Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Jul;22(1):44–47. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.44-47.1985

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and complement fixation test for the detection of specific antibody in cattle vaccinated and challenged with Brucella abortus.

S S Sutherland
PMCID: PMC268318  PMID: 3926817

Abstract

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a complement fixation test (CFT) were applied to sera collected regularly from 60 cattle challenged with Brucella abortus strain 544. Of the 60 cattle, 48 were vaccinated with either B. abortus strain 19 or B. abortus strain 45/20 as calves or adults. The remaining 12 cattle were not vaccinated. Of the 27 sera from cattle found to be infected at slaughter, 9 showed aberrant reactions to the CFT in that a positive titer after challenge was delayed or transient. The performance of the ELISA in these nine cattle with aberrant reactions and the other cattle in the trial was as follows. After vaccination with strain 19 or strain 45/20, the number of weeks at which the ELISA was positive was significantly greater (P less than 0.001) than that for the CFT. The strain 19 vaccine also induced positive responses to the CFT and the ELISA for a significantly longer period (P less than 0.001) than did the strain 45/20 vaccine. For cattle with aberrant reactions, the number of weeks after challenge when the ELISA was positive was significantly greater (P less than 0.001) than that for the CFT. For noninfected cattle, the average number of weeks after challenge when the CFT was negative (35 of 40) was higher than that for the ELISA (18 of 40).

Full text

PDF
44

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alton G. G., Maw J., Rogerson B. A., McPherson G. G. The serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: an evaluation of the complement fixation, serum agglutination and rose bengal tests. Aust Vet J. 1975 Feb;51(2):57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1975.tb09404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BIBERSTEIN E. L., McGOWAN B., Jr, ROBINSON E. A., HARROLD D. R. Epididymitis in rams. Studies on immunity. Cornell Vet. 1962 Apr;52:214–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cochrane A. L., Holland W. W. Validation of screening procedures. Br Med Bull. 1971 Jan;27(1):3–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cordes D. O., Carter M. E. Persistence of Brucella abortus infection in six herds of cattle under brucellosis eradication. N Z Vet J. 1979 Dec;27(12):255–259. doi: 10.1080/00480169.1979.34666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engvall E., Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry. 1971 Sep;8(9):871–874. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(71)90454-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heck F. C., Deyoe B. L., Williams J. D. Antibodies to Brucella abortus in sera from Strain 19 vaccinated and non-vaccinated cows as determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and conventional serologic methods. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1982 Nov;3(6):629–634. doi: 10.1016/0165-2427(82)90045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McNaught D. J., Chappel R. J., Allan G. S., Bourke J. A., Rogerson B. A. The effects of IgG2 and of antigen concentration on prozoning in the complement fixation test for bovine brucellosis. Res Vet Sci. 1977 Mar;22(2):194–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meyer M. E. Use of automated complement fixation screening test for serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc. 1979;(83):81–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Plackett P., Cottew G. S., Best S. J. An indirect haemolysis test (IHLT) for bovine brucellosis. Aust Vet J. 1976 Mar;:136–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1976.tb05448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sutherland S. S., Le Cras D. V., Robertson A. G. A study of cattle infected with Brucella abortus and which showed aberrant serological reactions. Aust Vet J. 1982 Nov;59(5):132–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1982.tb02757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sutherland S. S., Le Cras D. V., Robertson A. G., Johnston J. M., Evans R. J. Serological response of cattle after vaccination and challenge with Brucella abortus. Vet Microbiol. 1982 May;7(2):165–175. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(82)90028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutherland S. S., Robertson A. G., Le Cras D. V., Robertson G. M., Johnston J. M., Evans R. J. The effect of challenge with virulent Brucella abortus on beef cattle vaccinated as calves or adults with either Brucella abortus strain 19 or 45/20. Aust Vet J. 1981 Oct;57(10):470–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1981.tb05769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES