Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2009 Feb 10;453(1):9–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.009

Phactr2 and Parkinson's disease

Christian Wider 1, Sarah J Lincoln 1, Michael G Heckman 1, Nancy N Diehl 1, Jeremy T Stone 1, Kristoffer Haugarvoll 1,2, Jan O Aasly 2, J Mark Gibson 3, Timothy Lynch 4, Alex Rajput 5,6, Michele L Rajput 6, Ryan J Uitti 7, Zbigniew K Wszolek 7, Matthew J Farrer 1, Owen A Ross 1,*
PMCID: PMC2684848  NIHMSID: NIHMS102955  PMID: 19429005

Abstract

Attempts at replicating the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) have not successfully identified genetic risk factors. The present study reevaluates data from the GWAS and focuses on the SNP (rs11155313, located in the Phactr2 gene) with the lowest P-value in the Tier 2 patient-control series of the first PD GWAS. We employed four case-control series to examine the nominated SNP rs11155313 and identified association in US (OR: 1.39, P=0.032), Canadian (OR: 1.41, P=0.014) and Irish (OR: 1.44, P=0.034) patient-control series, but not in the Norwegian series (OR: 1.15, P=0.27). When combining all four series the observed trend was statistically significant (OR: 1.30, P<0.001). This study shows reappraisal of publicly available results of GWAS may help nominate new risk factors for PD.

Keywords: Genome-wide association, Parkinson's disease, Phactr2

Introduction

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) may hold the most promise in the mapping of causative/modifying genetic loci in complex disorders. The first GWAS in Parkinson's disease (PD) was reported using a two-tiered approach with an initial screen of ∼200,000 SNPs in a cohort of 443 discordant sib-pairs (Tier 1) [14]. A matched unrelated patient-control series (n=664) was then used in the replication study (Tier 2) to assess the influence of SNPs identified in Tier 1 (P<0.01). Maraganore and colleagues reported the eleven most significant SNPs that generated the lowest overall P-values from the combined analysis of the two tiers. Independent studies by our group and others have not been able to replicate the association of the nominated SNPs [3, 5, 6, 12, 13, 15], therefore reanalysis of the recently released raw data may be warranted.

Notably neither SNP with the most significant P-values in either Tier 1 or 2 were among those nominated. The SNP with the lowest P-value in Tier 1 (rs3746736; P=1.3×10-5) is located in the Type II Cystatin gene cluster containing the Cystatin C gene (aka Cystatin 3). Cystatin C is located on Chromosome 20 (23.56-23.57Mb) and contains 3 exons (mRNA 775bp; 146 amino acids). Mutation of the Cystatin C gene is a known cause of amyloidopathy and a linkage peak of late-onset Alzheimer's disease is also located over this gene cluster [10, 11]. Common variation has been associated with Alzheimer's disease and it is a top hit of meta-analysis on ALZforum (http://www.alzforum.org/res/com/gen/alzgene/default.asp)[2]. However SNP rs3746736 was also examined in the second GWAS in PD patients by Fung and colleagues [8] and showed no association with disease. The SNP with the lowest P-value in the study of Fung et al. (rs10501570; Chr11q14; P= 4.9×10-4) was also examined in Tier 1 of the Maraganore et al. study and demonstrated no significant association with PD (P=0.53).

The most significant SNP in Tier 2 of Maraganore et al., a matched patient-control series, is located in a gene Phactr2 (KIAA0680; Chr6q24.2), encoding protein phosphatase 1 and actin regulator 2 (rs11155313; P=1.5×10-5). This SNP was not included in the GWAS of Fung et al. and has never been replicated in a population-based patient-control series. The reason this SNP was not nominated in the original study is because it did not replicate in the combined analysis of both tiers. Herein we investigate the association of rs11155313 with PD in four Caucasian patient-control series from the US, Canada, Norway, and Ireland.

Subjects and Materials

The US series included 251 patients (51% male) with a mean age of 71 ± 10 years (range 36-87 years; age-at-onset 62 ± 12 years; range 23-85), the Norwegian series included 312 patients (59% male) with a mean age of 73 ± 11 years (range 47-99; age-at-onset 58 ± 11 years; range 25-88), and the Irish series included 186 patients (39% male) with a mean age of 61 ± 12 years (range 33-90; age-at-onset 50 ± 11 years; range 18-77). In the US, Norwegian and Irish series each patient was individually matched based on age (+/- 4 years), gender, and ethnicity to an unrelated control without evidence of neurological disease. The Canadian series (61% male) included 461 patients with a mean age of 73 ± 10 years (range 43-94; age-at-onset 62 ± 11 years; range 28-88) and 247 controls subjects (30% male) with a mean age of 67 ± 13 years (range 20-94). All patients were examined and observed longitudinally by a movement disorders neurologist and diagnosed with PD according to published criteria [9]. The ethical review board at each institution involved approved the study and all participants provided informed consent.

SNP genotyping was performed using TaqMan chemistry on an ABI7900 and analyzed with SDS 2.2.2 software. In the US, Norwegian and Irish series (individually matched for age and gender) where genotype data was only available for one sample of a matched pair, the other subject was retained in the analysis; however, this occurred in less than 5% of matched pairs. For the controls in each population, χ2 tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were examined. For the Irish, US, and Norwegian matched series, association between PD and rs11155313 was measured by odds ratios (OR's) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI's) obtained from single variable conditional logistic regression under an additive model. For the Canadian and combined series, association between PD and rs11155313 was measured by OR's and 95% CI's obtained from logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, and series under an additive model (combined series only).

Results and Discussion

Our analysis demonstrated an association between SNP rs11155313 and susceptibility to PD within the US (OR: 1.39, P=0.032), Canadian (OR: 1.41, P=0.014) and Irish (OR: 1.39, P=0.034) patient-control series (Table). However, this result was not replicated in the Norwegian patient-control series, although a trend in the same direction was observed (OR: 1.15, P=0.27). A combined analysis of the four series showed a significant association between rs11155313 and susceptibility to PD (OR: 1.30, P<0.001).

Table. Genotype and allele frequencies for rs11155313.

In the original GWAS rs11155313 minor allele frequency was increased in patients in Tier 1 (0.32 versus 0.27; OR 1.67; P-value 2.17 × 10-3) and decreased in patients in Tier 2 (0.27 versus 0.37; OR 0.58; P-value 1.54 × 10-5). Odds ratios in the present study correspond to an increase in one copy of the minor allele (G). Allele and genotype frequencies have been adjusted to account for individuals missing genotype data. For the matched US, Irish, and Norwegian series, estimated odds ratios and P-values result from single variable conditional logistic regression models. For the Canadian series, the estimated odds ratio and P-value results from a logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender.

Series/rs11155313 AA AG GG G (%) OR (95% CI) P
US
Controls 118 103 17 137 (29) 1.39 (1.03 – 1.88) 0.032
Patients 103 111 28 167 (35)
Canada
Controls 122 95 14 123 (27) 1.41 (1.07-1.85) 0.014
Patients 201 193 50 293 (33)
Norway
Controls 136 125 27 179 (31) 1.15 (0.89 – 1.49) 0.270
Patients 125 131 35 201 (35)
Ireland
Controls 92 73 12 97 (27) 1.44 (1.03 – 2.02) 0.034
Patients 80 74 26 126 (35)
Combined
Controls 468 396 70 536 (27) 1.30 (1.13-1.48) <0.001
Patients 509 509 139 787 (33)

The original study of Maraganore et al. observed an increase in the minor allele frequency of rs11155313 in Tier 1 examining 443 discordant sib-pairs (32% in affected siblings versus 27% in unaffected subjects; OR 1.67; P=2.17 × 10-3). However, a highly significant decrease in the minor allele frequency of SNP rs11155313 was observed in Tier 2 in their sporadic PD patients (27% versus 37% in controls; OR 0.58; P=1.54 × 10-5). It was this opposite direction of effect that was the reason it was not nominated in the original study. These findings would suggest the positive association observed with SNP rs11155313 in Tier 1 and the present study should be treated with caution. In addition, the study by Fung et al. did not find an association between Phactr2 genetic variability and risk of PD. However, they did not include rs11155313, nor any of the four other Phactr2 SNPs in strong LD (r2≥ 0.8) with rs11155313.

The phactr family of proteins contains four members (phactr 1-4) which are abundantly expressed in the nervous system [1]. There is very little known about the function of these proteins but they are suggested to regulate protein phosphatase 1 and bind to cytoplasmic actin. The phactr1 member has also been shown to be expressed at high levels in the cortex, hippocampus and striatum, with an increased presence at the synapse [1]. The role of kinase genes in PD is established (PINK1 and LRRK2), but the dysregulation of phosphatase activity may have a similar effect.

Recent results in LRRK2-associated parkinsonism have identified common variants in PD. In the ethnic Chinese population of Taiwan, the risk factors Lrrk2 G2385R and R1628P have been observed at 3-5% in the healthy control population while increasing to 6-10% of sporadic patients [4, 7, 16]. It is also worth noting that these functional variants on the whole appear absent in other populations, both Lrrk2 G2385R and R1628P have not been observed in Caucasian populations.

Given the identification of genetic risk variants in PD, our study supports a reappraisal of publicly available GWAS' results in PD which may lead to a better understanding of genes implicated in PD risk. If this association is confirmed, further studies are needed to better characterize the role of Phactr2 in PD.

Acknowledgments

Mayo Clinic Jacksonville is a Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence (NINDS P50 #NS40256) and a Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation (PARF) grant C06-01 (RJU, ZKW & MJF). CW is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PASMP3-123268/1).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Allen PB, Greenfield AT, Svenningsson P, Haspeslagh DC, Greengard P. Phactrs 1-4: A family of protein phosphatase 1 and actin regulatory proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:7187–7192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401673101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bertram L, McQueen MB, Mullin K, Blacker D, Tanzi RE. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat Genet. 2007;39:17–23. doi: 10.1038/ng1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clarimon J, Scholz S, Fung HC, Hardy J, Eerola J, Hellstrom O, Chen CM, Wu YR, Tienari PJ, Singleton A. Conflicting results regarding the semaphorin gene (SEMA5A) and the risk for Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:1082–1084. doi: 10.1086/504727. author reply 1092-1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Di Fonzo A, Wu-Chou YH, Lu CS, van Doeselaar M, Simons EJ, Rohe CF, Chang HC, Chen RS, Weng YH, Vanacore N, Breedveld GJ, Oostra BA, Bonifati V. A common missense variant in the LRRK2 gene, Gly2385Arg, associated with Parkinson's disease risk in Taiwan. Neurogenetics. 2006;7:133–138. doi: 10.1007/s10048-006-0041-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Elbaz A, Nelson LM, Payami H, Ioannidis JP, Fiske BK, Annesi G, Carmine Belin A, Factor SA, Ferrarese C, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Higgins DS, Kawakami H, Kruger R, Marder KS, Mayeux RP, Mellick GD, Nutt JG, Ritz B, Samii A, Tanner CM, Van Broeckhoven C, Van Den Eeden SK, Wirdefeldt K, Zabetian CP, Dehem M, Montimurro JS, Southwick A, Myers RM, Trikalinos TA. Lack of replication of thirteen single-nucleotide polymorphisms implicated in Parkinson's disease: a large-scale international study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:917–923. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70579-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farrer MJ, Haugarvoll K, Ross OA, Stone JT, Milkovic NM, Cobb SA, Whittle AJ, Lincoln SJ, Hulihan MM, Heckman MG, White LR, Aasly JO, Gibson JM, Gosal D, Lynch T, Wszolek ZK, Uitti RJ, Toft M. Genomewide association, Parkinson disease, and PARK10. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:1084–1088. doi: 10.1086/504728. author reply 1092-1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Farrer MJ, Stone JT, Lin CH, Dachsel JC, Hulihan MM, Haugarvoll K, Ross OA, Wu RM. Lrrk2 G2385R is an ancestral risk factor for Parkinson's disease in Asia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fung HC, Scholz S, Matarin M, Simon-Sanchez J, Hernandez D, Britton A, Gibbs JR, Langefeld C, Stiegert ML, Schymick J, Okun MS, Mandel RJ, Fernandez HH, Foote KD, Rodriguez RL, Peckham E, De Vrieze FW, Gwinn-Hardy K, Hardy JA, Singleton A. Genome-wide genotyping in Parkinson's disease and neurologically normal controls: first stage analysis and public release of data. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:911–916. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70578-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S. Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:33–39. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ghiso J, Jensson O, Frangione B. Amyloid fibrils in hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis of Icelandic type is a variant of gamma-trace basic protein (cystatin C) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:2974–2978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goddard KA, Olson JM, Payami H, van der Voet M, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G. Evidence of linkage and association on chromosome 20 for late-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurogenetics. 2004;5:121–128. doi: 10.1007/s10048-004-0174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goris A, Williams-Gray CH, Foltynie T, Compston DA, Barker RA, Sawcer SJ. No evidence for association with Parkinson disease for 13 single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified by whole-genome association screening. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:1088–1090. doi: 10.1086/504726. author reply 1092-1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Y, Rowland C, Schrodi S, Laird W, Tacey K, Ross D, Leong D, Catanese J, Sninsky J, Grupe A. A case-control association study of the 12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms implicated in Parkinson disease by a recent genome scan. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:1090–1092. doi: 10.1086/504725. author reply 1092-1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maraganore DM, de Andrade M, Lesnick TG, Strain KJ, Farrer MJ, Rocca WA, Pant PV, Frazer KA, Cox DR, Ballinger DG. High-resolution whole-genome association study of Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:685–693. doi: 10.1086/496902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Myers DR. Considerations for genomewide association studies in Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:1081–1082. doi: 10.1086/504730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ross OA, Wu YR, Lee MC, Funayama M, Chen ML, Soto AI, Mata IF, Lee-Chen GJ, Chen CM, Tang M, Zhao Y, Hattori N, Farrer MJ, Tan EK, Wu RM. Analysis of Lrrk2 R1628P as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:88–92. doi: 10.1002/ana.21405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES