Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Nov;22(5):757–760. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.757-760.1985

Rapid viral diagnosis of acute respiratory infections: comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the immunofluorescence technique for detection of viral antigens in nasopharyngeal secretions.

M Grandien, C A Pettersson, P S Gardner, A Linde, A Stanton
PMCID: PMC268521  PMID: 2997270

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal secretions from adults and children were obtained in Stockholm, Sweden, for routine diagnosis of influenza A virus, influenza B virus, respiratory syncytial (RS) virus, parainfluenza type 3 virus, and adenovirus infections by demonstration of viral antigens directly in the specimens. The cells in nasopharyngeal secretions were pelleted by centrifugation for preparation of cell deposits for diagnosis by the immunofluorescence technique (IF) in London, England, and in Stockholm, whereas the supernatants were used to diagnose infection by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in Stockholm. Titrations of the various purified viruses showed that ELISA could detect viral antigens in amounts corresponding to 1 to 10 ng of virus protein per test well. In a series of 73 specimens tested for influenza A, RS, and parainfluenza type 3 viruses by IF in London and by ELISA in Stockholm, 15 of 18 RS, 14 of 15 influenza A, and 2 of 2 parainfluenza type 3 viral infections were diagnosed by ELISA as compared with IF, giving sensitivities for RS and influenza A viral diagnosis of 83 and 93%, respectively, and a specificity of 100%. In another series of specimens from 35 patients tested for influenza B virus and adenovirus, five influenza B virus and four adenovirus infections were diagnosed by both methods; one additional influenza B infection was detected only by IF and another only by ELISA. Comparisons of diagnostic results between the two methods performed in Stockholm gave nonagreement of results for 37 of 1,593 tests (2.5%) for the five viruses. The conclusion reached was that the described ELISA, although a satisfactory test, had somewhat less sensitivity than did IF for the detection of respiratory viral infections. This could possibly be explained by unnecessary dilutions of specimens at the time of collection; transportation, processing, and storage of specimens were less complicated than for IF.

Full text

PDF
757

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chao R. K., Fishaut M., Schwartzman J. D., McIntosh K. Detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasal secretions from infants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Infect Dis. 1979 Apr;139(4):483–486. doi: 10.1093/infdis/139.4.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gardner P. S., Grandien M., McQuillin J. Comparison of immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase methods for viral diagnosis at a distance: a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ. 1978;56(1):105–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall C. B., McBride J. T., Walsh E. E., Bell D. M., Gala C. L., Hildreth S., Ten Eyck L. G., Hall W. J. Aerosolized ribavirin treatment of infants with respiratory syncytial viral infection. A randomized double-blind study. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jun 16;308(24):1443–1447. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198306163082403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hornsleth A., Friis B., Andersen P., Brenøe E. Detection of respiratory syncytial virus in nasopharyngeal secretions by ELISA: comparison with fluorescent antibody technique. J Med Virol. 1982;10(4):273–281. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890100407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McIntosh K., Hendry R. M., Fahnestock M. L., Pierik L. T. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus infection: application to clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):329–333. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.329-333.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meurman O., Ruuskanen O., Sarkkinen H. Immunoassay diagnosis of adenovirus infections in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1190–1195. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1190-1195.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Orstavik I., Grandien M., Halonen P., Arstila P., Mordhorst C. H., Hornsleth A., Popow-Kraupp T., McQuillin J., Gardner P. S., Almeida J. Viral diagnoses using the rapid immunofluorescence technique and epidemiological implications of acute respiratory infections among children in different European countries. Bull World Health Organ. 1984;62(2):307–313. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sarkkinen H. K., Halonen P. E., Arstila P. P., Salmi A. A. Detection of respiratory syncytial, parainfluenza type 2, and adenovirus antigens by radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay on nasopharyngeal specimens from children with acute respiratory disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Feb;13(2):258–265. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.2.258-265.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarkkinen H. K., Halonen P. E., Salmi A. A. Detection of influenza A virus by radioimmunoassay and enzyme-immunoassay from nasopharyngeal specimens. J Med Virol. 1981;7(3):213–220. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890070305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES