Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2009 Feb 23;53(5):2215–2217. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01100-08

Antibacterial Activity of Ultrashort Cationic Lipo-β-Peptides

Griselda N Serrano 1, George G Zhanel 2, Frank Schweizer 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC2681537  PMID: 19237652

Abstract

Previously reported d,l-lipo-α-peptides and their lipo-β-peptide counterparts (C16-KGGK, C16-KAAK, C16-KKKK, and C12-KLLK) were studied, and the lipo-β-peptides were found to retain antimicrobial activity. Likewise, no significant changes in antimicrobial activity were found upon activity comparisons with d,l-amino acid-based lipopeptides or any l-amino acid lipopeptides. As a defined amphipathic structure is unlikely to form with such short molecules and as similar activities were obtained from all lipopeptides, we suspect that the action of membrane permeation is retained.


The rise of antibiotic-resistant microbes has prompted interest in novel therapeutics with new modes of action, including antimicrobial lipopeptides. Naturally occurring lipopeptides produced by bacteria, yeasts, and fungi with largely antifungal activity exist, but some also show antibacterial activity (2, 5, 7). Native lipopeptides are cyclic and anionic and contain short peptide portions of six or seven d- and l-amino acids that are toxic to mammalian cells due to a lack of selectivity (3, 10). However, studies of synthetic lipopeptides formed from acylated antimicrobial peptides report a marked improvement in bioactivity against bacteria (1, 4, 6). Recently, a series of short lipopeptides were synthesized from biologically inactive d,l cationic tetrapeptides and found to possess cell-lysing activity against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, with both aliphatic chain length and peptide sequence determining cell type selectivity (7). This study aims to investigate the biological activity of short cationic lipo-β-peptides on the basis of previously reported lipo-α-peptides (7). As with incorporation of d-enantiomers, peptidomimetics incorporating β-amino acids offer the potential benefit of metabolic and enzymatic stability against proteases, one of the major drawbacks in peptide-based drug development (11).

American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains as well as clinical isolates from the Canadian Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) study were used, including Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33592, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) (cefazolin MIC, >32 μg/ml) CAN-ICU 61589, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Enterococcus faecium ATCC 27270, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli (gentamicin-resistant) CAN-ICU 61714, E. coli (amikacin MIC, 32 μg/ml) CAN-ICU 63074, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, P. aeruginosa (gentamicin-resistant) CAN-ICU 62308, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CAN-ICU 62584, Acinetobacter baumannii CAN-ICU 63169, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 (13).

Both the lipo-α-peptides and the lipo-β-peptides (Table 1) investigated in this study were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis using standard 9-fluorenylmethoxy carbonyl chemistry on Rink amide-4-methylbenzhydrylamine hydrochloride salt resin. Palmitic acid and lauric acid were conjugated to the tetrapeptides via modified solid-phase methods. TBTU [2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate] (3 eq), lipophilic acid (3 eq), and diisopropylethylamine (9 eq) reacted in a solution of 45% CH2Cl2 in dimethylformamide, and the process was repeated twice. Lipopeptide cleavage in 95% trifluoroacetic acid was achieved, followed by purification on reversed-phase C18 silica. The homogeneity and identity of the synthetic peptides were assessed by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance.

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial activities of ultrashort cationic lipopeptidesa

Control organism MIC (μg/ml)
Gentamicin αC16-KGGK αC16-KKKK αC16-KAAK αC12-KLLK αC16-KGGK αC16-KKKK αC16-KAAK αC12-KLLK βC16-KGGK βC16-KKKK βC16-KAAK βC12-KLLK
S. aureus ATCC 29213 1 8 32 16 16 16 16 8 16 16 16 64 32
MRSA ATCC 33592 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 32 16 32 16 32 32
S. epidermidis ATCC 14990 0.25 4 4 8 16 8 4 4 8 8 4 8 16
MRSE CAN-ICU 61589 32 8 8 8 16 8 8 8 16 16 4 16 32
E. faecalis ATCC 29212 ND 8 16 16 32 16 32 16 32 32 32 32 64
E. faecium ATCC 27270 ND 16 16 8 16 16 16 8 32 32 16 32 32
S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 4 128 >64 128 128 128 >32 128 64 128 128 >64 128
E. coli ATCC 25922 1 16 16 16 128 16 32 32 64 32 16 64 64
E. coli CAN-ICU 61714 128 16 16 16 128 64 32 32 64 32 32 64 64
E. coli CAN-ICU 63074 8 16 32 16 128 16 32 32 64 32 32 64 64
P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 8 64 64 32 128 64 32 64 128 64 64 256 128
P. aeruginosa CAN-ICU 62308 128 64 256 64 128 64 256 64 128 >64 128 128 128
S. maltophilia CAN-ICU 62584 >512 128 256 128 >256 64 256 128 >256 256 256 >128 256
A. baumannii CAN-ICU 63169 128 128 256 128 >64 64 256 128 >256 128 256 256 >128
K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 0.25 64 256 128 256 64 256 128 >64 128 128 >128 256
a

Underlined letters represent the positions of the d-enantiomers. MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; ND, not determined.

Antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms was investigated via broth macrodilution tests using CLSI methodology (13). Stock solutions of lipopeptide antibiotics in water were brought to a standard concentration of 512 μg/ml, with only βC12-KLLK and βC16-KAAK requiring a minute amount of dimethyl sulfoxide. Organisms were subcultured and isolated on blood agar, suspended in 3 ml of Mueller-Hinton broth at the turbidity of a 0.5 M McFarland standard, and diluted to approximately 105 CFU/ml before introduction into tubes containing serially diluted lipopeptide antibiotic in Mueller-Hinton broth. Testing of activity against S. pneumoniae used broth supplemented with laked horse blood to give 5% horse blood in experimental tubes. The turbidity resulting from the lipopeptide solution in broth required the creation of control tubes lacking microbes serving as turbidity controls. All tubes were incubated overnight for 16 to 20 h at 37°C. Colony counts for a diluted 105-CFU/ml solution of microorganisms confirmed the validity of the trial, with colony counts expected in the 105-CFU/ml range with incubation overnight in a CO2 incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2.

In this study, a total of 12 lipopeptides were synthesized with a tetrapeptide moiety containing (i) all l-amino acids, (ii) d,l-amino acids, and (iii) all β-amino acids, based on the following four sequences: C16-KGGK, C16-KAAK, C16-KKKK, and C12-KLLK. These sequences are based on a representative sample of the highly active N-terminal acylated lipopeptides reported by Makovitzki and coworkers (7), and as such, the d,l-amino acid-based lipopeptides serve as the control group. The sequences for the lipo-α-peptides and lipo-β-peptides are listed in Table 1, with the positions of the d-enantiomers shown.

As studies previously indicated, the lipopeptides containing only l-amino acids did not show significant differences in antimicrobial activity from peptides incorporating the d-enantiomer of an amino acid (8). Also, the activities of the lipo-β-peptides were comparable to those of their d,l-amino acid counterparts, with limited differences (almost all values within a twofold dilution) (Table 1). Gram-positive organisms proved generally more susceptible to these lipopeptide agents than did gram-negative bacteria. Among gram negatives, only E. coli strains proved somewhat susceptible to all sequences of lipopeptides, although the MICs were higher with the C12-KLLK series, in which MICs ranged between 64 and 128 μg/ml. Interestingly, among gram positives, only S. pneumoniae proved less susceptible to the lipopeptide antibiotics, with MICs largely greater than 64 μg/ml. However, it should be stated that the MICs for S. pneumoniae were reduced 8- to 32-fold for all lipopeptides when the MIC experiments were performed with Todd Hewitt instead of Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with laked horse blood. This suggests that lipopeptides are highly protein bound.

Among all species tested, S. epidermidis consistently showed the highest levels of susceptibility to all synthesized lipopeptides, followed closely by its antibiotic-resistant counterpart, MRSE. Likewise, all other organisms for which antibiotic-resistant strains were tested showed activities similar to those of their nonresistant counterparts. Organisms such as S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa had MICs that, for the most part, did not vary over more than a twofold dilution. The organisms S. maltophilia, A. baumannii, and K. pneumoniae proved least susceptible to all lipopeptides.

Since resistance to lipopeptides is a generally rare occurrence (12), and because of the advantages that β-amino acids provide (9, 11), lipo-β-peptides merit further work as potential novel therapeutics. Our results demonstrate that lipo-β-peptides display antimicrobial activities comparable to those of lipo-α-peptides. Previous studies have shown that the mode of action of ultrashort α-lipopeptides involves permeation and disintegration of membranes, similar to what was found for many long antimicrobial peptides (7). This mode of action makes it difficult for the microorganisms to develop resistance. It is unlikely that ultrashort α- and β-lipopeptides as used in this study will form a defined and stable amphipathic structure. This implies that ultrashort α- and β-lipopeptides will retain similar modes of antibacterial action.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for financial support.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 23 February 2009.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Andrä, J., K. Lohner, S. E. Blondelle, R. Jerala, I. Moriyon, M. H. J. Koch, P. Garidel, and K. Brandenburg. 2005. Enhancement of endotoxin neutralization by coupling of a C12-alkyl chain to a lactoferricin-derived peptide. Biochem. J. 385:135-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Avrahami, D., and Y. Shai. 2003. Bestowing antifungal and antibacterial activities by lipophilic acid conjugation to D,L-amino acid-containing antimicrobial peptides: a plausible mode of action. Biochemistry 42:14946-14956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Avrahami, D., and Y. Shai. 2004. A new group of antifungal and antibacterial lipopeptides derived from non-membrane active peptides conjugated to palmitic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 279:12277-12285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Japelj, B., M. Zorko, A. Majerle, P. Pristovšek, S. Sanchez-Gomez, G. Martinez de Tejada, I. Moriyon, S. E. Blondelle, K. Brandenburg, J. Andrä, K. Lohner, and R. Jerala. 2007. The acyl group as the central element of the structural organization of antimicrobial lipopeptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:1022-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jerala, R. 2007. Synthetic lipopeptides: a novel class of anti-infectives. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 16:1159-1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Majerle, A., J. Kidrič, and R. Jerala. 2003. Enhancement of antibacterial and lipopolysaccharide binding activities of a human lactoferrin peptide fragment by the addition of acyl chain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1159-1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Makovitzki, A., D. Avrahami, and Y. Shai. 2006. Ultrashort antibacterial and antifungal lipopeptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:15997-16002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Papo, N., and Y. Shai. 2004. Effect of drastic sequence alteration and D-amino acid incorporation on the membrane binding behavior of lytic peptides. Biochemistry 43:6393-6403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seebach, D., A. K. Beck, and D. J. Bierbaum. 2004. The world of β- and γ-peptides comprised of homologated proteinogenic amino acids and other components. Chem. Biodivers. 1:1111-1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shai, Y., A. Makovitzky, and D. Avrahami. 2006. Host defense peptides and lipopeptides: modes of action and potential candidates for the treatment of bacterial and fungal infections. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 7:479-486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steer, D. L., R. A. Lew, P. Perlmutter, A. I. Smith, and M.-I. Aguilar. 2002. β-Amino acids: versatile peptidomimetics. Curr. Med. Chem. 9:811-822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Straus, S. K., and R. E. W. Hancock. 2006. Mode of action of the new antibiotic for Gram-positive pathogens daptomycin: comparison with cationic antimicrobial peptides and lipopeptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758:1215-1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhanel, G. G., M. DeCorby, N. Laing, B. Weshnoweski, R. Vashisht, F. Tailor, K. Nichol, A. Wierzbowski, T. Baudry, J. A. Karlowsky, M. P. Lagace-Wiens, A. Walkty, M. McCracken, M. Mulvey, J. Johnson, The Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CARA), and D. J. Hoban. 2008. Antimicrobial resistant pathogens in intensive care units across Canada: results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) study, 2005/2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1430-1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES