Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1990 Nov;28(11):2511–2513. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2511-2513.1990

Comparative evaluation of two test methods (enzyme immunoassay and latex fixation) for the detection of heterophil antibodies in infectious mononucleosis.

M Kim 1, M Wadke 1
PMCID: PMC268216  PMID: 2174901

Abstract

The present study evaluated the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay (Ventrex Laboratories) and Monolatex (Wampole Laboratories) for detection of infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies by comparing test results on sera of 247 symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to compare not only the two different test systems but also the two different methods they represent for accuracy in detecting infectious mononucleosis-specific heterophil antibodies. Discrepancies in the test results of the two kits were arbitrated by determining the Epstein-Barr virus antibody profiles of the samples. The study showed that the Ventrescreen Mono enzyme immunoassay is as good as the Monolatex test for detecting heterophil antibodies. After discrepancies were resolved, the sensitivity and specificity of the Ventrescreen assay were 100 and 98%, respectively.

Full text

PDF
2511

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cook L., Midgett J., Willis D., Clinton B., Folds J. D. Evaluation of latex-based heterophile antibody assay for diagnosis of acute infectious mononucleosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2391–2394. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2391-2394.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans A. S., Niederman J. C. EBV-IgA and new heterophile antibody tests in diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 May;77(5):555–560. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/77.5.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans A. S. The history of infectious mononucleosis. Am J Med Sci. 1974 Mar;267(3):189–195. doi: 10.1097/00000441-197403000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Steeper T. A., Horwitz C. A., Henle W., Henle G. Selected aspects of acute and chronic infectious mononucleosis and mononucleosis-like illnesses for the practicing allergist. Ann Allergy. 1987 Oct;59(4):243–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sumaya C. V. Serological testing for Epstein-Barr virus--developments in interpretation. J Infect Dis. 1985 Jun;151(6):984–987. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.6.984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tilton R. C., Dias F., Ryan R. W. Comparative evaluation of three commercial tests for detection of heterophile antibody in patients with infectious mononucleosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Feb;26(2):275–278. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.275-278.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES