Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Sep;22(3):355–360. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.355-360.1985

Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.

H L Nadler, C Dolan, L Mele, S R Kurtz
PMCID: PMC268409  PMID: 3930559

Abstract

A total of 180 selected strains of gram-negative bacilli were tested for susceptibility to nine antibiotics by the prototype General Susceptibility Card and reference broth microdilution MIC method, and 112 of 180 were tested by the modified Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.). When category calls--susceptible, intermediate, and resistant for the prototype card and very susceptible, moderately susceptible, and resistant for the modified card--were identical or compatible (very susceptible by one method and moderately susceptible by the other), the methods were considered in qualitative or categorical agreement. The overall categorical agreement improved from 83% for the prototype card to 91.5% for the modified card, and the frequency of major and very major disagreements was reduced from 7.5 to 1%, respectively. Overall agreement between the modified card and reference method for both category calls and MICs (+/- 2 dilutions) was 90%. Of the results, 67% were identical, 22% were more susceptible with the modified card, and 11% were more resistant. Reproducibility of identical or compatible category calls and MICs obtained from three trials was 94.5%. The poorest accuracy and reproducibility were observed when testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study suggests that the modified card can rapidly and efficiently perform susceptibility tests with an acceptable level of accuracy and reproducibility provided that the system is appropriately used for testing strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae with preset criteria for excluding organism-antibiotic combinations. The evaluation also indicates dramatic improvement in the technical performance of the modified card compared with its earlier prototype.

Full text

PDF
355

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Backes B. A., Cavalieri S. J., Rudrik J. T., Britt E. M. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):744–747. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.744-747.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dudley M., Nauschuetz W. F., Juchau S. V. Clinical evaluation of new AMS GSC plus card. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):139–143. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hansen S. L., Freedy P. K. Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):878–886. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.878-886.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson J. E., Jorgensen J. H., Crawford S. A., Redding J. S., Pruneda R. C. Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;18(6):1301–1309. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1301-1309.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones R. N. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST): a review of changing trends, quality control guidelines, test accuracy, and recommendation for the testing of beta-lactam drugs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Mar;1(1):1–24. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90028-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M., Balfour L. C. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):902–905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.902-905.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lindsey N. J., Barnes W. G. Examination of major disagreements in susceptibility test results by Autobac-1 and MS-2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jul;20(1):115–119. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.1.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ngel J. G., Kunz L. J. Simplified storage and retrieval of stock cultures. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Apr;23(4):837–838. doi: 10.1128/am.23.4.837-838.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Horn K. G., Vandernoot A. M., Burke E. W., McKitrick J. C. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):630–635. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.630-635.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES