Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Aug;22(2):176–181. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.176-181.1985

Comparison of the automicrobic system, acridine orange-stained smears, and gram-stained smears in detecting bacteriuria.

B A Lipsky, J J Plorde, F C Tenover, F P Brancato
PMCID: PMC268354  PMID: 2411757

Abstract

We compared the accuracy of the Gram-stained smear, the acridine orange-stained smear, and the AutoMicrobic system (AMS; Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) in screening for bacteriuria, as detected by conventional cultures. For 1,024 clinical specimens, results with the acridine orange-stained smear and the Gram-stained smear were very similar. When read for the presence of one or more microorganisms or leukocytes per 20 oil immersion fields, both smears were highly sensitive (92.1 and 93.3%, respectively) and moderately specific (70.0 and 61.7%, respectively). Sensitivity was greater for specimens yielding greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml (96.1 and 98.9%, respectively) than for those with 10(3) to 10(4) CFU/ml (81.4 and 78.0%, respectively). Preliminary classification based upon the tinctorial and morphological characteristics of the Gram-stained smear was compatible with culture results in nearly all cases. The accuracy of the Gram-stained smears was not influenced by special cleaning of the microscopic slides, or the level of expertise of the microscopist. For 715 specimens, the sensitivity of the AMS in detecting bacteriuria (91.5%) was very similar to that of the stained smears (92.1 and 95.7%, respectively), but the specificity was significantly higher (83.2% versus 42.6 and 70.0%). Detection of microorganisms by the AMS took an average of 6.3 +/- 3.0 h. These data suggest that the Gram-stained smear is easily interpreted, very sensitive, acceptably specific, and still the optimal rapid method for screening for bacteriuria in most clinical microbiology laboratories.

Full text

PDF
176

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge C., Jones P. W., Gibson S., Lanham J., Meyer M., Vannest R., Charles R. Automated microbiological detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):406–413. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.406-413.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appelbaum P. C., Olmstead C. C. Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1982;170(3):173–184. doi: 10.1007/BF02298197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry A. L., Badal R. E. Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):257–265. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.257-265.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry A. L., Gavan T. L., Badal R. E., Telenson M. J. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):582–588. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.582-588.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brancato F. P., Parker M. J. The stained direct smear of clinical material. Health Lab Sci. 1966 Apr;3(2):69–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crout F. V., Tilton R. C. Rapid screening of urine for significant bacteriuria by Gram stain, acridine orange stain, and the Autobac MTS system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Jun;2(3):179–186. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cruickshank J. G., Gawler A. H., Hart R. J. Costs of unnecessary tests: nonsense urines. Br Med J. 1980 Jun 7;280(6228):1355–1356. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6228.1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis J. R., Stager C. E., Araj G. F. Clinical laboratory evaluation of a bacteriuria detection device for urine screening. Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jan;81(1):48–53. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duerden B. I., Moyes A. Comparison of laboratory methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J Clin Pathol. 1976 Apr;29(4):286–291. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.4.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freeman R. B., Bromer L., Brancato F., Cohen S. I., Garfield C. F., Griep R. J., Hinman E. J., Richardson J. A., Thurm R. H., Urner C. Prevention of recurrent bacteriuria with continuous chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med. 1968 Oct;69(4):655–672. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-69-4-655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gohain N. N., Bhujwala R. A., Prakash O. Bacteriology of urinary tract infections. II. A comparative study employing direct smear, pus cell count, catalase and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride reduction tests with bacterial counts. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol. 1969 Jan;12(1):20–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamoudi A. C., Lin S. Cost analysis of the Auto Microbic system urine identification card. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):411–414. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.411-414.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hashimoto F., Reed W., Chongsiriwatana K., Skipper B. Use of a semiquantitative microscopic method for detecting bacteriuria. Arch Intern Med. 1980 Dec;140(12):1625–1627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoff R. G., Newman D. E., Staneck J. L. Bacteriuria screening by use of acridine orange-stained smears. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):513–516. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.513-516.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holm S., Wahlin A., Wahlqvist L., Wedrén H., Lundgren B. Urine microscopy as screening method for bacteriuria. Acta Med Scand. 1982 May;211(3):209–212. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1982.tb01928.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Isenberg H. D., Gavan T. L., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W. I., Washington J. A., 2nd Clinical laboratory evaluation of automated microbial detection/identification system in analysis of clinical urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):226–230. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.226-230.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jorgensen J. H., Jones P. M. Comparative evaluation of the Limulus assay and the direct Gram stain for detection of significant bacteriuria. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Jan;63(1):142–148. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/63.3.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KASS E. H. Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1956;69:56–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KUNIN C. M. The quantitative significance of bacteria visualized in the unstained urinary sediment. N Engl J Med. 1961 Sep 21;265:589–590. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196109212651207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khan M. Q., Tandon P. L. Bacteriological study of urinary tract infection. J Indian Med Assoc. 1978 Aug 16;71(4):93–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kronvall G., Myhre E. Differential staining of bacteria in clinical specimens using acridine orange buffered at low pH. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1977 Aug;85(4):249–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1977.tb01970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewis J. F., Alexander J. Microscopy of stained urine smears to determine the need for quantitative culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Oct;4(4):372–374. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.4.372-374.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Morton R. E., Lawande R. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection: comparison of urine culture from suprapubic aspiration and midstream collection in a children's out-patient department in Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1982 Sep;2(3):109–112. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1982.11748240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murray P. R., Niles A. C. Detection of bacteriuria: manual screening test and early examination of agar plates. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):85–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.85-88.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicholson D. P., Koepke J. A. The Automicrobic System for urines. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Dec;10(6):823–833. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.823-833.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Perry J. L., Matthews J. S., Weesner D. E. Evaluation of leukocyte esterase activity as a rapid screening technique for bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):852–854. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.852-854.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pezzlo M. T. Automated methods for detection of bacteriuria. Am J Med. 1983 Jul 28;75(1B):71–78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90075-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pezzlo M. T., Tan G. L., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):468–474. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.468-474.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pfaller M. A., Baum C. A., Niles A. C., Murray P. R. Clinical laboratory evaluation of a urine screening device. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):674–679. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.674-679.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pollock H. M. Laboratory techniques for detection of urinary tract infection and assessment of value. Am J Med. 1983 Jul 28;75(1B):79–84. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90076-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Robins D. G., Rogers K. B., White R. H., Osman M. S. Urine microscopy as an aid to detection of bacteriuria. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):476–478. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92828-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenthal S. Microscopic screening for bacteriuria. N Y State J Med. 1976 Feb;76(2):209–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smalley D. L., Dittmann A. N. Use of leukocyte esterase-nitrate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1256–1257. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1256-1257.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith P. B., Gavan T. L., Isenberg H. D., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W. I., Washington J. A., 2nd, Balows A. Multi-laboratory evaluation of an automated microbial detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):657–666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.657-666.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sonnenwirth A. C. Preprototype of an automated microbial detection and identification system: a developmental investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):400–405. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.400-405.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tilton R. E., Tilton R. C. Automated direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microscopically screened urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Feb;11(2):157–161. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.2.157-161.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wadke M., McDonnell C., Ashton J. K. Rapid processing of urine specimens by urine screening and the AutoMicrobic system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Oct;16(4):668–672. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.4.668-672.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES