Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.12.007

Illicit Drug Use among Women with Children in the United States: 2002–2003

Leigh Ann Simmons 1,*, Jennifer R Havens 2, Jason B Whiting 3, Jennifer L Holz 4, Henrietta Bada 5
PMCID: PMC2680130  NIHMSID: NIHMS98973  PMID: 19217001

Abstract

Objective

Given research that shows youth exposed to maternal addiction have increased rates of cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioral problems, we examined the prevalence and correlates of past year illicit drug abuse or dependence among women with children less than 18 years in the home to identify maternal risk factors.

Methods

Data were from the 2002 and 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a nationally representative sample of the U.S. civilian population. The current analysis utilized a subsample of women (N=19,300) who reported having children less than 18 years in the home. Past year abuse or dependence of cocaine, heroin, marijuana, stimulants, and hallucinogens, and non-medical use of prescription medications were assessed.

Results

The prevalence of illicit drug abuse or dependence was 1.9%. Mothers reporting drug abuse or dependence had increased odds of being unmarried, controlling for other demographics. They also were more likely to report stress, poorer health status, and meet the criteria for serious mental illness (SMI).

Conclusions

Prevention and intervention strategies should focus on developing and testing methods to screen for both risk factors associated with maternal drug abuse and actual substance abuse in primary and emergency care settings to reduce youth exposure and improve child developmental outcomes.

Keywords: substance-related disorders, maternal health services, child health services

Introduction

Exposure to parental substance use, abuse and dependence is associated with a number of adverse outcomes for children. These include poor emotional regulation and social interaction as toddlers (1), as well as the development of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder (2). Other emotional and behavioral problems that have been associated with maternal substance use include anxiety, emotional dependency, peer conflict, and social withdrawal (3). Further, parental drug use is associated with more exposure to violence within and outside the home, which has been shown to contribute to adverse psychological outcomes in adolescence, including higher rates of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (4;5). Finally, children of substance users are more likely to use substances themselves (6;7).

Several factors are associated with substance use, abuse, and dependence, especially among women. Longitudinal research has shown general self-rated health status declines with use of illicit drugs, including cocaine, opiates, and amphetamines, even after controlling for other psychosocial and biological covariates (8). In addition, stress is a strong predictor of substance use, which has been associated with both activation (9) and abnormal functioning (10) of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Further, the stress caused by chronic involvement in a drug-using lifestyle contributes to continued drug use and dependence (11). Psychiatric comorbidity is also common in individuals with substance use disorders (12), and individuals with mental and substance use comorbidities are less likely to receive mental health treatment (13). Interpersonal violence (IPV) and substance use are highly correlated. Research demonstrates women who use drugs or drink alcohol are more likely to be battered and injured (14). Likewise, women who experience IPV are more likely to be frequent substance users and have a greater number of substance disorder symptoms than women who do not experience IPV (15). Finally, previous research has demonstrated a link between receipt of welfare benefits and increased risk of illicit drug use (16;17). Literature suggests Medicaid policies make it difficult for clients to obtain substance abuse treatment services (18), and data reveal privately insured patients have double the odds of entering chemical dependency treatment than Medicaid-insured patients (19).

Given that women are more often primary caretakers of children, and given the negative effects of maternal substance use on child and adolescent outcomes, the overall aim of this study was to use a nationally representative sample to determine the prevalence and correlates of illicit substance use among mothers with children less than 18 years of age in the home. This research is important in helping public health professionals and primary care practitioners to identify children in families who may be at risk for exposure to the deleterious effects of maternal substance use, so both children and their caregivers might receive appropriate intervention.

Subjects and Methods

We analyzed data from the 2002 and 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) (20;21). The NSDUH is a nationally representative, epidemiologic survey that serves as the primary source of information on the prevalence of illicit drug, alcohol, and tobacco use in the United States. Annually data are collected from approximately 70,000 individuals age 12 years and older within the non-institutionalized, civilian population. The NSDUH utilizes an independent, multistage area probability sampling method for each state and the District of Columbia. Data are collected in person using a combination of computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) and audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI), the latter of which provides a confidential means of participating thereby minimizing reporting bias (20;21). The response rates exceeded 75% for 2002 and 2003 (79% and 77%, respectively). The total sample size for the 2002–2003 NSDUH was 109,309; however, for the current analysis, respondents only included women with children under age 18 living in the home (N = 19,300).

Dependent Variable

The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and correlates of illicit substance use among women with children living in the home. Thus, the dependent variable of interest was past year abuse or dependence of any illicit substance, including cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and hallucinogens, as well as non-medical abuse/dependence for prescription medications. Abuse and dependence were assessed in the NSDUH using criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version IV (DSM-IV) (22). This dichotomous variable was created from all substance use variables and categorized respondents with illicit substance abuse or dependence (1) or no illicit substance abuse or dependence (0).

Independent Variables

We measured 7 demographic variables, including: (a) age, defined by 4 categories (18–25, 26–34, 35–49, and 50 years or older), (b) race/ethnicity (White, African American, Hispanic and Other Race/Ethnicity), (c) education, defined by 3 categories (less than 12 years, 12 years, and more than 12 years); (d) marital status, defined by 4 categories (married, widowed, divorced, and never married); (e) income in 4 categories (<$20,000, $20-49,999, $50-74,999, and >$75,000), (f) employment status, defined by 4 categories (full-time, part-time, unemployed, and other), and (g) population density, in 3 categories (metropolitan statistical area [MSA] >1 million people, MSA < 1 million people, non-MSA).

In addition to demographic variables, we examined 6 possible covariates of maternal substance abuse or dependence based on previous literature. These include: maternal physical health status, maternal stress in the past year, serious mental illness (SMI), interpersonal violence, receipt of public/governmental benefits, and health insurance status.

In the NSDUH, self-rated health status was measured by a single question asking respondents to rate their current health from excellent (1) to poor (5). A single question of self-rated health status has been shown to be a reliable indicator of overall health status in numerous studies (2325). Maternal stress in the past year was measured by responses to questions asking participants whether they experienced reactions to any extremely stressful event, such as upsetting memories, emotional distance from others, difficulties sleeping or concentrating, and feeling jumpy or easily startled. The NSDUH measures SMI by a variable that summed the scores (0 = none of the time to 4 = all of the time) on responses to 6 variables measuring how frequently respondents experienced psychological distress during the one month in the last year when they felt their worst emotionally. Respondents were coded as having SMI (1) if they scored greater than 12 (20;21). IPV was measured according to responses on two variables: how many times the respondent reported hitting or threatening to hit her partner, and how many times the respondent reported that her partner hit or threatened to hit her. A response greater than 0 to either of these questions was coded as experiencing relationship violence (IPV = 1); a response of 0 was recorded as no relationship violence (IPV = 0). Receipt of public benefits was measured according to whether respondents received welfare/cash assistance, government-sponsored job placement services, and/or child care subsidies in the past year (1) or not (2). Finally, in the NSDUH, health insurance status was measured according to whether insurance was private (1) or not (2).

Statistical Analyses

STATA 9.0 (College Station, TX) was used to analyze these data. We computed all statistics using the svyset command, which accounts for the complex survey design and weighting using Taylor series linearization. First, we computed descriptive statistics for the entire sample (women with dependent children <18 years living with them). Second, we ran separate bivariate logistic regression models for each independent variable to assess the relationships between the individual predictors and illicit substance abuse/dependence. Finally, we ran a multivariate logistic regression (MLR) model to examine the correlates of illicit substance abuse/dependence among women with dependent children. Variables that demonstrated significant bivariate association (P ≤ 0.05 and the 95% confidence interval did not include 1) were added to the multivariate model one at a time until model parsimony was achieved. The final multivariate model served as the basis for interpretation.

Results

Descriptive Statistics

The prevalence of substance abuse or dependence in this nationally representative sample of women with dependent children was 1.9% (Table 1), while the overall prevalence among all women responding to the survey was 1.8% (p=0.42, results not shown). The most common drug for which the women met abuse or dependence criteria was marijuana, followed by prescription analgesics. The majority of the sample was between 26 and 49 years of age. Just over 61% of participants self-identified as White, while the remaining identified as either African American (15.1%), Hispanic (16.9%), or other race/ethnicity (6.3%). Less than one-half reported education beyond a high school degree, while 18.5% reported less than 12 years of education and 31.8% reported a high school degree or equivalent. The majority of subjects were married (61.9%), while 3.4% were widowed, 15.3% divorced, and 19.4% had never married. Nearly 20% of participants reported annual family incomes below $20,000. Another 36.9% reported family incomes between $20,000 and $49,999, while the remaining 43.5% reported incomes above $50,000. Almost 70% of participants reported working full- or part-time. Just over 3% were unemployed as defined by the Current Population Survey, meaning they were currently looking for work (13, 14). The remaining 27.5% were classified as other, which included students and those not in the labor force.

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics for the Study Sample (N=19,300)

Characteristic %
Any Illicit Substance Abuse/Dependence 1.9
Specific Drugs–Abuse/Dependence
 Marijuana 0.9
 Cocaine 0.4
 Heroin 0.1
 Hallucinogens 0.1
 Prescription Analgesics 0.6
 Prescription Sedatives 0.1
 Prescription Stimulants 0.2
 Prescription Tranquilizers 0.2
 Multiple Substances 0.2
Age
 18–25 years 15.9
 26–34 years 25.9
 35–49 years 46.7
 50 years or older 11.5
Race/Ethnicity
 White 61.6
 African American 15.1
 Hispanic 16.9
 Other Race/Ethnicity 6.3
Education
 < 12 years 18.5
 12 years 31.8
 > 12 years 50.0
Total Family Income
 < $20,000 19.6
 $20,000 36.9
 $50,000 19.1
 $75,000 24.4
Marital Status
 Married 61.9
 Widowed 3.4
 Divorced 15.3
 Never Been Married 19.4
Employment Status
 Full-time 49.5
 Part-time 19.5
 Unemployed* 3.5
 Other+ 27.5
*

Seeking employment, but jobless;

+

Includes being out of the labor force and students

Correlates of Substance Abuse/Dependence

Results from the bivariate models (Table 2) indicated five demographic variables were significantly associated with illicit substance abuse or dependence among women with dependent children: younger age, less education, lower income, being divorced or never married, and being unemployed. Additionally, private health insurance status, receipt of public family services, and maternal health status, past year stress, serious mental illness, and interpersonal violence were also found to be associated (p < 0.05) with illicit drug abuse and/or dependence among women with dependent children in the home.

Table 2.

Results of Bivariate Regression Models

Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P-value
Age
 18–25 years 13.7 4.0–47 <0.001
 26–34 years 5.5 1.6–19 0.008
 35–49 years 3.8 1.0–14 0.036
 ≥ 50 years 1.0
Race/Ethnicity
 White 1.0
 African American 1.3 0.9–1.8 0.120
 Hispanic 0.9 0.6–1.3 0.502
 Other Race/Ethnicity 0.9 0.5–1.8 0.918
Education
 < 12 years 1.0
 12 years 0.6 0.4–0.8 <0.001
 > 12 years 0.4 0.3–0.6 <0.001
Income
 < $20K 1.0
 $20-49,999K 0.6 0.5–0.8 0.002
 $50-74,999K 0.3 0.2–0.5 <0.001
 ≥ $75K 0.3 0.2–0.5 <0.001
Marital Status
 Married 1.0
 Widowed 0.5 0.2–1.7 0.293
 Divorced 2.8 1.8–4.2 <0.001
 Never married 5.4 3.9–7.4 <0.001
Employment Status
 Full-time 1.0
 Part-time 1.0 0.7–1.4 0.911
 Unemployed 3.9 2.4–6.2 <0.001
 Other 1.2 0.9–1.6 0.278
Population Density
 MSA > 1million 1.0
 MSA < 1million 1.3 0.9–1.7 0.100
 No MSA 1.1 0.8–1.6 0.402
Private Health Insurance
 Yes 1.0
 No 2.7 2.1–3.5 <0.001
Received Public Family Services
 Yes 1.0
 No 0.4 0.3–0.6 <0.001
Health Status
 Excellent 1.0
 Very Good 2.0 1.3–3.2 0.003
 Good 3.3 2.0–5.2 <0.001
 Fair 5.3 3.1–9.2 <0.001
 Poor 4.2 1.5–11.7 0.006
Stress Past Year
 Yes 1.0
 No 0.99 0.99–0.99 <0.001
Serious Mental Illness
 No 1.0
 Yes 6.4 4.9–8.4 <0.001
Interpersonal Violence
 No 1.0
 Yes 2.2 1.5–3.3 <0.001

Results from the MLR model (Table 3) revealed women who were older and had a high school degree or equivalent (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47–0.98) were less likely to be abusing or dependent on illicit drugs, controlling for income, employment status, and insurance status. Younger women were also significantly more likely to be abusing or dependent on illicit substances. Compared with women age 50 and older, women in the 18 to 25 category were 7.7 times more likely to meet the DSM-IV abuse or dependence criteria, adjusting for all other variables in the model. Women who had serious mental illness were 3.70 times (95% CI: 2.76–4.96) more likely to be abusing or depending on illicit drugs than women not meeting the criteria for SMI. Similarly, women who self-reported their health as only good or fair were respectively 2.13 (95% CI: 1.32, 3.44) and 3.07 (95% CI: 1.69, 5.56) times more likely to abuse or be dependent on illicit substances than those reporting excellent health. Finally, women without significant stress in the previous 12 months may be less likely to abuse or be dependent on illicit substances (AOR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98–0.99), although given the proximity of the point estimate to 1, there may be no differences in stress between users and non-users.

Table 3.

Multivariable Regression Model Examining Illicit Substance Abuse or Dependence among Women with Children

Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P-value
Age
 18–25 years 7.7 2.0–30.1 0.003
 26–34 years 5.0 1.2–20.0 0.024
 35–49 years 4.3 1.1–17.0 0.038
 ≥ 50 years 1.0
Education
 < 12 years 1.0
 12 years 0.7 0.5–0.9 0.040
 ≥ 12 years 0.7 0.5–1.1 0.124
Income
 < $20K 1.0
 $20-49,999K 1.0 0.8–1.4 0.791
 $50-74,999K 0.8 0.5–1.3 0.315
 > $75K 0.9 0.5–1.7 0.873
Private Insurance 1.3 0.9–1.9 0.178
Marital Status
 Married 1.0
 Widowed 1.0 0.2–3.9 0.953
 Divorced 1.7 1.1–2.7 0.015
 Never married 2.7 1.8–4.0 <0.001
Employment Status
 Full-time 1.0
 Part-time 0.9 0.6–1.3 0.724
 Unemployed 1.5 0.9–2.6 0.146
 Other 0.9 0.6–1.3 0.615
Serious Mental Illness 3.7 2.8–5.0 <0.001
Stress 0.9 0.9–0.99 <0.001
Health Status
 Excellent 1.0
 Very Good 1.6 1.0–2.5 0.057
 Good 2.1 1.3–3.4 0.002
 Fair 3.1 1.7–5.6 <0.001
 Poor 2.5 0.9–6.8 0.082

Discussion

Results from this study show that almost 2% of female caregivers with children under age 18 in the home use illicit substances. Several factors associated with substance abuse and dependence emerged from this study of women with dependent children. Women who were younger, divorced and never married had increased odds of abuse and dependence on illicit drugs after controlling for other demographic characteristics. These findings support other research that has shown older women are less likely to use illicit substances than younger women (26), and the social support of having a marital partner reduces the odds of using drugs and other substances as a coping strategy (27). Additionally, maternal stress, SMI, and poorer perceived health were significant correlates of illicit substance abuse and dependence. These findings corroborate other studies that have shown substance abuse disorders are comorbid with other mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and severe stress (28;29). They also support other research demonstrating drug use among healthy young adults is associated with decreased self-rated health over time (8).

This study supports others who argue for the importance of understanding the impact of parental substance use and dependence on children’s health. Substance abuse has been called the dominant characteristic of families involved in child abuse cases, and this should be explored when children present with indicators of neglect or abuse (4). Since substance abuse may be one way mothers cope with mental illness, lack of social support, or increased stress, it is advisable to ask what types of stressors exist in the home, and how they may be affecting the children (28;30).

Findings from this study suggest important psychosocial risk factors that may be identified in clinical settings and reduce the number of children living in high-risk households. There have been ongoing discussions in the literature of the unique role of pediatric clinicians in identifying maternal psychosocial problems through preventive screenings (31;32). Further, research specifically on maternal depression and stress suggests screening in pediatric practices can be helpful in identifying at-risk mothers and making appropriate referrals (33). However, Heneghan and colleagues (34) found mothers may be reluctant to discuss their emotional health and well-being with their children’s clinicians due to fears of judgment from the practitioner or referrals to child protective services. Consequently, future studies are needed to determine effective tools and methods to screen for risk factors associated with maternal drug use at well-child visits. Such screenings can serve not only to identify children living in households with current maternal drug use, but also as primary prevention to identify mothers at-risk for substance use and make appropriate referrals to counseling and social services before they develop abuse and/or dependence.

In addition to screening for risk factors of maternal substance abuse at well-child visits, screening for actual substance abuse is another important public health strategy in reducing the number of children exposed to maternal substance use in the home. Interestingly, few studies have been conducted on screening for parental substance abuse in a pediatric setting, and it is not standard practice in preventive care. However, evidence suggests this practice is feasible. In one study (35) investigators tested screening instruments for alcohol and substance use and found a 6-question screen had good sensitivity in identifying alcohol and drug abuse and was easily incorporated into practice. A study of maternal alcohol use in a pediatric emergency department demonstrated screening for abuse is feasible in this busy setting (36). These authors noted maternal substance use is associated with decreased use of preventive pediatric services and increased use of emergent pediatric services, and thus an emergency setting may be a more appropriate venue for screening maternal drug abuse.

Finally, primary care providers also may play a role in identifying women at risk for illicit substance abuse and dependence. Our findings suggest an initial screen can and should include identification of psychosocial risk factors, including young age, single marital status, high stress levels, mental illness, and general health status. Research has demonstrated the utility of a 3-question screen that is easily administered in the busy primary care practice (37). Once identified, clinical data show that substance abuse treatment can be effective in treating illicit substance abuse and dependence, especially when programs are gender-specific (38). However, it also appears that motivation for treatment among women with children is low, given the potential for custodial issues (39). The results from this study suggest that abuse/dependence on marijuana and prescription analgesics (opioids) are most prevalent among women with children in the home. Therefore, newer treatments, such as buprenorphine for opioid dependence, may be a more viable option for these women given it is not only effective, but can be prescribed by trained physicians in a primary care setting (40).

While these findings show prevalence rates and correlates between specific factors and maternal substance abuse and dependence, the direction of effect is unknown, and causal associations cannot be determined from cross-sectional data. Longitudinal studies are warranted. A second limitation is the difficulty of measuring substance abuse and dependence as a dichotomous variable, because there are a wide variety of substance disorders as measured in the DSM-IV (e.g., alcohol dependence and prescription drug abuse demonstrate different effects, and these will affect children differently). Third, the use of SMI may be an imprecise measure of psychiatric distress among these women. However, it is the only measure of mental illness in the dataset and is an important construct to consider when examining substance abuse and dependence. In addition, if the measure is indeed imprecise, this would indicate non-differential misclassification and would therefore bias the estimate towards the null. In turn, the strong association found between SMI and substance abuse/dependence among women with children would likely be an underestimation of the true odds. Finally, despite interviewer efforts, there always exists the likelihood for bias in reporting sensitive issues such as substance abuse (28).

Despite these limitations, our results suggest directions that could be pursued in developing best practices in substance abuse screening among women with children. Public health professionals and primary care practitioners can collaborate to determine appropriate brief screenings to assess maternal substance use among children exhibiting emotional or behavioral disturbances. Linking families to community resources including mental health services, alcohol and other drug treatment services, parenting training and other services may help mitigate effects of adverse environment in families affected by drug use. Longitudinal studies to investigate the complex constellation of influences on child well-being that are associated with drug abuse in the home, including demographic risk factors, parental mental health, substance use and abuse, and household violence, might provide better direction for the most effective points of intervention.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded in part by NIH/NIDA grant number 5 K12 DA014040-07 (LAS).

Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACASI

audio computer-assisted self-interviewing

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

CAPI

computer-assisted personal interviewing

DSM-IV

Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition

IPV

interpersonal violence

MLR

multiple logistic regression

MSA

metropolitan statistical area

NSDUH

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

SMI

serious mental illness

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Leigh Ann Simmons, Departments of Family Studies and Health Services Management, University of Kentucky.

Jennifer R. Havens, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky

Jason B. Whiting, College of Human Sciences, Texas Tech University

Jennifer L. Holz, Croney and Clark, Inc

Henrietta Bada, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky

Reference List

  • 1.Conners NA, Bradley RH, Mansell LW, et al. Children of mothers with serious substance abuse problems: an accumulation of risks. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004;30(1):85–100. doi: 10.1081/ada-120029867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clark DB, Cornelius J, Wood DS, Vanyukov M. Psychopathology risk transmission in children of parents with substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(4):685–691. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chatterji P, Markowitz S. The impact of maternal alcohol and illicit drug use on children’s behavior problems: evidence from the children of the national longitudinal survey of youth. J Health Econ. 2001;20(5):703–731. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00090-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clarke J, Stein MD, Sobota M, Marist M, Hanna L. Victims as victimizers: Physical aggression by persons with a history of childhood abuse. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1999;159:1920–1924. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.16.1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hanson RF, Self-Brown S, Fricker-Elhai A, Kilpatrick DG, Saunders BE, Resnick H. Relations among parental substance use, violence exposure and mental health: the national survey of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2006;31(11):1988–2001. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hayatbakhsh MR, Alati R, Hutchinson DM, et al. Association of maternal smoking and alcohol consumption with young adults’ cannabis use: a prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(5):592–598. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reinherz HZ, Giaconia RM, Hauf AM, Wasserman MS, Paradis AD. General and specific childhood risk factors for depression and drug disorders by early adulthood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39(2):223–231. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200002000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kertesz SG, Pletcher MJ, Safford M, et al. Illicit drug use in young adults and subsequent decline in general health: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young adults (CARDIA) Study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2007;88(2–3):224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O’Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Wenzel A. Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(11):1039–1045. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.11.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schluger J, Bart G, Green M, Ho A, Kreek M. Corticotropin-releasing factor testing reveals a dose-dependent difference in methadone maintained vs control subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:985–994. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O’Doherty F, Davies JB. Life events and addiction: a critical review. Br J Addict. 1987;82(2):127–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1987.tb01451.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang B, Dawson DA, Stinson FS, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of nonmedical prescription drug use and drug use disorders in the United States: Results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2006;67(7):1062–1073. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Comptom WM, Thomas YF, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2007;64(5):566–576. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bennett LW. Substance abuse and the domestic assault of women. Soc Work. 1995;40(6):760–771. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martin SL, Beaumont JL, Kupper LL. Substance use before and during pregnancy: Links to intimate partner violence. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29(3):599–617. doi: 10.1081/ada-120023461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pollack HA, Reuter P. Welfare receipt and substance-abuse treatment among low-income mothers: The impact of welfare reform. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(11):2024–2031. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Williams CT, Juon HS, Ensminger ME. Marijuana and cocaine use among female African-American welfare recipients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2004;75(2):185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McFarland BH, Lynch FL, Freeborn DK, et al. Substance abuse treatment duration for Medicaid versus commercial clients in a health maintenance organization. Medical Care. 2006;44(6):601–606. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215814.01127.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schmidt LA, Weisner CM. Private insurance and the utilization of chemical dependency treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA); Office of Applied Studies. National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002. Rockville, MD: 2002. Ref Type: Report. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA); Office of Applied Studies. National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2003. Rockville, MD: 2003. Ref Type: Report. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.DeSalvo K, Fran V, McDonell M, Fihn S. Predicting mortality and health care utilization with a single question. Health Services Research. 2005;40(4):1234–1246. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00404.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DeSalvo K, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Mutaner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question: A meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21(3):267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00291.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eriksson I, Unden A, Elofsson S. Self-rated health: Comparisons between three different measures: Results from a population study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2001;30(2):326–333. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.2.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yorkston E, Russell A, Turner C. Longitudinal predictors of changes to illicit drug use among young Australian women. Addiction. 2007;102(11):1798–1803. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duncan GJ, Wilkerson B, England P. Cleaning up their act: the effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography. 2006;43(4):691–710. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Briere J, Scott C. Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Simmons L, Havens J. Co-occurring substance and mental disorders among rural Americans: Results from the national comorbidity survey. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Corvo K, Carpenter EH. Effects of parental substance abuse on current levels of domestic violence: A possible elaboration of intergenerational transmission of processes. Journal of Family Violence. 2000;15(2):123–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zuckerman B, Parker S. Preventive pediatrics--new models of providing needed health services. Pediatrics. 1995;95(5):758–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schor EL. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics. 2003;111(6 Pt 2):1541–1571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Olson AL, Dietrich AJ, Prazar G, Hurley J. Brief maternal depression screening at well-child visits. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):207–216. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Heneghan AM, Mercer M, DeLeone NL. Will mothers discuss parenting stress and depressive symptoms with their child’s pediatrician? Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 1):460–467. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.3.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kemp VH, Hatmaker DD. Health practices and anxiety in low-income, high and low-risk pregnant women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1993;22(3):266–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1993.tb01808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Flynn HA, Cain SA, O’Mahen HA, Davis MM. Detection of maternal alcohol use problems in the pediatric emergency department. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(7):1160–1164. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chasnoff IJ, Neuman K, Thornton C, Callaghan MA. Screening for substance use in pregnancy: a practical approach for the primary care physician. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(4):752–758. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.109939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Niv N, Hser YI. Women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs: service needs, utilization and outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;87(2–3):194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wilke DJ, Kamata A, Cash SJ. Modeling treatment motivation in substance-abusing women with children. Child Abuse Negl. 2005;29(11):1313–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sullivan LE, Fiellin DA. Narrative review: buprenorphine for opioid-dependent patients in office practice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(9):662–670. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES