome sequence of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana allowed to survey comprehensively its total complement of PKs and PPs, resulting in more than 800 PKs [16] and 112 PPs [9] so far. As of early 2008, in the PlantsP [17] and TAIR [18, 19] databases, 970 PKs and 217 PPs were listed for A. thaliana.
The chloroplast, the characteristic organelle of green algae and plants, is thought to contain around 3000 different proteins in the model plant species A. thaliana [20, 21]. Among those, a number is reversibly phosphorylated including proteins involved in the photosynthetic light reaction [22, 23], starch metabolism [24] and transcription [25, 26]. However, only few chloroplast PKs (cpPKs) and PPs (cpPPs) have been experimentally identified in A. thaliana and other flowering plants so far. Here we will summarize current knowledge on Arabidopsis cpPKs and cpPPs and present genomic approaches for the systematic identification and characterization of the chloroplast complement of PKs and PPs.
EXPERIMENTALLY CHARACTERIZED cpPKs AND cpPPs
The reversible phosphorylation of thylakoid proteins has been associated with the regulation of the migration between the photosystems of LHCII, the light-harvesting complex of photosystem II (PSII) [27, 28], as well as with the turnover of PSII proteins [29, 30]. Based on sequence homology to the cpPK Stt7, isolated from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the two A. thaliana cpPKs STN7 and STN8 have been identified [31] and their thylakoid localization has been experimentally shown [32, 33] (Table 1). The analysis of loss-of-function mutants showed that STN7 is required for LHCII phosphorylation and state transitions [32, 33], whereas STN8 is necessary for the reversible phosphorylation of the PSII proteins D1, D2, CP43, PSII-H and CP29 [33, 34]. Further biochemical analyses will be required to clarify whether STN7 and STN8 directly phosphorylate photosynthetic proteins, or whether they operate in phosphorylation cascades involving additional thylakoid PKs. Additional members of such phosphorylation cascades might be represented by the so-called thylakoid-associated PKs TAK1, 2 and 3 [35, 36] (Table 1). However, in contrast to STN7 and STN8 these proteins lack a chloroplast transit peptide (cTP).
Table 1.
Experimentally Identified cpPKs and cpPPs in A. thaliana
Accession Number | Designation | Group a | Prediction Ratio | Experimental Approach | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
cpPKs | |||||
At1g68830 | STN7 | none b | 9/9 | RFP/GFP fusion, in-vitro import, immunolocalization | [32, 33] |
At5g01920 | STN8 | none b | 8/9 | RFP fusion, | [33, 34] |
At4g02630 | TAK1 | 1.6.3 | 1/9 | Immunolocalisation,in-vitro import c | [35, 36] |
At1g01540 | TAK2 | 1.6.3 | 4/9 | Sequence homology based d | |
At4g01330 | TAK3 | 1.6.3 | 3/9 | ||
At2g23070 | cpCK2α | 4.5.3 | 6/9 | GFP fusion | [38] |
At3g44610 | PK-like protein | 4.2.6 | 5/9 | proteomics | [40] |
At5g20930 | TSL (TOUSLED) | none b | 4/9 | ||
At1g76370 | Putative PK | 1.2.2 | 3/9 | [39] | |
cpPPs | |||||
At3g52180 | DSP4/SEX4 | 6.2 | 7/9 | GFP fusion, immunolocalization | [41-43] |
At4g21210 | AtRP1 | 6.5 | 9/9 | GFP fusion | [44] |
Predictions of chloroplast targeting were performed with the following algorithms: Predotar [49], TargetP [50], Protein Prowler [51], AAIndexLOC [52], PredSL [53], SLP-Local [54], WoLF PSORT [55], MultiLOC [56] and PCLR [57]. Several combinations were tried, in which a PK was considered to be chloroplast located when predicted by at least n (‘n of 9’) of the nine predictors, with n ranging from 1 to 9.
according to PlantsP Kinase and Phosphatase database (http://plantsp.genomics.purdue.edu/html/families.html);
not classified yet;
TAK1 does not posses a cleavable cTP;
chloroplast location was not reproducible (Bonardi, Pesaresi, Becker, Schleiff, Leister, unpublished data).
The chloroplast α subunit of casein kinase 2, cpCK2α, has been originally identified in mustard (Sinapis alba L.). cpCK2α phosphorylates in vitro components of the plastid transcription apparatus [37] and the corresponding orthologue has been also detected in chloroplasts of A. thaliana [38] (Table 1). Three further cpPKs have been tentatively identified during two proteomic studies [39, 40] but their localization has not been confirmed by independent approaches yet (Table 1).
Only two cpPPs have been identified so far. The dual-specificity protein phosphatase DSP/SEX4 can bind to starch granules and is involved in the regulation of starch metabolism [41-43]. AtRP1 exhibits bifunctional PK/PP properties and is capable of (de)phosphorylation of the regulatory threonine residue of Arabidopsis pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK) [44].
GENOME-WIDE PREDICTION OF cpPKs AND cpPPs
The vast majority of chloroplast proteins are targeted to the organelle by their N-terminal signal sequences, the chloroplast transit peptide (cTP), and imported via the Tic/Toc translocon [45]. For the prediction of cTPs various algorithms have been developed, and the accuracy of prediction can be further improved by combining several predictors. Thus, the specificity of combinatorial cTP prediction increases with the number of predictors used; as expected, this gain in specificity occurs at the expense of sensitivity [21]. We have employed nine different algorithms for cTP prediction and all the four cTP-containing cpPKs and cpPPs, which were unambiguously identified experimentally, namely STN7, STN8, cpCK2α, AtRP1 and DSP4/SEX4, were correctly predicted by at least 6 of the 9 predictors (Table 1). Applying the “6 of the 9” predictor combination to the entire complement of 970 PKs and 217 PPs encoded in the nuclear genome of A. thaliana, 45 PKs and 21 PPs should contain a cTP (Table 2). Remarkably, among the cpPKs predicted by the 6/9 approach, transmembrane (TM)-receptor PKs and related PKs are relatively under-represented, whereas non-TM PKs are clearly over-represented (Table 2). Among the predicted cpPPs, serine/threonine phosphatases are under-represented but PP 2C-type PPs predominate (Table 2).
Table 2.
Number of Predicted cpPKs and cpPPs in A. thaliana
Group | Definition | Entire Genome | Predicted cpPKs/cpPPs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/9 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 6/9 | 7/9 | 8/9 | 9/9 | |||
PKs | |||||||||||
1 | Transmembrane (TM) receptor and related non-TM | 558 | 263 | 104 | 58 | 35 | 26 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 4 |
2 | ATN1/CTR1/EDR1/GmPK6- like | 52 | 28 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | Casein kinase I | 16 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | Non-TM | 278 | 159 | 82 | 62 | 45 | 36 | 23 | 11 | 4 | 1 |
5 | other | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- | not classified yet | 62 | 34 | 22 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
total | 970 | 491 | 222 | 141 | 95 | 72 | 45 | 28 | 15 | 7 | |
PPs | |||||||||||
6.1 | Ser/Thr | 94 | 38 | 16 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
6.2 | Dual-specific | 23 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
6.3 | PP 2C-type | 89 | 64 | 38 | 27 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 5 |
6.4 | Tyr | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
6.5 | other | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
total | 217 | 122 | 68 | 46 | 35 | 28 | 21 | 19 | 13 | 7 |
PK/PP identifiers and classifications were retrieved from the PlantsP database (http://plantsp.genomics.purdue.edu) and protein sequences from TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/; genome release 7). Prediction of cTPs was performed as described in Table 1. Ser, serine; Thr, threonine; Tyr, tyrosine.
EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A REPRESENTATIVE SET OF PREDICTED cpPKs AND cpPPs
How many of the tentative cpPKs and cpPPs found by the 6/9 approach are truly located in the chloroplast? To answer this question, the N-terminal regions of the proteins containing the tentative cTPs were fused to the red-fluorescent protein (RFP) [46] and transfected into Arabidopsis protoplasts. Comparison of the position of signals from the RFP fusions and from chlorophyll autofluorescence allowed to validate the chloroplast location of the tentative cpPPs and cpPKs (Fig. 1). Of the 9 predicted cpPKs tested, only two proteins actually exhibited a chloroplast location, notably At1g51170 and At2g34180 both belonging to class 4 of non-TM PKs (Table 3). Interestingly, At2g34180 is annotated as “CBL (calcineurin B-like calcium sensor) protein interacting protein kinase 13” (CIPK13) and contains a NAF domain thought to mediate the interaction with CBL proteins (Table 4). This supports the view that calcium-dependent signal transduction pathways also operate in chloroplasts. This is in line with the recent finding of calcium regulation of chloroplast protein translocation [47, 48].
Fig. (1).
Fluorescence micrographs of A. thaliana protoplasts transfected with N-terminal fusions of the predicted transit peptides of the respective cpPKs (a) and cpPPs (b) to dsRED. The pictures are presented in false color with RFP fluorescence shown in red and chlorophyll autofluorescence in green. The predictor combinations are provided above each panel and chloroplast-located proteins are indicated in bold.
Table 3.
In-Vivo Localisation of RFP-Fusion Proteins in A. thaliana Protoplasts
Accession Number | Class | Prediction Ratio | Localization of RFP-Fusion |
---|---|---|---|
cpPKs | |||
At2g17220 | 1 | 9/9 | elsewhere |
At1g51170 | 4 | 8/9 | cp |
At2g31500 | 4 | 8/9 | probably mt |
At1g68690 | 1 | 7/9 | cyt |
At3g24550 | 1 | 7/9 | cyt a |
At3g27580 | 4 | 7/9 | elsewhere |
At5g38560 | 1 | 7/9 | cyt a |
At2g34180 | 4 | 6/9 | cp |
At4g36950 | 4 | 6/9 | elsewhere |
cpPPs | |||
At1g07160 | 6.3 | 9/9 | cp |
At2g30020 | 6.3 | 9/9 | cp |
At4g33500 | 6.3 | 9/9 | cp |
At1g67820 | 6.3 | 8/9 | cp |
At2g30170 | 6.3 | 8/9 | cp |
At3g02750 | 6.3 | 8/9 | cyt |
At3g10940 | 6.2 | 8/9 | cp |
At5g66720 | 6.3 | 8/9 | probably cyt + mt |
At1g71860 | 6.4 | 7/9 | n [58] |
At2g35350 | 6.3 | 7/9 | cyt |
At4g03415 | 6.3 | 7/9 | cp |
At5g36250 | 6.3 | 7/9 | mt |
At3g23610 | 6.2 | 6/9 | cyt |
Table 4.
Characteristics of Novel cpPKs and cpPPs
Accession Number | MWa | IPa | Domain in Addition to Kinase/Phosphatase Domain | Expression b |
---|---|---|---|---|
cpPKs | ||||
At1g51170 | 45.7 | 8.8221 | - | At least 3-fold upregulated in response to auxin |
At2g34180 (CIPK13, SnRK3.7) | 56.7 | 8.294 | NAF domain (necessary and sufficient to mediate interaction with calcineurin B-like calcium sensor proteins) | expressed in roots |
cpPPs | ||||
At1g07160 | 40.7 | 7.3753 | - | At least 3-fold upregulated in response to auxin and H2O2 |
At2g30020 | 42.4 | 7.9156 | - | More than 2-fold upregulated in response to wounding and P. syringae treatment |
At4g33500 | 78.9 | 4.375 | - | 1.5-fold upregulated in response to heat and light + low CO2; 1.5-fold downregulated in response to cold |
At1g67820 | 49.4 | 8.3146 | - | 2-fold upregulated in response to low nitrate |
At2g30170 | 32.3 | 4.9442 | - | 1.5-fold upregulated in response to hypoxia and zeatin |
At3g10940 | 32.1 | 8.6247 | - | 1.5-fold upregulated in response to heat and light + low CO2; 2-fold downregulated in response to cold |
At4g03415 | 50.3 | 6.1037 | - | Not listed in GENEVESTIGATOR |
calculated molecular weight (MW) in kDa and isolelectric point (IP) according to TAIR database (v7),
according to GENEVESTIGATOR database [62].
In contrast to cpPKs, a large fraction of tentative cpPPs are truly located in the chloroplast; thus, for 7 of the 13 tentative cpPPs a chloroplast location could be confirmed (Table 3). Taken together, identification of cpPKs by cTP prediction is very error-prone, whereas cpPPs could be identified in a relatively reliable way. One can only speculate why the cTP prediction produced so many false positive results for PKs. A possible explanation is that the kinase domain of the proteins interferes with cTP prediction; at least in one case (At4g36950) the falsely predicted cTP overlapped with the kinase domain.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Around 10% of the nuclear genes in Arabidopsis are estimated to encode chloroplast proteins [20]. If this extrapolation is extended to major protein families such as protein kinases and phosphatases, more than 100 cpPKs and 20 cpPPs should operate in the photosynthetic organelle. Although our genomic approach more than doubled the set of known enzymes involved in reversible chloroplast protein phosphorylation, the current number of 6 confirmed cpPKs and 9 cpPPs is still much smaller than the one based on the genome-wide extrapolation described above and also much smaller than expected based on the cTP predictions of PKs and PPs (see Table 2).
Although the chloroplast -- as an endosymbiotic organelle derived from a prokaryotic ancestor -- provided the eukaryotic cell with the two-component receptor family (which is related to the bacterial two-component histidine kinase receptors), it is tempting to speculate that the photosynthetic organelle might have failed to quantitatively adopt in return the eukaryotic concept of reversible protein phosphorylation at serine and threonine residues. This could mean that the actual number of PKs and PPs in the chloroplast is markedly lower than expected. Nevertheless, only approaches combining bioinformatic prediction and experimental validation of subcellular location of proteins as outlined in this work will systematically contribute to identify the entire complement of chloroplast protein kinases and phosphatases.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for funding (LE 1265/3 [AFGN] and SFB TR1, TP A10).
REFERENCES
- 1.Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, Mann M. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell. 2006;127:635–648. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hunter T. Protein kinases and phosphatases: the yin and yang of protein phosphorylation and signaling. Cell. 1995;80:225–236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90405-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kennelly PJ. Protein kinases and protein phosphatases in prokaryotes: a genomic perspective. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002;206:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb10978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jonak C, Okresz L, Bogre L, Hirt H. Complexity, cross talk and integration of plant MAP kinase signalling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002;5:415–424. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00285-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schenk PW, Snaar-Jagalska BE. Signal perception and transduction: the role of protein kinases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1449:1–24. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(98)00178-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.DeLong A. Switching the flip: protein phosphatase roles in signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006;9:470–477. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Denu JM, Stuckey JA, Saper MA, Dixon JE. Form and function in protein dephosphorylation. Cell. 1996;87:361–364. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81356-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Farkas I, Dombradi V, Miskei M, Szabados L, Koncz C. Arabidopsis PPP family of serine/threonine phosphatases. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12:169–176. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kerk D, Bulgrien J, Smith DW, Barsam B, Veretnik S, Gribskov M. The complement of protein phosphatase catalytic subunits encoded in the genome of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:908–925. doi: 10.1104/pp.004002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Luan S. Protein phosphatases in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003;54:63–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schweighofer A, Hirt H, Meskiene I. Plant PP2C phosphatases: emerging functions in stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stone JM, Walker JC. Plant protein kinase families and signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 1995;108:451–457. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Sci STKE 2001. 2001;RE22 doi: 10.1126/stke.2001.113.re22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Urao T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Plant histidine kinases: an emerging picture of two-component signal transduction in hormone and environmental responses. Sci STKE. 2001;2001:RE18. doi: 10.1126/stke.2001.109.re18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang S, Klessig DF. MAPK cascades in plant defense signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:520–527. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02103-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408:796–815. doi: 10.1038/35048692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tchieu JH, Fana F, Fink JL, Harper J, Nair TM, Niedner RH, Smith DW, Steube K, Tam TM, Veretnik S, Wang D, Gribskov M. The PlantsP and PlantsT Functional Genomics Databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:342–344. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Poole RL. The TAIR Database. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007;406:179–212. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-535-0_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Garcia-Hernandez M, Foerster H, Li D, Meyer T, Muller R, Ploetz L, Radenbaugh A, Singh S, Swing V, Tissier C, Zhang P, Huala E. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D1009–1014. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leister D. Chloroplast research in the genomic age. Trends Genet. 2003;19:47–56. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)00003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Richly E, Leister D. An improved prediction of chloroplast proteins reveals diversities and commonalities in the chloroplast proteomes of Arabidopsis and rice. Gene. 2004;329:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vener AV. Environmentally modulated phosphorylation and dynamics of proteins in photosynthetic membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1767:449–457. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vener AV, Ohad I, Andersson B. Protein phosphorylation and redox sensing in chloroplast thylakoids. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998;1:217–223. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(98)80107-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tetlow IJ, Wait R, Lu Z, Akkasaeng R, Bowsher CG, Esposito S, Kosar-Hashemi B, Morell MK, Emes MJ. Protein phosphorylation in amyloplasts regulates starch branching enzyme activity and protein-protein interactions. Plant Cell. 2004;16:694–708. doi: 10.1105/tpc.017400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baginsky S, Tiller K, Link G. Transcription factor phosphorylation by a protein kinase associated with chloroplast RNA polymerase from mustard (Sinapis alba) Plant Mol. Biol. 1997;34:181–189. doi: 10.1023/a:1005802909902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kleffmann T, von Zychlinski A, Russenberger D, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Gehrig P, Gruissem W, Baginsky S. Proteome dynamics during plastid differentiation in rice. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:912–923. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.090738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haldrup A, Jensen PE, Lunde C, Scheller HV. Balance of power: a view of the mechanism of photosynthetic state transitions. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:301–305. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(01)01953-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wollman FA. State transitions reveal the dynamics and flexibility of the photosynthetic apparatus. EMBO J. 2001;20:3623–3630. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.14.3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rintamäki E, Kettunen R, Aro EM. Differential D1 dephosphorylation in functional and photodamaged photosystem II centers. Dephosphorylation is a prerequisite for degradation of damaged D1. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:14870–14875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.25.14870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rintamäki E, Salonen M, Suoranta UM, Carlberg I, Andersson B, Aro EM. Phosphorylation of light-harvesting complex II and photosystem II core proteins shows different irradiance-dependent regulation in vivo. Application of phosphothreonine antibodies to analysis of thylakoid phosphoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:30476–30482. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Depege N, Bellafiore S, Rochaix JD. Role of chloroplast protein kinase Stt7 in LHCII phosphorylation and state transition in Chlamydomonas. Science. 2003;299:1572–1575. doi: 10.1126/science.1081397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bellafiore S, Barneche F, Peltier G, Rochaix JD. State transitions and light adaptation require chloroplast thylakoid protein kinase STN7. Nature. 2005;433:892–895. doi: 10.1038/nature03286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bonardi V, Pesaresi P, Becker T, Schleiff E, Wagner R, Pfannschmidt T, Jahns P, Leister D. Photosystem II core phosphorylation and photosynthetic acclimation require two different protein kinases. Nature. 2005;437:1179–1182. doi: 10.1038/nature04016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vainonen JP, Hansson M, Vener AV. STN8 protein kinase in Arabidopsis thaliana is specific in phosphorylation of photosystem II core proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33679–33686. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505729200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Snyders S, Kohorn BD. TAKs, thylakoid membrane protein kinases associated with energy transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:9137–9140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.14.9137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Snyders S, Kohorn BD. Disruption of thylakoid-associated kinase 1 leads to alteration of light harvesting in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:32169–32176. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102539200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ogrzewalla K, Piotrowski M, Reinbothe S, Link G. The plastid transcription kinase from mustard (Sinapis alba L.). A nuclear-encoded CK2-type chloroplast enzyme with redox-sensitive function. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002;269:3329–3337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Salinas P, Fuentes D, Vidal E, Jordana X, Echeverria M, Holuigue L. An extensive survey of CK2 alpha and beta subunits in Arabidopsis: multiple isoforms exhibit differential subcellular localization. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;47:1295–1308. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcj100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Froehlich JE, Wilkerson CG, Ray WK, McAndrew RS, Osteryoung KW, Gage DA, Phinney BS. Proteomic study of the Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplastic envelope membrane utilizing alternatives to traditional two-dimensional electrophoresis. J. Proteome Res. 2003;2:413–425. doi: 10.1021/pr034025j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kleffmann T, Russenberger D, von Zychlinski A, Christopher W, Sjolander K, Gruissem W, Baginsky S. The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sokolov LN, Dominguez-Solis JR, Allary AL, Buchanan BB, Luan S. A redox-regulated chloroplast protein phosphatase binds to starch diurnally and functions in its accumulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:9732–9737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603329103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kerk D, Conley TR, Rodriguez FA, Tran HT, Nimick M, Muench DG, Moorhead GB. A chloroplast-localized dual-specificity protein phosphatase in Arabidopsis contains a phylogenetically dispersed and ancient carbohydrate-binding domain, which binds the polysaccharide starch. Plant J. 2006;46:400–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Niittyla T, Comparot-Moss S, Lue WL, Messerli G, Trevisan M, Seymour MD, Gatehouse JA, Villadsen D, Smith SM, Chen J, Zeeman SC, Smith AM. Similar protein phosphatases control starch metabolism in plants and glycogen metabolism in mammals. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:11815–11818. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600519200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chastain CJ, Xu W, Parsley K, Sarath G, Hibberd JM, Chollet R. The pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase regulatory proteins of Arabidopsis possess a novel, unprecedented Ser/Thr protein kinase primary structure. Plant J. 2008;53:854–863. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Soll J, Schleiff E. Protein import into chloroplasts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;5:198–208. doi: 10.1038/nrm1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jach G, Binot E, Frings S, Luxa K, Schell J. Use of red fluorescent protein from Discosoma sp. (dsRED) as a reporter for plant gene expression. Plant J. 2001;28:483–491. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chigri F, Hormann F, Stamp A, Stammers DK, Bolter B, Soll J, Vothknecht UC. Calcium regulation of chloroplast protein translocation is mediated by calmodulin binding to Tic32. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:16051–16056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607150103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chigri F, Soll J, Vothknecht UC. Calcium regulation of chloroplast protein import. Plant J. 2005;42:821–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Small I, Peeters N, Legeai F, Lurin C. Predotar: A tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics. 2004;4:1581–1590. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 2000;300:1005–1016. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Boden M, Hawkins J. Prediction of subcellular localization using sequence-biased recurrent networks. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2279–2286. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tantoso E, Li KB. AAIndexLoc: predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on a new representation of sequences using amino acid indices. Amino Acids in press. 2008 doi: 10.1007/s00726-007-0616-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Petsalaki EI, Bagos PG, Litou ZI, Hamodrakas SJ. PredSL: a tool for the N-terminal sequence-based prediction of protein subcellular localization. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006;4:48–55. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(06)60016-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Matsuda S, Vert JP, Saigo H, Ueda N, Toh H, Akutsu T. A novel representation of protein sequences for prediction of subcellular location using support vector machines. Protein Sci. 2005;14:2804–2813. doi: 10.1110/ps.051597405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Horton P, Park KJ, Obayashi T, Fujita N, Harada H, Adams-Collier CJ, Nakai K. WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W585–587. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hoglund A, Donnes P, Blum T, Adolph HW, Kohlbacher O. MultiLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using N-terminal targeting sequences, sequence motifs and amino acid composition. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1158–1165. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schein AI, Kissinger JC, Ungar LH. Chloroplast transit peptide prediction: a peek inside the black box. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:E82. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.16.e82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Koroleva OA, Tomlinson ML, Leader D, Shaw P, Doonan JH. High-throughput protein localization in Arabidopsis using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of GFP-ORF fusions. Plant J. 2005;41:162–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nuhse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Large-scale analysis of in vivo phosphorylated membrane proteins by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2003;2:1234–1243. doi: 10.1074/mcp.T300006-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nuhse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane and a new phosphorylation site database. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2394–2405. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.023150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dunkley TP, Hester S, Shadforth IP, Runions J, Weimar T, Hanton SL, Griffin JL, Bessant C, Brandizzi F, Hawes C, Watson RB, Dupree P, Lilley KS. Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:6518–6523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506958103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zimmermann P, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Hennig L, Gruissem W. GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2621–2632. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]