Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1990 Oct;28(10):2234–2239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.10.2234-2239.1990

Efficacies of selected disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

M Best 1, S A Sattar 1, V S Springthorpe 1, M E Kennedy 1
PMCID: PMC268154  PMID: 2121783

Abstract

The activities of 10 formulations as mycobactericidal agents in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-contaminated suspensions (suspension test) and stainless steel surfaces (carrier test) were investigated with sputum as the organic load. The quaternary ammonium compound, chlorhexidine gluconate, and an iodophor were ineffective in all tests. Ethanol (70%) was effective against M. tuberculosis only in suspension in the absence of sputum. Povidone-iodine was not as efficacious when the test organism was dried on a surface as it was in suspension, and its activity was further reduced in the presence of sputum. Sodium hypochlorite required a higher concentration of available chlorine to achieve an effective level of disinfection than did sodium dichloroisocyanurate. Phenol (5%) was effective under all test conditions, producing at least a 4-log10 reduction in CFU. The undiluted glutaraldehyde-phenate solution was effective against M. tuberculosis and a second test organism, Mycobacterium smegmatis, even in the presence of dried sputum, whereas the diluted solution (1:16) was only effective against M. smegmatis in the suspension test. A solution of 2% glutaraldehyde was effective against M. tuberculosis. This investigation presents tuberculocidal efficacy data generated by methods simulating actual practices of routine disinfection.

Full text

PDF
2234

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome--recommendations of the working party. J Hosp Infect. 1986 May;7(3):295–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Best M., Sattar S. A., Springthorpe V. S., Kennedy M. E. Comparative mycobactericidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants in suspension and carrier tests. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov;54(11):2856–2858. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.11.2856-2858.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cole E. C., Rutala W. A., Nessen L., Wannamaker N. S., Weber D. J. Effect of methodology, dilution, and exposure time on the tuberculocidal activity of glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1813–1817. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1813-1817.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis D., Bonekat H. W., Andrews D., Shigeoka J. W. Disinfection of the flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M gordonae. Thorax. 1984 Oct;39(10):785–788. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.10.785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hegna I. K. An examination of the effect of three phenolic disinfectants on Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Appl Bacteriol. 1977 Oct;43(2):183–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Isenberg H. D., Giugliano E. R., France K., Alperstein P. Evaluation of three disinfectants after in-use stress. J Hosp Infect. 1988 Apr;11(3):278–285. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90106-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leers W. D. Disinfecting endoscopes: how not to transmit Mycobacterium tuberculosis by bronchoscopy. Can Med Assoc J. 1980 Aug 23;123(4):275-80, 283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lind A., Lundholm M., Pedersen G., Sundaeus V., Wåhlén P. A carrier method for the assessment of the effectiveness of disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Hosp Infect. 1986 Jan;7(1):60–67. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(86)90027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manowska W., Krzywicka H., Janowska J. Bakteriobójcze działanie środków odkazajacych na niektóre szczepy pratków gruźlicy. Przegl Epidemiol. 1979;33(2):293–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nelson K. E., Larson P. A., Schraufnagel D. E., Jackson J. Transmission of tuberculosis by flexible fiberbronchoscopes. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Jan;127(1):97–100. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Russell A. D., Hammond S. A., Morgan J. R. Bacterial resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants. J Hosp Infect. 1986 May;7(3):213–225. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(86)90071-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rutala W. A. Draft guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control. 1989 Feb;17(1):24A–38A. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(89)80005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van Klingeren B., Pullen W. Comparative testing of disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium terrae in a quantitative suspension test. J Hosp Infect. 1987 Nov;10(3):292–298. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES